The HPV test has similar sensitivity but more overdiagnosis than the Pap test--a randomised health services study on cervical cancer screening in Finland

Similar effectiveness with primary HPV and cytology screening - Long-term follow-up of randomized cervical cancer screening trial

BACKGROUND

Long-term effects of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality are still missing. We conducted a long-term follow-up of the Finnish randomized HPV screening trial, the first HPV screening trial run within the routine screening program, to assess these measures.

METHODS

During 2003-2008, over 236,000 individuals were randomized (1:1) to HPV and cytology screening arms in Southern Finland. To compare the study arms, we calculated the cervical cancer incidence and mortality rate ratios using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

During a total of 3.5 million person-years of follow-up, we observed 129 cervical cancers and 32 cervical cancer deaths in the cytology arm, 139 cervical cancers and 32 cervical cancer deaths in the HPV arm. Compared to the cytology arm, in the HPV arm, the incidence rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI 0.85-1.37), and the mortality rate ratio was 1.01 (95% CI 0.61-1.64).

CONCLUSIONS

We studied the effects of HPV screening on both cervical cancer incidence and mortality for the first time in a setting with an already well-established, high-quality cytology screening program. In this kind of setting with a low incidence of cervical cancer, HPV and cytology screening showed similar effectiveness. HPV screening provides, however, an objective, validated test system and enables self-sampling which can improve screening coverage. More attention is needed yet to ensure the balance between the harms and benefits of HPV screening.

The Clinical Utility of Extended High-Risk HPV Genotyping in Women With ASC-US Cytology

OBJECTIVES

Extended testing for high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes (hrHPVGTs) is increasingly investigated for risk stratification in cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

Age and hrHPVGT results from 16,993 women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology between November 2015 and August 2021 were studied and correlated with available histopathologic findings within 6 months.

RESULTS

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive rate was 66.9% in women with ASC-US cytology, and the most prevalent genotypes were HPV 52 (20.9%), 16 (15.7%), and 58 (12.8%). Single hrHPV genotypes and multiple HPV genotypes were detected in 77.2% and 22.8% of women with hrHPV-positive results. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more (CIN2+) severe lesions were identified in 19.5% of women with hrHPV-positive ASC-US. The greatest risk for CIN2+ was found in single genotype infections with HPV 16 (33.1%), followed by women with multiple genotype infections, including HPV 16 (32.7%), 82 (30.8%), and 31 (30.0%). hrHPVGT testing for genotypes 16, 31, 35, 45, 82, 58, 33, 52, and 18 was identified in 91.9% (965/1,050) of CIN2+ cases, with 88.9% sensitivity, 43.2% specificity, positive predictive value of 23.9%, and negative predictive value of 95.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended hrHPV genotyping for women with ASC-US cytology could identify those hrHPV genotypes (HPV 16, 31, 35, 45, 82, 58, 33, 52, 18) associated with higher risk of CIN2+ and allows for refined risk stratification of women being screened.

The Diagnosis of Cervical Dysplasia in a University Hospital Using Pap Smear and Colposcopy in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A Correlational Study

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic performance of Pap smear screening with or without human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and colposcopy in detecting preinvasive lesions of the cervix among women with reference to histopathological findings.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective study in a tertiary care center of the clinical and pathological records of women with evocative symptomatology. The diagnostic performance of Pap smear screening and colposcopy was analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of Pap smear screening and colposcopy in detecting preinvasive lesions of the cervix were calculated in 388 patients.

Results

The mean age was 45.12 years, and the most frequent gynecological symptoms included abnormal bleeding (17.2%) and postcoital bleeding (10.9%). Histopathology showed abnormal results in 26.5% of the 388 patients, including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN 1; 20.4%), CIN 2 (2.8%), CIN 3 (1.3%), and SCC (1.3%). Both Pap smear screening and colposcopy were highly sensitive in detecting CIN 1+ (94.2%vs.93.2%, respectively) and CIN 2+ (100.0% vs.95.8%, respectively) intraepithelial lesions; however, Pap smears had very low specificity in detecting both CIN 1+ (8.1% vs.73.7%, respectively) and CIN 2+ (8.0% vs. 59.3%, respectively) compared with colposcopy. When combined with HPV status, the specificity of Pap smear increased considerably.

Conclusion

It has become a high priority to improve the efficiency of cervical cancer (CC) screening programs by optimizing the practice of Pap smear screening, increasing the test specificity, and implementing systematic cytology-HPV co-testing.

Scrutinizing high-risk patients from ASC-US cytology via a deep learning model

BACKGROUND

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) is the most frequent but ambiguous abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) interpretation and is generally triaged by high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing before colposcopy. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based triage system to predict ASC-US cytology for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ lesions (CIN2+).

METHODS

More than 60,000 images were used to train this proposed deep learning-based ASC-US triage system, where both cell-level and slide-level information were extracted. In total, 1967 consecutive ASC-US Paps from 2017 to 2019 were included in this study. Histological follow-ups were retrieved to compare the triage performance between the AI system and hrHPV in 622 patients with simultaneous hrHPV testing.

RESULTS

In the triage of women with ASC-US cytology for CIN2+, our system attained equivalent sensitivity (92.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 75.0%-98.8%) and higher specificity (49.7%; 95% CI, 45.6%-53.8%) than hrHPV testing (sensitivity: 89.3%; 95% CI, 70.6%-97.2%; specificity: 34.3%; 95% CI, 30.6%-38.3%) without requiring additional patient examination or testing. Additionally, the independence of this system from hrHPV testing (κ = 0.138) indicated that these 2 different methods could be used to triage ASC-US as an alternative way.

CONCLUSION

This de novo deep learning-based system can triage ASC-US cytology for CIN2+ with a performance superior to hrHPV testing and without incurring additional expenses.

Organized primary human papillomavirus-based cervical screening: A randomized healthcare policy trial

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in the research setting have demonstrated that primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening results in greater protection against cervical cancer compared with cytology, but evidence from real-life implementation was missing. To evaluate the effectiveness of HPV-based cervical screening within a real-life screening program, the organized, population-based cervical screening program in the capital region of Sweden offered either HPV- or cytology-based screening in a randomized manner through a randomized healthcare policy (RHP).

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A total of 395,725 women aged 30 to 64 years that were invited for their routine cervical screening visit were randomized without blinding to either cytology-based screening with HPV triage (n = 183,309) or HPV-based screening, with cytology triage (n = 212,416 women) between September 1, 2014 and September 30, 2016 and follow-up through June 30, 2017. The main outcome was non-inferior detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). Secondary outcomes included superiority in CIN2+ detection, screening attendance, and referral to histology. In total, 120,240 had a cervical screening sample on record in the study period in the HPV arm and 99,340 in the cytology arm and were followed for the outcomes of interest. In per-protocol (PP) analyses, the detection rate of CIN2+ was 1.03% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.10) in the HPV arm and 0.93% (0.87 to 0.99) in the cytology arm (p for non-inferiority <0.0001; odds ratio (OR) 1.11 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.22)). There were 46 cervical cancers detected in the HPV arm (0.04% (0.03 to 0.06)) and 48 cancers detected in the cytology arm (0.05% (0.04 to 0.07)) (p for non-inferiority <0.0001; OR 0.79 (0.53 to 1.18)). Intention-to-screen (ITS) analyses found few differences. In the HPV arm, there was a modestly increased attendance after new invitations (68.56% (68.31 to 68.80) vs. 67.71% (67.43 to 67.98); OR 1.02 (1.00 to 1.03)) and increased rate of referral with completed biopsy (3.89% (3.79 to 4.00) vs. 3.53% (3.42 to 3.65); OR 1.10 (1.05 to 1.15)). The main limitations of this analysis are that only the baseline results are presented, and there was an imbalance in invitations between the study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that a real-life RHP of primary HPV-based screening was acceptable and effective when evaluated against cytology-based screening, as indicated by comparable participation, referral, and detection rates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01511328.

Contributions of Liquid-Based (Papanicolaou) Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cotesting for Detection of Cervical Cancer and Precancer in the United States

Objectives

Given the recent debate challenging the contribution of cytology in cervical screening, we evaluated results of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in cotesting preceding cervical cancer (CxCa) and precancer diagnoses in a national, heterogeneous population.

Methods

We assessed the results of cotesting, performed by Quest Diagnostics, in 13,633,071 women 30 years and older, tested 2010 to 2018. Cotest results preceding CxCa or precancer diagnoses were analyzed and stratified by histopathology.

Results

Among all screening results, 1,615 cotests preceded 1,259 CxCa diagnoses, and 11,164 cotests preceded 8,048 cervical precancer diagnoses. More women who were subsequently diagnosed with CxCa within 1 year were identified by the LBC result than by the HPV result (85.1%, 1,015/1,193 vs 77.5%, 925/1,193). Among all women with CxCa, the overall rate of nondetection was 13.1% (212/1,615) for cotesting results (LBC negative/HPV negative) and this rate increased substantially when testing exceeded 12 months compared to within 1 year prediagnosis of either CxCa or precancer.

Conclusions

Analysis of 9-year cotest results from a national reference laboratory confirms the value of LBC element in cotesting. This supports that LBC/HPV cotesting enhances screening for the identification of CxCa in women 30 years and older, more so than LBC or HPV alone within cotesting.

Personalized Medicine and Cervical Screening: Development of Individualized Quantitative Risk Assessments for Cervical Adenocarcinoma and Adenocarcinoma in situ

INTRODUCTION

Cervical screening has decreased the incidence of cervical carcinoma around the world primarily by preventing cervical squamous carcinoma, with significantly less measurable protective benefits in prevention of cervical adenocarcinoma. In this study, we apply Bayesian modeling of cervical clinical, screening, and biopsy data from a large integrated health system to explore the feasibility of calculating personalized risk assessments on screened system patients for subsequent histopathologic diagnoses of invasive cervical adenocarcinoma (AdCa) or cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diagnoses of cervical AIS or AdCa rendered between 2005 and 2018 were identified in our large health system database with 1,053,713 cytology results, 354,843 high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) test results, and 99,012 cervical histopathologic results. Using our continuously updated Bayesian cervical cancer screening model which includes clinical data, cervical screening results, and cervical biopsy results, we projected quantitative estimates of patients' 5-year cumulative risk for cervical AIS or AdCa.

RESULTS

161 patients were identified with AIS (ages 17-75, mean 37 years), and 99 patients had diagnoses of cervical AdCa (ages 26-91, mean 48 years). Quantitative Bayesian 5-year cumulative risk projections for diagnoses of cervical AdCa or AIS in patients with different cervical screening test and biopsy histories were determined. The highest patient risk projections for subsequent cervical AdCa and/or AIS histopathologic diagnoses were associated with prior cervical screening test results of HPV-positive atypical glandular cells. Prior squamous cytologic abnormalities were associated with lower risk estimates. Prior histopathologic diagnoses of squamous abnormalities also influenced quantitative risk. A prior histopathologic diagnosis of AIS was associated with a very low risk of subsequent AdCa, consistent with effective excisional treatment. AdCa risk was greatest in women aged 30-65 years with prior CIN3 biopsy results, whereas AIS risk was greatest in women <30.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of cervical AdCa in screened patients remains a major challenge for cervical screening. Individualized risk projections for cervical glandular neoplasia reflecting patient age, prior cervical screening test results, and prior cervical biopsy history are feasible using Bayesian modeling of health system data.

Are CIN3 risk or CIN3+ risk measures reliable surrogates for invasive cervical cancer risk?

•Discuss ASCCP guideline. •CIN3 reliable surrogates for cervical cancer? •The Pittsburgh Cervical Cancer Screening Model.

Surface optimization of gold nanoparticle mass tags for the sensitive detection of protein biomarkers via immuno-capture LI-MS

HPV-induced cervical cancer is one of the most lethal cancers. Therefore, the development of a reliable and accurate method for the early diagnosis of HPV infections is highly important. Here, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were utilized as mass tags in an immuno-capture LI-MS assay for the detection of HPV marker proteins. Through the optimization of the amount of antibodies and surface charges on AuNPs, high antigen detection efficiency with minimal non-specific binding was achieved. With optimized antibody-conjugated AuNPs, low attomole amount of HPV proteins in HeLa cell lysate was quantified.

Clinical performance of the aptima HPV assay in 4196 women with positive high-risk HPV and ASC-US cytology: A large women hospital experience

BACKGROUND

Despite Aptima assay as the latest US Food Drug Administration (FDA)-approved high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test has been implemented as an adjunct in cervical cancer screening for years, histological follow-up data remain limited with respect to its performance in women with ASC-US Pap tests and positive hrHPV results.

METHODS

Cases with results of ASC-US cytology and positive hrHPV by Aptima assay during the period 06/ 2015-02/2017 were retrieved from archived pathology reports. Immediate histological follow-up results were analyzed within 6 months interval after cotesting.

RESULTS

Among 4196 women with ASC-US Pap tests and positive hrHPV, 51.1% of them had the immediate histological follow-up within 6 months. With positive Aptima hrHPV as the adjunct, 46.5% (95%CI 46.2-46.8) of ASC-US women were found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 1 (CIN1); 8.8% (95%CI 8.1-9.5) women were detected CIN2+ lesion including eight adenocarcinoma in-situ (AIS)s. CIN2+ detection rates were highest in women under 25 (15.4%, n = 65), when comparison with different age cutoffs, younger age women had higher CIN2+ lesion detection rate than that in older group (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

This is by far one of the largest retrospective studies to analyze the histological follow-up results of ASC-US women with positive hrHPV tested by Aptima hrHPV mRNA assay. The results indicated that younger women with ASC-US and positive hrHPV testing have highest risk of developing high grade CIN lesions as compared to the older women. Lastly, with positive HPV as the adjunct, 55.3% (1186/2145) of ASC-US women will result in the positive finding on histological follow-up.

Outcomes of prior cervical cytology and HR-HPV testing in women subsequently diagnosed with CIN1, CIN2/3, and invasive cervical cancer: a 4-year routine clinical experience after implementation of systematic training and quality control programs

BACKGROUND

In 2013, Jinan KingMed Diagnostics (JKD) first established a systematic cervical cytology training and quality control (QC) program in Shandong Province, China. We compared the efficacy of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) detection, cytology, and their combination in routine clinical practice after the implementation of the training and QC program to identify the optimal first-line screening method in this region.

METHODS

The data of patients histologically diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, CIN2/3, and invasive cervical cancer (ICC) between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrieved from the JKD database. Cytology and/or HR-HPV testing results within 3 months preceding the CIN1 diagnoses and 6 months preceding the CIN2/3 and ICC diagnoses were analyzed.

RESULTS

Prior screening data were available for 1829 CIN1 patients, 2309 CIN2/3 patients, and 680 ICC patients. Cytology alone and HR-HPV testing alone had similar rates of positive results for CIN2/3 (97.2% [854/879] vs. 95.4% [864/906], P = 0.105) and ICC detection (89.1% [205/230] vs. 92.7% [204/220], P = 0.185). Compared with either method alone, co-testing slightly increased the screening sensitivity for CIN2/3 (99.8% [523/524], all P < 0.001) and ICC (99.6% [229/230], all P < 0.001) detection. In the CIN1 group, cervical cytology alone (92.9% [520/560]) was more sensitive than HR-HPV testing alone (79.9% [570/713], P < 0.001), and co-testing (95.3% [530/556]) did not significantly improve the screening sensitivity (P = 0.105).

CONCLUSIONS

After the implementation of a systematic training and QC program, both cytology and HR-HPV testing may be adopted for primary cervical cancer screening in Shandong Province.

Performance and acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus testing among women living with HIV

•

Women living with HIV are under-screened for cervical cancer.

•

Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing at home could become a more efficient strategy in the post-COVID-19 era.

•

Self-collected HPV testing has good sensitivity and moderate specificity among women living with HIV.

•

Self-sampling is highly accepted by women.

•

Improvement in self-sampling techniques is needed due to possibly inadequate sample volume.

Objective

To assess the validity, reliability, and acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus (HPV) tests in women living with HIV (WLHIV) in the United States.

Methods

WLHIV ≥30 years of age underwent self-collected (clinic and home) and clinician-collected HPV tests. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed using the clinician-collected HPV tests as the comparator. The unweighted kappa statistic was used to evaluate the validity and reliability of self-collected HPV testing, and the level of agreement between the clinician-collected mRNA test and a DNA test that was used for routine care. A 13-question survey was used to assess acceptability.

Results

Among the 70 participants, the median age was 50 years, 75% had an undetectable HIV RNA, and 11% had a CD4 count of <200 cells/μl. Nearly 63% had at least one positive HPV test. The sensitivity and specificity of the self-collected HPV test were 84.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 65.1–95.6%) and 62.9% (95% CI 44.9–78.5%), respectively (κ = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2–0.7). The agreement between the two self-collected tests was good (κ = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5–1.0). There was good agreement between clinician-collected mRNA tests and DNA tests (κ = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7–1.0). Self-collection was highly acceptable.

Conclusions

Among WLHIV, self-collected HPV tests had good sensitivity and moderate specificity compared to clinician-collected HPV tests. The reliability between self-collected testing locations was good. Self-collected HPV testing had high acceptability.

HPV detection rates and histopathologic follow-up of patients with HSIL cytology in a large academic women's hospital laboratory

INTRODUCTION

High risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been proposed as a possible replacement for Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology for cervical screening. The aim of the present study was to assess the hrHPV detection rates using 3 available Food and Drug Administration-approved HPV assays in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology results and to correlate the cervical screening test results with the immediate histopathologic findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases with positive HSIL ThinPrep cytology findings, concurrent hrHPV testing results, and histopathologic follow-up results obtained within 6 months of the Pap/HPV co-testing were identified from July 2010 to April 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 943 HSIL Pap tests were identified with adjunctive hrHPV co-testing, and hrHPV was detected in 883 (93.6%) of these 943 cases. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ≥2 (CIN2+) lesions were diagnosed in 71.5% of patients, including 3.2% with invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In all hrHPV testing platforms, the detection rate for CIN2+ was significantly greater for the patients with positive HPV testing (72.7%) than for those with negative HPV testing (53.4%). However, CIN2+ lesions, including 3 cases of SCC, were found in 24 of 45 women (53.4%) with HSIL Pap and negative HPV testing results.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of CIN2+ histopathologic findings was significantly greater for patients with hrHPV-positive HSIL results. However, a subset of patients with HPV-negative HSIL results were found to have CIN2+ lesions, including SCC. The long-term effects of primary HPV screening on cervical cancer incidence, stage, and prognosis remain uncertain.

Exploring the dynamics and interplay of human papillomavirus and cervical tumorigenesis by integrating biological data into a mathematical model

Background

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common tumor in women worldwide, mostly resulting from high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) with persistent infection.

Results

The present discoveries are comprised of the following: (i) A total of 16.64% of the individuals were positive for HR-HPV infection, with 13.04% having a single HR-HPV type and 3.60% having multiple HR-HPV types. (ii) Cluster analysis showed that the infection rate trends of HPV31 and HPV33 in all infections as well as HPV33 and HPV35 in single infections in precancerous stages were very similar. (iii) The single/multiple infection proportions of HR-HPV demonstrated a trend that the multiple infections rates of HR-HPV increased as the disease developed.

Conclusions

The HR-HPV prevalence in outpatients was 16.64%, and the predominant HR-HPV types in the study were HPV52, HPV58 and HPV16. HR-HPV subtypes with common biological properties had similar infection rate trends in precancerous stages. Especially, as the disease development of precancer evolved, defense against HPV infection broke, meanwhile, the potential of more HPV infection increased, which resulted in increase of multiple infections of HPV.

Individualized Bayesian Risk Assessment for Cervical Squamous Neoplasia

Background:

Cervical screening could potentially be improved by better stratifying individual risk for the development of cervical cancer or precancer, possibly even allowing follow-up of individual patients differently than proposed under current guidelines that focus primarily on recent screening test results. We explore the use of a Bayesian decision science model to quantitatively stratify individual risk for the development of cervical squamous neoplasia.

Materials and Methods:

We previously developed a dynamic multivariate Bayesian network model that uses cervical screening and histopathologic data collected over 13 years in our system to quantitatively estimate the risk of individuals for the development of cervical precancer or invasive cervical cancer. The database includes 1,126,048 liquid-based cytology test results belonging to 389,929 women. From-the-vial, high risk human papilloma virus (HPV) test results and follow-up gynecological surgical procedures were available on 33.6% and 12% of these results (378,896 and 134,727), respectively.

Results:

Historical data impacted 5-year cumulative risk for both histopathologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN3) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) diagnoses. The risk was highest in patients with prior high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology results. Persistent abnormal cervical screening test results, either cytologic or HPV results, were associated with variable increasing risk for squamous neoplasia. Risk also increased with prior histopathologic diagnoses of precancer, including CIN2, CIN3, and adenocarcinoma in situ.

Conclusions:

Bayesian modeling allows for individualized quantitative risk assessments of system patients for histopathologic diagnoses of significant cervical squamous neoplasia, including very rare outcomes such as SCC.

Identification of Circulating MicroRNAs as a Promising Diagnostic Biomarker for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Early Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common female malignant tumors. And cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is the precancerous lesion of CC, which can progress to invasive CC. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been found to be potential diagnostic biomarkers for CIN or CC. However, recently, the lack of sufficient studies about the diagnostic value of miRNAs for CIN made it challenging to separately investigate the diagnostic efficacy of miRNAs for CIN. Likewise, the conclusions among those studies were discordant. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis, aimed at evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of miRNAs for CIN and CC patients.

Methods

Literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and other diagnostic parameters were calculated through Stata 14.0 software. Furthermore, subgroup analyses and metaregression analysis were conducted to explore the main sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Ten articles covering 50 studies were eligible, which included 5,908 patients and 4,819 healthy individuals. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), 5.9 (95% CI, 4.5-7.7), 0.22 (95% CI, 0.17-0.28), 27 (95% CI, 17-44), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. Additionally, the ethnicity and internal reference were the main sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Circulating miRNAs can be a promising noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for CIN and early CC, especially miR-9 and miR-205, which need to be verified by large-scale studies.

Utility of Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Korea

(1) Background: Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korean women. This study was performed to discover the utility of HPV (Human Papillomavirus) testing in screening of cervical lesions and to provide the prevalence of HPV and the genotype distribution in a single center of Korea. (2) Methods: A total of 15,141 women who underwent both HPV testing and cervical cytology were enrolled in this retrospective medical record review study. (3) Results: HPV testing showed higher sensitivity than cytology for the detection of histological high-grade squamous lesions. Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing varied depending on the method used. The BD Onclarity™ HPV assay had higher sensitivity (90%) than the MyHPV CHIP™ kit (all types of HPV: 82%; high-risk HPV: 76%) for high-grade squamous lesions. A combination of MyHPV CHIP™ and cytology detected 90.9% (30/33) of histological high-grade squamous lesions. A combination of BD Onclarity™ HPV assay and cytology detected 96.55% (84/87) of histological high-grade squamous lesions. In addition, HPV prevalence and genotype distribution were different depending on the HPV testing method used. (4) Conclusion: HPV testing showed higher sensitivity than cytology, but the sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing had variation depending on the method used.

The impact of primary HPV screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in New Zealand

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to evaluate the impact on the incidence of cervical cancer in New Zealand of 5-yearly human papillomavirus (HPV) primary screening compared with 3-yearly cytology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unbiased estimates of the screening test sensitivity of HPV and cytology screening, and screening coverage, were used to calculate the reduction in cervical cancer incidence obtained by current cytology screening and the new HPV screening policy.

RESULTS

HPV screening in New Zealand is predicted to increase the incidence of cervical cancer in women being screened by 81.7% (95% CI: 38.9%-124.7%). The overall increase in the population incidence of cervical cancer in New Zealand was estimated to be 46.7% (95% CI 42.6%-50.8%), leading to about 57 more women developing cervical cancer each year.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that lengthening the screening interval concurrently with changing to HPV testing may reduce the protection from invasive cervical cancer for women. Women in New Zealand should continue to be screened by cytology every 3 years. Changes to screening policy should be carefully designed so that changes in screening effectiveness can be accurately measured.

HPV status in women with high-grade dysplasia on cervical biopsy and preceding negative HPV tests

INTRODUCTION

A considerable number of patients with high-grade cervical lesions have undergone preceding human papillomavirus (HPV) tests with negative results. In the present study, we attempted to elucidate the factors potentially contributing to the findings by testing biopsied samples from these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 1654 women with HPV testing and follow-up cervicovaginal biopsies from March 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, 21 of 252 women (8.3%) with biopsy-confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse had had negative results from preceding high-risk (hr)HPV tests. The corresponding paraffin blocks were tested for HPV using the Cobas 4800 system, a DNA microarray against 40 HPV genotypes, and DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

HPV was detected in 20 (95%) of the 21 biopsies with HSIL or worse, including HPV16/18 in 4, non-16/18 hrHPV in 10, and non-hrHPV in 6. HPV59 and HPV45 were 2.2 times more frequently detected than HPV16/18 in these samples. One sample was negative for all 3 tests (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has demonstrated that 8.3% of women with biopsy-confirmed HSIL or worse had preceding test results that were negative for hrHPV. The vast majority of the biopsied samples had detectable HPV, primarily hrHPV genotypes (67%) with HPV59 and HPV45 predominance. This genotypic prevalence pattern was markedly different from those reported in the general population. Non-hrHPV genotypes contributed to 29% of the cases, and HPV-negative cases were rare. In addition to the limited Cobas testing panel and rare possible HPV-negative HSIL or worse, other possible contributing factors to the discrepancy include cytologic sampling, interference material, technical errors, and reduced L1 gene expression in high-grade lesions.

Role of Ancillary Techniques in Cervical Biopsy and Endocervical Curettage Specimens as Follow-Up to Papanicolaou Test Results Indicating a Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

The Papanicolaou (PAP) test is widely used to screen for cervical cancer. All high-grade lesions such as atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, identified on a PAP test should be followed-up by a confirmatory cervical biopsy. In this review, we discuss the challenges in interpreting cervical tissue specimens and the various ancillary techniques used in the evaluation of cervical dysplasia. Ancillary studies include deeper levels, p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and, importantly, cyto-histologic correlation. Of these, p16 IHC is consistently sensitive and specific for detecting HSIL. HPV RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) is a newer technique with excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting virally infected cells and it may be more broadly applicable to both low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing

Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequently occurring cancer in women around the world and can affect them during their reproductive years. Since the development of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test, screening has been essential in identifying cervical cancer at a treatable stage. With the identification of the human papillomavirus (HPV) as the causative agent of essentially all cervical cancer cases, HPV molecular screening tests and HPV vaccines for primary prevention against the virus have been developed. Accordingly, comparative studies were designed to assess the performance of cervical cancer screening methods in order to devise the best screening strategy possible. This review critically assesses the current cervical cancer screening methods as well as the implementation of HPV vaccination in Europe. The most recent European Guidelines and recommendations for organized population-based programs with HPV testing as the primary screening method are also presented. Lastly, the current landscape of cervical cancer screening programs is assessed for both European Union member states and some associated countries, in regard to the transition towards population-based screening programs with primary HPV testing.

HPV screening, invasive cervical cancer and screening policy in Australia

INTRODUCTION

The new cervical screening policy in Australia replaces 2-yearly cytology with 5-yearly human papillomavirus (HPV) screening. However, 2 of 5 randomized trials that have reported the number of women with cervical cancer found the incidence rate of invasive cervical cancer during follow-up to be higher for HPV compared with cytology screening. Therefore, we have estimated the possible impact of the new policy on cervical cancer incidence in Australia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Available estimates of the relative protection from cytology screening, estimates of the coverage of the 2-yearly cytology screening policy of the Australian national cervical screening program, and estimates of screening test sensitivity were used to estimate the change in the incidence of cervical cancer from the introduction of the new policy.

RESULTS

HPV screening 5-yearly was predicted to increase the annual incidence of cervical cancer in women screened to 121% (95% CI: 73%-169%) of current incidence after 10 years. The overall incidence of cervical cancer in Australia was predicted to increase by 39.2% (95% CI: 34.0%-44.4%) with an additional 222 women developing cervical cancer each year after 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of the screening sensitivity of HPV testing and cervical cytology suggest the introduction of 5-yearly HPV primary screening may increase the incidence cervical cancer in Australia.

Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of Human Papillomavirus in Invasive Cervical Cancer, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Asymptomatic Women in Southeast China

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among women and it is caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). High variation has been reported in the attribution of specific HPV genotypes to cervical neoplasia among various geographic regions. For effective control of cervical cancer through HPV vaccination, it is essential to estimate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination, to monitor the potential transition into other HPV genotypes, and to understand the distribution of specific HPV genotypes across a specific geographic region. In this study, the distribution of HPV genotypes was investigated in southeast China, from 2011 to 2016. The 12,816 cervical swabs collected from women (age 18–78 years, median 43.6 years) outpatients were analyzed. HPV prevalence among 12,816 cervical swabs analyzed was 22.3% (2,856/12,816). Among these positive cases, 2,216 had only one HPV genotype while 640 had multiple HPV genotypes. The cases with multiple types revealed 23 different HPV genotypes with the five most prevalent being HPV18 (18.2%), HPV52 (14.1%), HPV16 (11.9%), HPV58 (10.6%), and HPV33 (5.5%). The rates of HPV infection in patients with cervical inflammation, CIN-1, CIN-2, CIN-3, squamous carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma were 38.4%, 80.5%, 82.6%, 92.3%, 97.5%, and 93.4%, respectively. Four HPV genotypes, HPV18, HPV16, HPV52, and HPV58, were more prevalent in patients with CIN-2-CIN-3 and invasive cervical cancer. A comparison of HPV genotypes attribution to cervical cancer between southeast China and global incidences revealed distinct differences. Due to this unique prevalence, it is essential to streamline the vaccination development protocol prior to administering vaccines based on global data.

Enhanced Detection of Cervical Cancer and Precancer Through Use of Imaged Liquid-Based Cytology in Routine Cytology and HPV Cotesting

OBJECTIVES

Cervical screening strives to prevent cervical cancer (CxCa), minimizing morbidity and mortality. Most large US reports on cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) cotesting of women aged 30 years and older are from one laboratory, which used conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears from 2003 to 2009.

METHODS

We quantified detection of CxCa and precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3/adenocarcinoma in situ [CIN3/AIS]) in 300,800 cotests at Magee Womens Hospital since 2005. Screening histories preceding CxCa and CIN3/AIS diagnoses were examined to assess the contribution of cytology and HPV testing. Cotesting utilized Food and Drug Administration-approved imaged liquid-based cytology (LBC) and from-the-vial HPV tests.

RESULTS

LBC identified more women subsequently diagnosed with CxCa and CIN3/AIS than HPV testing. HPV-negative/cytology-positive results preceded 13.1% of CxCa and 7.2% of CIN3/AIS diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

LBC enhanced cotesting detection of CxCa and CIN3/AIS to a greater extent than previously reported with conventional Pap smear and HPV cotesting.

Extended Human Papillomavirus Genotype Distribution and Cervical Cytology Results in a Large Cohort of Chinese Women With Invasive Cervical Cancers and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

OBJECTIVES

To study the human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution of cervical cancer (CxCa) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 (CIN2/3) in China and to evaluate cotesting of HPV and cytology in CxCa screening.

METHODS

Patients with histopathologic CxCa and CIN 2/3 diagnoses reported between January 2012 and June 2016 and extended HPV genotype testing in the prior 6 months were documented in the institute. Available prior Papanicolaou (Pap) test results were also documented. Extended HPV genotype testing was performed using two China Food and Drug Administration-approved HPV tests.

RESULTS

CxCa and CIN 2/3 diagnoses and recent prior HPV test results were documented in 370 CxCa cases and 2774 CIN 2/3 cases. The high-risk (hr) HPV-positive rate was 88.4% for CxCa and 90.1% for CIN 2/3. Among 327 HPV-positive CxCa cases, the most common HPV types were HPV 16 (70.3%), 18 (7.0%), 58 (5.7%), 33 (4.1%), and 53 and 59 (1.9% each). Among 2499 hrHPV-positive CIN 2/3 cases, the most common HPV types were HPV 16 (53.3%), 58 (21.4%), 52 (11%), 33 (10.6%), and 18 (5.1%). 161 CxCa cases and 1094 CIN 2/3 cases also had available prior cotest results. Among cotested cases hrHPV-negative results were reported in 12.4% of CxCa and 10.1% of CIN 2/3 cases compared to cytology-negative results reported in 15.5% of CxCa and 4.3% of CIN 2/3.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV 16/18/59/39/45 genotypes were significantly more prevalent in CxCa cases than in CIN 2/3 cases, consistent with the more limited progressive potential of some CIN 2/3 lesions. Of CIN 2/3 and CxCa cases, 10% to 12% had recent negative hrHPV test results, pointing to a significant limitation of primary HPV screening.

Test performance and acceptability of self- versus provider-collected swabs for high-risk HPV DNA testing in female-to-male trans masculine patients

Background

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) causes virtually all cervical cancers. Trans masculine (TM) people (those assigned female at birth who identify with a gender other than female) have low uptake of conventional cervical cancer screening. Self-collected hrHPV DNA testing has high levels of acceptability among cisgender (non-transgender) females and may support increased cervical cancer screening uptake in TM individuals.

Objective

To assess the test performance and acceptability of self-collected vaginal specimens in comparison to provider-collected cervical swabs for hrHPV DNA detection in TM individuals ages 21–64 years.

Methods

Between March 2015-September 2016, 150 TM participants with a cervix (mean age = 27.5 years; SD = 5.7) completed a one-time study visit comprised of a self-report survey, self-collected vaginal HPV DNA swab, clinician-administered cervical HPV swab, and brief interview on acceptability of clinical procedures. Participants were randomized to complete either self- or provider-collection first to minimize ordering effects. Self- and provider-collected samples were tested for 13 hrHPV DNA types using a DNA Hybridization Assay. The primary outcome variable was the concordance (kappa statistic) and performance (sensitivity, specificity) of self-collected vaginal HPV DNA specimens versus provider-collected cervical HPV swabs as the gold standard.

Results

Of the 131 participants completing both the self- and provider-collected HPV tests, 21 cases of hrHPV were detected by the provider cervical swab (gold standard; 16.0% hrHPV prevalence); 15 of these cases were accurately detected by the self-collected vaginal swab (71.4% concordance) (Kappa = 0.75, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.92; p<0.001). Compared to the provider-collected cervical hrHPV DNA sample (gold standard), the self-collected vaginal hrHPV DNA test demonstrated a sensitivity of 71.4% (95% CI: 0.52, 0.91; p = 0.0495) and specificity of 98.2% (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00; p<0.0001). Over 90% of participants endorsed a preference for the self-collected vaginal swab over provider-collected cervical swab.

Conclusion

Self-collected vaginal swabs are highly acceptable to TM as a means to test for hrHPV DNA. Test performance of this self-collection method for hrHPV detection in TM is consistent with previous studies in cisgender females. Self-collected vaginal swab testing for hrHPV DNA represents a reasonable and patient-centered strategy for primary cervical cancer screening in TM patients unwilling to undergo provider collection of specimens via speculum exam.

The clinical performance of computer-assisted liquid-based cytology, primary hrHPV screening, and cotesting at a Turkish Tertiary Care Hospital

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the performance of computer-assisted liquid-based cytology, primary high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) screening, and cytology-hrHPV cotesting with regards to the detection rate of cervical cancer precursor lesions.

METHODS

A total of 22,653 computer-assisted liquid-based cytology specimens interpreted between 2013 and 2015 were included in the study. We compared the false-negative rates and sensitivities for computer-assisted liquid-based cytology, primary hrHPV screening and cytology-hrHPV cotesting among women with normal and abnormal cytologies. Among 1,748 women who had undergone cotesting, 249 underwent follow-up biopsies.

RESULTS

For detecting biopsy-confirmed high-grade lesions, the sensitivities of using hrHPV, Pap tests, and cytology-hrHPV cotesting were 90.67%, 88%, and 98.67%, respectively, while the false-negative rates for hrHPV and Pap tests were 9.3% and 12%, respectively. The false negative rate for cotesting was only 1.3%.

CONCLUSION

Based on the significantly high sensitivity and lower false-negative rates achieved, we conclude that the combination of cytologic screening with hrHPV testing is the best preferred strategy for detection of cervical precursor lesions in our country's conditions.

Optimizing secondary prevention of cervical cancer: Recent advances and future challenges

Although human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines offer enormous promise for the ultimate control and possible elimination of cervical cancer, barriers to uptake and coverage of the vaccine both in high- and low/middle-income settings mean that advances in secondary prevention continue to be essential to prevent unnecessary deaths and suffering from cervical cancer for decades to come. While cytology (the Pap smear) has reduced cervical cancer incidence and prevalence in jurisdictions where it has been systematically implemented in population-based programs-mainly in high-income settings-limitations inherent to this method, and to program delivery, leave many women still vulnerable to cervical cancer. Recent evidence has confirmed that screening based on HPV testing prevents more invasive cervical cancer and precancerous lesions, and offers innovative options such as self-collection of specimens to improve screening uptake broadly. In this paper, we review key advances, future opportunities, and ongoing challenges for secondary prevention of cervical cancer using HPV-based testing.

Cervical biopsy rates before and after the introduction of human papillomavirus type reporting in co-tests with negative cytology

INTRODUCTION

In 2013, our laboratory introduced Roche cobas high-risk human papillomavirus (HRHPV) testing, which includes limited HPV genotype reporting. The shift from Hybrid Capture II (HC2) HPV testing to Roche led to an observed increase in biopsies for patients with negative Papanicolaou tests with positive HRHPV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of data from our facility to examine biopsies conducted on patients with negative Papanicolaou tests and positive HRHPV. We compared data from 2012 (HC2) to 2015 after implementation of Roche cobas platform.

RESULTS

In 2012, 37 biopsies were performed on patients with negative Papanicolaou test and positive HRHPV, out of 82,721 Papanicolaou tests (0.045%). In 2015, the number of biopsies performed on patients with negative Papanicolaou test and positive HRHPV test was 281, out of 115,104 Papanicolaou tests (0.244%; P < 0.001). Of these, 141 had HPV type 16 or 18, and 140 had "other" HRHPV types. We observed an increased detection rate of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or greater lesions (5.4% in 2012 to 8.9% in 2015), but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.398). Fifteen HSIL or greater lesions were found in women with types 16 or 18 (5.3%) and 10 were found in women with "other" HRHPV types (3.6%).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of HRHPV testing with type reporting is associated with a marked increase in the number of women undergoing colposcopy and biopsy for HRHPV despite negative cytology. Half of these have a HRHPV type other than type 16 or 18, despite recommendations to repeat co-testing instead.

Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands

We studied harms related to cervical cancer screening and management of screen-positive women in the United States (US) and the Netherlands. We utilized data from four US integrated health care systems (SEARCH), the US National Health Interview Survey, New Mexico state, the Netherlands national histopathology registry, and included studies on adverse health effects of cervical screening. We compared the number of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear tests, abnormal test results, punch biopsies, treatments, health problems (anxiety, pain, bleeding and discharge) and preterm births associated with excisional treatments. Results were age-standardized to the 2007 US population. Based on SEARCH, an estimated 36 million Pap tests were performed in 2007 for 91 million US women aged 21-65 years, leading to 2.3 million abnormal Pap tests, 1.5 million punch biopsies, 0.3 million treatments for precancerous lesions, 5 thousand preterm births and over 8 million health problems. Under the Netherlands screening practice, fewer Pap tests (58%), abnormal test results (64%), punch biopsies (75%), treatment procedures (40%), preterm births (60%) and health problems (63%) would have occurred. The SEARCH data did not differ much from other US data for 2007 or from more recent data up to 2013. Thus compared to the less intensive screening practice in the Netherlands, US practice of cervical cancer screening may have resulted in two- to threefold higher harms, while the effects on cervical cancer incidence and mortality are similar. The results are also of high relevance in making recommendations for HPV screening. Systematic collection of harms data is needed for monitoring and for better incorporation of harms in making screening recommendations.

Use of Fast Transfer Analysis Cartridges for Cervical Sampling and Real Time PCR Based High Risk HPV Testing in Cervical Cancer Prevention - a Feasibility Study from South India

BACKGROUND

Molecular testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most objective and reproducible of all cervical cancer screening tests and also less demanding in terms of training and quality assurance. However, there is an impending need for cost effective molecular HPV testing methods with sampling ease, easy storage measures and minimum turn around times suitable for a low resource setting.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of using a fast transfer analysis (FTA) mini elute cartridge for cervical sampling to identify high risk HPV by real time PCR and to compare molecular HPV testing and Pap cytology testing to predict histologically confirmed cervical precancer (CIN 2+ lesions) in a cervical cancer prevention program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was conducted as a pilot study (n=200) on women sampled using FTA mini elute cartridges, genotyped by two different real time PCR assays, detecting 13 high risk HPV (HR HPV) species, including HPV16 along with its physical DNA status. Results obtained from each of the tests were compared and analysed using suitable statistical tests.

RESULTS

With FTA mini elute cartridge samples HR HPV positivity was seen in 48/200 (24%). Of these, presence of HPV 16 DNA was observed in 28/48 (58.3%) women. High risk HPV was positive in 20% (37/185) of women with benign cytology and 73.3% (11/15) of women with abnormal cytology findings. A very significant correlation (χ2 = 22.090 ; p=0.000) was observed between cytology and HR HPV findings showing an increasing trend of HR HPV prevalence in 50% (1/2) of LSIL, 75% (3/4) of HSIL and 100% (3/3) of SCC. Of the CIN 2+ lesions identified by histopathology, 88.9% (8/9) had HR HPV. A significant association (χ2=11.223 ; p=0.001) of HR HPV and histopathologically confirmed CIN 2+ lesions was found. Sensitivity of the two tests were comparable but specificity of Pap testing was better (90.7% vs 70.4%) to predict histopathologically diagnosed cervical precancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study explored the feasibility of using a FTA mini elute cartridge for cervical sampling for the first time in India as a part of a community based cervical cancer prevention program. We suggest that FTA based sampling is suitable and feasible for real time based HPV testing. Molecular HR HPV testing can be more sensitive and useful to identify high risk women requiring Pap testing which is more specific to detect histologically confirmed cervical precancer.

Cervical cancer screening: evidence behind the guidelines

Cervical cancer screening involves a complex process of cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, colposcopy, and a multitude of algorithms for the identification of preinvasive disease and prevention of invasive disease. High-risk HPV is a prerequisite for the development of almost all types of cervical cancer; therefore, a test for high-risk HPV has become an integral part of new screening strategies. Major changes to screening guidelines in the last decade include initiation of screening at age 21 years, conservative management of young women with abnormal cytology, extended screening intervals for women age ≥30 years, and cessation of screening in low-risk women at age 65 years. This review will focus on the evidence that has led to the current evidence-based guidelines. Evidence regarding primary HPV testing as well as postvaccine-based screening strategies will also be reviewed.

Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance

In 2011, the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology updated screening guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. Recommended screening strategies were cytology or cotesting (cytology in combination with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing). These guidelines also addressed the use of hrHPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, which was not recommended for use at that time. There is now a growing body of evidence for screening with primary hrHPV testing, including a prospective US-based registration study. Thirteen experts including representatives from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Cancer Society, American Society of Cytopathology, College of American Pathologists, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, convened to provide interim guidance for primary hrHPV screening. This guidance panel was specifically triggered by an application to the FDA for a currently marketed HPV test to be labeled for the additional indication of primary cervical cancer screening. Guidance was based on literature review and review of data from the FDA registration study, supplemented by expert opinion. This document aims to provide information for health care providers who are interested in primary hrHPV testing and an overview of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this strategy for screening as well as to highlight areas in need of further investigation.

Current cervical cancer prevention strategies including cervical screening and prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As screening methods evolve and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination efforts gain traction, knowledge of the current evidence on effectiveness of prevention methods is critical to support further development of programs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Screening has dramatically reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality; however, further progress could be made with implementing new screening techniques, such as HPV DNA testing. Continued focus has been given to methods such as visual inspection with acetic acid/Lugol's iodine (VIA/VILI) and self-testing, which may provide an alternative in settings and populations wherein infrastructural challenges and logistical barriers pose challenges to achieving high screening coverage. Postlicensure studies of HPV vaccine show continued effectiveness against genital warts, the first outcome possible to measure. Of note, age-at-vaccination seems to play a pivotal role in effectiveness. Studies examining safety of the HPV vaccines could not confirm any increased risk associated with vaccination.

SUMMARY

Existing cervical screening techniques are effective; however, programs should consider implementing HPV DNA testing where applicable and further process developments for alternative methods may result in improved results. The HPV vaccine is safe and effective and should be given before sexual debut to achieve maximum protection.

Sensitivity, effect and overdiagnosis in screening for cancers with detectable pre-invasive phase

Studies on cancer screening often evaluate the performance by indirect indicators. In case the screening detects pre-invasive lesions, they may be a mixture of benefit of sensitivity and effect as well as of harm of overdiagnosis. Here, we develop the formulae for the sensitivity, the effect and overdiagnosis in screening for pre-invasive lesions of cancer. Sensitivity is the ability of screening to identify a progressive lesion at the level of test (relevant for the laboratory), episode (relevant in the clinic) and programme (relevant at the population level). Effect is reduction of cancer incidence in those screened (efficacy) and in the target population (effectiveness). The sensitivity is estimated by interval cancers between two consecutive screens (incidence method) and the effect by interval cancers and cancers detected at the subsequent screen. Overdiagnosis is estimated as the detection rate of pre-invasive lesions minus the rate of invasive cancer prevented by screening in one screening round. All the indicators are corrected for nonattendance and selective attendance by disease risk. The population to be followed and the period of follow-up are defined for each indicator separately. Data on cervix cancer screening with Papnet® automation device are given as an example. Estimation of sensitivity and effect are consistent with the purpose of the screening to prevent invasive disease. We further define the purpose at the level of laboratory, clinical medicine and public health and derive six estimators corresponding to the specific purposes considered in our article.

Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women in India. Because Pap smear screening is not feasible in India, we need to develop effective alternatives.

METHODS

A cluster-randomized controlled study was initiated in 1998 in Mumbai, India, to investigate the efficacy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) performed by primary health workers in reducing cervical cancer mortality. Four rounds of cancer education and VIA screening were conducted at 24-month intervals in the screening group, whereas cancer education was offered once at entry to the control group. The study was planned for 16 years to include four screening rounds followed by four monitoring rounds. We present results after 12 years of follow-up. Poisson regression method was used to calculate the rate ratios (RRs); two-sided χ(2) was used to calculate the probability.

RESULTS

We recruited 75360 women from 10 clusters in the screening group and 76178 women from 10 comparable clusters in the control group. In the screening group, we achieved 89% participation for screening and 79.4% compliance for diagnosis confirmation. The incidence of invasive cervical cancer was 26.74 per 100000 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.41 to 30.74) in the screening group and 27.49 per 100000 (95% CI = 23.66 to 32.09) in the control group. Compliance to treatment for invasive cancer was 86.3% in the screening group and 72.3% in the control group. The screening group showed a statistically significant 31% reduction in cervical cancer mortality (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.88; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

VIA screening by primary health workers statistically significantly reduced cervical cancer mortality. Our study demonstrates the efficacy of an easily implementable strategy that could prevent 22000 cervical cancer deaths in India and 72600 deaths in resource-poor countries annually.

Application of the Carolina Framework for Cervical Cancer Prevention

OBJECTIVE

The Carolina Framework for Cervical Cancer Prevention describes 4 main causes of cervical cancer incidence: human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, lack of screening, screening errors, and not receiving follow-up care. We present 2 applications of the Carolina Framework in which we identify high-need counties in North Carolina and generate recommendations for improving prevention efforts.

METHODS

We created a cervical cancer prevention need index (CCPNI) that ranked counties on cervical cancer mortality, HPV vaccine initiation and completion, Pap smear screening, and provision of Pap tests to rarely- or never-screened women. In addition, we conducted in-depth interviews with 19 key informants from programs and agencies involved in cervical cancer prevention in North Carolina.

RESULTS

North Carolina's 100 counties varied widely on individual CCPNI components, including annual cervical cancer mortality (median 2.7/100,000 women; range 0.0-8.0), adolescent girls' HPV vaccine initiation (median 42%; range 15%-62%), and Pap testing in the previous 3 years among Medicaid-insured adult women (median 59%; range 40%-83%). Counties with the greatest prevention needs formed 2 distinct clusters in the northeast and south-central regions of the state. Interviews generated 9 recommendations to improve cervical cancer prevention in North Carolina, identifying applications to specific programs and policies in the state.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found striking geographic disparities in cervical cancer prevention need in North Carolina. Future prevention efforts in the state should prioritize high-need regions as well as recommended strategies and applications in existing programs. Other states can use the Carolina Framework to increase the impact of their cervical cancer prevention efforts.

Evolution of cervical cancer screening and prevention in United States and Canada: implications for public health practitioners and clinicians

OBJECTIVE

Declines in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada and in the United States have been widely attributed to the introduction of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. This article reviews changes in screening and introduction of HPV vaccination.

METHOD

Sentinel events in cervical cancer screening and primary prevention through HPV vaccination in the US and Canada are described.

RESULTS

Despite commonalities, cervical cancer screening and prevention differ between the two countries. Canada has a combination of opportunistic and organized programs at the provincial and territorial level, while the US has opportunistic screening and vaccination systems. In the US, the HPV test along with the Pap test (co-testing) is part of national recommendations for routine cervical cancer screening for women age 30 and older. Co-testing is not being considered anywhere in Canada, but primary HPV testing is currently recommended (but not implemented) in one province in Canada.

CONCLUSION

Many prevention strategies are available for cervical cancer. Continued public health efforts should focus on increasing vaccine coverage in the target age groups and cervical cancer screening for women at appropriate intervals. Ongoing evaluation will be needed to ensure appropriate use of health resources, as vaccinated women become eligible for screening.