Ultrasound velocity, through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity

A cross-sectional survey of factors influencing bone mass in junior high school students

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate factors influencing the osteo-sono assessment index (OSI) in junior high school students (boys, girls who had reached menarche, and girls who had not).

METHODS

A total of 9,743 students (4,974 boys and 4,769 girls) in Ehime Prefecture participated in this study. We measured body mass index (BMI) and calcaneal bone mass using OSI. In parallel, participants answered a questionnaire relating to age, sex, menarche, exercise habits, milk intake, and history of bone fractures during the preceding year. To determine the factors influencing OSI, we calculated an individual standardized partial regression coefficient (β) using multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis.

RESULTS

For boys, MLR showed that BMI (β = 0.300), age (β = 0.260), current exercise habits (β = 0.106), and milk intake per day in primary school (β = 0.085) statistically significantly influenced OSI. For girls who had reached menarche, BMI (β = 0.302), current exercise habits (β = 0.237), age (β = 0.140), and bone fracture during the preceding year (β = 0.036) influenced OSI. For girls who had not reached menarche, current exercise habits (β = 0.242), BMI (β = 0.135), and age (β = 0.085) influenced OSI.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences between the factors related to OSI among boys, girls who had reached menarche, and girls who had not. BMI, exercise habits, and age were the common factors related to OSI. Particularly for girls, exercise habits had a great influence on OSI.

Imaging of metabolic bone diseases

Osteoporosis is a serious public health problem. The incidence of osteoporotic fractures increases with age. As life expectancy increases, social costs associated with osteoporotic fractures will multiply exponentially. The early diagnosis of osteoporosis, thanks to evermore precise devices, becomes, therefore, fundamental to prevent complications of disease and unnecessary suffering.

Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used in the care of patients for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis, low bone mass (osteopenia), or normal bone density; assessment of fracture risk; and monitoring changes in bone density over time. The development of other technologies for the evaluation of skeletal health has been associated with uncertainties regarding their applications in clinical practice. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), a technology for measuring properties of bone at peripheral skeletal sites, is more portable and less expensive than DXA, without the use of ionizing radiation. The proliferation of QUS devices that are technologically diverse, measuring and reporting variable bone parameters in different ways, examining different skeletal sites, and having differing levels of validating data for association with DXA-measured bone density and fracture risk, has created many challenges in applying QUS for use in clinical practice. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) 2007 Position Development Conference (PDC) addressed clinical applications of QUS for fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, treatment initiation, monitoring of treatment, and quality assurance/quality control. The ISCD Official Positions on QUS resulting from this PDC, the rationale for their establishment, and recommendations for further study are presented here.

The clinical use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the detection and management of osteoporosis

For the detection and management of osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is emerging as a relatively low-cost and readily accessible alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in certain circumstances. The following is a brief, but thorough review of the existing literature with respect to the use of QUS in 6 settings: 1) assessing fragility fracture risk; 2) diagnosing osteoporosis; 3) initiating osteoporosis treatment; 4) monitoring osteoporosis treatment; 5) osteoporosis case finding; and 6) quality assurance and control. Many QUS devices exist that are quite different with respect to the parameters they measure and the strength of empirical evidence supporting their use. In general, heel QUS appears to be most tested and most effective. Overall, some, but not all, heel QUS devices are effective assessing fracture risk in some, but not all, populations, the evidence being strongest for Caucasian females over 55 years old. Otherwise, the evidence is fair with respect to certain devices allowing for the accurate diagnosis of likelihood of osteoporosis, and generally fair to poor in terms of QUS use when initiating or monitoring osteoporosis treatment. A reasonable protocol is proposed herein for case-finding purposes, which relies on a combined assessment of clinical risk factors (CR.F) and heel QUS. Finally, several recommendations are made for quality assurance and control.

The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis

Once an initial vertebral fracture is sustained, the risk of subsequent vertebral fracture increases significantly. This phenomenon has been termed the "vertebral fracture cascade". Mechanisms underlying this fracture cascade are inadequately understood, creating uncertainty in the clinical environment regarding prevention of further fractures. The cascade cannot be explained by low bone mass alone, suggesting that factors independent of this parameter contribute to its aetiopathogenesis. This review explores physiologic properties that may help to explain the vertebral fracture cascade. Differences in bone properties, including bone mineral density and bone quality, between individuals with and those without osteoporotic vertebral fractures are discussed. Evidence suggests that non-bone parameters differ between individuals with and those without osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Spinal properties, including vertebral macroarchitecture, intervertebral disc integrity, spinal curvature and spinal loading are compared in these groups of individuals. Cross-sectional studies also indicate that neurophysiologic properties, particularly trunk control and balance, are affected by the presence of a vertebral fracture. This review provides a synthesis of the literature to highlight the multi-factorial aetiopathogenesis of the vertebral fracture cascade. With a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this clinical problem, more effective preventative strategies may be developed to offset the fracture cascade.

Quantitative ultrasound in adults with cystic fibrosis: correlation with bone mineral density and risk of vertebral fractures

In several conditions, including cystic fibrosis (CF) and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements provide a modest prediction of fracture risk. We investigated in adult CF patients whether quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters were able to discriminate between patients with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. One hundred seventy-two adults with CF, 91 men and 81 women, often on chronic oral or inhaled corticosteroid therapy, were studied. BMD at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and total body were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). QUS parameters were assessed by Achilles Express at the calcaneus and by the DBM Sonic 1200 at the phalanges. All bone measurements by DXA and QUS were significantly correlated with each other, with the exception of phalangeal amplitude-dependent speed of sound versus spine BMD. The mean T-score values in CF patients with and without prevalent vertebral fractures were similar for all DXA measurements and for stiffness index. A significant difference between the two groups was observed only for phalangeal ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI) values (relative risk = 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.49 for each decrease in T score), and this difference was maintained after adjusting the values for age, body weight, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, gender, and corticosteroid use. In conclusion, only a phalangeal QUS parameter (UBPI), in contrast with calcaneus QUS or DXA measurements, was able to discriminate CF patients with from those without vertebral fractures, possibly as a result of qualitative alterations of bone tissue independent of BMD.

Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and fractures: a meta-analysis

The relationship between bone QUS and fracture risk was estimated in a systematic review of data from 14 prospective studies of 47,300 individuals and 2350 incident fractures. In older women, low QUS values were associated with overall fracture risk, low-trauma fractures, and with hip, forearm, and humerus fractures separately.

INTRODUCTION

Bone quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has emerged as a promising technique to evaluate bone status. The aim of this study was to determine the association between measurements of QUS with the risk of fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies published between 1985 and June 2005 with a baseline measurement of QUS and subsequent follow-up for fractures was carried out. Fourteen separate study populations, consisting of about 47,300 individuals (85.4% women), with about 124,000 person-years of observation and over 2350 fractures, including 653 hip, 529 forearm, and 386 humeral fractures, were analyzed. The main outcome measure was the estimated relative risk of fracture for a decrease in bone QUS parameters of 1 SD below sex- and age-adjusted mean in women.

RESULTS

Eleven studies evaluated QUS at the heel, with patella and phalanx (two studies each) and distal radius (one study) being scarcely used. There was not significant heterogeneity among the studies included in the review. Relative risk estimates (95% CI) for overall fractures were 1.55 (1.35-1.78) for each SD decrease in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), 1.63 (1.37-1.93) for speed of sound (SOS), and 1.74 (1.39-2.17) for QUS index/stiffness index (QUI/SI). Risk estimates were similar or slightly higher for hip fractures and low-energy trauma fractures. Humeral and forearm/wrist fractures were also related with lower QUS values.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of bone QUS are significantly associated with nonspinal fracture risk in older women in a similar degree to DXA. QUS may be a valid alternative to evaluate fracture risk in situations where DXA is not accessible.

Evaluation of skeletal status by quantitative ultrasonometry in postmenopausal women without known risk factors for osteoporosis

The objective of our study was to evaluate bone density in Italian postmenopausal women without clinical risk factors for osteoporosis resident in the Naples area using quantitative ultrasonometry of bone (QUS). Subjects were 1149 Italian postmenopausal women (age: 54.9 +/- 5.0 years (mean +/- standard deviation); range: 45-74 years) resident in the Naples area. Clinical risk factors for osteoporosis resulting in exclusion from the study were family history of osteoporosis, dietary, smoking and alcohol habits, personal history of fractures and/or metabolic diseases. The following QUS parameters were calculated: amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS), T-score and Z-score. We found significant inverse correlations between AD-SoS and age (r = - 0.23), time since menopause (r = - 0.25) and body mass index (BMI) (r = - 0.16). The same was observed for T-score. In contrast, Z-score showed a significant positive correlation with age and time since menopause, and a negative correlation with BMI. A T-score suggestive of high risk for osteoporosis (less than -3.2) was found in 1.6% of subjects, while a T-score suggestive of moderate risk for osteoporosis (between -3.2 and -2) was found in 19.3% of patients. In this group of women without clinical risk factors for osteoporosis we found a very low prevalence of QUS results suggesting a high risk for osteoporosis. However, a condition of 'moderate' risk for osteoporosis was present in a remarkable percentage of these women.

Prospective identification of postmenopausal osteoporotic women at high vertebral fracture risk by radiography, bone densitometry, quantitative ultrasound, and laboratory findings: results from the PIOS study

Women with established osteoporosis are at high risk to sustain additional vertebral fractures. Treatment may affect the predictive power of bone densitometry and biochemical techniques. There are few prospective studies comparing fracture prediction by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and other techniques in treated women with established osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess the predictive power of various DXA and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques for identification of women at high risk to develop new fractures over 1-2 yr. Moreover, we wanted to investigate whether previous or ongoing therapy precluded the use of common clinical laboratory blood tests and bone turnover markers for prediction of fracture risk. We measured prevalent fracture status; bone mineral density (BMD) of the whole body, spine, and hip by DXA; QUS of the calcaneus and the patella; hormones and various markers of bone resorption and formation; and took standard blood tests in 124 women (age 64.9 yr +/- 7.9) with manifest and variously treated postmenopausal osteoporosis. Subsequently, new spine fractures were assessed after 1 yr and, in a subset of 87 women, after 2 yr. Prevalent fractures turned out to be the strongest predictor of subsequent vertebral fractures with an age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 3.9 per prevalent fracture over 2 yr. Furthermore, our results underline the predictive power of spinal BMD (sOR = 2.1; standardized OR per 1 standard deviation population variance decrease), whole body BMD (sOR: 2.4), and QUS stiffness index of the calcaneus (sOR: 2.8) for vertebral fracture prediction. QUS of the patella did not predict vertebral fractures. Blood sedimentation rate was predictive in the first year (sOR: 1.9). The predictive power of bone turnover markers, however, appeared to be too low to be detectable in a group of this sample size and it may have been reduced because most women were already receiving treatment. In conclusion, radiographic measures, but not the tested laboratory bone turnover markers, enabled us to identify women (from a population of osteoporotic women who have been treated for some time with a variety of medications) who are at highest risk for developing new vertebral fractures within 1-2 yr.

In vivo performance evaluation of the Achilles Insight QUS device

Achilles plus (GE, Lunar) has been widely used worldwide for more than a decade, and for its precision, ability to predict fragility fractures and comparability to central DXA, it can be considered a reference standard among quantitative ultrasound devices. As a water-bath system, Achilles plus has obvious practical drawbacks. Achilles Insight is a new-generation device that gives ultrasound parameters in less than 1 min, providing real-time imaging of the os calcis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of Achilles Insight in comparison to Achilles plus. The precision showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.5 and 0.4%, 4.1 and 3.0%, 2.7 and 2.1%, respectively, for speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and Stiffness obtained with Achilles plus and Achilles Insight. We also studied 117 postmenopausal women (mean age: 67.1+/-8.8 yr), 47 with and 70 without fragility fractures. Ultrasound parameters obtained by the two devices significantly (p<0.001) correlated and resulted in agreement according to the Bland and Altman method. Achilles plus and Achilles Insight showed similar values of areas under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves in discriminating patients with or without fractures (0.884, 0.82, and 0.879 for SOS, BUA, and Stiffness, respectively, with Achilles plus, and 0.882, 0.828, and 0.889, respectively, for Achilles Insight). In conclusion, the better precision of the Achilles Insight with respect to Achilles plus could be explained by the fact that the measurement with Achilles Insight needs less time and gives a consequent reduction in motion artifacts. The high correlation and the similar ability to identify postmenopausal women with vertebral fracture suggest the possibility of using the database of Achilles plus for Achilles Insight.

Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study

We compared the performance of five QUS devices with DXA in a population-based sample of 2837 women. All QUS approaches discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS of the calcaneus performed as well as central DXA.

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods have found widespread use for the assessment of bone status in osteoporosis, but their optimal use remains to be established. To determine QUS performance for current devices in direct comparison with central DXA, we initiated a large population-based investigation, the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 463 women 20-39 years of age and 2374 women 55-79 years of age were measured on five different QUS devices along with DXA of the spine and the proximal femur. Their vertebral fracture status was evaluated radiographically. The association of QUS and DXA with vertebral fracture status was evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

All QUS approaches tested discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures (20% height reduction), with age-adjusted standardized odds ratios ranging 1.2-1.3 for amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SOS) at the finger phalanges, 1.2-1.4 for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) at the calcaneus, and 1.4-1.5 for speed of sound (SOS) at the calcaneus, 1.4-1.6 for DXA of the total femur, and 1.5-1.6 for DXA at the spine. For more severe fractures (40% height reduction), age-adjusted standardized odds ratios increased to up to 1.9 for DXA of the spine and 2.3 for SOS of the calcaneus.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, all five QUS devices tested showed significant age-adjusted differences between subjects with and without vertebral fracture. When selecting the strongest variable, QUS of the calcaneus worked as well as central DXA for identification of women at high risk for prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS-based case-finding strategies would allow halving the number of radiographs in high-risk populations, and this strategy works increasingly well for women with more severe vertebral fractures. It is likely that the good performance of QUS was in part achieved by rigorous quality assurance measures that should also be used in clinical practice.

Tibial ultrasound velocity in women with wrist fracture

The aim of the study was to determine whether cortical midtibial speed of sound (Soundscan 2000, Myriad Ultrasound Systems, Israel) was able to discriminate women who sustained a fracture of the distal radius from normal women and to compare the performance of tibial speed of sound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the distal radius, hip, and lumbar spine. The study population consisted of 40 women with a wrist fracture and 41 healthy age-matched controls. Tibial ultrasound velocity correlated with bone mineral density of the distal forearm (rS = 0.64, p < 0.001), the hip (rS = 0.46, p < 0.001), and the lumbar spine (rS = 0.51, p < 0.001). The mean speed of sound value at the mid-tibia of the wrist fracture patients (3873 m/s) was lower than that of the controls (3913 m/s), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). All DXA values were significantly lower in fracture cases. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that mid-tibial ultrasound velocity was less effective than DXA of the distal forearm to discriminate wrist fracture patients from age-matched controls.

Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound measurements is similar to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a Brazilian women population with osteoporotic fracture

The discriminating ability and relevance of clinical risk factors, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) variables, X-ray-based bone mineral density (BMD) and hip axis length (HAL) measurements to evaluate the risk of osteoporotic fracture in elderly Brazilian women were examined in this study. QUS at the calcaneus (Achilles +, Lunar), HAL and BMD measurements (DPX-L, Lunar) at several anatomical sites were performed in 275 postmenopausal Caucasian women. Patients with suspected secondary osteoporosis were excluded. One hundred twenty-two (44.4%) women had had previous osteoporotic fracture. All of the subjects were over 50 years old (range 53-93) and answered a questionnaire that included details concerning aspects of lifestyle, diet, hormonal factors and drug use. Lateral thoracic and lumbar radiographs were taken and an independent radiologist reviewed the X-rays for the presence of vertebral fractures. After adjustments for age, the most relevant risk factors to discriminate patients with osteoporotic fracture from normal non-fracture controls were Stiffness index (OR 2.8 per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 2.3, 8.7), familial history of hip fracture (OR 2.6 per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 2.2, 5.4), femoral neck BMD (OR 2.3 per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 1.9, 4.2), age (OR 2.1 per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 1.6, 2.8) and weight (OR 1.9 per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 1.5, 2.6). HAL measurements did not associate significantly with the risk of hip fracture in this population. The ability of QUS measurements discriminate between patients with fractures from those without was similar to, if not better, than X-ray-based BMD measurements. However, a combination of QUS and BMD measurements did not significantly improve fracture discrimination compared with either technique alone. Association of clinical risk factors with QUS or BMD measurements seems, on the other hand, to increase the sensibility to identify patients at risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Comparison of imaging-guided and non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography of the calcaneus with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and femur

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement between imaging-guided and non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography of the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine and femur to show osteoporosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In 113 patients (73 women, 59 +/- 14 years old; 40 men, 48 +/- 16 years old), dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur, imaging-guided quantitative sonography, and non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography of the calcaneus were performed. The percentage of patients having a T-score equal to or less than a threshold of -2.5 SDs (prevalence of osteoporosis) was calculated for each imaging technique. The diagnostic agreement of the three techniques in identifying individuals with osteoporosis was assessed.

RESULTS

Eleven percent of the women and 8% of the men were classified as osteoporotic by imaging-guided quantitative sonography, and 38% of the women and 25% of the men were so classified by non-imaging-guided quantitative sonography. At dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine, 44% of the women and 38% of the men were classified as osteoporotic, and, at different femoral regions, 19-60% of the women and 8-38% of the men were so classified. Kappa analysis for both quantitative sonography techniques was not significant. Kappa analysis for both quantitative sonography techniques and dual X-ray absorptiometry showed diagnostic agreement to be generally poor.

CONCLUSION

No advantage in diagnostic accuracy could be found for imaging-guided quantitative sonography. The considerable diagnostic disagreement between both quantitative sonography techniques and dual X-ray absorptiometry could be confusing in daily clinical practice.

Hip fracture discrimination study: QUS of the radius and the calcaneum

As an emerging alternative to current radiation-based bone densitometry techniques, there is a growing interest in the use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements for the noninvasive assessment of fracture risk in the management of osteoporosis. However, there are also a multiplicity of technologically different QUS devices available on the market and, so far, no study has compared heel and radius QUS device for the discrimination of subjects with hip fractures. Our study evaluated the ability of three QUS devices (one calcaneal gel-coupled system, one calcaneal water-coupled system, and one radius system) to discriminate osteoporotic from controls subjects, using the same population. We also checked if the combination of two different skeletal sites (i.e., calcaneum and radius) improve the discriminatory ability of the QUS devices. Forty-five women aged 79.1+/-7.1 yr with hip fractures within the last 4 d were used as the hip-fracture group and compared to 40 healthy controls from 65-87 yr. In addition, 47 young controls, aged 20-40 yr, were used as reference population to express some of the results as T-scores. QUS measurements were performed with the Hologic Sahara, Ge-Lunar Achilles+, and Sunlight Omnisense devices according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Adjusted odds ratio results showed that a decrease in Omnisense SOS of 1 standard deviation (SD) was associated with a significant increase in fracture risk (OR adj.=2.83) comparable with Sahara BUA (OR adj.=2.42) and Achilles BUA (OR adj.=3.29). However, given the large overlap between the 95% intervals of each odds ratio, no significant difference was found between the devices. Similarly, comparison between the areas under ROC curves did not show any significant difference between all the parameters. Considering the parameters provided per default by each QUS device, the Sahara, Achilles, and Omnisense devices classified correctly 70, 67.5, and 62.5% of the subjects, respectively. Although the OR of the combination of radius and calcaneum is improved (3.62 to 4.74) compared with either one of the single skeletal site, the large confidence intervals do not allow to claim a significant difference. The three QUS technologies tested against hip fractures seem to show the same discriminatory ability. However, there is some differences in the definition of the diagnostic threshold underlying the nonusability of the World Health Organization (WHO) osteoporosis definition. Finally the combination of several site using two different devices is not clinically relevant. Potential interest could be seen in combining several sites using the same device, supposing that such device would measure differently active bone.

Evaluation of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in a primary care setting as a screening tool for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Screening of osteoporosis by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has become widely available in Europe, but no clear strategies for its clinical use have been established. The aim of this study was to validate the use of QUS in a cross-sectional study carried out in three primary care centers. Measurements of calcaneal QUS and bone mineral density (BMD) at proximal femur were obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis was diagnosed by DXA T-score <or= -2.5 at the femoral neck. Sensitivity, specificity, kappa index, and receives operator characteristics (ROC) curve QUS values were calculated with respect to the standard reference. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) were used to calculate the optimum cut-off levels. Two hundred and sixty-seven women aged 65 or older were included. Fifty-five percent had osteoporotic femoral neck BMD values (T-score <or= -2.5). The same threshold for QUS yielded a lower prevalence of osteoporosis (10%). Women with BMD diagnosis of osteoporosis were older and showed lower age-adjusted values for all QUS parameters (p < 0.001). Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.662-0.678 for the different QUS parameters; correlation and concordance of all parameters with femoral neck BMD were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Cut-off values calculated from the AUC yielded 61.1% sensitivity and 65.3% specificity for the best QUS parameter (i.e., Estimated Heel T-score <or= -1.55). Estimated Heel T-score values of +0.05 or above ruled out osteoporosis (LR 0.18), whereas those -2.50 or below supported the diagnosis (LR 5.98). The application of these cutoff points allowed classification of 22.1% of cases. In conclusion, in postmenopausal women, QUS screening conclusively confirms or rules out osteoporosis in approximately one-fifth of cases, thereby avoiding the need for a DXA measurement.

Ability of ultrasound bone profile score (UBPS) to discriminate between fractured and not fractured osteoporotic women

In this study, we evaluated the ability of different quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters (speed of sound, SOS, coefficient of variation, CV, = 0.34% and broadband ultrasound (US) attenuation, BUA, CV = 3.25% measured at the heel by an Hologic Sahara unit; Ad-Sos and ultrasound bone profile score (UBPS) at the proximal phalanges by an Igea DBM Sonic 1200 unit, Ad-Sos CV = 0.57%) to detect differences between osteoporotic patients with vertebral fractures and osteoporotic patients without fractures. We examined 87 women with primary osteoporosis: 53 women with femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T scores less than -2.5 SD and no vertebral fractures and 34 women with one or more vertebral fractures, regardless of T score values. Considering all the patients together, the correlations between QUS parameters and BMD resulted in statistical significance (p < 0.05) only for BUA and femoral neck BMD. Lumbar and femoral neck BMD did not statistically differ between the two groups, while UBPS, which is a quality control of measurement and is correlated with bone quality, was significantly higher in women without fractures than those with fractures; the other QUS parameters were not statistically different. Our data indicate that, among QUS parameters, only UBPS is able to detect differences among osteoporotic patients with and without vertebral fractures.

Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study

The discriminatory potential to classify subjects with or without vertebral fractures was tested cross-sectionally with different methods for the measurement of bone status in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurement at the calcaneus (Lunar Achilles, Hologic Sahara), the proximal phalanges (Igea Bone Profiler), and measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Lunar Expert) at several anatomic sites was performed in 500 postmenopausal women (aged 65-75 years) randomly selected from the population. In addition, 50 young female subjects (20-40 years old) had QUS measurements and served as controls to express QUS results as T-score values. Radiographs of the lumbar and thoracic spine were performed in the elderly women. Two independent radiologists reviewed the X-rays for the presence of vertebral fractures. Of 486 eligible study participants, no fracture was seen in 396 participants. Single vertebral fractures were observed in 71 subjects; 19 individuals presented multiple fractures. The overall prevalence of vertebral fractures was 18.5%. Participants without vertebral fractures were compared with subjects with vertebral fractures. Normal statistical distributions were found for all bone measurement results. Risk of vertebral fracture in subjects with no and multiple vertebral fracture was estimated using age adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for QUS and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) values. Each SD decrease in bone measurement increased the risk of multiple vertebral fracture by 3.0 (95% CI, 1.6-5.6) for the Achilles stiffness, by 3.8 (95% CI, 1.8-8.2) for the Sahara QUI, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.3-3.4) for the Bone Profiler amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SOS), and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2-3.9) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3-4.3) for DXA lumbar spine and for DXA total hip, respectively. Results of a discriminant analysis showed sensitivities between 84% and 58% and specificities between 72% and 58% for the respective DXA and QUS parameters. Optimum fracture thresholds for QUS measurements derived from this analysis were calculated also. Optimum T-score threshold values for QUS measurements tended to be higher than those for DXA measurements. However, the performance of QUS measurements is at least comparable with DXA measurements in identifying subjects with multiple vertebral fractures randomly selected from the population.

Quality controls for two heel bone ultrasounds used in the Swiss Evaluation of the Methods of Measurement of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Study

Because of the important morbidity and mortality associated with osteoporosis, it is essential to detect subjects at risk by screening methods, such as bone quantitative ultrasounds (QUSs). Several studies showed that QUS could predict fractures. None, however, compared prospectively different QUS devices, and few data of quality controls (QCs) have been published. The Swiss Evaluation of the Methods of Measurement of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk is a prospective multicenter study that compared three QUSs for the assessment of hip fracture risk in a population of 7609 women age >/=70 yr. Because the inclusion phase lasted 20 mo, and because 10 centers participated in this study, QC became a major issue. We therefore developed a QC procedure to assess the stability and precision of the devices, and for their cross-calibration. Our study focuses on the two heel QUSs. The water bath system (Achilles+) had a higher precision than the dry system (Sahara). The QC results were highly dependent on temperature. QUS stability was acceptable, but Sahara must be calibrated regularly. A sufficient homogeneity among all the Sahara devices could be demonstrated, whereas significant differences were found among the Achilles+ devices. For speed of sound, 52% of the differences among the Achilles+ was explained by the water s temperature. However, for broadband ultrasound attenuation, a maximal difference of 23% persisted after adjustment for temperature. Because such differences could influence measurements in vivo, it is crucial to develop standardized phantoms to be used in prospective multicenter studies.

Quantitative US of the calcaneus: cutoff levels for the distinction of healthy and osteoporotic individuals

PURPOSE

To calculate cutoff levels for quantitative ultrasonography (US) performed to distinguish healthy individuals and those with osteoporosis identified with dual x-ray absorptiometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 1,357 patients (856 females, aged 55.1 years +/- 15.4 [mean +/- SD]; 501 males, aged 50.4 years +/- 15), bone mineral density measurements of the lumbar spine (posteroanterior, L1 through L4) and femoral neck were obtained, and quantitative US was performed to determine the stiffness of the calcaneus. Individuals with a T score less than -2.5 (osteoporotic) at the spine and femur were identified, and upper T-score cutoff values (3 SDs from the mean) in the groups of male and female patients with osteoporosis were identified.

RESULTS

Females with dual x-ray absorptiometric values that were indicative of osteoporosis of the spine had an upper T-score cutoff value of -1.0 (males, -0.2). Females who had femoral osteoporosis showed an upper quantitative US T-score cutoff value of -0.6 (males, 0).

CONCLUSION

Cutoff values may permit the use of quantitative US to screen for the presence of osteoporosis in the spine and femur. Quantitative US will help to prevent unnecessary dual x-ray absorptiometric and conventional radiographic examinations.

Ultrasonic backscatter and transmission parameters at the os calcis in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Ultrasound technology has emerged as a new tool in the assessment of osteoporosis. Ultrasound parameters usually are measured in transmission; there is a potential for the analysis of backscattered signals to provide information on bone microarchitecture. The aim of this study was to explore a new technological development of the method, adding backscatter coefficient to transmission parameters, and to examine the appropriate thresholds to identify postmenopausal osteoporotic women. We examined 210 postmenopausal women (including 60 with osteoporotic fractures) and 30 healthy premenopausal controls. They had lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) evaluation at the os calcis, measured in transmission (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA], speed of sound [SOS], ratio of transit time [dt] to BUA [dt/BUA], and "strength" index [STI]) and reflexion (broadband ultrasound backscattering [BUB]). The standardized CVs (sCVs) were between 2.27 % and 3.40 % for QUS measured in transmission and 4.41% for BUB. The odds ratio (OR) for fracture discrimination adjusted for age was 2.77 for hip BMD and between 1.6 and 2.9 for QUS. After adjustment for hip BMD, ORs were still highly significant for SOS, STI, and dt/BUA. According to hip BMD T score, prevalence of osteoporosis in our population was 39%. To detect the same prevalence, T scores ranged between -0.95 and -1.42 for QUS. QUS parameters have adequate ability to discriminate osteoporotic patients from controls. The World Health Organization (WHO) threshold for diagnosis of osteoporosis does not apply to this technology. The clinical utility of BUB at the os calcis, in addition to usual ultrasound parameters, is not yet proven. However, BUB evaluation, which does not require two transducers and may be implemented in conventional reflection mode systems, warrants further studies.

The clinical role of quantitative ultrasound in assessing fracture risk and bone status

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) analysis of calcaneal bone is useful to quantify fracture risk, and in monitoring response to treatment and identifying bone changes associated with disease and medication. However, diagnosis of osteoporosis by QUS measurements remains contentious, but the problems are due to the limitations of the present T-scores rather than the technique. QUS offers the potential for the widespread detection of low bone mass and subsequent management and prevention of fracture.

Quantitative ultrasound in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Ultrasound has been proposed as a low-cost, radiation-free method for osteoporosis assessment in postmenopausal women. Large prospective studies have shown that ultrasound parameters can be used for fracture risk estimate in this population, providing that adequate quality control is performed. The places of both ultrasound and the current gold standard method for bone assessment, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, are still to be determined. Further studies are needed on the diagnosis of osteoporosis using ultrasound, because current diagnostic thresholds, designed by the World Health Organization, do not apply to this-new technology. Monitoring of skeletal changes and treatment effects by ultrasound cannot be recommended.

Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors--which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis?

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current technique of choice to assess risk of future fracture and to diagnose osteoporosis as defined by bone mineral density (BMD). Guidelines for bone densitometry referral have been published listing clinical risk factors that might be considered grounds for assessment. However, these factors are known to be poorly predictive of subsequent BMD measurement and, accordingly, new inexpensive methods of selecting subjects for assessment should be sought. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of bone may be such a technique. Women (n = 250) considered by their general practitioners to be at risk of osteoporosis and who had been referred for DXA measurements of the spine and hip were recruited into the study. All underwent a QUS scan of the heel using a McCue CUBA Clinical machine, which measures broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and velocity of sound (VOS), a clinical risk factor questionnaire, and spine and hip BMD measurement by a Norland XR-26 bone densitometer. Patients were categorized according to published diagnostic criteria for BMD, and these were also applied to the QUS parameters. Risk factors were arbitrarily categorized into "low", "medium" and "high" risk groups. Kappa scores were calculated to analyse the agreement between different techniques. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses were undertaken to demonstrate the technique with the best sensitivity and specificity for the detection of low BMD at the spine and hip. Analysis of the bone mass data demonstrated only moderate agreement (kappa 0.33) between femoral neck and spine BMD with femoral neck BMD and BUA showing a very similar level of agreement (kappa 0.31). ROC analysis demonstrated that VOS followed by BUA was the best predictor of low BMD, with risk factors alone being significantly poorer; QUS parameters are better predictors than clinical risk factors for women with low BMD and could be used effectively at the primary care level to indicate those who should be considered for full osteoporosis assessment. However, further study into the cost effectiveness of this approach is required.

A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination

We investigated a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device that measures the acoustic velocity in axial transmission mode along the cortex. Using a prototype of the Omnisense (Sunlight Ultrasound Technologies, Rehovot, Israel), we tested the performance of this instrument at four sites of the skeleton: radius, ulna, metacarpal, and phalanx. Intraobserver (interobserver) precision errors ranged from 0.2% to 0.3% (0.3% to 0.7%) for triplicate measurements with repositioning. Fracture discrimination was tested by comparing a group of 34 women who had previously suffered a fracture of the hip, spine, ankle, or forearm to a group of 28 healthy women who had not suffered a fracture. Age-adjusted standardized odds ratios ranged from 1.6 to 4.5. Except for the ulna the sites showed a significant fracture discrimination (p < 0.01). The areas under the receiver operating curves (ROC) curves were from 0.88 to 0.89 for radius, metacarpal, and phalanx. A combination of the results from the three sites showed a significant increase of the ROC area to 0.95 (p < 0. 05). Our results show promising performance of this new device. The ability to measure a large variety of sites and the potential to combine these measurements are promising with regard to optimizing fracture risk assessment.

Prevalence and risk factors of low quantitative ultrasound values of calcaneus in Korean elderly women

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of bone is a new radiation-free, low-cost method that measures both bone mass and bone quality. This study was performed to establish the normative data of QUS for Korean women and to determine the prevalence and risk factors of low quantitative ultrasound values in a Korean elderly population. We studied 238 healthy women aged 20-29 years working at a hospital, and 552 women over 50 years of age living in six villages of Chung-Up district, a rural area of South Korea, using QUS measurement of bone. Broadband ultrasound attenuation and speed of sound were measured at the calcaneus, and an index combining these factors (stiffness index) was calculated. T-score was calculated from the data of young normal subjects. Of the 552 elderly women, 34.2% had T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5, and 11.8% had T-scores below -2.5. The prevalence of low quantitative ultrasound values increased with older age, longer duration following menopause, lower body mass index, younger age at menopause and smoking. In multiple logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio = 1.40 per 5 years, P < 0.05), duration following menopause (odds ratio = 1.35 per 5 years, P < 0.05) and body mass index (odds ratio = 0.78 per quartile, P < 0.05) were independently associated with low quantitative ultrasound values. These results suggested that quantitative ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus could be a useful tool for epidemiological surveys of bone mass.

A prospective study of quantitative ultrasound in children and adolescents

The accrual of optimal bone mass during childhood and adolescence is essential for the formation of a skeleton that will meet structural needs throughout life. Assessing bone health of children is becoming increasingly important in order to identify those who require interventions, and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has appeal for these assessments. The purpose of this prospective study was to characterize changes in QUS values in 328 healthy children and adolescents over a 3-yr period. Measurements of QUS, height, weight, nutrient intake, fracture history, and Tanner stage were made at baseline and 3 yr later. Both females and males experienced significant increases in QUS values during the study. The rate of change of QUS peaked at an earlier age in females than in males, and maximum accumulation rates in both genders occurred at ages at which highest accumulation rates are seen with densitometry. Females exhibited higher QUS values than males during puberty, also similar to results for dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This is the first report of prospective data of QUS in children and adolescents. Our findings that QUS values change during childhood and adolescence in a manner similar to DXA values, the "gold standard," provide support for the validity of using QUS to assess bone health in children and adolescents.

Ultrasound measurement using CUBA clinical system can discriminate between women with and without vertebral fractures. Contact Ultrasound Bone Analyzer

The purpose of this study was to assess the ultrasound (US) parameters measured by Contact Ultrasound Bone Analyser (CUBA) clinical system for discriminating the subjects with vertebral fractures from those without vertebral fractures. The subjects consisted of 114 postmenopausal women over age 50 (mean +/- SD: 72.2 +/- 8.7). Seventy-three had vertebral fractures (fracture group) and 41 had no vertebral fractures (control group). Values of all US parameters and bone mineral density (BMD) in the fracture group were significantly lower than those in the control group, even after adjusting for age. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.768 +/- 0.056 (mean +/- SE) for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) 0.828 +/- 0.045 for velocity of sound (VOS), 0.707 +/- 0.058 for lumbar spine, 0.872 +/- 0.050 for femur neck, 0.790 +/- 0.050 for trochanter, and 0.695 +/- 0.060 for Ward's triangle. There were no significant differences among the areas under the ROC curves in BUA, VOS, lumbar spine, femur neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle. US parameters (BUA and VOS) had the same discriminatory power as spine and hip BMD for evaluating the vertebral fracture risk. As far as disadvantages of the use of BMD measurement against US measurement, US measurement is potentially useful for screening of vertebral fractures. However, the bias concerning the propotion of the number of patients with or without vertebral fractures could not be neglected in this study.

Bone assessment in elderly women: what does a low bone ultrasound result tell us about bone mineral density?

Access to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can prove difficult for frail or elderly patients, and bone ultrasound may offer a practical alternative. Even after adjustment for bone mineral density (BMD), ultrasound readings are able to predict hip fracture in elderly women. We consider how bone ultrasound might contribute to bone assessment in a clinical setting. DXA remains the gold standard for bone assessment, with osteoporosis defined as a BMD result more than 2.5 S.D. below the young adult mean. Using an equivalent approach we defined an osteoporotic ultrasound result as broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA)<54 dB/MHz. In 73 women aged 29-86 (mean 65) years DXA was used to measure BMD at lumbar spine and hip, and ultrasound to measure BUA at the heel. Correlation of BUA with BMD at femoral neck (r=0.64, P<0.001), and lumbar spine (r=0.55, P<0.001) was consistent with previously reported figures for this ultrasound system. All subjects with BUA below the 54 dB/MHz threshold value were shown to have low femoral neck BMD. Women (42%) aged over 65, but only 18% of younger women had low BUA results. In women over 65 years of age measurements of BUA achieved a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 100% in prediction of low femoral neck BMD. Although a normal BUA did not exclude an osteoporotic BMD result at hip or lumbar spine, a low BUA appeared a highly specific predictor of low BMD at these sites. Since all those women identified as having a low BUA at the heel also had low BMD results, ultrasound appeared to identify a subgroup of elderly patients at a very high risk of fracture.

Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture?

There is a growing interest in the use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements as an alternative to current radiation-based bone densitometry techniques for the noninvasive assessment of fracture risk. While most of the commercialized ultrasound devices measure only single predefined peripheral skeletal sites, the Omnisense prototype (Sunlight Ltd., Israel) can be used on multiple bones, including the spinous processes. In this study, we examined the ability of speed of sound measured at the calcaneus, distal third and ultradistal radius, proximal third phalanx, metacarpal, capitate, patella, and the posterior process of the thoracic spine to differentiate subjects with hip fractures from normal controls. Seventy-nine postmenopausal Caucasian Israeli women who had sustained an atraumatic fracture of the proximal femur within the last 6 months were recruited from the local population (mean age 80 +/- 8.9 years). As controls, 295 postmenopausal Caucasian Israeli women without osteoporotic fractures were also included (mean age 70 +/- 8.7 years). Discrimination of hip fractures with QUS at all ultrasound sites was highly statistically significant (p < 0.01) (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.4-3.0; area under the ROC curve [AUC] 77-92%), except for the hand metacarpal. Distal radius and calcaneus measurements (ORs = 2.4 and 3.0) were the best discriminators of hip fracture patients from controls. Using a forward selective linear regression model, the discriminator values of combined assessment at two sites were investigated. There was moderate improvement in diagnostic value, but the best combination was the calcaneus with the distal radius, which improved the AUC by 3% and raised both the sensitivity and specificity to 94%. These data demonstrate the encouraging potential of improving discrimination of hip fracture by using multiple-site ultrasonic measurements.

Correlation of quantitative ultrasound of bone with biochemical markers of bone resorption in women with osteoporotic fractures

The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation of parameters of bone quality assessed by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) with biochemical indexes of bone resorption. QUS of the calcaneus and the hand phalanges, and biochemical parameters (urinary excretion of pyridinoline [Pyr] and deoxypyridinoline [D-Pyr]) were measured in a group of 30 well-characterized postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis and fragility fractures. All patients were treatment free. QUS data significantly correlated with both urinary Pyr and D-Pyr (p < 0.001 for speed of sound [SOS], broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA], and stiffness at the heel; p < 0.001 for amplitude-dependent SOS at the proximal phalanges of the nondominant hand). No significant correlation was observed between spine and femoral bone mineral density and the urinary excretion of Pyr and D-Pyr. Results of this study suggest that QUS of bone evaluates characteristics of bone influenced by the bone resorption rate.

Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-Ray absorptiometry measurements in women with and without fractures

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered a gold standard for bone measurements in the assessment of osteoporosis. Other techniques such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) are promising to detect patients with osteoporosis-related fractures and to predict fracture risk. In this cross-sectional retrospective study, we analyzed the behavior of QUS and DXA measurements alone and in combination with regard to the presence of fractures in 320 women, 147 with nontraumatic fractures. Speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and a third parameter derived from SOS and BUA called stiffness were measured at the calcaneus using an Achilles device (Lunar, Madison, WI). Lumbar (BMDL) and hip (BMDH( bone mineral density were measured by DXA (Hologic QDR 1000, Waltham, MA). Mean SOS, BUA, stiffness, and BMDL and BMDH were significantly lower in women with fractures compared with women without fractures. Logistic regression adjusted for age identified stiffness as the parameter most strongly associated with the presence of fracture: its sensitivity was 54% and specificity 70%. Hip BMD was second, with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 69%. Combining QUS and DXA measurements did not improve the specificity nor the sensitivity. There was no difference in the odds ratios with regard to the technique that was chosen for bone assessment. In conclusion, these results suggest that low QUS measurements are associated with the presence of fractures in a way similar to DXA. In our study, the combination of QUS and DXA did not improve the discrimination of women with fractures.

Comparison of ultrasound and bone mineral density assessment of the calcaneus with different regions of interest in healthy early menopausal women

This study investigated the effect of different sized regions of interest (ROIs) on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) variables of the calcaneus. The effect on QUS of using a fixed ROI as opposed to an ROI adjusted for foot length was also assessed. Eighty Caucasian women, aged 50-57 yr (mean 53 +/- 2) who were healthy and within 0. 5-5 yr of the onset of menopause participated in this study. Using the QUS-1(trade mark) Ultrasonometer (Metra Biosystems, Mountain View, CA), we assessed broadband ultrasound attenuation ([BUA] and UBI-4, dB/MHz), the average transit time through the heel ([TTH], mus) and a multiple-factor index (UBI-4T = UBI-4/TTH, dB/[MHz. mus]). The QUS measurement results were calculated from three different sizes of ROI as well as one in a fixed location and one adjusted for foot size. Bone thickness, bone width, bone mineral content ([BMC], g/cm), bone mineral density area ([BMD(a)], g/cm(2)), and bone mineral density volume ([BMD(v)], g/cm(3)) were measured by single-energy photon absorptiometry. Lateral radiography of the foot was used to ensure the QUS scanning location in a subgroup. The results showed that there was a 1.4-5.9% difference in QUS parameters among different ROIs (p = 0.076-0.001). No significant differences between fixed and adjusted location were found regarding the mean values of QUS. The correlation between the fixed and adjusted locations was very strong, although there was a 12-42% unexplained variation. On the other hand, QUS in the size-adjusted ROI increased the correlation with BMC/BMD compared to the fixed QUS assessments. After controlling for body weight and height, a significant correlation between QUS and bone mass variables remained, and in some cases correlations became stronger. Lateral radiography showed that when using a fixed location to scan a large foot, the scanning area might be close to the bone edge, an area of higher BMD and potential acoustic artifacts. When scanning a small foot, the scanning area was confined to the middle of the calcaneus. Our results indicate that bone size has a modest effect on BUA. There is a better correlation with BMD when the measurement region is appropriately located in the calcaneus. This suggests that measurement location based on foot size may improve the accuracy of the measurements, resulting in good diagnostic sensitivity.

Bone densitometry: applications in sports-medicine

Physical exercise and sports increase muscular mass and the remodelling process of bones. The increment of bone depends on the type and the quality of sport. Short-term high-performance activities such as sprint, tennis, fencing lead to increased bone mineral density as well as weight lifting or heavy athletics. Swimming, bicycling, walking are associated with good musculature conditioning without an increase of bone mass. The effects on the bone by performing endurance activities are controversially discussed. Excessive sport leads to an increase of fatigue fractures. Low bone mass may result from hormonal disregulation in female athletes.

Genetic and environmental contributions to the association between quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density measurements: a twin study

This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty-nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins between 20 and 83 years of age (53 +/- 13 years, mean +/- SD) were studied. Digital (phalangeal) QUS (speed of sound [SOS]) and calcaneal QUS (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA] and velocity of sound [VOS]) were measured using a DBM Sonic 1200 ultrasound densitometer and a CUBA ultrasound densitometer, respectively. Femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total body (TB) BMD were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Familial resemblance and hence heritability (proportion of variance of a trait attributable to genetic factors) were assessed by analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate model-fitting genetic analyses. In both QUS and BMD parameters, MZ twins were more alike than DZ pairs. Estimates of heritability for age- and weight-adjusted BUA, VOS, and SOS were 0.74, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Corresponding indices of heritability for LS, FN, and TB BMD were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. In cross-sectional analysis, both BUA and SOS, but not VOS, were independently associated with BMD measurements. However, analysis based on intrapair differences suggested that only BUA was related to BMD. Bivariate genetic analysis indicated that the genetic correlations between BUA and BMD ranged between 0.43 and 0.51 (p < 0.001), whereas the environmental correlations ranged between 0.20 and 0.28 (p < 0.01). While the genetic correlations within QUS and BMD measurements were significant, factor analysis indicates that common genes affect BMD at different sites. Also, individual QUS measurements appear to be influenced by some common sets of genes rather than by environmental factors. Significant environmental correlations were only found for BMD measurements and ranged between 0.50 and 0.65 (p < 0.001). These data suggest that QUS and BMD measurements are highly heritable traits. While it appears that there is a common set of genes influencing both QUS and BMD measurements, specific genes yet to be identified appear to have greater effects than that of shared genes in each trait.

Bone mineral density assessed by quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Normative data in Malmö, Sweden

We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in 128 men and 143 women, aged 22-90, by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS). We found reduced bone mineral density in relation to age as measured both by DEXA and QUS. There was a correlation between 0.28 and 0.52 in men and between 0.53 and 0.77 in women when comparing DEXA and QUS measurements. When including only persons with low bone mass, the correlation was less.

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel predicts wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures in women age 45-75 years

This study was designed to determine the ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel to predict fracture risk at different sites in postmenopausal women between the ages of 45 and 75 years. Heel QUS was measured at baseline using a Lunar Achilles scanner, and subsequent fractures were identified over 3 yr. The results were analyzed graphically after age adjustment and using Cox's proportional regression to estimate odds ratios for fracture risk; 3180 women were scanned (79% of sample). Sixty-three wrist, 12 hip, 4 vertebral, 7 proximal humerus, 3 pelvic, and 61 other fractures were identified over a mean followup of 31 mo. There was a fivefold difference in numbers of wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures (hip, vertebra, pelvis, and humerus combined) between the lowest and highest quartiles of QUS results adjusted for age. The odds ratios per 1 SD decline in QUS parameters adjusted for age were: wrist fractures BUA = 1.6, SOS = 1.5, stiffness = 1.8, osteoporosis-related fractures BUA = 1.9, speed of sound (SOS) = 1.6, stiffness = 2.2, and other fractures, BUA = 1.0, SOS = 1.1, stiffness = 1.1. When analyzed for each 10-yr age group, the odds ratios were generally higher in the 56-65 yr group than the other decades. In women between 45 and 75 yr, heel QUS can predict wrist and osteoporosis- related fractures at about the same level that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of various sites can predict wrist fractures. This extends the current evidence that heel QUS can predict hip fracture risk in women over 75 yr to include other fracture sites in younger women. Heel QUS may be useful in the primary care assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk in women after the menopause.

The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: a review

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) bone measurement is a promising, relatively new technique for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Unlike to the more established method of bone densitometry [measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) e.g. using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)], QUS does not use ionizing radiation. It is cheaper, takes up less space and is easier to use than densitometry techniques. The two QUS parameters currently measured are broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS). The reported age-related changes for healthy women range from -0.27% to -1.62% per year for BUA and from -0.06% to -0.19% per year for SOS. Precision ranges from 1.0 to 3.8% (CV) for BUA and from 0.19 to 0.30% (CV) for SOS. The new method of imaging ultrasound has improved the precision of QUS measurements. QUS is significantly correlated with BMD. Studies with the latest equipment have shown r-values between 0.6 and 0.9 in site-specific measurements, and QUS is thus believed to reflect mainly BMD. However, other studies indicate that QUS measures something other than the actual mineral content of bone, namely bone quality, e.g. in vitro studies have shown that QUS reflects trabecular orientation independently of BMD. In both cross-sectional and prospective studies, QUS seems to be as good a predictor of osteoporotic fractures as BMD. In two large prospective studies, QUS also predicted fracture risk independently of BMD. QUS has just begun to be used systematically for monitoring the response to anti-osteoporotic treatments in prospective trials. In the studies performed, QUS has been found to be useful in the follow-up of patients. QUS is thus a promising new technique for bone assessment.

Utility of ultrasound to assess risk of fracture

Traditional assessments of bone properties have utilized densitometry techniques such as Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Recently, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been introduced as an alternative method of assessing bone properties. Advantages of QUS over X-ray techniques include low costs, portability, and nonionizing radiation. Proponents of QUS have claimed that this technology can provide information not only about the density but also about the structure and mechanical properties of bone. There are two major questions that need to be answered for those who seek to diagnose bone disorders with ultrasound: (1) what does quantitative ultrasound actually measure, and, even more importantly, (2) what is its clinical utility? In this review we will briefly examine the first question and will focus on the utility of ultrasound in clinical trials to discriminate between fractures and non-fractures and to predict the risk of fractures.

Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. The International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods have been introduced in recent years for the assessment of skeletal status in osteoporosis. The performance of QUS techniques has been evaluated in a large number of studies. Reviewing existing knowledge, an international expert panel formulated the following consensus regarding the current status of this technology. To date, evidence supports the use of QUS techniques for the assessment of fracture risk in elderly women. This has been best established for water-based calcaneal QUS systems. Future studies should include the predictive validity of other QUS systems. Additional clinical applications of QUS, specifically the assessment of rates of change for monitoring disease progression or response to treatment, require further investigation. Its low cost and portability make QUS an attractive technology for assessing risk of fractures in larger populations than may be suitable or feasible for bone densitometry. Additional investigations that assess innovative QUS techniques in well defined research settings are important to determine and utilize the full potential of this technology for the benefit of early detection and monitoring of osteoporosis.

How can we measure bone quality?

Osteoporosis is a systematic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. This leads to diminished biomechanical competence of the skeleton and is associated with low-trauma or atraumatic fractures. In the past decade, considerable progress has been made in the development of methods for assessing the skeleton non-invasively, so that osteoporosis can be better managed. While dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is still the preferred methodology, several limitations will be addressed. Another densitometric technique which is widely accepted for diagnosis of spinal osteoporosis is single energy QCT. Measurements of vertebral trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrate larger percentage decrements between vertebrally-fractured subjects and normal controls, and confer higher relative risks for vertebral fracture than either anteroposterior or lateral DXA measurements. As an emerging alternative to photon absorptiometry techniques, there is a growing interest in the use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements for the non-invasive assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk in the management of osteoporosis. The attractiveness of QUS lies in the fact that indirect and in vitro experience has suggested that ultrasound may give information not only about BMD but also about architecture and elasticity. Whether or not combining QUS and DXA improve fracture prediction is still unclear and needs further analysis. Due to the growing evidence supporting the use of QUS in osteoporosis and the large number of QUS devices already on the market, a general clinical consensus on the application of QUS is urgently needed. Other techniques that are less widely used for the management of osteoporosis. For example, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) and magnetic resonance microscopy are promising tools for the evaluation of the skeleton. For example, the ability of QMR and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging has been explored and shows promise as a technique for assessing trabecular bone structure in osteoporosis.

Peripheral measurement techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis

Peripheral measurement techniques have been the first to be developed for the assessment of osteoporosis, and they remain useful. Besides traditional approaches such as radiographic absorptiometry (RA), radiogrammetry, and single-photon absorptiometry (SPA), new peripheral approaches have been developed that offer powerful ways to assess skeletal status in osteoporosis. These include single x-ray absorptiometry (SXA), peripheral dual x-ray absorptiometry (pDXA), peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approaches. This review describes the current role of peripheral imaging techniques vis-à-vis their central imaging counterparts. Peripheral measurement techniques are attractive because equipment cost is substantially lower, radiation exposure is small, and the devices require less space and sometimes are even portable. Additionally, QUS and MRI offer the potential to measure aspects of bone status beyond the limits of bone densitometry. Peripheral techniques represent important diagnostic methods for the assessment of osteoporosis.

The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture

Measurement of ultrasonographic parameters provides information concerning not only bone density but also bone architecture. We investigated the usefulness of ultrasonographic parameters and bone mineral density for evaluating the probability of vertebral fracture. 397 postmenopausal women (59.1 +/- 6.0 years) with (n = 178) or without (n = 219) atraumatic vertebral fractures were studied. In all women, bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was evaluated by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and speed of sound (SOS); broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness in the calcaneus were evaluated by an Achilles unit (Lunar Corporation). Ultrasonographic parameters and BMD were compared by examining the magnitude of the odds ratios, to determine which produces the highest estimate of the probability of odds of fracture, and by examining widths of the respective confidence intervals (CI) to show which estimate of odd ratio is the most precise. The relative risk of vertebral fracture, after adjusting for potential confounders, was 3.5 (CI 2.6-4.8) for BUA; 4.5 (CI 3.2-6.2) for SOS; 5.8 (CI 4.0-8.4) for Stiffness and 7.5 (CI 4.8-11.5) for BMD. Ultrasound (US) parameters were still significant independent predictors of vertebral fracture, even after adjusting for BMD. The relative risk of fracture for a simultaneous decrease by 1 SD of BMD and by 1 SD of each ultrasound parameter was 17.3 (CI 9.4-39.6) for BMD and SOS; 18.3 (CI 8.4-30.6) for BMD and BUA and 22.1 (CI 8.9-52.7) for BMD and Stiffness. Our data suggest that US and BMD provide complementary information which can be combined to improve estimates of vertebral fracture risk.

Overview of role of BMD measurements in managing osteoporosis

The advent of effective treatments and the opportunity to precisely and accurately measure bone mass have probably been the greatest advances in the field of osteoporosis in the last decade. Bone densitometry has become the most widespread noninvasive method for the detection of osteoporosis and to provide advice on risk of future fractures. It has achieved an unquestioned role in clinical decision making for the management of osteoporotic patients.

Assessment of fracture risk by bone density measurements

Bone densitometry in its various applications has become an established tool for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Bone density has been shown to be significantly associated with the risk of future fracture in many prospective studies. From long-term prospective studies, it can be concluded that peak bone density and bone loss are important predictors of subsequent fracture, and that fracture can be predicted over a longer period. Bone density predicts fracture even in elderly persons aged 80 years and older. However, in this population some fractures, such as the cervical hip fracture, may be more strongly influenced by other risk factors. The differences between the various densitometric techniques in predicting future osteoporotic fracture of any type is marginal. However, it seems that bone density measurements at the site of fracture do perform better than measurements at other sites. There is no evidence that measuring a second site improves the diagnostic capability of bone densitometry. The association between bone density and future fracture is partly independent of age and other significant predictors of fracture such as falls, cognizance, and mobility. Quantitative ultrasonic measures of bone quality have been shown to have a predictive capability that is comparable to that of bone density. From the perspective that bone densitometry and quantitative ultrasound independently predict fractures, these measures actually seem complementary rather than competitive. Simple geometric measures of the bones such as hip axis length and vertebral depth may be derived from images of bone densitometry scans and are also predictive of hip fracture or vertebral fracture independently of bone density. Using the current knowledge of the association between bone density, quantitative ultrasound, geometric properties, and fractures as well as clinical risk factors, new models for fracture prediction can be developed for future application in clinical practice for the benefit of the individual patient.