Interventions associated with implementation of a pharmacist-led neurology pharmacotherapy clinic in an ambulatory care setting

Benefit of clinical pharmacists in neurology clinics at an academic medical center

BACKGROUND

Patients with neurologic diseases have complex medical needs and may benefit from the addition of clinical pharmacists in their care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe integration and benefit of clinical pharmacists in neuroimmunology and neuromuscular clinics at an academic medical center.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review evaluated patients initiated on a neurology medication for a neuroimmunology or neuromuscular disease state before and after pharmacist integration in neurology clinics. The primary outcome measured access to an initially prescribed neuroimmunology or neuromuscular medication within 90 days of prescription. Secondary outcomes included access to an initially prescribed or alternative neurology medication owing to insurance requirements within 90 days, time from initial prescription to start, and description of pharmacist involvement.

RESULTS

There were 101 patients in the pregroup and 101 patients in the postgroup. The percentage of patients with confirmed initially prescribed medication access at 90 days increased in the postgroup compared with the pregroup (87.1% vs. 72.5%, respectively, P = 0.014). For secondary outcomes, the percentage of patients who started on an initially prescribed or alternative neuroimmunology or neuromuscular medication within 90 days also increased in the postgroup compared with the pregroup (90.0% vs. 73.3%, respectively, P = 0.004). Additional pharmacist involvement occurred in 64 patients (63.4%) in the postgroup and included prior authorization approval assistance, drug information support, and medication liaison interventions, with an average of 4.7 pharmacist interventions at each pharmacy-led encounter.

CONCLUSION

The addition of pharmacists into neuroimmunology and neuromuscular clinics improved operational access to medications for neuroimmunology and neuromuscular conditions. In addition, pharmacists were able to assist with multiple areas of patient care including medication education, monitoring, and serving as a medication liaison. This study supports continuing to offer clinical pharmacy services in neuroimmunology and neuromuscular departments and may support the addition of clinical pharmacists into neurology services at other institutions.

Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy for older patients at specialist outpatient clinics: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy is associated with negative clinical consequences. The efficacy of deprescribing interventions within medical specialist outpatient clinics remains unclear. Here, we reviewed the research on the effectiveness of deprescribing interventions implemented within specialist outpatient clinics for patients ≥ 60 years.

METHODS

Systematic searches of key databases were undertaken for studies published between January 1990 and October 2021. The diverse nature of the study designs made it unsuitable for pooling for meta-analysis, thus, a narrative review was conducted and presented in both text and tabular formats. The primary outcome for review was that intervention resulted in a change in medication load (either total number of medications or appropriateness of medication). Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of deprescription and clinical benefits. Methodological quality of the publications was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with a total of 10,914 participants were included for review. These included geriatric outpatient clinics, oncology/hematology clinics, hemodialysis clinics, and designated polypharmacy/multimorbidity clinics. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported statistically significant reductions in medication load with intervention; however, all studies had a high risk of bias. The inclusion of a pharmacist in outpatient clinics aims to increase deprescribing, however, the current evidence is mainly restricted to prospective and pilot studies. The data on secondary outcomes were very limited and highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Specialist outpatient clinics may provide valuable settings for implementing deprescribing interventions. The addition of a multidisciplinary team including a pharmacist and the use of validated medication assessment tools appear to be enablers. Further research is warranted.

Evaluation of the impact of a clinical pharmacist on a specialty neurology clinic's adherence to recommended laboratory test monitoring

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists can have a significant effect on the specialty ambulatory care setting. Specialty medications are potentially high risk and may require frequent laboratory test monitoring to assess for therapy-associated adverse effects. Pharmacists may work under collaborative drug therapy management agreements that allow for the ordering and assessment of recommended laboratory tests in order to optimize safe and effective medication use. The impact of pharmacists on clinic adherence to recommended laboratory test monitoring has yet to be described in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of a specialty clinical pharmacist on neurology clinic adherence to manufacturer-recommended laboratory test monitoring. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review at a single academic medical center for the period between July 1, 2014, and April 30, 2020, comparing laboratory test monitoring adherence before (prepharmacist) and after (post-pharmacist) incorporation of a pharmacist into a neurology clinic. Patients were included if they lived in the Tri-County Area of Charleston, South Carolina, and received a prescription for dalfampridine, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, teriflunomide, or cannabidiol that was prescribed by a neurology clinic provider at the Medical University of South Carolina. Chart review was conducted to assess clinic adherence with manufacturer-recommended laboratory test monitoring. Laboratory test monitoring was considered adherent if obtained within 6 months before or on the date of prescription order. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables, and adherence rates were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: For dalfampridine, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and teriflunomide, there were 123 patients and 78 patients in the pre- and post-pharmacist groups, respectively. There were 51 patients in the cannabidiol group. Clinic adherence to laboratory test monitoring improved in the post-pharmacist group for every monitoring point, with statistically significant improvement in "hepatic function tests every 6-9 months" (P = 0.005), "CBC every 6-9 months" (P = 0.01), and "VZV IgG titer at baseline" (P = 0.005) for patients taking fingolimod. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated improved adherence to manufacturer-recommended laboratory test monitoring after a specialty clinical pharmacist was incorporated into a multidisciplinary neurology clinic. DISCLOSURES: No funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Implementation of an older adult epilepsy clinic utilizing pharmacist services

BACKGROUND

Antiseizure medications are commonly associated with adverse effects including behavioral and cognitive issues, drug interactions, idiosyncratic reactions, and long-term complications, which can lead to non-adherence. At the same time, there are limited reports describing multidisciplinary models of epilepsy care that include pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacist services in an epilepsy clinic for older adults and document the patient care delivered using this design.

PRACTICE DESCRIPTION

A subspecialty older adult epilepsy clinic, embedded within a neurology clinic, in an urban academic medical center.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

Integration of pharmacy services to document medication history, provide medication reconciliation, identify medication-related problems, and make interventions.

EVALUATION METHODS

Data were retrospectively evaluated for the patients seen by the pharmacist and epilepsy team between July 2019 and January 2021. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients with a total of 94 encounters (70.7% of all specialty clinic visits) were seen collaboratively by the physician and the pharmacist. The majority of patients were African American (87.9%), aged 63.7 ± 8.2 years, and more frequently male (58.6%), and a high proportion had some baseline memory loss or diagnosis of dementia (53.4%). Medication reconciliation occurred in 94 (100%) encounters. More than half the encounters required reconciliation to the existing medication list by adding medication (55.3 % of encounters) or deleting mediations (53.2% of encounters). Presence of adverse effects was the most common medication-related problem identified (23.4%). Resolutions to the medication-related problems were also reported.

CONCLUSION

The population of older adults with epilepsy is expected to increase in prevalence. Pharmacists are able to impact medication-related problems in a vulnerable, high-risk patient population. The multidisciplinary model we describe here can be used as a template to provide care in ambulatory care practices involving other neurology specialties with a high proportion of older adult patients.

Community pharmacists' role in caring for people living with epilepsy: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe studies about pharmacist-provided services for people with epilepsy and their caregivers.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles that were: (1) written in English, (2) published in 1985 or later, (3) a peer-reviewed empirical study or practice report, and (4) describing an intervention provided by a pharmacist for people with epilepsy and/or their caregivers in an outpatient pharmacy setting. The abstracts and full text, when necessary, were reviewed by two investigators to assess eligibility. Data were extracted from each article by two investigators using a standardized abstraction form based on the Pharmacist Patient Care Services Intervention Reporting (PaCIR) checklist. Data elements of interest included components of service, mode of service delivery, frequency, number and duration of sessions for the service, roles and responsibilities of the community pharmacist, type of community pharmacy, outcomes and measures evaluated along with data sources, and findings and results. Risk of bias was not assessed due to the descriptive nature of the review.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included, seven of which reported services conducted in the United States. The most common service reported was medication management (n = 7) followed by education and counseling (n = 4). One article described a care coordination documentation tool that could be used by pharmacists and physicians in epilepsy care. Most interventions were evaluated using observational designs (n = 5) or did not have an evaluation component (n = 4).

SIGNIFICANCE

This review provides examples of community pharmacists providing care to people living with epilepsy that extend beyond dispensing medications. Findings demonstrate that there is little published evidence on community pharmacists' contributions to epilepsy care and suggest opportunities for further exploration and innovation. This review serves as the first step in a project that seeks to develop a stakeholder-driven community pharmacist integrated population health intervention for people living with epilepsy.

The art and science of drug titration

A “one-size-fits-all” approach has been the standard for drug dosing, in particular for agents with a wide therapeutic index. The scientific principles of drug titration, most commonly used for medications with a narrow therapeutic index, are to give the patient adequate and effective treatment, at the lowest dose possible, with the aim of minimizing unnecessary medication use and side effects. The art of drug titration involves the interplay of scientific drug titration principles with the clinical expertise of the healthcare provider, and an individualized, patient-centered partnership between the provider and the patient to review the delicate balance of perceived benefits and risks from both perspectives. Drug titration may occur as up-, down-, or cross-titration depending on whether the goal is to reach or maintain a therapeutic outcome, decrease the risk of adverse effects, or prevent withdrawal/discontinuation syndromes or recurrence of disease. Drug titration introduces additional complexities surrounding the conduct of clinical trials and real-world studies, confounding our understanding of the true effect of medications. In clinical practice, wide variations in titration schedules may exist due to a lack of evidence and consensus on titration approaches that achieve an optimal benefit-harm profile. Further, drug titration may be challenging for patients to follow, resulting in suboptimal adherence and may require increased healthcare-related visits and coordination of care amongst providers. Despite the challenges associated with drug titration, it is a personalized approach to drug dosing that blends science with art, and with supportive real-world outcomes-based evidence, can be effective for optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes and improving drug safety.

Impact of pharmacists on outcomes for patients with psychiatric or neurologic disorders

INTRODUCTION

Psychiatric and neurologic illnesses are highly prevalent and are often suboptimally treated. A 2015 review highlighted the value of psychiatric pharmacists in improving medication-related outcomes. There is a need to describe areas of expansion and strengthened evidence regarding pharmacist practice and patient care impact in psychiatric and neurologic settings since 2015.

METHODS

A systematic search of literature published from January 2014 to June 2019 was conducted. Publications describing patient-level outcome results associated with pharmacist provision of care in a psychiatric/neurologic setting and/or in relation to central nervous system (CNS) medications were included.

RESULTS

A total of 64 publications were included. There was significant heterogeneity of published study methods and data, prohibiting meta-analysis. Pharmacists practicing across a wide variety of health care settings with focus on CNS medication management significantly improved patient-level outcomes, such as medication adherence, disease control, and avoidance of hospitalization. The most common practice approach associated with significant improvement in patient-level outcomes was incorporation of psychiatric pharmacist input into the interprofessional health care team.

DISCUSSION

Pharmacists who focus on psychiatric and neurologic disease improve outcomes for patients with these conditions. This is important in the current health care environment as most patients with psychiatric or neurologic conditions continue to have unmet needs. Additional studies designed to measure pharmacists' impact on patient-level outcomes are encouraged to strengthen these findings.