1
|
Helgestad ADL, Andersen B, Njor SH, Larsen MB. The association of demographic and socioeconomic variables with cancer screening participation: A national cross-sectional study of three cancer screening programs in Denmark. Heliyon 2024; 10:e31163. [PMID: 39044972 PMCID: PMC11263647 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyze the demographic and socioeconomic determinants of non-participation in cervical, colorectal and breast cancer screening programs in Denmark. Study design and setting We conducted a cross-sectional study involving all women aged 53-65 years residing in Denmark on March 31, 2018, utilizing comprehensive individual data from population registries. Logistic regression models were employed to assess associations between demographic and socioeconomic factors and non-participation compared with participating in one, two, and three cancer screening programs, presenting odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Both unadjusted and adjusted models were applied for each level of screening participation. Results Significant associations with non-participation in the three cancer screening programs were observed across all demographic and socioeconomic covariates considered. Women with low incomes demonstrated the highest likelihood of non-participation (none vs. three programs attended, OR: 2.95, 95 % CI: 2.82-3.08). Similarly, increased odds of non-participation were noted among immigrants (Western immigrants: OR: 2.08, 95 % CI: 1.96-2.21; non-Western immigrants OR 1.26 95 % CI: 1.20-1.32), women living alone (OR: 2.08, 95 % CI: 2.02-2.14), women outside the labor force (OR: 1.92, 95 % CI: 1.86-1.99), and women with lower educational levels (OR: 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.39-1.50) in the model comparing non-participation to participating in three screening programs. A progressive intensification of the association with non-participation was noted with each incremental increase in screening participation (from one to two to three programs). Conclusions Demographic and socioeconomic variables are significantly associated with non-participation in all three Danish cancer screening programs, particularly affecting women from vulnerable demographic and socioeconomic backgrounds. Future research should prioritize strategies to enhance participation within this subgroup, aiming to alleviate social inequities in cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Dorte Lerche Helgestad
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NO, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NO, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Sisse Helle Njor
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Data, Innovation and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NO, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Research Unit, Horsens Regional Hospital, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Sheng C, Lyu Z, Dai H, Song F, Song F, Huang Y, Chen K. Effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening integrating non-genetic and genetic risk: a prospective study based on UK Biobank data. Cancer Biol Med 2024; 21:j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0096. [PMID: 38899940 PMCID: PMC11359493 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Few studies have evaluated the benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening integrating both non-genetic and genetic risk factors. Here, we aimed to integrate an existing non-genetic risk model (QCancer-10) and a 139-variant polygenic risk score to evaluate the effectiveness of screening on CRC incidence and mortality. METHODS We applied the integrated model to calculate 10-year CRC risk for 430,908 participants in the UK Biobank, and divided the participants into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. We calculated the screening-associated hazard ratios (HRs) and absolute risk reductions (ARRs) for CRC incidence and mortality according to risk stratification. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 11.03 years and 12.60 years, we observed 5,158 CRC cases and 1,487 CRC deaths, respectively. CRC incidence and mortality were significantly lower among screened than non-screened participants in both the intermediate- and high-risk groups [incidence: HR: 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.94; 0.81, 0.73-0.90; mortality: 0.75, 0.64-0.87; 0.70, 0.58-0.85], which composed approximately 60% of the study population. The ARRs (95% CI) were 0.17 (0.11-0.24) and 0.43 (0.24-0.61), respectively, for CRC incidence, and 0.08 (0.05-0.11) and 0.24 (0.15-0.33), respectively, for mortality. Screening did not significantly reduce the relative or absolute risk of CRC incidence and mortality in the low-risk group. Further analysis revealed that screening was most effective for men and individuals with distal CRC among the intermediate to high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS After integrating both genetic and non-genetic factors, our findings provided priority evidence of risk-stratified CRC screening and valuable insights for the rational allocation of health resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Chao Sheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Zhangyan Lyu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Hongji Dai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Fangfang Song
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Fengju Song
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Yubei Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Kexin Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Human Major Diseases, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Honaker MD, Burch AE, Wong JH, Akram WM, Irish WD. A Novel Approach to Analyze Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Mortality. J Surg Res 2024; 298:347-354. [PMID: 38663261 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reducing disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates and mortality remains a priority. Mitigation strategies to reduce these disparities have largely been unsuccessful. The primary aim is to determine variables in models of healthcare utilization and their association with CRC screening and mortality in North Carolina. METHODS A cross-sectional analysis of publicly available data across North Carolina using variable reduction techniques with clustering to evaluate association of CRC screening rates and mortality was performed. RESULTS Three million sixty-five thousand five hundred thirty-seven residents (32.1%) were aged 50 y or more. More than two-thirds (68.8%) were White, while 20.5% were Black. Approximately 61% aged 50 y or more underwent CRC screening (range: 44.0%-80.5%) and had a CRC mortality of 44.8 per 100,000 (range 22.8 to 76.6 per 100,000). Cluster analysis identified two factors, designated social economic education index (factor 1) and rural provider index (factor 2) for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. CRC screening rates were associated with factor 1, consisting of socioeconomic and education variables, and factor 2, comprised of the number of providers per 10,000 individuals aged 50 y or more and rurality. An increase in both factors 1 and 2 by one point would result in an increase in CRC screening rated by 6.8%. CRC mortality was associated with factor 2. An increase in one point in factor 1 results in a decrease in mortality risk by 10.9%. CONCLUSIONS In North Carolina, using variable reduction with clustering, CRC screening rates were associated with the inter-relationship of the number of providers and rurality, while CRC mortality was associated with the inter-relationship of social, economic, and education variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Honaker
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
| | - Ashley E Burch
- Department of Health Services and Information Management, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Jan H Wong
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Warqaa M Akram
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - William D Irish
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ola I, Cardoso R, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests across European countries: a cross-sectional analysis of the European health interview survey 2018-2020. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 41:100920. [PMID: 38707865 PMCID: PMC11067466 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, and most European countries have started to implement CRC screening programs in the past 20 years. Consequently, this study aimed to estimate the utilization of fecal tests and colonoscopy, as well as investigate factors associated with their utilization based on specific screening program characteristics in European countries. Methods We analyzed data from the European Health Interview Survey 2018-2020 to determine the utilization of fecal tests [guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)] within the preceding 2 years or colonoscopy within the preceding 10 years among people aged 50-74 years, based on the type of screening offered in each country. Using multivariable logistic regression and sub-group meta-analysis, factors associated with screening use were determined. Findings The analyses included data from 129,750 respondents across 29 European countries, with participant counts ranging from 1511 individuals in Iceland to 11,755 individuals in Germany. Unit response rates ranged from 22% to 88%. The use of either test was highest among countries with fully rolled-out programs with fecal tests [from 37.7% (867/2379) in Croatia to 74.9% (2321/3085) in Denmark] and in countries offering colonoscopy as an alternative screening method [from 26.2% (854/3329) in Greece to 75.4% (1192/1760) in Luxembourg]. We observed the lowest utilization of either test in countries with no program or small-scale programs [6.3% (195/3179) in Bulgaria to 34.2% (722/2144) in Latvia]. Across all types of screening offers, younger age, being without a partner, low education, rural residence, and living in large households were associated with lower utilization, as were poor lifestyle scores and prolonged periods without physician consultation. Interpretation Our findings point to large disparities and much room for improvement in CRC screening offers and utilization across Europe. Funding There was no funding source for this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idris Ola
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Rafael Cardoso
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhargava S, Gjesvik J, Thy J, Larsen M, Hofvind S. Breast cancer-specific survival among immigrants and non-immigrants invited to BreastScreen Norway. J Migr Health 2024; 9:100222. [PMID: 39263378 PMCID: PMC11390177 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We have previously shown that immigrants have lower attendance in BreastScreen Norway than non-immigrants and that non-Western immigrants have lower incidence of breast cancer, but more advanced disease. Purpose To compare breast cancer-specific survival for immigrants versus non-immigrants diagnosed with screen-detected or symptomatic breast cancer. Material and methods We analyzed data from 28,320 women aged 50-69 diagnosed with breast cancer after being invited to BreastScreen Norway. We divided women into three groups; non-immigrants, immigrants from Western countries and immigrants from non-Western countries. We stratified our analyses according to detection mode (screen-detected breast cancer, interval cancer and cancer detected outside screening), and used cox regression to model the association between immigrants/non-immigrants and time to breast cancer death. Results Among screen-detected breast cancers, 28.7% were histologic grade 3 among immigrants from non-Western countries compared to 21.3% among non-immigrants. Interval cancers and cancers detected outside screening had larger tumor diameter and a higher percentage were histologic grade 3 and lymph node positive among immigrants from non-Western countries compared to non-immigrants. Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) adjusted for age and year of diagnosis for time to breast cancer death compared to non-immigrants was 0.70 (0.39-1.27) for immigrants from Western countries and 0.52 (0.23-1.17) for immigrants from non-Western countries. Conclusion Despite more advanced histopathological tumor characteristics among immigrants from non-Western countries compared to non-immigrants, we did not observe statistically significant differences in breast-cancer specific survival between the two groups. Keeping in mind the low number of breast cancer deaths and possible overestimation of survival among immigrants, this might imply that equity in outcome can be achieved through adequate follow-up and treatment despite inequal access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Bhargava
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Jonas Gjesvik
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonas Thy
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marthe Larsen
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Belon AP, McKenzie E, Teare G, Nykiforuk CIJ, Nieuwendyk L, Kim MO, Lee B, Adhikari K. Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:128. [PMID: 38263112 PMCID: PMC10807065 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death globally. CRC screening can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, socially disadvantaged groups may disproportionately benefit less from screening programs due to their limited access to healthcare. This poor access to healthcare services is further aggravated by intersecting, cumulative social factors associated with their sociocultural background and living conditions. This rapid review systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence on the effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) programs in increasing CRC screening in populations who do not have a regular healthcare provider or who have limited healthcare system access. METHODS We used three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and EBSCOhost CINAHL. We searched for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and quantitative and mixed-methods studies focusing on effectiveness of FIT programs (request or receipt of FIT kit, completion rates of FIT screening, and participation rates in follow-up colonoscopy after FIT positive results). For evidence synthesis, deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted. The findings were also classified using the Cochrane Methods Equity PROGRESS-PLUS framework. The quality of the included studies was assessed. RESULTS Findings from the 25 included primary studies were organized into three intervention design-focused themes. Delivery of culturally-tailored programs (e.g., use of language and interpretive services) were effective in increasing CRC screening. Regarding the method of delivery for FIT, specific strategies combined with mail-out programs (e.g., motivational screening letter) or in-person delivery (e.g., demonstration of FIT specimen collection procedure) enhanced the success of FIT programs. The follow-up reminder theme (e.g., spaced out and live reminders) were generally effective. Additionally, we found evidence of the social determinants of health affecting FIT uptake (e.g., place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, gender and/or sex). CONCLUSIONS Findings from this rapid review suggest multicomponent interventions combined with tailored strategies addressing the diverse, unique needs and priorities of the population with no regular healthcare provider or limited access to the healthcare system may be more effective in increasing FIT screening. Decision-makers and practitioners should consider equity and social factors when developing resources and coordinating efforts in the delivery and implementation of FIT screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula Belon
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Emily McKenzie
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Health Evidence and Impact, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Gary Teare
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Candace I J Nykiforuk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Laura Nieuwendyk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Minji Olivia Kim
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Bernice Lee
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Kamala Adhikari
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Liere ELSA, Jacobs IL, Dekker E, Jacobs MAJM, de Boer NKH, Ramsoekh D. Colonoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome is burdensome and frequently delayed. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:403-411. [PMID: 37171677 PMCID: PMC10176312 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-023-00333-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with Lynch syndrome have an increased colorectal cancer risk, hence, biennial colonoscopy surveillance is recommended. We aimed to investigate patients' perception and preferences regarding surveillance, and to further explore compliance behaviour. Individuals with Lynch syndrome received a validated survey evaluating experiences of their three most recent colonoscopies. Individuals were non-compliant to surveillance if the interval between colonoscopies differed ≥ 6 months from the recommended interval. In total, 197 of 291 (68%) invited individuals returned the survey. They mostly underwent colonoscopy biennially (99%), under mild sedation (79%) and with bowel preparation performed by Moviprep® (99%). Surveillance was perceived as impacting quality of life in 21%, and as moderately to extremely burdensome in 57%, particularly in those below age 40. To lower the burden, patients prioritised improvements in volume and taste of bowel preparation, laxation-related bowel movements, waiting times, and a more personal and respectful approach of endoscopic staff. Additionally, many individuals (60%) would favour less-invasive surveillance modalities such as biomarkers. In total, 28% of individuals had delayed colonoscopy surveillance, predominantly for patient-related reasons. An additional 10% considered quitting/postponing surveillance. Upon multivariable analysis, patient-related delay was associated with low and medium education, history of ≤ 4 colonoscopies and having no hospital recall-system. Colonoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome is often experienced as burdensome, and frequently delayed. We identified determinants of surveillance behaviour in this population, and present potential interventions to reduce the burden and non-compliance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsa L S A van Liere
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- School of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Imke L Jacobs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- School of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten A J M Jacobs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- School of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- School of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bhargava S, Botteri E, Berthelsen M, Iqbal N, Randel KR, Holme Ø, Berstad P. Lower participation among immigrants in colorectal cancer screening in Norway. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1254905. [PMID: 37822535 PMCID: PMC10562536 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1254905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Organized cancer screening programs should be equally accessible for all groups in society. We assessed differences in participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among different immigrant groups. Methods Between 2012 and 2019, 140,000 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomly invited to sigmoidoscopy or repeated faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in a CRC screening trial. In this study, we included 46,919 individuals invited to sigmoidoscopy and 70,018 invited to the first round of FIT between 2012 and 2017. We examined difference in participation between non-immigrants and immigrants, and within different immigrant groups by geographic area of origin, using logistic regression models, adjusted for several sociodemographic factors and health factors. Results In total, we included 106,695 non-immigrants and 10,242 immigrants. The participation rate for FIT was 60% among non-immigrants, 58% among immigrants from Western countries and 37% among immigrants from non-Western countries. The participation rate for sigmoidoscopy was 53% among non-immigrants, 48% among immigrants from Western countries and 23% among immigrants from non-Western countries. Compared to non-immigrants, multivariate adjusted odds ratio for non-participation in FIT screening was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.23) and 1.82 (1.69-1.96) for immigrants from Western and non-Western countries. The corresponding numbers in sigmoidoscopy screening were 1.34 (1.21-1.48) and 2.83 (2.55-3.14). The lowest participation was observed in immigrants from Eastern Europe, Northern Africa and Western Asia, and South-Central Asia. Conclusion Participation in CRC screening in Norway was particularly low among non-Western immigrants, which could put them at increased risk for late stage diagnosis of CRC. Participation was lower in sigmoidoscopy screening than in FIT screening, especially among immigrants from non-Western countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Bhargava
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mona Berthelsen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nadia Iqbal
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Research, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nafisi S, Randel KR, Støer NC, Veierød MB, Hoff G, Holme Ø, Schult AL, Botteri E. Association between use of low-dose aspirin and detection of colorectal polyps and cancer in a screening setting. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1126-1132. [PMID: 36754644 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.01.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The possible protective effect of aspirin on risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is still highly debated. METHODS We used data from Bowel Cancer Screening in Norway, a trial randomizing individuals from general population, aged 50-74 years, to flexible sigmoidoscopy or faecal immunochemical test (FIT), to study the association between aspirin use and detection of CRC and two CRC precursors: adenomas and advanced serrated lesions (ASL). Prescriptions of low-dose aspirin were obtained from Norwegian prescription database. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Among 64,889 screening participants (24,159 sigmoidoscopy, 40,730 FIT), 314 (0.5%) had CRC, 6,208 (9.6%) adenoma and 659 (1.0%) ASL. Overall and short-term use (<3 years) of low-dose aspirin, versus no use, were not associated with any colorectal lesion. Long-term use (≥3 years) was associated with lower detection of CRC (overall OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.46-0.93; sigmoidoscopy: 0.56, 0.33-0.97; FIT: 0.72, 0.45-1.15), adenomas in sigmoidoscopy arm (overall OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.87-1.03; sigmoidoscopy: 0.89, 0.80-0.99; FIT: 1.03, 0.89-1.18), but not ASLs. We did not observe significant differences in the effect of aspirin according to the location of colorectal lesions. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that long-term use of aspirin might have a protective effect against adenomas and colorectal cancer, but not ASLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Nafisi
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin R Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nathalie C Støer
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian Research Centre for Women's Health, Women's Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit B Veierød
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna L Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kirkøen B, Berstad P, Hoff G, Bernklev T, Randel KR, Holme Ø, de Lange T, Robb KA, Botteri E. Type and Severity of Mental Illness and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Prev Med 2023; 64:76-85. [PMID: 36216655 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs depends on the participation rate. This study examined the association between type and severity of mental illness and colorectal cancer screening participation. METHODS Between 2012 and 2017, a total of 46,919 individuals were invited to sigmoidoscopy screening in Norway, and 70,019 were invited to fecal immunochemical testing. In 2022, logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the use of antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, and antidepressants in the year preceding the screening invitation and screening participation, adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Defined daily doses of individual drugs were used to assess dose‒response relationships. RESULTS Overall, 19.2% (24.8% of women, 13.4% of men) of all invitees used at least 1 psychotropic medication. Nonparticipation in the 2 arms combined was associated with the use of anxiolytics (60.7% in users vs 43.2% in nonusers; OR=1.53; 95% CI=1.45, 1.62) and antipsychotics (64.3% vs 43.8%; OR=1.41; 95% CI=1.30, 1.53) and increased with higher doses for both drugs. Hypnotics and antidepressants were only weakly associated with nonparticipation in higher doses. Participation rates were 57.3%, 52.3%, 42.9%, and 35.4% in those prescribed 0, 1, 2, and 3-4 classes of psychotropic medications, respectively. The associations between the use of psychotropic medications and nonparticipation were similar for the 2 screening tests. CONCLUSIONS These findings show significant disparities in colorectal cancer screening participation for individuals with mental illness, independent of the screening method. Moreover, screening participation varied depending on the type and severity of mental illness. Targeted interventions are warranted to ensure that people with mental illness are supported to access the benefits of colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedicte Kirkøen
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (RBUP), Oslo, Norway.
| | - Paula Berstad
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Kristin R Randel
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway; Institute of Health & Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Medical Research, Bærum Hospital, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Kathryn A Robb
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; and the Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhargava S, Czapka E, Hofvind S, Kristiansen M, Diaz E, Berstad P. Polish immigrants’ access to colorectal cancer screening in Norway – a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1332. [DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08719-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Norwegian colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme started in May 2022. Inequities in uptake of CRC screening is a concern, and we expect that immigrants are at risk of non-uptake. Immigrants from Poland are the most populous immigrant group in Norway. The purpose of this study was to identify and explore factors that may facilitate Polish immigrants’ access to the Norwegian CRC screening programme.
Material and methods
This study was based on qualitative interviews with ten Polish immigrants in Norway. The participants represented a convenience sample that varied in terms of gender, education, employment, time in Norway, place of residence, Norwegian language skills and ties to the Norwegian-Polish community. We performed thematic content analysis to understand CRC screening from the perspective of Polish immigrants, using transnationalism and Levesque’s conceptualization of accessibility as theoretical frameworks.
Results
We grouped our findings into three themes; “understanding of CRC development and the need to access health care”, “binationalism” and “improving accessibility through information”. Within these themes, various factors influenced the participants’ accessibility to CRC screening, namely knowledge about the screening and about causes, development and prevention of the disease, language, choice of screening country, trust in health personnel’s competence, information needs, methods and sources, as well as participants’ perception of the faecal immunochemical test screening user manual. These factors were further influenced by communication between the Polish community in Norway and Poland, as well as travel between the countries.
Conclusion
We identified several factors that can be targeted with an aim to increase Polish immigrants’ access to the Norwegian CRC screening programme. Effective measures could include increasing cultural competence among health care providers and providing information in Polish through Polish-speaking health care professionals, general practitioners and internet portals used by the Polish-speaking community. Focusing on accessibility in a transnational setting, our findings may be of interest for policy makers and service providers planning preventive health measures for immigrants.
Collapse
|
12
|
The impact of driving time on participation in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical blood test. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 80:102244. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
13
|
Kværner AS, Birkeland E, Vinberg E, Hoff G, Hjartåker A, Rounge TB, Berstad P. Associations of red and processed meat intake with screen-detected colorectal lesions. Br J Nutr 2022:1-11. [PMID: 36069337 DOI: 10.1017/s0007114522002860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Limited data exist regarding the role of meat consumption in early-stage colorectal carcinogenesis. We examined associations of red and processed meat intake with screen-detected colorectal lesions in immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT)-positive participants, enrolled in the Norwegian CRCbiome study during 2017-2021, aged 55-77 years. Absolute and energy-adjusted intakes of red and processed meat (combined and individually) were assessed using a validated, semi-quantitative FFQ. Associations between meat intake and screen-detected colorectal lesions were examined using multinomial logistic regression analyses with adjustment for key covariates. Of 1162 participants, 319 presented with advanced colorectal lesions at colonoscopy. High v. low energy-adjusted intakes of red and processed meat combined, as well as red meat alone, were borderline to significantly positively associated with advanced colorectal lesions (OR of 1·24 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·57) and 1·34 (95 % CI 1·07, 1·69), respectively). A significant dose-response relationship was also observed for absolute intake levels (OR of 1·32 (95 % CI 1·09, 1·60) per 100 g/d increase in red and processed meat). For processed meat, no association was observed between energy-adjusted intakes and advanced colorectal lesions. A significant positive association was, however, observed for participants with absolute intake levels ≥ 100 v. < 50 g/d (OR of 1·19 (95 % CI 1·09, 1·31)). In summary, high intakes of red and processed meat were associated with presence of advanced colorectal lesions at colonoscopy in FIT-positive participants. The study demonstrates a potential role of dietary data to improve the performance of FIT-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Sørlie Kværner
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Birkeland
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elina Vinberg
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | | | - Trine B Rounge
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|