Avian scale development. IV. Ultrastructure of the anterior shank skin of the scaleless mutant

Development-Associated Genes of the Epidermal Differentiation Complex (EDC)

The epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) is a cluster of genes that encode protein components of the outermost layers of the epidermis in mammals, reptiles and birds. The development of the stratified epidermis from a single-layered ectoderm involves an embryo-specific superficial cell layer, the periderm. An additional layer, the subperiderm, develops in crocodilians and over scutate scales of birds. Here, we review the expression of EDC genes during embryonic development. Several EDC genes are expressed predominantly or exclusively in embryo-specific cell layers, whereas others are confined to the epidermal layers that are maintained in postnatal skin. The S100 fused-type proteins scaffoldin and trichohyalin are expressed in the avian and mammalian periderm, respectively. Scaffoldin forms the so-called periderm granules, which are histological markers of the periderm in birds. Epidermal differentiation cysteine-rich protein (EDCRP) and epidermal differentiation protein containing DPCC motifs (EDDM) are expressed in the avian subperiderm where they are supposed to undergo cross-linking via disulfide bonds. Furthermore, a histidine-rich epidermal differentiation protein and feather-type corneous beta-proteins, also known as beta-keratins, are expressed in the subperiderm. The accumulating evidence for roles of EDC genes in the development of the epidermis has implications on the evolutionary diversification of the skin in amniotes.

Topographical mapping of α- and β-keratins on developing chicken skin integuments: Functional interaction and evolutionary perspectives

Avian integumentary organs include feathers, scales, claws, and beaks. They cover the body surface and play various functions to help adapt birds to diverse environments. These keratinized structures are mainly composed of corneous materials made of α-keratins, which exist in all vertebrates, and β-keratins, which only exist in birds and reptiles. Here, members of the keratin gene families were used to study how gene family evolution contributes to novelty and adaptation, focusing on tissue morphogenesis. Using chicken as a model, we applied RNA-seq and in situ hybridization to map α- and β-keratin genes in various skin appendages at embryonic developmental stages. The data demonstrate that temporal and spatial α- and β-keratin expression is involved in establishing the diversity of skin appendage phenotypes. Embryonic feathers express a higher proportion of β-keratin genes than other skin regions. In feather filament morphogenesis, β-keratins show intricate complexity in diverse substructures of feather branches. To explore functional interactions, we used a retrovirus transgenic system to ectopically express mutant α- or antisense β-keratin forms. α- and β-keratins show mutual dependence and mutations in either keratin type results in disrupted keratin networks and failure to form proper feather branches. Our data suggest that combinations of α- and β-keratin genes contribute to the morphological and structural diversity of different avian skin appendages, with feather-β-keratins conferring more possible composites in building intrafeather architecture complexity, setting up a platform of morphological evolution of functional forms in feathers.

Evolutionary origin of the feather epidermis

The formation of scales and feathers in reptiles and birds has fascinated biologists for decades. How might the developmental processes involved in the evolution of the amniote ectoderm be interpreted to shed light on the evolution of integumental appendages? An Evo-Devo approach to this question is proving essential to understand the observation that there is homology between the transient embryonic layers covering the scale epidermis of alligators and birds and the epidermal cell populations of embryonic feather filaments. Whereas the embryonic layers of scutate scales are sloughed off at hatching, that their homologues persist in feathers demonstrates that the predecessors of birds took advantage of the ability of their ectoderm to generate embryonic layers by recruiting them to make the epidermis of the embryonic feather filament. Furthermore, observations on mutant chickens with altered scale and feather development (Abbott and Asmundson [1957] J. Hered. 18:63-70; Abbott [1965] Poult. Sci. 44:1347; Abbott [1967] Methods in developmental biology. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell) suggest that the ectodermal placodes of feathers, which direct the formation of unique dermal condensations and subsequently appendage outgrowth, provided the mechanism by which the developmental processes generating the embryonic layers diverged during evolution to support the morphogenesis of the epidermis of the primitive feather filament with its barb ridges.

Avian skin development and the evolutionary origin of feathers

The discovery of several dinosaurs with filamentous integumentary appendages of different morphologies has stimulated models for the evolutionary origin of feathers. In order to understand these models, knowledge of the development of the avian integument must be put into an evolutionary context. Thus, we present a review of avian scale and feather development, which summarizes the morphogenetic events involved, as well as the expression of the beta (beta) keratin multigene family that characterizes the epidermal appendages of reptiles and birds. First we review information on the evolution of the ectodermal epidermis and its beta (beta) keratins. Then we examine the morphogenesis of scutate scales and feathers including studies in which the extraembryonic ectoderm of the chorion is used to examine dermal induction. We also present studies on the scaleless (sc) mutant, and, because of the recent discovery of "four-winged" dinosaurs, we review earlier studies of a chicken strain, Silkie, that expresses ptilopody (pti), "feathered feet." We conclude that the ability of the ectodermal epidermis to generate discrete cell populations capable of forming functional structural elements consisting of specific members of the beta keratin multigene family was a plesiomorphic feature of the archosaurian ancestor of crocodilians and birds. Evidence suggests that the discrete epidermal lineages that make up the embryonic feather filament of extant birds are homologous with similar embryonic lineages of the developing scutate scales of birds and the scales of alligators. We believe that the early expression of conserved signaling modules in the embryonic skin of the avian ancestor led to the early morphogenesis of the embryonic feather filament, with its periderm, sheath, and barb ridge lineages forming the first protofeather. Invagination of the epidermis of the protofeather led to formation of the follicle providing for feather renewal and diversification. The observations that scale formation in birds involves an inhibition of feather formation coupled with observations on the feathered feet of the scaleless (High-line) and Silkie strains support the view that the ancestor of modern birds may have had feathered hind limbs similar to those recently discovered in nonavian dromaeosaurids. And finally, our recent observation on the bristles of the wild turkey beard raises the possibility that similar integumentary appendages may have adorned nonavian dinosaurs, and thus all filamentous integumentary appendages may not be homologous to modern feathers.

Origin of archosaurian integumentary appendages: the bristles of the wild turkey beard express feather-type beta keratins

The discovery that structurally unique "filamentous integumentary appendages" are associated with several different non-avian dinosaurs continues to stimulate the development of models to explain the evolutionary origin of feathers. Taking the phylogenetic relationships of the non-avian dinosaurs into consideration, some models propose that the "filamentous integumentary appendages" represent intermediate stages in the sequential evolution of feathers. Here we present observations on a unique integumentary structure, the bristle of the wild turkey beard, and suggest that this non-feather appendage provides another explanation for some of the "filamentous integumentary appendages." Unlike feathers, beard bristles grow continuously from finger-like outgrows of the integument lacking follicles. We find that these beard bristles, which show simple branching, are hollow, distally, and express the feather-type beta keratins. The significance of these observations to explanations for the evolution of archosaurian integumentary appendages is discussed.

Origin of feathers: Feather beta (beta) keratins are expressed in discrete epidermal cell populations of embryonic scutate scales

The feathers of birds develop from embryonic epidermal lineages that differentiate during outgrowth of the feather germ. Independent cell populations also form an embryonic epidermis on scutate scales, which consists of peridermal layers, a subperiderm, and an alpha stratum. Using an antiserum (anti-FbetaK) developed to react specifically with the beta (beta) keratins of feathers, we find that the feather-type beta keratins are expressed in the subperiderm cells of embryonic scutate scales, as well as the barb ridge lineages of the feather. However, unlike the subperiderm of scales, which is lost at hatching, the cells of barb ridges, in conjunction with adjacent cell populations, give rise to the structural elements of the feather. The observation that an embryonic epidermis, consisting of peridermal and subperidermal layers, also characterizes alligator scales (Thompson, 2001. J Anat 198:265-282) suggests that the epidermal populations of the scales and feathers of avian embryos are homologous with those forming the embryonic epidermis of alligators. While the embryonic epidermal populations of archosaurian scales are discarded at hatching, those of the feather germ differentiate into the periderm, sheath, barb ridges, axial plates, barbules, and marginal plates of the embryonic feather filament. We propose that the development of the embryonic feather filament provides a model for the evolution of the first protofeather. Furthermore, we hypothesize that invagination of the epidermal lineages of the feather filament, namely the barb ridges, initiated the formation of the follicle, which then allowed continuous renewal of the feather epidermal lineages, and the evolution of diverse feather forms.

Histidine-rich protein B of embryonic feathers is present in the transient embryonic layers of scutate scales

Based on its amino acid composition and N-terminal sequence, a polypeptide (HRP-B) has been identified as a member of the avian histidine-rich protein (HRP) family. An antiserum against HRP-B has been used to localize this polypeptide in developing feathers and scales of chick embryos. HRP-B was first detectable in the barb ridge cells of feathers at 13 days of incubation and progressively appeared in the distal/proximal and peripheral/central gradients observed previously for the feather-type beta keratins in developing feathers. The HRP-B polypeptide was detected only in the embryonic layers of scutate scales. It first appeared at 16 days of incubation and was not found in the differentiated beta strata of these scales. At no time during the development of reticulate scales or apteric skin regions did the epidermal cells or cells of the embryonic layers express HRP-B. The transient expression of HRP-B by the embryonic layers of the scutate scale epidermis is discussed in light of the feather-forming potential of the presumptive epidermis of the scutate scale-forming region.

Avian scale development. XVII: The epidermis of the scaleless (sc/sc) anterior metatarsal skin is determined, but the dermis lacks permissive cues for the patterned expression of the determined state

Embryos homozygous for the gene scaleless (sc/sc) completely lack scutate scales and the beta strata which characterize terminal differentiation of the scale ridges located on the anterior metatarsal region of the foot. Although the sc/sc epidermis cannot undergo scale morphogenesis, it can respond to the inductive dermal ridges of normal scutate scales by generating beta strata. Recently, we discovered that the anterior metatarsal epidermis of normal embryos becomes committed to the formation of beta strata prior to morphogenesis of definitive scale ridges. Here, we examined the possibility that the sc/sc anterior metatarsal epidermis also becomes determined, i.e., committed to scutate scale-specific terminal differentiation. Experimental tissue recombinants were used to assess the ability of the sc/sc epidermis to generate beta strata. The results show that the germinative cells of the 15-day sc/sc epidermis are committed to generating beta strata, even though they have not undergone scutate scale morphogenesis. Thus, the mechanisms involved in establishing epidermal determination must differ form those regulating scale morphogenesis. In addition, we examined the formation of patterned, permissive cues in the anterior metatarsal and footpad dermises of sc/sc embryos. Analysis of recombinants showed that both the 15- and 20-day dermises from the sc/sc anterior metatarsal region fail to provide cues for beta stratum formation, when associated with the determined 15-day scutate scale epidermis. Likewise, the 15-day sc/sc footpad dermis cannot support beta stratum formation. However, 20-day sc/sc footpad dermis is able to support the generation of a few abnormally patterned beta strata, demonstrating that sc/sc dermis which has experienced even limited morphogenesis is able to provide permissive cues for the terminal differentiation of the scutate scale epidermis.

Avian scale development. XIII. Epidermal germinative cells are committed to appendage-specific differentiation and respond to patterned cues in the dermis

The ability of the germinative cell population of scutate scale epidermis to continue to generate cells that undergo their appendage-specific differentiation (beta stratum formation), when associated with foreign dermis, was examined. Tissue recombination experiments were carried out which placed anterior metatarsal epidermis (scutate scale forming region) from normal 15-day chick embryos with either the anterior metatarsal dermis from 15-day scaleless (sc/sc) embryos or the dermis from the metatarsal footpad (reticulate scale forming region) of 15-day normal embryos. Neither of these dermal tissues are able to induce beta stratum formation in the simple ectodermal epithelium of the chorion, however, the footpad dermis develops an appendage-specific pattern during morphogenesis of the reticulate scales, while the sc/sc dermis does not. Morphological and immunohistological criteria were used to assess appendage-specific epidermal differentiation in these recombinants. The results show that the germinative cell population of the 15-day scutate scale epidermis is committed to generating suprabasal cells that follow their appendage-specific pathways of histogenesis and terminal differentiation. Of significance is the observation that the expression of this determined state occurred only when the epidermis differentiated in association with the footpad dermis, not when it was associated with the sc/sc dermis. The consistent positioning of the newly generated beta strata to the apical regions of individual reticulate-like appendages demonstrates that the dermal cues necessary for terminal epidermal differentiation are present in a reticulate scale pattern. The observation that beta stratum formation is completely missing in the determined scutate scale epidermis when associated with the sc/sc dermis adds to our understanding of the sc/sc defect. The present data support the conclusion of earlier studies that the anterior metatarsal dermis from 15-day sc/sc embryos lacks the ability to induce beta stratum formation in a foreign epithelium. In addition, these observations evoke the hypothesis that the sc/sc dermis either lacks the cues (generated during scutate and reticulate scale morphogenesis) necessary for terminal differentiation of the determined scutate scale epidermis or inhibits the generation of a beta stratum.

Immunocytochemical localization and biochemical analysis of alpha and beta keratins in the avian lingual epithelium

The alpha and beta keratins are found as 10-nm and 3-nm cytoplasmic filaments, respectively. While the alpha keratins are produced in essentially all vertebrate epithelia (Franke et al.: Exp. Cell Res., 116:429-445, 1978; Sun et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76:2813-2817, 1979), the beta keratins have been demonstrated only in specific epithelial tissues of birds and reptiles (Sawyer et al.: In: Biology of the Integument: Vertebrates. J. Bereiter-Hahn, A.G. Matoltsy, and K.S. Richards, eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 2, pp. 194-238, 1986; Landmann: In: Biology of the Integument: Vertebrates. J. Bereiter-Hahn, A.G. Matoltsy, and K.S. Richards, eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 2, pp. 150-187, 1986). Recently, Homberger and Brush (Zoomorphology, 106:103-114, 1986) have demonstrated that within the lingual epithelium of parrots, beta keratins are expressed exclusively in the anterior ventral region. While it is well established that epidermal-dermal interactions are important for the regional expression of the beta keratin genes in the avian scutate scales and feathers, little is known about the expression of beta keratins in other epithelial structures such as the tongue. We have used biochemical and immunocytochemical techniques to analyze the alpha and beta keratins of the lingual epithelium of the chick as an initial step in the characterization of this model system for developmental studies. We have found that alpha keratins are present throughout the lingual epithelium. The anterior ventral epithelium contains alpha keratin polypeptides characteristic of skin-type differentiation, while the epithelium of the dorsal and posterior ventral regions contains alpha keratin polypeptides characteristic of esophageal-type differentiation (O'Guin et al.: In: Current Topics in Developmental Biology: The Molecular and Developmental Biology of Keratins. A.A. Moscona and A. Monroy, eds. R.H. Sawyer, vol. ed. Academic Press, New York, Vol. 22, pp. 282-306, 1987). Beta keratins are produced only in the differentiated epithelial cells of the anterior ventral region of the tongue. Immunoelectron microscopy demonstrates that the alpha and beta keratins of the stratum intermedium and corneum of the anterior ventral region are found together in the large filament bundles characteristic of this region. The preexistence of the alpha keratins in the cells destined to produce beta keratins as well as the colocalization of these keratins in the filament bundles of these cells suggests that a functional relationship may exist between the alpha and beta keratins.

Avian scale development: XI. Immunoelectron microscopic localization of alpha and beta keratins in the scutate scale

Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions play important roles in morphogenesis, histogenesis, and keratinization of the vertebrate integument. In the anterior metatarsal region of the chicken, morphogenesis results in the formation of distinct overlapping scutate scales. Recent studies have shown that the dermis of scutate scales is involved in the expression of the beta keratin gene products, which characterize terminal differentiation of the epidermis on the outer scale surface (Sawyer et al.: Dev. Biol. 101:8-18, '84; Shames and Sawyer: Dev. Biol. 116:15-22, '86; Shames and Sawyer: In A.A. Moscona and A. Monroy (eds), R.H. Sawyer (Vol. ed): Current Topics in Developmental Biology. Vol. 22: The Molecular and Developmental Biology of Keratins. New York: Academic Press, pp. 235-253, '87). Since alpha and beta keratins are both found in the scutate scale and are members of two different multigene families, it is important to know the precise location of these distinct keratins within the epidermis. In the present study, we have used protein A-gold immunoelectron microscopy with antisera made against avian alpha and beta keratins to specifically localize these keratins during development of the scutate scale to better understand the relationship between dermal cues and terminal differentiation. We find that the bundles of 3-nm filaments, characteristic of tissues known to produce beta keratins, react specifically with antiserum which recognizes beta keratin polypeptides and are found in the embryonic subperiderm that covers the entire scutate scale and in the stratum intermedium and stratum corneum making up the platelike beta stratum of the outer scale surface. Secondly, we find that 8-10-nm tonofilaments react specifically with antiserum that recognizes alpha keratin polypeptides and are located in the germinative basal cells and the lowermost cells of the stratum intermedium of the outer scale surface, as well as in the embryonic alpha stratum, which is lost from the outer surface of the scale at hatching. The alpha keratins are found throughout the epidermis of the inner surface of the scale and the hinge region. Thus, the present study further supports the hypothesis that the tissue interactions responsible for the formation of the beta stratum of scutate scales do not directly activate the synthesis of beta keratins in the germinative cells but influence these cells so that they or their progeny will activate specific beta keratin genes at the appropriate time and place.

Expression of beta keratin genes during skin development in normal and sc/sc chick embryos

The expression of RNA sequences specific for scale beta (beta)-keratins has been followed during skin development in normal and scaleless (sc/sc) embryos. Total RNA from skin at various stages (36-46) of development, as well as newly hatched chicks, was immobilized on nitrocellulose paper and hybridized with a [32P]cDNA probe to beta-keratins (pCSK-12). Sequences for beta-keratins showed patterns of expression which were specific for each genotype and scale type examined. During the development of normal scutate scales, which are characterized by the formation of a beta stratum, RNA with beta-keratin sequences first appeared at stage 40, and continued to accumulate through hatching. RNA with beta keratin sequences appeared in scaleless skin between stages 40 and 41, was greatly diminished by stage 44, and was no longer present at stage 46. In normal reticulate scales, which like scaleless skin, do not develop a beta stratum accumulation of RNA with beta-keratin sequences was limited to a brief embryonic period between stages 42 and 44. These patterns of RNA expression correlated well with the appearance of beta-keratin polypeptides, suggesting that beta-keratin synthesis may be controlled at the level of keratin mRNA transcription. Correlations between the patterns of beta-keratin expression and histological events suggest that the brief accumulation of beta-keratin mRNA in scaleless skin and normal reticulate scales is related to the formation of the subperiderm (a protective layer of cells, peculiar to embryonic skin) while the continuous accumulation of beta-keratin mRNA during scutate scale development reflects the formation of a beta stratum.

Differences in the histogenesis and keratin expression of avian extraembryonic ectoderm and endoderm recombined with dermis

The responses of the chorionic ectoderm and allantoic endoderm (from 8-day chick embryos) to dermal induction were compared through tissue recombinants grafted onto the chorioallantoic membrane. The chorionic epithelium formed the appropriate epidermis with a fully developed stratum corneum in response to both spur and scutate scale dermises. Analysis of these recombinant epidermal tissues by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) demonstrated that tissue-specific expression of the alpha (alpha) and beta (beta) keratin polypeptides occurred. In addition, indirect immunofluorescence studies with antisera to alpha or beta keratins showed that the beta stratum, which characterizes the epidermis of spurs and scutate scales, was formed, and the alpha keratins were distributed as in the normal epidermal tissues. In contrast, although the allantoic endoderm became stratified in association with either spur or scutate scale dermis, a stratum corneum with a beta stratum did not develop. SDS-PAGE analysis demonstrated that while the characteristic beta keratins of scutate scales and spur were not detected, most of the alpha keratins normally elaborated by these structures were present, suggesting that even without histogenesis of a stratum corneum the expression of alpha keratins of endoderm could be regulated in a tissue-specific manner by dermis. This study also demonstrated that there are differences in the abilities of the chorionic and allantoic epithelia to respond to the same dermal cues, which may reflect earlier restrictions in their developmental potentials.

Avian feather development: relationships between morphogenesis and keratinization

Morphogenesis and expression of the alpha and beta keratin polypeptides are controlled by epidermal-dermal interactions during development of avian skin derivatives. We have examined the relationship between morphogenesis of the embryonic feather and expression of the feather alpha and beta keratins by routine histology, indirect-immunofluorescence, and SDS-PAGE. Initially beta keratins are expressed only in the feather sheath. Following barb ridge morphogenesis beta keratins can be detected in the barb ridge, coincident with the differentiation of barb ridge cells into eight distinct morphological types. Beta keratinization occurs in gradients; from feather apex to base, and from periphery of the barb ridge to the interior. The onset of beta keratinization in the barb ridges is paralleled by an increase in the major feather beta keratin polypeptides, as detected by SDS-PAGE. The alpha keratins are present in both the periderm and feather sheath at early stages of feather development, but become greatly reduced after hatching, when the down feather emerges from the sheath.

Altered keratin biosynthesis follows inhibition of scale morphogenesis by hydrocortisone

Hydrocortisone, administered onto the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of 7- to 10-day-old chick embryos, inhibits scale development, in a dose- and stage-dependent manner. The response is also region specific in that hydrocortisone treatment, at a specific dose and time, will completely block scutellate and interstitial scale development while leaving other scale types unaffected. Using histological, biochemical, and immunofluorescence techniques, we have shown that inhibition of scutellate scale morphogenesis prevents the subsequent formation of a beta stratum and alters expression of the alpha keratins. These data support the hypotheses that each avian scale type has its own distinctive temporal, morphological, and biochemical pattern of development; and in the case of scutellate scale development, hydrocortisone treatment alters keratin biosynthesis by interfering with earlier steps in morphogenesis.

Avian scale development. XI. Initial appearance of the dermal defect in scaleless skin

The chicken mutant, scaleless, is characterized by the total absence of scutate scales. Previous experiments have shown that the scaleless defect is expressed by the epidermal cells while the dermal cells are able to participate in normal scale morphogenesis. However, in association with 14- to 16-day scaleless dermis, normal epidermis or the simple ectoderm of the chorion failed to develop scutate scale epidermis with its characteristic beta stratum. Thus the question arises: since the scaleless dermis starts out functioning normally, when does it become defective? Heterogenetic, heterotopic associations have been performed between 7.5-day to 11.5-day scaleless dermis and a neutral responding tissue, the midventral apteric epidermis, from 10.5-day normal embryos. The results show that up until 9.5 day of incubation the scaleless dermis is able to give instructions for normal scutate scale formation, if combined with normal epidermis. However, after 9.5 days, the scaleless dermis is not able to induce scale formation in normal apteric epidermis. Thus, the functional defect of the scaleless dermis occurs during the time (9 to 10 days of incubation) when epidermal placodes appear in normal embryos. From the present data, at least two explanations are possible. Either the scaleless epidermis is unable to respond to the placode inducing properties being provided by the scaleless dermis and because an epidermal placode does not form the scaleless dermis becomes defective, or the scaleless epidermis does not provide some earlier cue necessary for the scaleless dermis to acquire its placode inducing capabilities.

Avian scale development. X. Dermal induction of tissue-specific keratins in extraembryonic ectoderm

Epidermal-dermal tissue interactions regulate morphogenesis and tissue-specific keratinization of avian skin appendages. The morphogenesis of scutate scales differs from that of reticulate scales, and the keratin polypeptides of their epidermal surfaces are also different. Do the inductive cues which initiate morphogenesis of these scales also establish the tissue-specific keratin patterns of the epidermis, or does the control of tissue-specific keratinization occur at later stages of development? Unlike feathers, scutate and reticulate scales can be easily separated into their epidermal and dermal components late in development when the major events of morphogenesis have been completed and keratinization will begin. Using a common responding tissue (chorionic epithelium) in combination with scutate and reticulate scale dermises, we find that these embryonic dermises, which have completed morphogeneis, can direct tissue-specific stratification and keratinization. In other words, once a scale dermis has acquired its form, through normal morphogenesis, it is no longer able to initiate morphogenesis of that scale, but it can direct tissue-specific stratification and keratinization of a foreign ectodermal epithelium, which itself has not undergone scale morphogenesis.

Epigenesis in developing avian scales. I. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of finite cell populations

Throughout a period from day 8.5 to day 12.5 of incubation of a chick embryo, a finite cell population of scale epidermis was characterized from various view points such as cellular organization, position, shape, area, number of constituent cells, density, and cell proliferation activity. In this study, the preparation of whole mount specimens was found to be quite valuable. On day 8.5, cells in the prospective scale region could be morphologically distinguished in the tarsometatarsus at a certain distance proximally away from the tarsometatarsal-phalangeal joint. --On day 9.25, about 1,100 cells became highly columnar in shape and densely associated, forming a placode structure. In both distally and proximally adjacent regions of this placode, the cells were semiquadrate in shape and loosely associated, leading to the formation of the interplacode structures. Such contrasting difference in cell organization between placode and interplacode was preserved from day 9.25 to day 11. During this period, both the area and number of constituent cells increased greatly in the placode and only slightly in the interplacode. However, cell proliferation activity was completely suppressed in the placode, and quite active in the interplacode. The activity in cell proliferation proved to be inversely correlated with the density of basal cells. Throughout the present study, it has been demonstrated that the early development of scale epidermis is achieved through a coordinated activity of the two discrete cell populations: the placode and interplacode.

Heterogeneity of low molecular weight epidermal structural proteins of chick embryonic tarsometatarsal skin. Effect of hydrocortisone on its accumulation with reference to differentiation of epidermal cells

Cornified layers of newly hatched chick shank skin were solubilized in 8 M urea by reduction followed by S-carboxymethylations. On Sephadex gel chromatography the solubilized proteins were separated into two distinct protein fractions (protein A and protein B). SDS-gel electrophoresis showed that the smaller protein fraction (protein B) contained two molecules with molecular weights of 15,000 and 17,000. Protein B was resolved into several fractions, pI 4.5-5.2, by preparative isoelectric focusing in the presence of 6 M urea and 0.1% Nonidet P-40. The fractions all contained the two molecules (Mr 15,000 and 17,000). The amino acid compositions of these fractions and 2-dimensional electrophoresis of epidermal protein by the method of O'Farrel indicated that the two proteins are each heterogeneous with respect to charge for reasons of microheterogeneity in the amino acid composition and varying extent of phosphorylation. When chick embryonic skin was cultured in a chemically defined medium, hydrocortisone, which induces the synthesis of protein A and results in keratinization of epidermis (Sugimoto, M., Tajima, K., Kojima, A. and Endo, H. (1974) Dev. Biol. 39, 295-307), did not accelerate the accumulation of protein B in epidermis; the normal pattern of protein B was not formed in epidermis of cultured skin with or without the hormone. Actinomycin D did not inhibit the synthesis of protein B, suggesting that the mRNA for this protein has a long life.

Correcting the phenotype of the epidermis from chick embryos homozygous for the gene scaleless (sc/sc)

Scutate scales are completely missing in the scaleless (sc/sc) mutant chicken. Organ cultures consisting of epidermis from sc/sc embryos combined with normal (+/+) scale dermis of the same developmental age produce the scaleless phenotype, but the same scaleless epidermis in combination with normal dermis from more differentiated embryonic scales forms perfectly normal scales.

Abnormal scale morphogenesis: relationship of polypeptide patterns to action of the scaleless gene

The polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (PAGGE) pattern of polypeptides isolated from normal scuttate scale epidermis of 1-week-old chicks was different from that of the anterior shank epidermis from 1-week-old scaleless mutant chicks. The PAGGE patterns of polypeptides isolated from normal and scaleless reticulate scale epidermis (from 1-week-old chicks) differed by only one band, whereas comparison of mutant's scuttate and reticulate patterns showed three band differences. These data are discussed in relation to the action of the scaleless gene on early morphogenesis of the two types of scales.

Avian scale development. Absence of an "epidermal placode" in reticulate scale morphogenesis

Timed-sequence studies have shown that reticulate scales on the ventral footpads of birds do not undergo "epidermal placode" formation during their morphogenesis, but arise as symmetrical evaluations similar to the scales of snakes and lizards. Unlike the scutellate scales on the dorsal surface of the foot, in which the formation of an "epidermal placode" and its subsequent morphogenesis result in disticnt outer and inner epidermal surfaces, the reticulate scales elaborate only one type of epidermal surface.

Avian scale development V. Ultrastructure of the chorionic epithelium induced by anterior shank dermis from the scaleless mutant

In combination with dermis from the anterior shank skin of the scaleless mutant, the chorionic epithelium forms an epidermis whose ultrastructural features are indistinguishable from those seen along the inner surface of normal scales and along the anterior shank of the scaleless mutant.

Xenoplastic combinations between chick chorionic epithelium and fetal monkey dermis

Fetel monkey dermis from the sole of the foot or ear induces the chick chorionic epithelum (CE) to form an epidermis that histologically resembles chick rather than monkey. These results support the conclusion that in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions between animals of different vertebrate classes the epithelium responds in a species-specific manner. Differences were noted, however, in the response of the avian CE to either the sole or ear dermis.