Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with hematologic malignancies

Clinical and biological advances of critical complications in acute myeloid leukemia

Managing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and its critical complications requires understanding the complex interplay between disease biology, treatment strategies, and patient characteristics. Complications like sepsis, acute respiratory failure (ARF), hyperleukocytosis, coagulopathy, tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and central nervous system (CNS) involvement present unique challenges needing precise evaluation and tailored interventions. Venetoclax-induced TLS and differentiation syndrome (DS) from IDH1/IDH2 or menin inhibitors highlight the need for ongoing research and innovative approaches. As the microbiological landscape evolves and new therapeutic agents emerge, adapting strategies to mitigate harmful pharmacological interactions is crucial. Advances in understanding the genetic profiles of patients with hyperleukocytosis contribute to better-targeted therapeutic strategies. Effective AML management relies on collaborative efforts from hematologists, specialized services, and intensive care units (ICUs). This review analyzes recent data on critical AML complications, identifies areas for further investigation, and proposes ways to advance clinical research and enhance patient care strategies.

Impact of atrial fibrillation in onco-hematological patients in Europe: a targeted literature review

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication in cancer patients, and the increased risk associated with certain therapies poses a major challenge. The objective was to determine the clinical and economic burden of AF in onco-hematological patients in Europe.

AREAS COVERED

A targeted literature review was completed for observational, retrospective and case studies, and reviews on AF in onco-hematology published between January 2010 and 2022 in PubMed, Science Direct, Medes and IBECS. The search was based on epidemiology, cost, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), disease burden and management, and patient journey. Thirty-one studies fulfilled eligibility criteria. Annual incidence of AF during treatment varies up to 25%, and increased with first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Risk factors include age ≥65, prior AF or hypertension, hyperlipidemia and ibrutinib use. Complications are managed with anticoagulants and/or antiarrhythmics, and regular monitoring. When AF is no longer controllable, dose reduction or discontinuation is recommended. No data on costs, HRQoL and patient journey were identified.

EXPERT OPINION

There is scarce and heterogeneous information on AF in onco-hematology in Europe. Available evidence reports a higher risk of AF associated with first-generation BTKi. Further studies are needed to understand the burden of AF in these patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and hematological malignancies

Data are needed on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hematological malignancies (HM). Retrospective studies to date lacked a control group and did not focus on patients with VTE. Out aim was to assess the incidence of VTE recurrence and bleeding in HM patients treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or DOACs for acute VTE. This is a retrospective cohort study including patients with active HM and newly-diagnosed VTE, indexed on the first day of anticoagulation and followed for 12 months. The outcome was a composite of recurrent VTE, major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Cumulative incidence [95% confidence interval (CI)] was calculated for each anticoagulation group (LMWH, DOAC) and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using cox-proportional hazards model, with death as a competing risk. 143 HM patients treated with LMWH (96) or DOACs (47) for acute VTE were included. The most common HM types were lymphoma in 83 (58%) and plasma cell dyscrasia in 32 (22.3%). The 12-month cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 24.2% (95% CI 15.9-33.5%; n = 22) in the LMWH group and 18.5% (8.5-31.5%; n = 8) in the DOAC group (HR 1.51 [0.695-3.297]). Two recurrent VTE occurred (both in the DOAC group while off-treatment). Nine (9.4%) LMWH-treated patients had major bleeding compared to 1 (2.1%) DOAC-treated patient (HR 4.85 [0.64-36.56]). This study generates the hypothesis that DOACs may be a safe and effective alternative to LMWH for VTE in patients with HM types represented in the study.

Cardio-Oncology Drug Interactions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

In the cardio-oncology population, drug interactions are of particular importance given the complex pharmacological profile, narrow therapeutic index, and inherent risk of therapies used to manage cardiovascular disease and cancer. Drug interactions may be beneficial or detrimental to the desired therapeutic effect. Clinicians in both cardiology and oncology should be cognizant of these potential drug-drug interactions that may reduce the efficacy or safety of either cardiovascular or cancer therapies. These risks can be mitigated through increased recognition of potential drug-drug interaction, use of alternative medications when possible, and careful monitoring. This scientific statement provides clinicians with an overview of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in patients with cancer exposed to common cardiovascular and cancer medications.

Anticoagulation in special patient populations with atrial fibrillation

Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) should be guided by considerations of the risk of thromboembolism, stroke, and bleeding as well as the patient's preference. Well-recognized scores have been developed to help the clinician in daily risk assessment, but there are several special patient populations for whom scores are not developed or validated. Furthermore, these patients were not adequately represented in the pivotal randomized trials for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). In patients with cancer, the intrinsic hypercoagulable state has to be balanced against an increased risk of bleeding, and a dynamic concept should be applied, taking into account the cancer type, current disease state, therapeutic strategy, and patient-related factors, with NOACs playing an increasingly larger role. In women with planned pregnancy or already pregnant, NOACs should be avoided. However, accidental exposure during pregnancy should not lead to recommendations for pregnancy termination in view of current observational data. Whether patients on dialysis with AF benefit from anticoagulation at all is questionable. But if the decision for anticoagulation is made, NOACs may contribute to a more favorable risk-benefit profile than vitamin- K antagonists. Finally, patients on the ward deserve special considerations regarding periprocedural management of anticoagulation. Although for the majority of procedures a short discontinuation of oral anticoagulation seems appropriate, there are some low-bleeding-risk procedures that do not require cessation. The aim of the present review is to discuss the major particularities of these four patient subgroups and thus to facilitate the clinical decision-making.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma: where are we and where are we going?

Venous thromboembolism is a common complication of patients with hematologic malignancies, due both to release of procoagulant factors by tumor cells and to external factors, such us drugs. In multiple myeloma patients, the risk is increased by use of immunomodulants, especially when associated to multidrug therapy, during the induction phase. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in myeloma patients is highly recommended but specific guidelines are still lacking. The most common approach is to stratify the thrombotic risk according to individual, myeloma-related and therapy-related risk factors and to use aspirin for all patients, except those with two or more thrombotic risk factors who should be treated with traditional oral or parenteral anticoagulant. A more controversial approach indicates for prophylaxis either anticoagulant or aspirin, regardless of risk stratification. Recent trials investigate prophylaxis in myeloma patients with direct oral anticoagulants, based on studies showing efficacy and safety of this new class of drugs in the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with any malignancy. The results of these trials are encouraging but they need to be confirmed by larger studies. An international consensus about best prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma on treatment is still missing. Therefore, thrombosis in multiple myeloma remains an ongoing issue.