Factors Affecting Contraception Access and Use in Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

Buprenorphine and postpartum contraception utilization among people with opioid use disorder: a multi-state analysis

BACKGROUND

The postpartum period provides an opportunity for birthing people with opioid use disorder (OUD) to consider their future reproductive health goals. However, the relationship between the use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and contraception utilization is not well understood. We used multistate administrative claims data to compare contraception utilization rates among postpartum people with OUD initiating buprenorphine (BUP) versus no medication (psychosocial services receipt without MOUD (PSY)) in the United States (US).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Multi-State Medicaid Databases 2016-2021 among postpartum women with OUD who did and did not initiate BUP during pregnancy. Our primary outcome was the receipt of prescribed highly-effective or effective contraception by 90 days postpartum. Highly-effective contraception was defined as female sterilization and long-acting reversible contraception [LARC]). Effective contraception was defined as oral contraceptive pills [OCPs], the contraceptive patch, ring, or injection. We used multivariable Poisson regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, to measure the association of BUP (vs. PSY) on postpartum contraception utilization.

RESULTS

Our sample consisted of 11,118 postpartum people with OUD. Among those, 3,443 initiated BUP and 7,675 received PSY. By 90 days postpartum, 22.4% (n = 2,487) of the cohort were prescribed contraception (21.5% PSY vs. 24.3% BUP). Among these participants, most received LARC (41.0%), followed by female sterilization (27.3%), the contraceptive injection (17.3%), pills (8.6%), ring (4.7%), and patch (1.0%), Compared to people engaged in PSY, BUP receipt was associated with a greater use of prescribed contraceptive use by 90 days postpartum (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.17[1.07-1.28]), including a modestly greater use of the patch, ring, and pills, (aRR = 1.13[1.08-1.18]), but a modestly lesser use of injection contraception (aRR = 0.95[0.91-0.99]). There was no relationship observed between BUP and LARC use (aRR = 1.00[0.95-1.04]) and female sterilization (aRR = 1.01[0.98-1.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 22% of pregnant people with OUD in our cohort used effective or highly-effective postpartum contraception. BUP receipt during pregnancy, relative to PSY, was associated with modestly greater use of prescribed effective contraceptive methods but was not associated with greater use of provider-administered contraceptive methods, such as the contraceptive injection, LARC and female sterilization.

Trends in maternal opioid use: Statewide differences by sociodemographic characteristics in Florida from 2000 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Maternal opioid use (MOU) remains a public health concern. Studies have demonstrated significant increases in MOU, but estimates using ICD-10-CM or stratified by sociodemographic variables are limited.

OBJECTIVES

Using a statewide, population-based dataset of Florida resident deliveries from 2000 to 2019, we examined the trend of MOU by age, race/ethnicity, education level, and insurance.

METHODS

Florida administrative data was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. MOU was identified using opioid-related hospital discharge diagnoses documented prenatally or at delivery. Maternal sociodemographic variables were obtained from Florida vital statistics. Joinpoint regression was used to identify statistically significant changes in the trends overall and stratified by sociodemographic variables. Results are presented as annual percentage changes (APC) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Our sample included over 3.6 million Florida resident mothers; of which, MOU was identified in 1% (n = 22,828) of the sample. From 2000 to 2019, MOU increased over ten-fold from 8.7 to 94.7 per 10,000 live birth deliveries. MOU increased significantly from 2000 to 2011 (APC: 32.8; 95% CI: 29.4, 36.2), remained stable from 2011 to 2016, and decreased significantly from 2016 to 2019 (APC: 3.9; 95% CI: -6.6, -1.0). However, from 2016 to 2019, MOU increased among non-Hispanic Black mothers (APC: 9.2; 95% CI: 7.5, 11.0), and those ages 30-34 (APC: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.6) and 35-39 (APC: 6.4; 95% CI: 4.3, 8.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate prevalence estimates of MOU by sociodemographic factors are necessary to fully understand prevalence trends, describe the burden among sub-populations, and develop targeted interventions.

Contraceptive uptake in postpartum people with and without opioid use disorder and opioid use with co-occurring substance use

Background

Using contraception to delay pregnancy allows people with opioid use disorder (OUD) to choose when they are ready to continue their families. Yet, postpartum contraceptive uptake among people with OUD has not been well characterized.

Methods

Analyses used 73,811 pregnancy episodes among 61,221 people (2016-2021) from the St. Louis University-SSM Virtual Data Warehouse. OUD was defined from the year prior and through pregnancy. Contraceptive uptake was defined within 90-days after delivery. We used Generalized Estimating Equations-type multinomial logit models to assess association of OUD +/- co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs) with any contraception (yes/no) and type of contraception (effective - pills, patch, ring, injection; or highly effective - long-acting reversible, LARC methods [intrauterine device, implant] and sterilization).

Results

The sample was 66.0 % white and average age was 27.7 years (±5.6). 32.5 % of pregnancies were followed by contraception initiation, 2.3 % had an OUD diagnosis, and 1.3 % OUD with co-occurring SUD. There was no association between OUD and postpartum contraception receipt, but OUD was associated with decreased highly effective compared to effective method initiation (aOR=0.76; 95 % CI: [0.64-0.91]). OUD plus co-occurring SUD was associated with decreased uptake across all contraception types (aOR=0.81[0.70-0.93]), specifically, highly-effective methods (aOR=0.48[0.38-0.61]).

Conclusions

Overall postpartum contraception uptake among people with OUD is comparable to uptake in the non-OUD population. People with OUD plus co-occurring SUDs are particularly unlikely to receive contraception. The reasons people choose contraceptive methods are complex and may differ by SUD severity. More information is needed to understand factors that impact postpartum contraception initiation.

"He gets mad that I'm sober": Experiences of substance use coercion among postpartum women in recovery

PURPOSE

The number of women with substance use disorders (SUDs) is growing in the U.S. Many women with SUDs are of childbearing age, and studies show that women who abstain from substance use during pregnancy often relapse in the postpartum period. Given the high overlap between substance use and intimate partner violence, these women may be in relationships that make recovery more challenging. This study aimed to better understand how substance abuse coercion in intimate relationships may affect substance use and to identify and describe the presence of substance use coercion in postpartum women.

METHODS

The study conducted qualitative interviews with 30 women with substance use disorders who had given birth within the past six months. Researchers recruited women from a larger intervention study providing home visit support to postpartum women in substance use recovery. Thematic analysis was then identified overarching themes in the interview data.

RESULTS

Analysis of the impact of IPV on substance use revealed four themes: 1) sabotaging sobriety, 2) making substance use a condition of the relationship, 3) portraying her as a "bad mom," and 4) furthering social isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings showed that women with SUDs have specific vulnerabilities that partners may exploit as a way of exerting control. Implications for practice with postpartum women who are working toward recovery are discussed.

Beyond the brink: Unraveling the opioid crisis and its profound impacts

This paper examines the long-standing and severe public health crisis, the opioid epidemic in the United States, which has been worsening since the mid-1990s. In contrast to previous research, it investigates the broader impacts of this epidemic, particularly on family members and healthcare systems. Using a comprehensive dataset spanning from 1998 to 2010, the study analyzes opioid use at the three-digit ZIP code level, utilizing data from the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and individual-level data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in a two-way fixed effect model. The findings reveal significant negative effects on family caregivers, notably adult children, due to the opioid epidemic. Additionally, opioid exposure is associated with increased healthcare utilization, including home health care and hospital use. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted consequences of the opioid epidemic.

Inclusion of Sex and Gender Differences in U.S. State Action Plans for Opioid Use and Opioid Use Disorder

Background: States have developed action plans to address the "opioid crisis" over the past several years. While sex- and gender-based differences have been identified in complications of opioid use, risks of addiction to opioids, barriers to treatment of opioid use disorder, and associated stigma, it is unknown if or to what extent opioid plans consider or account for these differences. The objectives of this study were to analyze U.S. state opioid action plans and their inclusion of sex- and gender-specific concerns. Methods: A content analysis of 49 state plans was conducted in June 2020, assessing their inclusion of 14 variables covering provider education, pregnancy-related, and sex- or gender-based differences in opioid addiction and treatment. Results: Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome was the most common variable, noted in 57% of plans. Only 14% included pregnancy-related stigma, and 4% identified gender-specific stigma. Contraceptives and family-planning were included in 12% and 10% of plans, respectively. Two states included more than half of the variables and five plans made no mention of sex or gender differences. Conclusions: Few state plans contained sex- or gender-specific information, and those that did focused almost exclusively on childbearing, excluding other unique considerations of opioid-using-women of all ages. The results of this study could improve the care of women using opioids by informing the strategies of state agencies and impacting legislative efforts for prevention initiatives, substance use disorder treatment, and law enforcement programs.

Contraception and Healthcare Utilization by Reproductive-Age Women Who Use Drugs in Rural Communities: a Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Women who use drugs (WWUD) have low rates of contraceptive use and high rates of unintended pregnancy. Drug use is common among women in rural U.S. communities, with limited data on how they utilize reproductive, substance use disorder (SUD), and healthcare services.

OBJECTIVE

We determined contraceptive use prevalence among WWUD in rural communities then compared estimates to women from similar rural areas. We investigated characteristics of those using contraceptives, and associations between contraceptive use and SUD treatment, healthcare utilization, and substance use.

DESIGN

Rural Opioids Initiative (ROI) - cross-sectional survey using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) involving eight rural U.S. regions (January 2018-March 2020); National Survey on Family Growth (NSFG) - nationally-representative U.S. household reproductive health survey (2017-2019).

PARTICIPANTS

Women aged 18-49 with prior 30-day non-prescribed opioid and/or non-opioid injection drug use; fecundity determined by self-reported survey responses.

MAIN MEASURES

Unweighted and RDS-weighted prevalence estimates of medical/procedural contraceptive use; chi-squared tests and multi-level linear regressions to test associations.

KEY RESULTS

Of 855 women in the ROI, 36.8% (95% CI 33.7-40.1, unweighted) and 38.6% (95% CI 30.7-47.2, weighted) reported contraceptive use, compared to 66% of rural women in the NSFG sample. Among the ROI women, 27% had received prior 30-day SUD treatment via outpatient counseling or inpatient program and these women had increased odds of contraceptive use (aOR 1.50 [95% CI 1.08-2.06]). There was a positive association between contraception use and recent medications for opioid use disorder (aOR 1.34 [95% CI 0.95-1.88]) and prior 6-month primary care utilization (aOR 1.32 [95% CI 0.96-1.82]) that did not meet the threshold for statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

WWUD in rural areas reported low contraceptive use; those who recently received SUD treatment had greater odds of contraceptive use. Improvements are needed in expanding reproductive and preventive health within SUD treatment and primary care services in rural communities.

Provider Perspectives of Barriers to Contraceptive Access and Use among Women with Substance Use Disorders

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies conducted from the patient perspective indicate that women with substance use disorders (SUDs) experience extensive barriers to contraceptive access and use (CAU), but there is limited research investigating this topic from the provider perspective. We explored provider perspectives on the barriers to CAU for women with SUDs. As a secondary objective, we highlighted provider contraceptive counseling strategies to address patient CAU barriers.

METHODS

We conducted 24 qualitative interviews with a purposeful sample of women's health providers, including medical doctors, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse-midwives. We used thematic analysis to code the interviews with inductive codes and organized findings according to levels of influence within the Dahlgren and Whitehead rainbow model, a socioecological model of health.

RESULTS

Provider-reported barriers to CAU were identified at four levels of socioecological influence and included reproductive misconceptions; active substance use; trauma, interpersonal violence, and reproductive coercion; limited social support; lack of housing, employment, health insurance, and transportation; stigma; discrimination; and punitive prenatal substance use policies and child welfare reporting requirements. Strategies for addressing CAU barriers mainly focused on patient-centered communication, including open information exchange, shared decision-making, and relationship building. However, providers described disproportionately highlighting the benefits of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and directing conversations toward LARC when they perceived that such methods would help patients to overcome adherence and other challenges related to active substance use or logistical barriers. Notably, there was no mention of CAU facilitators during the interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers perceived that women with SUDs experience a range of CAU barriers, which they addressed within the clinical setting through use of both patient-centered communication and highlighting the benefits of LARC when they perceived that such methods would help clients to overcome barriers. Improving CAU for women with SUDs will require multidisciplinary, multipronged strategies that prioritize reproductive autonomy and are implemented across clinical, community, and policy settings.