1
|
Gengeswaran N, Brandwood A, Anderson NN, Ramlakhan JU, Gagliardi AR. Do clinical guidelines support person-centred care for women affected by dementia: A content analysis. Dementia (London) 2024; 23:525-549. [PMID: 38567809 PMCID: PMC11059842 DOI: 10.1177/14713012241244982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia disproportionately affects women including persons living with dementia and caregivers. Person-centered care, rather than disease-focused, is recommended to improve care for affected persons including caregivers. General practitioners play a central role in dementia care but find it challenging due to inadequate training. The study aimed to assess if and how dementia guidelines provide clinicians with guidance on person-centred care for women affected by dementia. METHODS We searched for publicly available English-language guidelines on the overall management of dementia in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Guidelines International Network repository. We employed deductive and summative content analysis, and categorized person-centered care guideline content based on established frameworks, and conveyed our results using summary statistics, text, and tables. RESULTS We reviewed 15 guidelines published from 2006 to 2020 in eight countries. Few (4, 23%) involved persons living with dementia or caregivers in guideline development. Regarding general person-centred care, guidelines mostly addressed the domains of exchange information (93%), share decisions (93%), enable self-management (93%) and address emotions (87%), while few offered content on manage uncertainty (33%) or foster a healing relationship (13%). Regarding dementia-specific person-centred care, most guidelines addressed intersectionality (tailoring care for diverse characteristics) (80%), but few included content on the domains of quality of life (67%), dignity (53%) or sex/gender issues (20%). Even when mentioned, the guidance was typically brief. We identified 32 general and 18 dementia-specific strategies to achieve person-centered care by compiling information from these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS This study identified inconsistent and insufficient guideline content on person-centred care for women with dementia. Compiled strategies for achieving person-centred care could be used by developers to enhance existing and future dementia guidelines; and inform the development of policies or programs, education, tools for clinicians, and quality improvement measures for evaluating dementia care. Future research is crucial for promoting person-centred dementia care for women living with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nevetda Gengeswaran
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Alec Brandwood
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Jessica U Ramlakhan
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abbaticchio A, Theodorlis M, Marshall D, MacKay C, Borkhoff CM, Hazlewood GS, Battistella M, Lofters A, Ahluwalia V, Gagliardi AR. Policies in Canada fail to address disparities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: a content analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:522. [PMID: 38664819 PMCID: PMC11044343 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10966-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women are disproportionately impacted by osteoarthritis (OA) but less likely than men to access OA care, particularly racialized women. One way to reduce inequities is through policies that can influence healthcare services. We examined how OA-relevant policies in Canada address equitable, person-centred OA care for women. METHODS We used content analysis to extract data from English-language OA-relevant documents referred to as policies or other synonymous terms published in 2000 or later identified by searching governmental and other web sites. We used summary statistics to describe policy characteristics, person-centred care using McCormack's six-domain framework, and mention of OA prevalence, barriers and strategies to improve equitable access to OA care among women. RESULTS We included 14 policies developed from 2004 to 2021. None comprehensively addressed all person-centred care domains, and few addressed individual domains: enable self-management (50%), share decisions (43%), exchange information (29%), respond to emotions (14%), foster a healing relationship (0%) and manage uncertainty (0%). Even when mentioned, content offered little guidance for how to achieve person-centred OA care. Few policies acknowledged greater prevalence of OA among women (36%), older (29%) or Indigenous persons (29%) and those of lower socioeconomic status (14%); or barriers to OA care among those of lower socioeconomic status (50%), in rural areas (43%), of older age (37%) or ethno-cultural groups (21%), or women (21%). Four (29%) policies recommended strategies for improving access to OA care at the patient (self-management education material in different languages and tailored to cultural norms), clinician (healthcare professional education) and system level (evaluate OA service equity, engage lay health leaders in delivering self-management programs, and offer self-management programs in a variety of formats). Five (36%) policies recommended research on how to improve OA care for equity-seeking groups. CONCLUSIONS Canadian OA-relevant policies lack guidance to overcome disparities in access to person-centred OA care for equity-seeking groups including women. This study identified several ways to strengthen policies. Ongoing research must identify the needs and preferences of equity-seeking persons with OA, and evaluate the impact of various models of service delivery, knowledge needed to influence OA-relevant policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Abbaticchio
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Madeline Theodorlis
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | | | | | - Cornelia M Borkhoff
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Marisa Battistella
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iziduh S, Abenoja A, Theodorlis M, Ahluwalia V, Battistella M, Borkhoff CM, Hazlewood GS, Lofters A, MacKay C, Marshall DA, Gagliardi AR. Priority strategies to reduce socio-gendered inequities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: Delphi survey. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080301. [PMID: 38373862 PMCID: PMC10897840 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Osteoarthritis (OA) prevalence, severity and related comorbid conditions are greater among women compared with men, but women, particularly racialised women, are less likely than men to access OA care. We aimed to prioritise strategies needed to reduce inequities in OA management. DESIGN Delphi survey of 28 strategies derived from primary research retained if at least 80% of respondents rated 6 or 7 on a 7-point Likert scale. SETTING Online. PARTICIPANTS 35 women of diverse ethno-cultural groups and 29 healthcare professionals of various specialties from across Canada. RESULTS Of the 28 initial and 3 newly suggested strategies, 27 achieved consensus to retain: 20 in round 1 and 7 in round 2. Respondents retained 7 patient-level, 7 clinician-level and 13 system-level strategies. Women and professionals agreed on all but one patient-level strategy (eg, consider patients' cultural needs and economic circumstances) and all clinician-level strategies (eg, inquire about OA management needs and preferences). Some discrepancies emerged for system-level strategies that were more highly rated by women (eg, implement OA-specific clinics). Comments revealed general support among professionals for system-level strategies provided that additional funding or expanded scope of practice was targeted to only formally trained professionals and did not reduce funding for professionals who already managed OA. CONCLUSIONS We identified multilevel strategies that could be implemented by healthcare professionals, organisations or systems to mitigate inequities and improve OA care for diverse women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Iziduh
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Abenoja
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madeline Theodorlis
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vandana Ahluwalia
- William Osler Health System - Brampton Civic Hospital, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marisa Battistella
- University of Toronto Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cornelia M Borkhoff
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Deborah A Marshall
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adi-Wauran E, Clausen M, Shickh S, Gagliardi AR, Denburg A, Oldfield LE, Sam J, Reble E, Krishnapillai S, Regier DA, Baxter NN, Dawson L, Penney LS, Foulkes W, Basik M, Sun S, Schrader KA, Karsan A, Pollett A, Pugh TJ, Kim RH, Bombard Y. "I just wanted more": Hereditary cancer syndromes patients' perspectives on the utility of circulating tumour DNA testing for cancer screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:176-181. [PMID: 37821757 PMCID: PMC10853540 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01473-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) predispose individuals to a higher risk of developing multiple cancers. However, current screening strategies have limited ability to screen for all cancer risks. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) detects DNA fragments shed by tumour cells in the bloodstream and can potentially detect cancers early. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on ctDNA's utility to help inform its clinical adoption and implementation. We conducted a qualitative interpretive description study using semi-structured phone interviews. Participants were purposively sampled adult HCS patients recruited from a Canadian HCS research consortium. Thirty HCS patients were interviewed (n = 19 women, age range 20s-70s, n = 25 were white). Participants were highly concerned about developing cancers, particularly those without reliable screening options for early detection. They "just wanted more" than their current screening strategies. Participants were enthusiastic about ctDNA's potential to be comprehensive (detect multiple cancers), predictive (detect cancers early) and tailored (lead to personalized clinical management). Participants also acknowledged ctDNA's potential limitations, including false positives/negatives risks and experiencing additional anxiety. However, they saw ctDNA's potential benefits outweighing its limitations. In conclusion, participants' belief in ctDNA's potential to improve their care overshadowed its limitations, indicating patients' support for using ctDNA in HCS care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Adi-Wauran
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Avram Denburg
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Leslie E Oldfield
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jordan Sam
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Emma Reble
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Suvetha Krishnapillai
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lesa Dawson
- Memorial University, St. John's, Canada
- Eastern Health Authority, St. John's, Canada
| | | | - William Foulkes
- McGill University, Montréal, Canada
- Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- McGill University, Montréal, Canada
- Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Canada
| | - Sophie Sun
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Aly Karsan
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Trevor J Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Simpson AN, Baxter NN, Sorvari A, Boury H, Shore EM, Bogler T, Campbell D, Gagliardi AR. Strategies to support maternal and early childhood wellness: insight from parent and provider qualitative interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079479. [PMID: 38272559 PMCID: PMC10824034 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in rapid changes to the delivery of maternal and newborn care. Our aim was to gain an understanding from parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs) of how the pandemic and associated public health restrictions impacted the peripartum and postpartum experience, as well as longer-term health and well-being of families. DESIGN Qualitative study through focus groups. SETTING Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS HCPs and parents who had a child born during the COVID-19 pandemic. INTERVENTIONS Semistructured interview guide, with questions focused on how the pandemic impacted their care/their ability to provide care, and strategies to improve care and support now or in future situations with similar healthcare restrictions. OUTCOME MEASURES Thematic analysis was used to describe participant experiences and recommendations. RESULTS We included 11 HCPs and 15 parents in 6 focus groups. Participants described their experiences as 'traumatic', with difficulties in accessing prenatal and postpartum services, and feelings of distress and isolation. They also noted delays in speech and development in children born during the pandemic. Key recommendations included the provision of partner accompaniment throughout the course of care, expansion of available services for young families (particularly postpartum), and special considerations for marginalised groups, including access to technology for virtual care or the option of in-person visits. CONCLUSIONS Our findings may inform the development of healthcare system and organisational policies to ensure the provision of maternal and newborn care in the event of future public health emergencies. Of primary importance to the participants was the accommodation of antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum partner accompaniment, and the provision of postpartum services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea N Simpson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- St. Michael's Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- The University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne Sorvari
- St. Michael's Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Himani Boury
- Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eliane M Shore
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- St. Michael's Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tali Bogler
- St. Michael's Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas Campbell
- St. Michael's Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gagliardi AR, Abbaticchio A, Theodorlis M, Marshall D, MacKay C, Borkhoff CM, Hazlewood GS, Battistella M, Lofters A, Ahluwalia V. Multi-level strategies to improve equitable timely person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: qualitative interviews with women and healthcare professionals. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:207. [PMID: 37803475 PMCID: PMC10559457 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-02026-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women are more likely to develop osteoarthritis (OA), and have greater OA pain and disability compared with men, but are less likely to receive guideline-recommended management, particularly racialized women. OA care of diverse women, and strategies to improve the quality of their OA care is understudied. The purpose of this study was to explore strategies to overcome barriers of access to OA care for diverse women. METHODS We conducted qualitative interviews with key informants and used content analysis to identify themes regarding what constitutes person-centred OA care, barriers of OA care, and strategies to support equitable timely access to person-centred OA care. RESULTS We interviewed 27 women who varied by ethno-cultural group (e.g. African or Caribbean Black, Chinese, Filipino, Indian, Pakistani, Caucasian), age, region of Canada, level of education, location of OA and years with OA; and 31 healthcare professionals who varied by profession (e.g. family physician, nurse practitioner, community pharmacist, physio- and occupational therapists, chiropractors, healthcare executives, policy-makers), career stage, region of Canada and type of organization. Participants within and across groups largely agreed on approaches for person-centred OA care across six domains: foster a healing relationship, exchange information, address emotions, manage uncertainty, share decisions and enable self-management. Participants identified 22 barriers of access and 18 strategies to overcome barriers at the patient- (e.g. educational sessions and materials that accommodate cultural norms offered in different languages and formats for persons affected by OA), healthcare professional- (e.g. medical and continuing education on OA and on providing OA care tailored to intersectional factors) and system- (e.g. public health campaigns to raise awareness of OA, and how to prevent and manage it; self-referral to and public funding for therapy, greater number and ethno-cultural diversity of healthcare professionals, healthcare policies that address the needs of diverse women, dedicated inter-professional OA clinics, and a national strategy to coordinate OA care) levels. CONCLUSIONS This research contributes to a gap in knowledge of how to optimize OA care for disadvantaged groups including diverse women. Ongoing efforts are needed to examine how best to implement these strategies, which will require multi-sector collaboration and must engage diverse women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada.
| | - Angelina Abbaticchio
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Madeline Theodorlis
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Deborah Marshall
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary Alberta T2N1N4, Canada
| | - Crystal MacKay
- West Park Healthcare Centre, 82 Buttonwood Ave, York, M6M2J5, Canada
| | - Cornelia M Borkhoff
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Marisa Battistella
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abuwa C, Abbaticchio A, Theodorlis M, Marshall D, MacKay C, Borkhoff CM, Hazlewood GS, Battistella M, Lofters A, Ahluwalia V, Gagliardi AR. Identifying strategies that support equitable person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: content analysis of guidelines. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:734. [PMID: 37710195 PMCID: PMC10500823 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06877-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women are disproportionately impacted by osteoarthritis (OA) but less likely than men to access early diagnosis and management, or experience OA care tailored through person-centred approaches to their needs and preferences, particularly racialized women. One way to support clinicians in optimizing OA care is through clinical guidelines. We aimed to examine the content of OA guidelines for guidance on providing equitable, person-centred care to disadvantaged groups including women. METHODS We searched indexed databases and websites for English-language OA-relevant guidelines published in 2000 or later by non-profit organizations. We used manifest content analysis to extract data, and summary statistics and text to describe guideline characteristics, person-centred care (PCC) using a six-domain PCC framework, OA prevalence or barriers by intersectional factors, and strategies to improve equitable access to OA care. RESULTS We included 36 OA guidelines published from 2003 to 2021 in 8 regions or countries. Few (39%) development panels included patients. While most (81%) guidelines included at least one PCC domain, guidance was often brief or vague, few addressed exchange information, respond to emotions and manage uncertainty, and none referred to fostering a healing relationship. Few (39%) guidelines acknowledged or described greater prevalence of OA among particular groups; only 3 (8%) noted that socioeconomic status was a barrier to OA care, and only 2 (6%) offered guidance to clinicians on how to improve equitable access to OA care: assess acceptability, availability, accessibility, and affordability of self-management interventions; and employ risk assessment tools to identify patients without means to cope well at home after surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that OA guidelines do not support clinicians in caring for diverse persons with OA who face disadvantages due to intersectional factors that influence access to and quality of care. Developers could strengthen OA guidelines by incorporating guidance for PCC and for equity that could be drawn from existing frameworks and tools, and by including diverse persons with OA on guideline development panels. Future research is needed to identify multi-level (patient, clinician, system) strategies that could be implemented via guidelines or in other ways to improve equitable, person-centred OA care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study was informed by a team of researchers, collaborators, and thirteen diverse women with lived experience, who contributed to planning, and data collection, analysis and interpretation by reviewing study materials and providing verbal (during meetings) and written (via email) feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidinma Abuwa
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Angelina Abbaticchio
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Madeline Theodorlis
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | | | | | - Cornelia M Borkhoff
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Marisa Battistella
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dhanani S, Ramlakhan JU, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. Optimizing the design and implementation of question prompt lists to support person-centred care: A scoping review. Health Expect 2023; 26:1404-1417. [PMID: 37227115 PMCID: PMC10349246 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Question prompt lists (QPLs) are lists of questions that patients may want to discuss with clinicians. QPLs support person-centred care and have been associated with many beneficial outcomes including improved patient question-asking, and the amount and quality of the information provided by clinicians. The purpose of this study was to review published research on QPLs to explore how QPL design and implementation can be optimized. METHODS We performed a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Database from inception to 8 May 2022, for English language studies of any design that evaluated QPLs. We used summary statistics and text to report study characteristics, and QPL design and implementation. RESULTS We included 57 studies published from 1988 to 2022 by authors in 12 countries on a range of clinical topics. Of those, 56% provided the QPL, but few described how QPLs were developed. The number of questions varied widely (range 9-191). Most QPLs were single-page handouts (44%) but others ranged from 2 to 33 pages. Most studies implemented a QPL alone with no other accompanying strategy; most often in a print format before consultations by mail (18%) or in the waiting room (66%). Both patients and clinicians identified numerous benefits to patients of QPLs (e.g., increased patient confidence to ask questions, and patient satisfaction with communication or care received; and reduced anxiety about health status or treatment). To support use, patients desired access to QPLs in advance of clinician visits, and clinicians desired information/training on how to use the QPL and answer questions. Most (88%) studies reported at least one beneficial impact of QPLs. This was true even for single-page QPLs with few questions unaccompanied by other implementation strategies. Despite favourable views of QPLs, few studies assessed outcomes amongst clinicians. CONCLUSION This review identified QPL characteristics and implementation strategies that may be associated with beneficial outcomes. Future research should confirm these findings via systematic review and explore the benefits of QPLs from the clinician's perspective. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Following this review, we used the findings to develop a QPL on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and interviewed women and clinicians about QPL design including content, format, enablers and barriers of use, and potential outcomes including beneficial impacts and possible harms (will be published elsewhere).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shazia Dhanani
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Jessica U. Ramlakhan
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Whitney B. Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Anna R. Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abenoja A, Theodorlis M, Ahluwalia V, Battistella M, Borkhoff CM, Hazlewood GS, Lofters A, MacKay C, Marshall D, Gagliardi AR. Strategies to Improve Equitable Access to Early Osteoarthritis Diagnosis and Management: An updated Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023. [PMID: 37382031 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Though osteoarthritis (OA) affects millions of people worldwide, many fail to access recommended early, person-centered OA care, particularly women who are disproportionately impacted by OA. A prior review identified few strategies to improve equitable access to early diagnosis and management for multiple disadvantaged groups. We aimed to update that review with literature published in 2010 or later on strategies to improve OA care for disadvantaged groups including women. We identified only 11 eligible studies, of which only 2 (18%) focused on women only. Other disadvantaged groups targeted in the largely US-based studies included patients who are Black, Spanish-speaking, rural, and adults aged 60 years and older. All studies evaluated interventions targeted to patients; 4 (36%) assessed video decision aids, and 7 (63.6%) assessed in-person, video, or telephone self-management education. Interventions were often multifaceted (n = 9, 82%), and most studies (n = 8, 73%) achieved positive outcomes in at least some outcomes measured. No studies evaluated clinician- or system-level strategies. Few studies (n = 5, 45%) described how they tailored strategies to disadvantaged groups or how they addressed person-centered care concepts apart from enabling self-management. Future research is needed to develop, implement, evaluate, and scale-up multilevel strategies to enhance equitable, person-centered OA care for disadvantaged groups including women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Abenoja
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boury H, Albert M, Chen RHC, Chow JCL, DaCosta R, Hoffman MM, Keshavarz B, Kontos P, McAndrews MP, Protze S, Gagliardi AR. Exploring the merits of research performance measures that comply with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment and strategies to overcome barriers of adoption: qualitative interviews with administrators and researchers. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:43. [PMID: 37277824 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01001-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In prior research, we identified and prioritized ten measures to assess research performance that comply with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, a principle adopted worldwide that discourages metrics-based assessment. Given the shift away from assessment based on Journal Impact Factor, we explored potential barriers to implementing and adopting the prioritized measures. METHODS We identified administrators and researchers across six research institutes, conducted telephone interviews with consenting participants, and used qualitative description and inductive content analysis to derive themes. RESULTS We interviewed 18 participants: 6 administrators (research institute business managers and directors) and 12 researchers (7 on appointment committees) who varied by career stage (2 early, 5 mid, 5 late). Participants appreciated that the measures were similar to those currently in use, comprehensive, relevant across disciplines, and generated using a rigorous process. They also said the reporting template was easy to understand and use. In contrast, a few administrators thought the measures were not relevant across disciplines. A few participants said it would be time-consuming and difficult to prepare narratives when reporting the measures, and several thought that it would be difficult to objectively evaluate researchers from a different discipline without considerable effort to read their work. Strategies viewed as necessary to overcome barriers and support implementation of the measures included high-level endorsement of the measures, an official launch accompanied by a multi-pronged communication strategy, training for both researchers and evaluators, administrative support or automated reporting for researchers, guidance for evaluators, and sharing of approaches across research institutes. CONCLUSIONS While participants identified many strengths of the measures, they also identified a few limitations and offered corresponding strategies to address the barriers that we will apply at our organization. Ongoing work is needed to develop a framework to help evaluators translate the measures into an overall assessment. Given little prior research that identified research assessment measures and strategies to support adoption of those measures, this research may be of interest to other organizations that assess the quality and impact of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Himani Boury
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mathieu Albert
- The Institute for Education Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert H C Chen
- Research Solutions and Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - James C L Chow
- Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ralph DaCosta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael M Hoffman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Behrang Keshavarz
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pia Kontos
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Stephanie Protze
- McEwen Stem Cell Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simpson AN, Gomez D, Baxter NN, Miazga E, Urbach D, Ramlakhan J, Sorvari AM, Sherif A, Gagliardi AR. Patient, family and professional suggestions for pandemic-related surgical backlog recovery: a qualitative study. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E255-E266. [PMID: 36918209 PMCID: PMC10019322 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical shutdowns related to the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in prolonged wait times for nonemergency surgery. We aimed to understand informational needs and generate suggestions on management of the surgical backlog in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic through focus groups with key stakeholders. METHODS We performed a qualitative study with focus groups held between Sept. 29 and Nov. 30, 2021, in Ontario, with patients who underwent or were awaiting surgery during the pandemic and their family members, and health care leaders with experience or influence overseeing the delivery of surgical services. We conducted the focus groups virtually; focus groups for patients and family members were conducted separately from health care leaders to ensure participants could speak freely about their experiences. Our goal was to elicit information on the impact of communication about the surgical backlog, how this communication may be improved, and to generate and prioritize suggestions to address the backlog. Data were mapped onto 2 complementary frameworks that categorized approaches to reduction in wait times and strategies to improve health care delivery. RESULTS A total of 11 patients and family members and 20 health care leaders (7 nursing surgical directors, 10 surgeons and 3 administrators) participated in 7 focus groups (2 patient and family, and 5 health care leader). Participants reported receiving conflicting information about the surgical backlog. Suggestions for communication about the backlog included unified messaging from a single source with clear language to educate the public. Participants prioritized the following suggestions for surgical recovery: increase supply through focusing on system efficiencies and maintaining or increasing health care personnel; incorporate patient-centred outcomes into triage definitions; and refine strategies for performance management to understand and measure inequities between surgeons and centres, and consider the impact of funding incentives on "nonpriority" procedures. INTERPRETATION Patients and their families and health care leaders experienced a lack of communication about the surgical backlog and suggested this information should come from a single source; key suggestions to manage the surgical backlog included a focus on system efficiencies, incorporation of patient-centred outcomes into triage definitions, and improving the measurement of wait times to monitor health system performance. The suggestions generated in this study that may be used to address surgical backlog recovery in the Canadian setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea N Simpson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Gomez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Miazga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Urbach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jessica Ramlakhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne M Sorvari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alawia Sherif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Simpson, Miazga), and Division of General Surgery (Gomez, Sorvari, Sherif), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; ICES (Simpson, Gomez, Baxter, Urbach); Division of General Surgery (Urbach), Women's College Hospital; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Ramlakhan, Gagliardi), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (Baxter), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Plotkin A, Olkhov-Mitsel E, Gagliardi AR. The Impact of the Pathologist in Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences on Patient Care. Am J Clin Pathol 2023; 159:352-357. [PMID: 36749312 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqac164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) are important tools in the treatment of patients with complex health issues, helping clinicians achieve optimal outcomes in oncological practice. To explore the role of pathologists at MCCs, we conducted a review of prior research on this topic. METHODS We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for English-language qualitative, quantitative, or multiple/mixed methods studies on the role and impact of pathologists on MCCs. We used Microsoft Excel to extract data. RESULTS Of 76 research results, we included only 3 studies that involved review of cancer cases by pathologists for MCCs. All 3 studies showed that expert pathology review improved the accuracy of diagnosis and refined disease staging, leading to changes in the management of melanoma, breast cancer, and gynecologic cancer. No studies explored the barriers to pathologists participating in MCCs or the strategies or interventions employed to promote or support pathologist involvement. CONCLUSIONS We identified a paucity of studies on the role of pathologists in MCCs. Given the positive impact of MCCs involving pathologists on the accuracy of diagnosis and optimization of treatment, future research is warranted to further establish the role and impact of pathologists in MCCs and how to promote or support pathologists' involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Plotkin
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dong K, Gagliardi AR. Person-centered care for diverse women: Narrative review of foundational research. Womens Health (Lond) 2023; 19:17455057231192317. [PMID: 37596928 PMCID: PMC10440084 DOI: 10.1177/17455057231192317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
Despite advocacy and recommendations to improve health care and health for persons who identify as women, women continue to face inequities in access to and quality of care. Person-centered care for women is one approach that could reduce gendered inequities. We conducted a series of studies to understand what constitutes person-centered care for women and how to achieve it. The overall aim of this article is to highlight the key findings of those studies that can inform policy, practice, and ongoing research. We conducted a narrative review of all studies related to person-centered care for women conducted in our group starting in 2018 over a 5-year period, which was general at the outset, and increasingly focused on racialized immigrant women who constitute a large proportion of the Canadian population. We organized study summaries by research phase: synthesis of person-centered care for women research, exploration of existing person-centered care for women guidance, consultation with key informants, consensus survey of key informants to prioritize strategies to achieve person-centered care for women, and consensus meeting with key informants to prioritize future research. We conducted the reported research in collaboration with an advisory group of diverse women and managers of community agencies. Our research revealed that little prior research had fully established what constitutes person-centered care for women, and in particular, how to achieve it. We also found little acknowledgment of person-centered care for women or strategies to support it in medical curriculum, clinical guidelines, or healthcare policies. We subsequently consulted women who differed by age, ethno-cultural group, health issue, education and geography, and clinicians of different specialties, who offered considerable insight on strategies to support person-centered care for women. Other diverse women, clinicians, healthcare managers, and researchers prioritized issues that warrant future research. We hope that by compiling a summary of our completed research, we draw attention to the need for person-centered care for women and motivate others to pursue it through policy, practice, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Dong
- Division of General Surgery and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gagliardi AR, Chen RHC, Boury H, Albert M, Chow J, DaCosta RS, Hoffman M, Keshavarz B, Kontos P, Liu J, McAndrews MP, Protze S. DORA-compliant measures of research quality and impact to assess the performance of researchers in biomedical institutions: Review of published research, international best practice and Delphi survey. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0270616. [PMID: 37172046 PMCID: PMC10180594 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) advocates for assessing biomedical research quality and impact, yet academic organizations continue to employ traditional measures such as Journal Impact Factor. We aimed to identify and prioritize measures for assessing research quality and impact. METHODS We conducted a review of published and grey literature to identify measures of research quality and impact, which we included in an online survey. We assembled a panel of researchers and research leaders, and conducted a two-round Delphi survey to prioritize measures rated as high (rated 6 or 7 by ≥ 80% of respondents) or moderate (rated 6 or 7 by ≥ 50% of respondents) importance. RESULTS We identified 50 measures organized in 8 domains: relevance of the research program, challenges to research program, or productivity, team/open science, funding, innovations, publications, other dissemination, and impact. Rating of measures by 44 panelists (60%) in Round One and 24 (55%) in Round Two of a Delphi survey resulted in consensus on the high importance of 5 measures: research advances existing knowledge, research plan is innovative, an independent body of research (or fundamental role) supported by peer-reviewed research funding, research outputs relevant to discipline, and quality of the content of publications. Five measures achieved consensus on moderate importance: challenges to research productivity, potential to improve health or healthcare, team science, collaboration, and recognition by professional societies or academic bodies. There was high congruence between researchers and research leaders across disciplines. CONCLUSIONS Our work contributes to the field by identifying 10 DORA-compliant measures of research quality and impact, a more comprehensive and explicit set of measures than prior efforts. Research is needed to identify strategies to overcome barriers of use of DORA-compliant measures, and to "de-implement" traditional measures that do not uphold DORA principles yet are still in use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rob H C Chen
- UHN Research Solutions and Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Himani Boury
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mathieu Albert
- The Institute for Education Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Chow
- Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ralph S DaCosta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Hoffman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Behrang Keshavarz
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (KITE), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pia Kontos
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (KITE), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenny Liu
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Pat McAndrews
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Protze
- McEwen Stem Cell Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Anderson NN, Baker GR, Moody L, Scane K, Urquhart R, Wodchis WP, Gagliardi AR. Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061271. [PMID: 36127114 PMCID: PMC9490572 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient and family engagement (PE) in health service planning and improvement is widely advocated, yet little prior research offered guidance on how to optimise PE, particularly in hospitals. This study aimed to engage stakeholders in generating evidence-informed consensus on recommendations to optimise PE. DESIGN We transformed PE processes and resources from prior research into recommendations that populated an online Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Panellists included 58 persons with PE experience including: 22 patient/family advisors and 36 others (PE managers, clinicians, executives and researchers) in round 1 (100%) and 55 in round 2 (95%). OUTCOME MEASURES Ratings of importance on a seven-point Likert scale of 48 strategies organised in domains: engagement approaches, strategies to integrate diverse perspectives, facilitators, strategies to champion engagement and hospital capacity for engagement. RESULTS Of 50 recommendations, 80% or more of panellists prioritised 32 recommendations (27 in round 1, 5 in round 2) across 5 domains: 5 engagement approaches, 4 strategies to identify and integrate diverse patient/family advisor perspectives, 9 strategies to enable meaningful engagement, 9 strategies by which hospitals can champion PE and 5 elements of hospital capacity considered essential for supporting PE. There was high congruence in rating between patient/family advisors and healthcare professionals for all but six recommendations that were highly rated by patient/family advisors but not by others: capturing diverse perspectives, including a critical volume of advisors on committees/teams, prospectively monitoring PE, advocating for government funding of PE, including PE in healthcare worker job descriptions and sharing PE strategies across hospitals. CONCLUSIONS Decision-makers (eg, health system policy-makers, hospitals executives and managers) can use these recommendations as a framework by which to plan and operationalise PE, or evaluate and improve PE in their own settings. Ongoing research is needed to monitor the uptake and impact of these recommendations on PE policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lesley Moody
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerseri Scane
- Patient Partnerships, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boutcher F, Berta WB, Urquhart R, Gagliardi AR. A qualitative descriptive study of the role of nurse, allied health and physician middle managers who function as knowledge brokers in hospitals. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2022; 19:477-488. [PMID: 35726187 PMCID: PMC10084102 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge brokers (KB) are increasingly being employed in health care to implement evidence-based practice and improve quality of care. Middle managers (MMs) may play a KB role in the implementation of an innovative or evidence-based practice in hospitals. However, how MMs' broker knowledge in hospitals and their impact on practice has not been adequately studied. AIM To describe the role that MMs play in brokering knowledge in hospitals and their impact. METHOD A qualitative descriptive study was conducted to generate a detailed description of MM experiences as KBs in hospitals. Data were collected using semi-structured telephone interviews with MMs in Ontario, Canada. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure variation in MM characteristics and a diverse representation of perspectives. Data were collected and analyzed concurrently using an inductive constant comparative approach. RESULTS Twenty-one MMs from teaching and non-teaching hospitals participated. MMs described 10 roles and activities they enacted in hospitals that aligned with published KB roles. We found differences across professional groups and hospital type. Teaching status emerged as a potential factor relating to how MM KBs were able to function within hospitals. MMs reported enhanced patient, provider, and organizational outcomes. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION Middle managers may play an important KB role in the implementation of evidence-based practice in hospitals. An improved understanding of the KB roles that MMs play may be important in boosting evidence base practice in health care to ultimately improve quality of care. Administrators need a better understanding of the current KB roles and activities MMs enact as this may lead to more organizational structures to support MM KBs in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Boutcher
- Centre for Education and Knowledge Exchange in Aging, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education at Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Whitney B Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Marulappa N, Anderson NN, Bethell J, Bourbonnais A, Kelly F, McMurray J, Rogers HL, Vedel I, Gagliardi AR. How to implement person-centred care and support for dementia in outpatient and home/community settings: Scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:541. [PMID: 35459214 PMCID: PMC9034625 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07875-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little prior research focused on person-centred care and support (PCCS) for dementia in home, community or outpatient care. We aimed to describe what constitutes PCCS, how to implement it, and considerations for women who comprise the majority of affected persons (with dementia, carers). Methods We conducted a scoping review by searching multiple databases from 2000 inclusive to June 7, 2020. We extracted data on study characteristics and PCCS approaches, evaluation, determinants or the impact of strategies to implement PCCS. We used summary statistics to report data and interpreted findings with an existing person-centred care framework. Results We included 22 studies with qualitative (55%) or quantitative/multiple methods design (45%) involving affected persons (50%), or healthcare workers (50%). Studies varied in how PCCS was conceptualized; 59% cited a PCC definition or framework. Affected persons and healthcare workers largely agreed on what constitutes PCCS (e.g. foster partnership, promote autonomy, support carers). In 4 studies that evaluated care, barriers of PCCS were reported at the affected person (e.g. family conflict), healthcare worker (e.g. lack of knowledge) and organizational (e.g. resource constraints) levels. Studies that evaluated strategies to implement PCCS approaches were largely targeted to healthcare workers, and showed that in-person inter-professional educational meetings yielded both perceived (e.g. improved engagement of affected persons) and observed (e.g. use of PCCS approaches) beneficial outcomes. Few studies reported results by gender or other intersectional factors, and none revealed if or how to tailor PCCS for women. This synthesis confirmed and elaborated the PCC framework, resulting in a Framework of PCCS for Dementia. Conclusion Despite the paucity of research on PCCS for dementia, synthesis of knowledge from diverse studies into a Framework provides interim guidance for those planning or evaluating dementia services in outpatient, home or community settings. Further research is needed to elaborate the Framework, evaluate PCCS for dementia, explore determinants, and develop strategies to implement and scale-up PCCS approaches. Such studies should explore how to tailor PCCS needs and preferences based on input from persons with dementia, and by sex/gender and other intersectional factors such as ethnicity or culture. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07875-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Marulappa
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Jennifer Bethell
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Anne Bourbonnais
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, PO Box 6128, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Fiona Kelly
- Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret University Drive, Musselburgh, East Lothian, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Josephine McMurray
- Lazaridis School of Business and Economics/Health Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, 73 George Street, Brantford, ON, N3T 3Y3, Canada
| | - Heather L Rogers
- Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute and Ikerbasque Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain, Plaza Cruces s/n, E-48903, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Isabelle Vedel
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-Neiges, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Anderson NN, Dong K, Baker GR, Moody L, Scane K, Urquhart R, Wodchis WP, Gagliardi AR. Impacts of patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: qualitative interviews with patient/family advisors and hospital staff. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:360. [PMID: 35303884 PMCID: PMC8932199 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07747-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient engagement (PE) in hospital planning and improvement is widespread, yet we lack evidence of its impact. We aimed to identify benefits and harms that could be used to assess the impact of hospital PE. Methods We interviewed hospital-affiliated persons involved in PE activities using a qualitative descriptive approach and inductive content analysis to derive themes. We interpreted themes by mapping to an existing framework of healthcare performance measures and reported themes with exemplar quotes. Results Participants included 38 patient/family advisors, PE managers and clinicians from 9 hospitals (2 < 100 beds, 4 100 + beds, 3 teaching). Benefits of PE activities included 9 impacts on the capacity of hospitals. PE activities involved patient/family advisors and clinicians/staff in developing and spreading new PE processes across hospital units or departments, and those involved became more adept and engaged. PE had beneficial effects on hospital structures/resources, clinician staff functions and processes, patient experience and patient outcomes. A total of 14 beneficial impacts of PE were identified across these domains. Few unintended or harmful impacts were identified: overextended patient/family advisors, patient/family advisor turnover and clinician frustration if PE slowed the pace of planning and improvement. Conclusions The 23 self reported impacts were captured in a Framework of Impacts of Patient/Family Engagement on Hospital Planning and Improvement, which can be used by decision-makers to assess and allocate resources to hospital PE, and as the basis for ongoing research on the impacts of hospital PE and how to measure it. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07747-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, M5G2C4, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelly Dong
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lesley Moody
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kerseri Scane
- Patient Partnerships, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, M5G2C4, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gagliardi AR, Morrison C, Anderson NN. The design and impact of culturally-safe community-based physical activity promotion for immigrant women: descriptive review. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:430. [PMID: 35241058 PMCID: PMC8895569 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12828-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immigrant women have low rates of physical activity (PA), placing them at risk for chronic diseases. Some research suggests that strategies targeting this group must be culturally-safe and community-based. This study aimed to identify the design (i.e. characteristics) and impact of culturally-safe community-based PA promotion for immigrant women. METHODS We conducted a descriptive review by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to June 9, 2021 for English language studies that assessed community-based PA promotion strategies targeting adult immigrants and involved at least 50% women. We compiled findings in a preliminary context-mechanisms-outcomes conceptual framework. RESULTS We included 13 studies published from 2004 to 2020. Three included women-only; the remainder included a median of 63% women (range 50 to 98%). Studies included immigrants from Brazil, Dominican, Columbian, Haiti, Mexico, China, Vietnam, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan and Turkey. All but one study (89%) significantly improved one or more outcomes: PA knowledge, PA participation and anthropometric measures (e.g. weight, BMI, blood pressure). Most (89%) strategies were multi-faceted: in-person group educational sessions reinforced by take-home educational material and/or follow-up reminder phone calls. Single strategies (e.g. mailed educational material, group educational session) also achieved beneficial outcomes. We identified 17 culturally-safe characteristics of PA promotion strategies: language of choice, based in community settings or organizations, led by lay health workers, reflected ethno-cultural linguistic expressions and PA norms, and recognized and offered solutions to barriers of PA. Findings were captured in a preliminary theory of how contextual factors (gender, intersectionality) and mechanism (culturally-safe PA promotion) may influence PA-related outcomes (PA knowledge, self-efficacy and participation; anthropometric measures, quality of life). CONCLUSIONS This study revealed the characteristics of PA promotion strategies that significantly improved PA-related outcomes among immigrants. Given that few studies focused solely on immigrant women or reported sub-analyses, the conceptual framework generated by this study can be used in future research to more definitively establish the design and impact of culturally-safe, community-based PA promotion for immigrant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 13EN-228 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada.
| | - Ciara Morrison
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 13EN-228 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 13EN-228 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dong K, Jameel B, Gagliardi AR. How is patient-centred care conceptualized in obstetrical health? comparison of themes from concept analyses in obstetrical health- and patient-centred care. Health Expect 2022; 25:823-839. [PMID: 35026046 PMCID: PMC9122412 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to gender inequities that exist for women of childbearing age, there exists a need to deliver care tailored to their needs and preferences. Patient‐centred care (PCC) can be used to meet these needs. This review aims to compare patient care delivery between PCC and obstetrical care. This can help us address how PCC should be delivered to women before, during and after pregnancy versus how it is delivered to patients regardless of sex. Methods A review of literature was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SCOPUS for English PCC and high‐quality perinatal reviews published between 2010 and 2021. The data were analysed using a modified Walker and Avant framework. Results A total of 2138 unique studies were identified, with 11 PCC and 9 high‐quality obstetrical care studies included. Common defining features between PCC and obstetrical care include respect and dignity, informed decision‐making, therapeutic alliance, effective communication, social relationships and autonomy. PCC‐specific features were holistic care, empowerment, individualized care, coordinated care and empathy. Unique high‐quality obstetrical care themes included continuity of care, privacy and confidentiality, provider education and status, physical environment and equitable maternal care. Conclusions There are shared defining attributes between PCC and obstetrical care, including respect and dignity, informed decision‐making, the therapeutic alliance, effective communication, social relationships and autonomy. However, there remain unique defining attributes for high‐quality obstetrical care and PCC. This highlights the need for a unique approach to obstetrical care. More research on care for different physiological conditions in women is needed to address patient care that addresses different parts of the lifespan and develop frameworks that can influence health policy, patient care and health system evaluation. Patient or Public Contribution This study was one part of a larger, multicomponent study of how to implement PCC for women across the lifespan. While we did not specifically consult or involve women in this dual concept analysis, our larger study (content analysis of clinical guidelines and government policies, qualitative interviews with women and clinicians, Delphi study to prioritize consensus recommendations for achieving PCC for women) was guided by the experiences and input of a 50+ women advisory panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Dong
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bismah Jameel
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Boutcher F, Berta W, Urquhart R, Gagliardi AR. The roles, activities and impacts of middle managers who function as knowledge brokers to improve care delivery and outcomes in healthcare organizations: a critical interpretive synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:11. [PMID: 34974827 PMCID: PMC8722036 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07387-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Middle Managers (MMs) are thought to play a pivotal role as knowledge brokers (KBs) in healthcare organizations. However, the role of MMs who function as KBs (MM KBs) in health care is under-studied. Research is needed that contributes to our understanding of how MMs broker knowledge in health care and what factors influence their KB efforts. Methods We used a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) approach to review both qualitative and quantitative studies to develop an organizing framework of how MMs enact the KB role in health care. We used compass questions to create a search strategy and electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Social Sciences Abstracts, ABI/INFORM, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC and the Cochrane Library. Searching, sampling, and data analysis was an iterative process, using constant comparison, to synthesize the results. Results We included 41 articles (38 empirical studies and 3 conceptual papers) that met the eligibility criteria. No existing review was found on this topic. A synthesis of the studies revealed 12 MM KB roles and 63 associated activities beyond existing roles hypothesized by extant theory, and we elaborate on two MM KB roles: 1) convincing others of the need for, and benefit of an innovation or evidence-based practice; and 2) functioning as a strategic influencer. We identified organizational and individual factors that may influence the efforts of MM KBs in healthcare organizations. Additionally, we found that the MM KB role was associated with enhanced provider knowledge, and skills, as well as improved organizational outcomes. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MMs do enact KB roles in healthcare settings to implement innovations and practice change. Our organizing framework offers a novel conceptualization of MM KBs that advances understanding of the emerging KB role that MMs play in healthcare organizations. In addition to roles, this study contributes to the extant literature by revealing factors that may influence the efforts and impacts of MM KBs in healthcare organizations. Future studies are required to refine and strengthen this framework. Trial registration A protocol for this review was not registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07387-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Boutcher
- Baycrest Health Sciences, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada.
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building Suite 425, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- University Health Network, 13EN-228, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Anderson NN, Baker GR, Moody L, Scane K, Urquhart R, Wodchis WP, Gagliardi AR. Organizational capacity for patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: interviews with patient/family advisors, managers and clinicians. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6413798. [PMID: 34718601 PMCID: PMC8678957 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient and family engagement (PE) in healthcare planning and improvement achieves beneficial outcomes and is widely advocated, but a lack of resources is a critical barrier. Little prior research studied how organizations support engagement specifically in hospitals. OBJECTIVE We explored what constitutes hospital capacity for engagement. METHODS We conducted descriptive qualitative interviews and complied with criteria for rigour and reporting in qualitative research. We interviewed patient/family advisors, engagement managers, clinicians and executives at hospitals with high engagement activity, asking them to describe essential resources or processes. We used content analysis and constant comparison to identify themes and corresponding quotes and interpreted findings by mapping themes to two existing frameworks of PE capacity not specific to hospitals. RESULTS We interviewed 40 patient/family advisors, patient engagement managers, clinicians and corporate executives from nine hospitals (two < 100 beds, four 100 + beds, three teaching). Four over-arching themes about capacity considered essential included resources, training, organizational commitment and staff support. Views were similar across participant and hospital groups. Resources included funding and people dedicated to PE and technology to enable communication and collaboration. Training encompassed initial orientation and project-specific training for patient/family advisors and orientation for new staff and training for existing staff on how to engage with patient/family advisors. Organizational commitment included endorsement from the CEO and Board, commitment from staff and continuous evaluation and improvement. Staff support included words and actions that conveyed value for the role and input of patient/family advisors. The blended, non-hospital-specific framework captured all themes. Hospitals of all types varied in the availability of funding dedicated to PE. In particular, reimbursement of expenses and compensation for time and contributions were not provided to patient/family advisors. In addition to skilled engagement managers, the role of clinician or staff champions was viewed as essential. CONCLUSION The findings build on prior research that largely focused on PE in individual clinical care or research or in primary care planning and improvement. The findings closely aligned with existing frameworks of organizational capacity for PE not specific to hospital settings, which suggests that hospitals could use the blended framework to plan, evaluate and improve their PE programs. Further research is needed to yield greater insight into how to promote and enable compensation for patient/family advisors and the role of clinician or staff champions in supporting PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research
Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth
Street, Toronto M5G2C4, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy,
Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155
College Street, Toronto M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Lesley Moody
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre,
University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto,
ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Kerseri Scane
- Patient Partnerships, University
Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G2C4,
Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and
Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, 5790 University
Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 1V7, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy,
Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155
College Street, Toronto M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Address reprint requests to: Anna R. Gagliardi, Toronto
General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth
Street, Toronto, ON M5G3C4, Canada. Tel: +416-340-4800; Fax:
+416-340-4816; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Anderson NN, Gagliardi AR. Development, characteristics and impact of quality improvement casebooks: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:123. [PMID: 34496875 PMCID: PMC8425030 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00777-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Quality improvement (QI) casebooks, compilations of QI experiences, are one way to share experiential knowledge that healthcare policy-makers, managers and professionals can adapt to their own contexts. However, QI casebook use, characteristics and impact are unknown. We aimed to synthesize published research on QI prevalence, development, characteristics and impact. Methods We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SCOPUS from inception to 4 February 2021. We extracted data on study characteristics and casebook definitions, development, characteristics (based on the WIDER [Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research] framework) and impact. We reported findings using summary statistics, text and tables. Results We screened 2999 unique items and included five articles published in Canada from 2011 to 2020 describing three studies. Casebooks focused on promoting positive weight-related conversations with children and parents, coordinating primary care-specialist cancer management, and showcasing QI strategies for cancer management. All defined casebooks similarly described real-world experiences of developing and implementing QI strategies that others could learn from, emulate or adapt. In all studies, casebook development was a multistep, iterative, interdisciplinary process that engages stakeholders in identifying, creating and reviewing content. While casebooks differed in QI topic, level of application and scope, cases featured common elements: setting or context, QI strategy details, impacts achieved, and additional tips for implementing strategies. Cases were described with a blend of text, graphics and tools. One study evaluated casebook impact, and found that it enhanced self-efficacy and use of techniques to improve clinical care. Although details about casebook development and characteristics were sparse, we created a template of casebook characteristics, which others can use as the basis for developing or evaluating casebooks. Conclusion Future research is needed to optimize methods for developing casebooks and to evaluate their impact. One approach is to assess how the many QI casebooks available online were developed. Casebooks should be evaluated alone or in combination with other interventions that support QI on a range of outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00777-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Armstrong MJ, Rastgardani T, Gagliardi AR, Marras C. Impact of Off Periods on Persons With Parkinson Disease and Care Partners: A Qualitative Study. Neurol Clin Pract 2021; 11:e232-e238. [PMID: 34484896 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background The definition of off periods proposed in 2018 emphasizes functional disability as part of the off period experience, but limited research to date investigates the functional impact of off periods on persons with Parkinson disease and care partners. This study aimed to investigate the impact of off periods on both persons with Parkinson disease and care partners through interviews of dyads living with motor and/or nonmotor fluctuations. Methods Investigators performed interviews separately with persons with Parkinson disease and care partners using a semistructured questionnaire. Investigators used a qualitative descriptive approach to identify themes in interview transcripts relating to the impact of off periods on daily life. Identified themes were subsequently organized using World Health Organization quality of life domains. Results Twenty persons with Parkinson disease and their care partners (total n = 40) participated in interviews. Persons with Parkinson disease described impairments in level of independence (e.g., relating to employment, mobility, activities of daily living, and medication timing), socialization, leisure activities, driving, physical function, and psychological experiences relating to off periods. Care partners reported off period impacts on their own independence, socialization, leisure, and psychological experiences. Conclusions Clinicians should query the daily impact of off periods on both persons with Parkinson disease and care partners at clinical visits to inform treatment decisions and counseling. Measures of off period impact should be incorporated into clinical trials targeting fluctuations to fully understand the effects of interventions for fluctuations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Neurology (MJA), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville; Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Research (TR, CM), Toronto Western Hospital; and Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (ARG), University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Rastgardani
- Department of Neurology (MJA), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville; Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Research (TR, CM), Toronto Western Hospital; and Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (ARG), University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Department of Neurology (MJA), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville; Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Research (TR, CM), Toronto Western Hospital; and Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (ARG), University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
| | - Connie Marras
- Department of Neurology (MJA), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville; Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Research (TR, CM), Toronto Western Hospital; and Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (ARG), University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Anderson NN, Gagliardi AR. Unclear if future physicians are learning about patient-centred care: Content analysis of curriculum at 16 medical schools. Med Teach 2021; 43:1085-1091. [PMID: 33915064 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2021.1918332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Given barriers of patient-centred care (PCC) among physicians and trainees, this study assessed how medical schools addressed PCC in curriculum. METHOD The authors used content analysis to describe PCC in publicly-available curriculum documents of Canadian medical schools guided by McCormack's PCC Framework, and reported results using summary statistics and text examples. RESULTS The authors retrieved 1459 documents from 16 medical schools (median 49.5, range 16-301). Few mentioned PCC (301, 21.2%), and even fewer thoroughly or accurately described PCC. Significantly more clerkship versus pre-clerkship (24.0% vs 12.6%, p < 0.00001), and elective compared with core course descriptions (24.7% vs 14.9%, p < 0.00001) mentioned PCC. The domain of foster a healing relationship was common (79.0%) compared with other domains: address concerns (16.5%), exchange information (14.9%), enable self-care (10.4%), share decisions (4.5%), and manage uncertainty (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS Overall, few documents mentioned or described PCC or related concepts. This varied by school, and was more frequent in clerkship and elective courses, suggesting that student exposure may be brief and variable. Thus, it remains unclear if medical students are fully exposed to what PCC means and how to implement it. Future research is needed to confirm if PCC content in medical curriculum is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Anderson NN, Gagliardi AR. Medical student exposure to women's health concepts and practices: a content analysis of curriculum at Canadian medical schools. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21:435. [PMID: 34407817 PMCID: PMC8371837 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02873-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women's health (WH) includes a broad array of concerns and challenges that affect health across the lifespan. Considerable research shows that women continue to experience disparities in access to and quality of care. Apart from surveys of medical trainees and faculty, little research and none in Canada examined medical curriculum for WH. This study assessed how Canadian medical schools integrate WH in their curriculum. METHODS We used deductive and summative content analysis to describe instances and the nature of WH topics in program and course descriptions that were publicly-available on web sites of Canadian medical schools. We reported results using summary statistics and text examples. We employed a framework, tested in our prior research, that included mention of women's health principles and practices relevant to any health concern or condition including factors (e.g. sex, gender, social determinants) that influence health, and access to or quality of care. RESULTS We retrieved 1459 documents from 16 medical schools (median 49.5, range 16 to 301). Few mentioned WH (125, 8.6 %), and the quantity of mentions varied by school (range 0.0-37.5 %). Pre-clerkship course documents more frequently mentioned WH (61/374, 17.3 %, chi square 43.2, p < 0.00001) compared with clerkship course documents (58/1067, 5.4 %). Core course documents more frequently mentioned WH (72/542, 13.3 %, chi square 29.0, p < 0.00001) compared with elective course documents WH (47/899, 5.2 %). Overall, documents more frequently referred to the WH domain of social determinants of health (88, 70.4 %). Few documents addressed women's health (21, 16.8 %), sex or gender (19, 15.2 %), other considerations (15.2 %) or principles/components of women's health (2, 1.6 %). Most documents that mentioned WH provided little detail about what those concepts referred to or how to optimize WH. CONCLUSIONS Based on program and course descriptions, WH may not be well-integrated at Canadian medical schools, and future physicians may not be consistently exposed to the full breadth of WH. This reveals opportunities for enhancing WH in the medical curriculum. Future research is needed to engage stakeholders including women in developing, implementing and evaluating competencies and corresponding curriculum that reflect the full range of WH concepts and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street. 13EN-228, M5G2C4, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street. 13EN-228, M5G2C4, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the review is to assess trends in guideline implementation, including the interventions used, rationale provided, and the impact on patient or health care professional knowledge, behavior or outcomes. INTRODUCTION Guidelines must be actively implemented to promote use and achieve beneficial outcomes. A review published in 2015 found that studies of guideline implementation did not employ a range of implementation planning approaches to select and tailor interventions, resulting in inconsistent impact. This study will update the 2015 review and elaborate beyond the four diseases originally covered to assess if more recent efforts to implement guidelines were informed by best implementation practices. INCLUSION CRITERIA We will include published studies that describe the implementation of guidelines on any clinical topic relevant to primary, secondary, or tertiary care using interventions targeted to patients, families/caregivers, or health care professionals. METHODS We will search MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from 2014 (search date in 2015 review) to the present. Two or more persons will screen titles and full-text articles, and extract data from included studies. We will use summary statistics, tables, and a narrative summary to describe study characteristics, guideline implementation interventions, the rationale for intervention selection and tailoring (pre-identified barriers, patient or stakeholder preferences, theory), and intervention impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada Write InSciTe, South Salem, NY, United States JBI, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Washington, DC, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Youn S, Wong SA, Chrystoja C, Tomlinson G, Wijeysundera HC, Bell CM, Gagliardi AR, Baxter NN, Takata J, Sandhu L, Urbach DR. Bias estimation in study design: a meta-epidemiological analysis of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement. BMC Surg 2021; 21:285. [PMID: 34098926 PMCID: PMC8186071 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01278-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paucity of RCTs of non-drug technologies lead to widespread dependence on non-randomized studies. Relationship between nonrandomized study design attributes and biased estimates of treatment effects are poorly understood. Our purpose was to estimate the bias associated with specific nonrandomized study attributes among studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. RESULTS We included 6 RCTs and 87 nonrandomized studies. Surgical risk scores were similar for comparison groups in RCTs, but were higher for patients having transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonrandomized studies. Nonrandomized studies underestimated the benefit of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with RCTs. For example, nonrandomized studies without adjustment estimated a higher risk of postoperative mortality for transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.26 to 1.62]) than high quality RCTs (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.54 to 1.11). Nonrandomized studies using propensity score matching (OR 1.13 [95% CI 0.85 to 1.52]) and regression modelling (OR 0.68 [95% CI 0.57 to 0.81]) to adjust results estimated treatment effects closer to high quality RCTs. Nonrandomized studies describing losses to follow-up estimated treatment effects that were significantly closer to high quality RCT than nonrandomized studies that did not. CONCLUSION Studies with different attributes produce different estimates of treatment effects. Study design attributes related to the completeness of follow-up may explain biased treatment estimates in nonrandomized studies, as in the case of aortic valve replacement where high-risk patients were preferentially selected for the newer (transcatheter) procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saerom Youn
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Shannon Avery Wong
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Parkville, QLD, Australia
| | - Caitlin Chrystoja
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Harindra C Wijeysundera
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Chaim M Bell
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Takata
- Women's College Hospital Research Institute (WCRI), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lakhbir Sandhu
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Robert Urbach
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Women's College Hospital Research Institute (WCRI), Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Room 8332, M5S 1B2, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (WIHV), Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gagliardi AR, Yip CYY, Irish J, Wright FC, Rubin B, Ross H, Green R, Abbey S, McAndrews MP, Stewart DE. The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Health Expect 2021; 24:978-990. [PMID: 33769657 PMCID: PMC8235883 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Waiting for procedures delayed by COVID-19 may cause anxiety and related adverse consequences. OBJECTIVE To synthesize research on the mental health impact of waiting and patient-centred mitigation strategies that could be applied in the COVID-19 context. METHODS Using a scoping review approach, we searched 9 databases for studies on waiting lists and mental health and reported study characteristics, impacts and intervention attributes and outcomes. RESULTS We included 51 studies that focussed on organ transplant (60.8%), surgery (21.6%) or cancer management (13.7%). Most patients and caregivers reported anxiety, depression and poor quality of life, which deteriorated with increasing wait time. The impact of waiting on mental health was greater among women and new immigrants, and those of younger age, lower socio-economic status, or with less-positive coping ability. Six studies evaluated educational strategies to develop coping skills: 2 reduced depression (2 did not), 1 reduced anxiety (2 did not) and 2 improved quality of life (2 did not). In contrast, patients desired acknowledgement of concerns, peer support, and periodic communication about wait-list position, prioritization criteria and anticipated procedure date. CONCLUSIONS Findings revealed patient-centred strategies to alleviate the mental health impact of waiting for procedures. Ongoing research should explore how to optimize the impact of those strategies for diverse patients and caregivers, particularly in the COVID-19 context. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Six patients and four caregivers waiting for COVID-19-delayed procedures helped to establish eligibility criteria, plan data extraction and review a draft and final report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R. Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | | | - Jonathan Irish
- Surgical Oncology Program/Access to Care‐SurgeryOntario Health‐Cancer Care OntarioTorontoCanada
| | | | - Barry Rubin
- Peter Munk Cardiac CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Heather Ross
- Ted Rogers Centre of Excellence in Heart FunctionUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Robin Green
- Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Susan Abbey
- Medical Psychiatry & Psychosocial OncologyUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | | | - Donna E. Stewart
- University Health Network Centre for Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rastgardani T, Armstrong MJ, Gagliardi AR, Grabovsky A, Marras C. Experience and Impact of OFF Periods in Parkinson's Disease: A Survey of Physicians, Patients, and Carepartners. J Parkinsons Dis 2021; 10:315-324. [PMID: 31815702 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-191785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND OFF periods impair quality of life in Parkinson's disease but the nature and degree of this impact is largely unquantified. Optimal treatment relies on assessing the experience and impact of these periods on patients and their carepartners. OBJECTIVES To understand the experience and impact of OFF periods on their lives. METHODS Informed by qualitative interviews we designed questionnaires and surveyed neurologists, people with Parkinson's disease and carepartners. RESULTS 50 general neurologists, 50 movement disorder neurologists, 442 patients (median disease duration 5 years) and 97 carepartners were included. The most common OFF symptoms reported by patients and carepartners were stiffness, slowness of movement and changes in gait. Non-motor symptoms were less common. A higher proportion of carepartners reported each symptom. A minority of neurologists recognized pain, sweating and anxiety as possible symptoms of OFF periods. The three OFF symptoms most frequently designated as having great impact by people with Parkinson's disease were changes in gait, slowness and stiffness. In contrast, cognitive impairment was most frequently rated as having great impact on carepartners. OFF periods were reported to impact many aspects of the lives of both patients and carepartners. CONCLUSIONS In people with Parkinson's disease of under 10 years duration, motor symptoms of OFF periods predominate in impact, however cognitive impairment has great impact on carepartners. Education is needed for neurologists regarding the non-motor aspects of OFF. The importance of involving carepartners in the assessment regarding OFF periods is supported by the higher frequency of symptom reporting by carepartners, and the significant impact on their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Rastgardani
- The Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Research, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Connie Marras
- The Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Research, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kim C, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. Exploring approaches to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in clinical guidelines: Qualitative interviews with guideline developers. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:703-708. [PMID: 33059950 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines informed by patient preferences are more likely to be used and widely advocated, yet research shows that few guidelines reflect patient preferences. OBJECTIVE Explore how developers generate guidelines informed by patient preferences. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT Seventeen patients were involved as interview participants. METHODS Using a basic descriptive approach, we conducted and analyzed semi-structured telephone interviews with 50 participants who were involved in developing guidelines on various topics. The sample included 17 patients, 16 clinicians and 17 managers from a total of 7 countries. RESULTS Participants used one or more approaches to identify preferences, patient panelists, focus groups, surveys and review of published research, despite acknowledging they identified similar preferences. Participants said they incorporated preferences in all guideline development steps, but provided little detail of specific processes. Few participants said their guidelines explicitly reported how patients were engaged, preferences identified, or how preferences influenced development processes or the guideline. Enablers were patient and clinician training, supportive coordinators and chairs, involving experienced patients, and assistance from qualitative and review experts. Barriers were finding and preparing patients, clinician skepticism about benefits, and token patient involvement. Participants recommended research on how to generate preference-informed guidelines. DISCUSSION Ideal approaches to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in guidelines are unclear and unproven. PRACTICAL VALUE Findings revealed specific ways that developers can enhance their processes (e.g. patient training, supportive coordinators and chairs, involve experts in qualitative researcher and systematic reviews) and key issues that warrant ongoing research (e.g. how best to incorporate and report preferences).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Kim
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Whitney B Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Anderson NN, Baker GR, Moody L, Scane K, Urquhart R, Wodchis WP, Gagliardi AR. Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews. Health Expect 2021; 24:967-977. [PMID: 33761175 PMCID: PMC8235895 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient engagement (PE) in health‐care planning and improvement is a growing practice. We lack evidence‐based guidance for PE, particularly in hospital settings. This study explored how to optimize PE in hospitals. Methods This study was based on qualitative interviews with individuals in various roles at hospitals with high PE capacity. We asked how patients were engaged, rationale for approaches chosen and solutions for key challenges. We identified themes using content analysis. Results Participants included 40 patient/family advisors, PE managers, clinicians and executives from 9 hospitals (2 < 100 beds, 4 100 + beds, 3 teaching). Hospitals most frequently employed collaboration (standing committees, project teams), followed by blended approaches (collaboration + consultation), and then consultation (surveys, interviews). Those using collaboration emphasized integrating perspectives into decisions; those using consultation emphasized capturing diverse perspectives. Strategies to support engagement included engaging diverse patients, prioritizing what benefits many, matching patients to projects, training patients and health‐care workers, involving a critical volume of patients, requiring at least one patient for quorum, asking involved patients to review outputs, linking PE with the Board of Directors and championing PE by managers, staff and committee/team chairs. Conclusion This research generated insight on concrete approaches and strategies that hospitals can use to optimize PE for planning and improvement. On‐going research is needed to understand how to recruit diverse patients and best balance blended consultation/collaboration approaches. Patient or public contribution Three patient research partners with hospital PE experience informed study objectives and interview questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lesley Moody
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kerseri Scane
- Patient Partnerships, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gagliardi AR, Martinez JPD, Baker GR, Moody L, Scane K, Urquhart R, Wodchis WP. Hospital capacity for patient engagement in planning and improving health services: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:179. [PMID: 33632200 PMCID: PMC7908767 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06174-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient engagement (PE) in planning or improving hospital facilities or services is one approach for improving healthcare delivery and outcomes. To provide evidence on hospital capacity needed to support PE, we described the attributes of hospital PE capacity associated with clinical quality measures. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of general and specialty hospitals based on the Measuring Organizational Readiness for Patient Engagement framework. We derived a PE capacity index measure, and with Multiple Correspondence Analysis, assessed the association of PE capacity with hospital type, and rates of hand-washing, C. difficile infection rates and 30-day readmission. Results Respondents (91, 66.4%) included general: < 100 beds (48.4%), 100+ beds (27.5%), teaching hospitals (11.0%) and specialty (13.2%) hospitals. Most featured PE in multiple clinical and corporate departments. Most employed PE in a range of Planning (design/improve facilities 94.5%, develop strategic plans 87.9%), Evaluation/Quality Improvement (accreditation 91.2%, develop QI plans 90.1%) and Service Delivery activities (develop information/communication aids 92.3%). Hospitals enabled PE with multiple supports (median 12, range 0 to 25), most often: 76.9% strategic plan recognizes PE, 74.7% patient/family advisory council, and 69.2% pool of patient volunteers; and least often: 30.0% PE staff, 26.4% PE funding and 16.5% patient reimbursement or 3.3% compensation. Hospitals employed a range of less (inform, consult) and more (involve, partner) active modes of engagement. Two variables accounted for 29.6% of variance in hospital PE capacity index measure data: number of departments featuring PE and greater use of active engagement modes. PE capacity was not associated with general hospital type or clinical quality measures. Conclusions Hospitals with fewer resources can establish favourable PE conditions by deploying PE widely and actively engaging patients. Healthcare policy-makers, hospital executives and PE managers can use these findings to allocate PE resources. Future research should explore how PE modes and methods impact clinical outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06174-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada.
| | | | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lesley Moody
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kerseri Scane
- Patient Partnerships, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lazor T, De Souza C, Urquhart R, Serhal E, Gagliardi AR. Few guidelines offer recommendations on how to assess and manage anxiety and distress in children with cancer: a content analysis. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:2279-2288. [PMID: 33150522 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05845-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (1) describe and compare, across all eligible guidelines, recommendations that address any aspect of clinical assessment or management of anxiety and distress experienced by children and adolescents undergoing cancer treatment or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and (2) assess guideline characteristics that influence identified recommendations. METHODS We searched five databases for relevant guidelines and conducted a grey literature search. Guidelines had to refer to children 0-18 years old who were undergoing cancer treatment or HSCT, describe any aspect of clinical assessment or management of symptoms of anxiety and distress, and be publicly accessible and published in English on or after 2000. RESULTS We identified 118 guidelines on pediatric cancer of which 13 mentioned clinical assessment or management of anxiety and distress. Six contained ≥ 1 recommendation addressing assessments of symptoms of which only two recommended specific screening instruments. Ten contained ≥ 1 recommendation addressing interventions for symptoms, of which six described specific interventions such as distraction and medication. Psychologists and nurses were the most common panel members and three guideline panels included a patient advocate. Only two guidelines received overall quality ratings > 80.0%. CONCLUSION We identified no guidelines that were specific to clinical assessment or management of anxiety and distress among children and adolescents undergoing cancer treatment or HSCT, and thus, clinicians lack evidence-informed guidance on how to manage these specific symptoms. Future research should establish high-quality guidelines that offer recommendations specific to clinical assessment and management of anxiety and distress in pediatric oncology and HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Lazor
- Department of Social Work, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| | - Claire De Souza
- Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Eva Serhal
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2C9, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Retrouvey H, Webster F, Zhong T, Gagliardi AR, Baxter NN. Cross-sectional analysis of bibliometrics and altmetrics: comparing the impact of qualitative and quantitative articles in the British Medical Journal. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040950. [PMID: 33087378 PMCID: PMC7580064 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In comparison to quantitative research, the impact of qualitative articles in the medical literature has been questioned by the BMJ; to explore this, we compared the impact of quantitative and qualitative articles published in BMJ. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING Articles published in the BMJ between 2007 and 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Bibliometric and altmetric measures of research impact were collected using Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Plum Analytics and ProQuest Altmetric. Bibliometric measures consisted of citation numbers, field weighted citation impact and citation percentile. Altmetric measures consisted of article usage, captures, mentions, readers, altmetric attention score and score percentile. Scores were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank-sum test. RESULTS We screened a total of 7777 articles and identified 42 qualitative articles. Each qualitative article was matched to 3 quantitative articles published during the same year (126 quantitative articles). Citation numbers were not statistically different between the two research types; the median number of citations (google scholar) per quantitative article was 62 (IQR 38-111) versus 58 (IQR 36-85) per qualitative article (p=0.47). Using Plum Analytics, qualitative articles were found to have a significantly higher usage, with a median of 984 (IQR 581-1351) versus 379 (IQR 177-763) for quantitative (p<0.001). The Altmetric Attention Score was higher for quantitative articles at 16 (IQR 7-37) versus qualitative articles at 9 (IQR 5-23, p=0.05), as was the Altmetric Score percentile 93 (IQR 87-96) versus 88 (IQR 76-95; p=0.02). CONCLUSION Qualitative and quantitative articles published in the BMJ between 2007 and 2017 both have a high impact. No article type was consistently superior in terms of bibliometric or altmetric measures, suggesting that type of article is not the major driver of impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Retrouvey
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Webster
- Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Toni Zhong
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gagliardi AR, Reich HN, Cattran DC, Barbour SJ. How to optimize the design and implementation of risk prediction tools: focus group with patients with IgA nephropathy. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:231. [PMID: 32938443 PMCID: PMC7493917 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01253-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a common type of chronic immune-mediated kidney disease with variable risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease. Risk stratification helps clinicians weight the potential risks and benefits of immunosuppressive therapy for individual patients, and can inform patient-centred communication. No prior research examined barriers of risk predication tools (RPT) specific to IgAN. The purpose of this study was to explore determinants (facilitators, barriers) of RPT use from the patient perspective. Methods We conducted a single focus group with English-speaking adults aged 18 or older with biopsy-proven IgAN. We asked about how they would use an IgAN RPT, and how to improve its design and implementation. We analyzed the transcript using constant comparison to inductively derive themes, and complied with qualitative research reporting criteria. Results The 5 participants were Caucasian men who varied in age from 35 to 55. The glomerular filtration rate ranged from 29 to 71 mL/min/1.73m2, and proteinuria ranged from 0.36 to 1.41 g/d. Participants identified both benefits and harms of the risk score. They said physicians should first ask patients for permission to use it. To make it more useful, participants offered suggestions to enhance RTP design: visual display, information on how to interpret the risk score, risk categories, health implications, modifiable risk factors, multiple scenarios, and comparison with similar patients. They offered additional suggestions to enhance RPT implementation: it should not replace patient-provider discussion, it should be accompanied by self-management education so that patients can take an active role in their health. Participants appreciated information from members of the multidisciplinary team in addition to physicians. Participants also said that physicians should monitor patient emotions or concerns on an ongoing basis. Conclusions Patients with IgAN identified numerous ways to enhance the design and use of an RPT. Others could use this information to design and implement RPTs for patients with other conditions, but should employ user-centred design to develop RPTs that address patient preferences.
Collapse
|
37
|
Filler T, Foster AM, Grace SL, Stewart DE, Straus SE, Gagliardi AR. Patient-Centered Care for Women: Delphi Consensus on Evidence-Derived Recommendations. Value Health 2020; 23:1012-1019. [PMID: 32828212 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient-centered care (PCC) could reduce gender inequities in quality of care. Little is known about how to implement patient-centered care for women (PCCW). We aimed to generate consensus recommendations for achieving PCCW. METHODS We used a 2-round Delphi technique. Panelists included 21 women of varied age, ethnicity, education, and urban/rural residence; and 21 health professionals with PCC or women's health expertise. Panelists rated recommendations, derived from prior research and organized by a 6-domain PCC framework, on a 7-point Likert scale in an online survey. We used summary statistics to report response frequencies and defined consensus as when ≥85% panelists chose 5 to 7. RESULTS The response rate was 100%. In round 1, women and professionals retained 46 (97.9%) and 42 (89.4%) of 47 initial recommendations, respectively. The round 2 survey included 6 recommendations for women and 5 recommendations for professionals (did not achieve consensus in round 1 or were newly suggested). In round 2, women retained 2 of 6 recommendations and professionals retained 3 of 5 recommendations. Overall, 49 recommendations were generated. Both groups agreed on 44 (94.0%) recommendations (13 retained by 100% of both women and clinicians): fostering patient-physician relationship (n = 11), exchanging information (n = 10), responding to emotions (n = 4), managing uncertainty (n = 5), making decisions (n = 8), and enabling patient self-management (n = 6). CONCLUSION The recommendations represent the range of PCC domains, are based on evidence from primary research, and reflect high concordance between women and professional panelists. They can inform the development of policies, guidelines, programs, and performance measures that foster PCCW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tali Filler
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Angel M Foster
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Donna E Stewart
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gagliardi AR, Kim C, Jameel B. Physician behaviours that optimize patient-centred care: Focus groups with migrant women. Health Expect 2020; 23:1280-1288. [PMID: 32707600 PMCID: PMC7696129 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No prior research studied how to implement patient-centred care (PCC) for migrant women, who face inequities in health-care quality. This study explored migrant women's views about what constitutes PCC and how to achieve it. DESIGN We conducted a qualitative study involving three focus groups with migrant women living in Toronto, Canada, recruited from English language classes at a community settlement agency, used constant comparative technique to inductively analyse transcripts and interpreted themes against a published PCC framework. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-three migrant women aged 25-78 from 10 countries participated. RESULTS Women articulated 28 physician behaviours important to them across six PCC domains: foster a healing relationship, exchange information, address concerns, manage uncertainty, share decisions and enable self-care. They emphasized the PCC domain of exchanging information, which included 13 (46.4%) of 28 behaviours: listen to reason for visit, ask questions, provided detailed explanations, communicate clearly, ensure privacy and provide additional information. Women said that instead of practising these behaviours, physicians rushed through discussions, and ignored or dismissed their concerns and questions. As a result, women said that physicians may not fully understand their problem, and they may refrain from stating important details or avoid seeking care. CONCLUSIONS This research characterized the lack of PCC experienced by migrant women and revealed specific physician behaviours to optimize PCC for migrant women. Research is needed to develop and evaluate the impact of strategies targeted at migrant women, physicians and health-care systems to support PCC for migrant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Kim
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bismah Jameel
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim C, Armstrong MJ, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. How to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in clinical guidelines: A scoping review. Health Expect 2020; 23:1028-1036. [PMID: 32656807 PMCID: PMC7696279 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines optimize care delivery and outcomes. Guidelines support patient engagement and adherence if they reflect patient preferences for treatment options, risks and benefits. Many guidelines do not address patient preferences. Developers require insight on how to develop such guidelines. OBJECTIVE To conduct a scoping review on how to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in guidelines. SEARCH We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, OpenGrey and GreyLit from 2010 to November 2019. ELIGIBILITY We included English language studies describing patient preferences and guidelines. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We reported approaches for and determinants and impacts of identifying patient preferences using summary statistics and text, and interpreted findings using a conceptual framework of patient engagement in guideline development. RESULTS Sixteen studies were included: 2 consulted patients and providers about patient engagement approaches, and 14 identified patient preferences (42.9%) or methods for doing so (71.4%). Studies employed single (57.1%) or multiple (42.9%) methods for identifying preferences. Eight (57.1%) incorporated preferences in one aspect of guideline development, while 6 (42.9%) incorporated preferences in multiple ways, most commonly to identify questions, benefits or harms, and generate recommendations. Studies did not address patient engagement in many guideline development steps. Included studies were too few to establish the best approaches for identifying or incorporating preferences. Fewer than half of the studies (7, 43.8%) explored barriers. None examined reporting preferences in guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Research is needed to establish the single or multiple approaches that result in incorporating and reporting preferences in all guideline development steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Kim
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nyhof BB, Jameel B, Dunn S, Grace SL, Khanlou N, Stewart DE, Gagliardi AR. Identifying strategies to implement patient-centred care for women: Qualitative interviews with women. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103:1422-1427. [PMID: 32063437 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient-centred care (PCC) is one approach for mitigating gendered inequities in health care quality. Little is known about how to implement PCC for women (PCCW). This study explored women's views about PCCW implementation. METHODS Descriptive analysis of semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews with diverse women about PCC using an established 6-domain PCC framework. RESULTS Participants were 33 women who varied in health care experience, age, education and setting. Themes were consistent across these characteristics. Women said that clinicians often dismissed their healthcare concerns. We transformed desired PCC elements into strategies to implement PCCW, 27 at the point-of-care (i.e. assume a non-judgmental disposition, demonstrate active listening, elicit questions, acknowledge emotions, explore preferences for treatment, and offer self-care information) and 3 at the system level (education for women/girls and clinicians about PCCW, widespread access to women's-only services or women clinicians). CONCLUSION Many women experienced suboptimal PCC. By sharing their PCC experiences, women identified PCC elements of importance to them, and insight on actionable point-of-care and system-level strategies to implement PCCW. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This study revealed numerous ways that clinicians can foster PCCW, and insight on how healthcare managers and policy-makers can support PCCW implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryanna B Nyhof
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bismah Jameel
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sheila Dunn
- Women's College Hospital Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sherry L Grace
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Donna E Stewart
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Blackwood J, Armstrong MJ, Schaefer C, Graham ID, Knaapen L, Straus SE, Urquhart R, Gagliardi AR. How do guideline developers identify, incorporate and report patient preferences? An international cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:458. [PMID: 32448198 PMCID: PMC7247137 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05343-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines based on patient preferences differ from those developed solely by clinicians and may promote patient adherence to guideline recommendations. There is scant evidence on how to develop patient-informed guidelines. This study aimed to describe how guideline developers identify, incorporate and report patient preferences. Methods We employed a descriptive cross-sectional survey design. Eligible organizations were non-profit agencies who developed at least one guideline in the past five years and had considered patient preferences in guideline development. We identified developers through the Guidelines International Network and publicly-available guideline repositories, administered the survey online, and used summary statistics to report results. Results The response rate was 18.3% (52/284). Respondents included professional societies, and government, academic, charitable and healthcare delivery organizations from 18 countries with at least 1 to ≥6 years of experience generating patient-informed guidelines. Organizations most frequently identified preferences through patient panelists (86.5%) and published research (84.6%). Most organizations (48, 92.3%) used multiple approaches to identify preferences (median 3, range 1 to 5). Most often, organizations used preferences to generate recommendations (82.7%) or establish guideline questions (73.1%). Few organizations explicitly reported preferences; instead, they implicitly embedded preferences in guideline recommendations (82.7%), questions (73.1%), or point-of-care communication tools (61.5%). Most developers had little capacity to generate patient-informed guidelines. Few offered training to patients (30.8%), or had dedicated funding (28.9%), managers (9.6%) or staff (9.6%). Respondents identified numerous barriers to identifying preferences. They also identified processes, resources and clinician- and patient-strategies that can facilitate the development of patient-informed guidelines. In contrast to identifying preferences, developers noted few approaches for, or barriers or facilitators of incorporating or reporting preferences. Conclusions Developers emphasized the need for knowledge on how to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in guidelines. In particular, how to use patient preferences to formulate recommendations, and transparently report patient preferences and the influence of preferences on guidelines is unknown. Still, insights from responding developers may help others who may be struggling to generate guidelines informed by patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayden Blackwood
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA
| | - Corinna Schaefer
- Evidence Based Medicine and Guidelines, Agency for Quality in Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Loes Knaapen
- School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nyhof BB, Wright FC, Look Hong NJ, Groot G, Helyer L, Meiers P, Quan ML, Baxter NN, Urquhart R, Warburton R, Gagliardi AR. Identifying opportunities to support patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: qualitative interviews with clinicians. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:364. [PMID: 32354355 PMCID: PMC7191683 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06821-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) report poor patient-clinician communication, and long-lasting confusion and anxiety about their treatment and prognosis. Research shows that patient-centred care (PCC) improves patient experience and outcomes. Little is known about the clinician experience of delivering PCC for DCIS. This study characterized communication challenges faced by clinicians, and interventions they need to improve PCC for DCIS. Methods Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit Canadian clinicians by specialty, gender, years of experience, setting, and geographic location. Qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone. Data were analyzed using constant comparison. Findings were mapped to a cancer-specific, comprehensive PCC framework to identify opportunities for improvement. Results Clinicians described approaches they used to address the PCC domains of fostering a healing relationship, exchanging information, and addressing emotions, but do not appear to be addressing the domains of managing uncertainty, involving women in making decisions, or enabling self-management. However, many clinicians described challenges or variable practices for all PCC domains but fostering a healing relationship. Clinicians vary in describing DCIS as cancer based on personal beliefs. When exchanging information, most find it difficult to justify treatment while assuring women of a good prognosis, and feel frustrated when women remain confused despite their efforts to explain it. While they recognize confusion and anxiety among women, clinicians said that patient navigators, social workers, support groups and high-quality information specific to DCIS are lacking. Despite these challenges, clinicians said they did not need or want communication interventions. Conclusions Findings represent currently unmet opportunities by which to help clinicians enhance PCC for DCIS, and underscore the need for supplemental information and supportive care specific to DCIS. Future research is needed to develop and test communication interventions that improve PCC for DCIS. If effective and widely implemented, this may contribute to improved care experiences and outcomes for women diagnosed with and treated for DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryanna B Nyhof
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada.
| | | | | | - Gary Groot
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Pamela Meiers
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Nancy N Baxter
- St Michael's Hospital Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Department of Surgery and the Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Retrouvey H, Zhong T, Gagliardi AR, Baxter NN, Webster F. How Ineffective Interprofessional Collaboration Affects Delivery of Breast Reconstruction to Breast Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2299-2310. [PMID: 32297084 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08463-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the benefits of breast reconstruction (BR), health care professionals do not consistently integrate it as an option in the treatment of breast cancer patients. Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) amongst professionals may facilitate the elaboration of comprehensive oncological treatment plans. As the application of IPC in the delivery of BR has not yet been studied, we undertook a qualitative study to explore the perceptions of physicians and administrators on IPC in breast cancer care and how these impact BR delivery. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 30 participants (22 physicians and 8 administrators). Physician interviews focused on their personal beliefs and values regarding BR, while administrator interviews explored their institutional treatment regimens as well as the availability of a BR program. Our thematic analysis was informed by the Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative (CIHC) competency framework. RESULTS IPC challenges were thought by participants to affect the delivery of BR. At the physician level, a lack of role clarity as well as the absence of an explicitly established leader negatively influence collaboration in BR delivery. In addition, varying views on the usefulness of BR and on the role of plastic surgeons in breast oncological teams discourage positive collaboration, rendering the delivery of BR more difficult. CONCLUSIONS The delivery of BR is overall impaired due to a lack of effective IPC. IPC could be improved through clarifying physician roles, establishing clear leadership, and aligning viewpoints on quality oncological care in collaborative teams; ultimately, this may promote equitable BR delivery for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Retrouvey
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Toni Zhong
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery and LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fiona Webster
- Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Filler T, Dunn S, Grace SL, Straus SE, Stewart DE, Gagliardi AR. Multi-level strategies to tailor patient-centred care for women: qualitative interviews with clinicians. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:212. [PMID: 32169069 PMCID: PMC7071699 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05082-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centered care (PCC) is one approach for ameliorating persistent gendered disparities in health care quality, yet no prior research has studied how to achieve patient-centred care for women (PCCW). The purpose of this study was to explore how clinicians deliver PCCW, challenges they face, and the strategies they suggest are needed to support PCCW. METHODS We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews (25-60 min) with clinicians. Thirty-seven clinicians representing 7 specialties (family physicians, cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, obstetricians/gynecologist, psychiatrists, nurses, social workers) who manage depression (n = 16), cardiovascular disease (n = 11) and contraceptive counseling (n = 10), conditions that affect women across the lifespan. We used constant comparative analysis to inductively analyze transcripts, mapped themes to a 6-domain PCC conceptual framework to interpret findings, and complied with qualitative research reporting standards. RESULTS Clinicians said that women don't always communicate their health concerns and physicians sometimes disregard women's health concerns, warranting unique PCC approaches.. Clinicians described 39 approaches they used to tailor PCC for women across 6 PCC domains: foster a healing relationship, exchange information, address emotions/concerns, manage uncertainty, make decisions, and enable self-management. Additional conditions that facilitated PCCW were: privacy, access to female clinicians, accommodating children through onsite facilities, and flexible appointment formats and schedules. Clinicians suggested 7 strategies needed to address barriers of PCCW they identified at the: patient-level (online appointments, transport to health services, use of patient partners to plan and/or deliver services), clinician-level (medical training and continuing professional development in PCC and women's health), and system-level (funding models for longer appointment times, multidisciplinary teamwork to address all PCC domains). CONCLUSIONS Our research revealed numerous strategies that clinicians can use to optimize PCCW, and health care managers and policy-makers can use to support PCCW through programs and policies. Identified strategies addressed all domains of an established PCC conceptual framework. Future research should evaluate the implementation and impact of these strategies on relevant outcomes such as perceived PCC among women and associated clinical outcomes to prepare for broad scale-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tali Filler
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada
| | | | - Sherry L Grace
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada.,York University, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Donna E Stewart
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gagliardi AR, Dunn S, Foster AM, Grace SL, Khanlou N, Stewart DE, Straus SE. Is patient-centred care for women a priority for policy-makers? Content analysis of government policies. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:23. [PMID: 32070365 PMCID: PMC7029558 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-0533-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considerable research shows that women experience gendered disparities in healthcare access and quality. Patient-centred care (PCC) could reduce inequities by addressing the patient's clinical and personal needs. Healthcare policies can influence service delivery to optimise patient outcomes. This study assessed whether and how government policies recognise and promote PCC for women (PCCW). METHODS We analysed the content of English-language policies published in Canada from 2010 to 2018 on depression and cardiac rehabilitation - conditions featuring known gendered inequities - that were identified on government websites. We extracted data and used summary statistics to enumerate mentions of PCC and women's health. RESULTS We included 30 policies (20 depression, 10 cardiac rehabilitation). Of those, 20 (66.7%) included any content related to PCC (median 1.0, range 0.0 to 5.0), most often exchanging information (14, 46.7%) and making decisions (13, 43.3%). Less frequent domains were enabling self-management (8, 26.7%), addressing emotions (6, 20.0%) and fostering the relationship (4, 13.3%). No policies included content for the domain of managing uncertainty. A higher proportion of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines included PCC content. Among the 30 policies, 7 (23.3%) included content related to at least one women's health domain (median 0.0, range 0.0 to 3.0). Most frequently included were social determinants of health (4, 13.3%). Fewer policies mentioned any issues to consider for women (2, 28.6%), issues specific to subgroups of women (2, 28.6%) or distinguished care for women from men (2, 28.6%). No policies included mention of abuse or violence, or discrimination or stigma. The policies largely pertained to depression. Despite mention of PCC or women's health, policies offered brief, vague guidance on how to achieve PCCW; for example, "Patients value being involved in decision-making" and "Women want care that is collaborative, woman- and family-centered, and culturally sensitive." CONCLUSIONS Despite considerable evidence of need and international recommendations, most policies failed to recognise gendered disparities or promote PCC as a mitigating strategy. These identified gaps represent opportunities by which government policies could be developed or strengthened to support PCCW. Future research should investigate complementary strategies such as equipping policy-makers with the evidence and tools required to develop PCCW-informed policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada.
| | - Sheila Dunn
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto and Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, M5S1B2, Canada
| | - Angel M Foster
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N6N5, Canada
| | - Sherry L Grace
- York University and University Health Network, Toronto, M3J1P3, Canada
| | | | - Donna E Stewart
- University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, M5B1W8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zych MM, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. Conceptualising the initiation of researcher and research user partnerships: a meta-narrative review. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:24. [PMID: 32070367 PMCID: PMC7029453 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-0536-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Integrated knowledge translation refers to researcher and research user partnerships to co-generate and implement knowledge. This type of partnership may be critical to success in increasing knowledge use and impact, but the conceptualisation of its initiation has not been fully developed. Initiating this type of partnership has proven to be challenging but crucial to its success. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-narrative review of partnership initiation concepts, processes, enablers, barriers and outcomes in the disciplines of healthcare and social sciences where examples of researcher and research user partnerships were found. Methods Seven research traditions were identified. Three were in the discipline of social sciences (including psychology, education and business) and five were in the discipline of healthcare (including medicine, nursing, public health, health services research). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ABI Inform, ERIC, PsychInfo and the Cochrane Library on June 9, 2017. Fifty titles and abstracts were screened in triplicate; data were extracted from three records in duplicate. Narratives comprised of study characteristics and conceptual and empirical findings across traditions were tabulated, summarised and compared. Results A total of 7779 unique results were identified and 17 reviews published from 1998 to 2017 were eligible. All reviews identified a partnership initiation phase referred to as ‘early’ or ‘developmental’, or more vaguely as ‘fuzzy’, across six traditions – integrated knowledge translation, action research, stakeholder engagement, knowledge transfer, team initiation and shared mental models. The partnership initiation processes, enablers, barriers and outcomes were common to multiple narratives and summarised in a Partnership Initiation Conceptual Framework. Our review revealed limited use or generation of theory in most included reviews, and little empirical evidence testing the links between partnership initiation processes, enablers or barriers, and outcomes for the purpose of describing successful researcher and research user partnership initiation. Conclusions Narratives across multiple research traditions revealed similar integrated knowledge translation initiation processes, enablers, barriers and outcomes, which were captured in a conceptual framework that can be employed by researchers and research users to study and launch partnerships. While partnership initiation was recognised, it remains vaguely conceptualised despite lengthy research in several fields of study. Ongoing research of partnership initiation is needed to identify or generate relevant theory, and to empirically establish outcomes and the determinants of those outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Maddalena Zych
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada.
| | - Whitney B Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada.,Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fullerton LM, Brooks S, Sweezie R, Ahluwalia V, Bombardier C, Gagliardi AR. Patient, Rheumatologist and Therapist Perspectives on the Implementation of an Allied Health Rheumatology Triage (AHRT) Initiative in Ontario Rheumatology Clinics. Pragmat Obs Res 2020; 11:1-12. [PMID: 32095089 PMCID: PMC6995293 DOI: 10.2147/por.s213966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this qualitative study was to explore patient, rheumatologist, and extended role practitioner (ERP) perspectives on the integration of an allied health rheumatology triage (AHRT) intervention in Ontario rheumatology clinics. Triage is the process of identifying the urgency of a patient's condition to ensure they receive specialist care within an appropriate length of time. This research explores the clinical/logistical impact of triage by occupational and physical therapists with advanced arthritis training (ERPs), including facilitators and barriers of success, and recommendations for future application. Participants and Methods Semi-structured telephone interviews were held with participating rheumatologists, ERPs, and a sample of patients from each clinical site (4 community, 3 hospital) in five Ontario cities. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using basic qualitative description. Two independent researchers compared coding and achieved consensus. Results Patients (n=10), rheumatologists (n=6), and ERPs (n=5) participated in the study and reported reduced wait-times to rheumatology care, diagnosis, and treatment for those with inflammatory arthritis (IA). Rheumatologists and ERPs perceived that the intervention improved clinical efficiency and quality of care. Patients reported high satisfaction with ERP assessments, valuing early joint examination/laboratory tests, urgent referral if needed, and the provision of information, support, and management strategies. Facilitators of success included: supportive clinical staff, regular communication and collaboration between rheumatologist and ERP, and sufficient clinical space. Recommendations included extending ERP roles to include stable patient follow-up, and ERP care between scheduled rheumatology appointments. Conclusion Findings support the integration of ERPs in a triage role in the community and hospital-based rheumatology models of care. Future research is needed to explore the impact of utilizing ERPs for stable patient follow-up in rheumatology settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Fullerton
- Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative, Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sydney Brooks
- Ontario Division, Arthritis Society, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raquel Sweezie
- Ontario Division, Arthritis Society, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vandana Ahluwalia
- Department of Rheumatology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | - Claire Bombardier
- Toronto General Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sawka AM, Gagliardi AR, Haymart MR, Sturgeon C, Bernet V, Hoff K, Angelos P, Brito JP, Haugen BR, Kim B, Kopp PA, Mandel SJ, Ross DS, Samuels M, Sarne D, Sinclair C, Jonklaas J. A Survey of American Thyroid Association Members Regarding the 2015 Adult Thyroid Nodule and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines. Thyroid 2020; 30:25-33. [PMID: 31830853 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2019.0486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on management of thyroid nodules (TNs) and differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in adults were developed to inform clinicians, patients, researchers, and health policy makers about the best available evidence, and its limitations, relating to management of these conditions. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of ATA members' perspectives of these CPGs, using a standardized survey (Clinician Guidelines Determinant Questionnaire) developed by the Guidelines International Network. A survey link was electronically mailed to members in February of 2019, with reminders sent to nonrespondents 2 and 5 weeks later. Data were descriptively summarized, after excluding missing responses. Results: The overall response rate was 19.8% (348/1761). The effective response rate was 20.2% (348/1720), after excluding a recently deceased member and individuals who had either invalid e-mail addresses or whose e-mails were returned. Of the respondents, 37.9% (132/348) were female, 60.4% (209/346) were endocrinologists, 27.5% (95/346) were surgeons, and 3.5% (12/346) were nuclear medicine specialists. The majority of respondents (71.9%; 250/348) were at a mid- or advanced-career level, and more than half were in academia (57.5%; 195/339). The majority (69.8%; 243/348) practiced in North America. The vast majority of respondents indicated that the CPGs explained the underlying evidence (92.3%; 298/323) and 92.9% (300/323) agreed or strongly agreed with the content. Most respondents stated that they regularly used the CPGs in their practice (83.0%; 268/323). Most respondents (83.0%; 268/323) also agreed or strongly agreed that the recommendations were easy to incorporate in their practice. The most popular CPG format was an electronic desktop file (78.8%; 252/320). Shorter more frequent CPGs were favored by 55.0% (176/320) of respondents, and longer traditional CPGs were favored by 39.7% (127/320). Conclusions: The clinical content and evidence explanations in the adult TN and DTC CPGs are widely accepted and applied among ATA survey respondents. Future ATA CPG updates need to be optimized to best meet users' preferences regarding format, frequency, and length.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Sawka
- Division of Endocrinology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Megan R Haymart
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Cord Sturgeon
- Division of Endocrine Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Victor Bernet
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Kelly Hoff
- American Thyroid Association, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Peter Angelos
- Division of Endocrine Surgery, General Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Juan P Brito
- Division of Endocrinology and Knowledge Evaluation and Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bryan R Haugen
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brian Kim
- Division of Endocrinology, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Peter A Kopp
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Susan J Mandel
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Douglas S Ross
- Division of Endocrinology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Samuels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
| | - David Sarne
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Catherine Sinclair
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline Jonklaas
- Division of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS, Gagliardi AR, Mullins CD. Participation and consultation engagement strategies have complementary roles: A case study of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guideline development. Health Expect 2019; 23:423-432. [PMID: 31884708 PMCID: PMC7104634 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient and public involvement (PPI) is recommended when developing high‐quality clinical practice guidelines, but the effects of different PPI strategies are largely unstudied. Objective To assess the impact of participation and consultation strategies on guideline question development. Design Instrumental case study design. Setting and participants This study used a clinical practice guideline in development by the American Academy of Neurology. A patient, two caregivers and a dementia advocate participated in the guideline development group alongside clinicians. The guideline protocol was posted for public consultation for 30 days. Interventions studied Participation (patient representatives on the guideline development group) and consultation (public comment, survey) PPI strategies. Main outcome measures Public comment responses and guideline development group meeting transcripts were analysed descriptively. Transcript quotes were compared to the conceptual model of PPI in guideline development. The effects of participation and consultation strategies within the guideline case were compared. Results Participation strategies shaped discussions, set a patient‐centred scope, highlighted personal aspects of disease, affected how professionals viewed PPI, identified issues overlooked by medical professionals, and contributed to selecting patient‐relevant guideline populations and outcomes. Professionals responded to public comment more than patient representatives. Patient survey participants confirmed the priorities voiced by patient representatives on the guideline development group. Final guideline questions included populations and outcomes promoted by patient representatives despite negative feedback from professional public commenters. Discussion and conclusions Participation and consultation PPI strategies have different advantages. Congruence between strategies increases the strength of the patient voice. Guideline developers should prioritize using both strategies for successful PPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gary S Gronseth
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Daniel Mullins
- Pharmaceutical Health Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Khan Y, Brown AD, Gagliardi AR, O’Sullivan T, Lacarte S, Henry B, Schwartz B. Are we prepared? The development of performance indicators for public health emergency preparedness using a modified Delphi approach. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0226489. [PMID: 31869359 PMCID: PMC6927653 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disasters and emergencies from infectious diseases, extreme weather and anthropogenic events are increasingly common. While risks vary for different communities, disaster and emergency preparedness is recognized as essential for all nation-states. Evidence to inform measurement of preparedness is lacking. The objective of this study was to identify and define a set of public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) indicators to advance performance measurement for local/regional public health agencies. METHODS A three-round modified Delphi technique was employed to develop indicators for PHEP. The study was conducted in Canada with a national panel of 33 experts and completed in 2018. A list of indicators was derived from the literature. Indicators were rated by importance and actionability until achieving consensus. RESULTS The scoping review resulted in 62 indicators being included for rating by the panel. Panel feedback provided refinements to indicators and suggestions for new indicators. In total, 76 indicators were proposed for rating across all three rounds; of these, 67 were considered to be important and actionable PHEP indicators. CONCLUSIONS This study developed an indicator set of 67 PHEP indicators, aligned with a PHEP framework for resilience. The 67 indicators represent important and actionable dimensions of PHEP practice in Canada that can be used by local/regional public health agencies and validated in other jurisdictions to assess readiness and measure improvement in their critical role of protecting community health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin Khan
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adalsteinn D. Brown
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tracey O’Sullivan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Bonnie Henry
- Office of the Provincial Health Officer, Ministry of Health, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brian Schwartz
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|