1
|
Plunkett C, Pilkington M. Beliefs, screening attitudes and breast cancer awareness of young women with neurofibromatosis type 1: A reflexive thematic analysis. J Health Psychol 2024:13591053241255053. [PMID: 38859614 DOI: 10.1177/13591053241255053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) predisposes individuals to benign and malignant tumours. Young women with NF1 (<50 years) have an up to five-fold increased risk of breast cancer. The UK adopts moderate cancer risk guidelines of NICE, advising women with NF1 to attend breast screening from 40 years. Previous results from a systematic review and meta-analysis found that breast cancer in this cohort predominantly occurs from 34 to 44 years. Without earlier screening, breast awareness is fundamental. Reflexive thematic analysis and semi-structured interview questions based on the health belief model explored whether a tailor-made breast cancer awareness intervention would be beneficial by examining beliefs, screening attitudes and breast cancer awareness of young women with NF1. Findings suggest the establishment of accessible and accurate NF1 and breast awareness information, development and implementation of a breast awareness intervention for young women with NF1, and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
|
2
|
Niell BL, Jochelson MS, Amir T, Brown A, Adamson M, Baron P, Bennett DL, Chetlen A, Dayaratna S, Freer PE, Ivansco LK, Klein KA, Malak SF, Mehta TS, Moy L, Neal CH, Newell MS, Richman IB, Schonberg M, Small W, Ulaner GA, Slanetz PJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:S126-S143. [PMID: 38823941 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany L Niell
- Panel Chair, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
| | | | - Tali Amir
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ann Brown
- Panel Vice Chair, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Megan Adamson
- Clinica Family Health, Lafayette, Colorado; American Academy of Family Physicians
| | - Paul Baron
- Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York; American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Alison Chetlen
- Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Sandra Dayaratna
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | | | | | | | | | - Tejas S Mehta
- UMass Memorial Medical Center/UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Linda Moy
- NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Mary S Newell
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; RADS Committee
| | - Ilana B Richman
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Society of General Internal Medicine
| | - Mara Schonberg
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; American Geriatrics Society
| | - William Small
- Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, Illinois; Commission on Radiation Oncology
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Priscilla J Slanetz
- Specialty Chair, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kubota K, Nakashima K, Nakashima K, Kataoka M, Inoue K, Goto M, Kanbayashi C, Hirokaga K, Yamaguchi K, Suzuki A. The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:157-164. [PMID: 37973686 PMCID: PMC10901949 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01521-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
This article provides updates to readers based on the newly published Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 2022 Edition. These guidelines incorporate the latest evaluation of evidence from studies of diagnostic accuracy. For each clinical question, outcomes for benefits and harms were established, and qualitative or quantitative systematic reviews were conducted. Recommendations were determined through voting by a multidisciplinary group, and guidelines were documented to facilitate shared decision-making among patients and medical professionals. The guidelines address screening, surveillance, and pre- and postoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. In an environment that demands an integrated approach, decisions are needed on how to utilize modalities, such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and PET/CT. Additionally, it is vital to understand the appropriate use of new technologies, such as tomosynthesis, elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and to consider how best to adapt these methods for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Kubota
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minami-koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kazutaka Nakashima
- Department of General Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Nakashima
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Breast Imaging and Breast Interventional Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masako Kataoka
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kenich Inoue
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Breast Cancer Center, Shonan Memorial Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mariko Goto
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chizuko Kanbayashi
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirokaga
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ken Yamaguchi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Akihiko Suzuki
- Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Faria RA, Leal LB, Thebit MM, Pereira SWA, Serafim NR, Barauna VG, da Chagas E Silva Carvalho LF, Sartório CL, Gouvea SA. Potential Role of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as a Screening Approach for Breast Cancer. APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY 2023; 77:405-417. [PMID: 36703259 DOI: 10.1177/00037028231156194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and its spread involves a succession of clinical and pathological stages. Screening is predominantly based on mammography, which has critical limitations related to the effectiveness and production of false-positive or false-negative results, generating discomfort and low adherence. In this context, infrared with attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR FT-IR) spectroscopy emerges as a non-destructive sample tool, which is non-invasive, label-free, has a low operating-cost, and requires only a small amount of sample, including liquid plasma samples. We sought to evaluate the clinical applicability of ATR FT-IR in breast cancer screening. ATR FT-IR spectroscopy through its highest potential spectral biomarker could distinguish, by liquid plasma biopsy, breast cancer patients and healthy controls, obtaining a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 93%, a receiver operating characteristic ROC curve of 97%, and a prediction accuracy of 94%. The main variance between the groups was mainly in the band 1511 cm-1 of the control group, 1502 and 1515 cm-1 of the cancer group, which are the peaks of the bands referring to proteins and amide II. ATR FT-IR spectroscopy has demonstrated to be a promising tool for breast cancer screening, given its time efficiency, cost of approach, and its high ability to distinguish between the liquid plasma samples of breast cancer patients and healthy controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo A Faria
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
| | - Leonardo B Leal
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
| | - Marcela M Thebit
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
| | - Sergio W A Pereira
- Mastology Service Evangelical Hospital of Vila Velha, Vila Velha, Brazil
| | - Neuzimar R Serafim
- Mastology Service Evangelical Hospital of Vila Velha, Vila Velha, Brazil
| | - Valerio G Barauna
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
| | | | - Carmem L Sartório
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
| | - Sonia A Gouvea
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), ultrasound and mammography for detection of breast cancer based on tumor type, breast density and patient's history: A review. Radiography (Lond) 2022; 28:848-856. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
6
|
Weinstein SP, Slanetz PJ, Lewin AA, Battaglia T, Chagpar AB, Dayaratna S, Dibble EH, Goel MS, Hayward JH, Kubicky CD, Le-Petross HT, Newell MS, Sanford MF, Scheel JR, Vincoff NS, Yao K, Moy L. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:S456-S473. [PMID: 34794600 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Mammography remains the only validated screening tool for breast cancer, however, there are limitations to mammography. One of the limitations of mammography is the variable sensitivity based on breast density. Supplemental screening may be considered based on the patient's risk level and breast density. For average-risk women with nondense breasts, the sensitivity of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening is high; additional supplemental screening is not warranted in this population. For average-risk women with dense breasts, given the decreased sensitivity of mammography/DBT, this population may benefit from additional supplemental screening with contrast-enhanced mammography, screening ultrasound (US), breast MRI, or abbreviated breast MRI. In intermediate-risk women, there is emerging evidence suggesting that women in this population may benefit from breast MRI or abbreviated breast MRI. In intermediate-risk women with dense breasts, given the decreased sensitivity of mammography/DBT, this population may benefit from additional supplemental screening with contrast-enhancedmammography or screening US. There is strong evidence supporting screening high-risk women with breast MRI regardless of breast density. Contrast-enhanced mammography, whole breast screening US, or abbreviated breast MRI may be also considered. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Weinstein
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Priscilla J Slanetz
- Panel Chair, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and President, Massachusetts Radiological Society
| | - Alana A Lewin
- Panel Vice-Chair, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Tracy Battaglia
- Director, Womens Health Unit, Associate Director, Belkin Breast Health Center, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and Chair, National Navigation Roundtable
| | - Anees B Chagpar
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Society of Surgical Oncology
| | - Sandra Dayaratna
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Robbinsville, New Jersey; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | | | - Mita Sanghavi Goel
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians
| | | | | | - Huong T Le-Petross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Breast Imaging Lead in Prevention, Breast Committee, DI Committee of the Alliance
| | - Mary S Newell
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; Governor, ABR; and Board Member, SBI
| | | | - John R Scheel
- Fellowship Director, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nina S Vincoff
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York
| | - Katherine Yao
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois; Vice Chair, National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers; and American College of Surgeons
| | - Linda Moy
- Specialty Chair, NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, New York; Chair, ACR NMD Registry; Senior Deputy Editor, Radiology; and Advisory Board, iCAD and Lunit
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu J, Wang X, Dong L, Huang X, Zhao H, Li J, Huang S, Yuan P, Wang W, Wang J, Xing Z, Jia Z, Ming Y, Li X, Qin L, Liu G, Wu J, Li Y, Zhang M, Feng K, Ying J, Wang X. The Distinct Performances of Ultrasound, Mammograms, and MRI in Detecting Breast Cancer in Patients With Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes. Front Oncol 2021; 11:710156. [PMID: 34336698 PMCID: PMC8316045 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.710156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A proportion of up to 10% of breast cancer resulted from hereditary germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in cancer predisposition genes (CPGs), which been demonstrated distinct clinical features and imaging manifestations. However, the performance of imaging modalities for breast cancer surveillance in CPG mutation-carriers is still unclear, especially in Asian women. A population of 3002 breast cancer patients who received germline genetic testing of CPGs was enrolled from three hospitals in China. In total, 343 (11.6%) patients were found to harbor GPVs in CPGs, including 137 (4.6%) in BRCA1 and 135 (4.6%) in BRCA2. We compared the performances of ultrasound, mammograms, MRI, and the combining strategies in CPG mutation carriers and non-carriers. As a result, the ultrasound showed a higher detection rate compared with mammograms regardless of the mutation status. However, its detection rate was lower in CPG mutation carriers than in non-carriers (93.2% vs 98.0%, P=2.1×10-4), especially in the BRCA1 mutation carriers (90.9% vs 98.0%, P=2.0×10-4). MRI presented the highest sensitivity (98.5%) and the lowest underestimation rate (14.5%) in CPG mutation carriers among ultrasound, mammograms, and their combination. Supplemental ultrasound or mammograms would add no significant value to MRI for detecting breast cancer (P>0.05). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the family or personal cancer history could not replace the mutation status as the impact factor for the false-negative result and underestimation. In summary, clinicians and radiologists should be aware of the atypical imaging presentation of breast cancer in patients with GPVs in CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaqi Liu
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Dong
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Huang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hengqiang Zhao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Big Data for Spinal Deformities, Beijing Key Laboratory for Genetic Research of Skeletal Deformity, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shengkai Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pei Yuan
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenyan Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zeyu Xing
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziqi Jia
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Ming
- PET-CT Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ling Qin
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of HuanXing, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiang Wu
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yiqun Li
- Department of Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Menglu Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kexin Feng
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Ying
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gao Y, Fan WH, Duan C, Zhao W, Zhang J, Kang X. Enhancing the Screening Efficiency of Breast Cancer by Combining Conventional Medical Imaging Examinations With Circulating Tumor Cells. Front Oncol 2021; 11:643003. [PMID: 34094929 PMCID: PMC8170472 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.643003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrasound (US) and mammogram (MMG) are the two most common breast cancer (BC) screening tools. This study aimed to assess how the combination of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with US and MMG would improve the diagnostic performance. METHODS CTC detection and imaging examinations, US and MMG, were performed in 238 treatment-naive BC patients, 217 patients with benign breast diseases (BBD), and 20 healthy females. Correlations of CTC, US and MMG with patients' clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. Diagnostic performances of CTC, US and MMG were estimated by the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS CTC, US and MMG could all distinguish BC patients from the control (p < 0.0001). Area under curve (AUC) of CTC, US and MMG are 0.855, 0.861 and 0.759, respectively. While US has the highest sensitivity of 0.79, CTC and MMG have the same specificity of 0.92. Notably, CTC has the highest accuracy of 0.83. Combination with CTC increases the AUC of US and MMG to 0.922 and 0.899, respectively. Combining MMG with CTC or US increases the sensitivity of MMG to 0.87, however "CTC + MMG" has a higher specificity of 0.85. "CTC + US" performs the best in BC diagnosis, followed by "CTC + MMG" and then "US + MMG". CONCLUSION CTC can be used as a diagnostic aid for BC screening. Combination with CTC increases the diagnostic potency of conventional BC screening imaging examinations, US and MMG, in BC diagnosis, especially for MMG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Gao
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Wan-Hung Fan
- Department of Clinical Medical Affairs, Hangzhou Watson Biotech, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chaohui Duan
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenhe Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xixiong Kang
- Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cortesi L, Rugo HS, Jackisch C. An Overview of PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Target Oncol 2021; 16:255-282. [PMID: 33710534 PMCID: PMC8105250 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-021-00796-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are detected in at least 5% of unselected patients with breast cancer (BC). These BC susceptibility genes encode proteins critical for DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR). This review provides an update on oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of BC. Olaparib and talazoparib are PARP inhibitors approved as monotherapies for deleterious/suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative BC. Olaparib is approved in the USA for metastatic BC and in Europe for locally advanced/metastatic BC. Talazoparib is approved for locally advanced/metastatic BC in the USA and Europe. In phase 3 trials, olaparib and talazoparib monotherapies demonstrated significant progression-free survival benefits compared with chemotherapy. Common toxicities were effectively managed by supportive treatment and dose interruptions/reductions. Veliparib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has also shown promise for locally advanced/metastatic BC in a phase 3 trial. Differences in efficacy and safety across PARP inhibitors (olaparib, talazoparib, veliparib, niraparib, rucaparib) may relate to differences in potency of PARP trapping on DNA and cytotoxic specificity. PARP inhibitors are being investigated in early BC, in novel combinations, and in patients without germline BRCA mutations, including those with somatic BRCA mutations and other HRR gene mutations. Ongoing phase 2/3 studies include PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of triple-negative BC. Wider access to testing for BRCA and other mutations, and to genetic counseling, are required to identify patients who could benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy. The advent of PARP inhibitors has potential benefits for BC treatment beyond the locally advanced/metastatic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Breast Cancer Center, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clinicopathologic Profile of Breast Cancer in Germline ATM and CHEK2 Mutation Carriers. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12050616. [PMID: 33919281 PMCID: PMC8143279 DOI: 10.3390/genes12050616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The most common breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes beyond BRCA1/2 are ATM and CHEK2. For the purpose of exploring the clinicopathologic characteristics of BC developed by ATM or CHEK2 mutation carriers, we reviewed the archive of our Family Cancer Clinic. Since 2018, 1185 multi-gene panel tests have been performed. Nineteen ATM and 17 CHEK2 mutation carriers affected by 46 different BCs were identified. A high rate of bilateral tumors was observed in ATM (26.3%) and CHEK2 mutation carriers (41.2%). While 64.3% of CHEK2 tumors were luminal A-like, 56.2% of ATM tumors were luminal B-like/HER2-negative. Moreover, 21.4% of CHEK2-related invasive tumors showed a lobular histotype. About a quarter of all ATM-related BCs and a third of CHEK2 BCs were in situ carcinomas and more than half of ATM and CHEK2-related BCs were diagnosed at stage I-II. Finally, 63.2% of ATM mutation carriers and 64.7% of CHEK2 mutation carriers presented a positive BC family history. The biological and clinical characteristics of ATM and CHEK2-related tumors may help improve diagnosis, prognostication and targeted therapeutic approaches. Contralateral mastectomy should be considered and discussed with ATM and CHEK2 mutation carriers at the first diagnosis of BC.
Collapse
|
11
|
Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 2). Where are we now? Actual MRI screening controversies. RADIOLOGIA 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
12
|
Piombino C, Cortesi L, Lambertini M, Punie K, Grandi G, Toss A. Secondary Prevention in Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer Syndromes Other Than BRCA. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020; 2020:6384190. [PMID: 32733558 PMCID: PMC7376433 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6384190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes are among the best-known and most extensively studied hereditary cancer syndromes. Nevertheless, many patients who proved negative at BRCA genetic testing bring pathogenic mutations in other suppressor genes and oncogenes associated with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers. These genes include TP53 in Li-Fraumeni syndrome, PTEN in Cowden syndrome, mismatch repair (MMR) genes in Lynch syndrome, CDH1 in diffuse gastric cancer syndrome, STK11 in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and NF1 in neurofibromatosis type 1 syndrome. To these, several other genes can be added that act jointly with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the double-strand break repair system, such as PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D. Management of primary and secondary cancer prevention in these hereditary cancer syndromes is crucial. In particular, secondary prevention by screening aims to discover precancerous lesions or cancers at their initial stages because early detection could allow for effective treatment and a full recovery. The present review aims to summarize the available literature and suggest proper screening strategies for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndromes other than BRCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Piombino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Kanker Instituut, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giovanni Grandi
- Department of Obstetrics and Ginecology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alonso Roca S, Delgado Laguna AB, Arantzeta Lexarreta J, Cajal Campo B, López Ruiz A. Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 2). Where are we now? Actual MRI screening controversies. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:417-433. [PMID: 32527577 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
For women with a high risk of breast cancer, early detection plays an important role. Due to the high incidence of breast cancer, and at a younger age than in the general population, screening begins earlier, and there is considerable evidence that magnetic resonance is the most sensitive diagnostic tool, and the principal American and European guidelines agree on the recommendation to perform annual magnetic resonance (with supplemental annual mammography) as an optimal mode of screening. In addition to the absence of current consensus on which patients should be included in the recommendation for magnetic resonance screening (widely discussed in the introduction of part 1 of this work), there are other aspects that are different between guidelines, that are not specified, or that are susceptible to change based on the evidence of several years of experience, that we have called «controversies», such as the age to begin screening, the possible advisability of using a different strategy in different subgroups, performing alternate versus synchronous magnetic resonance and mammography, the age at which to terminate the two techniques, or how to follow up after risk reduction surgery.The aim of the second part of the paper is, by reviewing the literature, to provide an update in relation to some of the main «controversies» in high risk screening with magnetic resonance. And finally, based on all this, to propose a possible model of optimal and updated screening protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Alonso Roca
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España.
| | - A B Delgado Laguna
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - J Arantzeta Lexarreta
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - B Cajal Campo
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - A López Ruiz
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Toss A, Molinaro E, Venturelli M, Domati F, Marcheselli L, Piana S, Barbieri E, Grandi G, Piombino C, Marchi I, Tenedini E, Tagliafico E, Tazzioli G, Cortesi L. BRCA Detection Rate in an Italian Cohort of Luminal Early-Onset and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients without Family History: When Biology Overcomes Genealogy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12051252. [PMID: 32429297 PMCID: PMC7281631 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
NCCN Guidelines recommend BRCA genetic testing in individuals with a probability >5% of being a carrier. Nonetheless, the cost-effectiveness of testing individuals with no tumor family history is still debated, especially when BRCA testing is offered by the national health service. Our analysis evaluated the rate of BRCA pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants in 159 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients diagnosed ≤60 years, and 109 luminal-like breast cancer (BC) patients diagnosed ≤35 without breast and/or ovarian family histories. In TNBC patients, BRCA mutation prevalence was 22.6% (21.4% BRCA1). Mutation prevalence was 64.2% ≤30 years, 31.8% in patients aged 31–40, 16.1% for those aged 41–50 and 7.9% in 51–60 s. A total of 40% of patients with estrogen receptors (ER) 1–9% were BRCA1 carriers. BRCA detection rate in early-onset BCs was 6.4% (4.6% BRCA2). Mutation prevalence was 0% between 0–25 years, 9% between 26–30 years and 6% between 31–35 years. In conclusion, BRCA testing is recommended in TNBC patients diagnosed ≤60 years, regardless of family cancer history or histotype, and by using immunohistochemical staining <10% for both ER and/PR. In luminal-like early-onset BC, a lower BRCA detection rate was observed, suggesting a role for other predisposing genes along with BRCA genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
- Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-059-4223286
| | - Eleonora Molinaro
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Marta Venturelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Federica Domati
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Luigi Marcheselli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Simonetta Piana
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Giovanni Grandi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy;
| | - Claudia Piombino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Isabella Marchi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| | - Elena Tenedini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic hematology and Clinical Genomics Unit, Modena University Hospital, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.T.); (E.T.)
| | - Enrico Tagliafico
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic hematology and Clinical Genomics Unit, Modena University Hospital, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.T.); (E.T.)
- Center for Genome Research University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy;
- Oncologic Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (E.M.); (M.V.); (F.D.); (L.M.); (E.B.); (C.P.); (I.M.); (L.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cortesi L, Baldassarri B, Ferretti S, Razzaboni E, Bella M, Bucchi L, Canuti D, De Iaco P, De Santis G, Falcini F, Galli V, Godino L, Leoni M, Perrone AM, Pignatti M, Saguatti G, Santini D, Sassoli de'Bianchi P, Sebastiani F, Taffurelli M, Tazzioli G, Turchetti D, Zamagni C, Naldoni C. A regional population-based hereditary breast cancer screening tool in Italy: First 5-year results. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2579-2589. [PMID: 32045136 PMCID: PMC7131858 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 10% of individuals with breast cancer (BC) belong to families with hereditary syndromes. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to identify individuals/families at high‐hereditary risk for BC and offer dedicated surveillance programs according to different risks. Methods The instrument consisted of a primary questionnaire collecting history of BC and ovarian cancer (OC). This questionnaire was applied to women enrolled in the Emilia‐Romagna Breast Cancer Screening Program. General practitioners (GPs) and specialists could propose the same questionnaire too. Women with a score of ≥ 2, were invited to complete an oncogenetic counseling. According to the Tyrer‐Cuzick evaluation, women considered at high risk were invited to involve the most representative alive individual of the family affected with BC/OC for BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Results Since January 2012 and December 2016, 660 040 women were evaluated by the regional screening program, of which 22 289 (3.5%) were invited to the Spoke evaluation, but only 5615 accepted (25.2%). Totally, also considering women sent by GPs and specialists, 11 667 were assessed and 5554 were sent to the Hub evaluation. Finally, 2342 (42.8%) women fulfilled the criteria for genetic testing, and 544 (23.2%) resulted BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first regional population‐based multistep model that is aimed to identify individuals with BRCA1/2 mutations and to offer an intensive surveillance program for hereditary‐high risk women. This tool is feasible and effective, even if more efforts must be performed to increase the acceptance of multiple assessments by the study population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Bruna Baldassarri
- Department of Health and Welfare, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Ferretti
- Department of Health and Welfare, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Razzaboni
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Mariangela Bella
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Lauro Bucchi
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Debora Canuti
- Cancer Screening Unit, Local Health Agency of Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Hospital of Bologna Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio De Santis
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Falcini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.,Azienda Usl della Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Vania Galli
- AUSL Modena, Mammography Screening Centre, Modena, Italy
| | - Lea Godino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Hospital of Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maurizio Leoni
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Hospital of Bologna Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Pignatti
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Gianni Saguatti
- Senology Unit, Bellaria Carlo Alberto Pizzardi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Donatella Santini
- Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Federica Sebastiani
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Mario Taffurelli
- Department of the Health of Woman, Child and Urological Diseases, University of Bologna, Hospital of Bologna Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Turchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Hospital of Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Bologna, Hospital of Bologna Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Naldoni
- Department of Health and Welfare, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Elezaby M, Lees B, Maturen KE, Barroilhet L, Wisinski KB, Schrager S, Wilke LG, Sadowski E. BRCA Mutation Carriers: Breast and Ovarian Cancer Screening Guidelines and Imaging Considerations. Radiology 2019; 291:554-569. [PMID: 31038410 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Patients who carry the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations have an underlying genetic predisposition for breast and ovarian cancers. These deleterious genetic mutations are the most common genes implicated in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. This monograph summarizes the evidence behind current screening recommendations, reviews imaging protocols specific to this patient population, and illustrates some of the imaging nuances of breast and ovarian cancers in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Elezaby
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Brittany Lees
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Lisa Barroilhet
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Kari B Wisinski
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Sarina Schrager
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Lee G Wilke
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Elizabeth Sadowski
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cortesi L, Barbieri E, Toss A. Breast ultrasound in high-risk women. Oncotarget 2019; 10:1552-1553. [PMID: 30899424 PMCID: PMC6422182 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|