Duloxetine in elderly major depression disorder: effectiveness and drug plasma level evaluation

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in osteoarthritis or chronic low back pain: a Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or chronic low back pain (CLBP).

METHODS

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Included RCTs compared the efficacy and safety of duloxetine vs placebo in the treatment of OA or CLBP. Weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated for continuous outcomes while risk ratio (RR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were included in our meta-analysis. Duloxetine had significant improvement over placebo in Brief Pain Inventory 24-h average pain [WMD: -0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.80, -0.53], weekly mean of the 24-h average pain (WMD: -0.65; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.52), Patient's Global Impression of Improvement (WMD: -0.41; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.32), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (WMD: -0.32; 95% CI: -0.38, -0.25), European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (WMD: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.07). In addition, duloxetine is associated with more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.33) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs) (RR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.81, 2.94). However, there was no statistically significant difference in serious AEs between duloxetine and placebo.

CONCLUSION

Duloxetine had modest to moderate effects on pain relief, function improvement, mood regulation and improvement in quality of life with mild AEs in the treatment of OA or CLBP. Future RCTs should focus on comparing duloxetine with other oral drugs and assessing the long-term safety of duloxetine.

Duloxetine plasma level and antidepressant response

BACKGROUND

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is associated with a high rate of inadequate treatment response, which is mainly due to the large inter-individual genetic variability in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets of antidepressant drugs. Little is still known about the exact association between plasma level of first-line antidepressants and clinical response. This is particularly true for duloxetine, a dual serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor recommended as first-line treatment for MDD. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between serum concentration of duloxetine (SCD) and antidepressant response (AR).

METHODS

66 MDD patients treated with duloxetine 60 mg/day monotherapy were recruited in an outpatient setting and followed for three months. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 21 (HAMD-21) was administrated at baseline, at month 1, and at month 3 to assess AR. SCD was measured at steady state. Linear regression analysis and nonlinear least-squares regression were used to estimate association between SCD and AR.

RESULTS

SCD showed a high inter-individual variability in our sample, despite the duloxetine fixed oral dosage. We found a strong association between SCD and AR following a bell-shaped function at month 1 and at month 3. Nonetheless, within the recommended SCD range of 30-120 ng/mL a more linear correlation between SCD and AR was observed.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that for duloxetine the association between SCD and AR likely follows a bell-shaped quadratic function with poor AR at subtherapeutic SCD and progressive decrease of AR at higher SCD. The maximum antidepressant efficacy seems to require SCD values next to the highest recommended SCD (30-120 ng/mL), probably because of the optimal saturation of both serotonin and norepinephrine transporters. Thus, taking into account the observed high interindividual variability of SCD, our findings suggest that for MDD patients treated with duloxetine, SCD could be a useful tool to guide the treatment by optimizing the oral dosage in order to increase the AR rate.