Novel Insights into the Management of Patients with Very High Cardiovascular Risk Eligible for PCSK9 Inhibitor Treatment: Baseline Findings from the PERI-DYS Study

AIM

The PERI-DYS study aims to characterize two groups of patients with dyslipidaemia at very high CV risk: PCSK9i receivers and patients qualifying for but not receiving PCSK9i.

METHODS

This is an observational study by office-based and clinic-based physicians, mainly cardiologists and other internists in Germany, with data extracted from patient charts.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier NCT03110432.

RESULTS

A total of 1659 patients were enrolled across 70 sites. The majority of patients (91.0%) were reported as having mixed dyslipidaemia or non-familial or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. At enrolment, 794 (47.9%) of patients were PCSK9i receivers (of these 65.9% ongoing, and 34.1% newly treated within 30 days before their baseline visit). Among PCSK9i receivers, the majority had evolocumab 140 mg (n = 632, 38.1% of total). PCSK9i receivers compared to non-receivers were about 2 years younger and had a lower proportion of males. In terms of comorbidities, they had (statistically significantly) more often CAD, and less often PAD, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and chronic renal disease. The calculated untreated median LDL-C was 187 mg/dl (IQR 127; 270) in ongoing PCSK9i receivers, 212 mg/dl (IQR 132; 277) in newly treated PCSK9i receivers, and 179 mg/dl (IQR 129; 257) in non-receivers. Physician-reported statin intolerance was much more common in the two PCSK9i receiver groups as compared to non-receivers (67.3% versus 15.3%). Consequently, patients in the PCSK9i groups received fewer concomitant statins. Mean total cholesterol (143 vs. 172 mg/dl) and LDL-C (69 vs. 99 mg/dl) were considerably lower in ongoing PCSK9i receivers compared to non-receivers.

CONCLUSIONS

PCSK9i receivers are characterized by higher baseline LDL-C and a higher portion of statin intolerance compared to those qualified for but not-receiving PCSK9i treatment. On-treatment, LDL-C was lower in PCSK9i receivers. Ongoing follow-up will determine the prognostic importance of these findings.

Lipid Profile and Lipoprotein(a) Testing

BACKGROUND

The treatment of dyslipidemias plays a major role in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Proper evaluation of the patient's lipid status is very important for risk assessment and as a guide to treatment.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature, including current guidelines.

RESULTS

Measurement of the plasma concentration of cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, calculation of the non-HDL cholesterol concentration, and-on a single occasion-determination of the lipoprotein (a) concentration enable the clinician to quantify the lipid-associated health risk and monitor the effects of treatment. These blood tests can be performed in a non-fasting state except in special situations (particularly, hypertriglyceridemia). The HDL quotient is an obsolete measure. The main goal of treatment is to achieve an LDL-cholesterol level adequate to the patient's cardiovascular risk through lifestyle modification and, if necessary, medication. A high lipoprotein (a) concentration cannot be lowered with orally administered drugs; above all, patients should lower their LDL-cholesterol levels while minimizing all other risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of the concentration of cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL- and LDL-cholesterol and calculation of the non-HDL-C suffice as a guide to lipid-lowering treatment. The primary therapeutic goal is to lower LDL cholesterol.

The German CaRe high registry for familial hypercholesterolemia - Sex differences, treatment strategies, and target value attainment

Background and aims

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is among the most common genetic disorders in primary care. However, only 15% or less of patients are diagnosed, and few achieve the goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In this analysis of the German Cascade Screening and Registry for High Cholesterol (CaRe High), we examined the status of lipid management, treatment strategies, and LDL-C goal attainment according to the ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines.

Methods

We evaluated consolidated datasets from 1501 FH patients diagnosed clinically and seen either by lipid specialists or general practitioners and internists. We conducted a questionnaire survey of both the recruiting physicians and patients.

Results

Among the 1501 patients, 86% regularly received lipid-lowering drugs. LDL-C goals were achieved by 26% and 10% of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) according to the 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines, respectively. High intensity lipid-lowering was administered more often in men than in women, in patients with ASCVD, at higher LDL-C and in patients with a genetic diagnosis of FH.

Conclusions

FH is under-treated in Germany compared to guideline recommendations. Male gender, genetic proof of FH, treatment by a specialist, and presence of ASCVD appear to be associated with increased treatment intensity. Achieving the LDL-C goals of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines remains challenging if pre-treatment LDL-C is very high.

[Update lipidology : Evidence-based treatment of dyslipidemia]

The treatment of elevated plasma lipid levels plays an important role in prevention of atherosclerosis. Lowering of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol with statins and if required with additional ezetimibe, bempedoic acid and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors is of utmost importance. While lifestyle modification can strongly influence the cardiovascular risk, it only plays a minor role in lowering LDL cholesterol values. The overall (absolute) cardiovascular risk determines if and in what intensity lipid-lowering treatment should be implemented. Based on new results from interventional studies the LDL cholesterol target values have been reduced in recent years. Thus, in patients with a very high risk (for example patients with established atherosclerotic disease) an LDL cholesterol level of < 55 mg/dl (< 1.4 mmol/l, conversion mg/dl×0.02586=mmol/l) and at least a 50% reduction from baseline should be strived for. With respect to elevated triglyceride levels, either alone or simultaneously with elevated LDL cholesterol levels, the treatment goals are less clearly defined, despite the fact that elevated triglyceride levels are causally linked to atherosclerotic events. Lifestyle modifications can significantly reduce triglyceride levels and are often more effective than specific triglyceride-lowering medications, such as fibrates and omega‑3 fatty acids. New lipid-lowering drugs for the treatment of patients with severely elevated triglyceride levels and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are being developed but their clinical benefits still have to be confirmed in endpoint studies.

Effects of age on non-communicable disease risk factors among Nepalese adults

The growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and an increase in the prevalence of the underlying risk factors are creating a challenge to health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Nepal, deaths attributable to NCDs have been increasing, as has life expectancy. This poses questions with regards to how age and various risk factors interact in affecting NCDs. We analyzed the effects of age on NCD risk factors, using data from the Nepalese STEPs survey 2019, a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Six sociodemographic determinants, four behavioral risk factors, and four biological risk factors were examined. Age effects were analyzed among three age groups: below 35 years (young), 35-59 years (middle aged) and 60 years and above (elderly). The prevalence of selected behavioral risk factors for NCDs, notably smoking, alcohol consumption and insufficient physical activity, and some biological risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia) increases with age. The prevalence of most behavioral risk factors was highest among men and women aged 60 years and above. The prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia was highest among the elderly, but the prevalence of diabetes and overweight/obesity was highest among the middle aged for both sexes. Age interactions in the association between behaviors and biological risk factors were surprisingly weak. However, age interactions were significant in the association between alcohol consumption and -hypertension, -overweight/obesity and -hyperlipidemia among women. While the prevalence of NCD risk factors tends to be higher among elders, the interaction between age and risk factors is complex. Most NCD risk factors are related to behaviors, which originate in young adulthood. It is necessary to diagnose and treat biological risk factors, in younger age groups before they manifest as NCDs. Similarly, behavior change interventions need to target these younger age groups to reduce the risk of NCDs later in life.

Frequent questions and responses on the 2022 lipoprotein(a) consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options.

2023 Update on European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Statement on Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: new treatments and clinical guidance

This 2023 statement updates clinical guidance for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH), explains the genetic complexity, and provides pragmatic recommendations to address inequities in HoFH care worldwide. Key strengths include updated criteria for the clinical diagnosis of HoFH and the recommendation to prioritize phenotypic features over genotype. Thus, a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >10 mmol/L (>400 mg/dL) is suggestive of HoFH and warrants further evaluation. The statement also provides state-of-the art discussion and guidance to clinicians for interpreting the results of genetic testing and for family planning and pregnancy. Therapeutic decisions are based on the LDL-C level. Combination LDL-C-lowering therapy-both pharmacologic intervention and lipoprotein apheresis (LA)-is foundational. Addition of novel, efficacious therapies (i.e. inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, followed by evinacumab and/or lomitapide) offers potential to attain LDL-C goal or reduce the need for LA. To improve HoFH care around the world, the statement recommends the creation of national screening programmes, education to improve awareness, and management guidelines that account for the local realities of care, including access to specialist centres, treatments, and cost. This updated statement provides guidance that is crucial to early diagnosis, better care, and improved cardiovascular health for patients with HoFH worldwide.

Two years of pegvaliase in Germany:Experiences and best practice recommendations

BACKGROUND

In 2019, pegvaliase was approved in Europe for the treatment of phenylketonuria (PKU) in patients aged 16 years and older with blood phenylalanine (Phe) concentrations above 600 μmol/L despite prior management with available treatment options. Since its European approval, German metabolic centres have gained valuable experience, which may be of benefit to other treatment centres managing patients on pegvaliase.

METHODS

After a virtual meeting that was attended by nine German physicians, three German dietitians and one American physician, a follow-up discussion was held via an online platform to develop a set of recommendations on the use of pegvaliase in Germany. Eight German physicians contributed to the follow-up discussion and subsequent consensus voting, using a modified Delphi technique. The recommendations were supported by literature and retrospectively collected patient data.

RESULTS

Consensus (≥75% agreement) was achieved on 25 recommendations, covering seven topics deemed relevant by the expert panel when considering pegvaliase an option for the treatment of patients with PKU. In addition to the recommendations, a retrospective chart review was conducted in seven of the centres and included 71 patients who initiated treatment with pegvaliase. Twenty-seven patients had been treated for at least 24 months and 23 (85.2%) had achieved blood Phe ≤600 μmol/L with some degree of diet normalisation. Of these patients, 14 had physiological blood Phe on a normalised diet.

CONCLUSION

The practical consensus recommendations provide guidance on the different steps along the pegvaliase journey from clinical site requirements to treatment goals and outcomes. The recommendations are intended to support less experienced European metabolic centres with the implementation of pegvaliase, emphasising that a core treatment team consisting of at least a dietitian and metabolic physician is sufficient to initiate pegvaliase and support patients during their treatment journey.

Phytosterols and Cardiovascular Risk Evaluated against the Background of Phytosterolemia Cases-A German Expert Panel Statement

Phytosterols (PSs) have been proposed as dietary means to lower plasma LDL-C. However, concerns are raised that PSs may exert atherogenic effects, which would offset this benefit. Phytosterolemia was thought to mimic increased plasma PSs observed after the consumption of PS-enriched foods. This expert statement examines the possibility of specific atherogenicity of PSs based on sterol metabolism, experimental, animal, and human data. Observational studies show no evidence that plasma PS concentrations would be associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis or cardiovascular (CV) events. Since variants of the ABCG5/8 transporter affect the absorption of cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterols, Mendelian randomization studies examining the effects of ABCG5/8 polymorphisms cannot support or refute the potential atherogenic effects of PSs due to pleiotropy. In homozygous patients with phytosterolemia, total PS concentrations are ~4000% higher than under physiological conditions. The prevalence of atherosclerosis in these individuals is variable and may mainly relate to concomitant elevated LDL-C. Consuming PS-enriched foods increases PS concentrations by ~35%. Hence, PSs, on a molar basis, would need to have 20-40 times higher atherogenicity than cholesterol to offset their cholesterol reduction benefit. Based on their LDL-C lowering and absence of adverse safety signals, PSs offer a dietary approach to cholesterol management. However, their clinical benefits have not been established in long-term CV endpoint studies.

Hypercholesterolemia diagnosis, treatment patterns and target achievement in patients with acute coronary syndromes in Germany

BACKGROUND

Patients who experience an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of further cardiovascular events. Long-term treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hyperlipidemia, is critical to prevent progression of coronary heart disease. However, many patients do not reach recommended target levels for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, despite receiving lipid-lowering therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To obtain an insight into the current treatment situation for very high-risk patients after an initial ACS in Germany.

METHODS

The multicenter HYDRA-ACS registry study was initiated to document the clinical characteristics of very high-risk patients with ACS and hyperlipidemia in clinical practice. In addition, lipid profiles, lipid-lowering therapy, and lipid target achievement during treatment were documented over 1 year.

RESULTS

353 patients who were documented had a mean age of 57.3 years, mean body mass index was 28.6 kg/m², and 73.4% were male; 52.4% had a family history of myocardial infarction (MI) and 32.6% a family history of coronary heart disease (CHD). Patients' medical histories commonly included CHD (32.9%), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 25.5%), and previous ACS (23.0%). Common comorbidities included hypertension (68.6%), diabetes (17.3%), heart failure (16.7%), and stable angina pectoris (15.9%). The proportion of patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy increased from 65.7% at baseline to 100% at the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.0001). Substantial increases in use were seen for statins (85.0% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.0002) and cholesterol resorption inhibitors (32.9% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.0003). Use of combination therapy increased. The proportion of patients undertaking physical exercise increased (p < 0.0001), as did consumption of fruit and vegetables (p = 0.0222) and fish (p = 0.0162), while alcohol consumption decreased (p = 0.0019). Median LDL cholesterol level decreased significantly from baseline (87 vs. 166 mg/dL, p < 0.0001), and the proportion of patients with a level < 70 mg/dL increased (50.0% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001). Median HDL cholesterol increased (47 vs. 45 mg/dL, p = 0.0235) and median triglyceride level decreased (119 vs. 148 mg/dL, p = 0.0080). The proportion of patients receiving antihypertensive drugs and platelet aggregation inhibitors increased. The most frequent cardiovascular events during the 12-month follow-up were PCI (25.9%) and cardiac catheterization without PCI (12.9%); MI occurred in 2.4% of patients; no deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a contemporary picture of the treatment of hyperlipidemia after ACS in patients in Germany. Despite treatment with lipid-lowering therapy, many patients did not achieve recommended lipid targets by 12 months after an ACS event.

Estimating Prevalence and Characteristics of Statin Intolerance among High and Very High Cardiovascular Risk Patients in Germany (2017 to 2020)

Statin intolerance (SI) (partial and absolute) could lead to suboptimal lipid management. The lack of a widely accepted definition of SI results into poor understanding of patient profiles and characteristics. This study aims to estimate SI and better understand patient characteristics, as reflected in clinical practice in Germany using supervised machine learning (ML) techniques. This retrospective cohort study utilized patient records from an outpatient setting in Germany in the IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer. Patients with a high cardiovascular risk, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, or hypercholesterolemia, and those on lipid-lowering therapies between 2017 and 2020 were included, and categorized as having “absolute” or “partial” SI. ML techniques were applied to calibrate prevalence estimates, derived from different rules and levels of confidence (high and low). The study included 292,603 patients, 6.4% and 2.8% had with high confidence absolute and partial SI, respectively. After deploying ML, SI prevalence increased approximately by 27% and 57% (p < 0.00001) in absolute and partial SI, respectively, eliciting a maximum estimate of 12.5% SI with high confidence. The use of advanced analytics to provide a complementary perspective to current prevalence estimates may inform the identification, optimal treatment, and pragmatic, patient-centered management of SI in Germany.

Apheresis: What Should a Clinician Know?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Apheresis is a treatment option for severe dyslipidemia which has been introduced approximately 40 years ago to clinical practice. This article reviews recent apheresis research progresses, including apheresis for elevated LDL-cholesterol and elevated lipoprotein(a).

RECENT FINDINGS

While the role of apheresis in treating more common forms of LDL-hypercholesterolemia has been reduced due to the development of new, very potent LDL-lowering drugs, it still plays an important role in treating patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and patients with severe lipoprotein(a) elevation. One apheresis session can decrease LDL-cholesterol, apoB, and lipoprotein(a) by approximately 65%, which results in a time averaged reduction of 30-50%. Although time-consuming, and expensive regular apheresis is very well tolerated and has been proven safe for decades. Apheresis remains a treatment option for severe dyslipidemia, especially in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a), if other forms of therapy fail to achieve targets.

Estimating prevalence and characteristics of statin intolerance among high and very high cardiovascular risk patients in Germany between 2017–2020

Background

Statins remain the backbone of lipid management. Nevertheless, the degree to which statins can be used and dosed in clinical practice remains a great challenge, also due to statin intolerance (SI). The lack of widely accepted SI definition leads to poor understanding of the condition and SI patient profile

Purpose

To estimate the current SI prevalence and understand better the patient characteristics, using machine learning techniques

Methods

Retrospective cohort study, based on representative sample of electronic patient records from outpatient setting in Germany. Patients were included if they had high CV risk, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or hypercholesterolemia (HC), between 2017 and 2020. Patients were categorized as having “absolute” (history of SI events and permanent statin discontinuation) or “partial” (history of SI events while treated with statins) SI. Machine learning techniques were utilized to calibrate the prevalence estimates and to identify patient clusters. Estimates of SI prevalence were derived based on different rules and confidence levels (high, moderate and low). The low confidence estimates contain the most uncertainty in identifying SI

Results

The study population consisted of 292,603 patients (57.3% aged &gt;70 years; 55.6% male). Of these, ∼24% had high CV risk, ∼56% had ASCVD, and ∼20% had HC. After deploying machine learning, the SI identification improved by ∼27% in absolute SI and by ∼57% in partial SI patients, resulting in a maximum estimate of 12.5% SI with high/moderate confidence and further 11.8% with low confidence (absolute SI 15.8%, partial SI 8.5%). The low confidence group may contain patients with insufficient statin treatment due to reasons other than SI (e.g. clinical inertia). Statistically significant risk factors for SI were hypothyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, liver and chronic kidney disease. Cramps, muscle spasms, myalgia and myopathy were the most common statin associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) observed in the SI population. Atorvastatin 40mg was the most frequently down-titrated statin, while simvastatin to atorvastatin was the most predominant class switch in SI patients. Machine learning techniques applied on high confidence SI patients characteristics and the most commonly observed cluster for patients over 60 years showed predominant musculoskeletal disorders, concomitant high SAMS incidence and high use of multiple statins. In males under 60 years, depression and somatoform disorders along with musculoskeletal disorders, pain, and gastric events were common, while females under 60 years had predominant depressive episodes, along with musculoskeletal, mental, and metabolic disorders

Conclusion

Addressing the complexity in defining SI using advanced analytics, this study provides prevalence estimates and describes distinct patients clusters that may inform diagnosis and optimal treatment pathways for SI patients in Germany

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH

Health sector readiness for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases: A multi-method qualitative assessment in Nepal

In Nepal, deaths attributable to NCDs have increased in recent years. Although NCDs constitute a major public health problem, how best to address this has not received much attention. The objective of this study was to assess the readiness of the Nepalese health sector for the prevention and control of NCDs and their risk factors. The study followed a multi-method qualitative approach, using a review of policy documents, focus group discussions (FGDs), and in-depth interviews (IDIs) conducted between August and December 2020. The policy review was performed across four policy categories. FGDs were undertaken with different cadres of health workers and IDIs with policy makers, program managers and service providers. We performed content analysis using the WHO health system building blocks framework as the main categories. Policy documents were concerned with the growing NCD burden, but neglect the control of risk factors. FGDs and IDIs reveal significant perceived weaknesses in each of the six building blocks. According to study participants, existing services were focused on curative rather than preventive interventions. Poor retention of all health workers in rural locations, and of skilled health workers in urban locations led to the health workers across all levels being overburdened. Inadequate quantity and quality of health commodities for NCDs emerged as an important logistics issue. Monitoring and reporting for NCDs and their risk factors was found to be largely absent. Program decisions regarding NCDs did not use the available evidence. The limited budget dedicated to NCDs is being allocated to curative services. The engagement of non-health sectors with the prevention and control of NCDs remained largely neglected. There is a need to redirect health sector priorities towards NCD risk factors, notably to promote healthy diets and physical activity and to limit tobacco and alcohol consumption, at policy as well as community levels.

[Triglycerides - assessment as risk factor and therapeutic goals]

Elevated triglycerides and their lipidological consequences (small, dense LDL, residual particles (remnants), reduced HDL cholesterol) are an important and independent cardiovascular risk factor. Particularly in diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia is regarded as the main cause of high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; very high triglyceride levels can cause acute pancreatitis. This article provides an overview of the current scientific status of the pathogenesis and clinical significance of hypertriglyceridemia.

Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement

This 2022 European Atherosclerosis Society lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consensus statement updates evidence for the role of Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis, provides clinical guidance for testing and treating elevated Lp(a) levels, and considers its inclusion in global risk estimation. Epidemiologic and genetic studies involving hundreds of thousands of individuals strongly support a causal and continuous association between Lp(a) concentration and cardiovascular outcomes in different ethnicities; elevated Lp(a) is a risk factor even at very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. High Lp(a) is associated with both microcalcification and macrocalcification of the aortic valve. Current findings do not support Lp(a) as a risk factor for venous thrombotic events and impaired fibrinolysis. Very low Lp(a) levels may associate with increased risk of diabetes mellitus meriting further study. Lp(a) has pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic properties, which may partly relate to the oxidized phospholipids carried by Lp(a). This panel recommends testing Lp(a) concentration at least once in adults; cascade testing has potential value in familial hypercholesterolaemia, or with family or personal history of (very) high Lp(a) or premature ASCVD. Without specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies, early intensive risk factor management is recommended, targeted according to global cardiovascular risk and Lp(a) level. Lipoprotein apheresis is an option for very high Lp(a) with progressive cardiovascular disease despite optimal management of risk factors. In conclusion, this statement reinforces evidence for Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes. Trials of specific Lp(a)-lowering treatments are critical to confirm clinical benefit for cardiovascular disease and aortic valve stenosis.

Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy Outcomes: Results from a Multicentric Study in Tajikistan

The prevalence of gestational diabetes parallels the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, these data are not available for many parts of the world. We assessed the prevalence of gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes in Tajikistan. This cohort study included 2438 consecutively recruited representative pregnant women from 8 locations in two cities in Tajikistan, in whom an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g, fasting, 1 h, 2 h) was performed during gestational weeks 24-28. Women with known diabetes and twin pregnancies were excluded. Associations between glucose tolerance test results and pregnancy outcomes were examined. According to the WHO 2013 thresholds, 32.4% of women qualified as having gestational diabetes, the vast majority (29.7%) based on an elevated fasting glucose level (5.1-5.6 mmol/L), while only 2.8% had elevated 1- or 2-hour values or met more than one threshold. Women with only elevated fasting glucose (impaired gestational fasting glycemia) had no evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, while those with elevated 1- and/or 2-hour values (impaired gestational glucose tolerance) had more pregnancy complications (infection of urinary tract 1.8 vs. 8.8% p<0.001; preeclampsia 0.7 vs. 10.3% p<0.001) and emergency cesarean sections (4.4 vs. 13.2% p=0.002). Neonates from pregnancies with impaired gestational glucose tolerance had lower APGARs, lower birth weights, lower 30 min glucose levels, and a lower probability of being discharged alive (all p<0.05). In conclusion, the formal prevalence of gestational diabetes is high in Tajikistan; however, this does not translate into adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with impaired gestational fasting glycemia.

Hypercholesterolemia Diagnosis, Treatment Patterns, and 12-Month Target Achievement in Clinical Practice in Germany in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a highly prevalent disorder and a risk factor for early coronary artery disease. The objective of this registry was to document the clinical characteristics of patients with definite FH in Germany and to document lipid profiles, lipid-lowering therapy, and lipid target achievement during longitudinal follow-up. Methods: HYDRA-FH was a national, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional registry conducted in 35 centers in Germany. Consecutive adult patients with definite FH were included (n = 241). Results: In the cross-sectional analysis (n = 233), lipid-lowering therapy involved statins (82.0%), ezetimibe (31.8%), and PCSK9 antibodies (18.5%); 11.2% of patients were receiving no lipid-lowering drugs. Median lipid levels were: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 134 mg/dL (3.5 mmol/L), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) 48 mg/dL (1.2 mmol/L), triglycerides 160 mg/dL (1.9 mmol/L), total cholesterol 211 mg/dL (5.5 mmol/L). Values were above the normal threshold (150 mg/dL) for LDL-C in 72.9%, total cholesterol in 29.7%, and triglycerides in 45.0% of patients. After the 12-month follow-up (n = 145), only 17.2% had LDL-C < 70 mg/dL, and 20.7% had either LDL-C < 70 mg/dL or a reduction of ≥50% versus baseline. Conclusion: This study provides insight into the clinical characteristics and current treatment status of patients with FH in Germany. Many patients with FH do not achieve recommended lipid levels.

Effect of PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab on lipoprotein subfractions in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (type III hyperlipidemia)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FDBL) is a rare inborn lipid disorder characterized by the formation of abnormal triglyceride- and cholesterol-rich lipoproteins (remnant particles). Patients with FDBL have a high risk for atherosclerotic disease. The effect of PCSK9 inhibition on lipoproteins and its subfractions has not been evaluated in FDBL.

METHODS

Three patients (65±7 years, 23±3 kg/m2, 2 females) with FDBL (diagnosed by isoelectrofocusing) and atherosclerosis (coronary and/or cerebro-vascular and/or peripheral arterial disease) resistant or intolerant to statin and fibrate therapy received evolocumab (140mg every 14 days). In addition to a fasting lipid profile (preparative ultracentrifugation), apoB and cholesterol concentrations were determined in 15 lipoprotein-subfractions (density gradient ultracentrifugation; d 1.006-1.21g/ml) before and after 12 weeks of evolocumab treatment. Patients with LDL-hypercholesterolemia (n = 8, 56±8 years, 31±7 kg/m2) and mixed hyperlipidemia (n = 5, 68±12 years, 30±1 kg/m2) also receiving evolocumab for 12 weeks were used for comparison.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated PCSK9 inhibition well. PCSK9 inhibitors reduced cholesterol (29-37%), non-HDL-cholesterol (36-50%) and apoB (40-52%) in all patient groups including FDBL. In FDBL, PCSK9 inhibition reduced VLDL-cholesterol and the concentration of apoB containing lipoproteins throughout the whole density spectrum (VLDL, IDL, remnants, LDL). Lipoprotein(a) was decreased in all patient groups to a similar extent.

CONCLUSIONS

This indicates that the dominant fraction of apoB-containing lipoproteins is reduced with PCSK9 inhibition, i.e. LDL in hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemia, and cholesterol-rich VLDL, remnants and LDL in FDBL. PCSK9 inhibition may be a treatment option in patients with FDBL resistant or intolerant to statin and/or fibrate therapy.

Differentiating EPA from EPA/DHA in cardiovascular risk reduction

None of the clinical trials of omega-3 fatty acids using combinations of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) were able to show any effect on cardiovascular outcomes, despite reductions in triglyceride levels. In contrast, the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT), which employed high-dose (4 g) purified EPA, demonstrated a 25% reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-related events compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.83; P < 0.001). Moreover, REDUCE-IT is the first clinical trial using a lipid-lowering agent as adjuvant therapy to a statin to show a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality. Significant reductions in stroke, need for revascularization, and myocardial infarction were also observed. The pharmacology of EPA is distinct from that of DHA, with a differential effect on membrane structure, lipoprotein oxidation, and the production of downstream metabolites that promote the resolution of inflammation. Attained plasma levels of EPA may be an important determinant of efficacy, with a substudy of REDUCE-IT suggesting that the threshold for clinical benefit of EPA is approximately 100 μg/mL, a level achieved in only a minority of patients in other studies. No similar clinical trials of DHA monotherapy have been conducted, so no such threshold has been established. The results of the REDUCE-IT and the Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS) together affirm the efficacy of EPA therapy for cardiovascular disease risk reduction in certain patient populations.

New targets for treating hypertriglyceridemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Elevated fasting and postprandial plasma triglyceride concentrations are associated with an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients on and off low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

This association is not mediated by triglycerides directly. Other components of triglyceride rich lipoproteins, such as cholesterol and apolipoproteins B and -CIII can directly induce and enhance atherosclerosis. In addition, an elevated concentration of triglyceride rich lipoproteins affects the concentration, composition, function, and metabolism of LDL and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), which contributes to the risk. Especially in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-cholesterol (encompassing cholesterol of all atherogenic lipoproteins) predict risk better than LDL-cholesterol and/or triglycerides. Therefore, current guidelines have stated secondary goals relating to non-HDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (in addition to the primary goal relating to LDL-cholesterol). These secondary goals can be achieved by further reducing LDL-cholesterol or by decreasing triglyceride rich lipoproteins. However, only further LDL reduction has so far proven to be beneficial in outcome trials. In addition, high dose eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) can reduce atherosclerotic cardio-vascular disease risk in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, although benefit is not (or not only) related to apolipoprotein B or non-HDL-cholesterol reduction.

SUMMARY

Non-HDL-cholesterol and apoB represent novel targets for patients with hypertriglyceridemia, but achieving LDL-cholesterol targets remains the first step for cardio-vascular risk reduction.

Reducing residual cardiovascular risk in Europe: Therapeutic implications of European medicines agency approval of icosapent ethyl/eicosapentaenoic acid

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and its atherothrombotic complications impose a substantial disease burden in Europe, representing a cost of €210 billion per year for the European Union. Hypertriglyceridemia, a major risk factor for premature ASCVD, is present in more than 20% of the European population, and is a key feature of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Recent findings from the Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA) cohort in Spain showed that even in apparently healthy, middle-aged individuals without a history of cardiovascular (CV) risk, elevated triglyceride levels are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and arterial inflammation. Emerging evidence from epidemiologic and genetic studies supports an independent causative role of triglycerides, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and their remnants in this pathology. Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a highly purified, stable ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) that was initially approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat severe hypertriglyceridemia, and subsequently received an expanded indication to reduce the risk of CV events in adult statin-treated patients. Approval was based on the pivotal, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT), which showed that high-dose IPE (4 g/day) significantly reduced the risk of primary and secondary composite endpoints comprising major CV events and CV death relative to placebo. In 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved IPE to reduce the risk of CV events in adult statin-treated patients at high CV risk with elevated triglyceride levels (≥1.7 mmol/L [≥150 mg/dL]) and established CV disease, or diabetes and at least one other CV risk factor. Clinical studies in Europe, which included patients with acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, and those undergoing cardiac rehabilitation, established that 12.5% to 23.3% of these high-risk populations may benefit from treatment with IPE. Such clinical benefit may in part result from the moderate triglyceride-lowering properties of IPE/EPA; equally however, concentrations of atherogenic remnant particle-cholesterol are markedly reduced. Furthermore, IPE/EPA exerts pleiotropic actions beyond its lipid-lowering properties, which include modulation of endothelial function, attenuation of intra-plaque inflammation and oxidative stress, and reduction in macrophage accumulation. Plasma phospholipids, into which EPA is primarily incorporated and transported, appear to serve as precursors for a series of anti-inflammatory metabolites involving the resolvins RvE1 to RvE3, a pathway which may confer cardioprotective benefits. In addition, plaque imaging data from the Effect of Icosapent Ethyl on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Elevated Triglycerides on Statin Therapy (EVAPORATE) and the Combination Therapy of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Pitavastatin for Coronary Plaque Regression Evaluated by Integrated Backscatter Intravascular Ultrasonography (CHERRY) trials show that plaque stabilization may be favorably affected. These factors may act synergistically to stabilize atherosclerotic plaques and reduce CV risk. In addition to robust efficacy data, multiple cost-utility studies across several countries indicate that IPE/EPA is a cost-effective treatment option that is favorably situated relative to some common willingness-to-pay thresholds. This review will evaluate the relevance of hypertriglyceridemia to residual ASCVD burden in statin-treated dyslipidemic patients, the potential of IPE/EPA to reduce the risk of ASCVD and cardiovascular mortality in high-risk patient populations, and the mechanisms which may underlie these effects. Finally, the clinical implications of the EMA label for IPE will be critically appraised in light of the updated 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines on the management of dyslipidemia and the recent European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants, together with considerations of its cost-effectiveness across several countries.

Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Neurodegeneration in Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Deficiency

In phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) deficiency, an easily feasible method to access the progression of neurodegeneration is warranted to contribute to current discussions on treatment indications and targets. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures as markers of neurodegeneration differ between patients with PAH deficiency and healthy controls (HCs) according to phenotype and metabolic control. In this single-center cross-sectional study, 92 patients with different phenotypes of PAH deficiency [PAH deficiency not requiring treatment, early treated phenylketonuria (ETPKU), and late-diagnosed phenylketonuria (PKU)] compared with 76 HCs were examined using spectral-domain OCT. Indices of phenylalanine elevation and variability were correlated with OCT parameters. Late-diagnosed PKU patients showed reduced peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness and combined ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) volume. Adult ETPKU patients were found to have lower GCIPL volume (p = 0.016), which correlated with the indices of phenylalanine control. In pediatric ETPKU patients with poor metabolic control, pRNFL was significantly reduced (p = 0.004). Patients with PAH deficiency not requiring treatment did not exhibit retinal degeneration. Inner nuclear layer (INL) was significantly increased in the pediatric ETPKU patients, driven by those with current poor metabolic control (p = 0.006). Our data provide evidence of retinal neuroaxonal degeneration and INL swelling, depending on the phenotype, current age, and metabolic control. These findings suggest that OCT is suitable to investigate neurodegeneration in PKU and we propose OCT as a sensitive, reliable, safe, low-burden, and low-cost examination for future multicenter studies.

Oral Lipid-Lowering Treatments Beyond Statins: Too Old and Outdated or Still Useful?

Purpose of Review

For many years, the lipid-lowering armamentarium consisted of statins and/or ezetimibe and/or bile acid sequestrants and/or fibrates. Now, with the availability of new drugs mostly injectables, the field has changed and the role of oral non-statin drugs (including bempedoic acid) must be reevaluated.

Recent Findings

Ezetimibe remains a very important combination partner for statins with continuously increasing treatment numbers. Bempedoic acid is another interesting combination partner for statin/ezetimibe or ezetimibe alone but lacks in contrast to ezetimibe evidence from outcome trials. The role of fibrates is less clear as they have shown disappointing results in outcome trials but may still be used in selected, high-risk patients with combined dyslipidemia. Bile acid sequestrants are now rarely used as there are stronger, better tolerable ways to lower LDL-cholesterol.

Summary

With the introduction of new injectable lipid-lowering drugs, some oral drugs such as ezetimibe and bempedoic acid still have an important spot in our treatment algorithm others such as fibrates have a less clear role while again others are now rarely used.

Novel insights into the management of German patients with very high cardiovascular risk eligible for PCSK9 inhibitor treatment: baseline characteristics from the PERI-DYS study

Background

The reasons why patients are treated or not with PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are incompletely understood. In Germany, access to PCSK9i is limited by local regulations and many high-risk cardiovascular patients do not receive these therapies. The PERI-DYS study aims to describe and compare two groups of dyslipidaemia patients at very high CV risk: those treated with PCSK9i compared with patients qualifying for but not treated with PCSK9i.

Methods

Observational study with up to 2000 consented patients, documented mainly by office-based cardiologists or physicians in lipid ambulances with data extracted from patient charts. Lipid lowering treatment (LLT) at enrolment includes ongoing PCSK9i use, newly initiated PCSK9i, statins, ezetimibe, and lipoprotein apheresis. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, with visits every 6±2 months to record LLT (drugs, dosing), other CV medications, lipid and glucose values, blood pressure, clinical events (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events) and adverse drug reactions.

Results

As of 05 March 2021, 1488 patients have been enrolled across 70 sites. The majority of patients (91.5%) had heterozygous familial or non-familial hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. At enrolment, 49.4% of patients were receiving PCSK9i (35.4% ongoing and 14.0% newly treated). Among PCSK9i users, the majority were receiving evolocumab 140 mg (n=567, 38.1% of all enrolled patients). There were no major differences in demographics and non-lipid lowering medication, with the exception of more females in the PCSK9i group.

The estimated untreated LDL-C based on “back-calculation” was higher in patients who were on ongoing PCSK9i therapy than in those not on PCSK9i or newly treated with PCSK9i (Table 1). Physician-reported statin intolerance was much more common in the two PCSK9i groups compared with the non-PCSK9i group (67% versus 14%). Patients in the PCSK9i groups received fewer concomitant statins. Mean on-treatment total cholesterol and LDL-C were considerably lower in patients who were on ongoing PCSK9i compared to non-PCSK9i. Overall, nicotinic acid, fibrates, cholestagel, and omega-3 fatty acids were rarely used (data not shown).

Conclusions

Patients treated with PCSK9i and those qualifying for but not treated with PCSK9i had similar baseline characteristics, but the former had higher estimated untreated LDL-C values and a higher rate of statin intolerance. Ongoing follow-up will determine the prognostic importance of these findings.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen GmbH Germany