Is There a Chemical Memory Trace?

The stability of memories during brain remodeling: A perspective

One of the most important features of the nervous system is memory: the ability to represent and store experiences, in a manner that alters behavior and cognition at future times when the original stimulus is no longer present. However, the brain is not always an anatomically stable structure: many animal species regenerate all or part of the brain after severe injury, or remodel their CNS toward a new configuration as part of their life cycle. This raises a fascinating question: what are the dynamics of memories during brain regeneration? Can stable memories remain intact when cellular turnover and spatial rearrangement modify the biological hardware within which experiences are stored? What can we learn from model species that exhibit both, regeneration and memory, with respect to robustness and stability requirements for long-term memories encoded in living tissues? In this Perspective, we discuss relevant data in regenerating planaria, metamorphosing insects, and hibernating ground squirrels. While much remains to be done to understand this remarkable process, molecular-level insight will have important implications for cognitive science, regenerative medicine of the brain, and the development of non-traditional computational media in synthetic bioengineering.

Scotophobin A causes dark avoidance in goldfish by elevating pineal N-acetylserotonin

We had shown that synthetic rat scotophobin A caused several effects upon goldfish, apparently mediated by the pineal gland. Here we report that norepinephrine decreased goldfish dark avoidance in a manner that was blocked by scotophobin or pinealectomy. Increased dark avoidance was caused by either propranolol or scotophobin alone. Certain components of the pineal melatonin pathway also affected goldfish light-dark preference: serotonin, and especially N-acetylserotonin, increased dark avoidance, as did the hydroxyindole-O-methyl-transferase (HIOMT) product inhibitor, S-adenosyl-homocysteine. Melatonin and S-adenosyl-methionine were without effect in this regard. Pinealectomy prevented the dark avoidance increase caused by serotonin and N-acetylserotonin. These data suggested that increased dark avoidance behavior in goldfish was correlated with N-acetylserotonin buildup in the pineal, and that scotophobin could cause this, if it were to inhibit pineal HIOMT. To test this hypothesis the effect of various agents upon pineal melatonin levels was determined. Scotophobin was found to both reduce pineal melatonin and to block the melatonin-increasing effect of N-acetylserotonin. This led to the discovery that, indeed, scotophobin was an effective inhibitor (KI50, 6 x 10(-7) M) of purified bovine HIOMT.

Pineal hydroxyindole-O-methyltransferase: mechanism, and inhibition by scotophobin A

We had shown that the behaviorally active peptide, scotophobin A, a synthetic analogue of native scotophobin, acted to increase dark avoidance in goldfish by inhibiting pineal hydroxyindole-O-methyltransferase (HIOMT), the enzyme which converts N-acetylserotonin (NAS) to melatonin (MEL). Here we determine the reaction sequence of bovine pineal HIOMT and the mechanism whereby scotophobin A inhibits this enzyme. Initial rate studies in which the substrates NAS and the methyl donor, S-adenosylmethionine SAM), were independently varied indicated the enzyme reacted by a sequential mechanism. With the product, S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), included in the reaction mixtures, data were obtained consistent with the following order of substrate addition and product discharge: (see text). The turnover number was 5.7 moles melatonin formed/mole HIOMT/min. The substrate KMs were 4.2 x 10(-4) M for NAS and 4.9 x 10(-5) M for SAM. Further studies showed that scotophobin A is an inhibitor (KI = 7 x 10(-7) M) competitive with NAS, indicating that this peptide combines with the enzyme-SAM complex. The structural similarity of the tyrosinamide end of scotophobin A to NAS and several other HIOMT inhibitors, including two antischizophrenic drugs, is consistent with these observations.

Isolation and identification of two learning-induced brain peptides

Goldfish were trained either to avoid the blue compartment of a tank and swim into the green compartment or, conversely, to avoid green and prefer blue. Preliminary experiments indicated that acquisition of the avoidance behavior was associated with the presence in the brain of two peptides, one found in blue avoiding (BA), another in green avoiding (GA) fish. With the help of behavioral bioassays, the peptides were isolated and purified, and their structure was determined by ultrasmicroanalytical techniques. The sequence of the BA peptide, pglu-ile-gly-ala-val-phe-pro-leu-lys-tyr-gly-ser-lys-OH was reproduced by synthesis. Sequential analysis of the GA peptide gave two alternative structures, NAc-lys-gly-gln-ile-ala-val-phe-pro-leu-lys-tyr-gly-ser-OH or NAc-lys-gly-ala-val-gln-ile-phe-pro-lys-tyr-gly-ser-OH, both of which are being synthetized to be compared with the natural compound. Overlapping sequences between the BA and GA peptides suggest the existence of a family of peptides associated with behavior based on color discrimination.