Associations between statin use and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk and survival: a meta-analysis

Statin use, survival and incidence of thrombosis among older patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia

BACKGROUND

Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are linked to increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition to the reduction in of arterial thrombotic events, statins may prevent venous thrombosis including among patients with cancer. As previous registry- and claims-based studies revealed that the use of statins may improve the survival of patients with various malignancies we evaluated their impact on outcomes of older adults with PV and ET.

METHODS

We identified 4010 older adults (aged 66-99 years at diagnosis) with PV (n = 1809) and ET (n = 2201) in a population-based cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database with median follow-up of 3.92 (interquartile range: 2.58-5.75) years. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approaches were utilized to assess potential association between statins and overall survival. Multivariable competing risk models with death as a competing risk were used to evaluate possible relationship between statins and the incidence of thrombosis.

RESULTS

55.8% of the patients used statins within the first year after PV/ET diagnosis, and statin use was associated with a 22% reduction in all-cause mortality (PSM: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.98, p = 0.03; IPTW: HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.97, p = 0.03). Statins also reduced the risk of thrombosis in this patient population (PSM: HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.51-0.78, p < 0.01; IPTW: HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.49-0.66, p < 0.01) as well as in PV and ET subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that it may be important to incorporate statins into the therapeutic strategy for older adults with PV and ET.

Antitumor Activity of Simvastatin in Preclinical Models of Mantle Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that remains incurable with standard therapy. Statins are well-tolerated, inexpensive, and widely prescribed as cholesterol-lowering agents to treat hyperlipidemia and to prevent cardiovascular diseases through the blockage of the mevalonate metabolic pathway. These drugs have also shown promising anti-cancer activity through pleiotropic effects including the induction of lymphoma cell death. However, their potential use as anti-MCL agents has not been evaluated so far.

AIM

The present study aimed to investigate the activity of simvastatin on MCL cells.

METHODS

We evaluated the cytotoxicity of simvastatin in MCL cell lines by CellTiter-Glo and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assays. Cell proliferation and mitotic index were assessed by direct cell recounting and histone H3-pSer10 immunostaining. Apoptosis induction and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation were evaluated by flow cytometry. Cell migration and invasion properties were determined by transwell assay. The antitumoral effect of simvastatin in vivo was evaluated in a chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) MCL xenograft model.

RESULTS

We show that treatment with simvastatin induced a 2 to 6-fold LDH release, inhibited more than 50% of cell proliferation, and enhanced the caspase-independent ROS-mediated death of MCL cells. The effective impairment of MCL cell survival was accompanied by the inhibition of AKT and mTOR phosphorylation. Moreover, simvastatin strongly decreased MCL cell migration and invasion ability, leading to a 55% tumor growth inhibition and a consistent diminution of bone marrow and spleen metastasis in vivo.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, these data provide the first preclinical insight into the effect of simvastatin against MCL cells, suggesting that this agent might be considered for repurpose as a precise MCL therapy.

Can statins lessen the burden of virus mediated cancers?

BACKGROUND

Oncogenic viruses, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), and Kaposi Sarcoma Herpes virus (KSHV) contribute to a significant proportion of the world's cancers. Given the sizeable burden of virus mediated cancers, development of strategies to prevent and/or treat these cancers is critical. While large population studies suggest that treatment with hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, commonly known as statins, may reduce the risk of many cancer types including HBV/HCV related hepatocellular carcinoma, few studies have specifically evaluated the impact of statin use in populations at risk for other types of virus mediated cancers.

MAIN BODY

Studies of populations with HBV and HCV suggest a protective, dose-dependent effect of statins on hepatocellular carcinoma risk and support the theory that statins may offer clinical benefit if used as chemoprophylactic agents to reduce liver cancer incidence. However, no population level data exists describing the impact of statins on populations with other oncogenic viral infections, such as HPV, EBV, and KSHV.

CONCLUSION

Further study of statin use in diverse, global populations with or at high risk for oncogenic viral infections is essential to determine the impact of statin therapy on virus mediated cancer risk.

Factors Associated with Discontinuation of Statin Therapy in Patients with Lymphoma Aged 80 Years and Older: A Retrospective Single-Institute Study

Background

There is little evidence to support or negate the benefits of statin therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in lymphoma patients aged 80 years or older.

Objective

We evaluated comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) scores and previously reported risk factors for failure of statin therapy discontinuation in lymphoma patients aged 80 years and older with the aim of identifying those in whom discontinuation of statins for primary CVD prevention is indicated.

Patients and methods

Our study cohort comprised 50 patients aged 80 years and older treated with chemotherapy for lymphoma at our institute from January 2011 to July 2020. We retrospectively analyzed the associations between CGA, including Geriatric 8, instrumental activities of daily living, and Charlson comorbidity index, and previously reported factors associated with failure of statin therapy discontinuation, defined as reintroduction of statins after their discontinuation, in this patient cohort.

Results

Twenty years or less of statin therapy was an independent predictor of failure of statin therapy discontinuation (hazard ratio 8.240, 95% confidence interval 1.380–49.10). There were significant differences in the rate of failure of statin discontinuation between patients receiving statins for ≥ 20 years versus < 20 years (p = 0.010). Multivariate analysis of CGA-related scores identified no significant risk factors for failure of statin discontinuation.

Conclusions

Discontinuation of statin therapy may be indicated in lymphoma patients aged 80 years and older who have used statins for 20 years or more.

Influence of Statins on the Survival Outcomes of Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies evaluating the influence of statins on the survival of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) showed inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether statin use is correlated with the survival of DLBCL patients.

METHODS

Related cohort studies were obtained by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane's Library, and Web of Science databases. Study characteristics and outcome data were extracted independently by two authors. The random-effect model was used for meta-analysis, considering the possible influence of between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 9927 patients with DLBCL were included. Results did not show significant associations of statins with overall survival (OS, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69∼1.11, p=0.27; I ² = 60%) or progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72∼1.17, p=0.49; I ² = 23%) in these patients. Subgroup analyses suggested that statin was be associated with survival of DLBCL patients from Asia (HR for OS: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.91∼1.56, p=0.19, I ² = 2%; HR for PFS: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89∼1.44, p=0.33, I ² = 0%), but was associated with significantly improved survival of patients from Western countries (HR for OS: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66∼0.81, p < 0.001, I ² = 0%; for PFS, HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53∼0.96, p=0.03, I ² = 0%), which fully explained the heterogeneity (p for subgroup difference <0.05). Variables such as study design, patient age, and study quality were not shown to affect the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, statins did not affect the survival of patients with DLBCL. However, statin use may be associated with an improved survival rate of DLBCL patients from Western countries.

Effect of Statin Use on Inflammation and Immune Activation Biomarkers in HIV-Infected Persons on Effective Antiretroviral Therapy

Immune activation and inflammation are hallmarks of chronic HIV infection and are etiologically linked to major causes of morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected persons, including coronary artery disease and cancer. Systemic immune activation is dampened, but not resolved, with use of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Statins are cardioprotective drugs that also appear to have immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties. We sought to understand the association between statin use, cART, and levels of circulating immune markers in a longitudinal cohort study. From 2004 to 2009, statin use was ascertained in male participants of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) using interviewer-administered questionnaires. Twenty-four circulating markers of immune activation and inflammation were measured in archived serial samples from a subset of cohort members using multiplex assays. Propensity-adjusted generalized gamma models were used to compare biomarkers' distributions by statin use, and multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the effect of initiating statin on these biomarkers. Overall, 1,031 cART-exposed individuals with HIV infection were included in this study. Statin use was reported by 31.5% of cART-exposed participants. Compared to nonstatin users on cART, statin users on cART had lower levels of IP-10, IL-10, and IL-12p70, and the effect of statin use was decreased in participants using lipophilic statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, fluvastatin, or lovastatin); these results were statistically significant (p < .05). Among cART users not on aspirin, starting statins decreased levels of high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP), IL-12p70, and IL-6. Statin therapy is associated with reduced levels of certain biomarkers of immune activation and inflammation in cART users, which may contribute to a lower burden of disease.

Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and statin drugs may protect against the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but data are limited, particularly for NHL subtypes. Furthermore, some in vitro, animal and epidemiologic data suggest there may be a synergistic effect of these two agents, but there has been no test of this hypothesis in NHL. We evaluated the self-reported use of NSAIDs and statins in a clinic-based study of 1703 NHL patients and 2199 frequency-matched controls. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential confounding variables. We observed an inverse association of regular use of low-dose aspirin with risk of NHL (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.96) that was stronger with longer duration of use (P < .01). There were no associations for use of regular or extra-strength aspirin, ibuprofen, other NSAIDs, statins or other cholesterol-lowering drugs with NHL risk, while an inverse association with COX-2 inhibitors was equivocal. There was also no interaction of low-dose aspirin and statins on NHL risk. Inverse associations of similar magnitude to all NHL were observed for regular use of low-dose aspirin with diffuse large B-cell, follicular, marginal zone and all other lymphomas, although not all associations were statistically significant. In conclusion, low-dose aspirin but not regular/extra strength aspirin, other NSAIDs or statin use was associated with lower risk of NHL. Beyond the potential for the primary prevention of NHL, these data also point to a role of anti-platelet or other effects of low-dose aspirin in lymphomagenesis that warrant follow-up.

An Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group study of statin use and endometrial cancer prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether statin use by endometrial cancer patients was associated with a survival advantage.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review study, by the Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group, of consecutive endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgery in one of 11 medical centers between 2002 and 2014. Clinical and pathological reports, and measures of survival were compared between statin users and nonusers. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effect of using statins on survival measures.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 6.2 years (range, 1-12 years) for 2017 endometrial cancer patients with complete data, 663 (32.8%) used statins prior to diagnosis and 1354 (67.1%) did not. No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed for most demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference between statin users and nonusers in 5-year recurrence-free survival (82% vs 83%; P=0.508), disease-specific survival (86% vs 84%; P=0.549), or overall survival (77% vs 75%; P=0.901).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with endometrial cancer, no significant associations were found between use of statins and endometrial cancer survival.

Statin Use and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Incidence: A Nested Case-Control Study in Manitoba, Canada

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have reported reduced risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) among statin users. However, the possibility that the effect of statins may differ by their chemical or pharmacodynamic properties has not been investigated.

METHODS

In this nested case-control study, all Manitobans ages ≥40 years when diagnosed with CLL (as a first cancer) from 1999 to 2014 (n = 1,385) were matched (on gender, age, residence, and duration of insurance coverage) to cancer-free controls (n = 6,841). Using conditional logistic regression, statin use was analyzed by individual statins and groups: hydrophilic, low-potency lipophilic (fluvastatin and lovastatin), and high-potency lipophilic statins.

RESULTS

Statin users constituted 27% and 28% of the CLL cases and controls, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounding by indication, patterns of healthcare utilization, and use of other drugs, CLL incidence was not associated with use of hydrophilic [odds ratio (OR) = 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.34] or high-potency lipophilic (OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.11) statins. Low-potency lipophilic statins were associated with a lower risk of CLL (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92), with stronger association (OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88) observed with more regular use (half to full standard dose on average).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association between low-potency lipophilic statin use and reduced CLL risk, with a possible dose-response effect.

IMPACT

Although requiring replication in future studies, our findings suggest that the effect of statins on CLL risk may depend on their specific chemical or pharmacodynamic properties.

Effect of Statin on Cancer Incidence: An Umbrella Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Statins are reported to reduce the risk of cancer, but the results of various published studies have been contradictory. We carried out an umbrella review to provide an overview and understand the strength of evidence, extent of potential biases, and validity of claimed associations between the use of statins and cancer incidence. We comprehensively re-analyzed the data of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on associations between statin use and cancer incidence. We also assessed the strength of evidence of the re-analyzed outcomes, which were determined from the criteria including statistical significance of the p-value of random-effects, as well as fixed-effects meta-analyses, small study effects, between-study heterogeneity, and a 95% prediction interval. Using a conventional method to assess the significance of meta-analysis (p-value < 0.05), statins had a statistically significant effect on reducing cancer incidence in 10 of 18 types of cancer. When we graded the level of evidence, no cancer type showed convincing evidence, and four cancers (esophageal cancer, hematological cancer, leukemia, and liver cancer) showed suggestive evidence of a preventive effect. There was weak evidence of an association with six cancers, and no significance for the remaining eight cancers. None of the meta-analyses of RCTs on the association of statin and cancer incidence showed a statistical significance. Although there was a preventive effect of statin on cancer incidence in 10 of the 18 cancer types, the evidence supporting the use of statins to reduce cancer incidence was low. Therefore, the associations between statin use and cancer incidence should be carefully considered by clinicians.

Associations between statin use and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphomas by subtype

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are a group of cancers with highly heterogeneous biology and clinical features. Statins are increasingly prescribed to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Early evidence shows a preventive effect of statins for some cancers, but their effect on NHL risk is unclear. We conducted a population-based nested case-control study involving 5,541 NHL cases and 27,315 controls matched for gender, age, place of residence and length of period of available prescription drug data. We assessed the use of statins prior to diagnosis (excluding the 12 months prior to the index date). We used conditional logistic regression models to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for use of any statin, adjusting for medical conditions, number of family physician visits for 5 years prior to index date, healthcare utilization, income and use of other medications. Over one-quarter of cases and controls were prescribed statins. Ever-use of any statin was associated with lower risk of Total NHL (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.89) and of certain subtypes including diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL, OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.92), plasma cell neoplasms (PCN, OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.91) and other B-cell NHL (0.75, 0.59-0.95). Analysis by statin type suggested that the association was limited to high potency statin and lipophilic statin users. No clear duration or dose-response relationships were observed. Our findings provide evidence that statin use can reduce the risk of DLBCL and plasma cell lymphomas, but not other NHL types. Further studies are warranted to verify these associations and to examine the biological mechanisms.

Statin use and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Several studies have evaluated the association between statin use and endometrial cancer risk. We carried out a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies to evaluate the effect of statins on endometrial cancer risk. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, conference abstracts and clinical trial registers was conducted for published and unpublished results. Studies that evaluated exposure to statins and endometrial cancer risk were considered. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model. Two RCTs and eleven non-randomized studies (four cohort and seven case-control studies) involving 9,517 cases of endometrial cancer were included in the analysis. There was no evidence of an association between statin use and endometrial cancer risk either among RCTs (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.19 to 2.67) or among non-randomized studies (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.07). Combined analysis of all included studies also showed that statin use did not significantly affect endometrial cancer risk (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.07). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of our results. Our findings do not support a protective effect of statins against endometrial cancer at the population level.