1
|
van der Zijden CJ, van der Sluis PC, Mostert B, Nuyttens JJME, van Lanschot JJB, Spaander MCW, Valkema R, Coene PPLO, Dekker JWT, Fiets WE, Hartgrink HH, Hazen WL, Kouwenhoven EA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rosman C, van Sandick JW, Sosef MN, van der Zaag ES, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL. Interval Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15890-w. [PMID: 39068317 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15890-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite trimodality treatment, 10% to 20% of patients with esophageal cancer experience interval metastases after surgery. Restaging may identify patients who should not proceed to surgery, as well as a subgroup with limited metastases for whom long-term disease-control can be obtained. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with interval metastases after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and to evaluate treatment and survival. METHODS Patients who had cT2-4aN0-3M0 esophageal cancer treated with nCRT were identified from a trial database. Metastases detected up to 14 weeks after nCRT on 18F-FDG-PET/CT or during surgery were categorized as oligometastases (≤3 lesions located in one single organ or one extra-regional lymph node station) or as non-oligometastases. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with metastases after nCRT. The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and the site and treatment of metastases. RESULTS Between 2013 and 2021, 973 patients received nCRT, and 10.3% had interval metastases. Of 100 patients, 30 (30%) had oligometastases, located mostly in non-regional lymph nodes (33.3%) or bones (26.7%). The median OS of this group was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.2-27.1 months). Of 30 patients, 12 (40%) with oligometastases underwent potentially curative treatment, with a median OS of 22.8 months (95% CI 10.4-NA). The patients with non-oligometastases underwent mostly systemic therapy or BSC and had a median OS of 9 months (95% CI 7.4-10.9 months). CONCLUSIONS Interval metastases were detected in about 10% of patients after nCRT, underscoring the importance of re-staging with 18F-FDG-PET/CT for those who proceed to surgery. A favorable survival might be accomplished for a subgroup of patients with oligometastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlène J van der Zijden
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Pieter C van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roelf Valkema
- Department of Nucleair Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Willem E Fiets
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meindert N Sosef
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Simon AG, Lyu SI, Laible M, Wöll S, Türeci Ö, Şahin U, Alakus H, Fahrig L, Zander T, Buettner R, Bruns CJ, Schroeder W, Gebauer F, Quaas A. The tight junction protein claudin 6 is a potential target for patient-individualized treatment in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma and is associated with poor prognosis. J Transl Med 2023; 21:552. [PMID: 37592303 PMCID: PMC10436499 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04433-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) remains poor, and new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Claudin 6 (CLDN6) is an oncofetal antigen that is largely absent in healthy tissues and upregulated in several cancers, making it a promising therapeutical target. In this study, the expression of CLDN6 was assessed in an large Caucasian EAC and GAC cohort. METHODS RNA-Seq data from 89 EACs and 371 GACs were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas project and EAC/GAC cases were stratified by CLDN6 mRNA expression based on a survival-associated cutoff. For groups with CLDN6 expression above or below this cutoff, differential gene expression analyses were performed using DESeq, and dysregulated biological pathways were identified using the Enrichr tool. Additionally, CLDN6 protein expression was assessed in more than 800 EACs and almost 600 GACs using a CLDN6-specific immunohistochemical antibody (clone 58-4B-2) that is currently used in Phase I/II trials to identify patients with CLDN6-positive tumors (NCT05262530; NCT04503278). The expression of CLDN6 was also correlated with histopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). RESULTS EACs and GACs with high CLDN6 mRNA levels displayed an overexpression of pathways regulating the cell cycle, DNA replication, and receptor / extracellular matrix interactions. CLDN6 protein expression was associated with shorter OS in EAC and GAC, both in treatment-naïve subgroups and cohorts receiving neoadjuvant therapy. In multivariate analysis, CLDN6 protein expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor in EAC associated with a shorter OS (HR: 1.75; p = 0.01) and GAC (HR: 2.74; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS High expression of CLDN6 mRNA is associated with the dysregulation of distinct biological pathways regulating cell growth, proliferation, and cell-matrix interactions. Clinically, the expression of CLDN6 protein is a valuable adverse prognostic marker in EAC and GAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Georg Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Su Ir Lyu
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Hakan Alakus
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Luca Fahrig
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Zander
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Reinhard Buettner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiane Josephine Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schroeder
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Gebauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pape M, Vissers PAJ, Slingerland M, Haj Mohammad N, van Rossum PSN, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. Long-term health-related quality of life in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer receiving first-line systemic therapy. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:520. [PMID: 37578590 PMCID: PMC10425291 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07963-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect of systemic therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer in daily clinical practice. This study assessed the HRQoL of patients with esophagogastric cancer during first-line systemic therapy, at disease progression, and after progression in a real-world context. METHODS Patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer (2014-2021) receiving first-line systemic therapy registered in the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Oesophageal-gastric cancer (POCOP) were included (n = 335). HRQoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25. Outcomes of mixed-effects models were presented as adjusted mean changes. RESULTS Results of the mixed-effect models showed the largest significant improvements during systemic therapy for odynophagia (- 18.9, p < 0.001), anxiety (- 18.7, p < 0.001), and dysphagia (- 13.8, p < 0.001) compared to baseline. After progression, global health status (- 6.3, p = 0.002) and cognitive (- 6.2, p = 0.001) and social functioning (- 9.7, p < 0.001) significantly worsened. At and after progression, physical (- 9.0, p < 0.001 and - 8.8, p < 0.001) and role functioning (- 15.2, p = 0.003 and - 14.7, p < 0.001) worsened, respectively. Trouble with taste worsened during systemic therapy (11.5, p < 0.001), at progression (12.0, p = 0.004), and after progression (15.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In general, HRQoL outcomes in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer improved during first-line therapy. Deterioration in outcomes was mainly observed at and after progression. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Identification of HRQoL aspects is important in shared decision-making and to inform patients on the impact of systemic therapy on their HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Pape
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dos Santos Cunha AC, Simon AG, Zander T, Buettner R, Bruns CJ, Schroeder W, Gebauer F, Quaas A. Dissecting the inflammatory tumor microenvironment of esophageal adenocarcinoma: mast cells and natural killer cells are favorable prognostic factors and associated with less extensive disease. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:6917-6929. [PMID: 36826594 PMCID: PMC10374824 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04650-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains a challenging and lethal cancer entity. A promising target for new therapeutic approaches, as demonstrated by the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors, are tumor-associated immune cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the understanding of the TME in esophageal cancer remains limited and requires further investigation. METHODS Over 900 EAC samples were included, including patients treated with primary surgery and neoadjuvant (radio-)chemotherapy. The immune cell infiltrates of mast cells (MC), natural killer cells (NK cells), plasma cells (PC), and eosinophilic cells (EC) were assessed semi-quantitatively and correlated with histopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A high presence of all four immune cell types significantly correlated with a less extensive tumor stage and a lower frequency of lymph node metastasis, and, in case of NK cells, with less distant metastasis. The presence of MC and NK cells was favorably associated with a prolonged OS in the total cohort (MC: p < 0.001; NK cells: p = 0.004) and patients without neoadjuvant treatment (MC: p < 0.001; NK cells: p = 0.01). NK cells were a favorable prognostic factor in the total cohort (p = 0.007) and in the treatment-naïve subgroup (p = 0.04). Additionally, MC were a favorable prognostic factor in patients with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION Our results indicate a complex and important role of mast cells, NK cells, and the other assessed immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of EAC. Therefore, they are one further step to a better understanding of the immune cell environment and the potential therapeutic implications in this cancer entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyne Condurú Dos Santos Cunha
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, DE-50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Adrian Georg Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, DE-50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Thomas Zander
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Reinhard Buettner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, DE-50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiane Josephine Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schroeder
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Gebauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, DE-50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pape M, Vissers PAJ, Dijksterhuis WPM, Bertwistle D, McDonald L, Mostert B, Derks S, Oving IM, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. Comparing treatment and outcomes in advanced esophageal,
gastroesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinomas: a population-based
study. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231162576. [PMID: 36970109 PMCID: PMC10031599 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231162576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) follows
the guidelines for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJC) and
gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), but patients with EAC are often excluded from
clinical studies of GEJC/GAC. Objectives: Here we describe treatment and survival of patients with advanced EAC, GEJC,
and GAC to provide population-based evidence on distinctions and
similarities between these populations. Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable advanced (cT4b) or
metastatic (cM1) EAC, GEJC, or GAC (2015–2020) were selected from the
Netherlands Cancer Registry. Methods: Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods, log-rank
tests, and multivariable Cox regression. Results: In all, 7391 patients were included (EAC: n = 3346, GEJC:
n = 1246, and GAC: n = 2798). Patients
with EAC were more often males and more often had ⩾2 metastatic locations.
First-line systemic therapy was received by 42%, 47%, and 36% of patients
with EAC, GEJC, and GAC, respectively. Median OS was 5.0, 5.1, and
4.0 months for all patients with EAC, GEJC, and GAC, respectively
(p < 0.001). Median OS from start of first-line
therapy of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
(HER2)-negative adenocarcinomas was 7.6, 7.8, and 7.5 months
(p = 0.12) and of patients with HER2-positive carcinoma
receiving first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy was 11.0, 13.3, and
9.5 months (p = 0.37) in EAC, GEJC, and GAC, respectively.
After multivariable adjustment, no difference in OS for patients with EAC,
GEJC, and GAC was observed. Conclusion: Despite differences in clinical characteristics and treatment strategies,
survival between patients with advanced EAC, GEJC, and GAC was similar. We
advocate that EAC patients should not be excluded from clinical trials for
patients with molecularly similar GEJC/GAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Pape
- Department of Research & Development,
Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the
Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam,
Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and
Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pauline A. J. Vissers
- Department of Research & Development,
Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the
Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University
Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Willemieke P. M. Dijksterhuis
- Department of Research & Development,
Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the
Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam,
Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and
Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Bertwistle
- Worldwide Health Economics & Outcomes
Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Laura McDonald
- Worldwide Health Economics & Outcomes
Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC
Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Derks
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and
Immunology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The
Netherlands
| | - Irma M. Oving
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H. A. Verhoeven
- Department of Research & Development,
Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the
Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of
Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and
Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuijper SC, Pape M, Haj Mohammad N, van Voorthuizen T, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. SOURCE beyond first-line: A survival prediction model for patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line palliative systemic therapy. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1202-1209. [PMID: 36451334 PMCID: PMC10107625 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Prior models have been developed to predict survival for patients with esophagogastric cancer undergoing curative treatment or first-line chemotherapy (SOURCE models). Comprehensive clinical prediction models for patients with esophagogastric cancer who will receive second-line chemotherapy or best supportive care are currently lacking. The aim of our study was to develop and internally validate a new clinical prediction model, called SOURCE beyond first-line, for survival of patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line palliative systemic therapy. Patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma (2015-2017) who received first-line systemic therapy (N = 1067) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics at primary diagnosis and at progression of disease were used to develop the model. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed through forward and backward selection using Akaike's Information Criterion. The model was internally validated through 10-fold cross-validations to assess performance. Model discrimination (C-index) and calibration (slope and intercept) were used to evaluate performance of the complete and cross-validated models. The final model consisted of 11 patient tumor and treatment characteristics. The C-index was 0.75 (0.73-0.78), calibration slope 1.01 (1.00-1.01) and calibration intercept 0.01 (0.01-0.02). Internal cross-validation of the model showed that the model performed adequately on unseen data: C-index was 0.79 (0.77-0.82), calibration slope 0.93 (0.85-1.01) and calibration intercept 0.02 (-0.01 to 0.06). The SOURCE beyond first-line model predicted survival with fair discriminatory ability and good calibration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C Kuijper
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pape
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pape M, Vissers PAJ, Bertwistle D, McDonald L, Beerepoot LV, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Lagarde SM, Mook S, Mohammad NH, Jeene PM, van Laarhoven HWM, Verhoeven RHA. Population-based study of treatment and outcome of recurrent oesophageal or junctional cancer. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1264-1273. [PMID: 35998093 PMCID: PMC10364682 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction have a high risk of recurrence after treatment with curative intent. The aim of this study was to analyse the site of recurrence, treatment, and survival in patients with recurrent disease. METHODS Patients with non-metastatic oesophageal or junctional carcinoma treated with curative intent between January 2015 and December 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data on recurrence were collected in the second half of 2019. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS In total, 862 of 1909 patients (45.2 per cent) for whom information on follow-up was available had disease recurrence, and 858 patients were included. Some 161 of 858 patients (18.8 per cent) had locoregional recurrence only, 415 (48.4 per cent) had distant recurrence only, and 282 (32.9 per cent) had combined locoregional and distant recurrence. In all, 518 of 858 patients (60.4 per cent) received best supportive care only and 315 (39.6 per cent) underwent tumour-directed therapy. Patients with locoregional recurrence alone more often received chemoradiotherapy than those with distant or combined locoregional and distant recurrence (19.3 per cent versus 0.7 and 2.8 per cent), and less often received systemic therapy (11.2 per cent versus 30.1 and 35.8 per cent). Median OS was 7.6, 4.2, and 3.3 months for patients with locoregional, distant, and combined locoregional and distant recurrence respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Disease recurred after curative treatment in 45.2 per cent of patients. Locoregional recurrence developed in only 18.8 per cent. The vast majority of patients presented with distant or combined locoregional and distant recurrence, and received best supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Pape
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - David Bertwistle
- Worldwide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Laura McDonald
- Centre for Observational Research and Data Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Laurens V Beerepoot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul M Jeene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jeene PM, Kuijper SC, van den Boorn HG, El Sharouni SY, Braam PM, Oppedijk V, Verhoeven RHA, Hulshof MCCM, van Laarhoven HWM. Improving survival prediction of oesophageal cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy for dysphagia. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:849-855. [PMID: 35651320 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2079385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The recent POLDER trial investigated the effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on dysphagia caused by incurable oesophageal cancer. An estimated life expectancy of minimally three months was required for inclusion. However, nearly one-third of the included patients died within three months. The aim of this study was to investigate if the use of prediction models could have improved the physician's estimation of the patient's survival. METHODS Data from the POLDER trial (N = 110) were linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry to retrieve patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics. Two published prediction models (the SOURCE model and Steyerberg model) were used to predict three-month survival for all patients included in the POLDER trial. Predicted survival probabilities were dichotomised and the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive performance. RESULTS The SOURCE and Steyerberg model had an accuracy of 79% and 64%, and an AUC of 0.76 and 0.60 (p = .017), respectively. The SOURCE model had higher specificity across survival cut-off probabilities, the Steyerberg model had a higher sensitivity beyond the survival probability cut-off of 0.7. Using optimal cut-off probabilities, SOURCE would have wrongfully included 16/110 patients into the POLDER and Steyerberg 34/110. CONCLUSION The SOURCE model was found to be a more useful decision aid than the Steyerberg model. Results showed that the SOURCE model could be used for three-month survival predictions for patients that are considered for palliative treatment of dysphagia caused by oesophageal cancer in addition to clinicians' judgement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Jeene
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Steven C. Kuijper
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Héctor G. van den Boorn
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sherif Y. El Sharouni
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pètra M. Braam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Vera Oppedijk
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H. A. Verhoeven
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pape M, Vissers PAJ, Bertwistle D, McDonald L, Slingerland M, Haj Mohammad N, Beerepoot LV, Ruurda JP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Jeene PM, van Laarhoven HWM, Verhoeven RHA. A population-based study in synchronous versus metachronous metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221085557. [PMID: 35356260 PMCID: PMC8958715 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221085557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Real-world data on treatment and outcomes in patients with synchronous metastatic disease compared with patients with metachronous metastatic disease in esophagogastric cancer have not been published before. The aim of our study was to explore treatment, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment fialure (TTF) in patients with synchronous and metachronous metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with synchronous metastatic disease (2015–2017) and patients with metachronous metastatic disease initially treated with curative intent for nonmetastatic disease (2015–2016) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. OS and TTF were assessed from metastatic diagnosis for patients with synchronous, early metachronous (⩽6 months) or late metachronous (>6 months) metastatic disease using Kaplan–Meier curves with two-sided log-rank test. Results: Median OS was 4.2, 2.1, and 4.4 months in patients with synchronous, early metachronous, and late metachronous metastatic disease, respectively (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving systemic treatment was 41.3%, 21.5%, and 32.5% for synchronous, early metachronous, and late metachronous metastatic disease, respectively (p = 0.001). Among patients receiving systemic treatment, median OS was 8.8, 4.5, and 9.1 months (p < 0.001) and median TTF was 6.1, 3.8, and 5.7 months (p < 0.001) in synchronous, early metachronous, and late metachronous metastatic disease, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with early metachronous metastatic disease have a worse survival compared with patients with synchronous or late metachronous metastatic disease. These patients less often receive systemic treatment, and even when treated, survival is worse compared with patients with synchronous or late metachronous metastatic disease, suggesting a more aggressive tumor behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Pape
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline A. J. Vissers
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - David Bertwistle
- Worldwide Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Laura McDonald
- Centre for Observational Research & Data Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laurens V. Beerepoot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul M. Jeene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H. A. Verhoeven
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A population-based study on treatment and outcomes in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed with distant interval metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1964-1971. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
11
|
Midthun L, Kim S, Hendifar A, Osipov A, Klempner SJ, Chao J, Cho M, Guan M, Placencio-Hickok VR, Gangi A, Burch M, Lin DC, Waters K, Atkins K, Kamrava M, Gong J. Chemotherapy predictors and a time-dependent chemotherapy effect in metastatic esophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:511-524. [PMID: 35317320 PMCID: PMC8919005 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i2.511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy has long been shown to confer a survival benefit in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. However, not all patients with metastatic disease receive chemotherapy.
AIM To evaluate a large cancer database of metastatic esophageal cancer cases to identify predictors of receipt to chemotherapy and survival.
METHODS We interrogated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004-2015 and included patients with M1 disease who had received or did not receive chemotherapy. A logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between chemotherapy and potential confounders and a Cox proportional hazards model was employed to examine the effect of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS). Propensity score analyses were further performed to balance measurable confounders between patients treated with and without chemotherapy.
RESULTS A total of 29182 patients met criteria for inclusion in this analysis, with 21911 (75%) receiving chemotherapy and 7271 (25%) not receiving chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 69.45 mo. The median OS for patients receiving chemotherapy was 9.53 mo (9.33-9.72) vs 2.43 mo (2.27-2.60) with no chemotherapy. Year of diagnosis 2010-2014 [odds ratio (OR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-1.43, P value < 0.001], median income > $46000 (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.27-1.75, P value < 0.001), and node-positivity (OR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.20-1.52, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of receiving chemotherapy, while female gender (OR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.76-0.98, P = 0.019), black race (OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.67-0.93, P = 0.005), uninsured status (OR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.33-0.52, P < 0.001), and high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (OR for CCI ≥ 2: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.50-0.74, P < 0.001) predicted for lower odds of receiving chemotherapy. Modeling the effect of chemotherapy on OS using a time-dependent coefficient showed that chemotherapy was associated with improved OS up to 10 mo, after which there is no significant effect on OS. Moreover, uninsured status [hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95%CI: 1.09-1.31, P < 0.001], being from the geographic Midwest (HR: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.01-1.14, P = 0.032), high CCI (HR for CCI ≥ 2: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.07-1.26, P < 0.001), and higher tumor grade (HR for grade 3 vs grade 1: 1.28, 95%CI: 1.14-1.44, P < 0.001) and higher T stage (HR for T1 vs T4: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.84-0.95, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of worse OS on multivariable analyses.
CONCLUSION In this large, retrospective NCDB analysis, we identified several socioeconomic and clinicopathologic predictors for receiving chemotherapy and OS in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. The benefit of chemotherapy on OS is time-dependent and favors early initiation. Focused outreach in lower income and underinsured patients is critical as receipt of chemotherapy is associated with improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Midthun
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Sungjin Kim
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Arsen Osipov
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Joseph Chao
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - May Cho
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States
| | - Michelle Guan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | | | - Alexandra Gangi
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Miguel Burch
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - De-Chen Lin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Kevin Waters
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Katelyn Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Catenacci DVT, Chung HC, Shen L, Moehler M, Yoon HH, Rosales MK, Kang YK. Safety and efficacy of HER2 blockade by trastuzumab-based chemotherapy-containing combination strategies in HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100360. [PMID: 34973512 PMCID: PMC8728435 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Since completion of the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer study, trastuzumab with doublet chemotherapy (a fluoropyrimidine and a platinum) has been the gold-standard first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The safety and efficacy of 23 studies of first-line trastuzumab plus doublet chemotherapy, without checkpoint inhibitors (n = 19) or with checkpoint inhibitors (n = 4), conducted in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GEA, including phase II/III, prospective, and retrospective observational studies, were summarized. In studies without checkpoint inhibitors, the median duration of trastuzumab treatment ranged from 19.5 to 39.0 weeks and from 15.3 to 30.0 weeks for chemotherapy. In studies with checkpoint inhibitors, the median duration of pembrolizumab/trastuzumab/chemotherapy was 30 weeks, and 18 weeks for chemotherapy. In studies without checkpoint inhibitors, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade ≥3 ranged from 32% to 84%. Serious adverse events (SAEs) ranged from 15% to 39%. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation ranged from 0% to 30%. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0%-9% of patients. In studies with checkpoint inhibitors, TEAEs of grade ≥3 were 57%. SAEs ranged from 31% to 38%. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation ranged from 5% to 24%. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0%-3% of patients. In studies without checkpoint inhibitors, objective response rate (ORR) ranged from 39% to 82%, median progression-free survival (PFS) from 5.7 to 11.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) from 11.2 to 27.6 months. In studies with checkpoint inhibitors, ORR ranged from 39% to 86%, median PFS from 8.0 to 13.0 months, and median OS from 19.3 to 27.3 months. This review provides a historical benchmark on safety and efficacy of available first-line chemotherapy-based standard of care for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D V T Catenacci
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
| | - H C Chung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - L Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - M Moehler
- Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - H H Yoon
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | | | - Y-K Kang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pape M, Vissers PAJ, de Vos-Geelen J, Hulshof MCCM, Gisbertz SS, Jeene PM, van Laarhoven HWM, Verhoeven RHA. Treatment patterns and survival in advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell cancer: a population-based study. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:1038-1046. [PMID: 34986523 PMCID: PMC8898723 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Data on treatment and survival of patients with advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from Western populations are limited. Here we describe treatment and survival in patients with advanced unresectable ESCC: patients with cT4b disease without metastases (cT4b), metastases limited to the supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLNM) or distant metastatic ESCC at population level. All patients with unresectable (cT4b) or synchronous metastatic ESCC at primary diagnosis (2015-2018) or patients with metachronous metastases after primary non-metastatic diagnosis in 2015-2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Fifteen percent of patients had cT4b disease (n=146), 12% SCLNM (n=118) and 72% distant metastases (n=681). Median OS was 6.3, 11.2 and 4.4 months in patients with cT4b, SCLNM and distant metastases, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression showed that patients with cT4b (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-1.99) and patients with distant metastases (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.12-1.80) had a worse survival compared to patients with SCLNM. Among patients who received chemoradiotherapy and/or underwent resection (primary tumor and/or metastases), median OS was 11.9, 16.1 and 14.0 months in patients with cT4b, SCLNM and distant metastases, respectively (P=0.76). Patients with SCLNM had a better survival compared to patients with cT4b and patients with distant metastases. Survival of patients with advanced unresectable ESCC in clinical practice was poor, even in patients treated with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Pape
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul M Jeene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Radiotherapiegroep, location Deventer, Nico, Bolkesteinlaan 85, 7416 SE, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Velzen MJM, Creemers A, van den Ende T, Schokker S, Krausz S, Reinten RJ, Dijk F, van Noesel CJM, Halfwerk H, Meijer SL, Mearadji B, Derks S, Bijlsma MF, van Laarhoven HWM. Circulating tumor DNA predicts outcome in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:906-915. [PMID: 35763187 PMCID: PMC9365750 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-022-01313-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has predictive and prognostic value in localized and metastatic cancer. This study analyzed the prognostic value of baseline and on-treatment ctDNA in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGEC) using a region-specific next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. METHODS Cell free DNA was isolated from plasma of patients before start of first-line palliative systemic treatment and after 9 and 18 weeks. Two NGS panels were designed comprising the most frequently mutated genes and targetable mutations in GEC. Tumor-derived mutations in matched metastatic biopsies were used to validate that the sequencing panels assessed true tumor-derived variants. Tumor volumes were calculated from baseline CT scans and correlated to variant allele frequency (VAF). Survival analyses were performed using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS ctDNA was detected in pretreatment plasma in 75% of 72 patients and correlated well with mutations in metastatic biopsies (86% accordance). The VAF correlated with baseline tumor volume (Pearson's R 0.53, p < 0.0001). Detection of multiple gene mutations at baseline in plasma was associated with worse overall survival (OS, HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10-4.28; p = 0.027) and progression free survival (PFS, HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.28-5.73; p = 0.009). OS and PFS were inferior in patients with residual detectable ctDNA after 9 weeks of treatment (OS: HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.53-16.04; p = 0.008; PFS: HR 4.08, 95% CI 1.31-12.75; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION Based on our NGS panel, the number of ctDNA mutations before start of first-line chemotherapy has prognostic value. Moreover, residual ctDNA after three cycles of systemic treatment is associated with inferior survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel J. M. van Velzen
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aafke Creemers
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.7177.60000000084992262Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van den Ende
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandor Schokker
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Krausz
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy J. Reinten
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carel J. M. van Noesel
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Halfwerk
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sybren L. Meijer
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Banafsche Mearadji
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Derks
- grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F. Bijlsma
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gertsen EC, Brenkman HJF, van Hillegersberg R, van Sandick JW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Lanschot JJB, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Stoot JHMB, Hulsewe KWE, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, van der Peet DL, Daams F, van Grieken NCT, Heisterkamp J, van Etten B, van den Berg JW, Pierie JP, Eker HH, Thijssen AY, Belt EJT, van Duijvendijk P, Wassenaar E, van Laarhoven HWM, Wevers KP, Hol L, Wessels FJ, Haj Mohammad N, van der Meulen MP, Frederix GWJ, Vegt E, Siersema PD, Ruurda JP. 18F-Fludeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy for Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Dutch Cohort Study (PLASTIC). JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e215340. [PMID: 34705049 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance The optimal staging for gastric cancer remains a matter of debate. Objective To evaluate the value of 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) in addition to initial staging by means of gastroscopy and CT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter prospective, observational cohort study included 394 patients with locally advanced, clinically curable gastric adenocarcinoma (≥cT3 and/or N+, M0 category based on CT) between August 1, 2017, and February 1, 2020. Exposures All patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT and/or SL in addition to initial staging. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the number of patients in whom the intent of treatment changed based on the results of these 2 investigations. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic performance, number of incidental findings on FDG-PET/CT, morbidity and mortality after SL, and diagnostic delay. Results Of the 394 patients included, 256 (65%) were men and mean (SD) age was 67.6 (10.7) years. A total of 382 patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and 357 underwent SL. Treatment intent changed from curative to palliative in 65 patients (16%) based on the additional FDG-PET/CT and SL findings. FDG-PET/CT detected distant metastases in 12 patients (3%), and SL detected peritoneal or locally nonresectable disease in 73 patients (19%), with an overlap of 7 patients (2%). FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 33% (95% CI, 17%-53%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%) in detecting distant metastases. Secondary findings on FDG/PET were found in 83 of 382 patients (22%), which led to additional examinations in 65 of 394 patients (16%). Staging laparoscopy resulted in a complication requiring reintervention in 3 patients (0.8%) without postoperative mortality. The mean (SD) diagnostic delay was 19 (14) days. Conclusions and Relevance This study's findings suggest an apparently limited additional value of FDG-PET/CT; however, SL added considerably to the staging process of locally advanced gastric cancer by detection of peritoneal and nonresectable disease. Therefore, it may be useful to include SL in guidelines for staging advanced gastric cancer, but not FDG-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Gertsen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, the Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Karel W E Hulsewe
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT hospital, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | | | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth Twee-Steden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem van den Berg
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jean Pierre Pierie
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Hasan H Eker
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Y Thijssen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eelco Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Oesophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients (POCOP) of the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Group, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kevin P Wevers
- Department of Surgery, Isala Ziekenhuis, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam P van der Meulen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoefnagel SJM, Boonstra JJ, Russchen MJAM, Krishnadath KK. Towards Personalized Treatment Strategies for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; A Review on the Molecular Characterization of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Current Research Efforts on Individualized Curative Treatment Regimens. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4881. [PMID: 34638363 PMCID: PMC8508226 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancers confer a major health challenge and are highly aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis. Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the two major histopathological subtypes of esophageal cancer. Despite advances in treatment modalities, the prognosis of patients with EAC remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate that rarely exceeds 30% in patients treated with curative intent. Chemoradiotherapy followed by resection is the treatment of choice for EAC patients, which are deemed to be curable. Current patient stratification and treatments are based on outcomes from clinical trials. Unfortunately, the molecular heterogeneity of EAC which determines the chemo- and radiosensitivity of these cancers are not taken into account. A more personalized approach in the treatment of EAC could improve patient outcomes. This review aims at summarizing literature on translational and clinical research in the field of EAC which could be of importance to develop personalized approaches. As suggested by the TCGA, expression data features molecular classifications by different platforms, including miRNA, genomic mutations and reverse-phase protein arrays. Here, we summarize literature on transcriptomic, data-driven approaches to identify distinct subtypes of EAC associated with molecular features. These novel classifications may determine the responsiveness to chemo(radio)therapy and help to identify novel molecular targets within cell signaling pathways. Moreover, we discuss the current clinical research efforts on tailored treatment regimens for patients with EAC taking into account the heterogeneous response to chemoradiotherapy. We summarize the evidence regarding active surveillance instead of immediate surgical resection after application of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in EAC. We consider that in future patients with complete response to chemo(radio)therapy, predicted by (transcriptomic) biomarkers, might benefit most from this approach. Finally, challenges to overcome for current findings to be implemented in clinical practice and move the field forward are being discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne J. M. Hoefnagel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J. Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden UMC, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Kausilia K. Krishnadath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Paediatrics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Velzen MJM, Pape M, Dijksterhuis WPM, Slingerland M, van Voorthuizen T, Beerepoot LV, Creemers GJ, Derks S, Mohammad NH, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. The association between effectiveness of first-line treatment and second-line treatment in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2021; 156:60-69. [PMID: 34425405 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based predictive factors for the effectiveness of second-line palliative systemic therapy in gastro-oesophageal cancer are not available. This study investigates the predictive value of effectiveness of first-line treatment for second-line treatment outcomes in gastro-oesophageal cancer in a real-world setting. METHODS Patients with metastatic gastro-oesophageal cancer diagnosed in 2010-2017 who were treated with second-line therapy after disease progression on first-line therapy were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into four groups as per duration of time to treatment failure (TTF) of the first line (0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and >9 months), and the association with overall survival (OS) and second-line TTF was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and two-sided multivariable regression models. RESULTS Median OS since the start of the second line of patients (n = 611) with first-line TTF of 0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and >9 months was 4.0, 4.1, 5.5 and 7.1 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median second-line TTF of patients with first-line TTF of 0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and >9 months was 2.8, 2.4, 3.0 and 4.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients with first-line TTF of >9 months showed a longer OS than patients with first-line TTF of 0-3 months (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-2.47), 3-6 months (adjusted HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.47-2.39) and 6-9 months (adjusted HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04-1.65). Results for second-line TTF were similar. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a positive correlation between effectiveness of first-line therapy and outcomes of second-line therapy in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Physicians should take duration of the first line into account when considering second-line palliative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel J M van Velzen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marieke Pape
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willemieke P M Dijksterhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Laurens V Beerepoot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Derks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia H Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Koemans WJ, Lurvink RJ, Grootscholten C, Verhoeven RHA, de Hingh IH, van Sandick JW. Synchronous peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer origin: incidence, treatment and survival of a nationwide Dutch cohort. Gastric Cancer 2021; 24:800-809. [PMID: 33495964 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01160-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The peritoneum is a predilection site for gastric cancer metastases. Current standard treatment for gastric cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases is palliative systemic therapy. However, its efficacy is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, treatment and survival patterns of gastric cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases in the Netherlands. METHODS All newly diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases between 1999 and 2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Incidence, treatment and survival patterns were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 3,773 patients were identified from the NCR. The incidence of synchronous peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients increased from 18% in 2008 to 27% in 2017. The use of systemic therapy increased from 15% in 1999-2002 to 43% in 2013-2017 (p < 0.001). The median survival of the entire cohort did not significantly increase over time. Median survival of patients treated with systemic therapy increased from 7.4 months in 1999-2002 to 9.4 months in 2013-2017 (p = 0.005). In contrast, median survival of patients not treated with systemic therapy decreased from 3.3 months in 1999-2002 to 2.1 months in 2013-2017 (p < 0.001). Some clinical and pathological data such as the extent of the peritoneal metastases were not available. CONCLUSION Synchronous peritoneal metastases are increasingly diagnosed in gastric cancer patients. In recent years, more patients were treated with systemic treatment and survival of these patients increased. However, as survival of the entire group did not improve over time, the effect of systemic therapy remains unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem J Koemans
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Petersen PC, Petersen LN, Vogelius I, Bjerregaard JK, Baeksgaard L. A randomized phase 2 trial of first-line docetaxel, carboplatin, capecitabine (CTX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (EOX) in advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:948-953. [PMID: 34086514 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1928281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No preferred first-line chemotherapy regimen exists for advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Addition of docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been shown to improve survival but is associated with increased toxicity. In this randomized, non-comparative phase 2 trial, we tested carboplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine (CTX), a potentially useful modification of DCF (NCT02177552). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced HER2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma not previously treated in the first-line setting were randomized to intravenous docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC5 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bd days 1-14, q4w (CTX) or intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 625 mg/m2 bd days 1-21, q3w (epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine [EOX]). Treatment continued until progression, intolerance or for a maximum of nine cycles. The primary endpoint was 1-year survival for patients treated with CTX. RESULTS Between June 2014 and January 2019, a total of 98 eligible patients were randomized. The 1-year survival rate was 34.7% (95% CI 21.8 - 47.9) with CTX and 36.7% (95% CI 23.6 - 50.0) with EOX. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months (95% CI 5.5 - 7.1) and 9.8 months (95% CI 8.2 - 11.0) with CTX and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.3 - 7.0) and 10.2 months (95% CI 8.0 - 11.9) with EOX, respectively. Related grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 86% of patients on CTX and 69% on EOX. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 31.4% of patients on CTX and 13.7% on EOX. CONCLUSIONS First-line CTX showed insufficient efficacy and caused a high rate of febrile neutropenia. CTX could not, therefore, be recommended for further study. This trial adds to current knowledge of docetaxel combined with platinum and 5-FU: that the combination is associated with increased toxicity and its use should be limited to fit patients in need of a response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ivan Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Clercq NC, van den Ende T, Prodan A, Hemke R, Davids M, Pedersen HK, Nielsen HB, Groen AK, de Vos WM, van Laarhoven HWM, Nieuwdorp M. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:3784-3792. [PMID: 33883174 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome, associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, and is influenced by the gut microbiota. We investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on cachexia and treatment response in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial performed in the Amsterdam University Medical Center, we assigned 24 cachectic patients with metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal cancer to either allogenic FMT (healthy obese donor) or autologous FMT, prior to palliative chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Primary objective was to assess the effect of allogenic FMT on satiety. Secondary outcomes were other features of cachexia, along with disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Finally, exploratory analyses were performed on the effect of FMT on gut microbiota composition (metagenomic sequencing) and metabolites (untargeted metabolomics). RESULTS Allogenic FMT did not improve any of the cachexia outcomes. Patients in the allogenic group (n = 12) had a higher DCR at 12 weeks (P = 0.035) compared with the autologous group (n = 12), longer median OS of 365 versus 227 days [HR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-1.05; P = 0.057] and PFS of 204 versus 93 days (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.21-1.20; P = 0.092). Patients in the allogenic group showed a significant shift in fecal microbiota composition after FMT (P = 0.010) indicating proper engraftment of the donor microbiota. CONCLUSIONS FMT from a healthy obese donor prior to first-line chemotherapy did not affect cachexia, but may have improved response and survival in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. These results provide a rational for larger FMT trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolien C de Clercq
- Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Tom van den Ende
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Andrei Prodan
- Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Hemke
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Davids
- Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - A K Groen
- Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willem M de Vos
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.,Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Max Nieuwdorp
- Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Haffner I, Schierle K, Raimúndez E, Geier B, Maier D, Hasenauer J, Luber B, Walch A, Kolbe K, Riera Knorrenschild J, Kretzschmar A, Rau B, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Ahlborn M, Siegler G, Fuxius S, Decker T, Wittekind C, Lordick F. HER2 Expression, Test Deviations, and Their Impact on Survival in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Results From the Prospective Multicenter VARIANZ Study. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1468-1478. [PMID: 33764808 PMCID: PMC8099392 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Trastuzumab is the only approved targeted drug for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). However, not all patients respond and most eventually progress. The multicenter VARIANZ study aimed to investigate the background of response and resistance to trastuzumab in mGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivonne Haffner
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Katrin Schierle
- Institute of Pathology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elba Raimúndez
- Center for Mathematics, Chair of Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.,Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Hasenauer
- Center for Mathematics, Chair of Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.,Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Computational Biology, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Luber
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Walch
- Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Kolbe
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Beate Rau
- Department of General Surgery, Charité University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Miriam Ahlborn
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Gabriele Siegler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fuxius
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Decker
- Studienzentrum Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | | | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology and Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kroese TE, Dijksterhuis WPM, van Rossum PSN, Verhoeven RHA, Mook S, Haj Mohammad N, Hulshof MCCM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Oijen MGH, Ruurda JP, van Laarhoven HWM, van Hillegersberg R. Prognosis of Interval Distant Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 113:482-490. [PMID: 33610543 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In esophageal cancer patients, distant metastases develop between the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and planned surgery, so-called interval metastases. The primary aim of this study was to assess management, overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for OS in these patients. A secondary aim was to compare OS with synchronous metastatic patients. METHODS Esophageal cancer patients with interval distant metastases were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (2010 to 2017). Management was categorized into metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), primary tumor resection, or best supportive care (BSC). The OS was calculated from the diagnosis of the primary tumor. Prognostic factors affecting OS were studied using Cox proportional hazard models. Propensity score-matching (1:3) generated matched cases with synchronous distant metastases. RESULTS In all, 208 patients with interval metastases were identified: in 87 patients (42%) MDT was initiated; in 10%, primary tumor resection only; in 7%, primary tumor resection plus MDT; and in 41%, BSC. Median OS was 10 months (interquartile range, 8.6 to 11.1). Compared with BSC, superior OS was independently associated with MDT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.49), primary tumor resection (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.94), and primary tumor resection plus MDT (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.38). Worse OS was independently associated with signet ring cell carcinoma (HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.28) and poor differentiation grade (HR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.35 to 2.83). The OS was comparable between matched patients with interval and synchronous distant metastases (10.2 versus 9.4 months, P = .760). CONCLUSIONS In esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with interval distant metastases, the OS was poor and comparable to that of synchronous metastatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiuri E Kroese
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Willemieke P M Dijksterhuis
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn G H van Oijen
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
The metastatic pattern of intestinal and diffuse type gastric carcinoma - A Dutch national cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 69:101846. [PMID: 33126042 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Lauren classification of gastric adenocarcinoma describes three histological subtypes, the intestinal, the diffuse and the mixed type carcinoma. The metastatic pattern of gastric adenocarcinoma by histological subtype has not been studied. METHODS Gastric adenocarcinoma patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis between 1999 and 2017 were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The Lauren classification was determined based on pathology reports archived in the Dutch Pathology Registry and was linked to individual cases in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. RESULTS Among 8 231 newly diagnosed, metastatic and evaluable gastric adenocarcinoma patients, 57 % had an intestinal type carcinoma, 38 % patients had a diffuse type carcinoma and 5 % had a mixed type carcinoma. Intestinal type carcinomas more often metastasized to the liver (57 % versus 21 %, p < 0.0001) and lungs (13 % versus 7 %, p < 0.0001), whereas diffuse type carcinomas more often metastasized to the peritoneum (58 % versus 29 %, p < 0.0001) and bones (9 % versus 6 %, p < 0.0001). Patients with a diffuse type carcinoma had a worse survival perspective regardless of the number or the location of the metastases. CONCLUSION In this national cohort study, metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma of the intestinal type had a predilection for the liver and that of the diffuse type for the peritoneum.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim S, DiPeri TP, Guan M, Placencio-Hickok VR, Kim H, Liu JY, Hendifar A, Klempner SJ, Nipp R, Gangi A, Burch M, Waters K, Cho M, Chao J, Atkins K, Kamrava M, Tuli R, Gong J. Impact of palliative therapies in metastatic esophageal cancer patients not receiving chemotherapy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12:377-389. [PMID: 33024512 PMCID: PMC7520571 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i9.377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative therapy has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) in several tumor types. Not all patients with metastatic esophageal cancer receive palliative chemotherapy, and the roles of other palliative therapies in these patients are limited.
AIM To investigate the impact of other palliative therapies in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer not receiving chemotherapy.
METHODS The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients between 2004-2015. Patients with M1 disease who declined chemotherapy and had known palliative therapy status [palliative therapies were defined as surgery, radiotherapy (RT), pain management, or any combination thereof] were included. Cases with unknown chemotherapy, RT, or nonprimary surgery status were excluded. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were calculated. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine factors influencing survival.
RESULTS Among 140234 esophageal cancer cases, we identified 1493 patients who did not receive chemotherapy and had complete data. Median age was 70 years, most (66.3%) had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0, and 37.1% were treated at an academic center. The majority (72.7%) did not receive other palliative therapies. On both univariate and multivariable analyses, there was no difference in OS between those receiving other palliative therapy (median 2.83 mo, 95%CI: 2.53-3.12) vs no palliative therapy (2.37 no, 95%CI: 2.2-2.56; multivariable P = 0.290). On univariate, but not multivariable analysis, treatment at an academic center was predictive of improved OS [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95%CI: 0.80-1.00; P = 0.047]. On multivariable analysis, female sex (HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.71-0.92) and non-black, other race compared to white race (HR 0.72, 95%CI: 0.56-0.93) were associated with reduced mortality, while South geographic region relative to West region (HR 1.23, 95%CI: 1.04-1.46) and CCI of 1 relative to CCI of 0 (HR 1.17, 95%CI: 1.03-1.32) were associated with increased mortality. Higher histologic grade and T-stage were also associated with worse OS (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION Palliative therapies other than chemotherapy conferred a numerically higher, but not statistically significant difference in OS among patients with metastatic esophageal cancer not receiving chemotherapy. Quality of life metrics, inpatient status, and subgroup analyses are important for examining the role of palliative therapies other than chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal cancer and future studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungjin Kim
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Timothy P DiPeri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Michelle Guan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Veronica R Placencio-Hickok
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Haesoo Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Jar-Yee Liu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Ryan Nipp
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Alexandra Gangi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Miguel Burch
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Kevin Waters
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - May Cho
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States
| | - Joseph Chao
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - Katelyn Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Richard Tuli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Puhr HC, Preusser M, Prager G, Ilhan-Mutlu A. New Treatment Options for Advanced Gastroesophageal Tumours: Mature for the Current Practice? Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E301. [PMID: 32012895 PMCID: PMC7072704 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Several clinical trials attempted to identify novel treatment options for advanced gastroesophageal tumours in first, second and further lines. Although results of targeted therapy regimens were mainly disappointing, novel immunotherapy agents showed promising activity, which led to their approval in second and third lines in many countries. This review focuses on the results of recent clinical trials investigating novel agents including targeted therapies, immunotherapy components and chemotherapies and discuss their current impact as well as current approval status on the treatment armamentarium of advanced gastroesophageal tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Christina Puhr
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (H.C.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna—Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (H.C.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna—Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerald Prager
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (H.C.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna—Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; (H.C.P.); (M.P.); (G.P.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna—Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dijksterhuis WPM, Verhoeven RHA, Meijer SL, Slingerland M, Haj Mohammad N, de Vos-Geelen J, Beerepoot LV, van Voorthuizen T, Creemers GJ, van Oijen MGH, van Laarhoven HWM. Increased assessment of HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Gastric Cancer 2020; 23:579-590. [PMID: 31927675 PMCID: PMC7305095 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-020-01039-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Addition of trastuzumab to first-line palliative chemotherapy in gastroesophageal cancer patients with HER2 overexpression has shown to improve survival. Real-world data on HER2 assessment and administration of trastuzumab are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess HER2 testing, trastuzumab administration, and overall survival (OS) in a nationwide cohort of metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients. METHODS Data of patients with synchronous metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma diagnosed in 2010-2016 that received palliative systemic treatment (n = 2846) were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and Dutch Pathology Registry. The ToGA trial criteria were used to determine HER2 overexpression. Proportions of HER2 tested patients were analyzed between hospital volume categories using Chi-square tests, and over time using trend analysis. OS was tested using the Kaplan Meier method with log rank test. RESULTS HER2 assessment increased annually, from 18% in 2010 to 88% in 2016 (P < 0.01). Median OS increased from 6.9 (2010-2013) to 7.9 months (2014-2016; P < 0.05). Between the hospitals, the proportion of tested patients varied between 29-100%, and was higher in high-volume hospitals (P < 0.01). Overall, 77% of the HER2 positive patients received trastuzumab. Median OS was higher in patients with positive (8.8 months) and negative (7.4 months) HER2 status, compared to non-tested patients (5.6 months; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Increased determination of HER2 and administration of trastuzumab have changed daily practice management of metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients receiving palliative systemic therapy, and possibly contributed to their improved survival. Further increase in awareness of HER2 testing and trastuzumab administration may improve quality of care and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemieke P. M. Dijksterhuis
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.470266.10000 0004 0501 9982Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H. A. Verhoeven
- grid.470266.10000 0004 0501 9982Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sybren L. Meijer
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- grid.412966.e0000 0004 0480 1382Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Laurens V. Beerepoot
- grid.416373.4Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Theo van Voorthuizen
- grid.415930.aDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- grid.413532.20000 0004 0398 8384Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn G. H. van Oijen
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.470266.10000 0004 0501 9982Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|