1
|
Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, Bruns DE, Horvath AR, Lernmark Å, Metzger BE, Nathan DM, Kirkman MS. Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2023; 46:e151-e199. [PMID: 37471273 PMCID: PMC10516260 DOI: 10.2337/dci23-0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous laboratory tests are used in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these assays varies substantially. APPROACH An expert committee compiled evidence-based recommendations for laboratory analysis in screening, diagnosis, or monitoring of diabetes. The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were evaluated. The draft consensus recommendations were evaluated by invited reviewers and presented for public comment. Suggestions were incorporated as deemed appropriate by the authors (see Acknowledgments). The guidelines were reviewed by the Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine Committee and the Board of Directors of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and by the Professional Practice Committee of the American Diabetes Association. CONTENT Diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased concentrations of glucose in venous plasma or increased hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the blood. Glycemic control is monitored by the people with diabetes measuring their own blood glucose with meters and/or with continuous interstitial glucose monitoring (CGM) devices and also by laboratory analysis of HbA1c. The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, and measurement of ketones, autoantibodies, urine albumin, insulin, proinsulin, and C-peptide are addressed. SUMMARY The guidelines provide specific recommendations based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes are found to have minimal clinical value at the present time, and measurement of them is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B. Sacks
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mark Arnold
- Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - George L. Bakris
- Department of Medicine, American Heart Association Comprehensive Hypertension Center, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - David E. Bruns
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Andrea R. Horvath
- New South Wales Health Pathology Department of Chemical Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Åke Lernmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University/CRC, Skane University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Boyd E. Metzger
- Division of Endocrinology, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - David M. Nathan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - M. Sue Kirkman
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, Bruns DE, Horvath AR, Lernmark Å, Metzger BE, Nathan DM, Kirkman MS. Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Chem 2023:hvad080. [PMID: 37473453 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous laboratory tests are used in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these assays varies substantially. APPROACH An expert committee compiled evidence-based recommendations for laboratory analysis in screening, diagnosis, or monitoring of diabetes. The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were evaluated. The draft consensus recommendations were evaluated by invited reviewers and presented for public comment. Suggestions were incorporated as deemed appropriate by the authors (see Acknowledgments). The guidelines were reviewed by the Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine Committee and the Board of Directors of the American Association of Clinical Chemistry and by the Professional Practice Committee of the American Diabetes Association. CONTENT Diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased concentrations of glucose in venous plasma or increased hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c) in the blood. Glycemic control is monitored by the people with diabetes measuring their own blood glucose with meters and/or with continuous interstitial glucose monitoring (CGM) devices and also by laboratory analysis of Hb A1c. The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, and measurement of ketones, autoantibodies, urine albumin, insulin, proinsulin, and C-peptide are addressed. SUMMARY The guidelines provide specific recommendations based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes are found to have minimal clinical value at the present time, and measurement of them is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Sacks
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Mark Arnold
- Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - George L Bakris
- Department of Medicine, American Heart Association Comprehensive Hypertension Center, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, ILUnited States
| | - David E Bruns
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Andrea R Horvath
- New South Wales Health Pathology Department of Chemical Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Åke Lernmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University/CRC, Skane University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Boyd E Metzger
- Division of Endocrinology, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - David M Nathan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - M Sue Kirkman
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pirmatova D, Dodkhoeva M, Hasbargen U, Flemmer AW, Abdusamatzoda Z, Saburova K, Salieva N, Radzhabova S, Parhofer KG. Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy Outcomes: Results from a Multicentric Study in Tajikistan. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2022; 130:821-827. [PMID: 35882368 PMCID: PMC9811532 DOI: 10.1055/a-1869-4159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence of gestational diabetes parallels the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, these data are not available for many parts of the world. We assessed the prevalence of gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes in Tajikistan. This cohort study included 2438 consecutively recruited representative pregnant women from 8 locations in two cities in Tajikistan, in whom an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g, fasting, 1 h, 2 h) was performed during gestational weeks 24-28. Women with known diabetes and twin pregnancies were excluded. Associations between glucose tolerance test results and pregnancy outcomes were examined. According to the WHO 2013 thresholds, 32.4% of women qualified as having gestational diabetes, the vast majority (29.7%) based on an elevated fasting glucose level (5.1-5.6 mmol/L), while only 2.8% had elevated 1- or 2-hour values or met more than one threshold. Women with only elevated fasting glucose (impaired gestational fasting glycemia) had no evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, while those with elevated 1- and/or 2-hour values (impaired gestational glucose tolerance) had more pregnancy complications (infection of urinary tract 1.8 vs. 8.8% p<0.001; preeclampsia 0.7 vs. 10.3% p<0.001) and emergency cesarean sections (4.4 vs. 13.2% p=0.002). Neonates from pregnancies with impaired gestational glucose tolerance had lower APGARs, lower birth weights, lower 30 min glucose levels, and a lower probability of being discharged alive (all p<0.05). In conclusion, the formal prevalence of gestational diabetes is high in Tajikistan; however, this does not translate into adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with impaired gestational fasting glycemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilnoza Pirmatova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No 1, Avicenna Tajik State
Medical University (ATSMU), Rudaki av., Dushanbe, Tajikistan,Center for International Health (CIH), LMU, Munich,
Germany
| | - Munavvara Dodkhoeva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No 1, Avicenna Tajik State
Medical University (ATSMU), Rudaki av., Dushanbe, Tajikistan
| | - Uwe Hasbargen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology LMU Medical Center, Munich,
Germany
| | - Andreas W. Flemmer
- Div. Neonatology, University Children’s Hospital and Perinatal
Center, LMU Medical Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Zulfiya Abdusamatzoda
- Ministry of Health and Social Protection of the Population of the
Republic of Tajikistan, Shevchenko, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
| | - Khursheda Saburova
- Department of Delivery, Khatlon Regional Clinical Hospital named after
Buri Vokhidov, Bokhtar, Tajikistan
| | - Nasiba Salieva
- Department of Neonatology, State Institution Health Complex
«Istiklol», N. Karaboev av. Dushanbe, Tajikistan
| | - Surayyo Radzhabova
- Department of Reproductive Health, City Health Center, Dushanbe,
Tajikistan
| | - Klaus G. Parhofer
- Medical Department IV, LMU Medical Center, Munich,
Germany,Center for International Health (CIH), LMU, Munich,
Germany,Correspondence Prof. Dr. Klaus G.
Parhofer Medizinische Klinik IV – Grosshadern,
LMU KlinikumMarchioninistr.
1581377 MunichGermany+49–89–4400–73010–
78879
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li HY, Sheu WHH. Updates for hyperglycemia in pregnancy: the ongoing journey for maternal-neonatal health. J Diabetes Investig 2022; 13:1652-1654. [PMID: 35794788 PMCID: PMC9533052 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We summarize updates of hyperglycemia in pregnancy as well as debate of diagnosis of criteria of gestational diabetes. We also point out several unsovled issues of gestataional diabetes that remain further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hung-Yuan Li
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|