1
|
Saha P, Smith M, Hasan K. Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques-A Review of Literature. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2023; 8:93. [PMID: 37489306 PMCID: PMC10366715 DOI: 10.3390/jfmk8030093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Intra-articular injections are widely used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes of joint pathologies throughout the body. These injections can be performed blind by utilizing anatomical landmarks or with the use of imaging modalities to directly visualize the joint space during injections. This review of the literature aims to comprehensively identify differences in the accuracy of intra-articular injections via palpation vs. image guidance in the most commonly injected joints in the upper and lower extremities. To our knowledge, there are no such comprehensive reviews available. A narrative literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies focusing on the accuracy of blind or image-guided intra-articular injections for each joint. A total of 75 articles was included in this review, with blind and image-guided strategies being discussed for the most commonly injected joints of the upper and lower extremities. Varying ranges of accuracy with blind and image-guided modalities were found throughout the literature, though an improvement in accuracy was seen in nearly all joints when using image guidance. Differences are pronounced, particularly in deep joints such as the hip or in the small joints such as those in the hand or foot. Image guidance is a useful adjunct for most intra-articular injections, if available. Though there is an increase in accuracy in nearly all joints, minor differences in accuracy seen in large, easily accessed joints, such as the knee, may not warrant image guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasenjit Saha
- Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Khalid Hasan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel RP, McGill K, Motamedi D, Morgan T. Ultrasound-guided interventions of the upper extremity joints. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:897-909. [PMID: 35962837 PMCID: PMC10027633 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04148-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound guidance is valuable for performing precise joint interventions. Joint interventions may be requested for therapeutic and diagnostic pain injections, joint aspiration in the setting of suspected infection, or contrast injection for arthrography. In practice, interventions of the shoulder girdle, elbow, and hand/wrist joints may be performed without any imaging guidance. However, imaging guidance results in more accurate interventions and better patient outcomes than those performed by palpation alone. When compared to other modalities used for imaging guidance, ultrasound has many potential advantages. Radiologists should be prepared to perform ultrasound-guided upper extremity joint interventions utilizing recommended techniques to optimize clinical practice and patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: 1. Ultrasound-guided injections of the glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, elbow, and hand/wrist joints have higher accuracy than injections performed without imaging guidance. 2. Ultrasound-guided aspirations of upper extremity joints have advantages to fluoroscopic-guided aspirations because of the potential to identify effusions, soft tissue abscess, or bursitis. 3. Ultrasound-guided contrast injection prior to MR arthrography is as accurate as fluoroscopic-guided injection for upper extremity joints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rina P Patel
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Kevin McGill
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Daria Motamedi
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Tara Morgan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sağlam G, Çetinkaya Alişar D. Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided platelet-rich plasma injection for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis: A prospective, randomized study. Arch Rheumatol 2023; 38:67-74. [PMID: 37235119 PMCID: PMC10208619 DOI: 10.46497/archrheumatol.2023.9196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to compare the effectiveness of palpation-guided and ultrasound (US)-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2021 and August 2021, a total of 60 patients (34 males, 26 females; mean age: 40.5±10.9 years; range, 22 to 64 years) diagnosed with chronic LE were included. The patients were randomly allocated to either the palpation-guided (n=30) or the US-guided injection group (n=30) before they received PRP injection. All patients were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale, and grip strength at baseline and at one, three, and six months after injection. RESULTS Baseline sociodemographic and clinical variables were statistically similar between two groups (p>0.05). The VAS and DASH scores improved significantly after the injection at each control, as well as grip strength in both groups (p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding VAS and DASH scores, and grip strength at one, three, and six months post-injection (p>0.05). No significant complication related to the injection was observed in any of the groups. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that both palpation-guided and US-guided PRP injection protocols can improve clinical symptoms and functional parameters of patients with chronic LE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonca Sağlam
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Türkiye
| | - Dilek Çetinkaya Alişar
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fukui S, Rokutanda R, Kawaai S, Suda M, Iwata F, Okada M, Kishimoto M. Current evidence and practical knowledge for ultrasound-guided procedures in rheumatology: Joint aspiration, injection, and other applications. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101832. [PMID: 37248141 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound (US)-guided procedures have increasingly gained their role in the daily practice of rheumatology, owing to the growing evidence supporting their utility. The utilization of US guidance in procedures may enhance their accuracy, efficacy, and safety. This article presents a comprehensive review of the current evidence and practical knowledge pertaining to US-guided procedures in rheumatology, encompassing joint aspirations, injections, and other applications such as tendon sheath injections. We provide a detailed description of the US-guided procedure process and compare the in-plane and out-of-plane view methods, along with practical techniques based on existing evidence or our own expertise. For each joint, we summarize how to perform procedures with figures to facilitate a better understanding. Additionally, we introduce other applications of US-guided procedures for tendons, enthesis, bursae, and nerves as well as emerging therapies such as US-guided fascia hydrorelease. By utilizing these US techniques, rheumatologists can achieve the ability to manage a wider range of musculoskeletal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sho Fukui
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, MA, USA; Department of Emergency and General Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Ryo Rokutanda
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Kawaai
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masei Suda
- Department of Rheumatology, Suwa Central Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | - Futoshi Iwata
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Okada
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsumasa Kishimoto
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
'Ultrasound Examination' of the Musculoskeletal System: Bibliometric/Visualized Analyses on the Terminology (Change). Tomography 2023; 9:352-361. [PMID: 36828380 PMCID: PMC9958559 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9010028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging of the musculoskeletal system is paramount for physicians of different specialties. In recent years, its use has become the extension of physical examinations like using a "magnifying glass". Likewise, the eventual concept has naturally and spontaneously evolved to a "fusion" of classical physical examination and static/dynamic ultrasound imaging of the musculoskeletal system. In this regard, we deem it important to explore the current use/awareness regarding 'ultrasound examination', and to better provide insight into understanding future research spots in this field. Accordingly, this study aimed to search the global/research status of 'ultrasound examination' of the musculoskeletal system based on bibliometric and visualized analysis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Naredo E, Rodriguez-Garcia SC, Terslev L, Martinoli C, Klauser A, Hartung W, Hammer HB, Cantisani V, Zaottini F, Vlad V, Uson J, Todorov P, Tesch C, Sudoł-Szopińska I, Simoni P, Serban O, Sconfienza LM, Sala-Blanch X, Plagou A, Picasso R, Özçakar L, Najm A, Möller I, Micu M, Mendoza-Cembranos D, Mandl P, Malattia C, Lenghel M, Kessler J, Iohom G, de la Fuente J, DʼAgostino MA, Collado P, Bueno A, Bong D, Alfageme F, Bilous D, Gutiu R, Marian A, Pelea M, Fodor D. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound - Part II: Joint Pathologies, Pediatric Applications, and Guided Procedures. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2022; 43:252-273. [PMID: 34734404 DOI: 10.1055/a-1640-9183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The second part of the Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS), produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, following the same methodology as for Part 1, provides information and recommendations on the use of this imaging modality for joint pathology, pediatric applications, and musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided procedures. Clinical application, practical points, limitations, and artifacts are described and discussed for every joint or procedure. The document is intended to guide clinical users in their daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esperanza Naredo
- Department of Rheumatology, Bone and Joint Research Unit. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, IIS Fundación Jiménez Díaz, and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Lene Terslev
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carlo Martinoli
- Department of Health Science - DISSAL, University of Genova, Italy
- UO Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Klauser
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Section Head Rheumatology and Sports Imaging, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Hartung
- Clinic for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Asklepios Clinic, Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - Hilde B Hammer
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Zaottini
- Department of Health Science - DISSAL, University of Genova, Italy
- UO Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Violeta Vlad
- Sf. Maria Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jacqueline Uson
- Department of Rheumatology Hospital Universitario Móstoles, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Plamen Todorov
- Department of Internal Disease Propaedeutic and Clinical Rheumatology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | | | - Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska
- Department of Radiology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paolo Simoni
- Paediatric Imaging Department, "Reine Fabiola" Children's University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Oana Serban
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Xavier Sala-Blanch
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Clinic, Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Athena Plagou
- Ultrasound Unit, Private Radiological Institution, Athens, Greece
| | - Riccardo Picasso
- Department of Health Science - DISSAL, University of Genova, Italy
- UO Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Levent Özçakar
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aurelie Najm
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ingrid Möller
- Instituto Poal de Reumatologia Barcelona, EULAR Working Group Anatomy for the Image, University of Barcelona, International University of Catalunya, Spain
| | - Mihaela Micu
- Rheumatology Division, 2nd Rehabilitation Department, Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Peter Mandl
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Clara Malattia
- UOC Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetic and Maternal Infantile Sciences (DINOGMI) University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Manuela Lenghel
- Radiology Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Jens Kessler
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriella Iohom
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cork University Hospital and University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Maria Antonietta DʼAgostino
- Istituto di Reumatologia Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, UOC Reumatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paz Collado
- Rheumatology Department, Transitional Care Clinic, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Bueno
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Bong
- Instituto Poal de Reumatologia Barcelona, EULAR Working Group Anatomy for the Image, University of Barcelona, International University of Catalunya, Spain
| | - Fernando Alfageme
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Bilous
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Roxana Gutiu
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Anamaria Marian
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Michael Pelea
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Daniela Fodor
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diclofenac-hyaluronate conjugate (diclofenac etalhyaluronate) intra-articular injection for hip, ankle, shoulder, and elbow osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:371. [PMID: 35443676 PMCID: PMC9022275 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05328-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of diclofenac etalhyaluronate (DF-HA) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, ankle, shoulder, or elbow. Methods In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in Japan, Japanese patients aged ≥20 years diagnosed with OA of the hip, ankle, shoulder, or elbow were randomly assigned 1:1 to DF-HA 30 mg or placebo (citric acid-sodium citrate buffered solution). Subjects received three injections of the study drug in each joint cavity every 4 weeks and were assessed for 12 weeks after the first injection. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in a diary-based 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain over 12 weeks, analyzed for each joint. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded, and morphological changes in each joint were evaluated radiographically. Results The study drug (DF-HA vs placebo) was injected into 90, 60, 90, or 50 subjects with OA of the hip, ankle, shoulder, or elbow (46 vs 44, 30 vs 30, 45 vs 45, and 25 vs 25, respectively). The group differences in the mean change from baseline in the pain NRS over 12 weeks were − 0.81 (95% confidence interval: − 1.48 to − 0.13), − 0.07 (− 1.03 to 0.89), 0.15 (− 0.48 to 0.78), and 0.61 (− 0.41 to 1.62) for the hip, ankle, shoulder, and elbow joints, respectively, with statistically significant differences observed only in the hip joint. The change from baseline in the hip joint was greater with DF-HA than placebo at all time points from Weeks 1–12. No clinically significant adverse events or radiographic changes were observed. Conclusions Intra-articularly administered DF-HA for hip OA produced a rapid response and was safe, with analgesia maintained for 12 weeks when administered every 4 weeks. Trial registration JapicCTI-173,678 (First registered date: 21 August 2017). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05328-3.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bosch P, Carubbi F, Scirè CA, Baraliakos X, Falzon L, Dejaco C, Machado PM. Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001864. [PMID: 34810228 PMCID: PMC8609947 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarise current data on the value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMDs) informing an European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology taskforce. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve prospective and retrospective studies published in English and comparing different (imaging) techniques, different settings and procedural protocols to guide interventions in patients with RMDs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos databases were searched through October 2021. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool for randomised trials V.2 (ROB2), the RoB tool for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions and the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. RESULTS Sixty-six studies were included (most with moderate/high RoB); 49 were randomised controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies and 14 retrospective studies. Fifty-one studies compared either one imaging technique with another imaging technique, or with palpation-guided interventions. Ultrasound (US) was most frequently studied (49/51), followed by fluoroscopy (10/51). Higher accuracy was found for US or fluoroscopy compared with palpation-guided interventions. Studies comparing different imaging techniques (12/51) did not endorse one specific method. Different settings/equipment for imaging-guided procedures (eg, automatic vs manual syringes) were investigated in three studies, reporting heterogeneous results. Fifteen studies compared different imaging-guided procedures (eg, intra-articular vs periarticular injections). CONCLUSION Higher accuracy of needle positioning at joints and periarticular structures was seen in most studies when using imaging (especially US) guidance as compared with palpation-guided interventions with the limitation of heterogeneity of data and considerable RoB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Bosch
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Francesco Carubbi
- Internal Medicine and Nephrology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Medicine, ASL 1 Avezzano-Sulmona-L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Christian Dejaco
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria .,Rheumatology Service, Hospital of Bruneck, Bruneck, Italy
| | - Pedro M Machado
- Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zagarella A, Signorelli G, Muscogiuri G, Colombo R, Folco G, Arrigoni P, Radici M, Randelli PS, Gallazzi MB. Overuse-related instability of the elbow: the role of CT-arthrography. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:140. [PMID: 34633569 PMCID: PMC8505589 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01065-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The elbow is a complex joint whose biomechanical function is granted by the interplay and synergy of various anatomical structures. Articular stability is achieved by both static and dynamic constraints, which consist of osseous as well as soft-tissue components. Injuries determining instability frequently involve several of these structures. Therefore, accurate knowledge of regional anatomy and imaging findings is fundamental for a precise diagnosis and an appropriate clinical management of elbow instability. This review focuses particularly on the varied appearance of overuse-related elbow injuries at CT-arthrography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Zagarella
- U.O.C. Radiodiagnostica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giulia Signorelli
- Scuola Di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Muscogiuri
- Scuola Di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Colombo
- Scuola Di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Folco
- Scuola Di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Arrigoni
- I Clinica Ortopedica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Radici
- Scuola Di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Simone Randelli
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.,U.O.C. 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Research Center for Adult and Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases (RECAP-RD), Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Battista Gallazzi
- U.O.C. Radiodiagnostica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tortora S, Messina C, Albano D, Serpi F, Corazza A, Carrafiello G, Sconfienza LM, Gitto S. Ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around the elbow, hand and wrist excluding carpal tunnel procedures. J Ultrason 2021; 21:e169-e176. [PMID: 34258043 PMCID: PMC8264808 DOI: 10.15557/jou.2021.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound is a fast, reliable and radiation-free method for the assessment of a wide range of pathological conditions, as well as for the guidance of percutaneous interventional procedures around the elbow, hand and wrist. Intraarticular and periarticular interventional procedures can be easily performed under continuous ultrasound monitoring to ensure correct needle positioning and medication delivery to a specific target. The most common ultrasound-guided procedures performed around the elbow, wrist, and hand are described in this review, excluding carpal tunnel procedures. Specifically, elbow steroid injections are performed in patients with inflammatory disorders, while hyaluronic acid can be administered in case of osteoarthritis. Septic olecranon bursitis requires percutaneous drainage for diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Dry needling and injection of regenerative medications, such as blood derivatives, are among the treatment options for lateral epicondylosis. Steroid injections are performed to give symptom relief in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Hand and wrist steroid injections are performed in case of osteoarthritis, subsequently followed by hyaluronic acid injections, and in inflammatory disorders. Wrist ganglia can be safely aspirated and injected with steroids under ultrasound guidance. De Quervain’s tenosynovitis and trigger finger are chronic tenosynovitides of the wrist and digits, respectively, which can be treated with steroid injections, subsequently followed by hyaluronic acid injections. In conclusion, proper knowledge of the musculoskeletal disorders around the elbow, hand and wrist, as well as US-guided treatment options and operator training, are prerequisites to achieve good outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Tortora
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.,Unità di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Italy
| | - Domenico Albano
- Unità di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Italy.,Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesca Serpi
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| | - Angelo Corazza
- Unità di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.,Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Italy
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.,Unità di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D, Aparisi Gómez MP, Bazzocchi A, Beggs I, Bignotti B, Chianca V, Corazza A, Dalili D, De Dea M, Del Cura JL, Di Pietto F, Drakonaki E, Facal de Castro F, Filippiadis D, Gielen J, Gitto S, Gupta H, Klauser AS, Lalam R, Martin S, Martinoli C, Mauri G, McCarthy C, McNally E, Melaki K, Messina C, Mirón Mombiela R, Neubauer B, Obradov M, Olchowy C, Orlandi D, Plagou A, Prada Gonzalez R, Rutkauskas S, Snoj Z, Tagliafico AS, Talaska A, Vasilevska-Nikodinovska V, Vucetic J, Wilson D, Zaottini F, Zappia M, Allen G. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-Part II, elbow and wrist. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:2220-2230. [PMID: 31844963 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06545-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although image-guided interventional procedures of the elbow and wrist are routinely performed, there is poor evidence in the literature concerning such treatments. Our aim was to perform a Delphi-based consensus on published evidence on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist and provide clinical indications on this topic. METHODS A board of 45 experts in image-guided interventional musculoskeletal procedures from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology were involved in this Delphi-based consensus study. All panelists reviewed and scored published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist updated to September 2018 according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence. Consensus on statements drafted by the panelists about clinical indications was considered as "strong" when more than 95% of panelists agreed and as "broad" if more than 80% agreed. RESULTS Eighteen statements were drafted, 12 about tendon procedures and 6 about intra-articular procedures. Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence (ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement). Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while one received broad consensus (6%). CONCLUSIONS There is still poor evidence in published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist. A strong consensus has been achieved in 17/18 (94%) statements provided by the panel on clinical indications. Large prospective randomized trials are needed to better define the role of these procedures in clinical practice. KEY POINTS • The panel provided 18 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist. • Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence: ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement. • Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while broad consensus was obtained by 1 statement (6%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. .,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100, Milan, Italy.
| | - Miraude Adriaensen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen, Brunssum, Kerkrade, The Netherlands
| | - Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.,Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Hospital Vithas Nueve de Octubre, 46015, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G. C. Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ian Beggs
- Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bianca Bignotti
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Vito Chianca
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Corazza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Danoob Dalili
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - Miriam De Dea
- UOC Radiologia, Ospedale di Feltre, AULSS1 Dolomiti, Veneto, Italy
| | - Jose Luis Del Cura
- Department of Radiology, Donostia University Hospital, Begiristain Doktorea Pasealekua, 109, 20014, Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain.,University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
| | - Francesco Di Pietto
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | - Eleni Drakonaki
- Private Institution of Ultrasonography and MSK Radiology, Heraklion, Greece.,Department of Anatomy, Medical School of the European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Fernando Facal de Castro
- IBERORAD 1895 S.L., 08021, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Radiology, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jan Gielen
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Andrea S Klauser
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Radhesh Lalam
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Gobowen, Oswestry, UK
| | - Silvia Martin
- Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,Medicine, Universidad de las Islas Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Carlo Martinoli
- DISSAL Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, 16132, Genova, Italy.,Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Catherine McCarthy
- The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Musculoskeletal Radiology, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Kalliopi Melaki
- Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100, Milan, Italy
| | - Rebeca Mirón Mombiela
- Department of Physiology, Universidad de Valencia/INCLIVA, Avenida Blasco Ibañez 15, 46010, Valencia, Spain.,Radiologisk Afdeling, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, opgang 51, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Benedikt Neubauer
- Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ordensklinkum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Cyprian Olchowy
- Department of Oral Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Davide Orlandi
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Athena Plagou
- Department of Radiology, Private Institution of Ultrasonography, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Saulius Rutkauskas
- Institute of Sport Science and Innovation, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ziga Snoj
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška ul. 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
- DISSAL Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, 16132, Genova, Italy.,Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska
- Medical Faculty, University "Ss.Cyril and Methodius", University Surgical Clinic "St.Naum Ohridski", Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Jelena Vucetic
- Department of Radiology, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Radiologisk Afdeling, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, opgang 51, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - David Wilson
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Federico Zaottini
- DISSAL Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Zappia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Varelli Institute, Naples, Italy
| | - Georgina Allen
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sconfienza LM, Chianca V, Messina C, Albano D, Pozzi G, Bazzocchi A. Upper Limb Interventions. Radiol Clin North Am 2019; 57:1073-1082. [PMID: 31351537 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound has been reported to be a quick, cheap, and effective imaging modality to guide the interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system. The use of ultrasound results in increased accuracy of needle placement associated with a reduction of complications. In the upper limb, ultrasound-guided procedures are applied to joints and soft tissues around the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand. This article reviews the clinical and technical aspects of the most common procedures performed in this anatomic area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milano 20161, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Pascal 36, Milano 20122, Italy.
| | - Vito Chianca
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milano 20161, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milano 20161, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Pascal 36, Milano 20122, Italy
| | - Domenico Albano
- Università degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Via del Vespro, 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Grazia Pozzi
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milano 20161, Italy
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via G. C. Pupilli 1, Bologna 40136, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kraeutler MJ, Garabekyan T, Fioravanti MJ, Young DA, Mei-Dan O. Efficacy of a non-image-guided diagnostic hip injection in patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of intra-articular hip pathology. J Hip Preserv Surg 2018; 5:220-225. [PMID: 30393548 PMCID: PMC6206695 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hny013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the likelihood of pain relief, as a measure of accurate diagnosis of intra-articular hip pathology and correct needle placement, with a non-image-guided intra-articular hip injection performed bedside in the clinic. A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was performed in a consecutive cohort of patients diagnosed with symptomatic intra-articular hip pathology who underwent a non-image-guided intra-articular injection in the clinic. All patients had clinical and radiographic evidence of hip impingement, hip instability, chondrolabral pathology, or other causes of intra-articular hip pain. A previously described technique for a non-image-guided hip injection was performed using 7-10 ml of 1% lidocaine for diagnostic evaluation with some patients receiving 2 ml of Kenalog®-40 if clinically indicated. Ten minutes following each injection, the patient was asked to report the percent improvement in pain (from 0 to 100%) while physical examination and provocative tests were repeated. The final study cohort comprised 142 patients (161 injections). In three cases, patients were either unable to assess or quantify any change in pain level 10 min following the injection. In the remaining 158 hip injections, pain relief was noted in 156 cases (156/158, 98.7%), with at least 70% improvement in pain level noted in 152 cases (152/158, 96.2%). Average pain relief among all 158 injections was 89 ± 16%. A non-image-guided diagnostic intra-articular hip injection yields reliable short-term pain relief, simultaneously endorsing accurate diagnosis of hip pathology and intra-articular needle placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Kraeutler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall-Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, South Orange, NJ, USA
| | | | - Matthew J Fioravanti
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Omer Mei-Dan
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Musculoskeletal interventional procedures: With or without imaging guidance? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2016; 30:736-750. [PMID: 27931965 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Revised: 09/26/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Aspiration and injection of joints and soft tissues is an indispensable skill used in everyday practice by the clinical rheumatologist. Most rheumatologists recognise that performing these procedures using anatomical landmarks is not always successful, particularly in the case of small or infrequently injected joints, bursae or tendon sheaths. Musculoskeletal ultrasound confirms the local pathological-anatomical diagnosis and is the most applicable and feasible imaging method that can be applied in clinical practice in guiding musculoskeletal interventional procedures. From 1993, there has been substantial examination of the accuracy of landmark- and imaging-guided procedures. We have searched the literature and ascertained whether imaging techniques improve the accuracy of musculoskeletal procedures and whether the accuracy of needle placement can be translated into improved clinical outcome (efficacy).
Collapse
|
15
|
Ultrasound Guidance for Technically Challenging Intrathecal Baclofen Pump Refill. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 95:692-7. [DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000000495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Abstract
High-resolution ultrasonography can help clinicians visualize key anatomic structures of the elbow and guide periarticular and intra-articular injections. Historically, most procedures done around the elbow have been done using landmark guidance, and few studies have reported the accuracy of ultrasonography-guided injections in the elbow region. This article reviews common musculoskeletal disorders about the elbow that can be evaluated with ultrasonography, reviews the literature on ultrasonography-guided injections of the elbow region, and describes the senior author's preferred approach for the most commonly performed elbow region injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter I Sussman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Emory University, 1441 Clifton Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christopher J Williams
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Emory University, 1441 Clifton Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Ken Mautner
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Emory University, 1441 Clifton Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) is a cost-effective, noninvasive, and accessible imaging modality that clinicians use at the point of care to assess disease activity and therapeutic efficacy in different rheumatic conditions. It can play a relevant role in invasive procedures performed by the rheumatologist, potentially ensuring a higher degree of accuracy. However, US-guided injections are still underused, and the conventional blind injection the most commonly adopted approach. In this article, we analyze the current evidence supporting the use of US-guided procedures, emphasizing comparative studies between conventional and US-guided procedures and their benefits in the daily rheumatological practice.
Collapse
|
18
|
Wilson DJ, Scully WF, Rawlings JM. Evolving Role of Ultrasound in Therapeutic Injections of the Upper Extremity. Orthopedics 2015; 38:e1017-24. [PMID: 26558666 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20151020-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound machines are creating more refined pictures and becoming more user-friendly and readily accessible. As a result, ultrasound is being increasingly used for therapeutic purposes. One example involves the use of ultrasound guidance in musculoskeletal interventional procedures, such as joint injections, tendon sheath injections, and peripheral nerve blocks. Technical considerations and therapeutic results have been described for multiple locations about the upper extremities, with varying levels of success. The implementation of ultrasound-guided injections in the orthopedist's clinic has therapeutic, financial, and provider role implications. Given these potential benefits, orthopedic providers, both in practice and residency, would benefit from increased exposure and education in ultrasound use. Ultrasound provides the benefit of real-time, dynamic imaging without the radiation exposure of fluoroscopy, and ultrasound-guided injections can be performed in the office, as opposed to the operating room, which is frequently required when using fluoroscopy. A basic knowledge of the principles and terms used in ultrasound is required. With these simple principles, a practitioner can review techniques for specific areas of the musculoskeletal system and begin using ultrasound to guide injections. Many locations for diagnostic and/or therapeutic injections in the upper extremities have improved accuracy and benefit with the use of ultrasound vs blind techniques, although a few have not been shown to have a significant difference in the literature. The educational and professional implications can be significant, but these potential benefits need to be carefully weighed against costs by each orthopedic practice.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ultrasound guidance to perform intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based contrast material for magnetic resonance arthrography as an alternative to fluoroscopy: the time is now. Eur Radiol 2015; 26:1221-5. [PMID: 26253260 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3945-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Revised: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been definitively established as the reference standard in the evaluation of joints in the body. Similarly, magnetic resonance arthrography has emerged as a technique that has been proven to increase significantly the diagnostic performance if compared with conventional MR imaging, especially when dealing with fibrocartilage and articular cartilage abnormalities. Diluted gadolinium can be injected in the joint space using different approaches: under palpation using anatomic landmarks or using an imaging guidance, such as fluoroscopy, computed tomography, or ultrasound. Fluoroscopy has been traditionally used, but the involvement of ionizing radiation should represent a remarkable limitation of this modality. Conversely, ultrasound has emerged as a feasible, cheap, quick, and radiation-free modality that can be used to inject joints, with comparable accuracy of fluoroscopy. In the present paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using fluoroscopy or ultrasound in injecting gadolinium-based contrast agents in joints to perform magnetic resonance arthrography, also in view of the new EuroSAFE Imaging initiative promoted by the European Society of Radiology and the recent updates to the European Atomic Energy Community 2013/59 directive on the medical use of ionizing radiation. KEY POINTS • Intra-articular contrast agent injection can be performed using different imaging modalities • Fluoroscopy is widely used, but uses ionizing radiation • Ultrasound is an accurate, quick, and radiation-free modality for joint injection • X-rays should be avoided when other radiation-free modalities can be used.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this video article is to demonstrate the use of ultrasound for upper extremity musculoskeletal injections, covering general guidelines, preprocedure planning, needle selection, and basic technique. Several different upper-extremity injections are shown, including joint injections and aspirations, tendon sheath and bursal injections, and percutaneous treatment of calcific tendinitis. CONCLUSION Musculoskeletal ultrasound is well suited for imaging-guided injections of the upper extremities. It is readily available, allows for high-resolution real-time imaging of the soft tissues and joints, and is adaptable for patient comfort and positioning. After viewing this video article, the observer should have an understanding of the applications for ultrasound in upper-extremity musculoskeletal interventions and should be able to apply that knowledge to advance their clinical practice.
Collapse
|