1
|
Goldberg NM, Roscoe EM, Newman ZA, Sedano AJ. Single- vs. combined-category preference assessments for edible, leisure, and social-interaction stimuli. J Appl Behav Anal 2023; 56:787-803. [PMID: 37470250 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.1007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
A concern when conducting combined-category preference assessments is the potential for displacement effects, a shift in the preference ranking from highly preferred to moderately or less preferred for stimuli in two of three stimulus categories (e.g., edible, leisure, or social-interaction). In this study, we evaluated potential displacement effects in combined-category arrays of edible, leisure, and social-interaction stimuli for five individuals with autism. First, single-category paired-stimulus preference assessments were implemented to identify two highly preferred stimuli from each category. When these stimuli were included in a combined-category preference assessment, displacement effects were observed for three of five participants. During a subsequent reinforcer assessment, stimuli identified as less preferred in the combined-category preference assessment functioned as reinforcers for two participants. Additionally, although social interaction was not identified as highly preferred for three of the five participants, it functioned as a reinforcer for four participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Goldberg
- New England Center for Children, Southborough, MA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Eileen M Roscoe
- New England Center for Children, Southborough, MA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Zoe A Newman
- New England Center for Children, Southborough, MA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Angelica J Sedano
- New England Center for Children, Southborough, MA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Conine DE, Guerrero LA, Jones-Thomas E, Frampton SE, Vollmer TR, Smith-Bonahue T. Verbal Behavior Analysis of Teaching Story Recall to Children with Autism: A Replication and Extension. Anal Verbal Behav 2023; 39:118-145. [PMID: 37397137 PMCID: PMC10313610 DOI: 10.1007/s40616-023-00183-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may struggle with verbal behavior related to recall in various contexts. However, relatively little research has evaluated methods for improving recall among this population, and even fewer from a verbal behavior perspective. One socially important set of skills that relies upon a behavioral repertoire of recall is applied reading skills, such as reading comprehension and story recall. Valentino et al. (2015) designed an intervention package to teach children with ASD to recall short stories and conceptualized the behavior as an intraverbal chain. The present study replicated and extended that study with three school-aged children with ASD using a multiple baseline design across stories. For some participants and some stories, story recall was mastered under less intensive intervention conditions than in the previous study. When it was necessary to implement the full intervention package, the effects largely replicated previous research. Improvements in recall were correlated with increases in correct answers to comprehension questions. These data have important implications for clinicians and educators providing reading and recall interventions to children with ASD. Results also have theoretical implications for verbal behavior accounts of memory and recall, and suggest several possible avenues for future research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40616-023-00183-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E. Conine
- Department of Learning Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA
- College of Education & Human Development, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3980, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
| | | | | | - Sarah E. Frampton
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoffmann AN, Paskins RT, Brady‐Ruehs AM, Sellers TP. An examination of stimulus technology level and preference displacement during multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessments. BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS 2023. [DOI: 10.1002/bin.1937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey N. Hoffmann
- Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling Utah State University Logan Utah USA
| | - Ryan T. Paskins
- Department of Rehabilitation and Counseling Assumption University Worcester USA
| | - Anna M. Brady‐Ruehs
- Department of Special and Early Education Northern Illinois University DeKalb Illinois USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graber A, Graber J. Applied Behavior Analysis and the Abolitionist Neurodiversity Critique: An Ethical Analysis. Behav Anal Pract 2023:1-17. [PMID: 37363652 PMCID: PMC9979895 DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00780-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The behavior analytic literature on neurodiversity remains limited. This article aims to begin filling the lacuna. We will introduce the neurodiversity perspective and demonstrate an important congruence between the behavior analytic and neurodiversity perspectives on autism. Despite this congruence, applied behavior analysis is often targeted for criticism by proponents of the neurodiversity perspective. A central concern raises questions about the aims of behavior analytic interventions for clients with autism. Is it appropriate to teach clients with autism to behave as if they were neurotypical? Concerns about the aims of behavior analytic interventions mirror concerns that have been raised about the aims of language education in schools. Drawing on the literature regarding linguistically diverse classrooms, we will critically evaluate the abolitionist neurodiversity critique of ABA. We conclude by considering both concrete and theoretical implications for the ethics of behavior analytic work with autistic clients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Graber
- Division of Bioethics, Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, Nisonger Center Affiliate Faculty, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Jessica Graber
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Center for Autism Spectrum Disorders, Columbus, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Associations between Leisure Preferences, Mindfulness, Psychological Capital, and Life Satisfaction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19074121. [PMID: 35409804 PMCID: PMC8998282 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
This study intended to explore which leisure preferences contribute to mindfulness, psychological capital, and life satisfaction and assess whether mindfulness, psychological capital, and life satisfaction are associated with different leisure preferences. This study applied the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-12), the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), and the instrument to evaluate the prevalence of leisure preferences. A sample consisted of 586 participants, 104 males and 478 females. The mean age of participants was 42.06, SD = 13.29. The results show that respondents who did not spend free time watching television scored higher on life satisfaction, mindfulness, and psychological capital. Participants who preferred attending events scored higher on life satisfaction and psychological capital. Participants who preferred spending time with family as a leisure preference scored significantly higher on life satisfaction, mindfulness, and psychological capital, including PsyCap overall, PsyCap work, PsyCap relationship, and PsyCap health. The findings also reveal that time spent with family is significantly associated with life satisfaction. Besides, males’ life satisfaction was significantly associated with time spent in nature, while females’ satisfaction was associated with spending time with family and participating in events. Males’ mindfulness was significantly associated with book reading, and females’ mindfulness was associated with not watching television. Males’ psychological capital was significantly associated with spending time with family and book reading, and females’ psychological capital was associated with not watching television but spending time with family, participating in events, and spending time in nature. The findings also showed that mindfulness mediated the link between watching television and life satisfaction, and psychological capital mediated links between spending time with family, participating in events, and life satisfaction. The findings demonstrate that life satisfaction is also significantly associated with spending time with family as a leisure preference. This study also revealed a significant negative association between age and spending time with friends or family, evidencing the possible loneliness of elderly respondents. Due to limitations of this study, including sample size and characteristics, cultural context, and research design, the research findings would preferably be regarded thoughtfully.
Collapse
|
6
|
Rooker GW, Hagopian LP, Haddock JN, Arevalo AR, Bonner AC, Dillon CM. Analysis of unexpected disruptive effects of contingent food reinforcement on automatically maintained self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal 2022; 55:62-79. [PMID: 34449082 PMCID: PMC8758530 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Research has identified treatment-responsive and treatment-resistant subtypes of automatically maintained self-injurious behavior (ASIB) based on patterns of responding in the functional analysis (FA) reflecting its sensitivity to disruption by alternative reinforcement, and the presence of self-restraint. Rooker et al. (2019) unexpectedly observed reductions in treatment-resistant self-injury while participants performed an operant task. The current study further examined this in nine participants with treatment-resistant ASIB in an example of discovery-based research. An operant task engendering high rates of responding (switch-pressing) to produce food, reduced self-injury across all participants, and eliminated self-injury for some participants under certain schedules. Although this finding must be replicated and evaluated over longer time periods, it provides some evidence that alternative reinforcement can disrupt self-injury in these treatment-resistant subtypes under some conditions. Reinforcer and response competition are discussed as possible mechanisms underlying these disruptive effects, as are the potential implications of these findings regarding treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Griffin W. Rooker
- Department of Behavioral Psychology Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore, MD
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD
| | - Louis P. Hagopian
- Department of Behavioral Psychology Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore, MD
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer N. Haddock
- Department of Behavioral Psychology Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Christopher M. Dillon
- Department of Behavioral Psychology Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore, MD
- Department of Psychology University of Maryland Baltimore County
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kanaman NA, Hubbs AL, Dozier CL, Jones BA, Foley E, Brandt JA. Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items. J Appl Behav Anal 2021; 55:430-450. [PMID: 34958457 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
A variable that may influence the outcomes of stimulus preference assessments (SPAs) is whether social interaction is provided during the stimulus access period. In Experiment 1, we compared the outcomes of a Solitary paired stimulus preference assessment (PSPA) (toys only), Social PSPA (toys plus social interaction), and Combined PSPA (toys alone and toys plus social interaction) to determine whether the addition of social interaction influenced preference for toys in preschool children. In Experiment 2, we conducted a concurrent-operant reinforcer assessment to compare the reinforcing efficacy of stimuli with and without social interaction. Experiment 1 showed preference for toys was stable across assessments (Solitary and Social PSPAs) and most participants preferred toys plus social interaction when compared in a single assessment (Combined PSPA). Experiment 2 showed that results of the Combined PSPA in Experiment 1 predicted the outcome of most participants' reinforcer assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amber L Hubbs
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas
| | | | - Brooke A Jones
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas
| | - Elizabeth Foley
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Conine DE, Morris SL, Kronfli FR, Slanzi CM, Petronelli AK, Kalick L, Vollmer TR. Comparing the results of one-session, two-session, and three-session MSWO preference assessments. J Appl Behav Anal 2021; 54:700-712. [PMID: 33465255 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) preference assessment is commonly used in behavior-analytic research and practice. As originally published, the MSWO included 5 sessions in an effort to confirm stimulus preferences. Subsequent researchers have evaluated the validity of MSWO outcomes when the assessment is abbreviated. Generally, valid outcomes have been noted for 3-session MSWOs (that is, the outcomes match those of the 5-session version), while validity outcomes for 1- or 2-session MSWOs have varied across studies. The current study utilized data from 157 MSWO preference assessments conducted in previously published research with 49 total participants and analyzed the extent to which 1-session or 2-session variations of those assessments would have yielded similar outcomes as a 3-session assessment. Results indicate that the hierarchies produced by both abbreviated formats were strongly correlated with those produced by a 3-session assessment. However, neither 1- nor 2-session MSWOs reliably identified the same highest-preferred stimuli as a 3-session MSWO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Faris R Kronfli
- Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
White AN, Melanson IJ, Sipila‐Thomas ES, Brodhead MT. A methodological review of preference displacement research. BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/bin.1758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Allison N. White
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
| | - Isaac J. Melanson
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
| | - Emma S. Sipila‐Thomas
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
| | - Matthew T. Brodhead
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sipila-Thomas ES, Foote AJ, White AN, Melanson IJ, Brodhead MT. A replication of preference displacement research in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Appl Behav Anal 2020; 54:403-416. [PMID: 32989755 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to replicate previous research on preference displacement with edible and leisure stimuli. In the present study, the experimenters evaluated preference displacement in 25 children with autism spectrum disorder using combined multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessments that consisted of highly preferred edible and leisure stimuli. In addition, the experimenters used a block randomization procedure to evaluate if assessment order influenced displacement outcomes. The experimenters observed patterns of complete displacement by edible stimuli for four participants and complete displacement by leisure stimuli for two participants; assessment order did not influence outcomes. The results and implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma S Sipila-Thomas
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University
| | - Alexa J Foote
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University
| | - Allison N White
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University
| | - Isaac J Melanson
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University
| | - Matthew T Brodhead
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Conine DE, Vollmer TR, Barlow MA, Grauerholz-Fisher E, Dela Rosa CM, Petronelli AK. Assessment and treatment of response to name for children with autism spectrum disorder: Toward an efficient intervention model. J Appl Behav Anal 2020; 53:2024-2052. [PMID: 32578223 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Response to name (RTN) is an early developmental milestone, deficits in which are associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study extends previous research by evaluating an assessment and treatment model for RTN with 13 children with ASD. For all participants, phase 1 was a naturalistic social baseline. The 9 children who did not meet mastery criteria in phase 1 underwent a series of treatment conditions in phase 2. In phase 3, treatment components were removed, and generalization was assessed. Results indicated that tangible reinforcement procedures can produce rapid increases in discriminated RTN, sometimes without prompts. The total number of trials to mastery were reduced in the current study relative to previous research. Results also provide preliminary evidence to suggest that the phase 1 baseline condition may produce distinct patterns of RTN that could be used to predict treatment effects and further reduce trials to mastery in future work.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gaucher M, Forget J. Temporal regulation of children with autism spectrum disorder exposed to a differential-reinforcement-of low-rates schedule. J Exp Anal Behav 2020; 113:515-529. [PMID: 32201952 DOI: 10.1002/jeab.592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated temporal adjustment of children with autism spectrum disorder under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rates (DRL) schedule. Sixteen participants, aged 3.2 to 7 years, were exposed to two conditions, DRL 5 s and DRL 20 s. Children participated in 7 sessions in each condition, except for 1 participant who attained the adjustment criteria in the DRL 5-s schedule. Temporal adjustment was measured with the proportion of reinforced interresponse times (IRTs) and the mean IRT. The operant response was a press on a touch screen and the reinforcers were cartoons. IQ and receptive language were measured prior to the DRL sessions. Results showed that the mean proportion of reinforced IRTs was slightly higher in the DRL 5-s schedule. The mean IRT was above the IRT requirement in both conditions. However, substantial individual variability was observed. Children with higher IQ and receptive language scores presented a greater proportion of reinforced IRTs in both conditions. Moreover, participants who adjusted their responses to the DRL 5-s schedule were more likely to adjust responding to the DRL 20-s schedule. This suggests that some children might be more sensitive to reinforcement contingencies than others. This study points at future research in the field of timing in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélissa Gaucher
- Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal,
| | - Jacques Forget
- Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lucock ZR, Sharp RA, Jones RS. Preference for leisure items over edible items in individuals with dementia: A replication. J Appl Behav Anal 2020; 53:1780-1788. [PMID: 31957021 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
We replicated previous research in which adults with dementia tended to show a preference for leisure items over edible items when presented in the same array. Additionally, we conducted engagement analyses with the highest, middle, and lowest preference leisure items to determine whether relative preference corresponded to engagement in the natural environment. The most highly preferred stimulus for 6 out of 7 participants was a leisure item, and for each of those six the top 3 preferred stimuli were leisure stimuli. For 4 participants, the most preferred stimulus also produced the longest duration of engagement. We discuss the issues we encountered when conducting preference assessments with adults with intact vocal verbal repertoires, and suggest potential explanations for the displacement of edibles by leisure stimuli in older adults with dementia.
Collapse
|
14
|
Slanzi CM, Graziano M, D'Angelo G, Vollmer TR, Conine DE. Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism: A replication in Italy. J Appl Behav Anal 2019; 53:2429-2439. [PMID: 31835275 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Several studies have found that edible items tend to displace leisure items in multiple-stimulus preference assessments for individuals with developmental disabilities. One recent study (Conine & Vollmer, 2019) included screen-based technology devices in assessments and found that food items were less likely to displace leisure items and in some cases leisure items totally displaced edible items. The purpose of our study was to conduct a replication of Conine and Vollmer in Italy to evaluate cultural differences in food and leisure preferences. Results of our study were similar: For 44% of participants, at least one leisure item ranked above all edible items and leisure items displaced all edible items for 28% of participants. Participants in the present study showed a higher preference for leisure items or toys that were not screen-based technology devices, suggesting there may be cultural variation in the types of leisure items that are preferred.
Collapse
|
15
|
Conine DE, Vollmer TR, Bolívar HA. Response to name in children with autism: Treatment, generalization, and maintenance. J Appl Behav Anal 2019; 53:744-766. [PMID: 31486075 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Deficits in response to name (RTN) are an early indicator of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and RTN is a treatment goal in many early intervention curricula for children with ASD. However, little research has empirically evaluated methods for increasing RTN in children with ASD. We evaluated a series of conditions designed to increase RTN for 4 children with ASD using a multielement experimental design. The schedules of tangible reinforcement were thinned after mastery and generalization was tested across people and contexts. Tangible reinforcers were necessary to increase RTN for all 4 participants, and the schedule of reinforcement was successfully thinned with all participants after intervention. Generalization was also observed across people and experimental contexts.
Collapse
|
16
|
Carter AB, Zonneveld KLM. A comparison of displacement and reinforcer potency for typically developing children. J Appl Behav Anal 2019; 53:1130-1144. [PMID: 31486076 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Previous researchers found that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities tend to prefer edible over leisure stimuli, although leisure stimuli may still function as reinforcers. We replicated and extended previous research in a 2-part experiment with typically developing children. In Experiment 1, we evaluated 15 children's preference for leisure and edible stimuli. Five of 15 participants preferred edible over leisure stimuli, 3 of 15 participants preferred leisure over edible stimuli, and the remaining 7 of 15 participants did not show a preference for a stimulus class. In Experiment 2, we compared the reinforcer potency of the top-ranked stimulus from each class with 7 of the 8 participants who showed displacement of one stimulus class. Four of 7 participants allocated more responding to the task associated with the top-ranked stimulus and 3 of 7 participants showed no differences in responding to the task regardless of the stimulus rank.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kronfli FR, Vollmer TR, Fernand JK, Bolívar HA. Evaluating preference for and reinforcing efficacy of fruits and vegetables compared with salty and sweet foods. J Appl Behav Anal 2019; 53:385-401. [PMID: 31219188 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder are often more selective in their food preferences than their typically developing peers. Additionally, many preferred food selections have minimal nutritional value. We evaluated the preference for, and reinforcing efficacy of, fruits and vegetables compared with salty and sweet foods, which are often used as edible reinforcers. Multiple-stimulus preference assessments were conducted to identify preferred foods, and reinforcer assessments were conducted to determine the reinforcing efficacy of more preferred foods. Fruits and vegetables were sometimes preferred over salty or sweet foods and often functioned as reinforcers. Future research should incorporate fruits and vegetables into preference assessments when identifying putative reinforcers.
Collapse
|