Prenatal and neonatal complications of COVID-19: A systematic review

Impact of COVID-19 on emotional and behavioral problems among preschool children: a meta-analysis

The impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on society is continuous, resulting in negative psychological consequences. Given the vulnerability and sensitivity to the environment among preschool children, their emotional and behavioral problems deserve more attention. The current study aimed to explore the impact of the epidemic on preschool children's mental health by determining the pooled prevalence of emotional and behavioral problems amidst the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic and to reveal potential reasons for variations between studies. Published studies were searched in Embase, PubMed, ProQuest, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang. Based on the inclusion criteria outlined in this study, a total of 10 studies encompassing 38,059 participants were incorporated. Employing a random-effect model for estimating the prevalence of emotional and behavioral problems, the results revealed a pooled prevalence rate of 24.3% (95% CI, 0.15-0.38; I²=99.9%) among preschool children. This rate surpasses the pre-outbreak prevalence observed in different countries, signifying a detrimental influence of the epidemic on the mental well-being of preschoolers. Therefore, mental health care and recovery are essential for the vulnerable group during and after the public health crisis. Specific emotional and behavioral problems among preschool children are expected to be researched in the future to provide more targeted guidance for intervention.

Optimal resource allocation model for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A lack of health resources is a common problem after the outbreak of infectious diseases, and resource optimization is an important means to solve the lack of prevention and control capacity caused by resource constraints. This study systematically evaluated the similarities and differences in the application of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) resource allocation models and analyzed the effects of different optimal resource allocations on epidemic control.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted of CNKI, WanFang, VIP, CBD, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase for articles published from January 1, 2019, through November 23, 2023. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies, extracted and cross-checked the data. Moreover, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 22 articles were included for systematic review; in the application of optimal allocation models, 59.09% of the studies used propagation dynamics models to simulate the allocation of various resources, and some scholars also used mathematical optimization functions (36.36%) and machine learning algorithms (31.82%) to solve the problem of resource allocation; the results of the systematic review show that differential equation modeling was more considered when testing resources optimization, the optimization function or machine learning algorithm were mostly used to optimize the bed resources; the meta-analysis results showed that the epidemic trend was obviously effectively controlled through the optimal allocation of resources, and the average control efficiency was 0.38(95%CI 0.25-0.51); Subgroup analysis revealed that the average control efficiency from high to low was health specialists 0.48(95%CI 0.37-0.59), vaccines 0.47(95%CI 0.11-0.82), testing 0.38(95%CI 0.19-0.57), personal protective equipment (PPE) 0.38(95%CI 0.06-0.70), beds 0.34(95%CI 0.14-0.53), medicines and equipment for treatment 0.32(95%CI 0.12-0.51); Funnel plots and Egger's test showed no publication bias, and sensitivity analysis suggested robust results.

CONCLUSION

When the data are insufficient and the simulation time is short, the researchers mostly use the constructor for research; When the data are relatively sufficient and the simulation time is long, researchers choose differential equations or machine learning algorithms for research. In addition, our study showed that control efficiency is an important indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of epidemic prevention and control. Through the optimization of medical staff and vaccine allocation, greater prevention and control effects can be achieved.

Frequency of Maternal Anemia in Patients Presenting With Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

BACKGROUND

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the rupture of fetal membranes before 38 weeks of gestation. The etiology is multifactorial. Maternal anemia is one of the factors leading to PPROM. This study aims to determine the frequency of maternal anemia in patients presenting with PPROM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. This study was conducted from July 1 to December 31, 2021. One hundred and twenty two patients with PPROM presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology were included. The diagnosis of PPROM was made based on the history of the PV leak, followed by confirmation with the nitrazine litmus test, microscopic fern test, and ultrasonographic amniotic fluid index measurement. Anemia was determined by examination of hemoglobin levels in the maternal blood samples. Hb <11gm/dl was labeled as anemia. IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

 The age of the patients ranged from 20 to 40 years. The mean age was 29.14 ± 6.194 years. 63 patients (51.6%) were multiparous (parity 2 to 4). Maternal anemia was observed in 39 patients (32.0%). A significant association (p = 0.005) was observed between maternal anemia and grand multiparity (parity 2 to 4).

CONCLUSION

 Maternal anemia significantly contributes to PPROM, especially in multiple pregnancies. Meticulous family planning and consistent obstetrical monitoring throughout pregnancy are key to addressing this, potentially reducing both maternal anemia risk and PPROM complications.

Empyema thoracic in a neonate co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and staphylococcus arouse successfully treated with fibrinolysis: a brief report

BACKGROUND

Empyema as a rare cause of respiratory distress in neonatal period has not yet been reported after Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and even rarely in the context of bacterial infections is age group.

CASE PRESENTATION

The first neonate of quadruplets, resulting from Cesarean-Section of a 30-year-old mother without a history of previous illness, born at 34 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 1600 gram. All four newborns were hospitalized; while the first one underwent nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 6 and fractional inspired oxygen of 0.6, due to respiratory distress, noting a respiratory score of five out of 12.She was resuscitated one hour later due to bradycardia and underwent ventilator support. She received a single dose of pulmonary surfactant, intravenous paracetamol, and phenobarbital due to respiratory distress syndrome, Pectus Ductus Arteriosus, and unilateral clonic movements, respectively. In the lack of positive blood culture, she extubated two days later and breast-feeding was started. On day eight, she underwent high flow nasal cannula. On day 12, she suddenly developed respiratory distress, mottling, and abdominal distension, leading to N-CPAP and re-evaluation. The nasopharyngeal sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) real time Polymerase chain reaction and the blood culture for staphylococcus aurous became positive. A large volume pleural effusion including septa and loculation in right hemi-thorax on chest computerized tomography scan and ultrasound was seen, necessitating to thoracotomy, which was not possible due to her general condition. Remdesivir was started and antibiotics changed to a more broad-spectrum coverage. Chest tube was inserted and Alteplase was injected for three consecutive days with beneficial effects. She had no problem for six-month follow up.

CONCLUSION

This was a case of empyema thoracic in the context of SARS-CoV-2 and Staphylococcus arouses co-infection. In our experience, it can be treated by chest drainage and fibrinolysis in neonatal period.

Impact of COVID-19 on feto-maternal and neonatal health in Karachi, Pakistan, A retrospective cohort study

Scientific literature suggests that pregnant women are at greater risk of acquiring a more severe form of COVID-19 exposing both mother and child to a higher risk of obstetric and neonatal complications. These include increased hospitalization rates, ICU admissions, or ventilatory support among pregnant women when compared to COVID-19 negative pregnant womenA case-control study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan with the objective of evaluating the clinical presentation of COVID-19 in pregnancy and its effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Data was retrospectively collected from April 2020 till January 2022 of obstetric patients with COVID-19 positive cases and were compared with COVID-19 negative cases from the same time. A total of 491 women were included in the study, 244 cases and 247 controls. The most common complication amongst cases was gestational diabetes mellitus (n = 59, 24%), followed by gestational hypertension (n = 16, 31.7%), pre-eclampsia (n = 13, 5%) Pre-rupture of membrane (85.7%). Amongst the COVID positive mothers the most common presenting complaints were fever followed by dry cough, headache, and shortness of breath. It was observed that COVID-19 did not result in increased adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes compared to COVID-19 negative mothers.

Maternal Fever and Reduced Fetal Movement as Predictive Risk Factors for Adverse Neonatal Outcome in Cases of Congenital SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data from Case Reports and Case Series

OBJECTIVES

To determine risk factors for primary and secondary adverse neonatal outcomes in newborns with congenital SARS-CoV-2 infection.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar from January 2020 to January 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

newborns delivered after 24 weeks of gestation with confirmed/possible congenital SARS-CoV-2 infection, according to standard classification criteria.

METHODS

Execution of the IPD analyses followed the PRISMA-IPD statement. Univariate non-parametric tests compared numerical data distributions. Fisher's exact or Chi-square test determined categorical variables' statistical significance. Multivariate logistic regression revealed risk factors for adverse neonatal outcome.

RESULTS

Maternal fever was associated with symptomatic congenital infection (OR: 4.55, 95% CI: 1.33-15.57). Two-thirds of women that reported decreased fetal movements were diagnosed with IUFD (p-value = 0.001). Reduced fetal movement increased the risk of intrauterine fetal death by 7.84 times (p-value = 0.016, 95% CI: 2.23-27.5). The risk of stillbirth decreased with gestational age at the time of maternal infection (p-value < 0.05, OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal fever and perception of reduced fetal movement may be predictive risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome in cases with congenital SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Retraction statement: Prenatal and neonatal complications of COVID-19: A systematic review

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.510.].

Effect of COVID-19 on Pregnancy and Neonate's Vital Parameters: A Systematic Review

Background

COVID-19 is a new pandemic, which was declared by the World Health Organization in 2019 as a threat to public health. According to numerous reports, it can have negative consequences for pregnant women, labour, and neonates born to infected mothers. The aim of this paper was to gather the evidence and to present a summary of the results of studies concerning COVID-19 in pregnant women and their neonates.

Methods

Articles from prestigious journals covering the period from 2020 to February 2023, relevant review papers, and original research articles from PubMed were analysed. In order to analyse the available research literature, the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases were used, in which the search for articles was conducted using terms ("pregnancy," "coronavirus," "SARS-CoV-2," and "newborn") and using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines for clinical trials. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews (2022-2023) on symptoms, neonatal course, and risk of COVID-19 infection have been summarized. Summary of meta-analyses and systematic reviews (2022-2023) on the effect and adverse reaction of the COVID-19 vaccination is presented.

Results

As a result of the research conducted, it was confirmed that in most pregnant women, no serious signs of the infection were observed, although isolated cases of death related to COVID-19 in pregnant women were reported. Several authors called attention to the more severe course of the infection in pregnant women with obesity. It seemed that no vertical transmission from mother to child was occurring. Nevertheless, the information was not clinching. The condition of the neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 was in most cases described as normal; however, some papers reported deaths of infected neonates.

Conclusions

Due to insufficient data, further research is necessary. Further studies and follow-up are recommended, which would make possible an assessment of remote effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy and vital parameters of the newborn.

Assessment of the scope, completeness, and consistency of various drug information resources related to COVID-19 medications in pregnancy and lactation

BACKGROUND

Drug use in pregnancy and lactation is challenging. It becomes more challenging in pregnant and lactating women with certain critical clinical conditions such as COVID-19, because of inconsistent drug safety data. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the various drug information resources for the scope, completeness, and consistency of the information related to COVID-19 medications in pregnancy and lactation.

METHODS

Data related to COVID-19 medications from various drug information resources such as text references, subscription databases, and free online tools were used for the comparison. The congregated data were analyzed for scope, completeness, and consistency.

RESULTS

Scope scores were highest for Portable Electronic Physician Information Database (PEPID), Up-to-date, and drugs.com compared to other resources. The overall completeness scores were higher for Micromedex and drugs.com (p < 0.05 compared to all other resources). The inter-reliability analysis for overall components by Fleiss kappa among all the resources was found to be 'slight' (k < 0.20, p < 0.0001). The information related to the older drugs in most of the resources, provides in-depth details on various components such as pregnancy safety, clinical data related to lactation, the effect of the drug distribution into breast milk, reproductive potential/infertility risk and the pregnancy category/recommendations. However, the information related to these components for newer drugs was superficial and incomplete, with insufficient data and inconclusive evidence, which is a statistically significant observation. The strength of observer agreement for the various COVID-19 medications ranged from poor to fair and moderate for the various recommendation categories studied.

CONCLUSION

This study reports discrepancies in the information related to pregnancy, lactation, drug level, reproductive risk, and pregnancy recommendations among the resources directing to refer to more than one resource for information about the safe and quality use of medications in this special population.The present study also emphasizes the need for development of comprehensive, evidence-based, and precise information guide that can promote safe and effective drug use in this special population.

In-utero vascular accidents in neonates from COVID-19 infected mothers

PURPOSE

Infection with COVID-19 during pregnancy has been associated with a hypercoagulable state. It is unknown if maternal COVID-19 infection results in congenital anomalies secondary to intrauterine vascular accidents. This study sought to determine if the rate of in-utero vascular complications (intestinal atresia and limb abnormalities) that may be attributable to the hypercoagulable states associated with COVID-19 and pregnancy increased after the onset of the pandemic.

METHODS

Pregnancy, neonatal, and congenital defect data from a single academic medical center and the partner's children's hospital were collected and compared to the period prior to onset of the pandemic. A subanalysis including pregnant woman 18 years or greater with documented COVID-19 infection during gestation between March 2020-2021 was performed.

RESULTS

Rates of intestinal atresia did not differ prior to or after the onset of the pandemic (3.78% vs 7.23%, p = 0.21) nor did rates of limb deficiency disorders (4.41% vs 9.65%, p = 0.09). On subanalysis, there were 194 women with COVID-19 infection included in analysis: 135 (69.6%) were positive during delivery admission and 59 (30.4%) were positive earlier in their pregnancy. There was one infant born with intestinal atresia.

CONCLUSION

We report a low incidence of congenital anomalies in infants born to mothers with COVID-19 infection. It remains unclear if the impact of COVID-19 on the coagulative state augments the normal pro-thrombotic state of pregnancy; ongoing surveillance is warranted.

Efficacy of kangaroo mother care combined with neonatal phototherapy in newborns with non-pathological jaundice: A meta-analysis

Background

The kangaroo-mother care method (KMC) is a skin-to-skin contact-centered care approach with numerous benefits for neonates, but its impact on the treatment of jaundiced neonates is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of KMC combined with neonatal phototherapy (NNPT) in treating neonates with non-pathological jaundice.

Methods

Relevant articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from database establishment to April 2022. The outcomes included, without limitation, serum bilirubin levels, and duration of phototherapy.

Results

This meta-analysis included five studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 1 observational study) involving four hundred eighty-two neonates with non-pathological jaundice. The results showed that the group receiving KMC combined with NNPT had lower serum bilirubin at 72 h after intervention [weighted mean difference (WMD) = −1.51, p = 0.03], shorter duration of phototherapy [standard mean difference (SMD) = −1.45, p &lt; 0.001] and shorter duration of hospitalization (SMD = −1.32, p = 0.002) compared to NNPT group. There was no difference in peak bilirubin in both groups of neonates (WMD = −0.12, p = 0.62).

Conclusions

KMC combined with NNPT helped to treat non-pathological jaundice in newborns compared to NNPT alone.

Observational cohort study of perinatal outcomes of women with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Understanding the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes and of pregnancy on COVID-19 outcomes is critical for ensuring proper prenatal and antenatal care. No similar studies have been published in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who presented at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC) in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. COVID-19 staging was performed, pregnancy-related complications were assessed, and neonatal infection was evaluated.

RESULTS

We enrolled 81 patients (mean age 31.75 years, SD 5.25) of which there were 17 cases in the first trimester, 20 in the second trimester, and 34 in the third trimester. The distribution of COVID-19 severity was 40 patients with Stage A, 36 with Stage B, 4 with Stage C, and 1 with Stage D. Complications were pregnancy loss in 2 patients (one in each first and second trimester) and 1 fetal death after 20 weeks of pregnancy, 7 patients with fetal growth restriction, and 8 with pre-term delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe an unusual frequency of pregnancy-related complications due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in this high-risk obstetric population and there was no evidence of vertical transmission in newborns from women who delivered while positive for the virus.

COVID-19 Infection Risk Following Elective Arthroplasty and Surgical Complications in COVID-19 Vaccinated Patients: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study

Background

We aimed to determine symptomatic Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rates within 1 month of elective arthroplasty for vaccinated individuals and to determine whether vaccination guarantees protection against COVID-19 after arthroplasty (primary outcome). In addition, the 90-day surgical complications were compared to those of an unvaccinated group (secondary outcome).

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted on elective joint arthroplasty patients at 3 tertiary hospitals in 2 major cities (Tehran and Isfahan) in our country (Iran). The outcomes of the COVID-19-vaccinated group were assessed between October 2021 and March 2022. Ninety-day surgical complications were compared with a historical cohort of unvaccinated patients treated earlier in the pandemic (April 2020-March 2021).

Results

The study included 1717 consecutive patients: 962 vaccinated and 755 unvaccinated. In the vaccinated group, 38 patients (3.9%) contracted COVID-19, 4 (10.5%) were hospitalized again, and none required intensive care unit admission. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that COVID-19-positive cases are more likely to be female (odds ratio [OR] = 12.5), to have visitors to their home (OR = 4.7), and to stay longer in the hospital (OR = 1.2) than COVID-19-negative cases. Compared to unvaccinated patients, the postoperative COVID-19 rate was not significantly different (3.9% vs 2.4%, P = .07). The incidence of surgical complications was similar between the 2 groups (P > .05).

Conclusions

The vaccination does not provide a guarantee that a patient will not contract COVID-19 following their arthroplasty surgery, especially in a region with a high rate of COVID-19. We believe reasonable perioperative COVID-19 precautions may be warranted even in vaccinated patients.

COVID-19 infection rate after urgent versus elective total hip replacement among unvaccinated individuals: A multicenter prospective cohort amid the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals have become unsafe for patients as potential sources of virus transmission. This study aims to determine the COVID-19 infection rate after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) among unvaccinated patients. THA patients undergoing elective or traumatic (urgent) THA were compared regarding COVID-19 contraction.

Methods

Primary THA patients were prospectively followed from three hospitals in *two great cities* of the country between April 2020 to August 2021. If the patient had suspected COVID-19 symptoms, had a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and/or chest CT scan.

Results

Finally, information was received from 436 patients, including 345 (79.1%) elective and 91 (20.9%) traumatic THAs. Eight patients (1.8%) contracted COVID-19 within a month after THA discharge, and two died due to COVID-19. There was no statistical difference between COVID-19 disease and type of surgery (elective 1.4% versus traumatic 3.3%, P = 0.24). Women (Odds ratio (95% CI) = 8.5 (2.1–35.2), P = 0.01) and those who have heart disease (Odds ratio with Haldane-Anscombe correction ≈ 14.0, P = 0.01) were more likely to contract COVID-19 postoperatively.

Conclusion

In both elective and urgent cases of THA, researchers found that there is not a high risk of contracting the virus during the peri-surgery period. Urgent THA surgeries are comparable to elective THA-with those strict pre-elective surgery protocols-in terms of COVID-19 risk of infection from the hospital stay if appropriate health protocols are followed.

•

The COVID-19 pandemic has made hospitals unsafe for elective surgeries.

•

Eight patients (from 491, 1.8%) were infected with COVID-19 within a month of THA.

•

Four were hospitalized due to severe symptoms.

•

Three of 91 traumatic (3.3%) and five among 345 elective cases (1.4%) were infected.

•

COVID-19 incidence is two-fold higher in urgent THA patients, but insignificant.