1
|
Schroeder DW, Foster BR, Young DJ, Coakley FV. Targeted biopsy of the prostate. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04452-z. [PMID: 38976055 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04452-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
Diagnostic multiparametric MRI of the prostate has steadily evolved over the last three decades and can now reliably depict the dominant tumor in most men with prostate cancer. In response, several methods of targeted biopsy to direct tissue sampling of suspected tumor foci seen at multiparametric MRI have been developed and successfully tested in recent years, including software-assisted MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy and direct MRI-guided in-bore biopsy. These advances are leading to a sea change in the approach to prostate cancer diagnosis, with the traditional approach of blind systematic biopsy increasingly being replaced by MRI directed targeted biopsy. This review aims to describe the current status of targeted biopsy, with an emphasis on the relative accuracy of different techniques. The results of several critical large multicenter trials are presented, while unanswered questions that require more research are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Schroeder
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR, 97239, United States
| | - Bryan R Foster
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR, 97239, United States
| | - Daniel J Young
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR, 97239, United States
| | - Fergus V Coakley
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR, 97239, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acosta H, Sadahira T, Sekito T, Maruyama Y, Iwata T, Araki M, Ogawa K, Tsuboi I, Wada K. Post-prostate biopsy acute bacterial prostatitis and screening cultures using selective media: An overview. Int J Urol 2022; 29:486-493. [PMID: 35144308 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The development of several culture media and the availability to isolate and treat pathogens prior to a surgical procedure give us the ability to minimize treatment-related complications, and ultimately results in better outcomes for patients and avoidance of unwanted post-procedure inpatient admissions. In the last decade, an increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, especially extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli and fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens, has been reported. These resistant species frequently colonize the rectal flora and gain access to the systemic circulation via the rectal plexus following a prostate biopsy. The bacteria can eventually lead to life-threatening complications, which is especially important in high-risk patients with multiple co-morbidities. Previously published studies have focused on the isolation of these pathogens with selective media before an invasive procedure and the potential benefits of incorporating the use of selective media as a mandatory pre-operative step. This preventive measure will allow us to offer a tailored prophylactic treatment that benefits patients and reduces the economic burden for the hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herik Acosta
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Sadahira
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takanori Sekito
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuki Maruyama
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kohei Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding Z, Song D, Wu H, Tian H, Ye X, Liang W, Xu J, Dong F. Development and validation of a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and elastography-derived data for the stratification of patients with prostate cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:3252-3262. [PMID: 34249651 DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background This study sought to develop and validate a nomogram combining the elastographic Q-analysis score (EQS), the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, and clinical parameters for the stratification of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods A retrospective study was conducted of 375 patients with 375 lesions who underwent volume-navigation transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI)-fusion targeted biopsies between April 2017 and January 2020. Based on a multivariate logistic regression model, a nomogram was created to assess any PCa and high-risk PCa [Gleason score (GS) ≥4+3] using data from patients diagnosed between April 2017 and June 2019 (n=271), and was validated in patients diagnosed after July 2019 (n=104). The nomogram's performance was evaluated based on its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Results The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the nomogram for predicting any PCa and high-risk PCa were 0.949 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.921 to 0.978] and 0.936 (95% CI, 0.906 to 0.965), respectively, in the training cohort, and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.894 to 0.997) and 0.971 (95% CI, 0.9331 to 1), respectively, in the validation cohort. The nomogram was well calibrated, and no significant difference was found between the predicted and observed probabilities. A decision curve analysis (DCA) for the nomogram with and without the EQS showed that the threshold probability of for any PCa was <67%. Conclusions The nomogram that combined elastography-derived and MP-MRI data was more clinically useful than the model based on PI-RADS and clinical parameters alone. Our nomogram could aid urologists to make decisions and avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhimin Ding
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Di Song
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Huaiyu Wu
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Hongtian Tian
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiuqin Ye
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Weiyu Liang
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinfeng Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Fajin Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Szabo RJ. "Free-Hand" Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia: Review of the Literature. J Endourol 2021; 35:525-543. [PMID: 33380279 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.1093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The recent plethora of reports of "free-hand" transperineal prostate biopsy (fTP-Bx) under local anesthesia (LA) demonstrate that many centers consider this technique to be a safer and possibly more accurate approach to prostate biopsy in the clinic setting. Materials and Methods: The literature was searched for fTP-Bx, and summary tables were compiled. Studies on the costs of postprostate biopsy sepsis were also researched. Results: The search found 11,999 cases of fTP-Bx under LA with and without sedation over 29 mutually exclusive studies. Pooled averages calculated for age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, and cores sampled were 67.3 years, 10.4 ng/mL, 47.7 mL, 0.24 ng/mL/cc, and 15.3 cores, respectively. Detection of overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (Gleason score ≥7) prostate cancer (csPCa) averaged 45.5% (3796/8338) and 25.1% (1141/4541), respectively. After subgrouping the studies by biopsy technique, studies that used MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy in some or all biopsy cases averaged an overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of 50.0% (741/1483) (p < 0.0001) and 42.8% (635/1483) (p < 0.0001), respectively. Visual analog scale pain ratings and procedure times averaged 3.17 and 13.1 minutes, respectively. Averages for complications of sepsis and acute urinary retention were 0.0% (0/7396) and 2.1% (120/5693), respectively. A total of 10.2% (1055/10,334) of cases received no antibiotic prophylaxis. If fTP-Bx under LA replaced transrectal prostate biopsy (TR-Bx) in the United States, the estimated annual savings would be $341,676,800-$752,540,000 through the virtual elimination of admissions for postbiopsy sepsis. Conclusions: Many centers around the world have adopted fTP-Bx because it virtually eliminates sepsis, may improve detection rates of csPCa and can be easily integrated into a normal clinic workflow using only LA. If all urologists in the United States abandoned TR-Bx for fTP-Bx, the potential savings in health care costs of complications would be significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Szabo
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente, Irvine, California, USA.,Department of Urology, Cinical Associate Professor, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.,Department of Urology, Volunteer Faculty, Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown LC, Ahmed HU, Faria R, El-Shater Bosaily A, Gabe R, Kaplan RS, Parmar M, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Bott S, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, Ghei M, Henderson A, Persad R, Rosario DJ, Shergill I, Winkler M, Soares M, Spackman E, Sculpher M, Emberton M. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-176. [PMID: 30040065 DOI: 10.3310/hta22390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men with suspected prostate cancer usually undergo transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. TRUS-guided biopsy can cause side effects and has relatively poor diagnostic accuracy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) used as a triage test might allow men to avoid unnecessary TRUS-guided biopsy and improve diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVES To (1) assess the ability of mpMRI to identify men who can safely avoid unnecessary biopsy, (2) assess the ability of the mpMRI-based pathway to improve the rate of detection of clinically significant (CS) cancer compared with TRUS-guided biopsy and (3) estimate the cost-effectiveness of a mpMRI-based diagnostic pathway. DESIGN A validating paired-cohort study and an economic evaluation using a decision-analytic model. SETTING Eleven NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS Men at risk of prostate cancer undergoing a first prostate biopsy. INTERVENTIONS Participants underwent three tests: (1) mpMRI (the index test), (2) TRUS-guided biopsy (the current standard) and (3) template prostate mapping (TPM) biopsy (the reference test). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, TRUS-guided biopsy and TPM-biopsy measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) using primary and secondary definitions of CS cancer. The percentage of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was used to identify men who might be able to avoid biopsy. RESULTS Diagnostic study - a total of 740 men were registered and 576 underwent all three tests. According to TPM-biopsy, the prevalence of any cancer was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67% to 75%]. The prevalence of CS cancer according to the primary definition (a Gleason score of ≥ 4 + 3 and/or cancer core length of ≥ 6 mm) was 40% (95% CI 36% to 44%). For CS cancer, TRUS-guided biopsy showed a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 42% to 55%), specificity of 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%), PPV of 90% (95% CI 83% to 94%) and NPV of 74% (95% CI 69% to 78%). The sensitivity of mpMRI was 93% (95% CI 88% to 96%), specificity was 41% (95% CI 36% to 46%), PPV was 51% (95% CI 46% to 56%) and NPV was 89% (95% CI 83% to 94%). A negative mpMRI scan was recorded for 158 men (27%). Of these, 17 were found to have CS cancer on TPM-biopsy. Economic evaluation - the most cost-effective strategy involved testing all men with mpMRI, followed by MRI-guided TRUS-guided biopsy in those patients with suspected CS cancer, followed by rebiopsy if CS cancer was not detected. This strategy is cost-effective at the TRUS-guided biopsy definition 2 (any Gleason pattern of ≥ 4 and/or cancer core length of ≥ 4 mm), mpMRI definition 2 (lesion volume of ≥ 0.2 ml and/or Gleason score of ≥ 3 + 4) and cut-off point 2 (likely to be benign) and detects 95% (95% CI 92% to 98%) of CS cancers. The main drivers of cost-effectiveness were the unit costs of tests, the improvement in sensitivity of MRI-guided TRUS-guided biopsy compared with blind TRUS-guided biopsy and the longer-term costs and outcomes of men with cancer. LIMITATIONS The PROstate Magnetic resonance Imaging Study (PROMIS) was carried out in a selected group and excluded men with a prostate volume of > 100 ml, who are less likely to have cancer. The limitations in the economic modelling arise from the limited evidence on the long-term outcomes of men with prostate cancer and on the sensitivity of MRI-targeted repeat biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating mpMRI into the diagnostic pathway as an initial test prior to prostate biopsy may (1) reduce the proportion of men having unnecessary biopsies, (2) improve the detection of CS prostate cancer and (3) increase the cost-effectiveness of the prostate cancer diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. The PROMIS data set will be used for future research; this is likely to include modelling prognostic factors for CS cancer, optimising MRI scan sequencing and biomarker or translational research analyses using the blood and urine samples collected. Better-quality evidence on long-term outcomes in prostate cancer under the various management strategies is required to better assess cost-effectiveness. The value-of-information analysis should be developed further to assess new research to commission. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16082556 and NCT01292291. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 39. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. This project was also supported and partially funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London (UCL) Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCL and by The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research Biomedical Research Centre and was co-ordinated by the Medical Research Council's Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (grant code MC_UU_12023/28). It was sponsored by UCL. Funding for the additional collection of blood and urine samples for translational research was provided by Prostate Cancer UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Clare Brown
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rita Faria
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Hull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Richard S Kaplan
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mahesh Parmar
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Katie Ward
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexander Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Parker
- Department of Academic Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | - Maneesh Ghei
- Department of Urology, Whittington Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Rajendra Persad
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Marta Soares
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Eldon Spackman
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brewster DH, Fischbacher CM, Nolan J, Nowell S, Redpath D, Nabi G. Risk of hospitalization and death following prostate biopsy in Scotland. Public Health 2017; 142:102-110. [PMID: 27810089 PMCID: PMC5226055 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Revised: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the risk of hospitalization and death following prostate biopsy. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Our study population comprised 10,285 patients with a record of first ever prostate biopsy between 2009 and 2013 on computerized acute hospital discharge or outpatient records covering Scotland. Using the general population as a comparison group, expected numbers of admissions/deaths were derived by applying age-, sex-, deprivation category-, and calendar year-specific rates of hospital admissions/deaths to the study population. Indirectly standardized hospital admission ratios (SHRs) and mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated by dividing the observed numbers of admissions/deaths by expected numbers. RESULTS Compared with background rates, patients were more likely to be admitted to hospital within 30 days (SHR 2.7; 95% confidence interval 2.4, 2.9) and 120 days (SHR 4.0; 3.8, 4.1) of biopsy. Patients with prior co-morbidity had higher SHRs. The risk of death within 30 days of biopsy was not increased significantly (SMR 1.6; 0.9, 2.7), but within 120 days, the risk of death was significantly higher than expected (SMR 1.9; 1.5, 2.4). The risk of death increased with age and tended to be higher among patients with prior co-morbidity. Overall risks of hospitalization and of death up to 120 days were increased both in men diagnosed and those not diagnosed with prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS Higher rates of adverse events in older patients and patients with prior co-morbidity emphasizes the need for careful patient selection for prostate biopsy and justifies ongoing efforts to minimize the risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D H Brewster
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
| | - C M Fischbacher
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - J Nolan
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - S Nowell
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - D Redpath
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - G Nabi
- Section of Academic Urology, Cancer Research Division, School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK; Department of Surgical Urology, Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tamarelle B, Perrin P, Devonec M, Paparel P, Ruffion A. [Hospitalization rate in relation to severe complications of transrectal prostate biopsy: About 2715 patients biopsied]. Prog Urol 2016; 26:628-634. [PMID: 27717737 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.09.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2015] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 09/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
MAIN OBJECTIVE To identify hospitalizations directly related to a complication occurring within 30 days following a transrectal prostate biopsy (PBP). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES Overall hospitalization rates, mortality rates, potential predisposing factors for complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Single-center study including all patients who underwent PBP between January 2005 and January 2012. Any hospitalization occurring within 30 days of the PBP for urgent motive was considered potentially attributable to biopsy. We identified the reason for hospitalization with direct complications (urinary infection or fever, rectal bleeding, bladder caillotage, retention) and indirect (underlying comorbidities decompensation) of the biopsy. The contributing factors were anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment well as waning immunity factors (corticosteroid therapy, HIV, chemotherapy or immunodulateur). RESULTS Among 2715 men who underwent PBP, there were 120 (4.4%) hospitalizations including 28 (1.03%) caused by the biopsy. Twenty-five (0.92%) were related to a direct complication of biopsy: 14 (56%) for urinary tract infection or fever including 1 hospitalization in intensive care, 5 (20%) for rectal bleeding which required several transfusions 1, 10 (40%) urinary retention and 3 (0.11%) for an indirect complication (2 coronary syndromes and 1 respiratory failure). Several direct complications were associated in 3 cases. Only two hospitalizations associated with rectal bleeding were taking an antiplatelet or anticoagulant. There was no association between hospitalization for urinary tract infections and a decreased immune status. The first death observed in our study occurred at D31 of pulmonary embolism (advanced metastatic patient with bladder cancer). Twenty (60.6%) patients urgently hospitalized did not have prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS Within this large sample of patients the overall rate of hospitalization due to the realization of a PBP was 1%. It has not been found predictive of complications leading to hospitalization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Tamarelle
- Service urologie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - P Perrin
- Service urologie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - M Devonec
- Service urologie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - P Paparel
- Service urologie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - A Ruffion
- Service urologie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, Schaeffer E, Schiavina R, Taneja S, Weidner W, Loeb S. Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy. Eur Urol 2016; 71:353-365. [PMID: 27543165 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 312] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate biopsy (PB) represents the gold standard method to confirm the presence of cancer. In addition to traditional random or systematic approaches, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided technique has been introduced recently. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of complications after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided, transperineal, and MRI-guided PB. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic literature search of Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases up to October 2015, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Complications and mortality following random, systematic, and image-guided PBs were reviewed. Eighty-five references were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most frequent complication after PB was minor and self-limiting bleeding (hematuria and hematospermia), regardless of the biopsy approach. Occurrence of rectal bleeding was comparable for traditional TRUS-guided and image-guided PBs. Almost 25% of patients experienced lower urinary tract symptoms, but only a few had urinary retention, with higher rates after a transperineal approach. Temporary erectile dysfunction was not negligible, with a return to baseline after 1-6 mo. The incidence of infective complications is increasing, with higher rates among men with medical comorbidities and older age. Transperineal and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy may reduce the risk of severe infectious complications. Mortality after PB is uncommon, regardless of biopsy technique. CONCLUSIONS Complications after PB are frequent but often self-limiting. The incidence of hospitalization due to severe infections is continuously increasing. The patient's general health status, risk factors, and likelihood of antimicrobial resistance should be carefully appraised before scheduling a PB. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the variety and incidence of complications after prostate biopsy. Even if frequent, complications seldom represent a problem for the patient. The most troublesome complications are infections. To minimize this risk, the patient's medical condition should be carefully evaluated before biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Borghesi
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Cardio-Nephro-Thoracic Sciences Doctorate, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Hashim Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Nam
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Edward Schaeffer
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Cardio-Nephro-Thoracic Sciences Doctorate, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Samir Taneja
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wolfgang Weidner
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, University Clinic of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D’Amico AV. Reply to M.C. Scholz et al. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1284. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.9763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony V. D’Amico
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:550-7. [PMID: 25714284 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to test the association between diffusion-weighted MRI and prostate cancer Gleason score at both biopsy and final pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients with prostate cancer (n = 72) underwent diffusion-weighted MRI (b values, 0, 800, and 1600 s/mm(2)) with an endorectal coil. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and ADC ratio were obtained in normal and pathologic tissue and were correlated with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (n = 72) and histopathologic (n = 39) Gleason scores using the ANOVA test. ADC accuracy was estimated using ROC curves. RESULTS. Lesions suspicious for prostate cancer were detected in 65 patients. The mean ADC was 1.47 and 0.87 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for normal and pathologic tissue, respectively (p < 0.001). When we divided the population into four groups (normal tissue and biopsy Gleason scores of 6, 7, and 8-10), then the mean ADC value was 1.47, 0.96, 0.80, and 0.78 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively (p < 0.001). The ADC ratio decreased along with an increase in biopsy Gleason score (66.9%, 56.7%, and 51.5% for Gleason scores of 6, 7 and 8-10, respectively) (ANOVA, p = 0.003) and pathologic Gleason score (ANOVA, p < 0.001). ROC curves had an AUC of 0.94 and 0.86 for ADC and ADC ratio, respectively (p = 0.012 and 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSION. Decreasing ADC values may represent a strong risk factor of harboring a poorly differentiated prostate cancer, independently of biopsy characteristics.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bruyère F, Malavaud S, Bertrand P, Decock A, Cariou G, Doublet JD, Bernard L, Bugel H, Conquy S, Sotto A, Boiteux JP, Pogu B, Rebillard X, Mongiat-Artus P, Coloby P. Prosbiotate: A Multicenter, Prospective Analysis of Infectious Complications after Prostate Biopsy. J Urol 2015; 193:145-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Franck Bruyère
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universtaire, Tours, France
- Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, Pôle de Recherche et d'Enseignement Supérieur Centre, Val de Loire Université, Tours, France
| | - Sandra Malavaud
- Unité Opérationnelle en Hygiène, Epidemiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Philippe Bertrand
- Biostatistics Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universtaire, Tours, France
- Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, Pôle de Recherche et d'Enseignement Supérieur Centre, Val de Loire Université, Tours, France
| | - Aliette Decock
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universtaire, Tours, France
| | - Gérard Cariou
- Urology Department, DUNEGO/Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR_S1165, Hôpital Saint-Louis-Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | | | - Louis Bernard
- Infectious Disease Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universtaire, Tours, France
- Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, Pôle de Recherche et d'Enseignement Supérieur Centre, Val de Loire Université, Tours, France
| | - Hubert Bugel
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Elbeuf-Louviers, Val De Reuil, France
| | - Sophie Conquy
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Albert Sotto
- Infectious Disease Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universtaire Nîmes and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1047, UFR Médecine, Nîmes, France
| | - Jean Paul Boiteux
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universtaire Gabriel Montpied, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Bertrand Pogu
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier Chalons-en-Champagne, Chalons-en-Champagne, France
| | | | - Pierre Mongiat-Artus
- Urology Department, DUNEGO/Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR_S1165, Hôpital Saint-Louis-Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Coloby
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier René Dubos, Pontoise, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[Determination of the 120-day post prostatic biopsy mortality rate]. Prog Urol 2014; 24:427-32. [PMID: 24861682 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2013] [Revised: 11/06/2013] [Accepted: 11/11/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Concerning death-rates were reported following prostate biopsy but the lack of contexts in which event occurred makes it difficult to take any position. Therefore, we aimed to determine the 120-day post-biopsy mortality rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2000 and 2011, 8804 men underwent prostate biopsy in the hospice civils de Lyon. We studied retrospectively, the mortality rate after each of the 11,816 procedures. Biopsies imputability was assessed by examining all medical records. Dates of death were extracted from our local patient management database, which is updated trimestrially with death notifications from the French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies. RESULTS In our study 42 deaths occurred within 120days after 11,816 prostate biopsies (0.36%). Of the 42 records: 9 were lost to follow-up, 3 had no identifiable cause of death, 28 had an intercurrent event ruling out prostate biopsy as a cause of death. Only 2 deaths could be linked to biopsy. CONCLUSIONS We reported at most 2 deaths possibly related to prostate biopsy over 11,816 procedures (0.02%). We confirmed the fact that prostate biopsies can be lethal but this rare outcome should not be considered as an argument against prostate screening given the circumstances in which it occurs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lundström KJ, Drevin L, Carlsson S, Garmo H, Loeb S, Stattin P, Bill-Axelson A. Nationwide population based study of infections after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2014; 192:1116-22. [PMID: 24813343 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy is the gold standard for detecting prostate cancer but international reports suggest that increasing risks are associated with the procedure. We estimated incidence and risk factors for infection after prostate biopsy as well as 90-day mortality using a nationwide Swedish sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a population based study of 51,321 men from PCBaSe between 2006 and 2011. Primary outcome measures were dispensed prescriptions of antibiotics for urinary tract infection and hospitalization with a discharge diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for infection in men who underwent prostate biopsy. RESULTS During the 6 months before biopsy the background incidence of urinary tract infection was approximately 2%. Within 30 days after biopsy 6% of the men had a dispensed prescription for urinary tract antibiotics and 1% were hospitalized with infection. The strongest risk factors for an antibiotic prescription were prior infection (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.45-1.73), high Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.41) and diabetes (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17-1.49). Risk of an antibiotic prescription after biopsy decreased from 2006 to 2011 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.90) but the risk of hospital admission increased (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.58-2.94). No significant increase was observed in 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Severe infections with hospitalization after prostate biopsy are increasing in Sweden. The risk of post-biopsy infection is highest in men with a history of urinary tract infection and those with significant comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Johan Lundström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology, Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Linda Drevin
- Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hans Garmo
- Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology, Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Anna Bill-Axelson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anastasiadis A, Zapała L, Cordeiro E, Antoniewicz A, Dimitriadis G, De Reijke T. Complications of prostate biopsy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 13:829-37. [PMID: 23875661 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2013.811056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Biopsy of the prostate is a common procedure with minor complications that are usually self-limited. However, if one considers that millions of men undergo biopsy worldwide, one realizes that although complication rate is low, the number of patients suffering from biopsy complications should not be underestimated and can be a clinically relevant problem for healthcare professionals. In this review, the authors present diagnosis and management of postbiopsy of prostate complications. Bleeding is the most common complication observed after prostate biopsy, but the use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is not an absolute contraindication to prostate biopsy. Emerging resistance to ciprofloxacin is the most probable cause of the increasing risk of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. Even though extremely rare, fatal complications are possible and were described in case reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Anastasiadis
- Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Meibergdreef 9,1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pinsky PF, Parnes HL, Andriole G. Mortality and complications after prostate biopsy in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening (PLCO) trial. BJU Int 2013; 113:254-9. [PMID: 24053621 DOI: 10.1111/bju.12368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine mortality and morbidity after prostate biopsy in the intervention arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening (PLCO) trial. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Abstractors from the PLCO trial recorded the types and dates of diagnostic follow-up procedures after positive screens and documented the types and dates of resultant complications. Cancers and deaths among the participants were tracked. The mortality rate in the 120-day period after prostate biopsy was compared with a control rate of deaths in the 120-day period after a negative screen in men without biopsy. Multivariate analysis was performed to control for potential confounders, including age, comorbidities and smoking. Rates of any complication, infectious and non-infectious complications were computed among men with a negative biopsy. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the risk factors for complications. RESULTS Of the 37,345 men enrolled in the PLCO trial (intervention arm), 4861 had at least one biopsy after a positive screen and 28,661 had a negative screen and no biopsy. The 120-day mortality rate after biopsy was 0.95 (per 1000), compared with the control group rate of 1.8; the multivariate relative risk was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.2-1.1). Among 3706 negative biopsies, the rates (per 1000) of any complication, infectious and non-infections complications were 20.2, 7.8 and 13.0, respectively. A history of prostate enlargement or inflammation was significantly associated with higher rates of both infectious (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7) and non-infectious (OR = 2.2) complications. Black race was associated with a higher infectious complications rate (OR = 7.1) and repeat biopsy was associated with lower rates of non-infectious complications (OR = 0.3). CONCLUSION Mortality rates were not found to be higher after prostate biopsy in the PLCO trial and complications were relatively infrequent, with several risk factors identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul F Pinsky
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Head-to-Head Comparison of Prostate Health Index and Urinary PCA3 for Predicting Cancer at Initial or Repeat Biopsy. J Urol 2013; 190:496-501. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
17
|
Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2013; 64:876-92. [PMID: 23787356 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 676] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Accepted: 05/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate biopsy is commonly performed for cancer detection and management. The benefits and risks of prostate biopsy are germane to ongoing debates about prostate cancer screening and treatment. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of complications from prostate biopsy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase, supplemented with additional references. Articles were reviewed for data on the following complications: hematuria, rectal bleeding, hematospermia, infection, pain, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary retention, erectile dysfunction, and mortality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS After biopsy, hematuria and hematospermia are common but typically mild and self-limiting. Severe rectal bleeding is uncommon. Despite antimicrobial prophylaxis, infectious complications are increasing over time and are the most common reason for hospitalization after biopsy. Pain may occur at several stages of prostate biopsy and can be mitigated by anesthetic agents and anxiety-reduction techniques. Up to 25% of men have transient LUTS after biopsy, and <2% have frank urinary retention, with slightly higher rates reported after transperineal template biopsy. Biopsy-related mortality is rare. CONCLUSIONS Preparation for biopsy should include antimicrobial prophylaxis and pain management. Prostate biopsy is frequently associated with minor bleeding and urinary symptoms that usually do not require intervention. Infectious complications can be serious, requiring prompt management and continued work into preventative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Albrand G, Mottet N, Ruffion A, Fléchon A, Bensadoun RJ, Gigante M, Guy L, Mongiat-Artus P. [Prostate cancer in elderly subjects: how diagnosis should be made, why and how geriatric assessment should be implemented]. Prog Urol 2013; 22 Suppl 2:S55-63. [PMID: 23098791 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(12)70037-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Managing an elderly subject with prostate cancer brings into play the notion of likelihood of survival before any diagnostic or therapeutic decision can be made. The diagnostic strategy must be specified for each patient in accordance with the clinical presentation so as to determine whether prostate biopsies are indicated in this elderly population. To estimate the likelihood of survival, one must make use of geriatric assessment techniques comprising medical strategies ranging from screening for frailty to detailed geriatric evaluation for the most complex patients. The many tools available for estimating the likelihood of survival requires a critical review of their advantages and disadvantages in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Albrand
- Groupement de la Gériatrie des HCL, Hôpital Gériatrique Antoine-Charial, 69340 Francheville, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Boniol M, Boyle P, Autier P, Ruffion A, Perrin P. Reply: To PMID 22984785. BJU Int 2013; 111:E141-2. [PMID: 23551451 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2013.11397_8.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
20
|
|
21
|
Boniol M, Boyle P, Autier P, Ruffion A, Perrin P. Reply: Four-hundredfold overestimation of biopsy mortality. BJU Int 2013; 111:E17-8. [PMID: 23444934 DOI: 10.1111/bju.12020_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
22
|
Albertsen PC. Editorial comment: Critical role of prostate biopsy mortality in the number of years of life gained and lost within a prostate cancer screening programme. BJU Int 2012; 110:1653. [PMID: 22984891 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11522.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
23
|
Boniol M, Boyle P, Autier P, Ruffion A, Perrin P. Critical role of prostate biopsy mortality in the number of years of life gained and lost within a prostate cancer screening programme. BJU Int 2012; 110:1648-52. [PMID: 22984785 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11513.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Study Type--Therapy (data synthesis) Level of Evidence 2b. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The efficacy of prostate cancer screening using PSA testing is still being debated, with conflicting results in randomized trials. The study shows that, even using the hypothesis most favourable to prostate cancer screening with PSA, the net number of years of life does not favour screening. OBJECTIVE • To evaluate the impact of the implementation a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening programme using the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) results and taking into account the impact of prostate biopsy and over-treatment on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS • We used a model based on the number of years of life gained and lost owing to screening, using data reported in the ERSPC. • We conducted a critical evaluation of the ERSPC results and of the Swedish arm of the study. RESULTS • Accounting for biopsy-specific mortality and for over-treatment, the balance of number of years of life was negative in the ERSPC study, with an estimated loss of 3.6 years of life per avoided death. • The number of years of life becomes positive (real gain) only when fewer than 666 screened individuals are required to avoid one death. • We found that in the Swedish arm of the ERSPC there was a biopsy rate of 40% compared with 27% in the ERSPC overall. The over-treatment rate was also greater with 4.1% compared with 3.4% overall. • For the last 20 years, there has been a marked difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality between Sweden and the rest of Europe: in 2005, for the age group 65-74 the rate was 140 per 100,000 person years in Sweden and ~80 per 100,000 for the rest of Europe. CONCLUSION • Overall, PSA testing in Europe is associated with a loss in years of life and should thus not be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Boniol
- International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Re: Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare: S. Loeb, H. B. Carter, S. I. Berndt, W. Ricker and E. M. Schaeffer J Urol 2011; 186: 1830-1834. J Urol 2012; 188:677-8. [PMID: 22704450 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
25
|
To biopsy or not to biopsy--thou shall think twice. Eur Urol 2012; 61:1115-7; discussion 1117-8. [PMID: 22326676 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2012] [Accepted: 01/31/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
26
|
Rosario DJ, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Doble A, Goodwin L, Davis M, Catto JWF, Avery K, Neal DE, Hamdy FC. Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study. BMJ 2012; 344:d7894. [PMID: 22232535 PMCID: PMC3253765 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d7894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To measure the effect of the adverse events within 35 days of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy from the perspective of asymptomatic men having prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing; to assess early attitude to re-biopsy; to estimate healthcare resource use associated with adverse events due to biopsy; and to develop a classification scheme for reporting adverse events after prostate biopsy. DESIGN Prospective cohort study (Prostate Biopsy Effects: ProBE) nested within Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Participants Between 1999 and 2008, 227,000 community dwelling men aged 50-69 years were identified at 352 practices and invited to counselling about PSA testing. 111,148 attended a nurse led clinic in the community, and 10,297 with PSA concentrations of 3-20 ng/mL were offered biopsy within ProtecT. Between February 2006 and May 2008, 1147/1753 (65%) eligible men (mean age 62.1 years, mean PSA 5.4 ng/mL) having 10 core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy under antibiotic cover in the context of ProtecT were recruited to the ProBE study. OUTCOME MEASURES Purpose designed questionnaire administered at biopsy and 7 and 35 days after the procedure to measure frequency and effect of symptoms related to pain, infection, and bleeding; patients' attitude to repeat biopsy assessed immediately after biopsy and 7 days later; participants' healthcare resource use within 35 days of biopsy evaluated by questionnaire, telephone follow-up, and medical note review; each man's adverse event profile graded according to symptoms and healthcare use. RESULTS Pain was reported by 429/984 (43.6%), fever by 172/985 (17.5%), haematuria by 642/976 (65.8%), haematochezia by 356/967 (36.8%), and haemoejaculate by 605/653 (92.6%) men during the 35 days after biopsy. Fewer men rated these symptoms as a major/moderate problem-71/977 (7.3%) for pain, 54/981 (5.5%) for fever, 59/958 (6.2%) for haematuria, 24/951 (2.5%) for haematochezia, and 172/646 (26.6%) for haemoejaculate. Immediately after biopsy, 124/1142 (10.9%, 95% confidence interval 9.2 to 12.8) men reported that they would consider further biopsy a major or moderate problem: seven days after biopsy, this proportion had increased to 213/1085 (19.6%, 17.4% to 22.1%). A negative attitude to repeat biopsy was associated with unfavourable experience after the first biopsy, particularly pain at biopsy (odds ratio 8.2, P<0.001) and symptoms related to infection (7.9, P<0.001) and bleeding (4.2, P<0.001); differences were evident between centres (P<0.001). 119/1147 (10.4%, 8.7% to 12.3%) men reported consultation with a healthcare professional (usually their general practitioner), most commonly for infective symptoms. Complete data for all index symptoms at all time points were available in 851 participants. Symptoms and healthcare use could be used to grade these men as follows: grade 0 (no symptoms/contact) 18 (2.1%, 1.3% to 3.3%); grade 1 (minor problem/no contact) 550 (64.6%, 61.4% to 67.8%); grade 2 (moderate/major problem or contact) 271 (31.8%, 28.8% to 35.1%); grade 3 (hospital admission) 12 (1.4%, 0.8% to 2.4%); and grade 4 (death) 0. Grade of adverse event was associated with an unfavourable attitude to repeat biopsy (Kendall's τ-b ordinal by ordinal 0.29, P<0.001). CONCLUSION This study with a high response rate of 89% at 35 days in men undergoing biopsy in the context of a randomised controlled trial has shown that although prostate biopsy is well tolerated by most men, it is associated with significant symptoms in a minority and affects attitudes to repeat biopsy and primary care resource use. These findings will inform men who seek PSA testing for detection of prostate cancer and assist their physicians during counselling about the potential risks and effect of biopsy. Variability in the adverse event profile between centres suggests that patients' outcomes could be improved and healthcare use reduced with more effective administration of local anaesthetic and antibiotics. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Akin O, Yu C, Zakian KL, Udo K, Scardino PT, Eastham J, Kattan MW. Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer. BJU Int 2011; 109:1315-22. [PMID: 21933336 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10612.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Study Type--Prognosis (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? And what does the study add? Nomograms are available that combine clinical and biopsy findings to predict the probability of pathologically insignificant prostate cancer in patients with clinically low-risk disease. Based on data from patients with Gleason score 6, clinical stage ≤ T2a and PSA <20 ng/ml, our group developed the first nomogram models for predicting insignificant prostate cancer that incorporated clinical data, detailed biopsy data and findings from MRI or MRI/MRSI (BJU Int. 2007;99(4):786-93). When tested retrospectively, these MR models performed significantly better than standard clinical models with and without detailed biopsy data. We prospectively validated the previously published MR-based nomogram models in a population of patients with Gleason score 6, clinical stage ≤ T2a and PSA <10 ng/ml. Based on data from this same population, we also developed two new models for predicting insignificant prostate cancer that combine MR findings and clinical data without detailed biopsy data. Upon initial testing, the new MR models performed significantly better than a clinical model lacking detailed biopsy data. OBJECTIVES • To validate previously published nomograms for predicting insignificant prostate cancer (PCa) that incorporate clinical data, percentage of biopsy cores positive (%BC+) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or MRI/MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) results. • We also designed new nomogram models incorporating magnetic resonance results and clinical data without detailed biopsy data. Nomograms for predicting insignificant PCa can help physicians counsel patients with clinically low-risk disease who are choosing between active surveillance and definitive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS • In total, 181 low-risk PCa patients (clinical stage T1c-T2a, prostate-specific antigen level <10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score of 6) had MRI/MRSI before surgery. • For MRI and MRI/MRSI, the probability of insignificant PCa was recorded prospectively and independently by two radiologists on a scale from 0 (definitely insignificant) to 3 (definitely significant PCa). • Insignificant PCa was defined on surgical pathology. • There were four models incorporating MRI or MRI/MRSI and clinical data with and without %BC+ that were compared with a base clinical model without %BC and a more comprehensive clinical model with %BC+. Prediction accuracy was assessed using areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves. RESULTS • At pathology, 27% of patients had insignificant PCa, and the Gleason score was upgraded in 56.4% of patients. • For both readers, all magnetic resonance models performed significantly better than the base clinical model (P ≤ 0.05 for all) and similarly to the more comprehensive clinical model. CONCLUSIONS • Existing models incorporating magnetic resonance data, clinical data and %BC+ for predicting the probability of insignificant PCa were validated. • All MR-inclusive models performed significantly better than the base clinical model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chalasani V, Cool DW, Sherebrin S, Fenster A, Chin J, Izawa JI. Development and validation of a virtual reality transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy simulator. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5:19-26. [PMID: 21470507 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.09159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We present the design, reliability, face, content and construct validity testing of a virtual reality simulator for transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), which allows doctors-in-training to perform multiple different biopsy schemes. METHODS This biopsy system design uses a regular "end-firing" TRUS probe. Movements of the probe are tracked with a micro-magnetic sensor to dynamically slice through a phantom patient's 3D prostate volume to provide real-time continuous TRUS views. 3D TRUS scans during prostate biopsy clinics were recorded. Intrinsic reliability was assessed by comparing the left side of the prostate to the right side of the prostate for each biopsy. A content and face validity questionnaire was administered to 26 doctors to assess the simulator. Construct validity was assessed by comparing notes from experts and novices with regards to the time taken and the accuracy of each biopsy. RESULTS Imaging data from 50 patients were integrated into the simulator. The completed VR TRUS simulator uses real patient images, and is able to provide simulation for 50 cases, with a haptic interface that uses a standard TRUS probe and biopsy needle. Intrinsic reliability was successfully demonstrated by comparing results from the left and right sides of the prostate. Face and content validity respondents noted the realism of the simulator, and its appropriateness as a teaching model. The simulator was able to distinguish between experts and novices during construct validity testing. CONCLUSIONS A virtual reality TRUS simulator has successfully been created. It has promising face, content and construct validity results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venu Chalasani
- Departments of Surgery & Oncology, Divisions of Urology & Surgical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Carlsson SV, Holmberg E, Moss SM, Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, Tammela TL, Aus G, Auvinen AP, Hugosson J. No excess mortality after prostate biopsy: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int 2010; 107:1912-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09712.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
30
|
Neuzillet Y. L’évaluation des morbidités compétitives et des scores d’évaluation de la morbidité compétitive. Prog Urol 2009; 19 Suppl 3:S80-6. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(09)73349-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
31
|
Cloutier V, Capitanio U, Zini L, Perrotte P, Jeldres C, Shariat SF, Arjane P, Patard JJ, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Thirty-day mortality after nephrectomy: clinical implications for informed consent. Eur Urol 2008; 56:998-1003. [PMID: 19054604 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2008] [Accepted: 11/14/2008] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The existing literature suggests that the surgical mortality (SM) observed with nephrectomy for localised disease varies from 0.6% to 3.6%. OBJECTIVE To examine age- and stage-specific 30-d mortality (TDM) rates after partial or radical nephrectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We relied on 24535 assessable patients from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MEASUREMENTS In 12283 patients, logistic regression models were used to develop a tool for pretreatment prediction of the probability of TDM according to individual patient and tumour characteristics. External validation was performed on 12252 patients. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In the entire cohort of 24535 patients, 219 deaths occurred during the initial 30 d after nephrectomy (0.9% TDM rate). TDM increased with age (≤49 yr: 0.5% vs 50-59 yr: 0.7% vs 60-69 yr: 0.9% vs 70-79 yr: 1.2% vs ≥80 yr: 2.0%; χ(2) trend p<0.001) and stage (0.3% for T1-2N0M0 vs 1.3% for T3-4N0-2M0 vs 4.2% for T1-4N0-2M1; χ2 trend p=<0.001). TDM decreased in more recent years (1988-1993: 1.3% vs 1994-1998: 0.9% vs 1999-2002: 0.7% vs 2003-2004: 0.6%; χ2 trend p<0.001) and was lower after partial versus radical nephrectomy (RN) (0.4% vs 0.9%; p=0.008). Only age (p<0.001) and stage (p<0.001) achieved independent predictor status. The look-up table that relied on the regression coefficients of age and stage reached 79.4% accuracy in the external validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Age and stage are the foremost determinants of TDM after nephrectomy. Our model provides individual probabilities of TDM after nephrectomy, and its use should be highly encouraged during informed consent prior to planned nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Cloutier
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Department of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|