Assessment of sexually related personal distress accompanying premenopausal sexual dysfunction with an Arabic version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale

Instruments for assessing sexual dysfunction in Arabic: A systematic literature review

Sexual health is relevant throughout a person's life; however, studying human sexuality is complex and requires particular care when working with individuals from different cultural and social backgrounds. Much of the research addressing this subject has been conducted in Western countries, and that in non-Western countries is generally based on small sample sizes. The biopsychosocial nature of sexuality and its dysfunctions should be taken into consideration given that it is indispensable when conducting and assessing sexual studies in different countries and cultures. Therefore, culturally sensitive studies that consider cultural contexts and determinants as well as social markers are needed. The topic of sexuality in Arab culture is still enigmatic. This enigma has impacted the advancement of sexual science and limited researchers, health care practitioners, and patients. Thus, the aim of this systematic literature review was to find and assemble all scales and questionnaires regarding human sexual health that have been translated into Arabic and validated in order to promote a critical analysis of the methods used in each instrument and to inform readers and researchers of the limits and potential of each scale. Electronic databases were systematically searched, and eight instruments were selected for inclusion: the Arabic Index of Premature Ejaculation (AIPE), the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), the Arabic Female Sexual Function Index (ArFSFI), the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (AVFGSIS), the Arabic Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX), the Egyptian Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-IR), the Saudi Arabian Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire in Arabic (PSIQ-IR), and the Arabic Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS). All included instruments showed good validity and reliability for the target population. Future studies are needed to develop culturally sensitive instruments.

Conceptualization and Inventory of the Sexual and Psychological Burden of Women With Pelvic Floor Complaints; A Mixed-Method Study

Introduction

Despite the fact that the literature reports various restrictions and types of distress in women with pelvic floor complaints, a comprehensive overview of women's sexual and psychological burden emerging from these complaints is lacking, which compromises our ability to assess and grasp the impact to women.

Aim

This study was performed to conceptualize women's sexual and psychological burden and create a more comprehensive overview on this topic from both women's and health care providers’ perspectives. Furthermore, this research intended to identify items to populate a to-be-developed instrument to assess sexual and psychological burden.

Methods

In Group Concept Mapping, 125 statements were used about restrictions and distress that women with pelvic floor complaints experienced. Women with, and health care providers with and without pelvic floor complaints (13 women and 3 men) sorted the statements into comprehensive self-labeled clusters and rated their nature and severity. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses were performed to identify a conceptual model of coherent clusters of statements. Item-total correlations of severity scores were calculated to identify statements that can be used in future research to represent women's sexual and psychological burden.

Main Outcome Measure

A conceptual model emerged, and outcomes of item-total correlations were then examined again using the conceptual model.

Results

Seven distress clusters were identified, namely, loss of control, sexual distress, feeling insecure, feeling wronged, feeling helpless, feeling angry, and feeling disappointed. Feeling insecure appeared more pervasive than other distresses. Furthermore, 33 statements were identified that can be used in future research to develop an instrument to assess sexual and psychological burden representing both women's and health care providers’ perspectives.

Conclusion

The conceptual model and list of statements may concisely represent the sexual and psychological burden of women with pelvic floor complaints from both women's and health care providers’ perspectives on this topic.

Brand AM, Rosas S, Waterink W, et al. Conceptualization and Inventory of the Sexual and Psychological Burden of Women With Pelvic Floor Complaints; A Mixed-Method Study. Sex Med 2022;10:100504.

Instruments for Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Patients with Generalized Acquired Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder

Screening, diagnosis, and management of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and research into the condition have been challenging due to its biopsychosocial complexity and lack of consensus on relevant measures. Although physician interviews yield much clinically valid information, self-reported questionnaires appear more acceptable to patients and physicians. Consequently, validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools are essential for evaluation and management of HSDD, including any therapeutic intervention. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued guidance on the use of appropriate endpoints and associated measures for female sexual dysfunction, including HSDD. Although many of the available measures were not designed specifically for HSDD assessment, as per FDA guidelines, most clinical studies have used individual domains or items from established tools, such as the Female Sexual Function Index-desire domain and Item 13 of the revised Female Sexual Distress Scale. For clinical practice, several professional societies recommend the Decreased Sexual Desire Screener and/or a sexual history as tools to diagnose HSDD. This review discusses frequently used PRO tools as well as the newly developed and validated Elements of Desire Questionnaire, which may be appropriate for clinical trials or clinical practice.

The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

INTRODUCTION

The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a patient-reported outcome measure measuring female sexual dysfunction. The FSFI-19 was developed with 6 theoretical subscales in 2000. In 2010, a shortened version became available (FSFI-6).

AIM

To investigate the measurement properties of the FSFI-19 and FSFI-6.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed of Embase, Medline, and Web of Science for studies that investigated measurement properties of the FSFI-19 or FSFI-6 up to April 2018. Data were extracted and analyzed according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Evidence was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate, and quality of evidence as very high, high, moderate, or low.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Main Outcome Measure is the evidence of a measurement property, and the quality of evidence based on the COSMIN guidelines.

RESULTS

83 studies were included. Concerning the FSFI-19, the evidence for internal consistency was sufficient and of moderate quality. The evidence for reliability was sufficient but of low quality. The evidence for criterion validity was sufficient and of high quality. The evidence for structural validity was inconsistent of low quality. The evidence for construct validity was inconsistent of moderate quality. Concerning the FSFI-6, the evidence for criterion validity was sufficient of moderate quality. The evidence for internal consistency was rated as indeterminate. The evidence for reliability was inconsistent of low quality. The evidence for construct validity was inconsistent of very low quality. No information was available on structural validity of the FSFI-6, and measurement error, responsiveness, and cross-cultural validity of both FSFI-6 and FSFI-19.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Conflicting and lack of evidence for some of the measurement properties of the FSFI-19 and FSFI-6 indicates the importance of further research on the validity of these patient-reported outcome measures. We advise researchers who use the FSFI-19 to perform confirmatory factor analyses and report the factor structure found in their sample. Regardless of these concerns, the FSFI-19 and FSFI-6 have strong criterion validity. Pragmatically, they are good screening tools for the current definition of female sexual dysfunction.

STRENGTH & LIMITATION

A strong point of the review is the use of predefined guidelines. A limitation is the use of a precise rather than a sensitive search filter.

CONCLUSIONS

The FSFI requires more research on structural validity (FSFI-19 and FSFI-6), reliability (FSFI-6), construct validity (FSFI-19), measurement error (FSFI-19 and FSFI-6), and responsiveness (FSFI-19 and FSFI-6). Further corroboration of measurement invariance (both across cultures and across subpopulations) in the factor structure of the FSFI-19 is necessary, as well as tests for the unidimensionality of the FSFI-6. Neijenhuijs KI, Hooghiemstra N, Holtmaat K, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. J Sex Med 2019;16:640-660.