Rituximab-associated colitis

Key characteristics of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and clinical implications for multiple sclerosis treatment

The recent success of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has highlighted the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS. In people with MS, the inflammatory characteristics of B-cell activity are elevated, leading to increased pro-inflammatory cytokine release, diminished anti-inflammatory cytokine production and an accumulation of pathogenic B cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab and BCD-132 are anti-CD20 therapies that are either undergoing clinical development, or have been approved, for the treatment of MS. Despite CD20 being a common target for these therapies, differences have been reported in their mechanistic, pharmacological and clinical characteristics, which may have substantial clinical implications. This narrative review explores key characteristics of these therapies. By using clinical trial data and real-world evidence, we discuss their mechanisms of action, routes of administration, efficacy (in relation to B-cell kinetics), safety, tolerability and convenience of use. Clinicians, alongside patients and their families, should consider the aspects discussed in this review as part of shared decision-making discussions to improve outcomes and health-related quality of life for people living with MS.

Histologic manifestations of ocrelizumab-associated intestinal and hepatic injury in patients with multiple sclerosis

AIMS

Ocrelizumab is a humanized anti-CD20-monoclonal antibody that has recently been approved for the treatment of certain types of multiple sclerosis. Isolated case reports of ocrelizumab-associated colitis have been reported in the literature. We present a case series of ocrelizumab-associated intestinal injury with a focus on histopathologic features and report a case of ocrelizumab-associated hepatitis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective computerized search was conducted from 03/2017 to 08/2022, which identified six patients with suspected or clinically confirmed ocrelizumab-associated intestinal injury and one patient with hepatic injury. Pertinent clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings were reviewed and recorded. Seven patients (six female, one male) were identified with ages ranging from 24 to 68 years. The presenting symptoms included diarrhoea (n = 5), abdominal pain (n = 3), hematochezia (n = 2), and vomiting (n = 1), nausea (n = 1) fever (n = 1), and weight loss (n = 1). Endoscopic findings ranged from normal (n = 1) to patchy colonic inflammation with or without ulceration (n = 4) and decreased mucosal vascular pattern in the rectum (n = 1). Crohn's disease was clinically suspected in two patients and ulcerative colitis in one patient. None of the patients had a prior confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Histologic patterns of initial colonic injury included acute colitis/proctitis (n = 5), and chronic active colitis (n = 1). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 3 years and 10 months. All patients were alive at follow-up. Follow-up biopsies were available for four patients and findings included focal acute colitis (n = 1), apoptotic colopathy (n = 1) lymphocytic colitis (n = 1), and normal mucosa (n = 1). Four patients were treated with steroids and ocrelizumab was discontinued in three patients. Two patients were symptomatically managed with subsequent resolution of symptoms. The liver biopsy from the patient with a marked hepatic pattern of liver enzyme elevation showed an acute hepatitis pattern of injury with prominent centrilobular necrosis, which resolved upon discontinuation of the drug and treatment with steroids and azathioprine.

CONCLUSIONS

The histologic manifestations of ocrelizumab-associated intestinal injury are variable and can mimic inflammatory bowel disease. Hepatic injury can rarely manifest as an acute hepatitis pattern of injury with necrosis. Identifying ocrelizumab-associated injury is paramount in determining management, which often includes discontinuation of ocrelizumab therapy, and/or administration of immunosuppressive therapy.

Infliximab rescue therapy in a case of severe granulomatous colitis associated with rituximab use

Colitis occurs in about 4% of individuals treated with rituximab. Optimal management of rituximab-induced colitis, which does not improve with cessation of the drug and supportive care alone, is poorly defined due to limited evidence. Severe refractory disease can lead to colectomy. We present a case of suspected rituximab-induced colitis occurring in a woman in her 70s suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. The patient achieved full clinical, endoscopic and histological remission of colitis with infliximab therapy. The use of biological therapy to treat rituximab-induced colitis can be a potentially organ-saving rescue therapy; however, it must be balanced against the increased risks of immunosuppression in patients already exposed to rituximab. While more evidence is required to fully understand the efficacy and risks of antitumour necrosis factor therapy in this scenario, our case provides an example of the successful use of infliximab for rituximab-induced colitis, which likely helped the patient avoid a colectomy.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy and colitis: A case series and review

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a warning regarding ocrelizumab due to reports of colitis among patients taking this medication. Since it is the only FDA-approved therapy for primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), further research on this adverse event is necessary, and healthcare professionals should be informed of potential treatment options. In this review, we summarize the available data on the incidence of inflammatory colitis associated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as ocrelizumab and rituximab, used in MS treatment. Although the exact pathophysiology of anti-CD20-induced colitis remains unknown, immunological dysregulation through treatment-mediated B-cell depletion has been proposed as a possible mechanism. Our study highlights the importance of clinicians being aware of this potential side effect, and patients taking these medications should be closely monitored for any new-onset gastrointestinal symptoms or diarrheal illness. Research indicates that prompt intervention with endoscopic examination and medical or surgical therapies can ensure timely and effective management, thus improving patient outcomes. However, large-scale studies are still needed to determine the associated risk factors and to establish definitive guidelines for the clinical evaluation of MS patients on anti-CD20 medications.

Gut inflammation induced by drugs: Can pathology help to differentiate from inflammatory bowel disease?

Drug‐induced mucosal injury (DIMI) in the gastrointestinal tract is important to recognise, partly because cessation of the culprit agent alone may result in resolution of symptoms. An ever‐growing list of medications, including newer immunotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies, can cause gastrointestinal inflammation of varying severity. However, the diagnosis of DIMI is challenging, as a single drug can induce a variety of histopathological patterns of injury including acute colitis, chronic colitis, microscopic colitis, apoptotic colopathy, and ischaemic‐type colitis. An additional consideration is the potential clinical, endoscopic and histological overlap of DIMI with gastrointestinal mucosal injury secondary to other entities such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We discuss DIMI of the gastrointestinal tract with an emphasis on histological patterns that mimic IBD, histological features which may distinguish the two entities, and the diagnostic role and limitations of the pathologist.

Therapeutic agents affecting the immune system and drug-induced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): A review on etiological and pathogenetic aspects

In recent years, therapeutic agents affecting the immune system have been largely implemented in the treatment of various hematological, rheumatological and dermatological disorders. Their clinical use has offered important benefits for affected patients and has also ameliorated clinical outcome and prognosis in many cases. Nonetheless, as any treatment, the use of these drugs may be associated with side effects. One of the target organs in such cases is the gastrointestinal tract. In particular, the exacerbation or the onset of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in treated patients is not infrequent, although the mechanism of action of these agents may be different. In this review we will focus on the use of therapeutic agents affecting the immune system and the development or exacerbation of IBD, with a mention on the possible underlying pathogenetic mechanisms.

Increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease among patients treated with rituximab in Iceland from 2001 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

Immune-mediated diseases are on the rise after the introduction of powerful immunomodulating drugs. The objective of this study was to determine the population-based incidence rate of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among patients treated with the monoclonal antibody rituximab in Iceland and compare it to the baseline incidence rate of IBD in the general population.

METHODS

We identified all patients treated with rituximab in Iceland from 2001 to 2018 through a central medicine database. IBD cases were indexed from medical records and ICD-10 codes and further confirmed by colonoscopy- and pathology reports. An experienced pathologist compared the pathology of IBD cases with matched controls of IBD patients.

RESULTS

Lymphomas and related neoplasms were the most frequent indication for treatment with rituximab (n = 367) among the 651 patients included in the analysis. Following treatment, seven patients developed IBD: two cases of Crohn's disease, three with ulcerative colitis, and two with indeterminate IBD. The incidence rate of IBD among rituximab treated patients was 202 cases per 100,000 person-years. Comparing our data to IBD incidence in Iceland, rituximab treated patients have an age-adjusted hazard ratio of 6.6 for developing IBD. The risk did not correlate with dose or treatment duration. Prior diagnosis of an autoimmune illness did not increase the risk of IBD in rituximab treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on rituximab have a sixfold increased risk of developing IBD compared to the general population. This risk was not affected by the indication for treatment and was not associated with concurrent immune-mediated diseases. Summary This population-based retrospective cohort study included all patients receiving treatment with rituximab between 2001 and 2018 in Iceland and identified a sixfold increased risk of developing IBD when compared to the general population.

Clinical Features of Rituximab-associated Gastrointestinal Toxicities

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is effective in treating several cancers. Little is known about gastrointestinal adverse events associated with rituximab. We describe the clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features of rituximab-associated colitis (RC) at a tertiary care cancer center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of cancer patients who had received rituximab and had undergone a colonoscopy between 2000 and 2018. Patients with competing etiologies for colitis were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 13,717 patients who had received rituximab during the study period, 1660 had undergone colonoscopy. Among them, 70 (4%) had RC. Median time from rituximab treatment to RC onset was 181 days. Fifty-three patients had clinical gastrointestinal symptoms: 39 had diarrhea, 19 had abdominal pain, 11 had blood per rectum, and 5 had a concurrent fever. The median duration of symptoms was 21 days. Fifty patients (71%) received treatment for RC: immunosuppressive therapy in 12, antimicrobial agents in 21, antimotility agents in 42, and supportive care in 42. Nine patients had mucosal ulceration on endoscopy, and 52 had features of active inflammation on histology. Thirty-nine patients needed hospital admission, and 2 needed intensive care unit admission. One patient had colonic perforation that required surgical intervention. Patients who had abnormal endoscopic findings needed more frequent hospitalization (P=0.024) and more treatment for RC (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RC is usually a mild disease requiring supportive care only. Nonetheless, on rare occasions, it can be severe enough to lead to colonic perforation and intensive care unit admission. Steroids used with the chemotherapeutic regimen can hamper RC severity.

De Novo Colitis Associated With Rituximab in 21 Patients at a Tertiary Center

Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen on B lymphocytes, is commonly used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies and rheumatologic disorders.^1,2 It acts to rapidly deplete the B lymphocyte population through multiple mechanisms, leading to dysregulation of the immune system.³ Rituximab has been associated with numerous adverse gastrointestinal effects including diarrhea and bowel perforation, and recent reports have associated rituximab with the development of de novo inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).^4,5 To our knowledge, there have been no reports of microscopic colitis (MC) associated with rituximab therapy. We aimed to identify patients with rituximab-associated colitis, and to better characterize the clinical features and disease course of these patients.

A comprehensive review of rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Rituximab (RTX) is an approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients that do not respond adequately to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. However, different new concerns, such as efficacy, optimum dose, safety issues, prediction of response to RTX, and pregnancy outcomes have attracted a lot of attention. The PubMed database was systematically reviewed for the last published articles, new findings, and controversial issues regarding RTX therapy in RA using "Rheumatoid arthritis" AND "rituximab" keywords, last updated on June 18, 2019. From 1812 initial recorders, 162 studies met the criteria. Regarding the optimum dose, low-dose RTX therapy (2 × 500 mg) seems as effective as standard dose (2 × 1000 mg), safer, and more cost-effective. The most common reported safety challenges included de novo infections, false negative serologic tests of viral infections, reactivation of chronic infections, interfering with vaccination outcome, and development of de novo psoriasis. Other less reported side effects are infusion reactions, nervous system disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders. Lower exposure to other biologics, presence of some serological markers (e.g., anti-RF, anti-CCP, IL-33, ESR), specific variations in FCGR3A, FCGR2A, TGFβ1, IL6, IRF5, BAFF genes, and also EBV-positivity could be used to predict response to RTX. Although there is no evidence of the teratogenic effect of RTX, it is recommended that women do not expose themselves to RTX at least 6 months before the conception. Only a reversible reduction of B cell-count in the offspring may be the pregnancy-related outcome. Although RTX is an effective therapeutic option for RA, more studies on optimum doses, prevention of RTX-related side effects, prediction of RTX response, and safety during the pregnancy are required.

Anti-Inflammatory Biologics and Anti-Tumoral Immune Therapies-Associated Colitis: A Focused Review of Literature

An increasing number of drugs including monoclonal antibodies and small molecules, either anti-inflammatory or immunity-enhancing, have been developed to treat human diseases and the number of medications in these classes is likely to expand in the future. The two most commonly used categories of such therapies are the anti-inflammatory group (anti- tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, anti-interleukins/interleukin receptors, and anti-integrin bodies) and the anti-tumoral agents (immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-CD20, and anti-endothelial growth factor). Although the anti-inflammatory biologics have brought about a revolutionary effect in the management of a variety of autoimmune disorders including rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, and inflammatory dermatological diseases, their ability to induce colitis in patients without a prior history of colitis or exacerbate quiescent colitis has been increasingly and unexpectedly recognized. While the use of immune-augmenting monoclonal antibody therapies results in a significant survival benefit in a subset of patients with malignancies, these monoclonal antibodies also have the ability to cause colitis through an apparent autoimmune mechanism. Colitis associated with these medications may demonstrate multiple histologic patterns including increased apoptosis (graft versus host disease (GVHD)-like), autoimmune enteropathy pattern, acute colitis pattern, ischemic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease pattern, either ulcerative colitis-like, Crohn’s disease-like, or fulminant colitis-like. In addition, anti-inflammatory biologics are known to cause or reactivate latent infections such as tuberculosis and increase the risk for malignancies including high-grade lymphomas as well as indolent lymphoproliferative disorders. Thus, the differential diagnosis for colitis in patients receiving therapeutic anti-inflammatory biologics or anti-tumoral agents can be broad. Optimal diagnosis and treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. This review aims to provide an overview of the literature on the clinical features, histology, and treatment of these newly recognized anti-inflammatory biologic and anti-tumoral immune therapy-induced colitises and hopes this outlines will raise the vigilance of all clinicians of these entities.

A presentation of ulcerative colitis after rituximab therapy in a patient with multiple sclerosis and literature review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most important demyelinating diseases that affects the central nervous system. Its treatment often involves a long-term disease modifying therapy. According to some studies, the prevalence of autoimmune disorders, such as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is higher in MS patients than in the normal population. There are also few studies that have reported the onset of UC after rituximab therapy. The present study presents a report of a 31-years old female patient suffering from aggressive multiple sclerosis, which developed into autoimmune hepatitis during the MS therapy. Thereafter, she received rituximab for the treating both MS and AIH. One week after the third cycle of rituximab (6 doses of 1000 mg), she experienced abdominal pain, fever, and severe bloody diarrhea; finally, she was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC). It seems that the administration of certain immunomodulators or immunosuppressive drugs may have a main role in the exacerbation of some autoimmune diseases.

Efficient long-term depletion of CD20+ B cells by rituximab does not affect gut-resident plasma cells

The vast majority of antibody-producing B cells are located within the gastrointestinal tract and are key players in maintaining homeostasis. The failure of rituximab, a potent B cell-depleting agent, to ameliorate ulcerative colitis in a single clinical trial has dampened enthusiasm to study B cells in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, several lines of evidence suggest that intestinal B cells may be affected in IBD. Additionally, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying rituximab's lack of efficacy in IBD remain unclear. Here, on the basis of detailed immunophenotyping of a patient who underwent a colonoscopy 6 months after the end of rituximab-based therapy, we observed that rituximab did not deplete colon-resident plasma cells (PCs) while ablating all CD20⁺ B cells in tissues and in the circulation. On the basis of these observations, we propose that one factor underlying the lack of efficacy of rituximab relates to the fact that it does not affect the entire B cell compartment in tissues, sparing the intestinal-resident PCs while effectively depleting CD20⁺ B cell populations. Thus, we contend that, despite the results of the Rituximab study, there is a need for more intensive B cell-oriented research in inflammatory disorders, including IBD.

Rituximab-induced Crohn's disease

The use of rituximab has significantly improved outcomes in patients with haematological malignancies and autoimmune disease. There are reports of rituximab-associated ulcerative colitis; however, we report for the first time, two cases of rituximab-induced Crohn's disease in elderly patients treated for lymphoma. Both patients had evidence of inflammation, ulceration, and granulomas consistent with Crohn's disease, and responded well to immunosuppression. The association of rituximab and ileocolitis suggests a protective effect of CD20 + lymphocytes in the gut, and implicates their depletion to the development and exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease.

Regulatory B cells in human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases: from mouse models to clinical research

B cells have been generally considered to be positive regulators of immune responses because of their ability to produce antigen-specific antibodies and to activate T cells through antigen presentation. Impairment of B cell development and function may cause inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Recently, specific B cell subsets that can negatively regulate immune responses have been described in mouse models of a wide variety of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The concept of those B cells, termed regulatory B cells, is now recognized as important in the murine immune system. Among several regulatory B cell subsets, IL-10-producing regulatory B cells are the most widely investigated. On the basis of discoveries from studies of such mice, human regulatory B cells that produce IL-10 in most cases are becoming an active area of research. There have been emerging data suggesting the importance of human regulatory B cells in various diseases. Revealing the immune regulation mechanisms of human regulatory B cells in human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases could lead to the development of novel B cell targeted therapies. This review highlights the current knowledge on regulatory B cells, mainly IL-10-producing regulatory B cells, in animal models of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and in clinical research using human samples.

Inflammatory bowel diseases: Current problems and future tasks

Current knowledge on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is mainly endorsed by controlled trials and epidemiologic studies. Yet, we seldom look at the messages from real-world practice. Among a patient population followed since 2008, we looked at an unselected sample of 64 IBD patients [26 Crohn’s disease (CD) and 38 ulcerative colitis (UC)] who had been seen as out-patients in the last year. Inducing remission, mesalamines (86% for UC/69% for CD/33%-16% as MMX formulation) prevailed as prescriptions; steroids (55%/19% for UC/CD) ranked second. Prescription of third-party drugs (antibiotics, NSAIDs, biologics) and adherence, were issues in the maintenance. 34% of CD, and 23% of UC patients showed accompanying immunologic diseases: CD-associated familiar psoriasis (4:9) ranked first. Main Message. The association between IBD (CD mainly) and psoriasis, now found in our practice, matches current basic science gathering IBD together with psoriasis (and perhaps chronic respiratory disease) under the comprehensive term “barrier organ disease” wherein an epithelial surface with sensor systems rules contacts between outer antigens and a reactive underneath tissue, with the balance between inflammation and quiescence kept at any time by mucosal permeability. IBD is thus viewed as a polyfactorial/polygenic/syndromic disorder, embedded into a galaxy of immune conditions offering multiple points of attack. This mindset of splitting the IBDs into pathogenic categories may allow overcoming the uniformly targeting of a single cytokine by biological drugs, in favor of demarcating the boundaries between different disease-subtype-specific indications, and paving the way to future personalized strategies.

Regulatory B cells in mouse models of intestinal inflammation

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic intestinal inflammatory condition with increasing incidence and prevalence around the world. Although B cells had generally been believed to play a pathogenic role in IBD due to the production of autoantibodies, a growing body of evidence from mouse models suggests the coexistence of pathogenic B cells and regulatory B cells, termed Breg, in this disorder. Since some unique techniques are required to closely study the Breg in gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT), we herein describe how to induce colitis in mice and how to analyze the phenotype and function of GALT-specific Breg.