Cognitive effects of pregabalin in the treatment of long-term benzodiazepine-use and dependence

A prospective cohort of treatment-seeking patients with problematic use of prescription narcotic drugs: study protocol and baseline characteristics

BACKGROUND

There is limited knowledge on long-term outcomes of tapering treatment for individuals with problematic use of prescription narcotics, including opioids and benzodiazepines. The overall aim of the study is to investigate clinical trajectories and treatment outcomes of patients seeking treatment in addiction care.

METHODS

This paper presents the study protocol and baseline characteristics of a cohort of patients seeking treatment for problematic use of prescription narcotic drugs at specialized outpatient addiction services. Treatment for addiction at the clinic includes drug tapering and treatment for underlying psychiatric disorders. Data in this prospective cohort study is collected from biomarkers, self-report questionnaires, patient medical records, and national registers at baseline and follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

A clinical cohort of 405 participants were enrolled in the study between 2018 and 2023. The study population (57.5% women; 42.5% men) at baseline had a mean age of 49.2 years (SD = 14.0). Participants in the cohort had used prescription narcotics for 11 years on average before seeking treatment, with opioid analgesics (66.2%) being the most common at baseline, followed by benzodiazepines (50.9%). Most participants (75.9%) had received prescription narcotics from their health care provider, although illegal sources were common. Besides substance use disorders, many also had anxiety disorders (46.3%) and depression (40.4%) at baseline. Previous treatment for problematic alcohol or drug use were reported by 14.0% and 21.6%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

This prospective, naturalistic cohort will provide novel information on long-term outcomes of tapering treatment and identify prognostic factors for treatment success, including abstinence. Future papers will investigate individual and treatment-related characteristics of the patient population. Baseline data suggest that many patients with problematic use of prescription narcotics receive prescriptions over many years from their regular health care providers, which contradicts most clinical guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03713983 22/10/2018.

Anticonvulsant and antipsychotic medications in the pharmacotherapy of panic disorder: a structured review

BACKGROUND

As the remission rate of panic disorder (PD) achieved with conventional pharmacotherapy ranges between 20% and 50%, alternative psychopharmacological strategies are needed. We aimed to firstly review data regarding use of antipsychotic and non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsant medication in PD patients with or without comorbidities; secondly, to review data concerning reduction of panic symptoms during treatment of another psychiatric disorder with the same medications; and thirdly, to examine reports of anticonvulsant- or antipsychotic-induced new-onset panic symptomatology.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search (last day: 28 April 2020) of English-language studies only, combining psychopathological terms (e.g. 'panic disorder') and terms referring either to categories of psychotropic medications (e.g. 'anticonvulsants') or to specific drugs (e.g. 'carbamazepine'). All duplications were eliminated. All studies included in the review met certain inclusion/exclusion criteria. The level of evidence for the efficacy of each drug was defined according to widely accepted criteria.

RESULTS

In treatment-resistant PD, beneficial effects have been reported after treatment (mostly augmentation therapy) with a range of anticonvulsant (carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbamazepine, valproate, vigabatrin, tiagabine) and antipsychotic (aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, sulpiride) medications: overall, most medications appear generally well tolerated. Additionally, bipolar patients receiving valproate or quetiapine-XR (but not risperidone or ziprasidone) demonstrated reductions of comorbid panic-related symptoms. There are case reports of new-onset panic symptoms associated with clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine and topiramate, in patients with conditions other than PD. The small-to-modest sample size, the lack of control groups and the open-label and short-term nature of most of the reviewed studies hinder definitive conclusions regarding either the short-term and long-term efficacy of antipsychotic and anticonvulsant medications or their potential long-term side effects.

CONCLUSION

Some atypical antipsychotic and anticonvulsant medications may have a role in the treatment of some PD patients, mostly when more conventional approaches have not been successful, but the quality of supporting evidence is limited.

Consensus statements on the clinical uses of pregabalin for Hong Kong

To facilitate the understanding of pregabalin and optimize its clinical usage in Hong Kong, an expert panel (11 psychiatrists, one family physician and one anesthesiologist) experienced in treating anxiety and somatic symptoms was invited to establish a set of consensus statements based on several discussion areas. A non-systematic literature search for relevant articles was conducted. The panelists addressed the discussion areas by sharing their clinical experience and available literature in a couple of meetings. At the last meeting, consensus statements derived from the proceedings were discussed and finalized. A total of 11 statements were ultimately accepted by panel voting based on their practicability of recommendation in Hong Kong. These statements are aimed to act as a practical reference for local clinicians when they consider prescribing pregabalin in different clinical situations.

[Pregabalin and risk of addiction: A new care issue?]

PURPOSE

Pregabalin (PRG) is a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue used for treatment of epilepsy, neuropathic pain, generalised anxiety disorder and currently being studied for other indications. Supported by the results of case studies and a limited number of studies, there is an ongoing debate about the addictive potential of PRG. However, evidence is scarce and no definitive assessment on the potential for abuse and dependence to PRG is available. The objective of our study was to identify the number of cases of abuse or dependence to PRG published and to study potential risk factors of addiction to PRG.

METHODS

We have identified on PubMed and ScienceDirect published case studies of PRG abuse or dependence and analysed these cases on the basis of several clinical parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 118 cases of PRG abuse or dependence were identified, including 21 isolated cases (mean age 33 years, 67 % men). The mean daily dose of PRG was 2,9 g. Current or past polydrug abuse was present in the majority of cases. Psychiatric diagnoses, other than substance-related disorders, were reported in as many patients, and almost all patients experienced withdrawal symptoms when PRG was discontinued.

CONCLUSION

Current literature suggests an important and growing concern for the abuse of PRG. Male sex, psychiatric and/or addiction history, including opioid addiction, may be potential risk factors for the development of addictive behaviours associated with PRG.

Neuroimaging of traumatic brain injury in military personnel: An overview

BACKGROUND

The incidence of blunt-force traumatic brain injury (TBI) is especially prevalent in the military, where the emergency care admission rate has been reported to be 24.6-41.8 per 10,000 soldier-years. Given substantial advancements in modern neuroimaging techniques over the past decade in terms of structural, functional, and connectomic approaches, this mode of exploration can be viewed as best suited for understanding the underlying pathology and for providing proper intervention at effective time-points.

APPROACH

Here we survey neuroimaging studies of mild-to-severe TBI in military veterans with the intent to aid the field in the creation of a roadmap for clinicians and researchers whose aim is to understand TBI progression.

DISCUSSION

Recent advancements on the quantification of neurocognitive dysfunction, cellular dysfunction, intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow, inflammation, post-traumatic neuropathophysiology, on blood serum biomarkers and on their correlation to neuroimaging findings are reviewed to hypothesize how they can be used in conjunction with one another. This may allow clinicians and scientists to comprehensively study TBI in military service members, leading to new treatment strategies for both currently-serving as well as veteran personnel, and to improve the study of TBI more broadly.

Abuse Potential of Pregabalin: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Several case reports and epidemiological studies have raised concern about the abuse potential of pregabalin, the use of which has increased substantially over the last decade. Pregabalin is, in some cases, used for recreational purposes and it has incurred attention among drug abusers for causing euphoric and dissociative effects when taken in doses exceeding normal therapeutic dosages or used by alternative routes of administration, such as nasal insufflation or venous injection. The magnitude of the abuse potential and the mechanism behind it are not fully known.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present a systematic review of the data concerning the abuse potential of pregabalin.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search and reviewed the preclinical, clinical and epidemiological data on the abuse potential of pregabalin.

RESULTS

We included preclinical (n = 17), clinical (n = 19) and epidemiological (n = 13) studies addressing the abuse potential of pregabalin. We also reviewed case reports (n = 9) concerning abuse of pregabalin. The preclinical studies indicated that pregabalin possesses modulatory effects on the GABA and glutamate systems, leaving room for an abuse potential. Further, clinical studies reported euphoria as a frequent side effect in patients treated with pregabalin. The majority of case reports concerning abuse of pregabalin involved patients with a history of substance abuse and, similarly, epidemiological studies found evidence of abuse, especially among opiate abusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the available literature suggests an important clinical abuse potential of pregabalin and prescribers should pay attention to signs of abuse, especially in patients with a history of substance abuse.