1
|
Pruszynski JA, Zylberberg J. The language of the brain: real-world neural population codes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019; 58:30-36. [PMID: 31326721 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Andrew Pruszynski
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Joel Zylberberg
- Center for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Madar AD, Ewell LA, Jones MV. Temporal pattern separation in hippocampal neurons through multiplexed neural codes. PLoS Comput Biol 2019; 15:e1006932. [PMID: 31009459 PMCID: PMC6476466 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Pattern separation is a central concept in current theories of episodic memory: this computation is thought to support our ability to avoid confusion between similar memories by transforming similar cortical input patterns of neural activity into dissimilar output patterns before their long-term storage in the hippocampus. Because there are many ways one can define patterns of neuronal activity and the similarity between them, pattern separation could in theory be achieved through multiple coding strategies. Using our recently developed assay that evaluates pattern separation in isolated tissue by controlling and recording the input and output spike trains of single hippocampal neurons, we explored neural codes through which pattern separation is performed by systematic testing of different similarity metrics and various time resolutions. We discovered that granule cells, the projection neurons of the dentate gyrus, can exhibit both pattern separation and its opposite computation, pattern convergence, depending on the neural code considered and the statistical structure of the input patterns. Pattern separation is favored when inputs are highly similar, and is achieved through spike time reorganization at short time scales (< 100 ms) as well as through variations in firing rate and burstiness at longer time scales. These multiplexed forms of pattern separation are network phenomena, notably controlled by GABAergic inhibition, that involve many celltypes with input-output transformations that participate in pattern separation to different extents and with complementary neural codes: a rate code for dentate fast-spiking interneurons, a burstiness code for hilar mossy cells and a synchrony code at long time scales for CA3 pyramidal cells. Therefore, the isolated hippocampal circuit itself is capable of performing temporal pattern separation using multiplexed coding strategies that might be essential to optimally disambiguate multimodal mnemonic representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine D. Madar
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, United States of America
- Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, United States of America
- Department of Neurobiology, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Laura A. Ewell
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, United States of America
- Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn–Medical Center, Germany
| | - Mathew V. Jones
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Madar AD, Ewell LA, Jones MV. Pattern separation of spiketrains in hippocampal neurons. Sci Rep 2019; 9:5282. [PMID: 30918288 PMCID: PMC6437159 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41503-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Pattern separation is a process that minimizes overlap between patterns of neuronal activity representing similar experiences. Theoretical work suggests that the dentate gyrus (DG) performs this role for memory processing but a direct demonstration is lacking. One limitation is the difficulty to measure DG inputs and outputs simultaneously. To rigorously assess pattern separation by DG circuitry, we used mouse brain slices to stimulate DG afferents and simultaneously record DG granule cells (GCs) and interneurons. Output spiketrains of GCs are more dissimilar than their input spiketrains, demonstrating for the first time temporal pattern separation at the level of single neurons in the DG. Pattern separation is larger in GCs than in fast-spiking interneurons and hilar mossy cells, and is amplified in CA3 pyramidal cells. Analysis of the neural noise and computational modelling suggest that this form of pattern separation is not explained by simple randomness and arises from specific presynaptic dynamics. Overall, by reframing the concept of pattern separation in dynamic terms and by connecting it to the physiology of different types of neurons, our study offers a new window of understanding in how hippocampal networks might support episodic memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine D Madar
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. .,Department of Neurobiology, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| | - Laura A Ewell
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.,Institute of Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn - Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mathew V Jones
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cayco-Gajic NA, Silver RA. Re-evaluating Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Pattern Separation. Neuron 2019; 101:584-602. [PMID: 30790539 PMCID: PMC7028396 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
When animals interact with complex environments, their neural circuits must separate overlapping patterns of activity that represent sensory and motor information. Pattern separation is thought to be a key function of several brain regions, including the cerebellar cortex, insect mushroom body, and dentate gyrus. However, recent findings have questioned long-held ideas on how these circuits perform this fundamental computation. Here, we re-evaluate the functional and structural mechanisms underlying pattern separation. We argue that the dimensionality of the space available for population codes representing sensory and motor information provides a common framework for understanding pattern separation. We then discuss how these three circuits use different strategies to separate activity patterns and facilitate associative learning in the presence of trial-to-trial variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Alex Cayco-Gajic
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - R Angus Silver
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zylberberg J, Strowbridge BW. Mechanisms of Persistent Activity in Cortical Circuits: Possible Neural Substrates for Working Memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 2017; 40:603-627. [PMID: 28772102 PMCID: PMC5995341 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-014006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A commonly observed neural correlate of working memory is firing that persists after the triggering stimulus disappears. Substantial effort has been devoted to understanding the many potential mechanisms that may underlie memory-associated persistent activity. These rely either on the intrinsic properties of individual neurons or on the connectivity within neural circuits to maintain the persistent activity. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which mechanisms are at play in the many brain areas involved in working memory. Herein, we first summarize the palette of different mechanisms that can generate persistent activity. We then discuss recent work that asks which mechanisms underlie persistent activity in different brain areas. Finally, we discuss future studies that might tackle this question further. Our goal is to bridge between the communities of researchers who study either single-neuron biophysical, or neural circuit, mechanisms that can generate the persistent activity that underlies working memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Zylberberg
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Neuroscience, and Computational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
- Learning in Machines and Brains Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8, Canada
| | - Ben W Strowbridge
- Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106;
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zylberberg J, Pouget A, Latham PE, Shea-Brown E. Robust information propagation through noisy neural circuits. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005497. [PMID: 28419098 PMCID: PMC5413111 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2016] [Revised: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Sensory neurons give highly variable responses to stimulation, which can limit the amount of stimulus information available to downstream circuits. Much work has investigated the factors that affect the amount of information encoded in these population responses, leading to insights about the role of covariability among neurons, tuning curve shape, etc. However, the informativeness of neural responses is not the only relevant feature of population codes; of potentially equal importance is how robustly that information propagates to downstream structures. For instance, to quantify the retina’s performance, one must consider not only the informativeness of the optic nerve responses, but also the amount of information that survives the spike-generating nonlinearity and noise corruption in the next stage of processing, the lateral geniculate nucleus. Our study identifies the set of covariance structures for the upstream cells that optimize the ability of information to propagate through noisy, nonlinear circuits. Within this optimal family are covariances with “differential correlations”, which are known to reduce the information encoded in neural population activities. Thus, covariance structures that maximize information in neural population codes, and those that maximize the ability of this information to propagate, can be very different. Moreover, redundancy is neither necessary nor sufficient to make population codes robust against corruption by noise: redundant codes can be very fragile, and synergistic codes can—in some cases—optimize robustness against noise. Information about the outside world, which originates in sensory neurons, propagates through multiple stages of processing before reaching the neural structures that control behavior. While much work in neuroscience has investigated the factors that affect the amount of information contained in peripheral sensory areas, very little work has asked how much of that information makes it through subsequent processing stages. That’s the focus of this paper, and it’s an important issue because information that fails to propagate cannot be used to affect decision-making. We find a tradeoff between information content and information transmission: neural codes which contain a large amount of information can transmit that information poorly to subsequent processing stages. Thus, the problem of robust information propagation—which has largely been overlooked in previous research—may be critical for determining how our sensory organs communicate with our brains. We identify the conditions under which information propagates well—or poorly—through multiple stages of neural processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Zylberberg
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Neuroscience, and Computational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Learning in Machines and Brains Program, Canadian Institute For Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Alexandre Pouget
- Department of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter E. Latham
- Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Shea-Brown
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington Institute for Neuroengineering, and Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|