1
|
Bianchi E, Reddingius PF, Rathore M, Lindfield D, Crabb DP, Jones PR. Pushing the envelope: the feasibility of using a mailed contrast sensitivity test to prioritise cataract waiting lists. Eye (Lond) 2024:10.1038/s41433-024-03081-6. [PMID: 38802486 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03081-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cataract waiting lists are growing globally. Pragmatic, cost-effective methods are required to prioritise the most urgent cases. Here we investigate the feasibility of using a third-party pen-and-paper contrast sensitivity, CS, test (SpotChecksTM), delivered by mail, and performed by patients at home unsupervised, to flag eyes requiring surgery. METHODS Pen-and-paper CS tests were mailed to 233 people waiting for a cataract assessment, along with a prepaid return envelope (cross-sectional study). Response rates were tabulated (stratified by age, sex and socioeconomic status), and test scores analysed to see how well the home tests predicted which eyes were listed subsequently for surgery. A subset of patients (N = 39) also underwent in-person follow-up testing, to confirm the accuracy of the home data. RESULTS Forty-six percent of patients responded (216 eyes). No gross differences were observed between respondents and non-respondents, either in terms of age, sex, socioeconomic status, or geographic location (all P > 0.05). The home-test CS scores predicted which eyes were subsequently listed for surgery, with an AUROC {±CI95%} of 0.69 {0.61-0.76}. Predictive performance was further-improved when machine learning was used to combine CS scores with letter acuity, extracted from patients' medical records (AUROC {±CI95%} = 0.77 {0.70-0.83}). Among 39 patients who underwent follow-up testing, home CS scores were correlated with various measures made in clinic: biometry signal-to-noise (P = 0.032), LogMAR acuity, Pelli-Robson CS and SpotChecks CS (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Mailing patients pen-and-paper CS tests may be a feasible, 'low-tech' way of prioritising patients on cataract waiting lists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Bianchi
- Glaucoma Services, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Peter F Reddingius
- Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England
| | - Mehal Rathore
- Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England
| | - Dan Lindfield
- Glaucoma Services, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - David P Crabb
- Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England
| | - Pete R Jones
- Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Simpson AN, Gomez D, Baxter NN, Miazga E, Urbach D, Ramlakhan J, Sorvari AM, Sherif A, Gagliardi AR. Patient, family and professional suggestions for pandemic-related surgical backlog recovery: a qualitative study. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E255-E266. [PMID: 36918209 PMCID: PMC10019322 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical shutdowns related to the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in prolonged wait times for nonemergency surgery. We aimed to understand informational needs and generate suggestions on management of the surgical backlog in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic through focus groups with key stakeholders. METHODS We performed a qualitative study with focus groups held between Sept. 29 and Nov. 30, 2021, in Ontario, with patients who underwent or were awaiting surgery during the pandemic and their family members, and health care leaders with experience or influence overseeing the delivery of surgical services. We conducted the focus groups virtually; focus groups for patients and family members were conducted separately from health care leaders to ensure participants could speak freely about their experiences. Our goal was to elicit information on the impact of communication about the surgical backlog, how this communication may be improved, and to generate and prioritize suggestions to address the backlog. Data were mapped onto 2 complementary frameworks that categorized approaches to reduction in wait times and strategies to improve health care delivery. RESULTS A total of 11 patients and family members and 20 health care leaders (7 nursing surgical directors, 10 surgeons and 3 administrators) participated in 7 focus groups (2 patient and family, and 5 health care leader). Participants reported receiving conflicting information about the surgical backlog. Suggestions for communication about the backlog included unified messaging from a single source with clear language to educate the public. Participants prioritized the following suggestions for surgical recovery: increase supply through focusing on system efficiencies and maintaining or increasing health care personnel; incorporate patient-centred outcomes into triage definitions; and refine strategies for performance management to understand and measure inequities between surgeons and centres, and consider the impact of funding incentives on "nonpriority" procedures. INTERPRETATION Patients and their families and health care leaders experienced a lack of communication about the surgical backlog and suggested this information should come from a single source; key suggestions to manage the surgical backlog included a focus on system efficiencies, incorporation of patient-centred outcomes into triage definitions, and improving the measurement of wait times to monitor health system performance. The suggestions generated in this study that may be used to address surgical backlog recovery in the Canadian setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea N Simpson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Gomez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Miazga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Urbach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jessica Ramlakhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne M Sorvari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alawia Sherif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ziolkowski N, Rogowsky L, Innis J, Grant Buechner A, Springall E, Dengler J. Creation of a nationwide breastfeeding policy for surgical residents: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e047466. [PMID: 35697452 PMCID: PMC9196187 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast feeding is recommended for the first year of a baby's life due to numerous benefits for both the child and mother. After returning from maternity leave, surgical trainees face extensive barriers to breast feeding and tend to terminate breast feeding earlier than guideline recommendations. The aim of this scoping review is to assess existing breastfeeding policies for surgical trainees at the national level including postgraduate medical education offices, provincial resident unions and individual surgical programmes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A modified Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework will be used. Specifically, (1) identifying the research question/s and (2) relevant studies from electronic databases and grey literature, (3) identifying and (4) selecting studies with independent verification, and (5) collating, summarising, and reporting data while having ongoing consultation between experts throughout the process. Experts will include a lactation consultant (AGB), a human resource leader (JI), a health information specialist (ES), two independent coders (NZ, LR) and a board-certified surgeon (JD). This work will take place as of December 2020 and be carried out to completion in 2021. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval will not be sought for this scoping review. Research findings will be disseminated through publications, presentations and meetings with relevant stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Ziolkowski
- Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Larissa Rogowsky
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Julia Innis
- Human Resources Professionals Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Grant Buechner
- Nutmeg Consulting, International Board Certified Lactation Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elena Springall
- University of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jana Dengler
- Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rathnayake D, Clarke M, Jayasinghe V. Patient prioritisation methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: A systematic review of how to improve access to surgery. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256578. [PMID: 34460854 PMCID: PMC8404982 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concern about long waiting times for elective surgeries is not a recent phenomenon, but it has been heightened by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated measures. One way to alleviate the problem might be to use prioritisation methods for patients on the waiting list and a wide range of research is available on such methods. However, significant variations and inconsistencies have been reported in prioritisation protocols from various specialties, institutions, and health systems. To bridge the evidence gap in existing literature, this comprehensive systematic review will synthesise global evidence on policy strategies with a unique insight to patient prioritisation methods to reduce waiting times for elective surgeries. This will provide evidence that might help with the tremendous burden of surgical disease that is now apparent in many countries because of operations that were delayed or cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic and inform policy for sustainable healthcare management systems. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with our most recent searches in January 2020. Articles published after 2013 on major elective surgery lists of adult patients were eligible, but cancer and cancer-related surgeries were excluded. Both randomised and non-randomised studies were eligible and the quality of studies was assessed with ROBINS-I and CASP tools. We registered the review in PROSPERO (CRD42019158455) and reported it in accordance with the PRISMA statement. RESULTS The electronic search in five bibliographic databases yielded 7543 records (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane) and 17 eligible articles were identified in the screening. There were four quasi-experimental studies, 11 observational studies and two systematic reviews. These demonstrated moderate to low risk of bias in their research methods. Three studies tested generic approaches using common prioritisation systems for all elective surgeries in common. The other studies assessed specific prioritisation approaches for re-ordering the waiting list for a particular surgical specialty. CONCLUSIONS Explicit prioritisation tools with a standardised scoring system based on clear evidence-based criteria are likely to reduce waiting times and improve equitable access to health care. Multiple attributes need to be considered in defining a fair prioritisation system to overcome limitations with local variations and discriminations. Collating evidence from a diverse body of research provides a single framework to improve the quality and efficiency of elective surgical care provision in a variety of health settings. Universal prioritisation tools with vertical and horizontal equity would help with re-ordering patients on waiting lists for elective surgery and reduce waiting times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimuthu Rathnayake
- Centre of Public Health, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Clarke
- Centre of Public Health, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Viraj Jayasinghe
- South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gagliardi AR, Yip CYY, Irish J, Wright FC, Rubin B, Ross H, Green R, Abbey S, McAndrews MP, Stewart DE. The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Health Expect 2021; 24:978-990. [PMID: 33769657 PMCID: PMC8235883 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Waiting for procedures delayed by COVID-19 may cause anxiety and related adverse consequences. OBJECTIVE To synthesize research on the mental health impact of waiting and patient-centred mitigation strategies that could be applied in the COVID-19 context. METHODS Using a scoping review approach, we searched 9 databases for studies on waiting lists and mental health and reported study characteristics, impacts and intervention attributes and outcomes. RESULTS We included 51 studies that focussed on organ transplant (60.8%), surgery (21.6%) or cancer management (13.7%). Most patients and caregivers reported anxiety, depression and poor quality of life, which deteriorated with increasing wait time. The impact of waiting on mental health was greater among women and new immigrants, and those of younger age, lower socio-economic status, or with less-positive coping ability. Six studies evaluated educational strategies to develop coping skills: 2 reduced depression (2 did not), 1 reduced anxiety (2 did not) and 2 improved quality of life (2 did not). In contrast, patients desired acknowledgement of concerns, peer support, and periodic communication about wait-list position, prioritization criteria and anticipated procedure date. CONCLUSIONS Findings revealed patient-centred strategies to alleviate the mental health impact of waiting for procedures. Ongoing research should explore how to optimize the impact of those strategies for diverse patients and caregivers, particularly in the COVID-19 context. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Six patients and four caregivers waiting for COVID-19-delayed procedures helped to establish eligibility criteria, plan data extraction and review a draft and final report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R. Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | | | - Jonathan Irish
- Surgical Oncology Program/Access to Care‐SurgeryOntario Health‐Cancer Care OntarioTorontoCanada
| | | | - Barry Rubin
- Peter Munk Cardiac CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Heather Ross
- Ted Rogers Centre of Excellence in Heart FunctionUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Robin Green
- Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Susan Abbey
- Medical Psychiatry & Psychosocial OncologyUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | | | - Donna E. Stewart
- University Health Network Centre for Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rathnayake D, Clarke M. The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:155. [PMID: 33596882 PMCID: PMC7887721 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06140-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455. RESULTS The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics. CONCLUSIONS The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimuthu Rathnayake
- Center for Public Health, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science Block A, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
| | - Mike Clarke
- Center for Public Health, School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science Block A, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|