Adenovirus-12 genes undetectable in human retinoblastoma

HPV infections in retinoblastoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in children less than 4 years. Retinoblastoma (RB) contains about 3%-5% of all childhood cancers. Recent studies demonstrated that interacting between RB tumor suppressor and oncoproteins of DNA tumor viruses such as human papillomavirus (HPV). The objective of the current systematic review study was to present conducted studies in the field of HPV infection and its possible role in retinoblastoma.

METHODS

For this systematic review, all relevant original research studies were assessed by searching in electronic databases include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science by using relevant keywords. The study was designed based on the PRISMA criteria. All publications with English literature and original researches are considered for screening.

RESULTS

Conducted search results lead to 4070 studies. The title and abstract screening lead to 11 studies. Data extraction was performed on 8 included studies. The prevalence of the HPV was ranged from 0 to 69%, and HPV genotype 16 and 18 were the most detected types. The most used method for the detection of the viruses was PCR, and the most assessed sample was formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks.

CONCLUSION

The association between HPV and retinoblastoma is still inconsistent. The prevalence of the HPV in RB was ranged from 0 to 69%, which indicates a wide range and highlights the importance of further investigation for more accurate statistical of HPV prevalence in RB. Thus, further worldwide studies of larger sample sizes of cohorts should be investigated to clarify this uncertainty.

How the Rb tumor suppressor structure and function was revealed by the study of Adenovirus and SV40

The review recounts the history of how the study of the DNA tumor viruses including polyoma, SV40 and Adenovirus brought key insights into the structure and function of the Retinoblastoma protein (Rb). Knudsen's model of the two-hit hypothesis to explain patterns of hereditary and sporadic retinoblastoma provided the foundation for the tumor suppressor hypothesis that ultimately led to the cloning of the Rb gene. The discovery that SV40 and Adenovirus could cause tumors when inoculated into animals was startling not only because SV40 had contaminated the poliovirus vaccine and Adenovirus was a common cause of viral induced pneumonia but also because they provided an opportunity to study the genetics and biochemistry of cancer. Studies of mutant forms of these viruses led to the identification of the E1A and Large T antigen (LT) oncogenes and their small transforming elements including the Adenovirus Conserved Regions (CR), the SV40 J domain and the LxCxE motif. The immunoprecipitation studies that initially revealed the size and ultimately the identity of cellular proteins that could bind to these transforming elements were enabled by the widespread development of highly specific monoclonal antibodies against E1A and LT. The identification of Rb as an E1A and LT interacting protein quickly led to the cloning of p107, p130, p300, CBP, p400 and TRRAP and the concept that viral transformation was due, at least in part, to the perturbation of the function of normal cellular proteins. In addition, studies on the ability of E1A to transactivate the Adenovirus E2 promoter led to the cloning of the heterodimeric E2F and DP transcription factor and recognition that Rb repressed transcription of cellular genes required for cell cycle entry and progression. More recent studies have revealed how E1A and LT combine the activity of Rb and the other cellular associated proteins to perturb expression of many genes during viral infection and tumor formation.

Preferential transformation of human neuronal cells by human adenoviruses and the origin of HEK 293 cells

The 293 cell line was derived by transformation of primary cultures of human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells with sheared adenovirus (Ad)5 DNA. A combination of immunostaining, immunoblot, and microarray analysis showed that 293 cells express the neurofilament (NF) subunits NF-L, NF-M, NF-H, and a-internexin as well as many other proteins typically found in neurons. Three other independently derived HEK lines, two transformed by Ad5 and one by Ad12, also expressed NFs, as did one human embryonic retinal cell line transformed with Ad5. Two rodent kidney lines transformed with Ad12 were also found to express NF proteins, although several rodent kidney cell lines transformed by Ad5 DNA and three HEK cell lines transformed by the SV40 early region did not express NFs. These results suggest that human Ads preferentially transform human neuronal lineage cells. We also demonstrate that the widely used HEK293 cells have an unexpected relationship to neurons, a finding that may require reinterpretation of many previous studies in which it was assumed that HEK293 cells resembled more typical kidney epithelial cells.

Transformation by human adenoviruses

When, approximately 10 years ago, it was shown that the functions essential for cell transformation were localized in a small region of the adenovirus genome, a DNA segment which at that time was thought to be capable of encoding two or three average-sized proteins at most, it seemed reasonable to hope that an understanding of the mechanisms by which adenoviruses transform cells might be quickly achieved. While such optimism might be forgiven, it was quite clearly naive in the extreme. As a consequence of mRNA splicing and the use of overlapping reading frames the number of proteins encoded within E1 is 2-3-times greater than would have been predicted a decade ago, and post-translational modifications may add another dimension of complexity. In fact it has taken nearly all of the past decade just to identify the proteins encoded in E1 and to characterize them in the most rudimentary way. However, we have now entered a period in which new information is accumulating at an extremely rapid rate as a result of several major technical and fundamental advances. Chief among these are the use of recombinant DNA techniques, particularly site-directed mutagenesis, which combined with methods for introducing mutations made in cloned sequences back into infectious virus, clearly represents a powerful approach to studying the functions of transforming proteins. In addition, the ability to express transforming proteins in bacteria and to produce large amounts of highly purified proteins which previously were only just detectable in infected and transformed cells is a major breakthrough. Advances in immunological techniques, particularly the development of monoclonal antibodies and antisera against synthetic peptides, have enormously simplified the task of detecting and characterizing E1 proteins. Finally, recent results suggesting that adenovirus transforming proteins may be functionally and structurally similar to other oncogenes brings a new perspective to the study of oncogenic transformation. Have all the proteins involved in transformation by adenoviruses been identified? It seems probable that all those virally coded proteins which play a major role are now known but of course minor players in the cast could still be waiting in the wings. We have pointed out that viral functions encoded outside region E1 may have some importance at least in initiation of transformation by virions and have speculated on the possibility that one or more of these may be involved in the integration of viral DNA into the host cell chromosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)