Characterization of the Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Upadacitinib Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses to Support Dose Selection of Upadacitinib in Crohn's Disease

Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase inhibitor, is the first orally administered therapy approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). This work characterized the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in CD patients and evaluated the relationships between upadacitinib steady-state plasma exposures and efficacy as well as safety parameters during the 12-week induction and the 52-week maintenance periods, to provide dosing recommendations for the treatment of CD. Upadacitinib pharmacokinetics in CD patients administered the extended-release formulation were consistent with patient populations in other approved indications. None of the evaluated CD-specific patient characteristics (e.g., disease location and prior gastrointestinal surgeries) had a meaningful impact on upadacitinib pharmacokinetics. Exposure-response analyses during 12-week induction treatment showed that response across all evaluated efficacy end points were approaching a plateau at median plasma exposures associated with 45 mg QD. Analyses for the maintenance period demonstrated that 30 mg QD is predicted to provide an additional 8% to 10% benefit for endoscopic response and endoscopic remission compared with 15 mg QD in patients who failed biologics. The analyses for safety showed a statistically significant relationship between increasing upadacitinib plasma exposures and the percentage of patients experiencing >2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin from Baseline during induction and showed shallow relationships for serious infections and herpes zoster during the maintenance period. These results demonstrated adequate absorption of the extended-release formulation of upadacitinib in CD patients. The exposure-response analyses confirmed that 45 mg QD dose maximized efficacy as induction treatment and supported the selection of 15 mg QD or 30 mg QD as the maintenance doses.

Upadacitinib as salvage therapy in adolescents with acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional treatments

Objectives

Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults. Current standard management for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) involves intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) followed by infliximab (IFX) salvage therapy. Limited data exist on the utility of UPA in ASUC, particularly in adolescents. This case series reports the use of UPA as salvage therapy in hospitalized adolescents experiencing ASUC refractory to IFX.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients with ASUC who received UPA as salvage therapy after initiation of IVCS and failure of IFX.

Results

Three adolescents were hospitalized with ASUC for which IFX infusion treatments were unsuccessful. Initiation of UPA enabled patients to improve their Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index scores to ≤35 and be discharged home. Hospitalization course, complications, and follow-up information are provided.

Conclusion

UPA is a promising short-term salvage therapy in adolescent ASUC cases resistant to conventional treatments. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate its long-term efficacy and safety in this specific population. These findings provide a novel therapeutic avenue for managing ASUC in adolescents, offering hope for those encountering treatment challenges.

Pharmacological considerations in pharmacotherapy of rheumatology patients with liver disease: a brief narrative review

The presence of chronic liver diseases such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis liver disease, viral hepatitis, and cirrhosis may affect the treatment plan in patients with rheumatologic disorders, with concern about the adverse effects of the rheumatic medications on the course of liver disease. Advanced liver disease can change the elimination and activation of many drugs. In addition, there are concerns about the risk of viral reactivation after using biologics and immunosuppressants in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. This narrative review will assess the considerations that should be made before starting the most frequently used drugs in all common rheumatic diseases and patients with chronic liver diseases including chronic viral hepatitis.

Safety and Effectiveness of Thiopurines and Small Molecules in Elderly Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) requires weighing an individual patient's therapeutic benefits and therapy-related complication risks. The immunomodulators that have been commonly used so far in IBD therapy are thiopurines, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine. As our understanding of the IBD pathomechanisms is widening, new therapeutic approaches are being introduced, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators' development. Non-selective JAK inhibitors are represented by tofacitinib, while selective JAK inhibitors comprise filgotinib and upadacitinib. As for the S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for UC therapy. The number of elderly patients with IBD is growing; therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the oral immunomodulators among the subjects aged ≥60. Possible complications limit the use of thiopurines in senior patients. Likewise, the promising effectiveness of new drugs in IBD therapy in those with additional risk factors might be confined by the risk of serious adverse events. However, the data regarding this issue are limited.

A Gastroenterologist's guide to drug interactions of small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease

Small molecule drugs are becoming increasingly used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, unlike monoclonal antibody drugs, which have few interactions with other medications, the pharmacokinetics of small molecule drugs are complex and may be influenced by a myriad of drug-drug interactions (DDI) as well as by patient characteristics and food intake. This review aims to provide a concise practical guide to small molecule drug interactions for the use of IBD physicians. It starts with a brief overview of the main metabolizing enzymes and transporters involved in drug interactions and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approach to determining drug-interaction hazard thresholds. It is then followed by a more detailed review of the pharmacokinetics of five novel small molecules approved in IBD: Tofacitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib, Ozanimod, and Etrasimod, including their known interactions and specific warnings. This review will also inform readers on challenges in determining the actual magnitude of interactions and their clinical relevance, including the arbitrary nature of some hazard thresholds, the inference of the impact on metabolizing enzymes and transporters from single-drug assays which may not reflect poly-pharmaceutical regimens, and other challenges in this field which the IBD physician needs to be cognizant of. In practice, before administering a small molecule drug, it is advisable to evaluate any potential interactions with other medications the patient is receiving. An increased awareness by health care professionals and patients, may reduce the possible risks associated with DDI of small molecule IBD drugs.

Evaluating the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Janus kinases (JAK) are enzymes involved in signaling pathways that activate the immune system. Upadacitinib, an oral small molecule, is the first JAK inhibitor approved by FDA and EMA for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD), following successful phase II and III trials. Compared to other JAK inhibitors, upadacitinib has a high selectivity toward JAK1. This characteristic could improve its efficacy and safety.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the available knowledge on the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for CD.

EXPERT OPINION

The approval of newer targeted small molecules drug, including JAK inhibitors, marked a significant advancement in terms of effectiveness. In fact, the oral administration, the rapid absorption, the excellent bioavailability and the short serum time of maximum concentration are some of the advantages compared to biologics. The selective inhibition of JAK1 by upadacitinib allows for high efficacy while maintaining a reliable safety profile.

Upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

Despite an increasing number of therapies for Crohn's disease (CD), half of patients do not respond to initial treatment or lose response over time, highlighting the need for novel therapies. Inhibition of Janus kinases (JAKs) has emerged as an important therapeutic target for CD. Upadacitinib is an orally administered selective JAK1 inhibitor, which is effective for the induction and maintenance of remission in moderately-to-severely active CD, including in patients with prior failure of biological therapy. Nonselective JAK inhibition has been associated with thromboembolic disease, cardiovascular events and malignancy in patients older than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis and pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors, which should be considered upon prescription. Upadacitinib is the first and currently only oral advanced therapy for CD.

Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors

Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents-biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.

Navigating the atopic dermatitis toolbox: Challenging scenarios and shared decision-making

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a complex pathogenesis and heterogeneous clinical presentation. Recently, multiple advanced therapies were approved for the treatment of moderate-severe AD, including the biologics dupilumab, tralokinumab, and lebrikizumab and oral Janus kinase inhibitors abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib. These treatments have different efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles and monitoring requirements. The availability of multiple recently approved therapies poses a clinical challenge for health care providers and patients on how to select the best treatment for patients. This article aims to highlight clinical considerations and patient perspectives to guide shared decision-making for biologic and oral systemic therapy, particularly Janus kinase inhibitors, in AD. Important aspects to consider include treatment goals, medical history, symptom severity, physician assessments, safety profile of drugs, and the risk predispositions in patients.

Upadacitinib: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor which is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, as well as other agencies around the world for the treatment of several chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatic, dermatologic, and gastrointestinal diseases. Through inhibition of JAK, upadacitinib inhibits phosphorylation of downstream effector proteins, which consequently inhibits cytokine signaling for key pathways involved in inflammatory diseases. Upadacitinib more potently inhibits JAK1 than other JAK isoforms. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of upadacitinib were characterized in many clinical trials, which demonstrated the superiority of upadacitinib treatment over placebo or an active comparator in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, atopic dermatitis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. The safety profile of upadacitinib supported a favorable benefit-risk profile across all the approved indications. In this article, we review the mechanism of action of upadacitinib and describe how the JAK-STAT (Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription) pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of several chronic and progressive immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. In addition, this review also provides an overview of key clinical trials that were conducted as well as relevant data which supported the clinical development of upadacitinib and informed the recommended dose(s) in each of the approved indications.

Impact of upadacitinib on the risk of digestive events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is an effective treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its use has been associated with an increased risk of digestive events. This systematic review aimed to investigate the risk of digestive events in RA patients treated with UPA.

Methods

Systematic searches of electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) from inception to September 2022 were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared UPA with control treatment and reported digestive events in RA patients. We pooled data using the random-effects model and meta-analysis was conducted by Stata software.

Results

Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed, with a total of 6103 patients. Compared with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), pooled analysis of 8 trials revealed no statistical difference in hepatic disorder (HD) risk and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation (GIP) risk ((OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.56, I² = 0.00%); OR = 4.49, 95% CI 0.56 to 35.93, I² = 0.00%)). When we considered the influence of UPA on the grade of liver enzymes, the data indicated that grade 3 and 4 elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were infrequent. Additionally, a dose-dependent impact of UPA on the risks of HD was not observed. The results suggested no interaction by dose of drug, or indication for treatment of GIP risk.

Conclusion

Our results showed that RA patients receiving UPA compared with csDMARDs had no significant increased risk associated with digestive events. Further long-term research of emerging data is urgently needed to gain a better understanding of the association between UPA and digestive events in the RA population.

The role of upadacitinib in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

The JAK signaling pathway plays a major role in the immunopathology of autoimmune diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. JAK enzymes provide novel targets for rapidly effective inflammatory bowel disease therapy, particularly in ulcerative colitis. Upadacitinib is a targeted JAK1 inhibitor. In multiple phase III clinical trials, upadacitinib has demonstrated significant improvement in clinical and endoscopic outcomes and quality of life for patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. In this drug evaluation we describe the role of the JAK signaling pathway in ulcerative colitis, the mechanism of action of upadacitinib and the current clinical evidence for its use in ulcerative colitis; we also review its safety and tolerability, including for special populations.

Update on the role of upadacitinib in the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

With further knowledge of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, small oral molecules have become available, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor and has become the newest drug in this class, with recent approval for the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. The large phase III program (including the U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH parallel induction trials and the U-ACHIEVE Maintenance trial) demonstrated superiority over placebo, for all primary and secondary endpoints including key clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes utilizing 45 mg orally (po) once daily (OD) during induction and either 30 mg or 15 mg po OD in maintenance. From a safety perspective, UPA has proven to be a safe and well-tolerated medication across immune-mediated diseases with manageable adverse risks such as an increase in herpes zoster. Proper discussion and patient profiling are essential when positioning UPA, considering efficacy and potential risks associated with this highly effective medication.

Research on Liver Damage Caused by the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Novel Biological Agents or Targeted Agents

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by polyarticular, symmetric, and aggressive inflammation of the small joints in the hands and feet, resulting in dysfunction. With progress and development in medicine, treatment of RA is constantly evolving, making several drugs available for the treatment of RA. From the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the start of illness to glucocorticoids and then to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), therapeutic-use drugs for RA have been keeping pace with scientific research. However, various types of drugs have additional side effects when used over the long-term. New and emerging biological and targeted agents have been widely applied in recent years; however, the side effects have not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we review the research progress on liver damage caused by novel biological and targeted agents available for RA treatment. The aim is to provide a reference for rational clinical administration of such drugs.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with conventional, targeted and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the setting of liver injury and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Increased incidence of liver diseases emphasizes greater caution in prescribing antirheumatic drugs due to their hepatotoxicity. A transient elevation of transaminases to autoimmune hepatitis and acute liver failure has been described. For every 10 cases of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation in a clinical trial, it is estimated that one case of more severe liver injury will develop once the investigated drug is widely available. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs) are less likely to cause liver damage. However, various manifestations, from a transient elevation of transaminases to autoimmune hepatitis and acute liver failure, have been described. Research on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has provided insight into a pre-existing liver disease that may be worsen by medication. Diabetes and obesity could be an additional burden in drug-induced liver injury (DILI). In the intertwining of the inflammatory and metabolic pathways, the most important cytokines are IL-6 and TNF alpha, which are also the cornerstone of biological treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. This narrative review evaluates the complexity and prevention of DILI in RA and treatment options involving biological therapy and tsDMARDs.

Upadacitinib pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of efficacy and safety in psoriatic arthritis patients - Analyses of phase III clinical trials

Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and recently approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The efficacy and safety profile of upadacitinib in PsA have been established in the SELECT‐PsA program in two global phase III studies, which evaluated upadacitinib 15 and 30 mg q.d. The analyses described here characterized upadacitinib pharmacokinetics and exposure‐response relationships for efficacy and safety endpoints using data from the SELECT‐PsA studies. Upadacitinib pharmacokinetics in patients with PsA were characterized through a Bayesian population analysis approach and were comparable to pharmacokinetics in patients with RA. Exposure‐response relationships for key efficacy and safety endpoints were characterized using data from 1916 patients with PsA. The percentage of patients achieving efficacy endpoints at week 12 (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]50 and ACR70), 16 and 24 (sIGA0/1) increased with increasing upadacitinib average plasma concentration over a dosing interval, whereas no clear exposure‐response trend was observed for ACR20 at week 12 or ACR20/50/70 at week 24 within the range of plasma exposures evaluated in the phase III PsA studies. No clear trends for exposure‐response relationships were identified for experiencing pneumonia, herpes zoster infection, hemoglobin less than 8 g/dl, lymphopenia (grade ≥ 3), or neutropenia (grade ≥ 3) after 24 weeks of treatment. Shallow relationships with plasma exposures were observed for serious infections and hemoglobin decrease greater than 2 g/dl from baseline at week 24. Based on exposure‐response analyses, the upadacitinib 15 mg q.d. regimen is predicted to achieve robust efficacy in patients with PsA and to be associated with limited incidences of reductions in hemoglobin or occurrence of serious infections.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Upadacitinib: Review of Data Relevant to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Indication

Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor developed for treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication in adults who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate. Upadacitinib is currently under regulatory review by other agencies around the world. Ongoing trials are investigating the use of upadacitinib in other inflammatory autoimmune diseases. In this article, we review the clinical pharmacokinetic data available to date for upadacitinib that supported the clinical development program in RA and ultimately regulatory applications for upadacitinib in treatment of patients with moderate to severe RA.

Upadacitinib: First Approval

Upadacitinib (Rinvoq™), an orally-administered Janus kinase 1 (JAK-1) inhibitor, is being developed by AbbVie for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In August 2019, based on positive results from multinational phase III trials conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, upadacitinib received marketing approval in the USA for the treatment of moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of upadacitinib leading to this first approval for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Exposure-Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Phase II and III Studies to Support Benefit-Risk Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Exposure–response analyses of upadacitinib (UPA) key efficacy and safety end points (3,685 and 4,577 subjects for efficacy and safety, respectively) using data from phase II and phase III rheumatoid arthritis (RA) studies were conducted to support benefit–risk assessment. Percentage of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70, disease activity score 28 (C‐reactive protein) (DAS28‐CRP) ≤ 3.2, and DAS28‐CRP < 2.6 increased with increasing UPA plasma exposures. With the small number of observed safety events, no clear trends for exposure–response relationships were identified for pneumonia, herpes zoster infection, changes in platelet count, lymphopenia (Grade ≥ 4), or neutropenia (Grade ≥ 3) up to Week 26. Shallow exposure–response relationships were observed for > 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin, lymphopenia Grade ≥ 3 at Week 12/14, and serious infections at Week 24/26. Exposure–efficacy analyses demonstrate that UPA 15 mg q.d. (once daily) dose provided the optimal benefit–risk in RA through maximizing efficacy with only small incremental benefit with 30 mg q.d.; and with consistency across RA subpopulations and with UPA monotherapy or combination with conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs.