Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of Apatinib With Rifampin and Itraconazole

Inhibitory effects of the main metabolites of Apatinib on CYP450 isozymes in human and rat liver microsomes

PURPOSE

The inhibitory effect of Apatinib on cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes has been studied. However, it is unknown whether the inhibition is related to the major metabolites, M1-1, M1-2 and M1-6.

METHODS

A 5-in-1 cocktail system composed of CYP2B6/Cyp2b1, CYP2C9/Cyp2c11, CYP2E1/Cyp2e1, CYP2D6/Cyp2d1 and CYP3A/Cyp3a2 was used in this study. Firstly, the effects of APA and its main metabolites on the activities of HLMs, RLMs and recombinant isoforms were examined. The reaction mixture included HLMs, RLMs or recombinant isoforms (CYP3A4.1, CYP2D6.1, CYP2D6.10 or CYP2C9.1), analyte (APA, M1-1, M1-2 or M1-6), probe substrates. The reactions were pre-incubated for 5 min at 37 °C, followed by the addition of NAPDH to initiate the reactions, which continued for 40 min. Secondly, IC50 experiments were conducted to determine if the inhibitions were reversible. The reaction mixture of the "+ NADPH Group" included HLMs or RLMs, 0 to 100 of μM M1-1 or M1-2, probe substrates. The reactions were pre-incubated for 5 min at 37 °C, and then NAPDH was added to initiate reactions, which proceeded for 40 min. The reaction mixture of the "- NADPH Group" included HLMs or RLMs, probe substrates, NAPDH. The reactions were pre-incubated for 30 min at 37 °C, and then 0 to 100 μM of M1-1 or M1-2 was added to initiate the reactions, which proceeded for 40 min. Finally, the reversible inhibition of M1-1 and M1-2 on isozymes was determined. The reaction mixture included HLMs or RLMs, 0 to 10 μM of M1-1 or M1-2, probe substrates with concentrations ranging from 0.25Km to 2Km.

RESULTS

Under the influence of M1-6, the activity of CYP2B6, 2C9, 2E1 and 3A4/5 was increased to 193.92%, 210.82%, 235.67% and 380.12% respectively; the activity of CYP2D6 was reduced to 92.61%. The inhibitory effects of M1-1 on CYP3A4/5 in HLMs and on Cyp2d1 in RLMs, as well as the effect of M1-2 on CYP3A in HLMs, were determined to be noncompetitive inhibition, with the Ki values equal to 1.340 μM, 1.151 μM and 1.829 μM, respectively. The inhibitory effect of M1-1 on CYP2B6 and CYP2D6 in HLMs, as well as the effect of M1-2 on CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 in HLMs, were determined to be competitive inhibition, with the Ki values equal to 12.280 μM, 2.046 μM, 0.560 μM and 4.377 μM, respectively. The inhibitory effects of M1-1 on CYP2C9 in HLMs and M1-2 on Cyp2d1 in RLMs were determined to be mixed-type, with the Ki values equal to 0.998 μM and 0.884 μM. The parameters could not be obtained due to the atypical kinetics of CYP2E1 in HLMs under the impact of M1-2.

CONCLUSIONS

M1-1 and M1-2 exhibited inhibition for several CYP450 isozymes, especially CYP2B6, 2C9, 2D6 and 3A4/5. This observation may uncover potential drug-drug interactions and provide valuable insights for the clinical application of APA.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and feasibility of apatinib in combination with gefitinib in stage IIIB-IV EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC: a drug-drug interaction study

PURPOSE

Apatinib combined with gefitinib was proven to benefit advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in first-line treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

In this phase 1b, multi-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study, the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib was evaluated when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Patients received single-agent apatinib 500 mg QD on days 1-4. Gefitinib 250 mg QD was given on days 5-15 and combined with apatinib 500 mg QD on days 12-15. Serial blood samples were drawn on days 4 and 15. The plasma concentrations and other pharmacokinetics parameters were measured for apatinib with and without gefitinib.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 22 patients and 20 were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. There were no distinct differences in apatinib Cmax and AUC0-τ with versus without gefitinib (geometric LSM ratio, 0.96 [90% CI 0.84-1.10] for Cmax and 1.12 [90% CI 0.96-1.30] for AUC0-τ). Similar PFS and grade of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were found between different Cmax and AUC0-τ of apatinib and gefitinib at 500 mg apatinib and 250 mg gefitinib dose levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatinib pharmacokinetics parameters were not significantly changed when coadministered with gefitinib. All TEAEs were manageable, and there was no need to change the dose level when combining apatinib and gefitinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04390984, May 18, 2020).

A Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Impact of Simvastatin and Itraconazole on Erlotinib Pharmacokinetics in Rats by UPLC-MS/MS

Aim

The goal of our study was to investigate the effects of single-dose simvastatin and itraconazole application on the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib in rats.

Methods

Twenty-one male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 3 groups, including erlotinib combined with simvastatin, erlotinib combined with itraconazole and erlotinib alone groups. The rats were given a single dose of 2 mg/kg simvastatin, 15 mg/kg itraconazole or 0.5% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose followed by 12 mg/kg erlotinib. The concentration of erlotinib in rat plasma was determined by UPLC-MS/MS. As internal standard, tinidazole was used for chromatographic analysis on the Kinetex C18 column (100×2.1 mm, 2.6 μm).

Results

Erlotinib was validated in the calibration range of 5-1000 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 5 ng/mL. The inter- and intra-day precisions for erlotinib were less than 10.56%, and the accuracies were in the range of 98.61-104.99%. The validated UPLC-MS/MS method was successfully applied to this study. Compared with the erlotinib alone group, the values of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, Vz/F and t1/2 in the simvastatin group showed no statistical differences among pharmacokinetic parameters (P>0.05). However, the values of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax, in the itraconazole group were approximately 1.32-fold, 1.32-fold and 1.34-fold higher, and the CL/F was lower than those in the erlotinib alone group; the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Simvastatin had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib, whereas co-administration of itraconazole considerably increased the exposure of erlotinib. Therefore, we should pay more attention to the potential drug-drug interaction to ensure safety in cancer patient treatment.

Effects of the CYP3A inhibitors, voriconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of osimertinib in rats

Background

Osimertinib, as third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is the first-line treatment approved to treat advanced T790M mutation-positive tumors. Triazole antifungals are therapeutic drugs for cancer patients to reduce the risk of opportunistic fungal infections. Our objective was to investigate whether three triazole antifungals (voriconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole) could change the pharmacokinetics of osimertinib in rats.

Methods

The adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 6): control (0.3% CMC-Na), and voriconazole (20 mg/kg), itraconazole (20 mg/kg), or fluconazole (20 mg/kg) combined with osimertinib (10 mg/kg) group. Tail vein blood samples were collected into heparin tubes at various time points within 0-48 h after osimertinib administration. Osimrtinib's plasma concentration was detected using HPLC-MS/MS system equipped with a Waters XBridge C18 column, with the mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and 0.2% formic acid water at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min.

Results

Co-administration with voriconazole or fluconazole increased the Cmax of osimertinib by 58.04% and 53.45%, respectively; the AUC0-t increased by 62.56% and 100.98%, respectively. However, when co-administered with itraconazole, the Cmax and AUC0-t of osimertinib only increased by 13.91% and 34.80%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results revealed that the pharmacokinetics of osimertinib were significantly changed by voriconazole and fluconazole in rats, whereas it was slightly affected by itraconazole. This work will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the pharmacokinetic properties of osimertinib when co-administered with triazole antifungals.

Itraconazole interferes in the pharmacokinetics of fuzuloparib in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

Fuzuloparib is an orally administered poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitor and has potential anti-tumor effect on ovarian cancer (such as fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer) in China. As fuzuloparib is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4, we explored the effect of itraconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on a single oral dose of fuzuloparib in healthy male subjects.

METHODS

An open-label, single-arm, fixed sequence study was conducted. Twenty healthy adult males received one single dose of fuzuloparib (20 mg) with one dose administered alone and the other dose coadministered with itraconazole. Subjects received 200 mg QD itraconazole for 6 days during the study. Serials of blood samples were collected pre-dose of each fuzuloparib capsule administration and 48 h post-dose, and were used to analyze the PK parameters of fuzuloparib.

RESULTS

Coadministration of repeated 200 mg QD oral doses of itraconazole for 6 days increased fuzuloparib exposure by 1.51-fold and 4.81-fold for peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), respectively. Oral administration of 20 mg fuzuloparib alone or together with itraconazole was safe and tolerable in healthy male subjects.

CONCLUSION

The CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole has a significant influence on the PK behavior of fuzuloparib, suggesting to avoid using strong CYP3A4 inhibitors simultaneously with fuzuloparib. If it is necessary to use a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, fuzuloparib would be discontinued and be restored to the original dose and frequency of administration after 5-7 half lives of CYP3A4 inhibitor stopped.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html , CTR20191271.

Application of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to evaluate the interaction between nifedipine and apatinib

Aim: It has been found that the co-administration of nifedipine with apatinib could cause exposure changes of nifedipine in vivo. But, whether this pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction (DDI) between nifedipine and apatinib could enhance the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine, causing sever changes of blood pressure was unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling to evaluate the effect of pharmacokinetic changes on the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine. Thus, the results could guide the co-administration of these two drugs in clinic.

Methods: A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was first developed for nifedipine. The pharmacokinetic DDI between nifedipine and apatinib was evaluated. Then the verified PBPK models were linked to a PD model for investigating whether the exposure changes of nifedipine could cause severe changes in blood pressure. Furthermore, the changes in blood pressure caused by combination with apatinib were also assessed in patients with hepatic impairment via the PBPK/PD models.

Results: The predicted area under plasma concentration-time profile (AUC), maximum concentration (C_max), area under effect-time profile (AUE), and maximum reduction in systolic blood pressure (R_max) are all within 0.5–2.0-fold of the observed data, indicating that the PBPK/PD models for nifedipine are successfully established. The increases of predicted AUC and C_max of nifedipine in the presence of apatinib are 1.73 and 1.41-fold, respectively. Co-administration of nifedipine with apatinib could cause exposure changes of nifedipine in vivo. However, the predicted AUE and R_max changes of nifedipine in the presence to the absence of apatinib in cancer patients as well as in patients with hepatic impairment are all within 1.25-fold. The results indicate that the exposure changes of nifedipine caused by combination of apatinib has little effect on the changes of systolic blood pressure both in cancer patients and patients with hepatic impairment.

Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic changes of nifedipine caused by co-administration with apatinib has little impact on the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine. Apatinib is unlikely to cause severe pharmacodynamic DDI via inhibition of CYP3A4. It is suggested that nifedipine could be used in combination with apatinib without dose adjustment in clinic.

Antifungal Drugs TDM: Trends and Update

PURPOSE

The increasing burden of invasive fungal infections results in growing challenges to antifungal (AF) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in AF TDM.

METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search for articles during 2016-2020 using "TDM" or "pharmacokinetics" or "drug-drug-interaction" with "antifungal," consolidated for each AF. Selection was limited to English language articles with human data on drug exposure.

RESULTS

More than 1000 articles matched the search terms. We selected 566 publications. The latest findings tend to confirm previous observations in real-life clinical settings. The pharmacokinetic variability related to special populations is not specific but must be considered. AF benefit-to-risk ratio, drug-drug interaction (DDI) profiles, and minimal inhibitory concentrations for pathogens must be known to manage at-risk situations and patients. Itraconazole has replaced ketoconazole in healthy volunteers DDI studies. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling is widely used to assess metabolic azole DDI. AF prophylactic use was studied more for Aspergillus spp. and Mucorales in oncohematology and solid organ transplantation than for Candida (already studied). Emergence of central nervous system infection and severe infections in immunocompetent individuals both merit special attention. TDM is more challenging for azoles than amphotericin B and echinocandins. Fewer TDM requirements exist for fluconazole and isavuconazole (ISZ); however, ISZ is frequently used in clinical situations in which TDM is recommended. Voriconazole remains the most challenging of the AF, with toxicity limiting high-dose treatments. Moreover, alternative treatments (posaconazole tablets, ISZ) are now available.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM seems to be crucial for curative and/or long-term maintenance treatment in highly variable patients. TDM poses fewer cost issues than the drugs themselves or subsequent treatment issues. The integration of clinical pharmacology into multidisciplinary management is now increasingly seen as a part of patient care.

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Evaluate the Drug-Drug and Drug-Disease Interactions of Apatinib

Aim: Apatinib is an orally administered vascular epidermal growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for the treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma or gastric esophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Apatinib is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4/5, followed by CYP2D6. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential drug–drug interaction (DDI) and drug–disease interaction (DDZI) risks of apatinib in Chinese volunteers.

Methods: Modeling and simulation were conducted using Simcyp Simulator. The input parameters required for modeling were obtained from literature research or experiments. Then, the developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were applied to evaluate single-dose DDI potential in Chinese healthy volunteers with weak and moderate CYP3A inhibitors, strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, as well as CYP3A4 inducers. The DDZI potential was also predicted in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Results: The developed PBPK models accurately assessed apatinib pharmacokinetics following single-dose administration in Chinese healthy volunteers and cancer patients. The DDI simulation showed 2–4-fold changes in apatinib exposures by moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and CYP3A4 inducers. A moderate increase of apatinib exposure (1.25–2-fold) was found with strong CYP2D6 inhibitor. In the DDZI simulation with hepatic impairment, the AUC of apatinib was significantly increased by 2.25-fold and 3.04-fold for Child–Pugh B and Child–Pugh C, respectively, with slightly decreased C_max by 1.54 and 1.67-fold, respectively.

Conclusion: The PBPK models developed in the present study would be highly beneficial to quantitatively predict the pharmacokinetic changes of apatinib under different circumstances, which might be difficult to evaluate clinically, so as to avoid some risks in advance.

Effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of rivoceranib in healthy subjects

Rivoceranib is a selective inhibitor of VEGFR-2 being developed for the treatment of solid tumor. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of food on bioavailability as well as single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PKs) of 81 and 201 mg doses of rivoceranib. The study was conducted as a two-part study. In Part 1 (single ascending dose (SAD), open-label, crossover study design), 2 oral doses of rivoceranib (81 mg or 201 mg) were given to all healthy subjects with a minimum 3-day washout period between dosing. Part 2 was a multiple ascending dose (MAD), open-label, crossover design where subjects were divided based on 81 and 201 mg doses. Both doses were administered with and without food in a crossover manner for the SAD and MAD parts. 24 healthy subjects completed Part 1 and 20 subjects completed Part 2. For the 81 mg dose in the SAD and MAD parts of the study, their food effect was not observed. For the 201 mg dose in both parts, food appeared to increase bioavailability by 20%-30% in Part 1, and 30%-40% in Part 2. Median t_max value was delayed when rivoceranib was administered with food at each dose level in both parts of the study. Dose proportionality was confirmed only for the AUC_0-∞  value from Part 1-fasted cohort but inconclusive for C_max  and AUC parameters under other dosing regimens. In conclusion, rivoceranib when taken with food delays t_max appears to increase bioavailability at 201 mg dose.

Effects of CYP3A inhibitors ketoconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its main metabolite in rats

Sunitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases such as platelet derived growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, kit receptor and other receptors. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved sunitinib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. It has been reported that sunitinib was mainly metabolized by CYP3A but its pharmacokinetic interactions have not been revealed. In this study, we investigated whether CYP3A inhibitors (ketoconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole) could influence the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its equipotent metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib in a drug-drug interaction study in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. The results showed that ketoconazole and voriconazole significantly increased the exposure of sunitinib, decreased the exposure of N-desethyl sunitinib, and inhibited the metabolism of sunitinib in rats. However, itraconazole showed only a weak effect on pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Coadministration of sunitinib with ketoconazole and voriconazole should be avoided if possible or if not, there should be therapeutic drug monitoring of the levels of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib. Therefore, drug-drug interaction should be considered when sunitinib is administered in conjunction with CYP3A inhibitors, which might lead to toxicity.

Dual blockade of EGFR and VEGFR pathways: Results from a pilot study evaluating apatinib plus gefitinib as a first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Dual blockade of both EGFR and VEGFR pathways in EGFR‐mutant NSCLC have shown enhanced antitumor efficacy versus EGFR‐TKIs alone. Apatinib is an orally effective VEGFR‐2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This pilot study aims to evaluate the tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of apatinib plus gefitinib as a therapy for EGFR‐mutant advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Advanced non‐squamous NSCLC participants harbored with the EGFR 19 deletion or the 21 L858R point mutation were included. There were two cohorts: Cohort A: apatinib 500 mg + gefitinib 250 mg. Cohort B: apatinib 250 mg + gefitinib 250 mg. The primary endpoint was safety profile. Other endpoints consisted of PK analysis, objective response rate (ORR), and progression‐free survival (PFS). Exploratory analysis was conducted using next‐generation sequencing of plasma circulating‐tumor DNA.

Results

Between July 2016 and April 2017, 13 of NSCLC patients were recruited. Six patients were pooled in Cohort A, while seven patients were in Cohort B. Adverse events (AEs) were tolerable (mostly grade 1–2) and the treatment‐related AEs were similar in both cohorts: rash (100% vs 71.4%), diarrhea (66.7% vs 71.4%), hypertension (66.7% vs 71.4%), proteinuria (66.7% vs 42.9%), and hand‐foot skin reaction (33.3% vs 28.6%). The area under plasma concentration‐time curve for the steady state of apatinib was 2864.73 ± 2605.54 ng mL^–1 h^–1 in Cohort A and 2445.09 ± 1550.89 ng mL^–1 h^–1 in Cohort B. Of the 11 patients evaluable for efficacy, Cohort A achieved an ORR of 80.0% and reached a median PFS of 19.2 months, while it was 83.3% and 13.4 months in Cohort B. Patients without a concomitant mutation at baseline had a prolonged PFS tendency (20.99 months v 13.21 months, P = .0624). The EGFR‐T790M mutation remained the dominant resistance mechanism.

Conclusion

Apatinib (500 mg) plus gefitinib (250 mg) showed a tolerable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity for advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC in the first‐line setting. Phase III trials of apatinib (500 mg) plus gefitinib (250 mg) are warranted.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02824458, date of registration June 23, 2016.

Effects of Apatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Nifedipine and Warfarin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Background and Purpose

Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of recurrent or progressive advanced-stage gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction cancer. The in vitro inhibition studies suggested that apatinib exerted potent inhibition on CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. To evaluate the potential of apatinib as a perpetrator in CYP450-based drug–drug interactions in vivo, nifedipine and warfarin were, respectively, selected in the present study as the probe substrates of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 for clinical drug–drug interaction studies. Since hypertension and thrombus are common adverse effects of vascular targeting anticancer agents, nifedipine and warfarin are usually coadministered with apatinib in clinical practice.

Methods

A single-center, open-label, single-arm, and self-controlled trial was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. The patients received a single dose of 30 mg nifedipine on Day 1/14 and a single dose of 3 mg warfarin on Day 3/16. On Day 9–21, the subjects received a daily dose of 750 mg apatinib, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of nifedipine and warfarin in the absence or presence of apatinib was, respectively, investigated.

Results

Compared with the single oral administration, coadministration with apatinib contributed to the significant increases of AUC_0–48h and C_max of nifedipine by 83% (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.46–2.31) and 64% (90% CI 1.34–2.01), respectively. Similarly, coadministration with apatinib contributed to the significant increases of AUC_0-t and C_max of S-warfarin by 92% (90% CI 1.68–2.18) and 24% (90% CI 1.10–1.39), respectively.

Conclusion

Concomitant apatinib administration resulted in significant increases in systemic exposure to nifedipine and S-warfarin. Owing to the risk of pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions based on CYP3A4/CYP2C9 inhibition by apatinib, caution is advised in the concurrent use of apatinib with either CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 substrates.

Apatinib as targeted therapy for advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance while suffering drug resistance itself

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors originated from mesenchymal tissues. They harbor more than 50 distinct subtypes and differ in pathological features and clinical courses. Despite the significant improvements in modern multi-modality treatment, the outcomes and overall survival rates remain poor for patients with advanced, refractory, metastatic, or relapsed diseases. The growth and metastasis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma largely depend on angiogenesis, and VEGF/VEGFR pathway is considered as the most prominent player in angiogenesis. Therefore, blockade of VEGF/VEGFR pathways is a promising therapeutic strategy to retard neovascularization. Several VEGFR inhibitors have been developed and revealed their favorable anti-neoplastic effects in various cancers, but such desirable anti-tumor effects are not obtained in advanced sarcomas because of multiple reasons, such as drug tolerance, short duration of response, and severe adverse effects. Fortunately, preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that apatinib is a novel promising VEGFR2 inhibitor showing potent anti-angiogenic and anti-neoplastic activities in advanced sarcomas. Especially, apatinib has showed notable characteristics in multidrug resistance reversal, tumor regression, vascular normalization, immunosuppression alleviation, and enhancement of chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic effects. However, apatinib also gets struck in dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents while suffering drug resistance itself, and several difficulties should be tackled before full use of apatinib. In this review, we discuss the outstanding characteristics and main predicaments of apatinib as targeted therapy in advanced sarcomas. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare but malignant tumors originated from mesenchymal tissues. They harbor more than 100 distinct subtypes and differ in features of pathologies and clinical courses. Despite the significant improvements in modern multi-modality treatment, the outcomes and overall survival rates remain poor for patients with advanced, refractory, metastatic, or relapsed lesions. The growth and metastasis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma largely depend on angiogenesis and VEGF/VEGFR pathways play a pivotal role in angiogenesis. Therefore, blockade of VEGF/VEGFR pathways is a promising therapeutic strategy. Several VEGFR inhibitors have been developed and verified in clinical trials but with unfavorable outcomes. Fortunately, preclinical studies and clinical trials have indicated that apatinib is a novel promising VEGFR2 inhibitor showing potent anti-angiogenic and anti-neoplastic activities in advanced sarcomas. Actually, apatinib has showed notable characteristics in multidrug resistance reversal, tumor regression, vascular normalization, immunosuppression alleviation, enhancement of chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic effects. However, apatinib also gets struck in dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents while suffering drug resistance itself, and several difficulties should be tackled before full use of apatinib. In this review, we discuss the outstanding characteristics and main predicaments of apatinib as targeted therapy in advanced sarcomas.

Effects of multidose simvastatin co-administration on pharmacokinetic profile of apatinib in rats by UPLC-MS/MS

Apatinib, a small molecule anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor is used extensively to treat advanced gastric cancer and simvastatin (SV) is often co-prescribed to treat cardiovascular disease in cancer patients. As both apatinib and SV are metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 variant CYP3A4, they are likely to interact. Therefore, the potential effect of SV co-administration on pharmacokinetics of apatinib in Sprague-Dawley male rats is demonstrated for the first time.Sixteen rats were randomly divided into two groups (n = 8), 2 mg/kg SV orally co-administrated for seven days (group B) and the corresponding control group (group A). Apatinib concentrations of rat plasma samples were detected by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non compartmental methods.Co-administration of SV for seven days significantly increased area under curve (AUC_(0-t)), AUC_(0-∞) and maximum plasma concentration of apatinib by 2.4-, 2.4-, and 2.7-fold, respectively while decreasing apparent volume of distribution and clearance by 81.7 and 73.9%, respectively.These findings suggest that concomitant administration of SV with 7 days may have inhibited the metabolism of apatinib in rats.

Apatinib: A Review in Advanced Gastric Cancer and Other Advanced Cancers

Apatinib [Aitan^® (brand name in China)], also known as rivoceranib, is a novel, small molecule, selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is the second anti-angiogenic drug to be approved in China for the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. This article summarizes the pharmacological properties of apatinib and reviews its clinical use in chemotherapy-experienced patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, including gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), or with other advanced cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, gynaecological cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), thyroid cancer and sarcomas. As third- or subsequent-line therapy, oral apatinib significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with placebo and had a manageable safety profile in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer or GEA participating in randomized, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2 and 3 trials. More limited evidence also supports it use as subsequent-line treatment in Chinese patients with other advanced or metastatic solid tumours, including NSCLC, breast cancer and HCC. Further clinical experience and long-term pharmacovigilance data are required to more definitively establish the efficacy and safety profile of apatinib, including its use in combination with other chemotherapy agents and its role in the management of other types of advanced or metastatic solid tumours. In the meantime, given its convenient administration regimen and the limited treatment options and poor prognosis for patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours, apatinib is an important, emerging treatment option for adult patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma or GEA who have progressed or relapsed after chemotherapy.

Progress in the treatment of solid tumors with apatinib: a systematic review

With the investigation of molecular targets, many agents, such as trastuzumab and ramucirumab, have attained a positive outcome in oncotherapy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is considered a potent factor in angiogenesis and plays an important role in the growth of tumors. Moreover, both VEGF and its receptor are usually excessively expressed in solid tumors and could be hopeful targets for the treatment of neoplasms. Apatinib (YN968D1) is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2. By inhibiting several signaling transduction pathways, it restrains angiogenesis and subsequently controls tumorigenesis. According to current studies, apatinib shows promising application in various solid tumors as a post-second- and post-third-line treatment. It could significantly improve the median overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with tolerated adverse reactions. This paper aims to summarize the recent research on apatinib including the mechanism, pharmacokinetics, trials, adverse reactions, and prospect as a treatment.