Factor Xa Signaling Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Diseases

A snake venom-analog peptide that inhibits SARS-CoV-2 and papain-like protease displays antithrombotic activity in mice arterial thrombosis model, without interfering with bleeding time

BACKGROUND

(p-BthTX-I)₂ K, a dimeric analog peptide derived from the C-terminal region of phospholipase A2-like bothropstoxin-I (p-BthTX-I), is resistant to plasma proteolysis and inhibits severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains with weak cytotoxic effects. Complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection include vascular problems and increased risk of thrombosis; therefore, studies to identify new drugs for treating SARS-CoV-2 infections that also inhibit thrombosis and minimize the risk of bleeding are required.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether (p-BthTX-I)₂ K affects the hemostatic system.

METHODS

Platelet aggregation was induced by collagen, arachidonic acid, and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the Chronolog Lumi-aggregometer. The coagulation activity was evaluated by determining activated partial thromboplastin clotting time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) with (p-BthTX-I)₂ K (5.0-434.5 µg) or 0.9% NaCl. Arterial thrombosis was induced with a 540 nm laser and 3.5-20 mg kg^- 1 Rose Bengal in the carotid artery of male C57BL/6J mice using (p-BthTX-I)₂ K. Bleeding time was determined in mouse tails immersed in saline at 37 °C after (p-BthTX-I)₂ K (4.0 mg/kg and 8.0 mg/kg) or saline administration.

RESULTS

(p-BthTX-I)₂ K prolonged the aPTT and PT by blocking kallikrein and FXa-like activities. Moreover, (p-BthTX-I)₂ K inhibited ADP-, collagen-, and arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent manner. Further, low concentrations of (p-BthTX-I)₂ K extended the time to artery occlusion by the formed thrombus. However, (p-BthTX-I)₂ K did not prolong the bleeding time in the mouse model of arterial thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the antithrombotic activity of the peptide (p-BthTX-I)₂ K possibly by kallikrein inhibition, suggesting its strong biotechnological potential.

Biomaterials as Haemostatic Agents in Cardiovascular Surgery: Review of Current Situation and Future Trends

Intraoperative haemostasis is of paramount importance in the practice of cardiovascular surgery. Over the past 70 years, topical haemostatic methods have advanced significantly and today we deal with various haemostatic agents with different properties and different mechanisms of action. The particularity of coagulation mechanisms after extracorporeal circulation, has encouraged the introduction of new types of topic agents to achieve haemostasis, where conventional methods prove their limits. These products have an important role in cardiac, as well as in vascular, surgery, mainly in major vascular procedures, like aortic dissections and aortic aneurysms. This article presents those agents used for topical application and the mechanism of haemostasis and offers general recommendations for their use in the operating room.

Activated Blood Coagulation Factor X (FXa) Contributes to the Development of Traumatic PVR Through Promoting RPE Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Purpose

Uncontrolled coagulation reactions contribute to pathological fibroproliferation in several organs, and yet their role in proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains to be elucidated. In this study, we evaluated the profibrotic effects of FXa in RPE cells and in a mouse model of PVR.

Methods

FXa levels in the eyes of traumatic PVR patients and rabbit models of mechanical ocular trauma was measured by ELISA and immunohistochemistry. FXa-induced RPE EMT was assessed by examining cell proliferation, migration, tight junction changes, and expression of fibrotic markers. For in vivo study, FXa was injected into dispase-injured eyes, then intraocular fibrosis was evaluated by histological analysis and Western blotting. The therapeutic effect of FXa inhibitor was also examined in PVR mouse models.

Results

Vitreous FXa were higher in patients with traumatic PVR compared to patients with macular hole. Moreover, expressions of FXa and PAR1 were found in the epiretinal membranes from traumatic PVR patients. Vitreous FXa were markedly increased after mechanical ocular trauma in rabbits. In vitro, FXa stimulated RPE EMT characterized as ZO-1 disruption, compromised cell polarity, and increased fibronectin expressions. Co-injection of FXa and dispase in mice induced more severely damaged retinal structures, and increased α-SMA expressions than FXa or dispase treatment alone. Oral FXa or thrombin inhibitors significantly blocked intraocular fibrosis in PVR mouse models. FXa promoted phospho-activation of p38 in ARPE19 cells, which was dependent on PAR1. Moreover, TGF-βR inhibitor also significantly alleviated FXa-induced intraocular fibrosis in mice.

Conclusions

FXa promotes intraocular fibrosis in mice via mechanisms involving RPE activation.

Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban suppresses experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm progression via attenuating aortic inflammation

OBJECTIVE

Rivaroxaban is a specific factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor for venous thromboembolism treatment. Recently, increasing evidence have reported the beneficial effects of rivaroxaban on treating cardiovascular disorders such as coronary and peripheral artery disease. However, its potential influence on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate whether rivaroxaban treatment could attenuate experimental AAA progression and its related mechanisms.

APPROACHES AND RESULTS

In human aneurysmal aorta, FXa protein expression was significantly upregulated. Further investigations identified a positive correlation among plasma FXa level, AAA severity (the maximal aortic diameter), and intra-aneurysmal thrombus percentage. In Ang II (angiotensin II)-infused ApoE-/- mice, the administration of high dose rivaroxaban (15 mg/kg/d) for 14 days significantly reduced the maximal aortic diameter, while low dose rivaroxaban (5 mg/kg/d) did not display such a protective role. Although rivaroxaban treatments reduced the incidence of AAA and thrombus formation, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Immunohistochemistry revealed a pronounced aortic remodeling including increased collagen content and enhanced elastin degradation in Ang II-induced AAAs, which was inhibited by high dose rivaroxaban treatment. Further analysis demonstrated that rivaroxaban exerted its protective effects by decreasing leukocyte infiltration, inflammatory cytokines expression, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression in the aortic wall. The inhibitory effect of rivaroxaban on aneurysm development was also observed in calcium chloride-induced AAA model. Mechanistically, in human aortic endothelial cells, FXa stimulation increased the expression of inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and adhesive molecules, which were all reversed by the cotreatment of rivaroxaban. Subsequent monocyte-endothelial cell interaction was enhanced after FXa stimulation and was alleviated by rivaroxaban cotreatment. In addition, FXa induced a significantly heightened expression of MMP2 in human aortic endothelial cells, which was ameliorated by rivaroxaban coadministration.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban attenuated both angiotensin II- and calcium chloride-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progressions, through inhibiting aortic remodeling and inflammation. Rivaroxaban could be a promising therapeutic agent in attenuating AAA development by counteracting FXa-induced aortic wall inflammation.

Rivaroxaban improves vascular response in LPS-induced acute inflammation in experimental models

Rivaroxaban (RVX) was suggested to possess anti-inflammatory and vascular tone modulatory effects. The goal of this study was to investigate whether RVX impacts lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute vascular inflammatory response. Male rats were treated with 5 mg/kg RVX (oral gavage) followed by 10 mg/kg LPS i.p injection. Circulating levels of IL-6, MCP-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 were measured in plasma 6 and 24 hours after LPS injection, while isolated aorta was used for gene expression analysis, immunohistochemistry, and vascular tone evaluation. RVX pre-treatment significantly reduced LPS mediated increase after 6h and 24h for IL-6 (4.4±2.2 and 2.8±1.7 fold), MCP-1 (1.4±1.5 and 1.3±1.4 fold) VCAM-1 (1.8±2.0 and 1.7±2.1 fold). A similar trend was observed in the aorta for iNOS (5.5±3.3 and 3.3±1.9 folds reduction, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively), VCAM-1 (1.3±1.2 and 1.4±1.3 fold reduction, P<0.05), and MCP-1 (3.9±2.2 and 1.9±1.6 fold reduction, P<0.01). Moreover, RVX pre-treatment, improved LPS-induced PE contractile dysfunction in aortic rings (Control vs LPS, Emax reduction = 35.4 and 31.19%, P<0.001; Control vs LPS+RVX, Emax reduction = 10.83 and 11.48%, P>0.05, respectively), resulting in 24.5% and 19.7% change in maximal constriction in LPS and LPS+RVX respectively. These data indicate that RVX pre-treatment attenuates LPS-induced acute vascular inflammation and contractile dysfunction.

Potential Therapeutic Roles for Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors in Coronavirus Infections

Human factor Xa (FXa) is a serine protease of the common coagulation pathway. FXa is known to activate prothrombin to thrombin, which eventually leads to the formation of cross-linked blood clots. While this process is important in maintaining hemostasis, excessive thrombin generation results in a host of thrombotic conditions. FXa has also been linked to inflammation via protease-activated receptors. Together, coagulopathy and inflammation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of viral infections, including the current coronavirus pandemic. Direct FXa inhibitors have been shown to possess anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects, in addition to their established anticoagulant activity. This review summarizes the pharmacological activities of direct FXa inhibitors, their pharmacokinetics, potential drug–drug interactions and adverse effects, and the details of clinical trials involving direct FXa inhibitors in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Factor Xa and thrombin induce endothelial progenitor cell activation. The effect of direct oral anticoagulants

Factor Xa (FXa) and thrombin exert non-hemostatic cellular actions primarily mediated through protease-activated receptors (PARs). We investigated the effect of FXa and thrombin on human late-outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs), a type of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), and on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), rivaroxaban and dabigatran, was also studied. The membrane expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and the secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were used as cell activation markers. FXa and thrombin increase the ICAM-1 expression and the MCP-1 secretion on both cells, being higher on OECs. Vorapaxar, a specific PAR-1 antagonist, completely inhibits FXa-induced activation of both cells and thrombin-induced HUVEC activation, but only partially thrombin-induced OEC activation. Furthermore, thrombin-receptor activating peptide; TRAP-6, only partially activates OECs. OECs do not membrane-express PAR-4, therefore it may not be involved on thrombin-induced OEC activation. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran inhibit OEC and HUVEC activation by FXa and thrombin, respectively. Rivaroxaban enhances thrombin-induced OEC and HUVEC activation, which is completely inhibited by vorapaxar. The inhibition of OEC and HUVEC activation by vorapaxar and DOACs may represent a new pleiotropic effect of these drugs. The pathophysiological and clinical significance of our findings need to be established.

Utilizing Plasma Composition Data to Help Determine Procoagulant Dynamics in Patients with Thermal Injury: A Computational Assessment

INTRODUCTION

The development of methods that generate individualized assessments of the procoagulant potential of burn patients could improve their treatment. Beyond its role as an essential intermediate in the formation of thrombin, factor (F)Xa has systemic effects as an agonist to inflammatory processes. In this study, we use a computational model to study the FXa dynamics underlying tissue factor-initiated thrombin generation in a small cohort of burn patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma samples were collected upon admission (Hour 0) from nine subjects (five non-survivors) with major burn injuries and then at 48 hours. Coagulation factor concentrations (II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, TFPI, antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC)) were measured and used in a computational model to generate time course profiles for thrombin (IIa), FXa, extrinsic tenase, intrinsic tenase and prothrombinase complexes upon a 5 pM tissue factor stimulus in the presence of 1 nM thrombomodulin. Parameters were extracted from the thrombin and FXa profiles (including max rate (MaxRIIa and MaxRFXa) and peak level (MaxLIIa and MaxLFXa)). Procoagulant potential was also evaluated by determining the concentration of the complexes at select times. Parameter values were compared between survivors and non-survivors in the burn cohort and between the burn cohort and a simulation based on the mean physiological (100%) concentration for all factor levels.

RESULTS

Burn patients differed at Hour 0 (p < 0.05) from 100% mean physiological levels for all coagulation factor levels except FV and FVII. The concentration of FX, FII, TFPI, AT and PC was lower; FIX and FVIII were increased. The composition differences resulted in all nine burn patients at Hour 0 displaying a procoagulant phenotype relative to 100% mean physiological simulation (MaxLIIa (306 ± 90 nM vs. 52 nM), MaxRIIa (2.9 ± 1.1 nM/s vs. 0.3 nM/s), respectively p < 0.001); MaxRFXa and MaxLFXa were also an order of magnitude greater than 100% mean physiological simulation (p < 0.001). When grouped by survival status and compared at the time of admission, non-survivors had lower PC levels (56 ± 18% vs. 82 ± 9%, p < 0.05), and faster MaxRFXa (29 ± 6 pM/s vs. 18 ± 6 pM/s, p < 0.05) than those that survived; similar trends were observed for all other procoagulant parameters. At 48 hours when comparing non-survivors to survivors, TFPI levels were higher (108 ± 18% vs. 59 ± 18%, p < 0.05), and MaxRIIa (1.5 ± 1.4 nM/s vs. 3.6 ± 0.7 nM/s, p < 0.05) and MaxRFXa (13 ± 12 pM/s vs. 35 ± 4 pM/s, p < 0.05) were lower; similar trends were observed with all other procoagulant parameters. Overall, between admission and 48 hours, procoagulant potential, as represented by MaxR and MaxL parameters for thrombin and FXa, in non-survivors decreased while in survivors they increased (p < 0.05). In patients that survived, there was a positive correlation between FX levels and MaxLFXa (r = 0.96) and reversed in mortality (r= -0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombin and FXa generation are increased in burn patients at admission compared to mean physiological simulations. Over the first 48 hours, burn survivors became more procoagulant while non-survivors became less procoagulant. Differences between survivors and non-survivors appear to be present in the underlying dynamics that contribute to FXa dynamics. Understanding how the individual specific balance of procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins contributes to thrombin and FXa generation could ultimately guide therapy and potentially reduce burn injury-related morbidity and mortality.

Warfarin, but not rivaroxaban, promotes the calcification of the aortic valve in ApoE-/- mice

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are known to promote arterial calcification through blockade of gamma-carboxylation of Matrix-Gla-Protein. It is currently unknown whether other oral anticoagulants such as direct inhibitors of Factor Xa can have protective effects on the progression of aortic valve calcification.

AIMS

To compare the effect of warfarin and rivaroxaban on the progression of aortic valve calcification in atherosclerotic mice.

RESULTS

42 ApoE-/- mice fed with Western-type Diet (WTD) were randomized to treatment with warfarin (n = 14), rivaroxaban (n = 14) or control (n = 14) for 8 weeks. Histological analyses were performed to quantify the calcification of aortic valve leaflets and the development of atherosclerosis. The analyses showed a significant increase in valve calcification in mice treated with warfarin as compared to WTD alone (P = .025) or rivaroxaban (P = .005), whereas no significant differences were found between rivaroxaban and WTD (P = .35). Quantification of atherosclerosis and intimal calcification was performed on the innominate artery of the mice and no differences were found between the 3 treatments as far as atherogenesis and calcium deposition is concerned. In vitro experiments performed using bovine interstitial valve cells (VIC) showed that treatment with rivaroxaban did not prevent the osteogenic conversion of the cells but reduce the over-expression of COX-2 induced by inflammatory mediators.

CONCLUSION

We showed that warfarin, but not rivaroxaban, could induce calcific valve degeneration in a mouse model of atherosclerosis. Both the treatments did not significantly affect the progression of atherosclerosis. Overall, these data suggest a safer profile of rivaroxaban on the risk of cardiovascular disease progression.