1
|
Ross TL, Na R, Au-Yeung G, DeFazio A, Friedlander M, Sivakumaran T, Livingstone K, Nagle CM, O'Neill H, Williams M, Webb PM, Beesley VL. Are exercise and sitting time during chemotherapy for ovarian cancer associated with treatment-related side-effects, chemotherapy completion and survival? Gynecol Oncol 2024; 190:53-61. [PMID: 39146755 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.07.684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate if exercise and sitting time during chemotherapy were associated with chemotherapy side-effects, completion of planned chemotherapy and survival. METHODS We used data from the Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle (OPAL) Study, a national prospective cohort of adults with newly-diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer. At 3-monthly questionnaires we asked about exercise and sitting time in the past week, and treatment-related side-effects. Details about treatment, toxicities, progression and death were abstracted from medical records. We used linear, logistic and Cox regression, respectively, to assess associations between both exercise and sitting time, and chemotherapy side-effects and completion (≥85% relative dose intensity) and survival. RESULTS 503 eligible participants were included in one or more analyses. Patients participating in higher-intensity exercise (≥30 min of moderate-vigorous exercise/week; 24%) reported significantly better Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness/Cancer Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue (32.2 vs. 26.7) and FACT-Trial Outcome Index (69.4 vs. 61.7) scores, and were less likely to have clinician-reported moderate-severe neurotoxicity (odds ratio [OR]:0.50; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]:0.29-0.88), than minimal exercisers (<30 min moderate-vigorous exercise/week & <120 min walking/week; 52%). Participating in higher-intensity exercise was also possibly associated with greater chemotherapy completion (OR:1.70; 95%CI:0.90-3.20), particularly for paclitaxel. Sitting time was not associated with chemotherapy completion. For patients with advanced disease who underwent cytoreduction and received first-line carboplatin and paclitaxel, there was a suggestion higher-intensity exercise during chemotherapy may improve survival (HR:0.68; 95%CI:0.47-1.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients with ovarian cancer who carry out moderate-vigorous exercise during chemotherapy have fewer side-effects and potentially better completion of planned chemotherapy and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya L Ross
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Renhua Na
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - George Au-Yeung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Friedlander
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tharani Sivakumaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | | | - Christina M Nagle
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - Penelope M Webb
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Vanessa L Beesley
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nagle CM, Ibiebele TI, Bandera EV, Cramer D, Doherty JA, Giles GG, Goodman MT, Hanley GE, Harris HR, Jensen A, Kjaer SK, Lee AW, Milne RL, Qin B, Richardson J, Sasamoto N, Sieh W, Terry KL, Titus L, Trabert B, Wentzensen N, Wu AH, Berchuck A, Pike M, Pearce CL, Webb PM. Pre-diagnosis tea and coffee consumption and survival after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Br J Cancer 2024:10.1038/s41416-024-02792-7. [PMID: 39026080 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02792-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tea and coffee are the most frequently consumed beverages in the world. Green tea in particular contains compounds with potential anti-cancer effects, but its association with survival after ovarian cancer is uncertain. METHODS We investigated the associations between tea and coffee consumption before diagnosis and survival using data from 10 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Data on tea (green, black, herbal), coffee and caffeine intake were available for up to 5724 women. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Compared with women who did not drink any green tea, consumption of one or more cups/day was associated with better overall survival (aHR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-1.00, p-trend = 0.04). A similar association was seen for ovarian cancer-specific survival in five studies with this information (aHR = 0.81, 0.66-0.99, p-trend = 0.045). There was no consistent variation between subgroups defined by clinical or lifestyle characteristics and adjustment for other aspects of lifestyle did not appreciably alter the estimates. We found no evidence of an association between coffee, black or herbal tea, or caffeine intake and survival. CONCLUSION The observed association with green tea consumption before diagnosis raises the possibility that consumption after diagnosis might improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Grants
- NIH-K07-CA095666, R01-CA83918, NIH-K22-CA138563, P30-CA072720 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- R01-CA54419, P50-CA105009 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- R01-CA112523, R01-CA87538 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- R01-CA58598, N01-CN-55424, N01-PC-67001 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- R01-CA61107 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- R01-CA61107 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- R01-CA54419, P50-CA105009 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- P01-CA17054, P30-CA14089, R01-CA61132, N01-PC67010, R03-CA113148, R03-CA115195, N01-CN025403 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (Cancer Institute of New Jersey)
- W81XWH-10-1-02802 U.S. Department of Defense (United States Department of Defense)
- W81XWH-10-1-02802 U.S. Department of Defense (United States Department of Defense)
- 209057, 396414, 1074383 Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
- 209057, 396414, 1074383 Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
- Intramural Research Program U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | NCI | Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics)
- W81XSH-16-2-0010 United States Department of Defense | United States Army | Army Medical Command | Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Nagle
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Torukiri I Ibiebele
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Daniel Cramer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gillian E Hanley
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alice W Lee
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Bo Qin
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jean Richardson
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Naoko Sasamoto
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Linda Titus
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Britton Trabert
- Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Malcolm Pike
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gersekowski K, Na R, Alsop K, Delahunty R, Goode EL, Cunningham JM, Winham SJ, Pharoah PD, Song H, Webb PM. Risk Factors for Ovarian Cancer by BRCA Status: A Collaborative Case-Only Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:586-592. [PMID: 38300121 PMCID: PMC11268497 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with an inherited pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have a greatly increased risk of developing ovarian cancer, but the importance of behavioral factors is less clear. We used a case-only design to compare the magnitude of associations with established reproductive, hormonal, and lifestyle risk factors between BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers. METHODS We pooled data from five studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium including 637 BRCA carriers and 4,289 noncarriers. Covariate-adjusted generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate interaction risk ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with BRCA (carrier vs. noncarrier) as the response variable. RESULTS IRRs were above 1.0 for known protective factors including ever being pregnant (IRR = 1.29, 95% CI; 1.00-1.67) and ever using the oral contraceptive pill (1.30, 95% CI; 1.07-1.60), suggesting the protective effects of these factors may be reduced in carriers compared with noncarriers. Conversely, the IRRs for risk factors including endometriosis and menopausal hormone therapy were below 1.0, suggesting weaker positive associations among BRCA carriers. In contrast, associations with lifestyle factors including smoking, physical inactivity, body mass index, and aspirin use did not appear to differ by BRCA status. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that associations with hormonal and reproductive factors are generally weaker for those with a pathogenic BRCA variant than those without, while associations with modifiable lifestyle factors are similar for carriers and noncarriers. IMPACT Advice to maintain a healthy weight, be physically active, and refrain from smoking will therefore benefit BRCA carriers as well as noncarriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Gersekowski
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Renhua Na
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel Delahunty
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Julie M. Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Stacey J. Winham
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Honglin Song
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Penelope M. Webb
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
DiSipio T, Pearse E, Jordan S. Survivorship research in advanced gynecological cancer: A scoping review of cohort studies. Cancer Med 2023; 12:21779-21797. [PMID: 38009995 PMCID: PMC10757120 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent calls to action highlight the need to address gaps in our understanding of survivorship for those living with advanced gynecological cancer to support optimal care. To ensure future research fills these knowledge gaps, we need to understand the breadth of existing survivorship research in this patient group, including the outcomes assessed, the populations included and the duration and retention in follow-up. METHODS We conducted a systematic scoping review searching PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL during the month of November 2022 to identify prospective cohort studies measuring survivorship outcomes among participants with advanced (stage III-IV) gynecological cancer, or in cohorts in which ≥50% of participants had advanced cancer, or which provide results separately for patients with advanced cancer. Articles were screened, and data extracted using a standard form. RESULTS We assessed 33 articles from 21 unique studies, which overall included 6023 participants with gynecological cancer. Of these, 45% had cervical cancer, 44% ovarian, 10% endometrial/uterine, and 1% vaginal/vulvar cancer. The most frequently measured survivorship outcome was quality of life. Of the 33 articles, most reported on participant age (n = 31), but relatively few reported on comorbidities (n = 10), physical status (n = 6), ethnic background (n = 4), the country of birth (n = 2), or the area of participant residence (n = 2). None included details on indigenous status. Recruitment proportions ranged from 48% to 100%. Retention proportions ranged from 15% to 97%. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight gaps in survivorship research for advanced gynecological cancers and emphasize the need for future studies to include and describe the experiences of diverse and underrepresented groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey DiSipio
- School of Public HealthThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Emma Pearse
- School of Public HealthThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Susan Jordan
- School of Public HealthThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnston EA, Ibiebele TI, Friedlander ML, Grant PT, van der Pols JC, Webb PM. Association of protein intake with recurrence and survival following primary treatment of ovarian cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 2023:S0002-9165(23)48895-8. [PMID: 37146759 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnutrition is common during treatment for ovarian cancer and one in three report multiple symptoms affecting food intake after primary treatment. Little is known about diet post-treatment in relation to ovarian cancer survival, however, general recommendations for cancer survivors are to maintain a higher level of protein intake to support recovery and minimize nutritional deficits. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether intake of protein and protein food sources following primary treatment for ovarian cancer is associated with recurrence and survival. DESIGN Intake levels of protein and protein food groups were calculated from dietary data collected about 12 months post-diagnosis using a validated food frequency questionnaire in an Australian cohort of females with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Disease recurrence and survival status were abstracted from medical records (median 4.9 years follow-up). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for protein intake and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS Among 591 females who were progression-free at 12-months follow-up, 329 (56%) subsequently experienced cancer recurrence and 231 (39%) died. A higher level of protein intake was associated with better progression-free survival (>1-1.5 vs. ≤1 grams per kilogram body weight (g/kg): HRadjusted=0.69, 95% CI 0.48, 1.00; >1.5 vs. ≤1g/kg: HRadjusted=0.61, 95% CI 0.41, 0.90; >20% vs. ≤20% total energy intake from protein: HRadjusted=0.77, 95% CI 0.61, 0.96). There was no evidence for better progression-free survival with any particular protein food sources. There was a suggestion of better overall survival among those with higher total intakes of animal-based protein foods, particularly dairy products (HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.51, 0.99 for highest vs. lowest tertiles of total dairy intake). CONCLUSIONS After primary treatment for ovarian cancer, a higher level of protein intake may benefit progression-free survival. Ovarian cancer survivors should avoid dietary practices that limit intake of protein-rich foods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Johnston
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Program, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Torukiri I Ibiebele
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Program, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael L Friedlander
- University of New South Wales Clinical School, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter T Grant
- University of Melbourne, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jolieke C van der Pols
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Program, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Penelope M Webb
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Program, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thomson CA, Crane TE, Miller A, Gold MA, Powell M, Bixel K, Van Le L, DiSilvestro P, Ratner E, Lele S, Guntupalli S, Huh W, Robertson SE, Modesitt S, Casey AC, Basen-Engquist K, Skiba M, Walker J, Kachnic L, Alberts DS. Lifestyle intervention in ovarian cancer enhanced survival (LIVES) study (NRG/GOG0225): Recruitment, retention and baseline characteristics of a randomized trial of diet and physical activity in ovarian cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:11-18. [PMID: 36608382 PMCID: PMC10023359 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Lifestyle Intervention for oVarian cancer Enhanced Survival (LIVES) is a national study of a combined diet and physical activity intervention for stage II-IV ovarian cancer survival, an under-represented cancer in lifestyle behavioral intervention research. Here, we present the data on recruitment, retention, and baseline demographic, clinical and lifestyle behavior characteristics of the LIVES study participants. METHODS The LIVES study (NRG Oncology/GOG 0225) is a Phase III diet plus physical activity intervention trial testing the hypothesis that ovarian cancer survivors in the lifestyle intervention will demonstrate better progression-free survival than those in the control condition. Study interventions were delivered via centralized telephone-based health coaching. Baseline descriptive statistics were computed for demographic, clinical, and lifestyle behavior characteristics. RESULTS The LIVES study exceeded its recruitment goals, enrolling 1205 ovarian cancer survivors from 195 NRG/NCORP-affiliated oncology practices across 49 states from 2012 to 2018. The mean age of enrollees was 59.6 years; the majority (69.4%) with stage III disease; 89% White, 5.5% Hispanic; 64% overweight/obese. Baseline self-reported diet showed a mean daily intake of 6.6 servings of fruit and vegetables, 62.7 fat grams, and 21.7 g of fiber. Physical activity averaged 13.0 MET-hours/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity; 50.9 h/week of sedentary time. Retention rates exceeded 88%. CONCLUSION The LIVES study demonstrates efficiency in recruiting and retaining ovarian cancer survivors in a 24-month study of diet and physical activity intervention with a primary endpoint of progression free survival that will be reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.govNCT00719303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia A Thomson
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Tracy E Crane
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Austin Miller
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trials Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| | - Michael A Gold
- Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa, OK, USA.
| | - Matthew Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Kristin Bixel
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Linda Van Le
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, UNC Hospitals, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | | | - Elena Ratner
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | | | - Saketh Guntupalli
- University of Colorado Cancer Center - Anschutz Cancer Pavilion, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Warner Huh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | | | - Susan Modesitt
- University of Virginia, Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | | | - Karen Basen-Engquist
- Professor of Behavioral Science, Director of the Center for Energy Balance in Cancer Prevention & Survivorship, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Meghan Skiba
- Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Joan Walker
- University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Lisa Kachnic
- Columbia University, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - David S Alberts
- Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, Emeritus, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang C, Qin L, Chen S, Huang Q. CircSETDB1 contributes to paclitaxel resistance of ovarian cancer cells by sponging miR-508-3p and regulating ABCC1 expression. Anticancer Drugs 2023; 34:395-404. [PMID: 36729852 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a gynecological tumor with a poor prognosis. The chemotherapy failure and recurrence induced by paclitaxel (Ptx) resistance are the main reason for the failure of ovarian cancer treatment. In this study, we aimed to explore the role of circular RNA (circRNA) in the regulation of Ptx resistance in ovarian cancer. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was performed to detect the expression of circRNA SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1 (circSETDB1), microRNA (miR)-508-3p and ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 1 ( ABCC1 ) mRNA. The effects of circSETDB1 on Ptx resistance were explored by cell counting kit-8, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine, and flow cytometry experiments in vitro . The protein level was assessed by western blot. Dual-luciferase reporter and RNA pull-down assays were carried out to confirm the interactions among circSETDB1, miR-508-3p, and ABCC1 . Xenograft tumor experiment was performed to investigate the effect of circSETDB1 on Ptx resistance in vivo . CircSETDB1 was highly expressed in Ptx-resistant ovarian cancer. CircSETDB1 knockdown inhibited cell proliferation viability, half maximal inhibitory concentration value of Ptx, cell cycle progression, and induced cell apoptosis in Ptx-resistant ovarian cancer cells. miR-508-3p was a target of circSETDB1, and inhibition of miR-508-3p overturned the effects of circSETDB1 knockdown on the Ptx resistance of ovarian cancer cells. miR-508-5p could bind to ABCC1 . Overexpression of ABCC1 reversed the effects of circSETDB1 knockdown on the Ptx resistance of ovarian cancer cells. CircSETDB1 knockdown also enhanced Ptx sensitivity in vivo . In conclusion, circSETDB1 regulated Ptx resistance of ovarian cancer by targeting miR-508-3p/ ABCC1 axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyan Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Puren Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
The clinical impact of continued smoking in patients with breast and other hormone-dependent cancer: A systematic literature review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 184:103951. [PMID: 36805551 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review of studies that investigated whether quitting smoking at or around diagnosis improves survival of patients with hormone-dependent cancers (HDC). Nine studies published in 2013-2022 were included. Studies were very diverse in terms of design, definition of quitters and continued smokers, and prevalence of prognostic factors other than smoking cessation (e.g. patients' demographics, tumour characteristic, and treatments). For breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer, all included studies found that quitters had better overall, disease specific, and disease-free survival than continued smokers. For prostate cancer, there was no evidence of an association of smoking cessation with improved survival. This literature review provided suggestive evidence that female smokers diagnosed with cancer of the breast, ovary, or endometrium may improve their chances of surviving by stopping smoking. Smoking cessation counselling should become part of standard oncological care for these patients and integrated into breast cancer screening programs.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lowy DR, Fiore MC, Willis G, Mangold KN, Bloch MH, Baker TB. Treating Smoking in Cancer Patients: An Essential Component of Cancer Care-The New National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control Monograph. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1971-e1976. [PMID: 36343305 PMCID: PMC10166433 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Continued smoking after the diagnosis of cancer can markedly worsen oncology treatment side effects, cancer outcomes, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality. Conversely, mounting evidence demonstrates that smoking cessation by patients with cancer improves outcomes. A cancer diagnosis often serves as a teachable moment, characterized by high motivation to quit. However, too few patients with cancer who smoke are offered evidence-based smoking cessation treatment, and too few engage in such treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS The National Cancer Institute commissioned Tobacco Control Monograph 23, Treating Smoking in Cancer Patients: An Essential Component of Cancer Care, to review and synthesize the evidence that clarifies the need to intervene with smoking in cancer care. RESULTS Although many patients with newly diagnosed cancer who smoke make quit attempts, many of these are unsuccessful, and among those who successfully quit, relapse is common. Indeed, an estimated 12.2% of adults ever diagnosed with cancer reported they currently smoked (National Health Interview Survey, 2020). Patients with cancer who smoke are likely to benefit from smoking cessation treatments, including counseling and US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications, and there are many effective strategies to increase delivery of smoking cessation treatment in cancer care settings. CONCLUSION Smoking cessation is among the most effective treatment options for improving the likelihood of survival, quality of life, and overall health of patients with cancer who smoke. It is important for cancer care clinicians and patients to realize that it is never too late to quit smoking and that there are clear benefits to doing so, regardless of cancer type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas R. Lowy
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael C. Fiore
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Gordon Willis
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Michele H. Bloch
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Timothy B. Baker
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McKenzie ND, Ahmad S. Impact of Lifestyle Interventions on Gynecologic Cancers: Beyond Diet and Exercise. Am J Lifestyle Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/15598276221123764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A Lifestyle Medicine approach to compliment cancer care is less commonly researched or implemented for women with gynecologic cancers as compared to better funded malignancies such as breast, prostate, and colorectal. Yet, several gynecologic malignancies are linked to obesity, estrogen/metabolic signaling pathways, and altered tumor microenvironment which could benefit greatly from a lifestyle medicine program. Lifestyle medicine, an evidenced-based branch of science, has expanded to the prevention and treatment of disorders caused by lifestyle factors (including cancer). Modifiable lifestyle factors such as obesity, lack of physical activity/nutrient density, microbial dysbiosis, sleep disturbance, and chronic stressors contribute greatly to cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. This overarching area of research is evolving with some subtopics in their infancy requiring further investigation. Modern tools have allowed for better understanding of mechanisms by which adiposity and inactivity affect tumor promoting signaling pathways as well as the local tumor environment. Through the evolving use of these sophisticated techniques, novel prognostic biomarkers have emerged to explore efficacy of pharmacologic and lifestyle interventions in cancer. This state-of-the-art review article appraises recent evidence for a lifestyle medicine approach, beyond diet and exercise, to optimize survivorship and quality of life for patients with gynecologic cancers and introduces the 8-week web-based comprehensive HEAL-GYN program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarfraz Ahmad
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dhanis J, Keidan N, Blake D, Rundle S, Strijker D, van Ham M, Pijnenborg JMA, Smits A. Prehabilitation to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Gynaecological Cancer: A New Window of Opportunity? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143448. [PMID: 35884512 PMCID: PMC9351657 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Surgery is an important mainstay in the treatment of gynaecological cancers but is associated with operative complications, especially for those with poor physical and mental health. Prehabilitation is a new and upcoming strategy to optimise patients’ functional capacity, nutritional status and psychosocial wellbeing in order to reduce complications and enhance recovery. In this review, we assessed the evidence on prehabilitation programmes for patients with gynaecological cancer. The limited evidence shows that prehabilitation may reduce length of hospital stay for ovarian cancer patients, and may result in significant weight loss in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. Comparative prospective studies are required to determine the effectiveness of prehabilitation on reducing operative complications and improving quality of life, and to further specify the content of such a programme for patients with gynaecological cancer. Abstract The literature evaluating the effect of prehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes and quality of life of patients with gynaecological cancer undergoing surgery was reviewed. Databases including Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE (Ovid) and PsycINFO were systematically searched to identify studies evaluating the effect of prehabilitation programmes on patients with gynaecological cancer. Both unimodal and multimodal prehabilitation programmes were included encompassing physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support. Primary outcomes were surgical complications and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were anthropometric changes and adherence to the prehabilitation programme. Seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising 580 patients. Included studies were nonrandomised prospective studies (n = 4), retrospective studies (n = 2) and one case report. Unimodal programmes and multimodal programmes were included. In patients with ovarian cancer, multimodal prehabilitation resulted in significantly reduced hospital stay and time to chemotherapy. In patients with endometrial and cervical cancer, prehabilitation was associated with significant weight loss, but had no significant effects on surgical complications or mortality. No adverse events of the programmes were reported. Evidence on the effect of prehabilitation for patients with gynaecological cancer is limited. Future studies are needed to determine the effects on postoperative complications and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joëlle Dhanis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Radboud University, 6526 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-644404756
| | - Nathaniel Keidan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| | - Dominic Blake
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| | - Stuart Rundle
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| | - Dieuwke Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Maaike van Ham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
| | - Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
| | - Anke Smits
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (M.v.H.); (J.M.A.P.); (A.S.)
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK; (N.K.); (D.B.); (S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang T, Read SH, Moino D, Ayoubi Y, Chern JY, Tworoger SS. Tobacco Smoking and Survival Following a Diagnosis with Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1376-1382. [PMID: 35775222 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the influence of smoking on ovarian cancer survival. We investigated this relationship in a hospital-based study. METHODS Analyses included 519 women with ovarian cancer. We used multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Risk of all-cause mortality was increased for current smokers (HR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.09-2.63) versus never smokers, especially for those with ≥15 cigarettes per day (HR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.15-3.20). Results were largely similar after additional adjustment for debulking status (current vs. never smokers, HR = 2.96; 95% CI: 1.07-8.21) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (comparable HR = 2.87; 95% CI: 1.02-8.06). Compared with never smokers, smoking duration ≥20 years (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.94-2.03) and ≥20 pack-years (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 0.92-1.99) were suggestively associated with worse outcomes. Current smoking was also positively associated with the risk of mortality among patients with ovarian cancer recurrence (current vs. never/past smokers, HR = 2.79; 95% CI: 1.44-5.41), despite the null association between smoking and recurrence (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.86-2.48). Furthermore, no association was observed for smoking initiation before age 18 (HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.80-1.85), or either environmental smoke exposure at home (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.76-1.78) or at work (HR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.75-1.60). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest active tobacco smoking is associated with worse ovarian cancer outcomes, particularly after a recurrence. IMPACT Our findings support structured smoking cessation programs for patients with ovarian cancer, especially in recurrent settings. Further research to confirm these findings and examine the interplay between smoking and the tumor immune microenvironment may help provide insight into ovarian cancer etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyi Wang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Susan H Read
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Daniela Moino
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Yasmin Ayoubi
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jing-Yi Chern
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gong TT, Liu FH, Liu YS, Yan S, Xu HL, He XH, Wei YF, Qin X, Gao S, Zhao YH, Wu QJ. A Follow-Up Study of Ovarian Cancer (OOPS): A Study Protocol. Front Nutr 2022; 9:872773. [PMID: 35782924 PMCID: PMC9248802 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.872773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The ovarian cancer (OC) follow-up study (OOPS) is an on-going hospital-based large prospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to explore the relationship between pre/post-diagnostic biological, clinical, environmental, and lifestyle factors with focus on the diet and OC prognosis (including drug resistance, relapse, and mortality). Patients recruited during the baseline survey were between 18 and 79 years old, with histologically confirmed OC diagnosis. Their follow-up and medical treatment were conducted at the gynecological oncology ward at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China after 2015. A total of 703 OC patients made up the final OOPS study population. The follow-up stage was conducted in both passive and active modes. In the passive mode, the follow-up was performed by linkage to the Liaoning Providence Center for Disease Control and Prevention every 6 months to obtain health outcome results. The status of lifestyle factors was re-estimated using the same measurements as those in the baseline survey. OC participants in the OOPS study completed a questionnaire and anthropometric examinations. In addition, biological specimens were collected during the baseline survey, which included blood, urine, and stool samples that were stored for further use. This article is intended to serve as an introduction to this project and to provide details for investigators who may be carry out related analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Ting Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Fang-Hua Liu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ya-Shu Liu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shi Yan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - He-Li Xu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xin-Hui He
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yi-Fan Wei
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xue Qin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Song Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yu-Hong Zhao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qi-Jun Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Qi-Jun Wu
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liberto JM, Chen SY, Shih IM, Wang TH, Wang TL, Pisanic TR. Current and Emerging Methods for Ovarian Cancer Screening and Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2885. [PMID: 35740550 PMCID: PMC9221480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
With a 5-year survival rate of less than 50%, ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is one of the most highly aggressive gynecological malignancies affecting women today. The high mortality rate of HGSC is largely attributable to delays in diagnosis, as most patients remain undiagnosed until the late stages of -disease. There are currently no recommended screening tests for ovarian cancer and there thus remains an urgent need for new diagnostic methods, particularly those that can detect the disease at early stages when clinical intervention remains effective. While diagnostics for ovarian cancer share many of the same technical hurdles as for other cancer types, the low prevalence of the disease in the general population, coupled with a notable lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers, have made the development of a clinically useful screening strategy particularly challenging. Here, we present a detailed review of the overall landscape of ovarian cancer diagnostics, with emphasis on emerging methods that employ novel protein, genetic, epigenetic and imaging-based biomarkers and/or advanced diagnostic technologies for the noninvasive detection of HGSC, particularly in women at high risk due to germline mutations such as BRCA1/2. Lastly, we discuss the translational potential of these approaches for achieving a clinically implementable solution for screening and diagnostics of early-stage ovarian cancer as a means of ultimately improving patient outcomes in both the general and high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane M. Liberto
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; (J.M.L.); (I.-M.S.); (T.-L.W.)
| | - Sheng-Yin Chen
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 33302 Taoyuan, Taiwan;
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; (J.M.L.); (I.-M.S.); (T.-L.W.)
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA;
| | - Tza-Huei Wang
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA;
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Tian-Li Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; (J.M.L.); (I.-M.S.); (T.-L.W.)
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA;
| | - Thomas R. Pisanic
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brieger KK, Phung MT, Mukherjee B, Bakulski KM, Anton-Culver H, Bandera EV, Bowtell DDL, Cramer DW, deFazio A, Doherty JA, Fereday S, Fortner RT, Gentry-Maharaj A, Goode EL, Goodman MT, Harris HR, Matsuo K, Menon U, Modugno F, Moysich KB, Qin B, Ramus SJ, Risch HA, Rossing MA, Schildkraut JM, Trabert B, Vierkant RA, Winham SJ, Wentzensen N, Wu AH, Ziogas A, Khoja L, Cho KR, McLean K, Richardson J, Grout B, Chase A, Deurloo CM, Odunsi K, Nelson BH, Brenton JD, Terry KL, Pharoah PDP, Berchuck A, Hanley GE, Webb PM, Pike MC, Pearce CL. High Prediagnosis Inflammation-Related Risk Score Associated with Decreased Ovarian Cancer Survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:443-452. [PMID: 34789471 PMCID: PMC9281656 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is suggestive evidence that inflammation is related to ovarian cancer survival. However, more research is needed to identify inflammation-related factors that are associated with ovarian cancer survival and to determine their combined effects. METHODS This analysis used pooled data on 8,147 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The prediagnosis inflammation-related exposures of interest included alcohol use; aspirin use; other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use; body mass index; environmental tobacco smoke exposure; history of pelvic inflammatory disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and endometriosis; menopausal hormone therapy use; physical inactivity; smoking status; and talc use. Using Cox proportional hazards models, the relationship between each exposure and survival was assessed in 50% of the data. A weighted inflammation-related risk score (IRRS) was developed, and its association with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models in the remaining 50% of the data. RESULTS There was a statistically significant trend of increasing risk of death per quartile of the IRRS [HR = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.14]. Women in the upper quartile of the IRRS had a 31% higher death rate compared with the lowest quartile (95% CI, 1.11-1.54). CONCLUSIONS A higher prediagnosis IRRS was associated with an increased mortality risk after an ovarian cancer diagnosis. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate whether postdiagnosis exposures are also associated with survival. IMPACT Given that pre- and postdiagnosis exposures are often correlated and many are modifiable, our study results can ultimately motivate the development of behavioral recommendations to enhance survival among patients with ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine K. Brieger
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Minh Tung Phung
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bhramar Mukherjee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kelly M. Bakulski
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Elisa V. Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - David D. L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel W. Cramer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna deFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, and The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences. University of Utah. Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Ellen L. Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Women’s Cancer Research Center. Magee-Women’s Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburg, PA, USA
| | - Kirsten B. Moysich
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bo Qin
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Harvey A. Risch
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stacey J. Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anna H. Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Lilah Khoja
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kathleen R. Cho
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Karen McLean
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jean Richardson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - James D. Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kathryn L. Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul D. P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gillian E. Hanley
- University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Penelope M. Webb
- Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Castro-Espin C, Agudo A. The Role of Diet in Prognosis among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Dietary Patterns and Diet Interventions. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14020348. [PMID: 35057525 PMCID: PMC8779048 DOI: 10.3390/nu14020348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer survival continues to improve in high-income countries, partly explained by advances in screening and treatment. Previous studies have mainly examined the relationship between individual dietary components and cancer prognosis in tumours with good therapeutic response (breast, colon and prostate cancers). The aim of this review is to assess qualitatively (and quantitatively where appropriate) the associations of dietary patterns and cancer prognosis from published prospective cohort studies, as well as the effect of diet interventions by means of randomised controlled trials (RCT). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, and a total of 35 prospective cohort studies and 14 RCT published between 2011 and 2021 were selected. Better overall diet quality was associated with improved survival among breast and colorectal cancer survivors; adherence to the Mediterranean diet was associated to lower risk of mortality in colorectal and prostate cancer survivors. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model showed that higher versus lower diet quality was associated with a 23% reduction in overall mortality in breast cancer survivors. There was evidence that dietary interventions, generally combined with physical activity, improved overall quality of life, though most studies were in breast cancer survivors. Further cohort and intervention studies in other cancers are needed to make more specific recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlota Castro-Espin
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology—ICO, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain;
- Nutrition and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute—IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Agudo
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology—ICO, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain;
- Nutrition and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute—IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-93-2607401
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Campbell R, King MT, Ross TL, Cohen PA, Friedlander ML, Webb PM. Development and validation of the measure of ovarian symptoms and treatment concerns for surveillance (MOST-S26): An instrument to complement the clinical follow-up of women with ovarian cancer after completion of first-line treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:398-407. [PMID: 34481610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment (MOST-T35) is a patient-reported symptom index, developed and validated in the context of palliative chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). We aimed to develop and validate a version suitable for surveillance of symptoms following first-line treatment for OC to support clinical follow-up. METHODS In a prospective study of women following completion of first-line chemotherapy for OC, patients completed MOST-T35 every 3 months for up to 3.5 years and other patient-reported outcome measures. Construct validity (Spearman's correlations), discriminative validity (t-tests/ANOVAs assessing differences between clinically distinct groups), ability to detect clinically important symptoms (receiver operating characteristic analysis), and responsiveness (t-tests examining change) were assessed. RESULTS Data from 726 women who received ≥3 cycles of chemotherapy, did not progress within 3 months, and completed ≥one MOST-T35 were analysed. The revised version, MOST-S26, has 26 items and 5 multi-item indexes: peripheral neuropathy (MOST-NTx), disease or treatment-related (MOST-DorT), abdominal (MOST-Abdo), and psychological symptoms (MOST-Psych), and MOST-Wellbeing, plus 9 individual items. Construct validity was confirmed (r range = 0.43-0.88). Discriminative validity confirmed expected differences between groups. MOST-NTx and MOST-Psych detected improvements in peripheral neuropathy and psychological symptoms respectively, whereas MOST-Abdo detected worsening of abdominal symptoms pre-recurrence. CONCLUSIONS This study developed and validated the MOST-S26, for surveillance of women in follow-up after first-line chemotherapy for OC. MOST-S26 reliably detected improvement in symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, psychological distress and may detect symptoms of relapse. Administration of MOST-S26 in follow-up consultations could identify concerning symptoms and facilitate timely and appropriate intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Campbell
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Madeleine T King
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tanya L Ross
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paul A Cohen
- St John of God Subiaco Hospital and University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Michael L Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School UNSW and Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Falzone L, Scandurra G, Lombardo V, Gattuso G, Lavoro A, Distefano AB, Scibilia G, Scollo P. A multidisciplinary approach remains the best strategy to improve and strengthen the management of ovarian cancer (Review). Int J Oncol 2021; 59:53. [PMID: 34132354 PMCID: PMC8208622 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer represents one of the most aggressive female tumors worldwide. Over the decades, the therapeutic options for the treatment of ovarian cancer have been improved significantly through the advancement of surgical techniques as well as the availability of novel effective drugs able to extend the life expectancy of patients. However, due to its clinical, biological and molecular complexity, ovarian cancer is still considered one of the most difficult tumors to manage. In this context, several studies have highlighted how a multidisciplinary approach to this pathology improves the prognosis and survival of patients with ovarian cancer. On these bases, the aim of the present review is to present recent advantages in the diagnosis, staging and treatment of ovarian cancer highlighting the benefits of a patient‑centered care approach and on the importance of a multidisciplinary team for the management of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Falzone
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, National Cancer Institute‑IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, I‑80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Gattuso
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Alessandro Lavoro
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Scibilia
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, I‑95126 Catania, Italy
| | - Paolo Scollo
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, I‑95126 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang YH, Li Z, Tan MZ. Association Between Diet Quality and Risk of Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:659183. [PMID: 34084748 PMCID: PMC8168438 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.659183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The relationship between diet quality indices and risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers were unclear. We aimed at conducting a systematic review to evaluate the epidemiological evidence. Methods Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for eligible studies up to December 2020. Epidemiological studies reported the association of the diet quality with risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers were evaluated. Results Eleven eligible studies were identified, of which six studies were case-control studies, four were cohort studies, and one was case-cohort study. All studies were considered as high-quality with low risk of bias. Seven studies evaluated the association of diet quality with risk of ovarian cancer. Four studies reported null association for diet quality indices such as Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2005, HEI-2010, Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) and Recommended Foods Score (RFS). Two studies reported significantly inverse association for Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)-2010 and Healthy Diet Score (HDS) indices. One study reported significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer associated with higher level of Dietary Guidelines for Americans Index. Dose-response analysis showed pooled relative risks of 0.98 (95%Cl: 0.95, 1.01) and 0.94 (95%Cl: 0.77, 1.13) for each 10 points increase in the HEI-2005 and AHEI-2010 indices. Seven studies evaluated the association of diet quality with risk of endometrial cancer. Three studies reported significantly inverse association of diet quality as assessed by the MDS and Diet Score Quintiles with risk of endometrial cancer. Four studies reported null association for other diet quality indices including HEI-2005, HEI-2010, RFS and HDS. Dose-response analysis showed a pooled relative risk of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.81, 0.93) for one unit increment of the MDS. Conclusion This study suggests little evidence on the association between diet quality and risk of ovarian cancer. Adherence to high quality diet, as assessed by MDS, might be associated with lower the risk of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hua Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhuo Li
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Ming-Zi Tan
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|