Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio outweigh fibrosis index based on four factors and red cell distribution width-platelet ratio in diagnosing liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis B

Non-Invasive Monitoring of the Impact of Low-Level Viremia on Liver Fibrosis in Treated Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Background

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) presents a global health challenge due to its potential to cause severe liver conditions such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis. Prior research has established a correlation between CHB infection with low-level viremia (LLV) and liver disease progression, such as increased HCC incidence. This study aims to investigate whether LLV during treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) contributes to the accelerated progression of liver fibrosis (LF).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study at Jinhua Central Hospital focused on CHB patients undergone NA monotherapy for over 96 weeks. Patients were categorized into maintained virological response (MVR) and LLV groups based on hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels. The study assessed LF using various markers and methods, including chitinase 3-like 1 protein (CHI3L1), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, and transient elastography.

Results

Analysis was conducted on 92 CHB patients, categorized into LLV (n=42) and MVR (n=50) groups, following the exclusion of 101 patients for various reasons. Significant findings included lower baseline HBV DNA in MVR (<20 IU/mL) compared to LLV (67.8 IU/mL, P<0.001) and different AST/ALT ratios (LLV: 1.1, MVR: 1.36, P=0.011). LF was assessed using CHI3L1, FIB-4, and APRI, with LLV showing a higher baseline CHI3L1 (LLV:83.3 ng/mL vs MVR: 54.5 ng/mL, P=0.016) and scores compared to MVR, indicative of fibrosis. CHI3L1 levels in LLV were higher at baseline and weeks 48, 72, and 96 than MVR, with significance at baseline (P=0.038) and week 48 (P=0.034). Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) showed a time-dependent decline in both groups but no significant intergroup differences.

Conclusion

Non-invasive monitoring of CHB patients who have received treatment indicates that LLV contributes to the progression of LF, necessitating proactive adjustment of antiviral treatment strategies.

A New Assessment of Two Transferase-Based Liver Enzymes in Low- and High-Fibrosis Patients Chronically Infected with Hepatitis B Virus: A Meta-Analysis and Pilot Study

Background: The detection of fibrosis remains a necessity for the evaluation of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients, but the most accurate technique is invasive. Current studies aim to develop a novel noninvasive biomarker for fibrosis assessment, but no-one has found the ideal candidate. This study is a meta-analysis combined with a pilot study to investigate the connection between two transferase compounds and the levels of fibrosis. Methods: We studied data from PUBMED, Web of Science, and Scopus, retrieving 28,896 articles. Following PRISMA guidelines, we finally analyzed full-text articles written in English. The excluded items were duplicates, non-article entries, and irrelevant papers. We assessed the variations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels between patients with high and low levels of fibrosis. Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used to assess article quality. We used R 4.2.2 for statistics. The pilot study included 14 randomly chosen patients with different fibrosis levels. Results: We found significant differences in ALT and GGT levels between patients with high and low fibrosis. The GGT/ALT ratio correlated with the levels of fibrosis and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score. Conclusions: This meta-analysis assessed ALT and GGT levels in chronic HBV patients with fibrosis. The pilot study identified the first association between fibrosis and the GGT/ALT ratio in a Romanian cohort of chronic patients. This brings new ideas for future research.

Lifestyle factors modified the mediation role of liver fibrosis in the association between occupational physical activity and blood pressure

Objectives

The study aimed to estimate the role of liver fibrosis in the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and blood pressure (BP), which is modified by lifestyle factors.

Methods

The questionnaire survey and physical examination were completed among 992 construction workers in Wuhan, China. Associations between OPA or lifestyle factors and liver fibrosis indices and blood pressure were assessed using generalized additive models. The mediation analysis was used to evaluate the role of liver fibrosis in the association between OPA and lifestyle factors and BP.

Results

Moderate/high OPA group workers had an increased risk of liver fibrosis [odds ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.16-2.47, P < 0.05] compared with low OPA group workers. Smoking or drinking alcohol was related to liver fibrosis (aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index: OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07-4.62 or OR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.00-4.15; P < 0.05). Compared with non-drinkers, drinkers were related to a 2.35-mmHg increase in systolic blood pressure (95% CI: 0.09-4.61), and a 1.60-mmHg increase in diastolic blood pressure (95% CI: 0.08-3.13; P < 0.05). We found a significant pathway, "OPA → liver fibrosis → blood pressure elevation," and lifestyle factors played a regulatory role in the pathway.

Conclusion

OPA or lifestyle factors were associated with liver fibrosis indices or BP in construction workers. Furthermore, the association between OPA and BP may be partially mediated by liver fibrosis; lifestyle factors strengthen the relationship between OPA and BP and the mediation role of liver fibrosis in the relationship.

Serum Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase-to-Platelet Ratio as a Noninvasive Marker of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

Background The gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)-to-platelet ratio (GPR) is identified as a new model for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of GPR for the prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. Methods In an observational cohort study, patients with CHB were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of GPR was compared with transient elastography (TE), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores for the prediction of liver fibrosis using liver histology as a gold standard. Results Forty-eight patients with CHB with a mean age of 33.42 ± 15.72 years were enrolled. Liver histology showed meta-analysis of histological data in viral hepatitis (METAVIR) stage F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 fibrosis in 11, 12, 11, seven, and seven patients, respectively. The Spearman correlation of METAVIR fibrosis stage with APRI, FIB-4, GPR, and TE were 0.354, 0.402, 0.551, and 0.726, respectively (P value < 0.05). TE had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) (80%, 83%, 83%, and 79%, respectively), followed by GPR (76%, 65%, 70%, and 71%, respectively) for predicting significant fibrosis (≥F2). However, TE had comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV with GPR (86%, 82%, 42%, and 93%, and 86%, 71%, 42%, and 92%, respectively) for predicting extensive fibrosis (≥F3). Conclusion The performance of GPR is comparable to TE in predicting significant and extensive liver fibrosis. GPR may be an acceptable, low-cost alternative for predicting compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) (F3-F4) in CHB patients.

Red cell distribution width to serum albumin ratio as an early prognostic marker for severe acute pancreatitis: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The ability to predict severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) at an early stage is crucial for reducing the associated complications and mortality. In this study, we compared the ratio of red cell distribution width to albumin (RDW-to-ALB) using predictive scoring systems, such as the Ranson score, BISAP, and MCTSI, to develop a simple and accurate method of predicting SAP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 212 patients with mild acute pancreatitis (MAP) and 89 with SAP between January 2013 and December 2018. The differences in the general characteristics and biochemical analysis as well as the various predictive scores were compared between the two groups. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity between the RDW-to-ALB ratio, RDW, ALB, and multiple predictive scores in patients with early acute pancreatitis (AP) by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The RDW-to-ALB ratio (%) of patients with SAP was higher than that of patients with MAP (0.43 ± 0.08 vs. 0.32 ± 0.04, p < 0.001). Patients with SAP had higher Ranson, BISAP, and MCTSI scores than those with MAP. The ROC curve revealed that, when the RDW-to-ALB ratio (%) was >0.36, the sensitivity and specificity of the predicted SAP were 80.0% and 80.7%, respectively. Further statistical analysis found that the RDW-to-ALB ratio and Ranson, BISAP, and MCTSI scores were consistent in predicting SAP effectiveness (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The RDW-to-ALB ratio has a promising predictive power for SAP, and its effectiveness is comparable with those of Ranson, BISAP, and MCTSI scores.

Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase-to-Platelet ratio predicts liver fibrosis in patients with concomitant chronic hepatitis B and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the correlation of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index-4 (FIB-4), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, and perform a diagnostic value of GPR for predicting fibrosis in CHB patients with NAFLD.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on CHB patients concurrent with NAFLD between September 2019 and December 2020. They were divided into control group (LSM ≤ 9.7 kpa) and fibrosis group (LSM ≥ 9.8 kpa). Demographic data were collected; ALT, AST, and PLT were also detected. LSM was measured by transient elastography (TE). The GPR, APRI, and FIB-4 were calculated. The correlation between GPR, APRI, FIB-4, and LSM was compared. The accuracy of predicting liver fibrosis using GPR, APRI, and FIB-4 was assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-five CHB patients with NAFLD were enrolled. Multivariate analysis showed that age (p = 0.005), GGT (p = 0.001), and PLT (p = 0.013) were the independent risk factors for LSM. The GPR (p = 0.008), APRI (p = 0.001), and FIB-4 (p = 0.001) values in fibrosis group were higher than control group. Pearson linear correlation was used to analyze the correlations between LSM and GPR, APRI, and FIB-4. LSM was correlated with GPR, APRI, and FIB-4. The AUCs of GPR, APRI, and FIB4 were 0.805, 0.766, and 0.826 in assessing liver fibrosis, respectively. No significant differences in the areas of GPR were comparable to that of APRI and FIB-4.

CONCLUSION

GPR has a good correlation with LSM in assessing liver fibrosis and can be used as a noninvasive index for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with concomitant CHB and NAFLD.

Comparison of two-dimensional shear wave elastography, magnetic resonance elastography, and three serum markers for diagnosing fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4), and King's score have been proposed for diagnosing fibrosis.

METHODS

Literature databases were searched until October 1st, 2020. The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratios, and the summary sensitivities and specificities were used to assess the performance of these noninvasive methods for staging fibrosis.

RESULTS

Our final data contained 72 studies. The prevalence of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 58.3%, 36.2%, and 20.5%, respectively, in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). For 2D-SWE and MRE, the summary AUROCs were 0.89 and 0.97, 0.95 and 0.97, and 0.94 and 0.97 for significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, respectively. The summary AUROCs using APRI and FIB-4 for detecting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.76 and 0.75, 0.74 and 0.77, and 0.77 and 0.82, respectively. The summary AUROCs of King's score for detecting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.77 and 0.83, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRE and 2D-SWE may show the best diagnostic accuracy for predicting fibrosis in CHB. Among the three serum markers, King's score may be more useful for diagnosing fibrosis.

Platelets level variability during the first year after liver transplantation in the risk prediction model for recipients mortality

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Many scoring systems in liver diseases use static values of liver function parameters. These parameters may change significantly in liver transplant (LTx) recipients over time due to various processes. The study was aimed at building a new model for survival prediction after LTx based on variability of selected parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 450 LTx recipients who survived a minimum one year after transplantation. We analyzed liver enzymes and hematology parameters static values and their variability during the first year after transplantation. Modeling patients' survival was performed using Cox regression. Various sets of parameters (both static and variability and trends values) were tested to predict survival in our study group. Models' performance was measured using the concordance index.

RESULTS

The single predictors of the patients survival were the static values of AST with C-index 0.706 (0.5883-0.7494), ALT 0.6102 (0.4843-0.6857) and bilirubin 0.6224 (0.5537-0.6695). High prediction scores were observed for variability in creatinine 0.6023 (0.5409-0.6451), PLT 0.6350 (0.5491-0.7043), RBC 0.5689 (0.5065-0.6213) and WBC 0.6506 (0.5095-0.7124). Our best-fitted and proposed model for patients survival after LTx has C-index 0.8273 (IQR 0.7767-0.8649). The model uses the following indicators for mortality prediction: the static value of AST, variability measure of PLT and trend measures of WBC and PLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding variability and trend measures increases predictive accuracy in modeling patients survival after LTx. We propose a high-accuracy survival model in which variability and trend of PLT measures in the first year after transplantation are strong predictors of long-term mortality.

High-dimensional hepatopath data analysis by machine learning for predicting HBV-related fibrosis

Chronic HBV infection, the main cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, has become a global health concern. Machine learning algorithms are particularly adept at analyzing medical phenomenon by capturing complex and nonlinear relationships in clinical data. Our study proposed a predictive model on the basis of 55 routine laboratory and clinical parameters by machine learning algorithms as a novel non-invasive method for liver fibrosis diagnosis. The model was further evaluated on the accuracy and rationality and proved to be highly accurate and efficient for the prediction of HBV-related fibrosis. In conclusion, we suggested a potential combination of high-dimensional clinical data and machine learning predictive algorithms for the liver fibrosis diagnosis.

Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases

Objective: The easy liver fibrosis test (eLIFT) is a novel predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in CLD patients. Methods: We enrolled 1125 patients with CLD who underwent liver biopsy. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis of the eLIFT was assessed and compared to that of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of the eLIFT for assessing liver inflammation G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.77 (0.75-0.80) and 0.81 (0.79-0.84), with cut-offs of 8.0 and 11.0, respectively. The AUROCs of the eLIFT for predicting fibrosis stages S ≥ 2 and S4 were 0.72 (0.70-0.76) and 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with cut-offs of 9.0 and 10.0, respectively. In discriminating G≥2 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was better than that of the FIB-4, with no difference compared with the GPR, but lower than that of the APRI. When discriminating G≥3 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was comparable to that of the APRI and GPR but superior to that of the FIB-4. There were no significant differences between the four indexes for predicting S≥2 and S4. Conclusion: The eLIFT is a potentially useful noninvasive predictor of liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with CLD.

Predictive Performances of Blood Parameter Ratios for Liver Inflammation and Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

OBJECTIVE

Blood parameter ratios, including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), have been reported that they are correlated to the progression of liver disease. This study is aimed at evaluating the predictive value of PLR, NLR, and MLR for liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We recruited 457 patients with CHB who underwent a liver biopsy and routine laboratory tests. Liver histology was assessed according to the Scheuer scoring system. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

PLR and NLR presented significantly reverse correlation to liver inflammation and fibrosis. However, these correlations were not observed for MLR and liver histology. The AUROCs of PLR for assessing G2-3 and G3 were 0.676 and 0.705 with cutoffs 74.27 and 68.75, respectively. The AUROCs of NLR in predicting inflammatory scores G2-3 and G3 were 0.616 and 0.569 with cutoffs 1.36 and 1.85, respectively. The AUROCs of PLR for evaluating fibrosis stages S3-4 and S4 were 0.723 and 0.757 with cutoffs 79.67 and 74.27, respectively. The AUROCs of NLR for evaluating fibrosis stages S3-4 and S4 were 0.590 with cutoff 1.14.

CONCLUSION

Although PLR has similar predictive power of progressive liver fibrosis compared with APRI, FIB-4, and GPR in CHB patients, it has the advantage of less cost and easy application with the potential to be widely used in clinical practice.

Comparison and evaluation of non-invasive models in predicting liver inflammation and fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients with high hepatitis B virus DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels

Few studies have paid attention to the performances of non-invasive models in diagnosing stages of liver fibrosis and inflammation, which are critical for early and accurate assessment of prognostication and decisions on antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis B infection patients with high hepatitis B virus DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels (≤2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)). This study aimed to investigate the value of routine serum markers in evaluation of liver inflammation and fibrosis in these patients.A total of 370 consecutive chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients who underwent liver biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. The Scheuer scoring system was adopted as the pathological standard for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis. The receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC) and the area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were used to analyze the performances of the models, including aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4), red cell volume distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR), globulin-platelet model (GP), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio index (GPR).To predict significant inflammation (G ≥2), the AUROC of APRI was higher than that of FIB-4 (0.705 vs 0.629, P = .001), RPR (0.705 vs 0.593, P < .001) and GP (0.705 vs 0.620, P = .002), equivalent to that of GPR (0.705 vs 0.690, P = .606). As for severe inflammation (≥G3) and significant fibrosis (≥S2), there was no statistic difference among them. To predict severe fibrosis (≥ S3), the AUROC of FIB-4 was higher than that of RPR (0.805 vs 0.750, P = .006) and GP (0.805 vs 0.755, P = .046), comparable to that of APRI (0.805 vs 0.785, P = .550) and GPR (0.805 vs 0.818, P = .694). As for significant liver histological changes (G ≥ 2 or/and S ≥ 2), the performance of APRI was higher than that of RPR (0.717 vs 0.652, P = .006), GP (0.717 vs 0.659, p = .011), equivalent to that of FIB-4 (0.717 vs 0.692, P = .254) and GPR (0.717 vs 0.680, P = .166).We found that APRI, GPR, and FIB-4 were more effective than RPR and GP for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis.

Red cell distribution width to platelet ratio for liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy

Introduction: Red cell distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR) may be a useful marker for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). We sought to investigate its value in fibrosis-related outcomes in a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Areas covered: We searched MEDLINE (1966-2019), Clinicaltrials.gov (2008-2019), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (1999-2019), Google Scholar (2004-2019) and WHO (International Clinical Trials Register Platform) databases using a structured algorithm. The articles were assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2). In over 1,800 patients for each outcome, pooled sensitivity and specificity for a) significant fibrosis, b) advanced fibrosis and c) cirrhosis were: a) 0.635 and 0.769 with an AUC of 0.747, b) 0.607 and 0.783 with an AUC of 0.773, c) 0.739 and 0.768 with an AUC of 0.818 respectively. Similar results were found for chronic hepatitis B in all outcomes. Subgroup analysis indicated a high specificity for advanced fibrosis detection in primary biliary cirrhosis. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the results. Expert opinion: RPR is a good predictor of fibrosis, especially as severity of chronic liver disease progresses. Future research should elucidate its value in specific etiologies of chronic liver disease.

Performance of common imaging techniques vs serum biomarkers in assessing fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive biomarkers have been developed to predict hepatitis B virus (HBV) related fibrosis owing to the significant limitations of liver biopsy. Both serum biomarkers and imaging techniques have shown promising results and may improve the evaluation of liver fibrosis. However, most of the previous studies focused on the diagnostic effects of various imaging techniques on fibrosis in all chronic liver diseases.

AIM

To compare the performance of common imaging methods and serum biomarkers for prediction of significant fibrosis caused only by HBV infection.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on the records available in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases until December 2018. We systematically assessed the effectiveness of two serum biomarkers and three imagine techniques in predicting significant fibrosis solely caused by HBV infection. The serum biomarkers included aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4). The three imaging techniques included acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), FibroScan, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Three parameters, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary sensitivity and specificity, were used to examine the accuracy of all tests for liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

Out of 2831 articles evaluated for eligibility, 204 satisfied the predetermined inclusion criteria for this current meta-analysis. Eventually, our final data contained 81 studies. The AUSROCs of serum biomarkers of APRI and FIB-4 were both 0.75. For imaging techniques (ARFI, FibroScan, and MRE), the areas were 0.89, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively. The heterogeneities of ARFI and FibroScan were statistically significant (I² > 50%). The publication bias was not observed in any of the serum biomarkers or imaging methods.

CONCLUSION

These five methods have attained an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy. Imaging techniques, MRE in particular, demonstrate significant advantages in accurately predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, while serum biomarkers are admissible methods.

Evaluation and comparison of the diagnostic performance of routine blood tests in predicting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B infection

Background & aims: Biopsy is the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis, but it may be accompanied by complications. As an alternative, non-invasive markers such as transient elastography (for liver fibrosis) and certain combinations of routine blood markers (liver function tests, full blood count) have been developed although their clinical significance remains controversial. Here, we compare the diagnostic values of non-invasive markers for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. Methods: Transient elastography and routine laboratory tests were performed in 196 patients. Diagnostic performances were compared and were assessed based on the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Elevated GGT to platelet ratio (GPR), the fibrosis index FIB-4 [based on age, AST, platelets and ALT], platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and total bilirubin were independent predictors of liver stiffness defined by transient elastography (all P < 0.001). The AUCs of GPR in predicting both advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were significantly larger than that of FIB-4 (P = 0.037 and P = 0.008, respectively) and AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) (P = 0.008 and P = 0.005). FIB-4, APRI and red cell volume distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR) had similar diagnostic values in discriminating different levels of liver fibrosis. Conclusions: GPR showed the best diagnostic value and RPR and PLR are easily available and inexpensive markers in evaluating fibrosis and cirrhosis. The diagnostic values of these laboratory markers are useful in diagnosing advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, and in confirming the different levels of liver fibrosis.

Preoperative D-dimer and Gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase Predict Major Complications and Survival in Colorectal Liver Metastases Patients After Resection

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictive value of the pre-operative D-dimer and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) for the prognosis in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients after hepatic resection. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-two patients between December 2008 and December 2016 and 101 patients at our center from January 2017 to December 2018 were selected as a training set and validation set, respectively. The combination of the pre-operative D-dimer and GGT status (CPDG score) was scored as follows: elevated D-dimer levels with elevated GGT levels was allocated a score of 2, decreased D-dimer levels with decreased GGT levels was allocated a score of 0, and all other combinations were allocated a score of 1. In the training set, a logistic regression was applied to explore potential predictors of major postoperative complications. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to analyze survival. We further verified our findings in the validation set. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 43 (14.7%) and 25 (24.8%) patients in the training set and validation set, respectively. In the training set, multivariate analysis showed that elevated GGT levels and elevated D-dimer levels independently predicted major complications respectively. In the multivariate analyses, elevated pre-operative D-dimer levels remained independently associated with decreased overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.751, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.139-2.691, P = .01). The CPDG score was an independent prognostic factor for major complications and OS in the multivariate analyses. The predictive ability of the CPDG score was higher than either factor alone. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that compared with patients with CPDG score = 1 or CPDG score = 0, patients with a CPDG score = 2 had worsened OS. Furthermore, for OS comparisons, the differences between any two groups were significant. In the validation set, elevated GGT and D-dimer were also suggested to predict worse progression-free survival (PFS) and to be independently associated with major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-operative D-dimer levels, GGT levels and CPDG score are reliable biomarkers to predict post-operative major complications or survival in CRLM patients after hepatic resection, which make it useful for CRLM patients in guiding surveillance approaches and prognosis assessments.

Diagnostic accuracy of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio for predicting hepatitis B-related fibrosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Emerging published data on the accuracy of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) for diagnosing hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related fibrosis are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the performance of GPR for diagnosing HBV-related significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE was conducted before July 2018. Study selection was performed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The relevant parameters of eligible studies were abstracted. The methodological quality was assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Areas under summary receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratios were used to examine the GPR accuracy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies including 5882 patients with HBV infection underwent liver biopsy were incorporated. The prevalence of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 58% (range: 22-72%), 36% (range: 10-55%), and 19% (range: 2-33%), respectively. Areas under summary receiver operating characteristic curves of GPR for predicting significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.733, 0.777, and 0.796, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed according to geographical region and histological scoring system with similar results.

CONCLUSION

GPR has moderate diagnostic accuracy for predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis, and further studies with large sample size, rigorous design, multicenter study population are urgently needed.

Optimisation of the use of APRI and FIB-4 to rule out cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: results from the SONIC-B study

BACKGROUND

Ruling out the presence of cirrhosis is important for the management of chronic hepatitis B. We aimed to study and optimise the performance of two non-invasive indices for ruling out cirrhosis: the aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis score based on four factors (FIB-4).

METHODS

We applied established cutoffs to rule in (APRI >2·00; FIB-4 >3·25) or rule out (APRI <1·00; FIB-4 <1·45) cirrhosis to data from eight global randomised trials that required baseline biopsy, and identified new cutoffs aiming for a sensitivity for detection of cirrhosis greater than 90% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of greater than 95% in the same dataset. We externally validated the new cutoffs using data from all consecutive biopsied patients from two tertiary referral hospitals in the Netherlands and Canada.

FINDINGS

In the derivation dataset (n=2926; of whom 1750 were Asian); 340 (12%) individuals had cirrhosis. The validation cohort consisted of 1034 individuals (of whom 575 were Asian), with 155 (15%) individuals with cirrhosis. Application of conventional cutoffs for FIB-4 in the derivation dataset yielded unclassifiable results in 686 (23%) individuals, and 139 (41%) of the 340 patients with cirrhosis were misclassified as having no cirrhosis. Similarly, conventional cutoffs for APRI in the derivation dataset yielded unclassifiable results in 706 (24%) individuals, and 153 (45%) were misclassified as having no cirrhosis. An APRI of 0·45 or less had sensitivity of 91·5%, an NPV of 95·4%, and misclassified 29 (9%) of 340 individuals with cirrhosis in the derivation dataset, but performance was reduced in the validation set (22 [14%] of 155 individuals with cirrhosis misclassified). A FIB-4 score of 0·70 had a sensitivity of 90·9%, an NPV of 96·6%, and misclassified 31 (9%) of individuals with cirrhosis in the derivation dataset. In the validation cohort, the same score gave a sensitivity of 94·2%, an NPV of 97·3%, and misclassified nine (6%) of the individuals with cirrhosis. Subgroup analysis indicated that the new FIB-4 cutoff performed acceptably in all subgroups except for individuals aged 30 years or younger.

INTERPRETATION

Conventional cutoffs for APRI and FIB-4 should not be used to guide management of patients with chronic hepatitis B due to high rates of misclassification. A newly identified and externally validated cutoff for FIB-4 (≤0·70) can be used to exclude cirrhosis in patients over 30 years of age.

FUNDING

Foundation for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Diagnostic accuracy of red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio for predicting staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Red cell volume distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR), as a novel noninvasive assessment, is frequently investigated. However, the utility of RPR to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of RPR for detecting staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of RPR. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were also performed to identify factors that contributed to heterogeneity. The Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was applied to assess the quality.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies with a total of 3346 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The area under the curve for SROC to summarize diagnostic accuracy of RPR for prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 0.73 (standard error [SE] = 0.02), 0.83 (SE = 0.03), and 0.85 (SE = 0.04), respectively. Pooled DOR with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 4.93 (95% CI: 3.78-6.43), 10.27 (95% CI: 6.26-16.84), and 12.16 (95% CI: 5.85-25.28), respectively, using a random effects model. Meta-regression showed that length of liver biopsy specimen potentially contributed to heterogeneity. There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic liver disease patients, RPR presented a good performance for prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. More future trials are required for prospective validation.

A new combined predicting model using a non-invasive score for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients presenting with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

OBJECTIVES

Several non-invasive markers have recently been proposed to predict liver fibrosis without percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB). We aimed to evaluate the performance of non-invasive scores and to highlight the value of a new combined score in the prediction of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients presenting with CHB who underwent PLB between 2008 and 2016. We calculated ASAT/Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 Score (FIB4), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), and ASAT/ALAT Ratio (AAR). Then, we combined APRI and FIB-4 scores into a new combined score. We assessed their performance in predicting liver fibrosis according to the Metavir score.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients presenting with CHB were included. Multivariate analysis showed that the APRI score was the only independent factor of significant fibrosis (OR=3.78; P=0.02), whereas the FIB-4 score was the only independent factor for severe fibrosis (OR=2.85; P<0.001) and cirrhosis (OR=2.5; P=0.001). At a threshold of severe fibrosis, APRI had the best specificity (75%) and FIB-4 had the greatest sensitivity (74%). Using the combined score, we improved the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 scores at the three thresholds of liver fibrosis. With this combined score, maximum 25.1% of patients presenting with CHB would undergo PLB.

CONCLUSION

APRI, FIB-4, and GPR scores were well performing to predict liver fibrosis during CHB. The new combined score using APRI and FIB-4 was more accurate at the three-fibrosis thresholds.

Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio outweigh fibrosis index based on four factors and red cell distribution width-platelet ratio in diagnosing liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The benefits of using serum markers to diagnose stages of liver disease in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients are controversial. We conducted a study to compare the clinical significance of four markers in evaluating liver inflammation and fibrosis in CHB patients.

METHODS

A total of 323 treatment-naive CHB patients who received a liver biopsy and routine laboratory testing were enrolled in our study. We used the Scheuer scoring system as a pathological standard for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis. The diagnostic performance of the fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4), the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), and the red cell distribution width-platelet ratio (RPR) were analyzed with receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC).

RESULTS

No significant differences among the four indexes for diagnosing significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2) was found, while APRI and GPR were superior to FIB-4 and RPR in diagnosing moderate (G ≥ 2), severe (G ≥ 3) inflammation, and severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3). The AUROCs for diagnosing G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.732 and 0.861 for APRI, 0.726 and0.883 for GPR, 0.703 and0.705 for FIB-4, and 0.660 and 0.747 for RPR, respectively. The AUROCs for diagnosing S ≥ 2 and S ≥ 3 were0.724 and 0.799 for APRI, 0.714 and0.801 for GPR, 0.683 and0.730 for FIB-4, and 0.643 and 0.705 for RPR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

APRI and GPR were more effective than FIB-4 and RPR at diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis.