Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective analysis

Safety and Efficacy of the Combination Lurbinectedin plus Doxorubicin from a Phase 1b Trial in Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE

While cytotoxic chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), clinical outcomes remain suboptimal. Our prior study showed lurbinectedin plus doxorubicin is well tolerated with promising clinical activity in STS. We designed this phase 1b trial to optimize dosing as the basis for a randomized trial in leiomyosarcoma and to further explore the safety profile and efficacy signal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had advanced/metastatic STS and no prior anthracycline/lurbinectedin/trabectedin. Escalation followed a 3 + 3 design with 3-week cycles: lurbinectedin (3.2 mg/m2 day 1) and two doxorubicin levels (DL1, 25 mg/m2 day 1; DL2, 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8). The primary objectives were to identify the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for subsequent randomized trials.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled in a 6-month period. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were grade (G) 2 fatigue and nausea, and G2 cytopenias with no febrile neutropenia events. There were two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at DL2 [day 8 (G2 alanine aminotransferase [ALT]/aspartate aminotransferase increase, G3 neutropenia)], and one DLT in DL1 (G3 ALT increase). These were reversible and all patients continued the study. DL1 was chosen for further study. At the time of data cutoff, the estimated median progression-free survival is 16.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.0-ND]. The objective response rate was 60% (6/10 confirmed partial responses).

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase 1b study, the recommended dose is lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 in combination with doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The study combination was well tolerated and demonstrated intriguing clinical activity.

Efficacies of anlotinib monotherapy versus gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor efficacy of anlotinib with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as subsequent treatment regimens in patients with advanced non-specific soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with advanced STS who were treated with either anlotinib or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy between May 2009 and May 2023 in our center were eligible. All patients experienced disease progression or recurrence after the anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

We included 49 patients receiving anlotinib and 45 patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 76.9 weeks (range 2.9-678.9 weeks). The DCR (65.3% vs. 57.8%; p = 0.610), PFS (24.0 weeks vs. 18.6 weeks; p = 0.669) and OS (79.4 weeks vs. 87.0 weeks; p = 0.471) of anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy indicated similar clinical efficacy. Moreover, exploratory subgroup analyses showed that patients with STS originating from limbs and trunk were inclined to benefit from anlotinib treatment (median PFS: 31.3 weeks vs. 12.4 weeks; p = 0.045). ECOG PS was an independent predictor of the PFS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.85; p = 0.023] and OS (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.10-0.70; p = 0.008) in the anlotinib group. While neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent prognostic factor of the PFS (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.045) in the gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group. The incidence of grade 3 or higher related AEs in anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 20.4% (n = 10) and 20.0% (n = 9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our research suggested that anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy showed similar clinical efficacy and safety in the subsequent treatment of advanced STS after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Integrated budget impact model to estimate the impact of introducing selpercatinib as a tumor-agnostic treatment option for patients with RET-altered solid tumors in the US

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the potential budget impact on US third party payers (commercial or Medicare) associated with addition of selpercatinib as a tumor-agnostic treatment for patients with Rearranged during Transfection (RET)-altered solid tumors.

METHODS

An integrated budget impact model (iBIM) with 3-year (Y) time horizon was developed for 19 RET-altered tumors. It is referred to as an integrated model because it is a single model that integrated results across multiple tumor types (as opposed to tumor-specific models developed traditionally). The model estimated eligible patient populations and included tumor-specific comparator treatments for each tumor type. Estimated annual total costs (2022USD, $) included costs of drug, administration, supportive care, and toxicity. For a one-million-member plan, the number of patients with RET-altered tumors eligible for treatment, incremental total costs, and incremental per-member per-month (PMPM) costs associated with introduction of selpercatinib treatment were estimated. Uncertainty associated with model parameters was assessed using various sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Commercial perspective estimated 11.68 patients/million with RET-altered tumors as treatment-eligible annually, of which 7.59 (Y1), 8.17 (Y2), and 8.76 (Y3) patients would be selpercatinib-treated (based on forecasted market share). The associated incremental total and PMPM costs (commercial) were estimated to be: $873,099 and $0.073 (Y1), $2,160,525 and $0.180 (Y2), and $2,561,281 and $0.213 (Y3), respectively. The Medicare perspective estimated 55.82 patients/million with RET-altered tumors as treatment-eligible annually, of which 36.29 (Y1), 39.08 (Y2), and 41.87 (Y3) patients would be selpercatinib-treated. The associated incremental total and PMPM costs (Medicare) were estimated to be: $4,447,832 and $0.371 (Y1), $11,076,422 and $0.923 (Y2), and $12,637,458 and $1.053 (Y3), respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses across both perspectives identified drug costs, selpercatinib market share, incidence of RET, and treatment duration as significant drivers of incremental costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-year incremental PMPM cost estimates suggest a modest impact on payer-budgets associated with introduction of tumor-agnostic selpercatinib treatment.

Chemotherapeutic drugs for soft tissue sarcomas: a review

Despite the low incidence of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), hundreds of thousands of new STS cases are diagnosed annually worldwide, and approximately half of them eventually progress to advanced stages. Currently, chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for advanced STSs. There are difficulties in selecting appropriate drugs for multiline chemotherapy, or for combination treatment of different STS histological subtypes. In this study, we first comprehensively reviewed the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of STSs, and then described the current status of sensitive drugs for different STS subtypes. anthracyclines are the most important systemic treatment for advanced STSs. Ifosfamide, trabectedin, gemcitabine, taxanes, dacarbazine, and eribulin exhibit certain activities in STSs. Vinca alkaloid agents (vindesine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, vincristine) have important therapeutic effects in specific STS subtypes, such as rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma family tumors, whereas their activity in other subtypes is weak. Other chemotherapeutic drugs (methotrexate, cisplatin, etoposide, pemetrexed) have weak efficacy in STSs and are rarely used. It is necessary to select specific second- or above-line chemotherapeutic drugs depending on the histological subtype. This review aims to provide a reference for the selection of chemotherapeutic drugs for multi-line therapy for patients with advanced STSs who have an increasingly long survival.

Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare gemcitabine (G) plus docetaxel (D) versus G plus anlotinib (A) for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 122 patients with locally advanced or metastatic STS who were treated with either G+D or G+A between July 2016 and October 2021 and compared the efficacy and toxicity of G+D and G+A. The primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (PFS) and the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events. We also analyzed differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A in leiomyosarcoma, and the differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A as first-line therapy.

Results

Overall, 122 patients were included (81 patients receiving G+D and 41 patients receiving G+A) with a median age of 55 years. The main histological types are leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and liposarcoma. After a median follow-up of 25 months, PFS did not differ between patients treated with G+D and those treated with G+A (median PFS: 5.8 months and 6.8 months, p = 0.39), and overall survival (OS) was similar (median OS: 14.7 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.75) with a similar objective response rate (18.5% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.17), whereas the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events treated with G+D was significantly higher than those treated with G+A (68% vs. 44%, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of leiomyosarcoma patients (47.5% of the patients) and first-line treatment patients (46.7% of the patients) shows that PFS was not significantly different between the two groups (LMS: median PFS: 6.5 months vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.08; first-line treatment: median PFS: 6.2 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.51).

Conclusion

Compared with gemcitabine plus docetaxel for advanced STS, gemcitabine plus anlotinib achieved a similar response rate on median PFS and OS, but lower toxicity. These results suggest that gemcitabine plus anlotinib may be an effective and safe strategy for advanced STS.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, outlines treatment recommendations, and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.

Establishment and characterization of two novel patient-derived myxoid liposarcoma cell lines

Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) is a lipogenic sarcoma, characterized by myxoid appearance histology and the presence of the FUS-DDIT3 fusion gene. MLPS shows frequent recurrence and poor prognosis after standard treatments, such as surgery. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches for MLPS are needed. Development of novel treatments requires patient-derived cell lines to study the drug responses and their molecular backgrounds. Presently, only three cell lines of MLPS have been reported, and no line is available from public cell banks. Thus, this study aimed to establish and characterize novel MLPS cell lines. Using surgically resected tumor tissue from two patients with MLPS, two novel lines NCC-MLPS2-C1 and NCC-MLPS3-C1 were established. The presence of FUS-DDIT3 fusion, slow growth, spheroid formation, and invasive capability in these cell lines was confirmed. Growth retardation was monitored for 213 anti-cancer agents using NCC-MLPS2-C1 and NCC-MLPS3-C1 cells, and the results were integrated with the response to treatments in an MLPS cell line, NCC-MLPS1-C1, which was previously established in our laboratory. We found that romidepsin suppressed cell proliferation at considerably low concentrations in all three examined cell lines. NCC-MLPS2-C1 and NCC-MLPS3-C1 cell lines developed here represent a useful tool for basic and preclinical studies of MLPS.

Gemcitabine Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Metastasized Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Background

Metastasized soft-tissue sarcomas still pose a significant therapeutic challenge given the limited efficacy of currently available multimodal treatment strategies. Recent progress in molecular characterization of sarcoma subtypes has enabled successful personalized therapy approaches in a minority of selected patients with targetable mutations. However, in the majority of patients with refractory soft tissue sarcomas, long-term survival remains poor.

Methods

We report on three adult patients with various soft tissue sarcomas subjected to Gemcitabine maintenance therapy. Tumor entities included leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas (patient 1), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the right femur (patient 2), and peri-aortic leiomyosarcoma (patient 3). Metastatic sites encompassed liver, lung, and bones. All patients received Gemcitabine maintenance therapy until disease progression following prior salvage chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Gemcitabine. Patients were treated outside of clinical trials. Response assessment was based on radiological imaging.

Results

In response to salvage chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Gemcitabine, one patient exhibited a partial remission, and two patients showed stable disease. Patient 1 exhibited stable disease for 6 months during Gemcitabine maintenance therapy before suffering rapid progression of hepatic metastases. Patient 2 underwent 21 months of Gemcitabine maintenance therapy, which was discontinued after progressive pulmonary metastases were detected. Patient 3 is still being treated with Gemcitabine maintenance therapy. Remarkably, owing to significant chemotherapy-associated hematotoxicity, the dose of Gemcitabine dose was reduced by two-thirds. Nevertheless, stable disease with constant pulmonary metastases has been maintained in this patient for 14 months.

Conclusions

Gemcitabine maintenance therapy following prior Docetaxel and Gemcitabine chemotherapy is manageable and reveals potential benefits for patients with aggressive metastasized soft tissue sarcomas. Prospective trials evaluating Gemcitabine maintenance therapy are encouraged.

Surgical resection of leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: A case series and literature review

OBJECTIVES

We review our institution's experience in treating leiomyosarcomas involving the inferior vena cava, and we offer guidance on the management.

METHODS

A text-based search was performed to identify all patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2002 and October 2020. Clinicopathologic data, intraoperative variables, and outcomes were extracted from chart review.

RESULTS

Twelve of 16 patients (75%) had localized disease; the remaining had limited metastatic disease. Seven of 16 patients (44%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation; three patients had partial responses, and four patients had stable disease using RECIST 1.1 criteria. IVC reconstruction was performed in 14 of 16 patients (88%); IVC was ligated for the remaining two patients. Half of all patients had R0 resection on final pathology; the remaining had R1 resections. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not statistically different between patients with R0 and R1 resection. Median PFS was 1.8 years (95% CI 0.89 - not reached); median OS was 6.5 years (1.8 - not reached). Only one patient (6%) experienced local disease recurrence; 4 of 16 patients (25%) experienced disease recurrence distally without local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of IVC leiomyosarcomas at a sarcoma referral center with experience in vascular reconstruction can lead to many years of recurrence-free survival. Surgical resection should be offered to patients with a low volume of metastatic disease to reduce local complications from the primary tumor, many of which exert significant mass effect on surrounding organs. For patients with metastatic disease or large, high-risk tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can provide a biologic test of disease stability prior to resection.

Fourteen-Day Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Chemotherapy Is Effective and Safer Compared to 21-Day Regimen in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma

Simple Summary

Gemcitabine-docetaxel chemotherapy is an important regimen for the treatment of soft tissue and bone sarcomas. We aimed to determine if gemcitabine-docetaxel when administered every 14-day would be as effective and less toxic compared to the 21-day schedule. Our study shows that indeed when administered in 14-day schedule gemcitabine-docetaxel chemotherapy results in similar chance of tumor shrinkage and survival yet fewer febrile neutropenia and discontinuation of chemotherapy due to intolerance, compared to 21-day schedule. Therefore, 14-day gemcitabine-docetaxel chemotherapy is safer and can be broadly adopted for the treatment of advanced soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

Abstract

Gemcitabine-docetaxel (G-D) combination is an effective chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma, first developed with G administered on days 1 and 8, and D on day 8 every 21 days and later modified to be administered every 14 days in 2012. The 14-day regimen has become increasingly adopted. However, its efficacy and toxicities have not been compared. We identified 161 patients with metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma treated with either a 14-day or 21-day regimen within Northern California Kaiser Permanente from 1 January 2017 to 30 July 2020 and compared the outcomes and toxicity profiles of patients treated with the either regimen. Seventy-nine (49%) and 82 (51%) patients received the 14-day and the 21-day regimen, respectively, with similar response rate (22.8% and 15.8%, p = 0.26), median progression-free survival (PFS, 4.0 and 3.2 months, p = 0.15), and median overall survival (OS, 12.6 and 14.7 months, p = 0.55). Subset analysis of the untreated patients (approximately 60% of the entire cohort) as well as the patients with leiomyosarcoma only (approximately 50% of the entire cohort) showed that OS was not significantly different between the two regimens. Febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred in 10 and one patients (p = 0.006) and intolerance leading to discontinuation of chemotherapy occurred in 12 and two patients (p = 0.006) treated with the 21-day and the 14-day regimens, respectively. CDKN2A deletion/mutation or CDK4 amplification was associated with worse median OS (p = 0.06), while a RB1 deletion/mutation was associated with better median PFS (p = 0.05), and these two genomic alterations were mutually exclusive. Our data demonstrate that, compared to the traditional 21-day G-D regimen, the 14-day G-D regimen is equally effective but safer. In addition, CDKN2A and RB1 pathways play significant role on the outcomes of the patients.

Eribulin Regresses a Doxorubicin-resistant Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma in a Patient-derived Orthotopic Xenograft Mouse Model

BACKGROUND/AIM

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is recalcitrant type of sarcoma. DDLPS has a low survival rate with high recurrence and metastasis. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of several drugs against doxorubicin-resistant DDLPS in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model for precision oncology. To establish the PDOX model, a tumor from a patient who had recurrent high-grade DDLPS from the retroperitoneum was previously grown orthotopically in the retroperitoneum of nude mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We randomized DDLPS PDOX models into 8 treatment groups when tumor volume became approximately 100 mm³: control, no treatment; G2, doxorubicin (DOX); G3, pazopanib (PAZ); G4, gemcitabine (GEM) combined with docetaxel (DOC); G5, trabectedin (YON); G6, temozolomide (TEM); G7, palbociclib (PAL); G8, eribulin (ERB). Tumor length and width were measured both at the beginning and at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment (day 14), all treatments significantly inhibited DDLPS PDOX tumor growth compared to the untreated control, except DOX. ERB was significantly more effective and regressed tumor volume compared to other treatments on day 14 after initiation of treatment. No significant differences were found in the relative body weight on day 14 compared to day 0 in any group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical potential of ERB against DDLPS is herein presented in a PDOX model.

Establishment and characterization of NCC-PLPS1-C1, a novel patient-derived cell line of pleomorphic liposarcoma

Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS) is a rare subtype of liposarcoma, characterized by the presence of pleomorphic lipoblasts without definitive molecular aberrations; it accounts for less than 5% of all liposarcomas. PLPS is an aggressive cancer that exhibits frequent local recurrence and metastasis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of ~ 60%. Owing to the lack of effective treatment options in inoperable conditions and resistance to chemotherapeutics, novel therapies are required to treat PLPS. Although patient-derived cell lines are a critical tool for basic and pre-clinical research, only one PLPS cell line is reportedly available for analysis. A paucity of adequate cell line hinders the progress of research and treatments of PLPS. Thus, we aimed to establish and characterize a novel patient-derived cell line for PLPS. Using surgically resected tumor tissue from a 71-year-old male patient, we established the NCC-PLPS1-C1 cell line. The cells were maintained for more than 8 months and passaged ~ 40 times in the tissue culture condition. NCC-PLPS1-C1 cells were characterized by multiple genetic deletions and showed rapid growth, spheroid formation, and invasive potential. The NCC-PLPS1-C1 cells and the original tumor tissue shared similar kinase activity profiles for FES and PDGFR-β. NCC-PLPS1-C1 constantly proliferated, being suitable for the screening of anti-cancer drugs. A screen for the anti-proliferative effects of anti-cancer drugs on NCC-PLPS1-C1 cells showed a significant response for bortezomib, gemcitabine, romidepsin, topotecan, and vinblastine. In conclusion, NCC-PLPS1-C1 cells represent a useful tool for basic and pre-clinical studies related to PLPS, especially high-throughput drug screening.

Successful treatment of advanced pancreatic leiomyosarcoma treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: a case report and literature review

Pancreatic leiomyosarcoma (PLMS) is an extremely rare tumor that accounts for 0.1% of pancreatic malignancies, and its chemotherapy has yet to be established. Generally, soft-tissue sarcoma chemotherapy is standard treatment with doxorubicin (DXR) alone. However, the effectiveness of gemcitabine (GEM) plus docetaxel (DOC) has been shown in uterine leiomyoma. In contrast, the GEM plus nab-paclitaxel (PTX) regimen has been established as first-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. For this study, we selected the GEM plus nab-PTX regimen for patients with PLMS, achieving success in approximately 10 months. From a search on PubMed, we found only 12 cases of PLMS (including this case) that underwent chemotherapy. Our case is the first reported patient to have survived more than 2 years with chemotherapy alone. In a nude mouse model, the GEM plus DOC regimen was shown to significantly decrease tumor size when compared with DXR in leiomyosarcoma, and the GEM plus nab-PTX regimen was reported to significantly reduce necrosis when compared with DXR alone, GEM alone, DOC alone, nab-PTX alone and GEM plus DOC in soft-tissue sarcoma. GEM plus nab-PTX therapy might therefore be the first choice for soft-tissue sarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. This is the first reported case of PLMS treated with GEM plus nab-PTX.

Activity of PD1 inhibitor therapy in advanced sarcoma: a single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors with different clinical behaviors and variable responses to systemic therapies. Recent immunotherapy studies with PD1 inhibitors (PD1i) show promising results with use in certain soft-tissue sarcomas; however, the clinical and molecular features that best predict response to PD1i remain unclear.

METHODS

Demographic, imaging, histologic, and genetic sequencing data was collected for sarcoma patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab (PD1i) treatment at our institution between January 1st 2015 and April 23rd 2018. The primary objective was to determine progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced sarcomas receiving PD1i. Secondary objectives included determining overall survival (OS) and assessment of characteristics associated with response to PD1i. Fifty-six patients who were treated with PD1i therapy met inclusion criteria for this study.

RESULTS

Partial response towards PD1i treatment was seen in 3 in 26 evaluable patients, but no complete responses were observed (overall response rate 11.5%). Within this group of patients, the 90 day PFS was found to be 48.8%. In patients in whom PD1 expression was known, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between expression of PD1 and longer PFS and OS rates. Patients that were treated with more than four cycles of PD1i therapy were also more likely to have a greater OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests activity of PD1i in a pretreated cohort of advanced sarcoma patients, particularly for the subset of patients with PD1 positive tumors. Our results highlight the importance of further research to better target the optimal patient population and markers of response.

Administration sequence for multi-agent oncolytic regimens

Purpose

The existence of a multitude of oncolytics regimens containing two or more agents (combination) outlines the need to define their most adequate sequence of administration. However, limited resources are currently available to specify a particular sequence, presenting challenges potentially impacting on patient safety, and Pharmacy & Infusion Nursing workflows.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed leading to the compilation of a document containing drug administration sequencing instructions for our Nursing, Pharmacy, and Oncology providers to follow. Regimens prioritized in our literature review represented regimens selected as part of our approved Clinical Pathways, regimens inquiries from Pharmacy or Nursing, as well as less frequently used regimens. We stratified the regimens by tumor type and arranged them alphabetically by indication.

Results

A table was compiled containing all the supporting literature for the recommended drug administration sequences. If, in certain instances, no literature support was identified outlining rationale such as enhanced management of adverse effects, a specific institutional decision was made by our enterprise Medical Oncology Committee with recommendations from Pharmacy experts. The primary guiding principles for outlining our recommendations were the following: administration of vesicant agents first; administration of biologic agents first; administration of taxanes prior to platinum agents; and duration of infusion (shorter infusions prioritized).

Conclusion

This guideline is not exhaustive. The compilation provided here is intended to be utilized as guidance for oncolytics administration sequence. We will continue to review and incorporate treatment sequencing recommendations for additional regimens.

A phase II multi-strata study of lurbinectedin as a single agent or in combination with conventional chemotherapy in metastatic and/or unresectable sarcomas

Chemotherapy objective response rates (ORRs) in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are typically 20-40% with median progression-free survival (PFS) less than 6 months. Lurbinectedin is a new anticancer agent under investigation. The primary objective of this three-arm, phase II study was to determine the disease control rate (DCR = ORR + stable disease [SD]) at 24 weeks of lurbinectedin alone or with chemotherapy in STS. Eligible patients included adults with ≤2 prior cytotoxic therapies. Study cohorts were: stratum A (StrA; anthracycline-naive), lurbinectedin/doxorubicin; stratum B (StrB; prior anthracycline), lurbinectedin/gemcitabine; stratum C (StrC; prior anthracycline/gemcitabine) lurbinectedin monotherapy. Each stratum was analysed separately by Simon two-stage design. Forty-two patients were accrued (StrA = 20, StrB = 10, StrC = 12) including leiomyosarcoma [LMS] (n = 20), synovial sarcoma [SS](n = 4), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (n = 3) and other STS histologies (n = 15). For StrA there were seven partial responses (PR) plus one stable disease (SD) at 24 weeks. For StrB, two patients met the 24-week DCR including one PR (leiomyosarcoma) and one SD (desmoplastic small round cell tumour [DSRCT]). StrB did not continue to the second stage. In StrC, no patients met the primary end-point. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was: StrA = 4.2 months (90% CI 1.4-7.8), StrB = 1.7 months (90% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-7.4), and StrC = 1.3 months (90% CI 1.1-3.0). Lurbinectedin as a single agent or with chemotherapy was well tolerated with haematologic adverse events (AE's) as the most common toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of lurbinectedin/doxorubicin reached the DCR end-point with seven PR and one patient with SD (ORR 35.0%, 24-week DCR 40.0%). Evidence of drug benefit was seen in leiomyosarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), myxoid liposarcoma (MLS), synovial sarcoma (SS), and desmoplastic small round cell tumour (DSRCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02448537.

Efficacy and Safety of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension-Based Chemotherapy in Sarcoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip) based chemotherapy in patients with sarcoma.

Methods

In this retrospective, multicenter (6 centers), observational study, we analyzed the medical charts of adult patients of either sex, who were treated with NDLS (75 mg/m² in 3-weekly cycles) based chemotherapy for the treatment of sarcoma. The efficacy outcomes were overall response rate (ORR: complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) and disease control rate (DCR: CR + PR + stable disease (SD)) in patients who received NDLS-based chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated for all settings.

Results

Of 11 patients (neoadjuvant: 1, adjuvant: 3, and metastatic: 7) in this study, majority had leiomyosarcoma (63.6%, 7/11) followed by extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC), high grade pleomorphic sarcoma of mandible, malignant fibrous histiocytoma of right thigh, and osteosarcoma of femur (9.1% each, 1/11 each). NDLS plus gemcitabine combination was used in 10 patients (90.9%), and NDLS plus cyclophosphamide was used in one patient with EMC (9.1%). Efficacy evaluation was performed for 7 patients (neoadjuvant: 1/1; metastatic: 6/7). Complete response was reported in one patient (soft tissue sarcoma of mandible) treated in neoadjuvant setting. In metastatic setting, ORR was 50% and DCR was 66.7% (CR: 16.7% (1/6), PR: 33.3% (2/6), SD: 16.7% (1/6)). At a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range: 0.06–20.2 months), median OS was not reached in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, but it was 15.8 months in metastatic setting. At least 1 AE was reported in 7 (63.6%) patients. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and anemia were the hematological AEs, whereas nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were the most common nonhematological AEs. NDLS treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns.

Conclusion

Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of sarcoma. Further prospective trials are needed to confirm the data.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy for advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas: protocol for an open-label, non-randomised, Phase 2 study

Background

The prognosis of patients with metastatic or advanced sarcomas is poor and there are few options for treatment. Several studies have shown that gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) combination chemotherapy has antitumor activity against various subtypes of sarcoma. Recently, some studies have shown a favourable outcome for GD combination chemotherapy for relapsed high-grade osteosarcoma and spindle cell sarcoma of bone. If the effectiveness of GD is proven, this will result in new treatment options for advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The aim of this prospective Phase 2 study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the GD combination in patients with advanced bone sarcomas and STS.

Methods

This is a Phase 2, single-arm, open-label study to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with GD for advanced bone sarcomas and STS and will enrol 20 patients. The patients will receive gemcitabine 900 mg/m² on Days 1 and 8, and docetaxel 70 mg/m² on Day 8 in 3-week cycles until disease progression or other evidence of treatment failure. The primary aim of this study is to analyse GD’s effect on progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary objectives are to analyse treatment efficacy and safety in terms of response rate, tumour control rate, overall survival, and adverse event rate. The length of follow-up will be 5 years.

Discussion

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel for bone sarcomas and STS. If this combination proves to be acceptable, it could be used for as second, third, or later line therapy for patients with sarcomas (especially bone sarcomas). In the future, the role of various treatments, including GD therapy, will be clarified for specific subtypes of sarcoma.

Trial registration

This study was registered as UMIN000031004 (University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN-CTR) on 1 March 1 2018 and with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) as jRCTs051180042 on 30 January 2019. The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5923-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel arrests a doxorubicin-resistant dedifferentiated liposarcoma in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft model

Liposarcoma (LS) is a chemotherapy-resistant disease. The aim of the present study was to find precise therapy for a recurrent dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. The DDLS PDOX models were established orthotopically in the right inguinal area of nude mice. The DDLS PDOX models were randomized into five groups: untreated; doxorubicin (DOX); gemcitabine (GEM) combined with docetaxel (DOC); pazopanib (PAZ); and yondelis (YON). On day 15, all mice were sacrificed. Measurement of tumor volume and body weight were done two times a week. The DDLS PDOX was resistant to DOX (P > 0.184). YON suppressed tumor growth significantly compared to control group (P < 0.027). However, only GEM combined with DOC arrested the tumor growth (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that GEM combined with DOC has clinical potential for this and possibly other DDLS patients.

A Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Dacarbazine for Leiomyosarcoma, Synovial Sarcoma, and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib and dacarbazine have low single-agent response rates in metastatic sarcomas. As angiogenesis inhibitors can enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy, we investigated the combination of sorafenib and dacarbazine in select sarcoma subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), synovial sarcoma (SS), or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) with up to two previous lines of therapy and adequate hepatic, renal, and marrow function received 3-week cycles of sorafenib at 400 mg oral twice daily and dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously (later reduced to 850 mg/m2). Patients were evaluated for response every 6 weeks. The primary objective was to determine the disease control rate (DCR) of sorafenib plus dacarbazine in the selected sarcoma subtypes.

RESULTS

The study included 37 patients (19 female); median age was 55 years (range 26-87); and histologies included LMS (22), SS (11), and MPNST (4). The DCR was 46% (17/37). Median progression-free survival was 13.4 weeks. The RECIST response rate was 14% (5/37). The Choi response rate was 51% (19/37). Median overall survival was 13.2 months. Of the first 25 patients, 15 (60%) required dacarbazine dose reductions for hematologic toxicity, with one episode of grade 5 neutropenic fever. After reducing the starting dose of dacarbazine to 850 mg/m2, only 3 of the final 12 (25%) patients required dose reduction.

CONCLUSION

This phase II study met its primary endpoint with an 18-week DCR of 46%. The clinical activity of dacarbazine plus sorafenib in patients with these diagnoses is modest.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Metastatic soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of relatively rare malignancies. Most patients are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy in the form of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Response rates are relatively low, and there is a need for better therapies. This clinical trial demonstrates that combining a cytotoxic therapy (dacarbazine) with an antiangiogenic small molecule (sorafenib) is feasible and associated with favorable disease-control rates; however, it also increases the potential for significant toxicity.

Precision Oncology in Sarcomas: Divide and Conquer

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies that exhibit remarkable heterogeneity, with more than 50 subtypes recognized. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology have resulted in the discovery of genetic events in these mesenchymal tumors, which in addition to enhancing understanding of the biology, have opened up avenues for molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy. This review focuses on how incorporation of next-generation sequencing has affected drug development in sarcomas and strategies for optimizing precision oncology for these rare cancers. In a significant percentage of soft tissue sarcomas, which represent up to 40% of all sarcomas, specific driver molecular abnormalities have been identified. The challenge to evaluate these mutations across rare cancer subtypes requires the careful characterization of these genetic alterations to further define compelling drivers with therapeutic implications. Novel models of clinical trial design also are needed. This shift would entail sustained efforts by the sarcoma community to move from one-size-fits-all trials, in which all sarcomas are treated similarly, to divide-and-conquer subtype-specific strategies.

Soft tissue leiomyosarcoma-diagnostics, management, and prognosis: Data of the registry cancer of the center of Tunisia

Background:

Soft tissue leiomyosarcomas are rare, accounting for almost 5%–10% of all soft tissue sarcomas; they account for almost 1% of all sarcomas. They are aggressive tumors where location, size, and management require a multidisciplinary approach. Since there are few series published, we here analyze epidemiological pattern, clinical and pathologic features of soft tissue leiomyosarcomas.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective study of 29 consecutive cases of histologically proven soft tissue leiomyosarcoma extracted from the database of the Cancer Registry of the Center of Tunisia and the Department of Pathology of Farhat Hached University Hospital of Sousse of Tunisia, during a 10-year period (from January 1996 to December 2005). Epidemiologic details, clinico-pathological features, and treatment modalities were assessed with focus on patients’ 5-year overall survival, tumor relapse, and metastases.

Results:

Soft tissue leiomyosarcoma accounted for 17.5% of all soft tissue sarcomas diagnosed at our pathology department. Most of patients were of advanced age (median: 52 years), with extremes ranging from 12 and 87 years. There was a slight male predominance (sex-ratio = 1.07). Tumors were located mostly in the lower limbs (45%). Deep sites as retroperitoneum was found only in two cases. Tumor size was more than 5 cm in 83% of cases (average size = 9.4 cm). Five cases had metastasis on initial staging. For 24 patients, the disease was locally limited at the moment of diagnosis. Palliative chemotherapy was indicated for four patients and surgery was performed for 20 patients. Local recurrence occurred in 11 patients (55% of operated patients) and metastasis in 6 patients. Overall, 5-year survival was about 24%.

Conclusion:

Our study results highlight the scarcity of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma. Unfortunately, unusual tumor sites, disease’s advanced stages, and intralesional resection made the prognosis poorer than in other series. Clinical course of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma was highly marked by local recurrence and metastasis.

The changing landscape of phase II/III metastatic sarcoma clinical trials-analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov

Background

Well-designed clinical trials are of great importance in validating novel treatments and ensuring an evidence-based approach for sarcoma. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive landscape of the characteristics of metastatic or advanced sarcoma clinical trials using the substantial resource of the ClincialTrials.gov database.

Methods

We identified 260,755 trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov in the last 20 years, and 277 of them were eligible for inclusion. The baseline characteristics were ascertained for each trial. The trials were systematically reviewed to validate their classification into 96 trials registered before 2008 and 181 trials registered between 2008 and 2017.

Results

We found that in the last decade, metastatic and advanced sarcoma trials were predominantly phase II-III studies (p = 0.048), were more likely to be ≥2 arms (17.7% vs 35.3%, respectively; p = 0.007), and were more likely to use randomized (13.5% vs 30.4%; p = 0.002) and double-blinded (2.1% vs 9.4%; p = 0.024) assignment than trials registered before 2008. Furthermore, in the last 10-year period, metastatic sarcoma trials were more likely to be conducted in Asia. Treatment involving target therapy and immunotherapy were more common (71.8% vs 37.5%; p < 0.001) than in previous years.

Conclusions

Our data showed provocative changes in the sarcoma landscape and demonstrated that the incidence of clinical trials with target therapy and immunotherapy is increasing. These findings emphasize the desperate need for novel strategies, including target therapy and immunotherapy, to improve the outcomes for patients with advanced sarcoma.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5163-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel: a regimen overestimated in refractory metastatic osteosarcoma?

Background

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GT) has been demonstrated to be effective against various types of solid tumors, including sarcoma. However, the regimen has not been confirmed in large, well-designed clinical trials in refractory metastatic osteosarcoma.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with refractory metastatic osteosarcoma at Peking University People’s Hospital who were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 8, and docetaxel (75 mg/m²) IV on Day 8, repeated every 21 days.

Results

A total of 52 patients with a median age of 18.4 years were treated with GT at the Peking University People’s Hospital from August 2012 to August 2017. A total of 174 courses were administered. Only five patients with pulmonary metastasis achieved a best response of stable disease (SD), while all other patients had progressive disease. The result was disappointing with an ORR of 0%, a DCR of 9.6%, and a median DOR of 3.5 months. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 69 (39.7%) courses and in 28 (53.8%) patients, most of which were myelosuppression, especially thrombocytopenia. No fatal adverse effect (AE) was found.

Conclusion

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GT) as a salvage regimen is well-tolerated but not as effective as expected in refractory metastatic osteosarcoma. This report highlights the need for the development of new approaches with higher activity in these patients.

A multicenter phase II study of Q3 week or weekly paclitaxel in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma

Paclitaxel (P) and bevacizumab (B) are agents that provide clinical benefit in advanced angiosarcoma (AS). The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of P-B in two different scheduled regimens. Patients were to receive P 200mg/m2 IV with B 15mg/kg IV every 21 days (Regimen A) or P 90mg/m2 IV weekly D1, 8, 15 with B 15mg/kg IV D1 of a 28 day cycle (Regimen B) x6 cycles. Maintenance B followed at a dose of 15 mg/kg intravenously once every 21 days. The primary end point was 4 month non-progression rate (NPR). A total of 16 patients were enrolled. 4 month NPR was 62.5% with median overall survival 16 months and median progression free survival 5.06 months. 11 patients made it to cycle 3 and were evaluable for response with 1 CR (9%), 4 PR (36%), 2 SD (18%), and 6 PD (36%). There were ten grade 3 toxicities and four grade 4 toxicities. The breakdown between the two regimens revealed comparable efficacy and safety. Paclitaxel and Bevacizumab is an active regimen in angiosarcoma. Q3 week and weekly paclitaxel appear similar in efficacy and safety.

Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: The Possibility of New Treatment Options Especially for Patients with Large Primary Tumor

The most widely accepted treatment for cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) is wide local excision and postoperative radiation to decrease the risk of recurrence. Positive surgical margins and large tumors (T2, >5 cm) are known to be associated with poor prognosis. Moreover, T2 tumors are known to be associated with positive surgical margins. According to previous reports, the majority of CAS patients in Japan had T2 tumors, whereas less than half of the patients in the studies from western countries did so. Consequently, the reported 5-year overall survival of Japanese CAS patients without distant metastasis was only 9%, lower than that for stage-IV melanoma. For patients with T2 tumors, management of subclinical metastasis should be considered when planning the initial treatment. Several attempts to control subclinical metastasis have been reported, such as using adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy in addition to conventional surgery plus radiation. Unfortunately, those attempts did not show any clinical benefit. Besides surgery, new chemotherapeutic approaches for advanced CAS have been introduced in the past couple of decades, such as paclitaxel and docetaxel. We proposed the use of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using taxanes instead of surgery plus radiation for patients with T2 tumors without distant metastasis and showed a high response ratio with prolonged survival. However, this prolonged survival was seen only in patients who received maintenance chemotherapy after CRT, indicating that continuous chemotherapy is mandatory to control subclinical residual tumors. With the recent development of targeted drugs for cancer, many potential drugs for CAS are now available. Given that CAS expresses a high level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, drugs that target VEGF signaling pathways such as anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also promising, and several successful treatments have been reported. Besides targeted drugs, several new cytotoxic anticancer drugs such as eribulin or trabectedin have also been shown to be effective for advanced sarcoma. However, most of the clinical trials did not include a sufficient number of CAS patients. Therefore, clinical trials focusing only on CAS should be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these new drugs.

Consensus and controversies regarding the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma

Optimal treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) requires multidisciplinary approach, incorporating chemotherapy with local control. Although current therapies are built on cooperative group trials, a comprehensive standard of care to guide clinical decision making has been lacking, especially for relapsed patients. Therefore, we assembled a panel of pediatric and adolescent and young adult sarcoma experts to develop treatment guidelines for managing RMS and to identify areas in which further research is needed. We created algorithms incorporating evidence-based care for patients with RMS, emphasizing the importance of clinical trials and close integration of all specialties involved in the care of these patients.

Desmoplastic Small Round Blue Cell Tumor: A Review of Treatment and Potential Therapeutic Genomic Alterations

Desmoplastic small round blue cell tumors (DSRCTs) originate from a cell with multilineage potential. A molecular hallmark of DSRCT is the EWS-WT1 reciprocal translocation. Ewing sarcoma and DSRCT are treated similarly due to similar oncogene activation pathways, and DSRCT has been represented in very limited numbers in sarcoma studies. Despite aggressive therapy, median survival ranges from 17 to 25 months, and 5-year survival rates remain around 15%, with higher survival reported among those undergoing removal of at least 90% of tumor in the absence of extraperitoneal metastasis. Almost 100% of these tumors contain t(11;22) (p13;q12) translocation, and it is likely that EWS-WT1 functions as a transcription factor possibly through WT1 targets. While there is no standard protocol for this aggressive disease, treatment usually includes the neoadjuvant HD P6 regimen (high-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (HD-CAV) alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) chemotherapy combined with aggressively attempted R0 resection). We aimed to review the molecular characteristics of DSRCTs to explore therapeutic opportunities for this extremely rare and aggressive cancer type.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

For many years, first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma has been doxorubicin. This study compared gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

The GeDDiS trial was a randomised controlled phase 3 trial done in 24 UK hospitals and one Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) hospital. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma of Trojani grade 2 or 3, disease progression before enrolment, and no previous chemotherapy for sarcoma or previous doxorubicin for any cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six cycles of intravenous doxorubicin 75 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks, or intravenous gemcitabine 675 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 8 every 3 weeks. Treatment was assigned using a minimisation algorithm incorporating a random element. Randomisation was stratified by age (≤18 years vs >18 years) and histological subtype. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and progression free at 24 weeks in the intention-to-treat population. Adherence to treatment and toxicity were analysed in the safety population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of their randomised treatment. The trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials (EudraCT) database (no 2009-014907-29) and with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry (ISRCTN07742377), and is now closed to patient entry.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 3, 2010, and Jan 20, 2014, 257 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (129 to doxorubicin and 128 to gemcitabine and docetaxel). Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 15·7-29·3). The proportion of patients alive and progression free at 24 weeks did not differ between those who received doxorubicin versus those who received gemcitabine and docetaxel (46·3% [95% CI 37·5-54·6] vs 46·4% [37·5-54·8]); median progression-free survival (23·3 weeks [95% CI 19·6-30·4] vs 23·7 weeks [18·1-20·0]; hazard ratio [HR] for progression-free survival 1·28, 95% CI 0·99-1·65, p=0·06). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (32 [25%] of 128 patients who received doxorubicin and 25 [20%] of 126 patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel), febrile neutropenia (26 [20%] and 15 [12%]), fatigue (eight [6%] and 17 [14%]), oral mucositis (18 [14%] and two [2%]), and pain (ten [8%] and 13 [10%]). The three most common serious adverse events, representing 111 (39%) of all 285 serious adverse events recorded, were febrile neutropenia (27 [17%] of 155 serious adverse events in patients who received doxorubicin and 15 [12%] of 130 serious adverse events in patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel, fever (18 [12%] and 19 [15%]), and neutropenia (22 [14%] and ten [8%]). 154 (60%) of 257 patients died in the intention-to-treat population: 74 (57%) of 129 patients in the doxorubicin group and 80 (63%) of 128 in the gemcitabine and docetaxel group. No deaths were related to the treatment, but two deaths were due to a combination of disease progression and treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Doxorubicin should remain the standard first-line treatment for most patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. These results provide evidence for clinicians to consider with their patients when selecting first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, Sarcoma UK, and Clinical Trial Unit Kantonsspital St Gallen.

Primary Cardiac Leiomyosarcoma: A 27-Month Survival with Surgery and Chemotherapy

The patient was a 39-year-old man hospitalized due to the presence of a cardiac mass and heart failure. Emergency tumor resection and mitral valve replacement were performed. The pathological findings of the tumor led to a diagnosis of cardiac leiomyosarcoma. After the operation, multiple metastases were found. The patient underwent three courses of chemotherapies: adriamycin, ifosfamide, dacarbazine, and mesna (MAID therapy), gemcitabine plus docetaxel, and sunitinib. During MAID therapy, the patient underwent resection of gastrointestinal metastases twice due to gastrointestinal hemorrhaging. Although he died 27 months after the initial treatment, use of multimodal therapy was effective in achieving a longer survival for the patient.

Treatment of advanced, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: latest evidence and clinical considerations

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with over 50 subtypes. Historically, there have been few systemic treatment options for this relatively rare disease. Traditional cytotoxic agents, such as anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and taxanes have limited clinical benefit beyond the first-line setting; across all high-grade STS subtypes, median overall survival remains approximately 12-18 months for advanced metastatic disease. The development of targeted therapies has led to recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of four new treatments for high-grade STS in the advanced metastatic setting. Among these, olaratumab is most notable for its improvement in overall survival for patients with anthracycline-naïve disease. Further progress in STS management will rely on novel trial design, subtype-specific therapies and validation of biomarkers to tailor therapy. Immunotherapy has shown promise as a new, but yet undiscovered frontier in the management of STS.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent bone and soft tissue sarcoma: Results from a single-institutional analysis

Background

Combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel has been reported to be a good therapeutic strategy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine with docetaxel in Japanese patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the effect of gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy on overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity in 42 patients with bone or soft tissue sarcoma who had received the therapy between October 2006 and September 2015, at Tohoku University Hospital.

Results

The median age was 55 years; 23 patients were men, and 19 were women. Eight had bone sarcoma and 34 had soft tissue sarcoma. Forty patients (95%) had previously been treated with one or more chemotherapeutic regimens. The overall response rate was 6.9% and the disease control rate was 55%. The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months and the median overall survival was 14.3 months. Grade 3 or more neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 74% and 4.8% of all patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The response rate was lower and myelosuppression was more frequently observed than in other previous reports. On the other hand, most of toxicities were enough manageable. In addition, some patients had long survival with a good response. Our study supports the notion that gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy is a good therapeutic option for treating patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma as well as bone sarcoma, also in Asian populations.

Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: current treatment landscape and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has increased over the last few years. Doxorubicin monotherapy or in combination is now the established first line treatment. Beyond first line treatment, no standard therapy has been established. Novel drugs have reached the late-clinical stage development demonstrating to be effective in controlled studies. While these novel treatments can be beneficial to a subset of patients, even producing long lasting remissions, a significant fraction of the STS population derives limited benefit. This is due to the fact that STS is a very heterogeneous disease with different histopathologic features, biological characteristics and clinical behaviour. Areas covered: The primary aim of this review is to summarize data from recent phase III clinical trials in unselected STS population, and to discuss their impact on the current clinical practice. Phase I-II trials of special interest are discussed as well. Expert commentary: Although our efforts in this research task are ongoing, the integration of biological therapies, the anti-angiogenesis targeted treatments as well as immunotherapy that may further improve the long term control of advanced STS are of special clinical interest. Clinical management of advanced STS should be tailored to each patient in order to optimize therapy.

Docetaxel, bevacizumab, and gemcitabine for very high risk sarcomas in adolescents and young adults: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with very high risk sarcomas have poor outcomes and are in need of novel therapies.

PROCEDURE

From January 2005 to February 2016, we retrospectively identified all AYA patients with relapsed or metastatic high-grade sarcomas, who were treated with at least one cycle of docetaxel (T), bevacizumab (A), and gemcitabine (G) (TAG ; T = 100 mg/m² Day 8, A = 15 mg/kg Day 1, G = 1,000 mg/m² Days 1 and 8).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients, median age of 20 (15-30), received a total of 80 cycles of TAG, and were followed for a median of 83 months. Diagnosis included osteosarcoma (OST; 8), Ewing sarcoma (3), and soft tissue sarcoma (3). Five of 14 patients achieved clinical remission (CR), 3 had partial responses (PR), 3 had stable disease (SD), and 3 had progressive disease (PD). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7 and 19 months, respectively. The objective response rate (CR + PR) and tumor control rate (CR + PR + SD) were 57% and 79%, respectively, with two patients alive after 5 years; toxicities included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and capillary leak syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study builds on previous studies utilizing TAG in adult leiomyosarcoma (LMS) by focusing on AYA, non-LMS sarcomas, especially OST. Our experience suggests that TAG is well tolerated and has activity in very high risk sarcomas in AYA.

Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Combination for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Nationwide Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

This nationwide retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) as an off-label therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma, which has limited treatment options owing to its rare occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 228 patients received GD therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma from 2009 to 2014 in Korea. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical medical records and claims data of these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients in 20 medical centers were included in the final analysis (median age, 50.0 years). The objective response rate was 15.1% (34/218, in the leiomyosarcoma subgroup; 26.3%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 10.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4 to 12.2) and 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.7), respectively. The treatment was discontinued in 7.8% of patients owing to adverse events; however, there was no adverse event-related death. Neutropenia (35.7%) and anemia (15.1%) were the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities. Univariate analysis for identifying the predictors of the progression-free survival period revealed that patients aged ≤ 50 years had a hazard ratio of 1.388 (95% CI, 1.027 to 1.875; p < 0.05) relative to those aged > 50 years, and the group with leiomyosarcoma had a hazard ratio of 0.693 (95% CI, 0.493 to 0.975; p < 0.05) relative to the group with other histopathological subtypes.

CONCLUSION

GD therapy was tolerable and effective for Korean patients with soft tissue sarcoma. In conclusion, for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, especially leiomyosarcoma, GD therapy could be an important therapeutic option.

Targeted therapy for soft tissue sarcomas in adolescents and young adults

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from the mesenchyme. Even though they affect individuals in all age groups, the prevalence of subtypes of STSs changes significantly from childhood through adolescence into adulthood. The mainstay of therapy is surgery, with or without the addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. These treatment modalities are associated, in many cases, with significant morbidity and, given the heterogeneity of tumor histologies encompassed by the term "STS", have not uniformly improved outcomes. Moreover, some subgroups of STSs appear to be more, and others less, responsive to conventional chemotherapy agents. Over the last two decades, our understanding of the biology of STSs is slowly increasing, allowing for the development of more targeted therapies. We review the new treatment modalities that have been tested on patients with STSs, with a special focus on adolescents and young adults, a group of patients that is often underrepresented in clinical trials and has not received the dedicated attention it deserves, given the significant differences in biology and treatment response in comparison to children and adults.

Phase III Soft Tissue Sarcoma Trials: Success or Failure?

OPINION STATEMENT

Two recently reported phase III randomised control trials (RCTs) have resulted in the registration of two new systemic therapies for advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Both of these trials' designs were informed by phase II data that guided the selection of sensitive STS diagnoses, enabling the demonstration of benefit in certain subtypes. A number of other phase III trials reported in the last 18 months have seemingly fit into a recurrent pattern of failure-promising efficacy signals in earlier phase studies being lost in the survival follow-up of large, highly heterogeneous cohorts. Greater effort is needed to identify histological and molecularly defined subgroups associated with differential treatment response in order to avoid the tremendous disappointment and loss of resources associated with a failed phase III trial. Additionally, improvements in available treatment of advanced STS have underpinned a prolongation in overall survival (OS). Consequently, surrogate efficacy endpoints are of increasing importance to STS drug trials. Whilst progression-free survival (PFS) should arguably replace overall survival as the primary endpoint of choice in first-line studies, more work is required to provide definitive validation of surrogacy, as well as developing more sophisticated techniques of assessing radiological response and expanding the inclusion of quality-of-life-related endpoints.

Feasibility and efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy for bone and soft tissue sarcomas: multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 134 patients

Background

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas (BSTS) are rare malignant tumors. Recently, the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) was shown to have activity as second-line setting in BSTS. However, the efficacy as first-line and adjuvant settings and precise profiles of adverse events in Japanese patients are not known yet. In the present study, the feasibility and efficacy of GD in patients with BSTS were investigated.

Methods

Patients with BSTS treated with GD in our institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Information regarding clinical features, adverse events, and outcome was collected and statistically studied. Factors related to survival were analyzed using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression method.

Results

A total of 134 patients were analyzed. GD was carried out as adjuvant setting in 9, first-line in 23, second-line in 56, and third-or-greater line in 46 patients. The response rate (RR) for all patients was 9.7%. RR for the patients treated as adjuvant or first-line setting was 18.8%, whereas that as second-or-greater line was 6.9%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 4.8 (95% CI 3.5–6.1) and 16.4 (95% CI 9.8–22.9) months, respectively. Survival tended to be better in the patients treated as first-line than in those treated as second-or-greater line. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that history of prior chemotherapy (p = 0.046) and response to GD (p = 0.009) was significantly associated with PFS and OS, respectively. The leucopenia and neutropenia were the most frequent adverse events, and grade 3 or 4 leucopenia and neutropenia were observed in 69.4 and 72.4% of the patients. Grade 2 or 3 pneumonitis was observed in one (0.7%) and four (3.0%) patients, respectively. All the patients with pneumonitis had experienced prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

Conclusions

GD used as both first- and second/later line is effective chemotherapy for a proportion of patients with advanced BSTS. Higher response rate and better outcome was achieved in chemotherapy-naïve patients. This regimen is associated with high incidence of severe hematological toxicity, as well as the risk of severe pneumonitis, especially in pre-treated patients. GD is promising for further analysis by phase III study for the patients with BSTS.

Efficacy of trabectedin for the treatment of liposarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Trabectedin (ET-743) is a synthetic marine derived alkylating agent, extracted originally from a Caribbean Sea sponge. It is approved for the treatment of Soft Tissue sarcomas (STS) in Europe and recently by the FDA for liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas.

AREAS COVERED

Trabectedin has multiple mechanisms of action, including one targeting the FUS-CHOP oncogene in Myxoid/Round cell Liposarcomas. Numerous Phase I, II and III clinical trials have been conducted with Trabectedin. It has been studied as monotherapy or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. The recommended dose based on clinical trials is 1.5 milligrams/m(2) continuous infusion over 24 hours once every 3 weeks for STS with evidence of disease control in multiple clinical trials at this dose. The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities include neutropenia and transient noncumulative elevations of ALT and AST. Steroid pretreatment has shown efficacy in reducing liver and bone marrow toxicity. In phase III testing comparing trabectedin to dacarbazine, trabectedin was associated with a significantly improved progression free survival rate in patients with advanced lipo- and leiomyosarcomas.

EXPERT OPINION

Trabectedin is an important new addition to the limited treatment options currently available for STS, especially for patients with liposarcoma that have progressed on standard chemotherapeutic regimens.

Higher Gemcitabine Dose Was Associated With Better Outcome of Osteosarcoma Patients Receiving Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GEM + DOC) chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma was evaluated.

METHODS

Data of 53 patients from 9 institutions, who received GEM (675 or 900 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) and DOC (100 mg/m(2) on day 8), were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

GEM + DOC was administered as adjuvant (n = 25) or palliative chemotherapy (n = 28). Patients received a median 3 courses (range, 1-10 courses). Objective response rate (CR + PR, where CR is complete response and PR is partial response) and disease control rate (CR+ PR + SD, where SD is stable disease) were 14.3% and 28.6%, respectively. Disease control rate was higher in patients receiving 900 mg/m(2) GEM than in patients receiving 675 mg/m(2) (50.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.03). Higher GEM dose was associated with better survival, both in adjuvant (1-year overall survival, 90.9 ± 8.7% vs. 38.5 ± 13.5%, P = 0.002) and palliative settings (50.0 ± 14.4% vs. 31.3 ± 11.6%, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are necessary to investigate the efficacy of more aggressive and higher doses of GEM + DOC chemotherapy in osteosarcoma.

Chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcoma is a term used to describe a heterogeneous group of many rare tumors. Since the initial description of activity of doxorubicin, several additional agents have been brought to bear in the treatment of these diseases. Despite 2 recent drug approvals, doxorubicin and ifosfamide remain the most effective chemotherapy drugs available for the treatment of majority of these tumors. Optimal dosing and administration influence outcomes because of the steep dose-response curves associated with these agents. The debate endures regarding whether patients who have advanced disease should routinely receive single agents sequentially or in combination. Adjuvant therapy remains similarly controversial, although meta-analyses do support its use. Contemporary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma routinely incorporates additional lines of treatment that have become available over the last 15 years. Fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine with or without docetaxel is a standard second-line treatment. In keeping with the paradigm shift favoring subset-specific therapy, several recent approvals are linked with specific sarcoma subtypes. Eribulin has recently been approved on the basis of improved overall survival for patients with adipocytic sarcomas, and trabectedin is now approved in the United States for patients with leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma. Within the spectrum of targeted therapies, pazopanib is approved for all nonadipocytic sarcomas, and imatinib is approved for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Each of these drugs represents incremental rather than radical progress, although they constitute important and much needed treatment options for patients with these diseases. Cancer 2016;122:2952-2960. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Overall Survival and Response to Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Extrauterine Leiomyosarcoma

Background. Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) represent a heterogeneous subset of soft tissue sarcomas. Factors influencing prognosis for patients with metastatic extrauterine LMS (euLMS) are not well described. Limited data are available regarding responses to systemic therapy. Methods. We collected clinical and pathologic information for all patients with metastatic euLMS seen at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1989 and 2012. Objective responses to first-line therapy were analyzed for a subset of patients with available baseline and on-treatment imaging using RECIST 1.1. Results. 215 patients with metastatic euLMS had a median overall survival (OS) of 2.6 years from the time of metastasis. Older age, male sex, and ≥3 initial sites of metastasis were associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis. Objective response rate (ORR) in N = 113 was 19% overall and 25%, 26%, and 25% for gemcitabine, gemcitabine plus docetaxel, and anthracycline-alkylator combinations. Patients whose tumors objectively responded to first-line therapy had a lower risk of death versus those who did not (Hazard Ratio 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26–0.79, p = 0.005). Conclusions. Anthracycline- and gemcitabine-based regimens have similar activity in this cohort of euLMS. Prognostic factors for OS include older age, male sex, and ≥3 initial sites.

Update on clinical research and state of the art management of patients with advanced sarcomas and GIST

Sarcomas constitute a rare group of malignancies. According to histology, different treatment options are effective. For gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), targeted treatment with imatinib controls about 20% of advanced or metastatic disease, whereas chemotherapy is more effective for the rest of the sarcomas. Currently, new targeted treatments are emerging, showing activity in cases resistant to established primary treatment. On the other hand, the exciting results of immunotherapy for other solid tumours, for example, melanoma and lung cancer, make it a promising option in the fight against sarcomas. In this review, we have collected data of established and promising treatments in trials with a view to facilitating the sequencing of sarcoma treatments and for identifying the future of these therapeutic options.

A Phase II Study of Gemcitabine, Vincristine, and Cisplatin As Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (aSTS) typically have a poor prognosis. Patients progressing to doxorubicin-based regimen have limited therapeutic options. Monotherapy with cytotoxic drugs appears to have only modest activity in the second-line setting. The purpose of this phase II study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination regimen with gemcitabine, vincristine, and cisplatin (GVP) as a salvage treatment for patients with aSTS.Eligible patients were female with 18∼75 years old, and had aSTS that had progressed after 1 prior anthracyclines-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients were treated with 1,000 mg/m gemcitabine intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8, 1.4 mg/m (max 2 mg) vincristine IV on day 1 and 25 mg/m cisplatin IV on days 1 through 3 every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), over response rate (ORR) and safety. This trial was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (no. NCT01192633).A total of 26 patients with a median age 47 years (21-72) were recruited. ORR was 23.1% [1 complete response and 5 partial responses]. The median PFS and OS were 4.8 (95% CI, 0.1-9.5) months and 15.0 (95% CI, 6.1-23.9) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (34.6%), leukopenia (23.1%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%) and anemia (3.8%). No febrile neutropenia and grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurred. The most frequent non-hematologic toxicities were nausea/vomiting (50.0%), fatigue (30.8%), and fever (11.5%).We conclude that GVP regimen is effective with a favorable safety profile as the second-line chemotherapy in aSTS patients, which warrants further investigation in a phase III study.