Mechanistic Studies on Rhodium-Catalyzed Chemoselective Cycloaddition of Ene-Vinylidenecyclopropanes: Water-Assisted Proton Transfer

Rhodium-catalyzed cycloaddition reactions are a powerful tool for the construction of polycyclic compounds. Combined experimental and DFT studies were used to investigate the temperature-controlled chemoselectivity of cationic rhodium-catalyzed intramolecular cycloaddition reactions of ene-vinylidenecyclopropanes. After a series of mechanistic studies, it was found that trace amounts of water in the reaction system play an important role in generating the product with endo double bond located on a five-membered ring and revealed that trace amounts of water in the reaction system, including the rhodium catalyst, substrate and solvent, were sufficient to promote the formation of the product with endo double bond located on a five-membered ring, and additional water could not further accelerate the reaction. DFT calculation results show that the addition of water indeed significantly lowers the energy barrier of the proton transfer step, making the formation of the product with endo double bond located on a five-membered ring more likely to occur and confirming the rationality of water-assisted proton transfer occurring in the selective access to the product with endo double bond located on a five-membered ring.

Synthesis of CF3-Containing Linear Nitriles from α-(Trifluoromethyl)styrenes

Four unprecedented base-catalyzed/mediated nucleophilic additions of TMSCN to α-(trifluoromethyl)styrenes and 2-trifluoromethyl enynes were developed. The reaction proceeded smoothly at room temperature under mild and transition-metal-free conditions without affecting the trifluoromethyl group and afforded the corresponding CF₃-containing alkyl, alkynyl, and butadienyl nitriles in moderate to excellent yields in a highly regioselective manner, respectively.

A mechanistic investigation into N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalyzed umpolung of ketones and benzonitriles: is the cyano group better than the classical carbonyl group for the addition of NHC?

The cooperative participation of NHC-H₂O-activated cyano carbon is more preferred than the classical NHC-activated carbonyl carbon.

Mechanistic investigation-inspired activation mode of DBU and the function of the α-diazo group in the reaction of the α-amino ketone compound and EDA: [DBU-H]+-DMF-H2O and α-diazo as strong N-terminal nucleophiles

DFT calculations disclosed a dramatic electronic turnover of the α-diazo group based on an unexpected DBU activation mode.

Mechanistic insights into N-Bromosuccinimide-promoted synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine in water: Reactivity mediated by substrates and solvent

The mechanism of N-Bromosuccinimide (NBS) promoted synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine in water as well as the effective activation modes of NBS was investigated by Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. Two main mechanisms that differ in the reaction sequence of substrate were explored: styrene with NBS then followed by 2-aminopyridine (M1) or simultaneously with NBS and 2-aminopyridine (M2), and water-assisted M2 is the more favored one. We found that the adding sequence of 2-aminopyridine affects profoundly on the title reaction. Moreover, upon the assistance of water and NBS, the preferential mechanistic scenario involves three major processes: nucleophilic addition, stepwise H-shift and intramolecular cyclization, three-step deprotonation, rather than a classical bromonium ion species. Specifically, the cooperative interaction of NBS and water plays a critical role in the title reaction. Water acts as solvent, reactant, anchoring, stabilizer, and catalyst. NBS promotes the above three processes by the effective forms of Br⁺ /Br^- , succinimide, and its ethanol isomer. Furthermore, noncovalent interactions between catalysts and substrates are responsible for the different reactive activities of M1 and M2. Our results indicate that simultaneous adding of all reactants is recommended toward economical synthesis. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mechanistic insight on water and substrate catalyzed the synthesis of 3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-(4-methoxybenzyl)isoindolin-1-one: Driving by noncovalent interactions

The mechanisms of the synthesis of 2-substituted-3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-isoindolin-1-one derivatives have been investigated theoretically under unassisted, self-assisted, and water-assisted conditions. Being different from previously proposed catalyst-free by Hu et al., our results show that the title mechanism can be altered and accelerated by solvent and substrate 2. Two types of mechanisms have been developed by DFT calculations differ in the reaction sequence of substrates 1 with 3 (M1) or 2 (M2) followed by 2 (M1) or 3 (M2), and water-assisted M1 is the most favored one. It was found that the nucleophilicity of substrate 3 is stronger than that of 2. Our calculations suggest that the water-assisted pathway in M1 is the most favorable case, which undergoes nucleophilic addition and H-shift, C-N bond formation and water elimination, and intramolecular cyclization and water elimination. The rate-determining step is the nucleophilic attack process. Moreover, we also explored the effect of nucleophilic attack of the nitrogen of (4-methoxyphenyl)methanamine on hydroxyl or carbonyl group carbon of phthalaldehydic acid on the activation energy. More importantly, we found that water molecules play a critical role in the whole reaction, not only act as solvent but also as an efficient catalyst, proton shuttle, and stabilizer to stabilize the structures of transition states and intermediates via π···H-O, O···H-N, O···H-C, and O···H-O interactions. The origin of the different reactivity of M1 and M2 is ascribed to the pivotal noncovalent interactions exist between catalyst (water and substrate 2) and reactants. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mechanistic insight on (E)-methyl 3-(2-aminophenyl)acrylate cyclization reaction by multicatalysis of solvent and substrate

The reaction mechanism of (E)-methyl 3-(2-aminophenyl)acrylate (A) with phenylisothiocyanate (B) as well as the vital roles of substrate A and solvent water were investigated under unassisted, water-assisted, substrate A-assisted, and water-A-assisted conditions. The reaction proceeds with four processes via nucleophilic addition, deprotonation and protonation, intramolecular cyclization with hydrogen transfer, and keto-enol tautomerization. According to the different H-shift mode, two possible types of H-shift P1 and P2 are carefully investigated to identify the most preferred pathway, differing in the NH2 group deprotonation and CH group of A protonation processes. It is found that substrate A and water not only act as reactant and solvent, but also as catalyst, proton shuttle, and stabilizer in effectively lowering the energy barrier. Therefore, the results demonstrate that the strong donating and accepting ability of NH2 group on A and the presence of bulk water are the keys to the title reaction proceed. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.