Comparison of intravenous and intramuscular neridronate regimens for the treatment of Paget disease of bone

Differential effects of alendronate on chondrocytes, cartilage matrix and subchondral bone structure in surgically induced osteoarthritis in mice

Bisphosphonates (BP) are considered a treatment option for osteoarthritis (OA) due to reduction of OA-induced microtrauma in the bone marrow, stabilization of subchondral bone (SB) layer and pain reduction. The effects of high-dose alendronate (ALN) treatment on SB and articular cartilage after destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) or Sham surgery of male C57Bl/6J mice were analyzed. We performed serum analysis; histology and immunohistochemistry to assess the severity of OA and a possible pain symptomatology. Subsequently, the ratio of bone volume to total volume (BV/TV), epiphyseal trabecular morphology and the bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by nanoCT. Serum analysis revealed a reduction of ADAMTS5 level. The histological evaluation displayed no protective effect of ALN-treatment on cartilage erosion. NanoCT-analysis of the medial epiphysis revealed an increase of BV/TV in ALN-treated mice. Only the DMM group had significantly higher SB volume accompanied by decreased subchondral bone surface. Furthermore Nano-CT analysis revealed an increase in trabecular density and number, a decreased BMD and reduced osteophyte formation in the ALN mice. ALN treatment affected bone micro-architecture by reducing osteophytosis with simultaneous increasing subchondral bone plate thickness, trabecular thickness and BMD. Accordingly, ALN cannot be considered as a potential treatment strategy in general, however in a subgroup of patients with high bone turnover in an early-stage of OA, ALN might be an option when applied during a restricted time frame.

Diagnosis and treatment of Paget's disease of bone: position paper from the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism and Skeletal Diseases (SIOMMMS)

INTRODUCTION

Paget's disease of bone is a focal skeletal disorder causing bone deformities and impairing bone quality. Despite the prevalence of asymptomatic cases is increasing, the progression of the disease can lead to invalidating complications that compromise the quality of life. Doubts on clinical and therapeutic management aspects exist, although beneficial effects of antiresorptive drugs, particularly bisphosphonates are known. However, limited information is available from randomized controlled trials on the prevention of disease complications so that somewhat contrasting positions about treatment indications between expert panels from the main scientific societies of metabolic bone diseases exist. This task force, composed by expert representatives appointed by the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism and Skeletal Diseases and members of the Italian Association of Paget's disease of bone, felt the necessity for more specific and up to date indications for an early diagnosis and clinical management.

METHODS

Through selected key questions, we propose evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. In the lack of good evidence to support clear recommendations, available information from the literature together with expert opinion of the panel was used to provide suggestions for the clinical practice.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Description of the evidence quality and support of the strength of the statements was provided on each of the selected key questions. The diagnosis of PDB should be mainly based on symptoms and the typical biochemical and radiological features. While treatment is mandatory to all the symptomatic cases at diagnosis, less evidence is available on treatment indications in asymptomatic as well as in previously treated patients in the presence of biochemical recurrence. However, given the safety and long-term efficacy of potent intravenous bisphosphonates such as zoledronate, a suggestion to treat most if not all cases at the time of diagnosis was released.

Paget Disease of Bone Harboring Bone Metastatic Neuroendocrine Cancer: A Case Report

In this case report, we describe an uncommon case of neuroendocrine cancer of unknown origin began with cauda equina syndrome in a patient affected by Paget disease of bone (PDB). A 76-year-old man with diagnosis of PDB, without history of pain or bone deformity, developed sudden severe low back pain. Bone alkaline phosphatase was increased and MRI and whole-body scintigraphy confirmed the localization of the disease at the third vertebra of the lumbar spine. Treatment with Neridronic Acid was started, but after only 2 weeks of therapy anuria and bowel occlusion occurred together with lower limb weakness and walking impairment. Cauda equina syndrome consequent to spinal stenosis at the level of L2-L3 was diagnosed after admission to Emergency Department and the patient underwent neurosurgery for spinal medulla decompression. The histologic results showed a complete subversion of bone structure in neoplastic tissue, consistent with metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown origin. In conclusion, low back pain in the elderly may require deep investigation to individuate rare diseases. In asymptomatic patients with apparently stable PDB, the sudden appearance of pain or neurologic symptoms may alert the clinician for the possibility of other superimposing diseases, like bone metastases.

Aminobisphosphonates reactivate the latent reservoir in people living with HIV-1

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is not curative due to the existence of cellular reservoirs of latent HIV-1 that persist during therapy. Current research efforts to cure HIV-1 infection include "shock and kill" strategies to disrupt latency using small molecules or latency-reversing agents (LRAs) to induce expression of HIV-1 enabling cytotoxic immune cells to eliminate infected cells. The modest success of current LRAs urges the field to identify novel drugs with increased clinical efficacy. Aminobisphosphonates (N-BPs) that include pamidronate, zoledronate, or alendronate, are the first-line treatment of bone-related diseases including osteoporosis and bone malignancies. Here, we show the use of N-BPs as a novel class of LRA: we found in ex vivo assays using primary cells from ART-suppressed people living with HIV-1 that N-BPs induce HIV-1 from latency to levels that are comparable to the T cell activator phytohemagglutinin (PHA). RNA sequencing and mechanistic data suggested that reactivation may occur through activation of the activator protein 1 signaling pathway. Stored samples from a prior clinical trial aimed at analyzing the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density, provided further evidence of alendronate-mediated latency reversal and activation of immune effector cells. Decay of the reservoir measured by IPDA was however not detected. Our results demonstrate the novel use of N-BPs to reverse HIV-1 latency while inducing immune effector functions. This preliminary evidence merits further investigation in a controlled clinical setting possibly in combination with therapeutic vaccination.

Drug treatment strategies for Paget's disease: relieving pain and preventing progression

INTRODUCTION

Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is a focal bone disorder caused by a marked dysregulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in basic multicellular units, leading to abnormal and disorganized deposition of collagen fibers (the so-called "woven bone"). Therefore, pagetic bones are increased in size, and at increased risk for bone pain, deformities, fractures, osteoarthritis, and, more rarely, neoplastic degeneration.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we revise the available information concerning the pharmacological treatment of PDB.

EXPERT OPINION

PDB progresses slowly within the affected skeletal sites and, if untreated, often leads to bone overgrowth, with bone pain, deformity and a likely increased risk of complications. Thus, the primary goal of treatment is the restoration of a normal bone turnover, in order to relieve bone pain or other symptoms and possibly prevent the complications. PDB long remained a poorly treatable disorder until the discovery of antiresorptive agents such as calcitonin first and bisphosphonates (BPs) later. With the recent development of potent intravenous BPs like zoledronate, allowing a better control of disease activity over the long term with a single infusion, has contributed to a marked improvement of the clinical management of this invalidating disorder.

Aminobisphosphonates reactivate the latent reservoir in people living with HIV-1

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is not curative due to the existence of cellular reservoirs of latent HIV-1 that persist during therapy. Current research efforts to cure HIV-1 infection include "shock and kill" strategies to disrupt latency using small molecules or latency-reversing agents (LRAs) to induce expression of HIV-1 enabling cytotoxic immune cells to eliminate infected cells. The modest success of current LRAs urges the field to identify novel drugs with increased clinical efficacy. Aminobisphosphonates (N-BPs) that include pamidronate, zoledronate, or alendronate, are the first-line treatment of bone-related diseases including osteoporosis and bone malignancies. Here, we show the use of N-BPs as a novel class of LRA: we found in ex vivo assays using primary cells from ART-suppressed people living with HIV-1 that N-BPs induce HIV-1 from latency to levels that are comparable to the T cell activator phytohemagglutinin (PHA). RNA sequencing and mechanistic data suggested that reactivation may occur through activation of the activator protein 1 signaling pathway. Stored samples from a prior clinical trial aimed at analyzing the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density, provided further evidence of alendronate-mediated latency reversal and activation of immune effector cells. Decay of the reservoir measured by IPDA was however not detected. Our results demonstrate the novel use of N-BPs to reverse HIV-1 latency while inducing immune effector functions. This preliminary evidence merits further investigation in a controlled clinical setting possibly in combination with therapeutic vaccination.

Role of the Endocannabinoid/Endovanilloid System in the Modulation of Osteoclast Activity in Paget's Disease of Bone

The role of the endocannabinoid/endovanilloid (EC/EV) system in bone metabolism has recently received attention. Current literature evidences the modulation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts through the activation or inhibition of cannabinoid receptors in various pathological conditions with secondary involvement of bone tissue. However, this role is still unclear in primary bone diseases. Paget's disease of the bone (PDB) could be considered a disease model for analyzing the role of the EC/EV system on osteoclasts (OCs), speculating the potential use of specific agents targeting this system for managing metabolic bone disorders. The aim of the study is to analyze OCs expression of EC/EV system in patients with PDB and to compare OCs activity between this population and healthy people. Finally, we investigate whether specific agents targeting EC/EV systems are able to modulate OCs activity in this metabolic bone disorder. We found a significant increase in cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) protein expression in patients with PDB, compared to healthy controls. Moreover, we found a significant reduction in multi-nucleated tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive OCs and resorption areas after treatment with JWH-133. CB2 could be a molecular target for reducing the activity of OCs in PDB, opening new therapeutic scenarios for the management of this condition.

Intramuscular neridronate for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Background:

Complex regional pain syndrome type-1 (CRPS-1) is a severely disabling painful disease challenging to treat. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial examined the efficacy of intramuscular (i.m.) neridronate in CRPS-1 patients.

Methods:

A total of 78 patients diagnosed with CRPS-1 (aged 59.5 ± 10.3, 66.7% female) were randomly assigned to 25 mg (i.m.) neridronate (N = 41) given once daily for 16 consecutive days or placebo control (N = 37). Efficacy was assessed after 30 days using a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and the number of patients achieving ⩾50% reduction in VAS score. Change in clinical signs and symptoms, quality of life (QoL) using Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire were also assessed.

Results:

After 30 days, VAS score decreased significantly to a greater extent in neridronate-treated patients versus placebo (31.9 ± 23.3 mm versus 52.3 ± 27.8 mm, p = 0.0003). Furthermore, the proportion of patients achieving a VAS reduction of ⩾50% was greater in the neridronate group (65.9% versus 29.7%, p = 0.0017). Clinical signs and symptoms were improved significantly in the neridronate group versus placebo for edema (72.5% versus 79.9%, p = 0.03), pain during motion (70% versus 83.3%, p = 0.0009), allodynia (20% versus 63.3%, p = 0.0004), and hyperalgesia (20% versus 56.7%, p = 0.0023). Whereas no difference was observed for QoL measures using the SF-36 questionnaire, three of the four pain variables using the McGill Pain Questionnaire improved significantly in the neridronate group. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported during the study.

Conclusion:

In patients with acute CRPS-1, i.m. injections of 25 mg neridronate were associated with clinically relevant benefit compared with placebo controls.

Trial registration:

EU Clinical Trials Register: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2014-001156-28

Effect of neridronate in osteopenic patients after heart, liver or lung transplant: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Transplantation (Tx) is an effective therapeutic option in patients with end-stage organ failure and osteoporosis and related fractures are a recognized complication in these patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of neridronate in patients with reduced bone mass after Tx of the heart, liver or lung.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial (RCT), 22 patients were treated with neridronate (25 mg i.m./month) and 17 received placebo. All patients received daily oral calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months and markers of bone turnover at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (11 heart Tx, 21 liver Tx, 7 lung Tx), aged 49.3±9.1 years, with a T-score <-2.0 SD at lumbar spine or femoral level were included. In neridronate-treated patients, a significant increase in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) was observed after 12 months vs. placebo control (0.92±0.13 g/cm² vs. 0.84±0.08 g/cm²; P=0.005). Femur and hip BMD remained unchanged between groups. Total alkaline phosphatase, bone alkaline phosphatase and beta-cross-laps significantly decreased over the 12 months in neridronate-treated patients vs. placebo, respectively (107.4±74 U/L vs. 157.6±107.1 U/L, P=0.002; 5.7±3.3 µg/L vs. 11.7±4.3 µg/L, P<0.001 and 0.25±0.13 ng/mL vs. 0.73±0.57 ng/mL, P<0.001). No difference was observed between neridronate and placebo groups regarding safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first RCT that demonstrates the efficacy of neridronate in increasing bone density and reducing bone turnover in organ Tx recipients with significant skeletal morbidity.

Bisphosphonates in the management of Paget's disease

The first clinical use of bisphosphonates was in Paget's disease of bone (PDB) when disodium etidronate was found to be effective at suppressing metabolic activity of the disease. Subsequently, PDB became a testing ground for many bisphosphonates using changes in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as the primary outcome measure in clinical trials. Bisphosphonates are now considered to be the treatment of choice for PDB since they are highly effective at suppressing the elevations in bone turnover that are characteristic of the disease. Short term studies have shown that treatment with alendronate and risedronate can promote formation of lamellar bone in affected sites and improve x-ray appearances in some patients. Bisphosphonates have also been shown to improve bone pain in PDB and within the bisphosphonates, zoledronic acid (ZA) is most likely to give a favourable pain response. Many patients with PDB do not have pain however, even when there is increased metabolic activity and more research is needed to find out why this is the case. The effects of bisphosphonates on complications of PDB such as deformity, pathological fractures and deafness have not been adequately studied since most clinical trials have been short term and have not collected information on these important outcomes. The PRISM and PRISM-EZ studies investigated the long-term effects of bisphosphonates in patients with established PDB using a treat-to-target approach and showed that intensive bisphosphonate therapy aimed at normalising ALP was no more effective than symptom directed treatment with bisphosphonates at preventing complications of PDB. The Zoledronate in the Prevention of Paget's Disease (ZiPP) trial, which is currently in progress, seeks to determine whether early intervention with this potent bisphosphonate might be effective in preventing disease progression. Should the ZiPP study yield positive results, genetic testing coupled to prophylactic bisphosphonate therapy might represent a new indication for these highly effective inhibitors of bone resorption in future years.

Preventive Role of Vitamin D Supplementation for Acute Phase Reaction after Bisphosphonate Infusion in Paget's Disease

CONTEXT

Intravenous aminobisphosphonates (N-BPs) can induce an acute phase reaction (APR) in up to 40% to 70% of first infusions, causing discomfort and often requiring intervention with analgesics or antipyretics.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to explore the risk factors of APR in a large sample of patients with Paget's disease of bone (PDB) and to assess the possible preventive effects of vitamin D administration.

METHODS

An observational analysis was performed in 330 patients with PDB at the time of N-BP infusion. Then, an interventional study was performed in 66 patients with active, untreated PDB to evaluate if vitamin D administration (oral cholecalciferol 50 000 IU/weekly for 8 weeks before infusion) may prevent APR.

RESULTS

In a retrospective study, APR occurred in 47.6% and 18.3% of naive or previously treated patients, respectively. Its prevalence progressively increased in relation to the severity of vitamin D deficiency, reaching 80.0% in patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels below 10 ng/mL (relative risk (RR) = 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-4.7, P < .0001), even in cases previously treated with N-BPs. Moreover, APR occurred more frequently in patients who experienced a previous APR (RR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.2; P < .001) or in carriers of SQSTM1 mutation (RR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.2; P = .005). In the interventional study, vitamin D supplementation prevented APR in most cases, equivalent to a RR of 0.31 (95% CI 0.14-0.67; P < .005) with respect to prevalence rates of the observational cohort. A similar trend was observed concerning the occurrence of hypocalcemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The achievement of adequate 25OHD levels is recommended before N-BP infusion in order to minimize the risk of APR or hypocalcemia in PDB.

Neuromuscular Diseases and Bone

Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are inherited or acquired conditions affecting skeletal muscles, motor nerves, or neuromuscular junctions. Most of them are characterized by a progressive damage of muscle fibers with reduced muscle strength, disability, and poor health-related quality of life of affected patients. In this scenario, skeletal health is usually compromised as a consequence of modified bone-muscle cross-talk including biomechanical and bio-humoral issues, resulting in increased risk of bone fragility and fractures. In addition, NMD patients frequently face nutritional issues, including malnutrition due to feeding disorders and swallowing problems that might affect bone health. Moreover, in these patients, low levels of physical activity or immobility are common and might lead to overweight or obesity that can also interfere with bone strength features. Also, vitamin D deficiency could play a critical role both in the pathogenesis and in the clinical scenario of many NMDs, suggesting that its correction could be useful in maintaining or enhancing bone health, especially in the early phases of NMDs. Last but not least, specific disease-modifying drugs, available for some NMDs, are frequently burdened with adverse effects on bone tissue. For example, glucocorticoid therapy, standard of care for many muscular dystrophies, prolongs long-term survival in treated patients; nevertheless, high dose and/or chronic use of these drugs are a common cause of secondary osteoporosis. This review addresses the current state of knowledge about the factors that play a role in determining bone alterations reported in NMDs, how these factors can modify the biological pathways underlying bone health, and which are the available interventions to manage bone involvement in patients affected by NMDs. Considering the complexity of care of these patients, an interdisciplinary and multimodal management strategy based on both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is recommended, particularly targeting musculoskeletal issues that are closely related to functional independence as well as social implications.

Paget's Disease of Bone

Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is a chronic and focal bone disorder, characterized by increased osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and a subsequent compensatory increase in bone formation, resulting in a disorganized mosaic of woven and lamellar bone at one or more affected skeletal sites. As a result, bone pain, noticeable deformities, arthritis at adjacent joints, and fractures can occur. In a small proportion of cases neoplastic degeneration in osteosarcoma, or, less frequently, giant cell tumor has been also described at PDB sites. While recent epidemiological evidences clearly indicate a decrease in the prevalence and the severity of PDB, over the past 2 decades there have been consistent advances on the genetic mechanisms of disease. It is now clear that PDB is a genetically heterogeneous disorder, with mutations in at least two different genes (SQSTM1, ZNF687) and more common predisposing variants. As a counterpart to the genetic hypothesis, the focal nature of lesions, the decline in prevalence rates, and the incomplete penetrance of the disease among family members suggest that one or more environmental triggers may play a role in the pathophysiology of PDB. The exact nature of these triggers and how they might interact with the genetic factors are less understood, but recent experimental data from mice models suggest the implication of paramixoviral infections. The clinical management of PDB has also evolved considerably, with the development of potent aminobisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid which, given as a single intravenous infusion, now allows a long-term disease remission in the majority of patients.

Diagnosis and Management of Paget's Disease of Bone in Adults: A Clinical Guideline

An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of Paget's disease of bone (PDB) was developed using GRADE methodology, by a Guideline Development Group (GDG) led by the Paget's Association (UK). A systematic review of diagnostic tests and pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options was conducted that sought to address several key questions of clinical relevance. Twelve recommendations and five conditional recommendations were made, but there was insufficient evidence to address eight of the questions posed. The following recommendations were identified as the most important: 1) Radionuclide bone scans, in addition to targeted radiographs, are recommended as a means of fully and accurately defining the extent of metabolically active disease in patients with PDB. 2) Serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is recommended as a first-line biochemical screening test in combination with liver function tests in screening for the presence of metabolically active PDB. 3) Bisphosphonates are recommended for the treatment of bone pain associated with PDB. Zoledronic acid is recommended as the bisphosphonate most likely to give a favorable pain response. 4) Treatment aimed at improving symptoms is recommended over a treat-to-target strategy aimed at normalizing total ALP in PDB. 5) Total hip or knee replacements are recommended for patients with PDB who develop osteoarthritis in whom medical treatment is inadequate. There is insufficient information to recommend one type of surgical approach over another. The guideline was endorsed by the European Calcified Tissues Society, the International Osteoporosis Foundation, the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, the Bone Research Society (UK), and the British Geriatric Society. The GDG noted that there had been a lack of research on patient-focused clinical outcomes in PDB and identified several areas where further research was needed. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.

Bisphosphonates for Paget's disease of bone in adults

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are considered to be the treatment of choice for people with Paget's disease of bone. However, the effects of bisphosphonates on patient-centred outcomes have not been extensively studied. There are insufficient data to determine whether reducing and maintaining biochemical markers of bone turnover to within the normal range improves quality of life and reduces the risk of complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates for adult patients with Paget's disease of bone.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and trials registers up to March 2017. We searched regulatory agency published information for rare adverse events.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of bisphosphonates as treatment for Paget's disease in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed studies for risk of bias. We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 trials (25 reports, 3168 participants). Of these, 10 trials (801 participants) compared bisphosphonates (etidronate, tiludronate, ibandronate, pamidronate, olpadronate, alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate) versus placebo, seven compared two bisphosphonates (992 participants), one trial compared a bisphosphonates with a bisphosphonate plus calcitonin (44 participants), and two studies, the largest trial (1331 participants) and its interventional extension study (502 participants), compared symptomatic treatment and intensive treatment where the goal was to normalise alkaline phosphatase.Most studies were assessed at low or unclear risk of bias. Six of 10 studies comparing bisphosphonates versus placebo were assessed at high risk of bias, mainly around incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting.Participant populations were reasonably homogeneous in terms of age (mean age 66 to 74 years) and sex (51% to 74% male). Most studies included participants who had elevated alkaline phosphatase levels whether or not bone pain was present. Mean follow-up was six months.Bisphosphonates versus placeboBisphosphonates tripled the proportion (31% versus 9%) of participants whose bone pain disappeared (RR 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31 to 8.90; 2 studies, 205 participants; NNT 5, 95% CI 1 to 31; moderate-quality evidence). This result is clinically important. Data were consistent when pain change was measured as any reduction (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.01; 7 studies, 481 participants).There was uncertainty about differences in incident fractures: 1.4% fractures occurred in the bisphosphonates group and none in the placebo group (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.18 to 4.31; 4 studies, 356 participants; very low-quality evidence).None of the studies reported data on orthopaedic surgery, quality of life or hearing thresholds.Results regarding adverse effects and treatment discontinuation were uncertain. There was a 64% risk of mild gastrointestinal adverse events in intervention group participants and 48% in the control group (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.92; 6 studies, 376 participants; low-quality evidence). The likelihood of study participants discontinuing due to adverse effects was slightly higher in intervention group participants (4.4%) than the control group (4.1%) (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.52; 6 studies, 517 participants; low-quality evidence). Zoledronate was associated with an increased risk of transient fever or fatigue (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.44; 1 study, 176 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Bisphosphonates versus active comparatorMore participants reported pain relief with zoledronate than pamidronate (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.53; 1 study, 89 participants; NNT 5, 95% CI 3 to 11) or risedronate (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.74; 1 study, 347 participants; NNT 7, 95% CI 4 to 24; very low quality evidence). This result is clinically important.There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude differences in adverse effects of bisphosphonates (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.76; 2 studies, 437 participants; low-quality evidence) and treatment discontinuation (2 studies, 437 participants) (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.43 to 9.59; 2 studies, 437 participants; very low-quality evidence).Intensive versus symptomatic treatmentThere was no consistent evidence of difference to response in bone pain, bodily pain or quality of life in participants who received intensive versus symptomatic treatment.Inconclusive results were observed regarding fractures and orthopaedic procedures for intensive versus symptomatic treatment (intensive treatment for fracture: RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.44; absolute risk 8.1% versus 5.2%; orthopaedic procedures: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.80 to 3.11; absolute risk 5.6% versus 3.0%; 1 study, 502 participants; low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude an important difference in adverse effects between intensive and symptomatic treatment (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.41; low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude an important difference of risk of rare adverse events (including osteonecrosis of the jaw) from the regulatory agencies databases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate-quality evidence that bisphosphonates improved pain in people with Paget's disease of bone when compared with placebo. We are uncertain about the results of head-to-head studies investigating bisphosphonates. We found insufficient evidence of benefit in terms of pain or quality of life from intensive treatment. Information about adverse effects was limited, but serious side effects were rare, and rate of withdrawals due to side effects was low.

Bone pain: current and future treatments

Skeletal conditions are common causes of chronic pain and there is an unmet medical need for improved treatment options. Bone pain is currently managed with disease modifying agents and/or analgesics depending on the condition. Disease modifying agents affect the underlying pathophysiology of the disease and reduce as a secondary effect bone pain. Antiresorptive and anabolic agents, such as bisphosphonates and intermittent parathyroid hormone (1-34), respectively, have proven effective as pain relieving agents. Cathepsin K inhibitors and anti-sclerostin antibodies hold, due to their disease modifying effects, promise of a pain relieving effect. NSAIDs and opioids are widely employed in the treatment of bone pain. However, recent preclinical findings demonstrating a unique neuronal innervation of bone tissue and sprouting of sensory nerve fibers open for new treatment possibilities.

Clinical development of neridronate: potential for new applications

Neridronate is an aminobisphosphonate, licensed in Italy for the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and Paget's disease of bone (PDB). A characteristic property of neridronate is that it can be administered both intravenously and intramuscularly, providing a useful system for administration in homecare. In this review, we discuss the latest clinical results of neridronate administration in OI and PDB, as well as in osteoporosis and other conditions. We will focus in particular on the latest evidence of the effect of neridronate on treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I.

Acute phase response following intravenous zoledronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

An acute phase response (APR) is frequently observed in patients treated with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronate (ZOL). We aimed to define clinical and laboratory parameters that may predict ZOL-induced APR in women with low bone mass. Fifty-one postmenopausal women with low bone mass were given a single i.v. infusion of ZOL 5mg. APR was clinically defined by the visual analog pain scale (VAS) for the musculoskeletal symptoms and body temperature. White blood cell count (WBC), leucocyte subpopulations, C-reactive protein (CRP), parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], interleukins (IL)-1b and -6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α and interferon (IFN)γ were measured before and 48 h following the infusion. Subsequently, patients were divided into those experiencing APR (APR+) or not (APR-). WBC, granulocytes, CRP, IL-1b and IL-6 were significantly increased, whereas lymphocytes, eosinophils, calcium, phosphate and 25(OH)D decreased 48h after ZOL infusion. Twenty-eight of the 51 patients (54.9%) experienced an APR. APR+ patients were younger and had higher baseline lymphocytes compared to APR- patients. There was no difference (p=0.405) in the development of APR between treatment-naive patients (19/32, 59.4%) and patients previously treated with another oral nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (9/19, 47.4%). In conclusion, our data suggest that pre-treatment higher lymphocyte number increases the risk of APR while previous treatment with another nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate does not significantly reduce the risk. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations decrease significantly after the infusion, possibly as part of the inflammatory response to ZOL.