Identification of and solution for false D-dimer results

Heterophilic antibodies leading to falsely positive D-dimer concentration in an adolescent

Background

We present the case of a 15-year-old adolescent with suspected pulmonary embolism and repeatedly elevated D-dimer levels.

Key Clinical Question

We aim to determine the cause for elevated D-dimer levels in a patient without venous thromboembolism.

Clinical Approach

When the D-dimer measurement was repeated with different assays, D-dimer levels were within the normal reference interval. Dilution series with assay diluent or low-affinity antibody blocking reagents either did not or only partially decreased the D-dimer value using the original reagent kit.

Conclusion

Analyses suggested the presence of interfering heterophilic antibodies in patient plasma, a known phenomenon with immunoturbidimetric D-dimer assays, which is rarely described. Prior to drawing this conclusion, the patient underwent extensive diagnostic testing, which led to uncertainty and discomfort for the health care providers, the patient, and their family.

Falsely elevated D-dimer partially caused by heterophilic antibodies: A case report

Plasma D-dimer is a screening marker for thrombosis and hemostasis disorders. Falsely elevated D-dimer may result in misdiagnosis and potentially invasive investigations. Therefore, identifying falsely elevated D-dimer is of great value in laboratory practice. D-dimer is determined by immunoassay and vulnerable to heterophilic antibody interference. Here, we reported a case of falsely elevated D-dimer partially caused by heterophilic antibodies. Dilution test, polyethylene glycol precipitation, heterophilic blocking reagent and method comparison were used to identify the heterophilic antibody interference. All these methods, except for the heterophilic blocking reagent, revealed the existence of heterophilic antibody interference. Polyethylene glycol precipitation failed to reduce the D-dimer to its reference interval. Therefore, we conclude that the falsely elevated D-dimer is partially caused by heterophilic antibody interference.

Identification of and solution for false D-dimer results

BACKGROUND

Clinically, D-dimer (DD) levels are mainly used to exclude diseases such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In clinical testing, DD assays can be subjected to interference that may cause false results, which directly affect the clinical diagnosis. Our hypothesis was that the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the fibrin degradation product (FDP)/DD and fibrinogen (Fib)/DD ratios were used to identify these false results and corrected via multiple dilutions.

METHODS

In total, 16 776 samples were divided into three groups according to the DD levels detected by Sysmex CS5100 and CA7000: Group A, DD ≥ 2.0 μg/mL fibrinogen equivalent unit (FEU); group B, 0.5 < DD < 2.0 μg/mL FEU; and group C, DD ≤ 0.5 μg/mL FEU. The 95% CIs of the FDP/DD and Fib/DD ratios were calculated. Six abnormal DD results were found according to the 95% CIs. For verification, we performed multiple dilutions, compared the results with those of other instruments, and tested the addition of heterophilic blocking reagent (HBR).

RESULTS

The median and 95% CI of the FDP/DD ratio were 3.76 and 2.25-8.15 in group A, 5.63 and 2.86-10.58 in group B, 10.23 and 0.91-47.71 in groups C, respectively. For the Fib/DD ratio, the 95% CIs was 0.02-2.21 in group A, 0.68-8.15 in group B, and 3.82-55.27 in groups C. Six abnormal results were identified after multiple dilutions, by comparison with other detection systems, and after HBR addition.

CONCLUSIONS

The FDP/DD ratio is more reliable for identifying false results. If the FDP/DD ratio falls outside the 95% CI, it should be verified by different methods.