Place of birth and incidence of ocular melanoma in the United States

Ambient ultraviolet radiation and ocular melanoma incidence in the United States, 2000-2019

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Ocular melanoma is a rare, but deadly cancer. This large cancer registry study examines the associations between solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and incidence of different anatomical sites of ocular melanoma by sex, age, laterality, and race and ethnicity.

METHODS

Incidence data were derived from 21 cancer registries in the US for the years 2000-2019. Satellite-based UVR estimates were linked to county of residence at diagnosis. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for UVR quartiles using Poisson models.

RESULTS

UVR was not associated with total ocular melanoma (N = 18,089) comparing Q4 versus Q1 (IRR = 0.98; 95%CI:0.94,1.03; p-trend = 0.07) or conjunctival melanoma (IRR = 0.99; 95%CI:0.82,1.19; p-trend = 0.81). However, in analyses of continuous UVR (per 10 mW/m2), risks were reduced for total ocular melanoma (IRR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). Incidence was increased for ciliary body/iris melanoma in the highest UVR quartile (IRR = 1.63; 95%CI:1.43,1.87; p-trend < 0.0001) and remained increased in non-Hispanic White individuals only. Incidence was reduced for choroidal melanoma in the highest UVR quartile (IRR = 0.86; 95%CI:0.82,0.91; p-trend < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

UVR may be associated with increased risk of ciliary body/iris melanoma. Reduced risk of choroidal melanoma may be due to higher diffuse UVR exposure to posterior ocular sites in locations at higher latitudes. Our results support and expand previous findings of associations of UVR using various surrogates on ocular melanoma risk and serve as a starting point for understanding the differences in the relationship between UVR and specific anatomical sites.

Sunlamp use is a risk factor for uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Advancements in the treatment of uveal melanoma have not improved survival; therefore, identifying modifiable risk factors is critical to improving outcomes. This study aims to investigate the association between sunlamp use and the development of uveal melanoma.

DESIGN

This study is designed as a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Literature was searched and reviewed through the MEDLINE (with both OVID and PubMed), EMBASE, MD Consult, and Web of Science databases. These databases were searched from 1966 to 2019 using the following keywords to identify articles examining risk factors for uveal melanoma: ultraviolet, sun, sunlight, uveal melanoma, eye cancer, eye melanoma, nevus, and risk factor. All articles were evaluated for inclusion based on methodology and data reporting association between sunlamp use and uveal melanoma. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess data quality and validity. A random effects model was employed.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies, enrolling a total of 1753 uveal melanoma cases and 3399 controls were included in this meta-analysis. The results of this study showed a positive association between sunlamp use and uveal melanoma (odds ratio = 2.15; 95% confidence interval 1.27-3.64). Meta-regression of between study heterogeneity did not reveal a statistically significant association when publication year, site latitude, melanoma tissue location (specifically, inclusion of iris tumors), or control type (population versus clinic) were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis identified a statistically significant association between sunlamp use and uveal melanoma, supporting sunlamp use as a modifiable risk factor for uveal melanoma.

Uveal Melanoma Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses

PURPOSE

There is currently no clinical risk-assessment tool allowing identification of patients at risk for developing uveal melanoma (UM) who might benefit from regular screening. As a first step toward the elaboration of such a tool, we systematically reviewed UM risk factors already established by meta-analysis.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently screened Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science from their respective inception dates until July 2016 using a combination of keywords and MeSH terms. Eligible studies were meta-analyses or systematic reviews providing pooled odds ratios (ORs) of risk factors for UM development or sufficient information to calculate them. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool.

RESULTS

Four meta-analyses with a mean methodological quality score of 65.9% (min: 54.5%; max: 72.7%) were included. The following significant risk factors were identified: atypical cutaneous nevi (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.10-7.26), welding (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.20-3.51), occupational cooking (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.33-2.46), fair skin color (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.31-2.47), light eye color (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.31-2.34), common cutaneous nevi (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.27-2.39), propensity to sunburn (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.29-2.09), iris nevi (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03-2.27), and cutaneous freckles (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.49). Non-significant factors included outdoor leisure activity, occupational sunlight exposure, latitude of birth, and hair color.

CONCLUSION

Moderate quality of evidence determined nine significant risk factors for developing UM. Knowledge of these variables will assist researchers in the elaboration of a formal risk-assessment tool allowing clinicians to estimate susceptibility to the disease and necessity of regular screening.

Uveal and Conjunctival Malignant Melanoma in Denmark, 1943–97: Incidence and Validation Study

PURPOSE

To study the incidence of malignant melanoma in the ocular region in Denmark during the period 1943-97.

METHODS

The patients were mainly identified through the Danish Cancer Registry. Age-period-cohort modelling of the incidence rates was done based on age at diagnosis, calendar period and birth cohort in 5-year groups and for each gender.

RESULTS

The age-standardized incidence of malignant melanoma in the ocular region was 0.78 for men (N = 1327) and 0.65 for women (N = 1242) per 100,000 person-years. Calendar period and birth cohort had no effect on the incidence in the ocular region or in the topography subgroups choroid/ciliary body and conjunctiva. However, the incidence increased with birth cohort for iris melanomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of malignant melanoma in the ocular region was stable in contrast to a major increase in cutaneous melanoma in Denmark during the period 1943-97. The incidence of iris melanomas increased substantially, whereas the rate was stable for choroid/ciliary body and conjunctival melanomas.

The association of cutaneous and iris nevi with uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To study the relationship between cutaneous and iris nevi with uveal melanoma.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

Three researchers independently searched the literature using Medline from 1966 to August 2007 (with both Ovid and PubMed), EMBASE, MD Consult, and the Web of Science. All bibliographies were searched, and an attempt to contact all primary authors was made to find further unpublished studies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk factor data were extracted into 4 a priori groups: (1) atypical cutaneous nevi, (2) common cutaneous nevi, (3) cutaneous freckles, and (4) iris nevi.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of 4 studies (850 cases) examining atypical cutaneous nevi yielded a summary odds ratio (OR) of 2.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-7.26; P=0.032). Common cutaneous nevi were reported in 4 studies (825 cases), yielding a summary OR of 1.74 (CI, 1.27-2.39; P=0.001). Cutaneous freckles using 7 studies (2122 cases) found an OR of 1.22 (CI, 1.03-1.45; P=0.022). Iris nevi using 4 studies (825 cases) found an OR of 1.53 (CI, 1.03-2.27; P=0.036). There was no evidence of publication bias for the aforementioned risk factors, with the exception of atypical cutaneous nevi (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports an association between uveal melanoma and atypical cutaneous nevi, common cutaneous nevi, cutaneous freckles, and iris nevi.

Latitude and incidence of ocular melanoma

We investigated the associations between latitude and the incidence of two different types of ocular melanoma, external ocular melanoma (exposed to sunlight) and internal melanoma (not exposed to sunlight), separately. Using 1992-2002 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of National Cancer Institute, we identified 2142 ocular melanoma cases in non-Hispanic whites, and then regressed the incidences of various types of ocular melanomas with latitude. Our analysis indicated that the higher the latitude (away from the equator, the less sun exposure), the lower the risk of external ocular melanoma (eyelid and conjunctival melanomas) among non-Hispanic whites (P for trend = 0.018). The incidence increased 2.48 fold from 47-48 degrees to 20-22 degrees. This trend is very similar to that of skin melanoma. The incidence of internal ocular melanoma (uveal melanoma) increased significantly with increasing latitudes (the less sun exposure, P for trend < 0.0001), it increased 4.91 fold from 20-22 degrees to 47-48 degrees. The latitudinal patterns of ocular melanomas may reflect the dual effects of sunlight exposure, i.e. a mutagenic effect of direct solar radiation on external ocular melanomas and a protective effect for internal uveal melanoma, which is similar to the sun radiation protective effects for various internal malignant tumors that are not exposed to the sunlight.

Associations between ocular melanoma and other primary cancers: An international population-based study

Ocular melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poorly understood etiology, especially concerning its link with ultraviolet-light exposure. Studying the risk of second primary cancers may help to formulate causal hypotheses. We used data from 13 cancer registries, including 10,396 first occurring ocular melanoma cases, and 404 second occurring cases. To compare the second cancer incidence in ocular melanoma patients to that in noncancer population, we calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of 32 types of cancer. We also calculated SIRs of second ocular melanoma after other primaries. Ocular melanoma patients had significantly increased risk of cutaneous melanoma (SIR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.77-3.14), multiple myeloma (SIR = 2.00, 1.29-2.95), and of liver (SIR = 3.89, 2.66-5.49), kidney (SIR = 1.70, 1.22-2.31), pancreas (SIR = 1.58, 1.16-2.11), prostate (SIR = 1.31, 1.11-1.54), and stomach (SIR = 1.33, 1.03-1.68) cancers. Risks of cutaneous melanoma were highly variable between registries and were mainly increased in females, in younger patients, in first years following diagnosis, and for patients diagnosed after 1980. The risk of ocular melanoma was significantly increased only after prostate cancer (SIR = 1.41, 1.08-1.82). Risk of cutaneous melanoma after ocular melanoma had epidemiological patterns, similar to cutaneous melanoma screening in the general population. The increased risk of cutaneous melanoma would be largely due to greater skin cancer surveillance in ocular melanoma patients, and not to common etiological factors. The high SIR found for liver cancer may be explained by misclassification bias. Common etiological factors may be involved in ocular and prostate cancers.

Intermittent and chronic ultraviolet light exposure and uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between ultraviolet light exposure and uveal melanoma.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A review of 133 published reports on risk factors for uveal melanoma revealed 12 studies that provided sufficient information to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and standard errors for ultraviolet light exposure factors. Data from these studies were extracted and categorized into intermittent ultraviolet exposure factors (welding, outdoor leisure, photokeratitis) and chronic ultraviolet exposure factors (occupational sunlight exposure, birth latitude, lifetime ultraviolet exposure index). Summary statistics were calculated for all risk factors reported by > or =4 independent studies.

MAIN EXPOSURE MEASURES

Welding, outdoor leisure, photokeratitis, occupational sunlight exposure, birth latitude, and lifetime ultraviolet exposure index.

RESULTS

For intermittent ultraviolet exposure, welding was found to be a significant risk factor (5 studies, 1137 cases; OR, 2.05 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-3.51]). Outdoor leisure was found to be nonsignificant (4 studies, 1332 cases; OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.71-1.04]). Photokeratitis conferred susceptibility in 3 reports studying this variable, but there were too few studies to validate meta-analyses. For chronic ultraviolet exposure, meta-analysis found occupational sunlight exposure to be a borderline nonsignificant risk factor for development of uveal melanoma (4 studies, 572 cases; OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.96-1.96]). Latitude of birth was found to be nonsignificant (5 studies, 1765 cases; OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.67-1.74]).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis yielded inconsistent results associating ultraviolet light with development of uveal melanoma. There was evidence implicating welding as a possible risk factor for uveal melanoma.

Incidence of noncutaneous melanomas in the U.S

BACKGROUND

Description of the epidemiology of noncutaneous melanoma has been hampered by its rarity. The current report was the largest in-depth descriptive analysis of incidence of noncutaneous melanoma in the United States, using data from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

METHODS

Pooled data from 27 states and one metropolitan area were used to examine the incidence of noncutaneous melanoma by anatomic subsite, gender, age, race, and geography (northern/southern and coastal/noncoastal) for cases diagnosed between 1996 and 2000. Percent distribution by stage of disease at diagnosis and histology were also examined.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 2000, 6691 cases of noncutaneous melanoma (4885 ocular and 1806 mucosal) were diagnosed among 851 million person-years at risk. Ocular melanoma was more common among men compared with women (6.8 cases per million men compared with 5.3 cases per million women, age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. population standard), whereas mucosal melanoma was more common among women (2.8 cases per million women compared with 1.5 cases per million men). Rates of ocular melanoma among whites were greater than eight times higher than among blacks. Rates of mucosal melanoma were approximately two times higher among whites compared with blacks.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to cutaneous melanoma, there was no apparent pattern of increased noncutaneous melanoma among residents of southern or coastal states, with the exception of melanoma of the ciliary body and iris. Despite their shared cellular origins, both ocular and mucosal melanomas differ from cutaneous melanoma in terms of incidence by gender, race, and geographic area.

Sunlight exposure and pathogenesis of uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most frequent primary malignant intraocular tumor of adults. Among various non-modifiable risk factors, Caucasian race seems to be the most significant with light skin color, blond hair, and blue eyes being specific risk factors. The racial predisposition to uveal melanoma have been explained on the basis of susceptibility of Caucasian race to oncogenic effects of sunlight. Although there is ample evidence in support of this hypothesis in regard to skin melanoma, the evidence in regard to uveal melanoma is insufficient and contradictory. In the following review, we examine physiologic, epidemiological, and genetic data in order to determine the role of sunlight exposure in the pathogenesis of uveal melanoma.

Relationship of uveal and cutaneous malignant melanoma in persons with multiple primary tumors

Uveal and cutaneous melanomas differ in tumor biology, immunophenotypes and the demographic correlates of their occurrence. As a means to examine the possibility of some shared etiologic factors, we wished to learn if the 2 cancers occurred in the same individual more often than would be expected by chance. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program from 1973-1998 were utilized for this purpose. The number of persons who went on to develop a second melanoma was compared to that expected based on the incidence of each type of melanoma in the general population, after adjusting for age, sex, calendar year and residence. Given an initial cutaneous melanoma, there was a 10-fold increased risk of developing a second cutaneous melanoma (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.4-10.6). Persons with uveal melanoma went on to develop cutaneous melanoma 4.6 times (95% CI = 2.9-6.8) more often than the population at large. In contrast, persons with cutaneous melanoma were not subsequently diagnosed with uveal melanoma at an appreciably elevated rate (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.5-3.0). While these data offer some support for the hypothesis that uveal and cutaneous melanomas have 1 or more etiologies in common, the lack of symmetry in the pattern of second uveal and second cutaneous melanomas remains unexplained.

Ocular melanomas and melanocytic lesions of the eye

This article describes several melanocytic lesions of the eye. Benign and malignant lesions will be discussed as well as a review of the dysplastic nevus syndrome and its proposed association with ocular melanoma. Ocular melanomas arise from the same embryologically derived melanocytes as their cutaneous counterparts. However, ocular and cutaneous melanomas differ in many respects. The diagnosis and management of these ocular tumors rely heavily on the ophthalmologist. However, knowledge of melanocytic lesions will aid the dermatologist in detection and in proper referral of these patients.

Solar ultraviolet radiation and ocular disease: a review of the epidemiological and experimental evidence

Exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation has been linked, at some point, with more than a dozen eye diseases. Some of these associations are based solely on anecdotes, while others have been subjected to epidemiological investigations. For each eye disease, the evidence for an association with ultraviolet radiation is presented and evaluated. The only eye disease for which there is sufficient evidence of a causal association in humans is photokeratitis. For several eye diseases (climatic droplet keratopathy, pterygium, cataract) there is limited evidence for an association, while for other diseases (uveal melanoma, macular degeneration) there is either little support for an association or inadequate data on which to base an assessment.

Are atypical nevi a risk factor for uveal melanoma? A case-control study

Atypical nevi and other potential risk factors for uveal melanoma were studied in 109 uveal melanoma patients and 149 controls. Information concerning employment, medical history, drug use, family history of cancer, excess sun exposure, and blistering sunburn before and after the age of 15 was obtained. A total skin examination was performed and skin type, hair color, eye color, freckles, actinic damage, the total number of common acquired nevi, and the number of clinically atypical nevi were noted. More atypical nevi were found in uveal melanoma patients than in controls (age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio of 2.9 [95% confidence interval 1.2-6.3] for one or two atypical nevi versus none; odds ratio of 5.1 [95% CI 1.3-20.0] for three or more atypical nevi versus none). Light skin types and freckling also prevailed in uveal melanoma cases. In our study, atypical nevi are more common in uveal melanoma patients than in controls. Further studies will have to indicate whether risk factors comparable to those for cutaneous melanoma really exist for uveal melanoma.

Uveal melanoma: is solar ultraviolet radiation a risk factor?

Age-standardized mortality rates for cancers of the eye among adults in England and Wales are compared with those for cutaneous malignant melanoma. While cutaneous malignant melanoma rates have increased three-fold since 1950-54, rates for cancers of the eye have remained relatively constant over the same period. Collectively, the inconclusive findings of case-control studies for an association between exposure to ultraviolet radiation and uveal melanoma, the lack of supporting dosimetry data, together with the lack of an upward trend in mortality rates for cancers of the eye, suggests that exposure to ultraviolet radiation may not be a major factor in the etiology of uveal melanoma.

Malignant melanoma risk by nativity, place of residence at diagnosis, and age at migration

Although geographic latitude is clearly linked to the risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma, the chronology of this link is unclear. Based on the 4,611 cases of melanoma with known place of nativity diagnosed in 1972-82 among the non-Latino White residents of Los Angeles County (California, United States) of known place of origin, migrants to Los Angeles from higher US latitudes enjoy relative safety from skin melanoma. This relative safety is largely unaffected by the interval since migration, even after decades of residence in Los Angeles. The same relative protection is enjoyed by native residents of more northerly US communities in comparison with co-resident migrants from the southwestern US. While the observed effect of latitude is consistent with the accepted importance of solar radiation as a determinant of melanoma risk, it suggests that early, rather than late or cumulative, exposure is of most importance. This finding does not affirm the belief that protection of adult skin from exposure to the sun will reduce the risk from melanoma. It does suggest that decades must pass before it will be possible to assess the impact on melanoma risk of any increase in ultraviolet radiation delivered to the earth as a result of the destruction of atmospheric ozone.