Critical protein domains and amino acid residues for gating the KIR6.2 channel by intracellular ATP

Kir6.2 channel gating by intracellular protons: subunit stoichiometry for ligand binding and channel gating

The adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channels are gated by several metabolites, whereas the gating mechanism remains unclear. Kir6.2, a pore-forming subunit of the K(ATP) channels, has all machineries for ligand binding and channel gating. In Kir6.2, His175 is the protonation site and Thr71 and Cys166 are involved in channel gating. Here, we show how individual subunits act in proton binding and channel gating by selectively disrupting functional subunits using these residues. All homomeric dimers and tetramers showed pH sensitivity similar to the monomeric channels. Concatenated construction of wild type with disrupted subunits revealed that none of these residues had a dominant-negative effect on the proton-dependent channel gating. Subunit action in proton binding was almost identical to that for channel gating involving Cys166, suggesting a one-to-one coupling from the C terminus to the M2 helix. This was significantly different from the effect of T71Y heteromultimers, suggesting distinct contributions of M1 and M2 helices to channel gating. Subunits underwent concerted rather than independent action. Two wild-type subunits appeared to act as a functional dimer in both cis and trans configurations. The understanding of K(ATP) channel gating by intracellular pH has a profound impact on cellular responses to metabolic stress as a significant drop in intracellular pH is more frequently seen under a number of physiological and pathophysiological conditions than a sole decrease in intracellular ATP levels.

Subunit-stoichiometric evidence for kir6.2 channel gating, ATP binding, and binding-gating coupling

ATP-sensitive K(+) channels are gated by intracellular ATP, allowing them to couple intermediary metabolism to cellular excitability, whereas the gating mechanism remains unclear. To understand subunit stoichiometry for the ATP-dependent channel gating, we constructed tandem-multimeric Kir6.2 channels by selective disruption of the binding or gating mechanism in certain subunits. Stepwise disruptions of channel gating caused graded losses in ATP sensitivity and increases in basal P(open), with no effect on maximum ATP inhibition. Prevention of ATP binding lowered the ATP sensitivity and maximum inhibition without affecting basal P(open). The ATP-dependent gating required a minimum of two functional subunits. Two adjacent subunits are more favorable for ATP binding than two diagonal ones. Subunits showed negative cooperativity in ATP binding and positive cooperativity in channel gating. Joint disruptions of the binding and gating mechanisms in the same or alternate subunits of a concatemer revealed that both intra- and intersubunit couplings contributed to channel gating, although the binding-gating coupling preferred the intrasubunit to intersubunit configuration within the C terminus. No such preference was found between the C and N termini. These phenomena are well-described with the operational model used widely for ligand-receptor interactions.

Determinant role of membrane helices in K ATP channel gating

The ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channels couple chemical signals to cellular activity, in which the control of channel opening and closure (i.e., channel gating) is crucial. Transmembrane helices play an important role in channel gating. Here we report that the gating of Kir6.2, the core subunit of pancreatic and cardiac K(ATP) channels, can be switched by manipulating the interaction between two residues located in transmembrane domains (TM) 1 and 2 of the channel protein. The Kir6.2 channel is gated by ATP and proton, which inhibit and activate the channel, respectively. The channel gating involves two residues, namely, Thr71 and Cys166, located at the interface of the TM1 and TM2. Creation of electrostatic attraction between these sites reverses the channel gating, which makes the ATP an activator and proton an inhibitor of the channel. Electrostatic repulsion with two acidic residues retains or even enhances the wild-type channel gating. A similar switch of the pH-dependent channel gating was observed in the Kir2.1 channel, which is normally pH- insensitive. Thus, the manner in which the TM1 and TM2 helices interact appears to determine whether the channels are open or closed following ligand binding.