Temporal Trends in Grade 3/4 Adverse Events and Associated Costs of Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib for Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Novel immunotherapy-based combination treatments have drastically improved clinical outcomes for previously untreated patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). This study aimed to assess the temporal trends in grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) rates and associated costs of nivolumab plus cabozantinib combination therapy versus sunitinib monotherapy in previously untreated patients with aRCC.

METHODS

Individual patient data from the CheckMate 9ER trial (nivolumab plus cabozantinib: N = 320; sunitinib: N = 320) were used to calculate the proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs. AE unit costs were obtained from the United States (US) 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) and inflated to 2020 US dollars. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) all-cause and treatment-related grade 3/4 AE costs over 18-months, temporal trends, and top drivers of AE costs were evaluated in both treatment arms.

RESULTS

Overall, the proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs decreased over time, with the highest rates observed in the first 3 months for the nivolumab plus cabozantinib and sunitinib arms. Compared with sunitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with consistently lower average all-cause AE costs PPPM [month 3: $2021 vs. $3097 (p < 0.05); month 6: $1653 vs. $2418 (p < 0.05); month 12: $1450 vs. $1935 (p > 0.05); month 18: $1337 vs. $1755 (p > 0.05)]. Over 18 months, metabolism and nutrition disorders ($244), laboratory abnormalities ($182), and general disorders and administration site conditions ($122) were the costliest all-cause PPPM AE categories in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib arm, and laboratory abnormalities ($443), blood and lymphatic system disorders ($254), and metabolism and nutrition disorders ($177) were the costliest in the sunitinib arm. Trends of treatment-related AE costs were consistent with all-cause AE costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with lower costs of grade 3/4 AE management PPPM than sunitinib, which accumulated over the 18-month study period.

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Pembrolizumab-Axitinib, Nivolumab-Ipilimumab, and Sunitinib for Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved nivolumab-ipilimumab and pembrolizumab-axitinib as first-line treatments for metastatic, clear-cell, renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) based on results from CheckMate 214 and KEYNOTE-426. Our objective was to compare the adjusted, lifetime cost-effectiveness between nivolumab-ipilimumab, pembrolizumab-axitinib, and sunitinib for patients with mRCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3-state Markov model was developed comparing nivolumab-ipilimumab and pembrolizumab-axitinib to each other and sunitinib, over a 20-year lifetime horizon from a US medical center perspective. The clinical outcomes of nivolumab-ipilimumab and pembrolizumab-axitinib were compared using matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Costs of drug treatment, adverse events, and utilities associated with different health states and adverse events were determined using national sources and published literature. Our outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using quality-adjusted life years (QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Nivolumab-ipilimumab was the most cost-effective option in the base case analysis with an ICER of $34,190/QALY compared with sunitinib, while the pembrolizumab-axitinib ICER was dominated by nivolumab-ipilimumab and was not cost-effective (ICER=$12,630,828/QALY) compared with sunitinib. The mean total costs per patient for the nivolumab-ipilimumab and pembrolizumab-axitinib arms were $284,683 and $457,769, respectively, compared with sunitinib at $241,656. QALY was longer for nivolumab-ipilimumab (3.23 QALY) than for adjusted pembrolizumab-axitinib (1.99 QALY), which was longer than sunitinib's (1.98 QALY). These results were most sensitive to treatment cost in both groups, but plausible changes did not alter the conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The base case scenario indicated that nivolumab-ipilimumab was the most cost-effective treatment option for mRCC compared with pembrolizumab-axitinib and sunitinib.

Prognostic value of skeletal muscle mass during tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Low muscle mass has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in various cancers. This work investigated whether, during tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) therapy, low muscle mass was associated with treatment toxicity and survival outcomes. A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to June 2020, based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect sizes were estimated with hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity was assessed by measuring inconsistency (I²) based on the Chi squared test. A total of 24 retrospective studies were identified, enrolling patients treated with sorafenib (n = 12), sunitinib (n = 6), lenvatinib (n = 3), regorafenib (n = 2), gefitinib (n = 1), imatinib (n = 1), and pazopanib (n = 1). Thirteen studies were deemed eligible for pooled analyses. Meta-analyses found a significant effect of low muscle mass on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.26-4.58, p = 0.008, I² = 51%) in patients treated with TKI therapy. A subgroup analysis by treatment showed an association between DLT and low muscle during sorafenib or sunitinib, although not significant. A significant association between low skeletal muscle index and poorer overall survival was observed in HCC patients treated with sorafenib (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07-1.96, p = 0.02). For other TKIs, although some results showed an association between low muscle mass and worse outcomes, the number of studies for each TKI therapy was too small to reach conclusions. Skeletal muscle mass could influence the prognosis of some TKI-treated patients. This effect is demonstrated in sorafenib-treated HCC patients but remains almost unexplored in other cancer patients undergoing TKI therapy. Further prospective studies with large sample size and sufficient follow-up are needed to clarify the role of muscle mass in the metabolism of TKI-based cancer treatment, and its association with toxicity and survival.

Fish Oil, Se Yeast, and Micronutrient-Enriched Nutrition as Adjuvant Treatment during Target Therapy in a Murine Model of Lung Cancer

Despite the effectiveness of primary treatment modalities for cancer, the side effects of treatments, medication resistance, and the deterioration of cachexia after disease progression lead to poor prognosis. A supportive treatment modality to overcome these limitations would be considered a major breakthrough. Here, we used two different target drugs to demonstrate whether a nutraceutical formula (fish oil, Se yeast, and micronutrient-enriched nutrition; NuF) can interfere with cancer cachexia and improve drug efficacy. After Lewis lung cancer (LLC) tumor injection, the C57BL/6 mice were orally administered targeted therapy drugs Iressa and Sutent alone or combined with NuF for 27 days. Sutent administration effectively inhibited tumor size but increased the number of lung metastases in the long term. Sutent combined with NuF had no significant difference in tumor weight and metastasis compare with Sutent alone. However, NuF slightly attenuated metastases number in lung may via mesenchymal marker N-cadherin suppression. NuF otherwise increased epithelial-like marker E-cadherin expression and induce NO-mediated intrinsic apoptotic pathway in tumor cells, thereby strengthening the ability of the targeted therapy drug Iressa for inhibiting tumor progression. Our results demonstrate that NuF can promote the anticancer effect of lung cancer to targeted therapy, especially in Iressa, by inhibiting HIF-1α and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inducing the apoptosis of lung cancer cells. Furthermore, NuF attenuates cancer-related cachectic symptoms by inhibiting systemic oxidative stress.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Sunitinib and its Active Metabolite SU012662 in Pediatric Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors or Other Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Population pharmacokinetic analysis explored the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its primary active metabolite, SU012662, in children and evaluated the sunitinib dose(s) that produce comparable plasma exposures to adults receiving the approved daily dose.

METHODS

Data were from 65 children with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) or solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic models of sunitinib and SU012662 were developed using a systematic multi-step approach employing nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The effect of predefined covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters was assessed. Final models were validated using visual predictive check and statistical techniques.

RESULTS

The final dataset comprised 439 sunitinib and 417 SU012662 post-baseline plasma observations. Base models were characterized by two-compartment models with first-order absorption and lag time. Body surface area (BSA) was the only covariate that affected (P < 0.001) pharmacokinetic parameters for sunitinib and SU012662 and was incorporated into the final models. Bootstrap results indicated that the final models represented the final dataset adequately. Based on the final models, a sunitinib dose of ~ 20mg/m²/day in children with GIST aged 6-17 years would be expected to lead to similar total plasma exposures of sunitinib and SU012661 as a dose of 50 mg/day in an adult with GIST on schedule 4/2.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with GIST or solid tumors receiving sunitinib, population pharmacokinetic analysis identified BSA as the only covariate that affected pharmacokinetic parameters and predicted a dose of ~ 20 mg/m²/day as achieving equivalent exposure to 50 mg/day in adults with GIST on schedule 4/2.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers (date registered): NCT01396148 (July 2011); NCT01462695 (October 2011); NCT00387920 (October 2006).

Effects of CYP3A inhibitors ketoconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its main metabolite in rats

Sunitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases such as platelet derived growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, kit receptor and other receptors. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved sunitinib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. It has been reported that sunitinib was mainly metabolized by CYP3A but its pharmacokinetic interactions have not been revealed. In this study, we investigated whether CYP3A inhibitors (ketoconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole) could influence the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its equipotent metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib in a drug-drug interaction study in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. The results showed that ketoconazole and voriconazole significantly increased the exposure of sunitinib, decreased the exposure of N-desethyl sunitinib, and inhibited the metabolism of sunitinib in rats. However, itraconazole showed only a weak effect on pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Coadministration of sunitinib with ketoconazole and voriconazole should be avoided if possible or if not, there should be therapeutic drug monitoring of the levels of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib. Therefore, drug-drug interaction should be considered when sunitinib is administered in conjunction with CYP3A inhibitors, which might lead to toxicity.

A comparison of sunitinib with cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

MET (also known as hepatocyte growth factor receptor) signalling is a key driver of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Given that no optimal therapy for metastatic PRCC exists, we aimed to compare an existing standard of care, sunitinib, with the MET kinase inhibitors cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of patients with PRCC.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 65 centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with metastatic PRCC who had received up to one previous therapy (excluding vascular endothelial growth factor-directed and MET-directed agents). Patients were randomly assigned to receive sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib, or savolitinib, with stratification by receipt of previous therapy and PRCC subtype. All drug doses were administered orally: sunitinib 50 mg, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off (dose reductions to 37·5 mg and 25 mg allowed); cabozantinib 60 mg daily (reductions to 40 mg and 20 mg allowed); crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (reductions to 200 mg twice daily and 250 mg once daily allowed); and savolitinib 600 mg daily (reductions to 400 mg and 200 mg allowed). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Analyses were done in an intention-to-treat population, with patients who did not receive protocol therapy excluded from safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02761057.

FINDINGS

Between April 5, 2016, and Dec 15, 2019, 152 patients were randomly assigned to one of four study groups. Five patients were identified as ineligible post-randomisation and were excluded from these analyses, resulting in 147 eligible patients. Assignment to the savolitinib (29 patients) and crizotinib (28 patients) groups was halted after a prespecified futility analysis; planned accrual was completed for both sunitinib (46 patients) and cabozantinib (44 patients) groups. PFS was longer in patients in the cabozantinib group (median 9·0 months, 95% CI 6-12) than in the sunitinib group (5·6 months, 3-7; hazard ratio for progression or death 0·60, 0·37-0·97, one-sided p=0·019). Response rate for cabozantinib was 23% versus 4% for sunitinib (two-sided p=0·010). Savolitinib and crizotinib did not improve PFS compared with sunitinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 31 (69%) of 45 patients receiving sunitinib, 32 (74%) of 43 receiving cabozantinib, ten (37%) of 27 receiving crizotinib, and 11 (39%) of 28 receiving savolitinib; one grade 5 thromboembolic event was recorded in the cabozantinib group.

INTERPRETATION

Cabozantinib treatment resulted in significantly longer PFS compared with sunitinib in patients with metastatic PRCC.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute.

Quality-adjusted survival with first-line cabozantinib or sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma in the CABOSUN randomized clinical trial (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib as Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Poor or Intermediate Risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial (CABOSUN) was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial evaluating first-line cabozantinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). This post hoc analysis evaluated quality-adjusted survival using Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST).

METHODS

Survival plots for cabozantinib and sunitinib (650-day follow-up) were partitioned into 3 health states: time spent before disease progression without toxicity (TWiST; toxicity based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0] grade 3/4 adverse events), time spent before disease progression with toxicity (TOX; durations of adverse events based on published literature), and time after disease recurrence (relapse) or progression to death (REL). Q-TWiST was the sum of the mean time spent in each state, with each state weighted to reflect patient preferences (from 0 [worst] to 1 [best]) using utility scores. TWiST was always weighted as 1. Overall survival and time to disease progression were based on all randomized patients (157 patients); TOX was based on all randomized and treated patients (150 patients).

RESULTS

Across all utility combinations tested, Q-TWiST was found to be longer with cabozantinib versus sunitinib (range of differences, +24 days to +137 days). Q-TWiST differences that were found to be statistically significant (+92 days [95% confidence interval, 5-178 days] to +137 days [95% confidence interval, 60-214 days]) were of a clinically meaningful effect size (≥80 days), and were based on utility values that included those considered relevant for patients with aRCC (REL utility weight of 0.355, TOX utility weight of 0-1, and TWiST utility weight of 1).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with aRCC, first-line cabozantinib was found to provide longer quality-adjusted survival compared with sunitinib. These findings may help to inform clinical decision making.

LAY SUMMARY

Cabozantinib and sunitinib are drugs that are used to treat patients with advanced kidney cancer. Clinical trials have shown that cabozantinib offers benefits over sunitinib, giving patients more time before their cancer progresses. It is important that this additional time before disease progression does not come at the expense of patients' quality of life, which can be affected by treatment side effects and/or ongoing cancer symptoms. Both quantity and quality of life are central to optimal treatment. In the current analysis of patients with advanced kidney cancer who were initiating treatment for the first time, cabozantinib provided more quality time before cancer progression compared with sunitinib.

Paclitaxel/sunitinib-loaded micelles promote an antitumor response in vitro through synergistic immunogenic cell death for triple-negative breast cancer

Chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD) may offer a strategy to improve the effect of the therapeutic treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) by eliciting broad antitumor immunity. However, chemotherapy shows a limited therapeutic effect because of multi-drug resistance and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) of TNBC. The unique pharmacological actions of sunitinib (SUN) indicate its possible synergies with paclitaxel (PTX) to enhance chemo-immunotherapy for TNBC. Here, we prepared a co-delivery platform composed of poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA) via a self-assembly process for a combination of PTX and SUN, which was able to induce a higher synergistic ICD. The nanomicellar delivery of PTX and SUN loaded at an optimal ratio of 1:5 (PTX:SUN) presented the characteristics of an appropriate particle size, long-term stability, and time sequence release which synergistically promoted the apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 tumor cells. Moreover, we demonstrated that the combination of PTX and SUN could significantly induce a synergistic effect because it promoted an ICD response, improved tumor immunogenicity, and regulated immunosuppressive factors in the TME. Overall, PTX and SUN with synergistic effects entrapped in a self-assembly nano-delivery system could offer the potential for clinical applicationof a combination chemo-immunotherapy strategy to improve the effect of the therapeutic treatment of TNBC.

Cyclic pentapeptide cRGDfK enhances the inhibitory effect of sunitinib on TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human non-small cell lung cancer cells

In human lung cancer progression, the EMT process is characterized by the transformation of cancer cells into invasive forms that migrate to other organs. Targeting to EMT-related molecules is emerging as a novel therapeutic approach for the prevention of lung cancer cell migration and invasion. Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase (TNIK) has recently been considered as an anti-proliferative target molecule to regulate the Wnt signaling pathway in several types of cancer cells. In the present study, we evaluated the inhibitory effect of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and the integrin-α_Ⅴβ₃ targeted cyclic peptide (cRGDfK) on EMT in human lung cancer cells. Sunitinib strongly inhibited the TGF-β1-activated EMT through suppression of Wnt signaling, Smad and non-Smad signaling pathways. In addition, the cRGDfK also inhibited the expression of TGFβ1-induced mesenchymal marker genes and proteins. The anti-EMT effect of sunitinib was enhanced when cRGDfK was treated together. When sunitinib was treated with cRGDfK, the mRNA and protein expression levels of mesenchymal markers were decreased compared to the treatment with sunitinib alone. Co-treatment of cRGDfK has shown the potential to improve the efficacy of anticancer agents in combination with therapeutic agents that may be toxic at high concentrations. These results provide new and improved therapies for treating and preventing EMT-related disorders, such as lung fibrosis and cancer metastasis, and relapse.

Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Phase III Randomized IMmotion151 Trial: Atezolizumab Bevacizumab versus Sunitinib in Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were evaluated in the phase III IMmotion151 trial (NCT02420821) to inform overall treatment/disease burden of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab 1,200 mg intravenous (i.v.) infusions every 3 weeks (q3w) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg i.v. q3w or sunitinib 50 mg per day orally 4 weeks on/2 weeks off. Patients completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19), and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at baseline, q3w during treatment, at end of treatment, and during survival follow-up. Longitudinal and time to deterioration (TTD) analyses for core and RCC symptoms and their interference with daily life, treatment side-effect bother, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population included 454 and 461 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sunitinib arms, respectively. Completion rates for each instrument were 83% to 86% at baseline and ≥ 70% through week 54. Milder symptoms, less symptom interference and treatment side-effect bother, and better HRQOL at most visits were reported with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib. The TTD HR (95% CI) favored atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for core (HR, 0.50; 0.40-0.62) and RCC symptoms (HR, 0.45; 0.37-0.55), symptom interference (HR, 0.56; 0.46-0.68), and HRQOL (HR, 0.68; 0.58-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

PROs in IMmotion151 suggest lower overall treatment burden with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab compared with sunitinib in patients with treatment-naïve mRCC and provide further evidence for clinical benefit of this regimen.

Comparative efficacy and safety of sunitinib vs sorafenib in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the safety and efficiency of sunitinib and sorafenib in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Databases were searched up till February 28, 2018. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for eligibility, quality, and extracted relevant data. Results are expressed as risk ratio (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Six studies including 3112 patients were accessed. Sorafenib group exhibited higher median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared to sunitinib group (MD, -1.30; 95% CI, -2.56 to -0.03), especially in the first-line treatment (MD, -1.33; 95% CI, -2.61 to -0.04). However, sunitinib significantly reduced the risk of progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sorafenib (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.6-0.82). Sunitinib also significantly reduced risk of overall survival (OS) compared to sorafenib (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.92), while median OS was similar in both groups (MD, -0.48; 95% CI, -3.40-2.43). With regards to safety, the risk of rash (RR, 0.31, 95% CI, 0.12-0.79) was greater in sunitinib than sorafenib group, while the risk of decreased appetite (RR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.33-3.30) and dehydration (RR 2.73, 95% CI: 1.14-6.56) was smaller in contrast.Based on risk of PFS and OS, sunitinib was a better treatment option for RCC treatment while patients faced with severe skin reaction. And for those Asian patients classified under MSKCC moderate risk, whether in first or second-line treatment, had difficulty in feeding, sorafenib is a better choice for prolong mPFS.

Association between clinically relevant toxicities of pazopanib and sunitinib and the use of weak CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors

PURPOSE

Sunitinib and pazopanib, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), may be targets of potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (P-PK-DDIs). While strong cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A4) inhibitors or inducers should cause a clinically relevant modification in plasma TKI concentrations, the effect of weak inhibitors is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between weak P-PK-DDI and clinically relevant toxicity in real life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study including patients treated with sunitinib or pazopanib for any malignancies, for whom a PK-DDI analysis was performed before starting TKI. The primary endpoint was the correlation between P-PK-DDIs and a dose decrease after 1 month of treatment. The secondary endpoint was the correlation between PK-DDIs and drug withdrawal due to toxicity.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were assessed. A P-PK-DDI with weak CYP3A4 or P-gp inhibition was found in 14 patients. In patients with P-PK-DDI or without, the dose was reduced during the first month in 57.1% and 17.7% (p = 0.003) and the drug withdrawn in 42.8% and 11.3% (p = 0.011), respectively. In multivariate analysis, a significant correlation was found between P-PK-DDI (CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors) and dose reduction, and between drug withdrawal and PK-DDI (CYP3A4 inhibitors).

CONCLUSION

P-PK-DDI was correlated with dose reduction and drug withdrawal due to toxicity. The causality of this relationship warrants to be assessed; therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary in patients treated with TKI.

Intrigue: Phase III study of ripretinib versus sunitinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after imatinib

Ripretinib (DCC-2618) is a novel, type II tyrosine switch control inhibitor designed to broadly inhibit activating and drug-resistant mutations in KIT and PDGFRA. Ripretinib has emerged as a promising investigational agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor owing to targeted inhibition of secondary resistance mutations that may develop following treatment with prior line(s) of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here we describe the rationale and design of intrigue (NCT03673501), a global, randomized (1:1), open-label, Phase III study comparing the safety and efficacy of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor following imatinib. The primary end point is progression-free survival and key secondary objectives include objective response rate and overall survival. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03673501.

Poly(glycerol sebacate) nanoparticles for ocular delivery of sunitinib: physicochemical, cytotoxic and allergic studies

Poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS) is a new biodegradable polymer with good biocompatibility used in many fields of biomedicine and drug delivery. Sunitinib-loaded PGS/gelatine nanoparticles were prepared by the de-solvation method for retinal delivery and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. The nanoparticles were characterised by Fourier-transform infrared and differential scanning calorimetry. The effects of different formulation variables including drug-to-carrier ratio, gelatine-to-PGS ratio, and glycerine-to-sebacate ratio were assessed on the encapsulation efficiency (EE%), particle size, release efficiency (RE), and zeta potential of the nanoparticles. The in vitro cytotoxicity of PGS/gelatine nanoparticles was studied on L929 cells. Draize test on rabbit eyes was also done to investigate the possible allergic reactions caused by the polymer. Glycerine/sebacic acid was the most effective parameter on the EE and RE. Gelatine-to-PGS ratio had the most considerable effect on the particle size while the RE was more affected by the glycerine/sebacic acid ratio. The optimised formulation (S₁G_0.7D_21.2) exhibited a particle size of 282 nm, 34.6% EE, zeta potential of -8.9 mV, and RE% of about 27.3% for drug over 228 h. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthuazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay indicated PGS/gelatine nanoparticles were not cytotoxic and sunitinib-loaded nanoparticles were not toxic at concentrations <36 nM.

Reduction and Escalation in the Dose of Sunitinib Were Adequately Effective against Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Small Intestine

We herein report the first case in which an escalated dose of sunitinib was effective, even after dose reduction. A 64-year-old man with gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the small intestine discontinued adjuvant imatinib because of interstitial pneumonia. After two years, peritoneal recurrence was detected. Sunitinib was started at 50 mg/day for 4 weeks every 6 weeks, after which the dosage was reduced to 37.5 mg/day because of grade 1 gastritis, stomatitis, and a fever. Four months later, computed tomography showed progressive disease. As the adverse events were well-controlled by medication, we escalated the dose to 50 mg/day and achieved a partial response.

Association between the exposure to anti-angiogenic agents and tumour immune microenvironment in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) is largely unknown.

METHODS

A total of 81 surgical specimens from 67 patients with advanced GISTs were categorised into treatment groups: tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naive, n = 20; imatinib-progressed and no exposure to sunitinib or regorafenib (IM-PD), n = 30; and imatinib-progressed and sunitinib and/or regorafenib-treated (IM-PD/SU-treated), n = 31. Multiplexed immunofluorescence staining and RNA sequencing were performed to define TIME.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression rate (>1%) of DOG-1+ tumour cells was 5.0, 6.7, and 29.0% in TKI-naive, IM-PD, and IM-PD/SU-treated group, respectively (p = 0.02). FoxP3 expression of CD3+ T cells and CD204+ CD68+ monocytes per DOG-1+ cells was significantly higher in IM-PD/SU-treated group compared to TKI-naive and IM-PD groups (p < 0.05). IM-PD/SU-treated group showed increased expression of PD-1 on CD3+ T cells (p = 0.03 vs TKI-naive; p = 0.003 vs IM-PD) and DOG-1+ tumour cells (p = 0.02 vs TKI-naive; p = 0.006 vs IM-PD), TIM-3 expression on CD3+ T cells (p = 0.01 vs TKI-naive; p = 0.002 vs IM-PD), and LAG3 expression on CD3+ T cells (p = 0.001 vs TKI-naive; p = 0.004 vs IM-PD). In the RNAseq analysis, TIGIT expression was significantly increased in IM-PD/SU-treated GISTs compared to IM-PD (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressive phenotype was predominant in tumours treated with anti-angiogenic agents compared to TKI-naive and IM-treated tumours.

Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib for Untreated Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma of Intermediate or Poor Risk: Subgroup Analysis of the Alliance A031203 CABOSUN trial

Cabozantinib treatment prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of intermediate or poor risk by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria in the phase II CABOSUN trial (NCT01835158). In the trial, 157 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib or sunitinib, stratified by IMDC risk group and presence of bone metastases. Here, PFS and ORR, both determined by independent radiology committee (IRC), were analyzed by subgroups of baseline characteristics. Cabozantinib treatment was generally associated with improved PFS and ORR versus sunitinib across subgroups, including in groups defined by IMDC risk group, bone metastases, age, and tumor burden. Clinical trial identification number NCT01835158.

Denosumab and Sunitinib in the treatment of giant-cell tumor of bone with pulmonary and bone metastases in an adolescent: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell tumor of bone with pulmonary and bone metastases is exceedingly rare in adolescents. Furthermore, Denosumab and Sunitinib in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone has never been reported.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 16-year-old boy complained of fever, chest tightness, and shortness of breath and back pain for 5 days.

DIAGNOSIS

Giant cell tumor of bone with pulmonary and bone metastases.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent 2 surgeries for giant cell tumor of bone located in the spine and received Denosumab to reduce local recurrence and control the metastases. Then Sunitinib was added into treatment strategies after the progressing of metastases.

OUTCOMES

Within 5 months of Denosumab and Sunitinib, lung metastases were shrinking (stable disease, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1). Until now about 4 years into treatment the patient is still survival. Pulmonary and bone metastases are stable.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a case of multi-center giant cell tumor of bone, it does not only provide a reference to the treatment of similar cases of the clinic but also reflects the limitations of the application of Denosumab in the real world.

An in vitro Assessment of Thermo-Reversible Gel Formulation Containing Sunitinib Nanoparticles for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents have been widely used to treat several eye diseases including age-related macular degeneration (AMD). An approach to maximize the local concentration of drug at the target site and minimize systemic exposure is to be sought. Sunitinib malate, a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor was encapsulated in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles to impart sustained release. The residence time in vitreal fluid was further increased by incorporating nanoparticles in thermo-reversible gel. Nanoparticles were characterized using TEM, DSC, FTIR, and in vitro drug release profile. The cytotoxicity of the formulation was assessed on ARPE-19 cells using the MTT assay. The cellular uptake, wound scratch assay, and VEGF expression levels were determined in in vitro settings. The optimized formulation had a particle size of 164.5 nm and zeta potential of - 18.27 mV. The entrapment efficiency of 72.0% ± 3.5% and percent drug loading of 9.1 ± 0.7% were achieved. The viability of ARPE-19 cells was greater than 90% for gel loaded, as such and blank nanoparticles at 10 μM and 20 μM concentration tested, whereas for drug solution viability was found to be 83% and 71% respectively at above concentration. The cell viability results suggest the compatibility of the developed formulation. Evaluation of cellular uptake, wound scratch assay, and VEGF expression levels for the developed formulations indicated that the formulation had higher uptake, superior anti-angiogenic potential, and prolonged inhibition of VEGF activity compared with drug solution. The results showed successful development of sunitinib-loaded nanoparticle-based thermo-reversible gel which may be used for the treatment of neovascular AMD.

Carrier-Enhanced Anticancer Efficacy of Sunitinib-Loaded Green Tea-Based Micellar Nanocomplex beyond Tumor-Targeted Delivery

Although a few nanomedicines have been approved for clinical use in cancer treatment, that recognizes improved patient safety through targeted delivery, their improved efficacy over conventional drugs has remained marginal. One of the typical drawbacks of nanocarriers for cancer therapy is a low drug-loading capacity that leads to insufficient efficacy and requires an increase in dosage and/or frequency of administration, which in turn increases carrier toxicity. In contrast, elevating drug-loading would cause the risk of nanocarrier instability, resulting in low efficacy and off-target toxicity. This intractable drug-to-carrier ratio has imposed constraints on the design and development of nanocarriers. However, if the nanocarrier has intrinsic therapeutic effects, the efficacy would be synergistically augmented with less concern for the drug-to-carrier ratio. Sunitinib-loaded micellar nanocomplex (SU-MNC) was formed using poly(ethylene glycol)-conjugated epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (PEG-EGCG) as such a carrier. SU-MNC specifically inhibited the vascular endothelial growth factor-induced proliferation of endothelial cells, exhibiting minimal cytotoxicity to normal renal cells. SU-MNC showed enhanced anticancer effects and less toxicity than SU administered orally/intravenously on human renal cell carcinoma-xenografted mice, demonstrating more efficient effects on anti-angiogenesis, apoptosis induction, and proliferation inhibition against tumors. In comparison, a conventional nanocarrier, SU-loaded polymeric micelle (SU-PM) comprised of PEG-b-poly(lactic acid) (PEG-PLA) copolymer, only reduced toxicity with no elevated efficacy, despite comparable drug-loading and tumor-targeting efficiency to SU-MNC. Improved efficacy of SU-MNC was ascribed to the carrier-drug synergies with the high-performance carrier of PEG-EGCG besides tumor-targeted delivery.

Systemic management of malignant meningiomas: A comparative survival and molecular marker analysis between Octreotide in combination with Everolimus and Sunitinib

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness of octreotide/everolimus vs. sunitinib for the systemic treatment of recurrent aggressive meningiomas.

Methods

31 patients with recurrent or refractory WHO II or WHO III meningiomas were examined in two reference centers in Colombia. Patients who had systemic treatment (sunitinib, everolimus/octreotide) and a complete follow-up were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities were evaluated. Additionally, tissue samples were examined for PDGFRβ and VEGFR2, their expression was correlated with outcomes.

Results

Twenty-two patients (72%) were female with a median age of 55 years (SD±15.3). The most prevalent histology was anaplastic meningioma in 20 patients (65%) with 48% of patients suffering from three previous relapses before the start of systemic treatment. A total of 14 patients received combination therapy with octreotide/everolimus, 11 received sunitinib and the remaining 6 received other second-line agents. Median OS was 37.3 months (95%CI 28.5–42.1) and the PFS during the treatment with everolimus/octreotide (EO) and sunitinib (Su) was 12.1 months (95%CI 9.2–21.1) and 9.1 months (95%CI 6.8–16.8); p = 0.43), respectively. The OS of the group treated with the EO→Su→Bev sequence (1^st/2^nd/3^rd line) was 6.5 months longer than the Su→EO→Bev sequence (36.0 vs. 29.5 months) (p = 0.0001). When analyzing molecular markers, the positive PDGFRβ and negative VEGFR2 expression were associated with longer survival both in OS and PFS.

Conclusion

Sunitinib and octreotide/everolimus have similar efficacy and safety in the systemic management of refractory meningioma. VEGFR2 and PDGFRβ expression are associated with better outcomes.

The Alternative 2/1 Schedule of Sunitinib is Superior to the Traditional 4/2 Schedule in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

Alternate sunitinib schedules attracted the interest of oncologists recently owing to their superior safety profile. This meta-analysis compared the tolerability and efficacy of a new alternative dosing schedule (2 weeks on/1 week off) of sunitinib with the traditional 4/2 schedule in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Studies were retrieved from Medline, Cochrane Central, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Data were extracted and pooled as hazard ratio (HR: survival data) or odds ratio (OR: dichotomous data) using Comprehensive Meta-analysis software. Based on data of 1173 patients, the progression-free survival (HR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.95; P < .0001), overall survival (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85; P < .0001), and stable disease rates (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76; P = .006) were significantly improved on the alternative 2/1 schedule, compared with the traditional 4/2 schedule. However, the complete response (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.34-5.22; P = .69) and partial response (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.44-4.14; P = .61) rates were comparable between the 2 regimens. The tolerability of the alternative 2/1 schedule was superior to the traditional one as investigated adverse events like fatigue (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.89-4.46; P < .0001), hypertension (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.56-2.75; P < .0001), and diarrhea (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.19-3.98; P = .012) were significantly less common. In conclusion, the alternative 2/1 sunitinib schedule provides improved tolerability and survival in patients with mRCC. Large randomized trials with long follow-up periods are required to validate and confirm these findings.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative appliance of sunitinib in patients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of sunitinib in patients with metastatic and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched authenticated databases for related clinical studies. The baseline characteristics, parameters concerning the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of sunitinib were extracted for subsequent comprehensive analysis. The parameters which reflected the efficacy and safety as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), occurrence rate of all-grade and grade ≥3 adverse effects (AEs) were carefully pooled using comprehensive meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We finally recruited 411 patients from 14 eligible studies. We found proteinuria (75.0%, 95% CI 62.1%-84.6%), anemia (71.6%, 95% CI 60.9%-80.3%), athesia (60.0%, 95% CI 40.3%-77.0%), pause symptoms (59.2%, 95% CI 49.2%-68.4%), arterial hypertension (53.1%, 95% CI 43.2%-62.7%), and thrombocytopenia (52.5%, 95% CI 44.8%-60.0%) to be the most common all-grade AEs. And arterial hypertension, athesia, cutaneous toxicity, hypophosphatemia, leukopenia, pain, pause syndrome, renal dysfunction, and thrombocytopenia were the most common types of grade ≥3 AEs. In addition, objective response rate (ORR) of sunitinib to both the original and metastatic tumor sites increased with the use of sunitinib, so did the OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION

Common all-grade and grade ≥3 AEs were carefully monitored. The perioperative use of sunitinib showed superior ORR, OS, and PFS rates. Nevertheless, more studies are required to further verify these findings.

Ιmpact of sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism on survival of patients with metastatic renal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib plays an important role in managing the metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism is a common side-effect of the drug. There have been attempts to link hypothyroidism with a better clinical outcome in sunitinib-treated (mRCC) patients. Our aim was to relate the impact of hypothyroidism to the survival of these patients.

METHODS

We have evaluated 70 patients with mRCC that received sunitinib as a first line treatment. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was measured at baseline, after 15 days of treatment (day-15) and at the end of the second cycle (day-75). Biomarker data and correlations with response were analysed with Microsoft Excel. Comparison results from Student's t-test with a p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meyer and log-rank tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 for Windows.

RESULTS

Regarding the response to treatment, a progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.47 months and an overall survival (OS) of 22.03 months were demonstrated. Our data are consistent with published data by other authors. On day-15 from the beginning of the treatment an important number of patients exhibited a TSH elevation. On day-15 42.86% had a TSH over the upper normal limit and 50.0% at the end of the second cycle (day-75). TSH increased earlier in patients that exhibited an objective response (× 3.33 times the baseline values on day-15) than patients that exhibited disease stabilisation (× 2.18) or disease progression (× 1.59). Early increases in TSH were associated with a longer PFS (11.92 vs. 8.82 months, p = 0.0476) and a longer OS (3.10 vs. 1.08 years, p = 0.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

Early TSH-increase is associated with a clinical benefit. The patients that showed at least a twofold increase of their baseline TSH, responded to therapy by stabilisation or by regression of disease. This is the only study to our knowledge which shows that early increases - 2 weeks from starting the treatment - in TSH levels have a prognostic value. Both PFS and OS of the patients who demonstrated a higher than a twofold rise were significantly longer than the PFS and the OS of the patients that presented a lower or no TSH-increase.

Phase II Trial of Continuous Regorafenib Dosing in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Failure of Imatinib and Sunitinib

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib at the standard intermittent dosing schedule proved effective in the GRID trial for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, this dosing schedule requires frequent dose reduction, and the progression of GISTs or tumor-related symptoms during the off-treatment period has also been noted in some patients. Therefore, we conducted this phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous dosing schedule.

METHODS

Patients with measurable, metastatic, or recurrent GISTs who failed to respond to both imatinib and sunitinib were eligible for this study. Regorafenib 100 mg p.o. daily was administered continuously. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR: complete response plus partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]) lasting for at least 12 weeks using RECIST version 1.1.

RESULTS

The best response was PR in 2 (8%), SD in 16 (64%), and progressive disease in 6 (24%) patients. DCR lasting for at least 12 weeks was 64% (16 of 25). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9-8.6), and the 1-year survival rate was 64.5%. Ten patients (40%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicities, including hand-foot skin reaction (n = 4, 16%) and elevation of alanine aminotransferase (n = 2, 8%). Only six patients (24%) needed dose modification with a relative dose intensity of 95.0% for eight cycles in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous schedule might be an alternative treatment in patients with GISTs after failure of imatinib and sunitinib. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02889328 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Regorafenib at the standard intermittent dosing schedule proved effective in the GRID trial for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, this dosing schedule requires frequent dose reduction, and the progression of GISTs or tumor-related symptoms during the off-treatment period has been noted in some patients. This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib at a lower dose on a continuous dosing schedule. With good efficacy and acceptable safety profiles, regorafenib at a lower, continuously administered dose might be an alternative treatment in patients with GISTs after imatinib and sunitinib. Rechallenge of regorafenib may slow the disease progression.

Anlotinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor inhibiting angiogenesis. This multicenter, randomized phase II trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in comparison with sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mRCC from 13 clinical centers were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive anlotinib (n = 90) or sunitinib (n = 43). Anlotinib was given orally at a dose of 12 mg once daily (2 weeks on/1 week off), and sunitinib was given orally at 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

The median PFS was similar with anlotinib and sunitinib (17.5 vs. 16.6 months, p > .05). The median OS (30.9 vs. 30.5 months, p > .05), ORR (30.3% vs. 27.9%), and 6-week DCR (97.8% vs. 93.0%) were similar in the two groups. Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or 4 were significantly less frequent with anlotinib than with sunitinib (28.9% vs. 55.8%, p < .01), especially in terms of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. AEs occurring at a lower frequency with anlotinib were hand-foot syndrome, eyelid edema, hair depigmentation, skin yellowing, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The incidence of serious AEs was lower with anlotinib than with sunitinib.

CONCLUSION

The clinical efficacy of anlotinib was similar to that of sunitinib as the first-line treatment for mRCC, but with a more favorable safety profile.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Anlotinib, which was developed independently in China, is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor inhibiting multiple kinases involved in angiogenesis and tumor proliferation. Results indicated that the efficacy of anlotinib is comparable to and the safety is better than that of sunitinib.

Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma With a Long-term Response to Sunitinib: A Distinct Phenotype Independently Associated With Low PD-L1 Expression

BACKGROUND

Long-term responders (LTRs) are defined by at least 18 months of response to sunitinib in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Well-described by clinical studies, the phenotype of these tumors has never been explored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective and multicenter study, 90 ccRCCs of patients with metastatic disease were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (carbonic anhydrase IX, vascular endothelial growth factor, c-MET, programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1], and PD-1) and VHL status were performed. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated from sunitinib introduction and from progression. LTRs and their corresponding tumors were compared with others using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were LTRs. They had a median progression-free survival of 28 months versus 4 months for other patients (P < .001). Similarly, LTRs had a median overall survival of 49 months versus 14 months (P < .001), even from progression (median, 21 vs. 7 months; P = .029). They were associated with a favorable or intermediate risk (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model) (P = .007) and less liver metastasis (P = .036). They experienced more frequent complete or partial responses at the first radiologic evaluation (P = .035). The corresponding ccRCCs were associated with less nucleolar International Society for Urological Pathology grade 4 (P = .037) and hilar fat infiltration (P = .006). They were also associated with low PD-L1 expression (P = .02). Only the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model and PD-L1 expression remained significant after multivariate analysis (P = .014 and P = .029, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Primary tumor characteristics of LTRs were studied for the first time and demonstrated a different phenotype. Interestingly, they were characterized by low expression of PD-L1, suggesting a potentially lower impact of targeted immunotherapy in these patients.

Changes in skeletal muscle area and lean body mass during pazopanib vs sunitinib therapy for metastatic renal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether sunitinib and pazopanib treatments are associated with change in skeletal muscle area (SMA) and total lean body mass (LBM) as well as to compare their efficacies and safety profiles in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC).

METHODS

Thirty-six patients treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor were included. Eighteen of them received sunitinib and the rest/remaining received pazopanib in the first line of mRCC treatment. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography studies of the patients were performed to measure cross-sectional areas (cm²) of muscle tissues.

RESULTS

About 69% of patients were male and median age was 60 (49-68) years. Median time interval between two CT imagings was 6.1 (3.1-7.7) months and it was similar between the two groups (for sunitinib, 4.9 (2.5-6.9) months vs for pazopanib, 7.3 (3.2-9.5) months, p = 0.16, respectively). Disease control rate was 77.7% in all patients. Of these, 66.6% in sunitinib group was consisted of four partial responses and eight stable diseases. In addition, 88.8% in pazopanib group was consisted of three partial responses and 13 stable diseases. A significant decrease in SMA and LBM was observed after sunitinib therapy, whereas SMA and LBM values of pazopanib group did not change significantly (p = 0.02 and p = 0.70, respectively). No significant differences were observed between patients with sunitinib, and pazopanib group median PFS [11.9 (95% CI 6.1-17.6) vs 8.1 months (95% CI 7.2-9.1), respectively; p = 0.28] and median OS [28.6 (95% CI 24.3-32.9) vs 25.5 months (95% CI 18.9-52.7), respectively; p = 0.42]. Dose-limiting toxicities were significantly more frequent in sunitinib group than in pazopanib group (66.7% vs 22.2%, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of SMA and LBM with sunitinib was more substantial than with pazopanib. Treatment efficacies of both drugs were similar, but dose-limiting toxicity was more frequent in sunitinib group. Loss of SMA had no significant association with prognosis. Further studies are needed to clarify the possible association between SMA and prognosis in mRCC patients who receive sunitinib or pazopanib.

Complete response to sunitinib for more than three years in a patient with a jejunum gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report

RATIONALE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract and is characterized by KIT mutations. Patientsresistant to 1st-line imatinib therapy are usually given sunitinib assecond-line treatment, which provides a median progression-free survival of 8 to 12 months. We report the 1st case of metastatic jejunum GIST with a KIT exon 11 deletion that showed complete response (CR) to sunitinib for more than 3 years.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 34-year-old man with advanced jejunum GIST was surgically treated upon initial diagnosis, and was histologically found to carry a high recurrence risk. Genetic testing revealed a KIT exon 11 deletion, and adjuvant therapy with imatinib was administered. The imatinib dose was escalated following recurrence in the abdomen, but the mass continued to grow.

DIAGNOSIS

He was diagnosed with abdominal recurrence of GIST based on his medical history and histopathological results.

INTERVENTION

Second-line sunitinib therapy was given.

OUTCOMES

The mass disappeared, and CR was seen following 7 months of sunitinib therapy; this CR was sustained for more than 45 months.

LESSONS

In cases of metastatic jejunum GIST with a KIT exon 11 deletion, sunitinib as second-line therapy can be used to achieve CR for more than 3 years.

Results of weekday-on and weekend-off administration schedule of sunitinib therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib is widely prescribed as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To reduce the ratio of severe adverse events and improve the relative dose intensity, we prospectively tried our own alternative medication schedule, which we called the "weekday-on and weekend-off regimen". Here we report the results of this regimen compared to the conventional medication schedule.

METHODS

In total, 58 patients were enrolled in this study. Twenty patients were treated under the alternative schedule (group I: weekday-on and weekend-off regimen) and 38 patients were treated using the conventional schedule (group II: 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off regimen). The relative dose intensity (6W-RDI) and prognoses were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Median 6W-RDI of all the patients was 75.0%. Group I patients demonstrated significantly higher 6W-RDI compared to group II (77.2 vs. 70.4%) (p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis showed that the alternative sunitinib administration schedule was significantly associated with maintaining 6W-RDI above 75% for RCC patients treated with sunitinib (OR 3.592, 95% CI 1.042-12.383, p = 0.043). On the other hand, there were no significant differences between 2 groups regarding occurrence rate of severe adverse events and prognosis by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the results of an alternative medication schedule, the "weekday-on and weekend-off regimen", as a means of increasing 6W-RDI for metastatic RCC patients.

The combination of bevacizumab/temsirolimus after first-line anti-VEGF therapy in advanced renal-cell carcinoma: a clinical and biomarker study

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeting represents the standard first-line therapy for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC), while blocking the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is effective in relapsed disease. Since continuing blockade of VEGF may be of value, we studied the combination of bevacizumab with temsirolimus in mRCC patients relapsing after first-line treatment.

METHODS

A prospective, phase II study of the combination of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) with temsirolimus (25 mg weekly) in patients with mRCC who failed first-line anti-VEGF treatment. 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was the primary end point. The association of VEGFa, VEGFR2, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) b, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) a and PDGFRb with prognostic factors and outcomes were also studied.

RESULTS

39 patients were enrolled. First-line therapy included: sunitinib (n = 16), bevacizumab/interferon (n = 12), pazopanib (n = 10), sorafenib (n = 1). After a median follow-up of 37 months, 6-month PFS rate was 50.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 33.8-65.7], median time to progression 6.8 months (95% CI 5.5-9.2) and median overall survival (OS) 18.2 months (95% CI 12.9-27.2). Objective response rate was 27%. The most common AEs were metabolic (33%), renal (8%) and gastrointestinal (GI) (7%). The most common grade 3-5 AEs were GI (18%), infections (14%) and metabolic (25%). Toxicity was the most frequent cause of treatment discontinuation (40%). FGFb levels were associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In concert with recent data, our study confirms the efficacy of anti-VEGF/anti-mTOR combination in mRCC relapsing after anti-VEGF therapy. Toxicity was considerable leading to high rate of treatment discontinuations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01264341.

A five-gene signature may predict sunitinib sensitivity and serve as prognostic biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma

Sunitinib resistance is, nowadays, the major challenge for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients. Illuminating the potential mechanisms and exploring effective strategies to overcome sunitinib resistance are highly desired. We constructed a reliable gene signature which may function as biomarkers for prediction of sunitinib sensitivity and clinical prognosis. The gene expression profiles were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. By performing GEO2R analysis, numerous differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found to be associated with sunitinib resistance. To acquire more precise DEGs, we integrated three different microarray datasets. Functional analysis revealed that these DEGs were mainly involved in Rap1 signaling pathway, p53 signaling pathway and Ras signaling pathway. Then, top five hub genes, BIRC5, CD44, MUC1, TF, CCL5, were identified from protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Sub-network analysis carried out by MCODE plugin revealed that key DEGs were related with PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, Rap1 signaling pathway and VEGF signaling pathway. Next, we established sunitinib-resistant OS-RC-2 and 786-O cell lines and validated the expression of five hub genes in cell lines. To further evaluate the potentials of five-gene signature for predicting clinical prognosis, we analyzed RCC patients with gene expressions and overall survival information from two independent patient datasets. The Kaplan-Meier estimated the OS of RCC patients in the low- and high-risk groups according to gene expression signature. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the prognostic power of five-gene signature was independent of clinical features. In conclusion, we developed a five-gene signature which can predict sunitinib sensitivity and OS for advanced RCC patients, providing novel insights into understanding of sunitinib-resistant mechanisms and identification of RCC patients with poor prognosis.

Sunitinib versus sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma patients

PURPOSE

To compare sunitinib vs sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2016, 104 patients with inoperable stage III HCC were included and randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the sunitinib+TACE (SU+TACE) group received sunitinib orally 37.5 mg daily, while patients in the sorafenib+TACE (SO+TACE) group received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The two groups were given sunitinib or sorafenib on an interrupted schedule, with a 4-7 days interval before or after TACE sessions. TACE treatment was repeated every 6-8 weeks. Patients were treated for about 4-6 cycles until the occurrence of toxicity or patient refusal, or progressive disease.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) in the SO+TACE group were significantly higher than that in the SU+TACE (OS: p=0.017; PFS: p=0.036, respectively). The rates of response and disease control were higher in the SO+TACE group (58%, 79%, respectively) compared to the SU+TACE group (37%, 66%, respectively), although without statistical significance. Regarding the toxicities, we found higher rates of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) in the SO+TACE group, while frequent occurrence of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in the SU+TACE group.

CONCLUSIONS

The SO+TACE regimen was more effective and well tolerated in patients with unresectable stage III HCC compared to the SU+TACE regimen. The SO+TACE regimen may be a better alternative to the current standard regimens.