Effects of Strong CYP3A Inhibition and Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor: Results of Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma and a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Analysis

In vitro demonstration of antedrug mechanism of a pharmacokinetic booster to improve CYP3A4 substrates by CYP3A4-mediated metabolism inhibition

We previously reported novel benzyl-ether derivatives with an imidazole ring and a hydroxyl group (A-01) or carboxyl group (B-01) and esters (2 esters of A-01, and 7 esters of B-01) as pharmacokinetics (PK) boosters. This study demonstrates how these ester compounds embody the concept of a safe pharmacokinetic booster, with potent and transient inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism. As a model CYP3A4 substrate and CYP3A4 enzyme, midazolam (MDZ) and rat liver microsomes were used. A-01 inhibited MDZ metabolism significantly, while B-01 induced only slight inhibition. Although rat liver microsomes hydrolyzed the ester compounds over time, several ester compounds strongly inhibited MDZ metabolism. Due to the significant activity of A-01, A-01 esters affected MDZ metabolism, irrespective of hydrolysis state. Time-dependent inhibition evaluation indicated that the B-01 ester inhibition is not mechanism-based, as hydrolysis eliminated MDZ metabolism inhibition. We report that the B-01 esters significantly inhibit CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism, and upon hydrolysis this property is eliminated. In conclusion, B-01 ester compounds may be safe PK boosters with antedrug characteristics.

Current Drug Delivery Strategies for Buccal Cavity Ailments using Mouth Dissolving Wafer Technology: A Comprehensive Review on the Present State of the Art

BACKGROUND

Mouth-dissolving wafer is polymer-based matrice that incorporates various pharmaceutical agents for oral drug delivery. This polymeric wafer is ingenious in the way that it needs not be administered with water, like in conventional tablet dosage form. It has better compliance among the pediatric and geriatric groups owing to its ease of administration.

OBJECTIVE

The polymeric wafer dissolves quickly in the oral cavity and is highly effective for a targeted local effect in buccal-specific ailments. It is a safe, effective, and versatile drug delivery carrier for a range of drugs used to treat a plethora of oral cavity-specific ailments that inflict common people, like thrush, canker sores, periodontal disease, benign oral cavity tumors, buccal neoplasm, and malignancies. This review paper focuses thoroughly on the present state of the art in mouth-dissolving wafer technology for buccal drug delivery and targeting. Moreover, we have also addressed present-time limitations associated with wafer technology to aid researchers in future developments in the arena of buccal drug delivery.

CONCLUSION

This dynamic novel formulation has tremendous future implications for designing drug delivery systems to target pernicious ailments and diseases specific to the buccal mucosa. In a nutshell, this review paper aims to summarize the present state of the art in buccal targeted drug delivery.

Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling in the research of small-molecule targeted anti-cancer drugs

INTRODUCTION

Physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) models are increasingly used in the drug research and development, especially in anti-cancer drugs. Between 2001 and 2020, a total of 89 small-molecule targeted antitumor drugs were approved in China and the United States, some of which already included PBPK modeling in their application or approval packages. This article intended to review the prevalence and application of PBPK model in these drugs.

METHOD

Article search was performed in the PubMed to collect English research articles on small-molecule targeted anti-cancer drugs using PBPK modeling. The selected articles were classified into nine categorizes according to the application areas and further analyzed.

RESULT

From 2001 to 2020, more than 60% of small-molecule targeted anti-cancer drugs (54/89) were studied using PBPK model with a wide range of application. Ninety research articles were included, of which 48 involved enzyme-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI). Of these retrieved articles, Simcyp, GastroPlus, and PK-Sim were the most widely model building platforms, which account for 63.8%, 15.2%, and 8.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PBPK modeling is commonly and widely used to research small-molecule targeted anti-cancer drugs.

Bortezomib Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Review and Future Perspectives

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological neoplasm for which different chemotherapy treatments are used with several drugs in combination. One of the most frequently used drugs for the treatment of MM is the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Patients treated with bortezomib are at increased risk for thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, gastrointestinal toxicities, peripheral neuropathy, infection, and fatigue. This drug is almost entirely metabolized by cytochrome CYP450 isoenzymes and transported by the efflux pump P-glycoprotein. Genes encoding both enzymes and transporters involved in the bortezomib pharmacokinetic pathway are highly polymorphic. The response to bortezomib and the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) vary among patients, which could be due to interindividual variations in these possible pharmacogenetic biomarkers. In this review, we compiled all pharmacogenetic information relevant to the treatment of MM with bortezomib. In addition, we discuss possible future perspectives and the analysis of potential pharmacogenetic markers that could influence the incidence of ADR and the toxicity of bortezomib. It would be a milestone in the field of targeted therapy for MM to relate potential biomarkers to the various effects of bortezomib on patients.

An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for multiple myeloma (MM) have rapidly expanded over the past few years with several newly approved drugs. While there is need to explore treatments that lead to longer responses and survival, special consideration should be given on reducing treatment burden, reducing toxicities, and improving quality of life. Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of MM, combining clinical efficacy with a favorable safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we discuss the clinical efficacy and safety of ixazomib. Pharmacokinetic considerations, management of common toxicities, and the impact of the drug on the current and future treatment strategies are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Ixazomib is an effective and welltolerated MM drug. It is also being studied in combination with other newer agents. It does not have long-term cumulative toxicities, and the most adverse events are mild and manageable. These findings, along with the ease of oral administration, make it a possible option for long-term treatment approaches for MM patients, as well as in the frail/elderly patient population.

Prediction of pyrotinib exposure based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model and endogenous biomarker

Pyrotinib, a novel irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is mainly (about 90%) eliminated through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A mediated metabolism in vivo. Meanwhile, genotype is a key factor affecting pyrotinib clearance and 4β-hydroxycholesterol is an endogenous biomarker of CYP3A activity that can indirectly reflect the possible pyrotinib exposure. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate the clinical drug-drug interactions (DDI) between CYP3A perpetrators and pyrotinib, understand potential exposure in specific populations including liver impairment and geriatric populations, and explore the possible relationships among pyrotinib exposure, genotypes and endogenous biomarker. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model can be used to replace prospective DDI studies and evaluate external and internal factors that may influence system exposure. Herein, a basic PBPK model was firstly developed to evaluate the potential risk of pyrotinib coadministration with strong inhibitor and guide the clinical trial design. Subsequently, the mechanistic PBPK model was established and used to quantitatively estimate the potential DDI risk for other CYP3A modulators, understand the potential exposure of specific populations, including liver impairment and geriatric populations. Meanwhile, the possible relationships among pyrotinib exposure, genotypes and endogenous biomarker were explored. With the help of PBPK model, the DDI clinical trial of pyrotinib coadministration with strong inhibitor has been successfully completed, some DDI clinical trials may be waived based on the predicted results and clinical trials in specific populations can be reasonably designed. Moreover, the mutant genotypes of CYP3A4*18A and CYP3A5*3 were likely to have a limited influence on pyrotinib clearance, and the genotype-independent linear correlation coefficient between endogenous biomarker and system exposure was larger than 0.6. Therefore, based on the reliable predicted results and the linear correlations between pyrotinib exposure and endogenous biomarker, dosage adjustment of pyrotinib can be designed for clinical practice.

Phase 1 study to evaluate the effects of rifampin on pharmacokinetics of pevonedistat, a NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors

Pevonedistat (TAK-924/MLN4924) is an investigational small molecule inhibitor of the NEDD8-activating enzyme that has demonstrated clinical activity across solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Here we report the results of a phase 1 study evaluating the effect of rifampin, a strong CYP3A inducer, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pevonedistat in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03486314). Patients received a single 50 mg/m² pevonedistat dose via a 1-h infusion on Days 1 (in the absence of rifampin) and 10 (in the presence of rifampin), and daily oral dosing of rifampin 600 mg on Days 3-11. Twenty patients were enrolled and were evaluable for PK and safety. Following a single dose of pevonedistat at 50 mg/m², the mean terminal half-life of pevonedistat was 5.7 and 7.4 h in the presence and in the absence of rifampin, respectively. The geometric mean AUC_0-inf of pevonedistat in the presence of rifampin was 79% of that without rifampin (90% CI: 69.2%-90.2%). The geometric mean C_max of pevonedistat in the presence of rifampin was similar to that in the absence of rifampin (96.2%; 90% CI: 79.2%-117%). Coadministration of pevonedistat with rifampin, a strong metabolic enzyme inducer, did not result in clinically meaningful decreases in systemic exposures of pevonedistat. The study results support the recommendation that no pevonedistat dose adjustment is needed for patients receiving concomitant CYP3A inducers. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03486314.

Recent Research Progress of Chiral Small Molecular Antitumor-Targeted Drugs Approved by the FDA From 2011 to 2019

Chiral drugs usually contain chiral centers, which are present as single enantiomers or racemates. Compared with achiral drugs, they have significant advantages in safety and efficacy with high stereoselectivity. Of these drugs, chirality not only exerts influence on the solubility and pharmacokinetic characteristics but also has specific mechanistic characteristics on their targets. We noted that small molecules with unique chiral properties have emerged as novel components of antitumor drugs approved by the FDA in decade. Since approved, these drugs have been continuously explored for new indications, new mechanisms, and novel combinations. In this mini review, recent research progress of twenty-two FDA-approved chiral small molecular-targeted antitumor drugs from 2011 to 2019 is summarized with highlighting the potential and advantages of their applications. We believe that these updated achievements may provide theoretical foundation and stimulate research interests for optimizing drug efficacy, expanding clinical application, overcoming drug resistance, and advancing safety in future clinical administrations of these chiral targeted drugs.

A Review of CYP3A Drug-Drug Interaction Studies: Practical Guidelines for Patients Using Targeted Oral Anticancer Drugs

Many oral anticancer drugs are metabolized by CYP3A. Clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies often only examine the effect of strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers. The effect of moderate or weak inhibitors or inducers can be examined using physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulations, but data from these simulations are not always available early after approval of a drug. In this review we provide recommendations for clinical practice on how to deal with DDIs of oral anticancer drugs if only data from strong CYP3A inhibitors or inducers is available. These recommendations were based on reviewed data of oral anticancer drugs primarily metabolized by CYP3A and approved for the treatment of solid tumors from January 1st, 2013 to December 31st, 2015. In addition, three drugs that were registered before the new EMA guideline was issued (i.e., everolimus, imatinib, and sunitinib), were reviewed. DDIs are often complex, but if no data is available from moderate CYP3A inhibitors/inducers, a change in exposure of 50% compared with strong inhibitors/inducers can be assumed. No a priori dose adaptations are indicated for weak inhibitors/inducers, because their interacting effect is small. In case pharmacologically active metabolites are involved, the metabolic pathway, the ratio of the parent to the metabolites, and the potency of the metabolites should be taken into account.

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict Potential Drug-Drug Interactions and Inform Dosing of Acumapimod, an Oral p38 MAPK Inhibitor

Acumapimod, an investigational oral p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase inhibitor for treatment during severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and is a P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp) substrate. Concerns about drug–drug interactions (DDIs) have meant patients receiving drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 were ineligible for acumapimod trials. We report on how 2 acumapimod clinical DDI studies and a physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model assessing how co‐administration of a weak (azithromycin) and strong (itraconazole) CYP3A4 inhibitor affected acumapimod systemic exposure, informed decision making and supported concomitant use of CYP3A4 and P‐gp inhibitors. Studies MBCT102 and MBCT103, respectively, demonstrated that co‐administration of azithromycin or itraconazole had no clinically meaningful impact on acumapimod pharmacokinetics. Findings were consistent with PBPK model results. Safety profiles were similar when acumapimod was co‐administered with azithromycin or itraconazole. These studies highlight the value of PBPK modeling in drug development, and its potential to inform DDI investigations.

How Can Drug Metabolism and Transporter Genetics Inform Psychotropic Prescribing?

Many genetic variants in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters have been shown to be relevant for treating psychiatric disorders. Associations are strong enough to feature on drug labels and for prescribing guidelines based on such data. A range of commercial tests are available; however, there is variability in included genetic variants, methodology, and interpretation. We herein provide relevant background for understanding clinical associations with specific variants, other factors that are relevant to consider when interpreting such data (such as age, gender, drug-drug interactions), and summarize the data relevant to clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry and the available prescribing guidelines. We also highlight areas for future research focus in this field.

Inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes in humans: an update

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme family is the most important enzyme system catalyzing the phase 1 metabolism of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics such as herbal remedies and toxic compounds in the environment. The inhibition and induction of CYPs are major mechanisms causing pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. This review presents a comprehensive update on the inhibitors and inducers of the specific CYP enzymes in humans. The focus is on the more recent human in vitro and in vivo findings since the publication of our previous review on this topic in 2008. In addition to the general presentation of inhibitory drugs and inducers of human CYP enzymes by drugs, herbal remedies, and toxic compounds, an in-depth view on tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and antiretroviral HIV medications as victims and perpetrators of drug–drug interactions is provided as examples of the current trends in the field. Also, a concise overview of the mechanisms of CYP induction is presented to aid the understanding of the induction phenomena.

Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prolonged survival and expanded treatment options in myeloma patients have led to adverse events associated with treatment getting increased attention. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the incidence of ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) and to compare the rates of ixazomib-associated CVAEs and related therapies. CVAEs were defined as heart failure, hypertension, ischemia, and arrhythmia. All-grade and high-grade CVAEs and study characteristics were recorded. A total of 266 potentially relevant articles were identified, and 246 were excluded after review. Twenty studies of 1715 patients with multiple myeloma were thus considered in this study. The estimated rates of all-grade and high-grade ixazomib associated CVAEs were 11.2 and 3.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that median age ≥65 years, none phase 1 trial and combination regimen were associated with higher rates of high-grade ixazomib associated CVAEs. Ixazomib was association with increased high-grade CVAEs risk (RR = 1.679, 95% CI: 1.078-2.615, P = 0.022). Ixazomib was associated with a significant rate of high-grade CVAEs. Future studies are needed to identify patients at high risk for high-grade CVAEs.

Renal Involvement in Systemic Amyloidosis Caused by Monoclonal Immunoglobulins

Kidney involvement in immunoglobulin-related amyloidosis (AIg) is common. Although patients with renal-limited AIg tend not to have the high mortality that patients with cardiac amyloidosis have, they do experience significant morbidity and impact on quality of life. The complexity of the pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. Models have been established to prognosticate and assess for the response to therapy. Patients with advanced renal impairment from immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis still have poor renal prognosis, and better therapy is needed in order to preserve kidney function. Patients who develop end-stage renal disease can undergo renal replacement therapy with kidney transplantation.

The proteasome as a druggable target with multiple therapeutic potentialities: Cutting and non-cutting edges

Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) is an adaptable and finely tuned system that sustains proteostasis network under a large variety of physiopathological conditions. Its dysregulation is often associated with the onset and progression of human diseases; hence, UPS modulation has emerged as a promising new avenue for the development of treatments of several relevant pathologies, such as cancer and neurodegeneration. The clinical interest in proteasome inhibition has considerably increased after the FDA approval in 2003 of bortezomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, which is now used in the front-line setting. Thereafter, two other proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib and ixazomib), designed to overcome resistance to bortezomib, have been approved for treatment-experienced patients, and a variety of novel inhibitors are currently under preclinical and clinical investigation not only for haematological malignancies but also for solid tumours. However, since UPS collapse leads to toxic misfolded proteins accumulation, proteasome is attracting even more interest as a target for the care of neurodegenerative diseases, which are sustained by UPS impairment. Thus, conceptually, proteasome activation represents an innovative and largely unexplored target for drug development. According to a multidisciplinary approach, spanning from chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology to pharmacology, this review will summarize the most recent available literature regarding different aspects of proteasome biology, focusing on structure, function and regulation of proteasome in physiological and pathological processes, mostly cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, connecting biochemical features and clinical studies of proteasome targeting drugs.

An Open-Label Phase 1 Study to Determine the Effect of Lenvatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam, a CYP3A4 Substrate, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits enzyme activity but induces gene expression of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), an important enzyme for drug metabolism. We evaluated the impact of lenvatinib on CYP3A4 using midazolam as a probe substrate in patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine the pharmacokinetic effects of lenvatinib on midazolam, and the secondary objective was to assess the safety of lenvatinib.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1 study involved patients with advanced cancer that progressed after treatment with approved therapies or for which no standard therapies were available.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, coadministration of lenvatinib decreased the geometric mean ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve for midazolam on day 1 to 0.914 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.850-0.983) but increased it on day 14 to 1.148 (90% CI 0.938-1.404). Coadministration of lenvatinib also decreased the geometric mean ratio of the maximum observed concentration for midazolam on day 1 to 0.862 (90% CI 0.753-0.988) but increased it on day 14 to 1.027 (90% CI 0.852-1.238). There was little change in the terminal elimination phase half-life of midazolam when administered with lenvatinib. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (20.0%), fatigue (16.7%), and diarrhea (10.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of lenvatinib had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a CYP3A4 substrate. The adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of lenvatinib, and no new safety concerns were identified. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02686164.

Clobetasol Propionate Is a Heme-Mediated Selective Inhibitor of Human Cytochrome P450 3A5

The human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 metabolize most drugs and have high similarities in their structure and substrate preference. Whereas CYP3A4 is predominantly expressed in the liver, CYP3A5 is upregulated in cancer, contributing to drug resistance. Selective inhibitors of CYP3A5 are, therefore, critical to validating it as a therapeutic target. Here we report clobetasol propionate (clobetasol) as a potent and selective CYP3A5 inhibitor identified by high-throughput screening using enzymatic and cell-based assays. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest a close proximity of clobetasol to the heme in CYP3A5 but not in CYP3A4. UV-visible spectroscopy and electron paramagnetic resonance analyses confirmed the formation of an inhibitory type I heme-clobetasol complex in CYP3A5 but not in CYP3A4, thus explaining the CYP3A5 selectivity of clobetasol. Our results provide a structural basis for selective CYP3A5 inhibition, along with mechanistic insights, and highlight clobetasol as an important chemical tool for target validation.

Perspectives from the Innovation and Quality Consortium Induction Working Group on Factors Impacting Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions Resulting from Induction: Focus on Cytochrome 3A Substrates

A recent publication from the Innovation and Quality Consortium Induction Working Group collated a large clinical data set with the goal of evaluating the accuracy of drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction from in vitro data. Somewhat surprisingly, comparison across studies of the mean- or median-reported area under the curve ratio showed appreciable variability in the magnitude of outcome. This commentary explores the possible drivers of this range of outcomes observed in clinical induction studies. While recommendations on clinical study design are not being proposed, some key observations were informative during the aggregate analysis of clinical data. Although DDI data are often presented using median data, individual data would enable evaluation of how differences in study design, baseline expression, and the number of subjects contribute. Since variability in perpetrator pharmacokinetics (PK) could impact the overall DDI interpretation, should this be routinely captured? Maximal induction was typically observed after 5-7 days of dosing. Thus, when the half-life of the inducer is less than 30 hours, are there benefits to a more standardized study design? A large proportion of CYP3A4 inducers were also CYP3A4 inhibitors and/or inactivators based on in vitro data. In these cases, using CYP3A selective substrates has limitations. More intensive monitoring of changes in area under the curve over time is warranted. With selective CYP3A substrates, the net effect was often inhibition, whereas less selective substrates could discern induction through mechanisms not susceptible to inhibition. The latter included oral contraceptives, which raise concerns of reduced efficacy following induction. Alternative approaches for modeling induction, such as applying biomarkers and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK), are also considered. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The goal of this commentary is to stimulate discussion on whether there are opportunities to optimize clinical drug-drug interaction study design. The overall aim is to reduce, understand and contextualize the variability observed in the magnitude of induction across reported clinical studies. A large clinical CYP3A induction dataset was collected and further analyzed to identify trends and gaps. Reporting individual victim PK data, characterizing perpetrator PK and including additional PK assessments for mixed-mechanism perpetrators may provide insights into how these factors impact differences observed in clinical outcomes. The potential utility of biomarkers and PBPK modeling are discussed in considering future directions.

Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Assess the Effect of Cytochrome P450 Inhibition and Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of the Novel Cereblon Modulator Avadomide (CC-122) in Healthy Adult Subjects

Avadomide (CC‐122) is a novel immunomodulatory drug that binds to cereblon, a member of the Cullin 4‐RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Avadomide has multiple pharmacologic activities including potent immune modulation, antiangiogenic, antitumor, and antiproliferative activity and is being evaluated as an oncology treatment for hematologic malignancies and advanced solid tumors. In vitro study has indicated that cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and CYP1A2 appear to be the major enzymes involved in the oxidative metabolism of avadomide. The effects of CYP3A inhibition/induction and CYP1A2 inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of avadomide in healthy adult subjects were assessed in 3 parts of an open‐label, nonrandomized, 2‐period, single‐sequence crossover study. Following a single oral dose of 3 mg, avadomide exposure when coadministered with the CYP1A2 inhibitor fluvoxamine was 154.81% and 107.59% of that when administered alone, for area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_0‐inf) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max), respectively. Avadomide exposures, when coadministered with the CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole, were 100.0% and 93.64% of that when administered alone, for AUC_0‐inf and C_max, respectively. Avadomide exposures when coadministered with the CYP3A inducer rifampin were 62.83% and 88.17% of that when administered alone, for AUC_0‐inf and C_max, respectively. Avadomide was well tolerated when administered as a single oral dose of 3 mg alone or coadministered with fluvoxamine, itraconazole, or rifampin. These results should serve as the basis for avadomide dose recommendations when it is coadministered with strong CYP3A and CYP1A2 inhibitors and with rifampin.

Clinical Pharmacology of Ixazomib: The First Oral Proteasome Inhibitor

Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor, is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least one prior therapy. Ixazomib is a selective, potent, and reversible inhibitor of the 20S proteasome, and preferentially binds to and inhibits the β5 chymotrypsin-like proteolytic site. Ixazomib absorption is rapid, with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration of approximately 1 h post-dose. Ixazomib pharmacokinetics (PK) are adequately described by a three-compartment model (terminal half-life of 9.5 days) with first-order linear absorption (oral bioavailability of 58%). Plasma exposures of ixazomib increase in a dose-proportional manner. A high-fat meal decreases both the rate and extent of ixazomib absorption, supporting administration on an empty stomach. Population PK analyses demonstrated that no dose adjustment is required based on age, body size/weight, race, sex, mild-to-moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment. Results from dedicated studies indicate that a reduced starting dose (from 4 to 3 mg) is appropriate for patients with severe renal impairment, end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis, or moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment. Non-cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism appears to be the major clearance mechanism for ixazomib. Drug-drug interaction studies have shown no meaningful effects of strong inhibitors of CYP3A on ixazomib PK; however, the strong inducer rifampin caused a clinically relevant reduction in ixazomib exposure, supporting the recommendation to avoid concomitant administration of ixazomib with strong CYP3A inducers. Exposure-response analyses of data from the phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 registrational study demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile for the approved dose and regimen of weekly ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle.

Oral oncolytic and antiretroviral therapy administration: dose adjustments, drug interactions, and other considerations for clinical use

The rise in non-AIDS defining cancers (NADCs) is emerging as a leading cause of death for HIV and cancer patients. To address this, current literature and guidelines suggest the continuation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) with oral oncolytic agents to prevent adverse complications associated with HIV disease progression. However, such an approach has the potential for drug-drug interactions and adverse events for patients on such therapy. Further, recommendations on how to adjust these medications, when used concomitantly, are limited. As such, our purpose is to evaluate existing literature through such means as drug databases (e.g. Micromedex, Lexi-Comp, etc.) and package inserts along with PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to develop a reference tool for providers to utilize when there is a decision to treat a patient with ART and oral oncolytic agents concurrently. Our findings suggest that there are many drug interactions that should be taken into consideration with dual therapy. Metabolism is a key determinant of dose adjustment, and many oncolytic agents and ART agents must have their dose adjusted as such. Most notably, several tyrosine kinase inhibitors require dose increases when used with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) but must be decreased when used concomitantly with protease inhibitors (PIs) and cobicistat. Further findings suggest that certain agents should not be used together, which include, but are not limited to, such combinations as bosutinib with NNRTIs, cobicistat, or PIs; idelalisib with maraviroc or PIs; neratinib with NNRTIs, cobicistat, or PIs; and venetoclax with NNRTIs. Overall, the most prominent oncolytic drug interactions were discovered when such agents were used concomitantly with PIs, cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir, or NNRTIs. Future studies are necessary to further evaluate the use of these agents together in disease therapy to generate absolute evidence of such findings. However, from the studies evaluated, much evidence exists to suggest that concomitant therapy is not without drug interactions. As such, clinical decisions regarding concomitant therapy should be evaluated in which the risk and benefit of dual therapy are assessed. Dose adjustments must be made accordingly and in consultation with both HIV and oncology clinicians and pharmacists to reduce the risk for adverse outcomes and disease progression for those with cancer and HIV/AIDS.

Model-Informed Drug Development for Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) was central to the development of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib, facilitating internal decisions (switch from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing, inclusive phase III trials, portfolio prioritization of ixazomib-based combinations, phase III dose for maintenance treatment), regulatory review (model-informed QT analysis, benefit-risk of 4 mg dose), and product labeling (absolute bioavailability and intrinsic/extrinsic factors). This review discusses the impact of MIDD in enabling patient-centric therapeutic optimization during the development of ixazomib.

The future of myeloma precision medicine: integrating the compendium of known drug resistance mechanisms with emerging tumor profiling technologies

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy that is considered mostly incurable in large part due to the inability of standard of care therapies to overcome refractory disease and inevitable drug-resistant relapse. The post-genomic era has been a productive period of discovery where modern sequencing methods have been applied to large MM patient cohorts to modernize our current perception of myeloma pathobiology and establish an appreciation for the vast heterogeneity that exists between and within MM patients. Numerous pre-clinical studies conducted in the last two decades have unveiled a compendium of mechanisms by which malignant plasma cells can escape standard therapies, many of which have potentially quantifiable biomarkers. Exhaustive pre-clinical efforts have evaluated countless putative anti-MM therapeutic agents and many of these have begun to enter clinical trial evaluation. While the palette of available anti-MM therapies is continuing to expand it is also clear that malignant plasma cells still have mechanistic avenues by which they can evade even the most promising new therapies. It is therefore becoming increasingly clear that there is an outstanding need to develop and employ precision medicine strategies in MM management that harness emerging tumor profiling technologies to identify biomarkers that predict efficacy or resistance within an individual's sub-clonally heterogeneous tumor. In this review we present an updated overview of broad classes of therapeutic resistance mechanisms and describe selected examples of putative biomarkers. We also outline several emerging tumor profiling technologies that have the potential to accurately quantify biomarkers for therapeutic sensitivity and resistance at genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic levels. Finally, we comment on the future of implementation for precision medicine strategies in MM and the clear need for a paradigm shift in clinical trial design and disease management.

Biotransformation of [14C]-ixazomib in patients with advanced solid tumors: characterization of metabolite profiles in plasma, urine, and feces

PURPOSE

This metabolite profiling and identification analysis (part of a phase I absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion study) aimed to define biotransformation pathways and evaluate associated inter-individual variability in four patients with advanced solid tumors who received [¹⁴C]-ixazomib.

METHODS

After administration of a single 4.1-mg oral dose of [¹⁴C]-ixazomib (total radioactivity [TRA] ~ 500 nCi), plasma (at selected timepoints), urine, and fecal samples were collected before dosing and continuously over 0-168-h postdose, followed by intermittent collections on days 14, 21, 28, and 35. TRA analysis and metabolite profiling were performed using accelerator mass spectrometry. Radiolabeled metabolites were identified using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Metabolite profiles were similar in plasma, urine, and feces samples across the four patients analyzed. All metabolites identified were de-boronated. In AUC_0-816 h time-proportional pooled plasma, ixazomib (54.2% of plasma TRA) and metabolites M1 (18.9%), M3 (10.6%), and M2 (7.91%), were the primary components identified. M1 was the major metabolite, contributing to 31.1% of the 76.2% of the total dose excreted in urine and feces over 0-35-day postdose. As none of the identified metabolites had a boronic acid moiety, they are unlikely to be pharmacologically active.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrolytic metabolism in conjunction with oxidative deboronation appears to be the principal process in the in vivo biotransformation pathways of ixazomib. The inference of formation-rate-limited clearance of ixazomib metabolites and the inferred lack of pharmacologic activity of identified circulating metabolites provides justification for use of parent drug concentrations/systemic exposure in clinical pharmacology analyses.

Next-generation proteasome inhibitors for cancer therapy

Over 2 decades ago, the proteasome was considered a risky or even untenable therapeutic target. Today, proteasome inhibitors are a mainstay in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and have sales in excess of 3 billion US dollars annually. More importantly, the availability of proteasome inhibitors has greatly improved the survival and quality of life for patients with MM. Despite the remarkable success of proteasome inhibitor therapies to date, the potential for improvement remains, and the development and optimal use of proteasome inhibitors as anticancer agents continues to be an active area of research. In this review, we briefly discuss the features and limitations of the 3 proteasome inhibitor drugs currently used in the clinic and provide an update on current efforts to develop next-generation proteasome inhibitors with the potential to overcome the limitations of existing proteasome inhibitor drugs.

The effect of itraconazole and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of osimertinib

AIMS

We investigated the effects of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) or inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetics of the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in two Phase I, open-label, two-part clinical studies. Part one of both studies is reported.

METHODS

In the itraconazole study (NCT02157883), patients received single-dose osimertinib 80 mg on Days 1 and 10 and itraconazole (200 mg twice daily) on Days 6-18 orally. In the rifampicin study (NCT02197247), patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 1-77 and rifampicin 600 mg once daily on Days 29-49.

RESULTS

In the itraconazole study (n = 36), the geometric least squares mean (GMLSM) ratios (osimertinib plus itraconazole/osimertinib alone) for Cmax and AUC were 80% (90% CI 73, 87) and 124% (90% CI 115, 135), respectively, below the predefined no-effect upper limit of 200%. In the rifampicin study (n = 40), the GMLSM ratios (osimertinib plus rifampicin/osimertinib alone) for Css,max and AUCτ were 27% (90% CI 24, 30) and 22% (90% CI 20, 24), respectively, below the predefined no-effect lower limit of 50%. The induction effect of rifampicin was apparent within 7 days of initiation; osimertinib Css,max and AUCτ values returned to pre-rifampicin levels within 3 weeks of rifampicin discontinuation. No new osimertinib safety findings were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib can be co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, but strong CYP3A inducers should be avoided if possible.

Development, Verification, and Prediction of Osimertinib Drug-Drug Interactions Using PBPK Modeling Approach to Inform Drug Label

Osimertinib is a potent, highly selective, irreversible inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and T790M resistance mutation. In vitro metabolism data suggested osimertinib is a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4/5, a weak inducer of CYP3A, and an inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). A combination of in vitro data, clinical pharmacokinetic data, and drug-drug interaction (DDI) data of osimertinib in oncology patients were used to develop the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and verify the DDI data of osimertinib. The model predicted the observed monotherapy concentration profile of osimertinib within 1.1-fold, and showed good predictability (within 1.7-fold) to the observed peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the curve (AUC) DDI ratio changes, when co-administered with rifampicin, itraconazole, and simvastatin, but not with rosuvastatin. Based on observed clinical data and PBPK simulations, the recommended dose of osimertinib when dosed with strong CYP3A inducers is 160 mg once daily. PBPK modeling suggested no dose adjustment with moderate and weak CYP3A inducers.

A phase I study to assess the mass balance, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of [14C]-ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

This two-part, phase I study evaluated the mass balance, excretion, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of ixazomib in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Part A of the study, patients received a single 4.1 mg oral solution dose of [¹⁴C]-ixazomib containing ~500 nCi total radioactivity (TRA), followed by non-radiolabeled ixazomib (4 mg capsule) on days 14 and 21 of the 35-day PK cycle. Patients were confined to the clinic for the first 168 h post dose and returned for 24 h overnight clinic visits on days 14, 21, 28, and 35. Blood, urine, and fecal samples were collected during Part A to assess the mass balance (by accelerator mass spectrometry), excretion, and PK of ixazomib. During Part B of the study, patients received non-radiolabeled ixazomib (4 mg capsules) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. After oral administration, ixazomib was rapidly absorbed with a median plasma T_max of 0.5 h and represented 70% of total drug-related material in plasma. The mean total recovery of administered TRA was 83.9%; 62.1% in urine and 21.8% in feces. Only 3.23% of the administered dose was recovered in urine as unchanged drug up to 168 h post dose, suggesting that most of the TRA in urine was attributable to metabolites. All patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event, which most commonly involved the gastrointestinal system. These findings suggest that ixazomib is extensively metabolized, with urine representing the predominant route of excretion of drug-related material.Trial ID: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01953783.