1
|
Wang F, Shen L, Guo W, Liu T, Li J, Qin S, Bai Y, Chen Z, Wang J, Pan Y, Shu Y, Zhao F, Cheng Y, Ye F, Gu K, Zhang T, Pan H, Zhong H, Zhou F, Qin Y, Yang L, Mao W, Li Q, Dai W, Li W, Wang S, Tang Y, Ma D, Yin X, Deng Y, Yuan Y, Li M, Hu W, Chen D, Li G, Liu Q, Tan P, Fan S, Shi M, Su W, Xu RH. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:2189-2198. [PMID: 38824242 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02989-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In the multicenter, double-blind phase 3 FRUTIGA trial, 703 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who progressed on fluorouracil- and platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive fruquintinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2/3; 4 mg orally, once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1/8/15 per cycle). The study results were positive as one of the dual primary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), was met (median PFS, 5.6 months in the fruquintinib arm versus 2.7 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.68; P < 0.0001). The other dual primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not met (median OS, 9.6 months versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.13; P = 0.6064). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment significantly improved PFS, but not OS, in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and could potentially be another treatment option for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03223376 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Wang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
| | - Weijian Guo
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Li
- Tongji University Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Nanjing Tianyinshan Cancer Hospital of China Pharmaceutical University (CPU), Nanjing, China
| | - Yuxian Bai
- Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Zhendong Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | | | | | - Yongqian Shu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), Nanjing, China
| | - Fuyou Zhao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China
| | | | - Feng Ye
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Kangsheng Gu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Fuxiang Zhou
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanru Qin
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, China
| | | | - Qiu Li
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenxiang Dai
- The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Wei Li
- The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Shubin Wang
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yong Tang
- Xinjiang Medical University Cancer Hospital, Urumqi Municipality, China
| | - Dong Ma
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Yanhong Deng
- The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Man Li
- The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Wenwei Hu
- The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China
| | - Donghui Chen
- Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoxin Li
- Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiqi Liu
- HUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu E, Xie Q, Huang X, Zhang Z. Application of spatial omics in gastric cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 262:155503. [PMID: 39128411 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC), a globally prevalent and lethal malignancy, continues to be a key research focus. However, due to its considerable heterogeneity and complex pathogenesis, the treatment and diagnosis of gastric cancer still face significant challenges. With the rapid development of spatial omics technology, which provides insights into the spatial information within tumor tissues, it has emerged as a significant tool in gastric cancer research. This technology affords new insights into the pathology and molecular biology of gastric cancer for scientists. This review discusses recent advances in spatial omics technology for gastric cancer research, highlighting its applications in the tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor heterogeneity, tumor genesis and development mechanisms, and the identification of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Moreover, this article highlights spatial omics' potential in precision medicine and summarizes existing challenges and future directions. It anticipates spatial omics' continuing impact on gastric cancer research, aiming to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for patients. With this review, we aim to offer a comprehensive overview to scientists and clinicians in gastric cancer research, motivating further exploration and utilization of spatial omics technology. Our goal is to improve patient outcomes, including survival rates and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erran Zhu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Grade 20, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China
| | - Qi Xie
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Grade 20, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China
| | - Xinqi Huang
- Excellent Class, Clinical Medicine, Grade 20, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China
| | - Zhiwei Zhang
- Cancer Research Institute of Hengyang Medical College, University of South China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Cellular and Molecular Pathology of Hunan; Department of Pathology, Department of Pathology of Hengyang Medical College, University of South China; The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Masetti M, Al-Batran SE, Goetze TO, Thuss-Patience P, Knorrenschild JR, Goekkurt E, Folprecht G, Ettrich TJ, Lindig U, Luley KB, Pink D, Dechow T, Sookthai D, Junge S, Loose M, Pauligk C, Lorenzen S. Efficacy of ramucirumab combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:2142-2150. [PMID: 38447003 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
FOLFOX plus nivolumab represents a standard of care for first-line therapy of advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) with positive PD-L1 expression. The efficacy of second-line VEGFR-2 inhibition with ramucirumab (RAM) plus chemotherapy after progression to immunochemotherapy remains unclear. Medical records of patients with aGEC enrolled in the randomized phase II AIO-STO-0417 trial after treatment failure to first-line FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on second-line therapy: RAM plus chemotherapy (RAM group) or treatment without RAM (control group). Eighty three patients were included. In the overall population, progression-free survival (PFS) in the RAM group was superior to the control (4.5 vs 2.9 months). Responders (CR/PR) to first-line immunochemotherapy receiving RAM containing second-line therapy had prolonged OS from start of first-line therapy (28.9 vs 16.5 months), as well as second-line OS (9.6 vs 7.5 months), PFS (5.6 vs 2.9 months) and DCR (53% vs 29%) compared to the control. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was 42% and 44% for the RAM and the control, respectively. Patients with CPS ≥1 in the RAM group showed better tumor control (ORR 25% vs 10%) and improved survival (total OS 11.5 vs 8.0 months; second-line OS 6.5 vs 3.9 months; PFS 4.5 vs 1.6 months) compared to the control. Prior exposure to first-line FOLFOX plus dual checkpoint inhibition followed by RAM plus chemotherapy shows favorable response and survival rates especially in patients with initial response and positive PD-L1 expression and has the potential to advance the treatment paradigm in aGEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Masetti
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Munich, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany and Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thorsten O Goetze
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany and Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Haematologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gunnar Folprecht
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Udo Lindig
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Kim Barbara Luley
- UKSH Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Daniel Pink
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin C, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Transplantationszentrum, Palliativmedizin, Universität Greifswald and Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin-Sarkomzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | - Disorn Sookthai
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sabine Junge
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Maria Loose
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claudia Pauligk
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang X, Zhou L, Zhou C, Shen L. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ramucirumab as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in Japan and South Korea: A Systematic Literature Review. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2112-2132. [PMID: 38619719 PMCID: PMC11133076 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer has the highest incidence and mortality in Eastern Asia. The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel (PTX) for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA) have been established in clinical trials. To assess the effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy as a second-line treatment in real-world clinical practice in Eastern Asia and to pave the way for future research, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted. METHODS Studies published between January 2014 and December 2021 were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM databases. RESULTS This SLR included 23 studies from Japan and South Korea, of which 22 were retrospective and 11 were full-text articles. Most studies investigated RAM + PTX (range of median overall survival [mOS] 7.4-12.2 months; median progression-free survival [mPFS] 3.35-7.0 months). Data were limited for RAM, RAM + albumin-bound paclitaxel, and RAM + taxane. RAM + PTX was associated with longer survival (mOS 9.3-12.2 months vs. 5.2-9.7 months; mPFS 4.1-5.1 months vs. 3.0-4.1 months) than PTX. Patients with prior anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) exposure experienced longer mPFS (4.8 vs. 3.4 months) from RAM + taxane than those without prior anti-PD-1 exposure. Few patients (3.3-6.3%) discontinued RAM or RAM-based therapy because of adverse events (AEs). Hematological toxicities were most frequently occurring AEs and no new safety signals were identified compared to clinical trials. CONCLUSION RAM + PTX as a second-line treatment is effective and associated with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEA in real-world settings of Japan and South Korea. More studies are recommended to further evaluate effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy, especially after anti-PD-1 therapy, in a wider Eastern Asian population. TRIAL REGISTRATION INPLASY registration number INPLASY2022120023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaotian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Li Zhou
- Eli Lilly and Company, Shanghai, China
| | - Chan Zhou
- Eli Lilly and Company, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shitara K, George B, Taieb J, Sundar R, Fakih MG, Makris L, Benhadji KA, Ghidini M. Effects of prior therapies on outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer in a randomized phase III trial (TAGS). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04813-z. [PMID: 37213030 PMCID: PMC10374776 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04813-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III TAGS trial, trifluridine/tipiracil showed survival benefit versus placebo in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies. This post hoc exploratory analysis assessed the impact of prior therapy type on outcomes. METHODS Based on prior treatment, patients in TAGS (N = 507) were categorized into overlapping subgroups: ramucirumab ± other agents (n = 169), no ramucirumab (n = 338), paclitaxel but no ramucirumab (n = 136), ramucirumab + paclitaxel sequentially or in combination (n = 154), neither paclitaxel nor ramucirumab (n = 202), irinotecan (n = 281), and no irinotecan (n = 226). Overall and progression-free survival, time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2, and safety were assessed. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and prior therapy patterns were generally well balanced between trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo arms across subgroups. Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with survival benefits versus placebo regardless of prior treatment: across subgroups, median overall survival was 4.6-6.1 versus 3.0-3.8 months (hazard ratios, 0.47-0.88), median progression-free survival was 1.9-2.3 versus 1.7-1.8 months (hazard ratios, 0.49-0.67), and median time to ECOG PS ≥ 2 was 4.0-4.7 versus 1.9-2.5 months (hazard ratios, 0.56-0.88). Among trifluridine/tipiracil-randomized patients, median overall and progression-free survival trended longer in those who had not received ramucirumab, paclitaxel and ramucirumab, or irinotecan (6.0-6.1 and 2.1-2.3 months, respectively) than in those who previously received these agents (4.6-5.7 and 1.9 months). The trifluridine/tipiracil safety profile was consistent across subgroups, with similar overall incidences of grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Minor variations in hematologic toxicities were noted. CONCLUSIONS In TAGS, third- or later-line trifluridine/tipiracil treatment demonstrated overall and progression-free survival and functioning benefits versus placebo and a consistent safety profile in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer, regardless of prior treatment type. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT02500043.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Shitara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa-Shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Ben George
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Julien Taieb
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris-Cité, SIRIC CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Raghav Sundar
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marwan G Fakih
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Glasson Y, Chépeaux LA, Dumé AS, Lafont V, Faget J, Bonnefoy N, Michaud HA. Single-cell high-dimensional imaging mass cytometry: one step beyond in oncology. Semin Immunopathol 2023; 45:17-28. [PMID: 36598557 PMCID: PMC9812013 DOI: 10.1007/s00281-022-00978-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Solid tumors have a dynamic ecosystem in which malignant and non-malignant (endothelial, stromal, and immune) cell types constantly interact. Importantly, the abundance, localization, and functional orientation of each cell component within the tumor microenvironment vary significantly over time and in response to treatment. Such intratumoral heterogeneity influences the tumor course and its sensitivity to treatments. Recently, high-dimensional imaging mass cytometry (IMC) has been developed to explore the tumor ecosystem at the single-cell level. In the last years, several studies demonstrated that IMC is a powerful tool to decipher the tumor complexity. In this review, we summarize the potential of this technology and how it may be useful for cancer research (from preclinical to clinical studies).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaël Glasson
- IRCM, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Plateforme de Cytométrie Et d’Imagerie de Masse, Inserm Montpellier, France
| | - Laure-Agnès Chépeaux
- IRCM, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Plateforme de Cytométrie Et d’Imagerie de Masse, Inserm Montpellier, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Dumé
- IRCM, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Plateforme de Cytométrie Et d’Imagerie de Masse, Inserm Montpellier, France
| | | | - Julien Faget
- IRCM, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Inserm Montpellier, France
| | - Nathalie Bonnefoy
- IRCM, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Plateforme de Cytométrie Et d’Imagerie de Masse, Inserm Montpellier, France
| | - Henri-Alexandre Michaud
- IRCM, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Plateforme de Cytométrie Et d'Imagerie de Masse, Inserm Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu Z, Xun J, Liu S, Wang B, Zhang A, Zhang L, Wang X, Zhang Q. Imaging mass cytometry: High-dimensional and single-cell perspectives on the microenvironment of solid tumours. PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022; 175:140-146. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
8
|
Valcarcel S, Gallego J, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Diez M, de Castro EM, Hernandez R, Arrazubi V, Custodio A, Cano JM, Montes AF, Macias I, Visa L, Calvo A, Tocino RV, Lago NM, Limón ML, Granja M, Gil M, Pimentel P, Macia-Rivas L, Pérez CH, Mangas M, Carnicero AM, Cerdà P, Gonzalez LG, Navalon FG, Rambla MDM, Richard MM, Carmona-Bayonas A. Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04294-6. [PMID: 36042046 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04294-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy in second-line (2L) advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) based on HER2 status and analyze prognostic factors. METHODS The study includes patients from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry with aGEC and known HER2 status who received 2L between 2016 and 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and multivariable Cox regression analysis was done to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS Of the 552 patients who met the selection criteria, 149 (26.9%) had HER2-positive aGEC, 89 were treated with chemotherapy, and 60 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel, and 403 had an HER2-negative aGEC, 259 were treated with chemotherapy, and 144 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel. In the whole sample, 2L PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8-3.2), 2L OS, 5.7 months (5.2-6.3), and ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.78, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.68, 0.55-0.83, p = 0.0002). Median PFS of ramucirumab- paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 3.5 vs 2.8 months (HR 0.67, 0.54-0.83, p = 0.0004) in HER2-negative, and 4.7 vs 2.7 months (HR 0.57, 0.40-0.82, p = 0.0031) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. Median OS for ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 6.6 vs 5 months (HR 0.67, 0.53-0.85, p = 0.0007) in HER2-negative, and 7.4 vs 5.6 months (HR 0.70, 0.53-1.04, p = 0.083) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. ECOG-PS, tumor burden, Lauren subtype, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS In patients with an aGEC from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, 2L treatment with ramucirumab-paclitaxel was superior to chemotherapy in PFS, OS and response rate, independent of HER2 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sena Valcarcel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Avenida Roma Sn., CP 33011, Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Javier Gallego
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Marc Diez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Martínez de Castro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Raquel Hernandez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Virginia Arrazubi
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana Custodio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC CB16/12/00398, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juana María Cano
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández Montes
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Orense, Spain
| | - Ismael Macias
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Laura Visa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario El Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aitana Calvo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosario Vidal Tocino
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca - IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Nieves Martínez Lago
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Coruña, Spain
| | - María Luisa Limón
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Mónica Granja
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mireia Gil
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Ciberonc CB16/12/0035, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paola Pimentel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
| | - Lola Macia-Rivas
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carolina Hernández Pérez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Montserrat Mangas
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao-Usansolo, Spain
| | | | - Paula Cerdà
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucía Gomez Gonzalez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | - Marta Martin Richard
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet, Spain
| | - Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, IMIB, CP13/00126, PI17/0050 (ISCIII& FEDER), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guo X, Yang B, He L, Sun Y, Song Y, Qu X. PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:905651. [PMID: 36003374 PMCID: PMC9393421 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.905651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, there has been no direct comparison between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus different chemotherapy regimens in first-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register were used to seek a series of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying on first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy and phase III RCTs comparing first-line oxaliplatin and cisplatin-based chemotherapy for AGC to perform NMA. The main outcome was overall survival (OS) and other outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results Eight eligible RCTs involving 5723 patients were included. Compared with PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy could prolong the OS without statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82, 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.63-1.06). However, for patients with combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly prolonged the OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.99). PFS in PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was significantly longer than that in PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53-0.99). Regarding safety, the incidence of ≥ 3 TRAEs was similar between PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.66-1.12). The surface under the cumulative ranking area curve (SUCRA) indicated that PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy ranked first for OS (97.7%), PFS (99.3%), and ORR (89.0%). For oxaliplatin-based regimens, there was no significant difference between nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and sintilimab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in terms of OS, PFS, ORR, and ≥3 TRAEs. Conclusion Compared with PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS. Considering both efficacy and safety, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy might be a better option in the first-line treatment for AGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Bowen Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lingzi He
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yiting Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yujia Song
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiujuan Qu
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Xiujuan Qu,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Okada M, Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Lin CY, Chin K, Kadowaki S, Ahn MJ, Hamamoto Y, Doki Y, Yen CC, Kubota Y, Kim SB, Hsu CH, Holtved E, Xynos I, Matsumura Y, Takazawa A, Kitagawa Y. Three-Year Follow-Up and Response-Survival Relationship of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ATTRACTION-3). Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3277-3286. [PMID: 35294546 PMCID: PMC9662935 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Limited long-term data are available on immune checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We report 3-year follow-up data from our study of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel) in patients with previously treated ESCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS ATTRACTION-3 was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial. Overall survival (OS), time from randomization to death from any cause, was the primary endpoint. An exploratory subanalysis assessed OS according to the best overall response (BOR) with and without landmark at 4 months. RESULTS Of the enrolled patients, 210 received nivolumab and 209 received chemotherapy. With a minimum follow-up of 36.0 months, OS was longer in the nivolumab versus the chemotherapy group (median, 10.9 vs. 8.5 months; HR, 0.79; P = 0.0264), with 3-year OS rates of 15.3% and 8.7%, respectively. The median OS was longer with nivolumab versus chemotherapy irrespective of the BOR (complete response/partial response: 19.9 vs. 15.4 months; stable disease: 17.4 vs. 8.8 months; and progressive disease: 7.6 vs. 4.2 months). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were reported in 40 patients (19.1%) in the nivolumab group and 133 patients (63.9%) in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab as second-line therapy demonstrated clinically meaningful long-term improvement in OS compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced ESCC. The OS was consistently improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group regardless of BOR. Nivolumab was well tolerated over the 3-year follow-up. See related commentary by Yoon et al., p. 3173.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.,Corresponding Author: Morihito Okada, Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan. Phone: 81 82 257 5869; Fax: 81 82 255 7109; E-mail:
| | - Ken Kato
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Byoung Chul Cho
- Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Masanobu Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Chen-Yuan Lin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, China Medical University Hospital and School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Keisho Chin
- Gastroenterological Chemotherapy Department, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenori Kadowaki
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yasuo Hamamoto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keio Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Surgery, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Chueh-Chuan Yen
- Division of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Research and Division of Medical Oncology, Center for Immuno-oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yutaro Kubota
- Department of Oncology, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chih-Hung Hsu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Eva Holtved
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ioannis Xynos
- Oncology Clinical Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Yasuhiro Matsumura
- Oncology Clinical Development, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Takazawa
- Data Science, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Multiplex Tissue Imaging: Spatial Revelations in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133170. [PMID: 35804939 PMCID: PMC9264815 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide, and the overall aging of the population results in an increased risk of a cancer diagnosis during a person’s lifetime. Diagnosis and treatment at an early stage will typically increase the chances of survival. Tumors can develop therapy resistance, and it is difficult to predict how individual patients will respond to therapy. Most studies that aim to resolve this problem have focused on studying the composition and characteristics of dissociated tumors, while ignoring the role of cell localization and interactions within the tumor microenvironment. In the past decade, technological innovations have enabled multiplex imaging analyses of intact tumors to study localization and interaction parameters, which can be used as biomarkers, or can be correlated with treatment responses and clinical outcomes. Abstract The tumor microenvironment is a complex ecosystem containing various cell types, such as immune cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells, which interact with the tumor cells. In recent decades, the cancer research field has gained insight into the cellular subtypes that are involved in tumor microenvironment heterogeneity. Moreover, it has become evident that cellular interactions in the tumor microenvironment can either promote or inhibit tumor development, progression, and drug resistance, depending on the context. Multiplex spatial analysis methods have recently been developed; these have offered insight into how cellular crosstalk dynamics and heterogeneity affect cancer prognoses and responses to treatment. Multiplex (imaging) technologies and computational analysis methods allow for the spatial visualization and quantification of cell–cell interactions and properties. These technological advances allow for the discovery of cellular interactions within the tumor microenvironment and provide detailed single-cell information on properties that define cellular behavior. Such analyses give insights into the prognosis and mechanisms of therapy resistance, which is still an urgent problem in the treatment of multiple types of cancer. Here, we provide an overview of multiplex imaging technologies and concepts of downstream analysis methods to investigate cell–cell interactions, how these studies have advanced cancer research, and their potential clinical implications.
Collapse
|
12
|
Yu DL, Lou ZP, Ma FY, Najafi M. The interactions of paclitaxel with tumour microenvironment. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 105:108555. [PMID: 35121223 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Today, it is well-known that the interactions and secretion within the tumour are crucial to consider for cancer therapy. Some novel cancer therapy modalities such as immunotherapy or tumour vaccination therapy work based on the control of interactions within the tumour microenvironment (TME). It has been revealed that anti-cancer drugs or radiotherapy can modulate some interactions in favour of cancer therapy. However, they may induce some mechanisms to increase the resistance of cancer cells to therapy. Paclitaxel is known as the first approved herbal derived chemotherapy drug. Although the main known anti-cancer effect of paclitaxel is the inhibition of the cell cycle, today, it has been well known that paclitaxel may suppress the tumour via modulating several interactions in TME. Furthermore, paclitaxel may increase the expression of some tumour resistance drivers. This review aims to discuss the interactions within TME following treatment with paclitaxel. The effects of paclitaxel on the anti-tumour immunity, immunosuppressive cells, hypoxia, and also angiogenesis will be discussed. The targeting of these interactions may be interesting to increase therapy efficiency using the combination modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding-Li Yu
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, Zhejiang 311800, China.
| | - Zhi-Ping Lou
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, Zhejiang 311800, China
| | - Feng-Yun Ma
- Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Zhuji, Zhejiang 311800, China
| | - Masoud Najafi
- Medical Technology Research Center, Institute of Health Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran; Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bui QL, Mas L, Hollebecque A, Tougeron D, de la Fouchardière C, Pudlarz T, Alouani E, Guimbaud R, Taieb J, André T, Colle R, Cohen R. Treatments after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with dMMR/MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020406. [PMID: 35053568 PMCID: PMC8774125 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Several studies suggested an enhanced efficacy of conventional treatments (CT, i.e., chemotherapy +/− targeted therapy) administered after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in certain tumor types, but no data are available concerning metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients harboring mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI). The aim of our study was to assess the outcomes of dMMR/MSI mCRC patients receiving CT after ICI failure. We retrospectively collected clinical data from a multicentric cohort of 31 patients. Although limited by the small number of patients, our results did not suggest improved outcomes with CT in our population, and no significant association with previous ICI efficacy or with anti-VEGF agents was evidenced. However, prolonged disease control was observed in several cases, suggesting that some patients might derive an unexpected benefit from post-ICI treatments. With ICI becoming the standard of care in patients newly diagnosed with dMMR/MSI mCRC, these results might help to inform clinical decision-making and to guide future therapeutic strategies for these patients. Abstract Background: Several studies reported improved outcomes with conventional treatments (CT, i.e., chemotherapy ± targeted therapy) administered after immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) in certain tumor types. No data are available concerning patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI). We aimed to assess the outcomes of dMMR/MSI mCRC pts receiving CT after ICI failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study investigating the outcomes of all dMMR/MSI mCRC pts who received post-ICI CT between 2015 and 2020. Results: 31 pts (male 61%, median age 56 years) were included. ICI was an anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy in 71% of pts, and 61% received >2 lines before post-ICI CT. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 13% and 45%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of 2.9 and 7.4 months, respectively. No association of the outcomes with either ICI efficacy or anti-angiogenic agents was observed. Prolonged PFS (range 16.1–21.3 months) was observed in 4 pts (13%). Conclusions: Although conducted on a limited number of patients, our results do not support an association of previous ICI treatment with an enhanced efficacy of CT in dMMR/MSI mCRC. However, prolonged disease control was observed in several cases, suggesting that some pts might derive an unexpected benefit from post-ICI treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quang Loc Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
- The Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi 116300, Vietnam
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 123105, Vietnam
| | - Léo Mas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
| | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Saclay University of Paris, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France;
| | | | - Thomas Pudlarz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
| | - Emily Alouani
- Digestive Medical Oncology Department, CHU Toulouse—IUCT Rangueil-Larrey, 31059 Toulouse, France; (E.A.); (R.G.)
| | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Digestive Medical Oncology Department, CHU Toulouse—IUCT Rangueil-Larrey, 31059 Toulouse, France; (E.A.); (R.G.)
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75004 Paris, France;
| | - Thierry André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Raphaël Colle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
| | - Romain Cohen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kakade VR, Weiss M, Cantley LG. Using Imaging Mass Cytometry to Define Cell Identities and Interactions in Human Tissues. Front Physiol 2021; 12:817181. [PMID: 35002783 PMCID: PMC8727440 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.817181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of highly multiplexed imaging techniques that can be applied to study complex cellular microenvironments, this review characterizes the use of imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to study the human kidney. We provide technical details for antibody validation, cell segmentation, and data analysis specifically tailored to human kidney samples, and elaborate on phenotyping of kidney cell types and novel insights that IMC can provide regarding pathophysiological processes in the injured or diseased kidney. This review will provide the reader with the necessary background to understand both the power and the limitations of IMC and thus support better perception of how IMC analysis can improve our understanding of human disease pathogenesis and can be integrated with other technologies such as single cell sequencing and proteomics to provide spatial context to cellular data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lloyd G. Cantley
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kankeu Fonkoua LA, Yoon HH. Rapidly Evolving Treatment Landscape for Metastatic Esophagogastric Carcinoma: Review of Recent Data. Onco Targets Ther 2021; 14:4361-4381. [PMID: 34385820 PMCID: PMC8352646 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s216047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that collectively represent the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. While surgery in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy represents the primary curative treatment for early stage disease, survival outcomes for the majority of patients with later-stage disease remain poor. Cytotoxic chemotherapy with platinum doublets such as 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin is the mainstay of treatment with incremental benefits provided by targeted therapy (trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan, ramucirumab) and immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, nivolumab). In this article, we provide an updated review and perspectives on the management of advanced EGC. We examine the distinct epidemiological, etiological and molecular features of each disease entity comprising EGC. After reviewing the critical studies that established conventional systemic cytotoxic and targeted therapeutics, we elaborate on recent promising and complex data with immune checkpoint inhibition focusing on implications of tumor histology and PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment. We also highlight novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to build on these recent advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Aurelien Kankeu Fonkoua
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Harry H Yoon
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|