Dermo-epidermal interactions in reptilian scales: Speculations on the evolution of scales, feathers, and hairs

Ontogeny of the autopodial skeleton of the gecko Tarentola (Squamata: Phyllodactylidae)

Squamates exhibit evident diversity in their limb morphology. Gekkotans are a particularly diverse group in this respect. The appearance of toepads in gekkotans usually cooccurs with the reduction or loss of claws. The gecko Tarentola (Phyllodactylidae) shows a unique combination of features among geckos, with toepads, hyperphalangy, and dimorphism of claw expression (claws are retained on digits III and IV, but lost (manus) or strongly reduced (pes) on the remaining digits). Despite being a candidate model for studying embryonic skeletal development of the autopodium, no studies have investigated the autopodial development of the gecko Tarentola in detail. Here, we aim to follow up the development of the autopodial skeleton in T. annularis and T. mauritanica using acid-free double staining. The results indicate that the terminal phalanges of claw-bearing digits III and IV ossify earlier than in the remaining digits. This confirms the differential ossification as a result of claw regression in Tarentola. The strongly reduced second phalanges of digits IV in both the fore- and hindlimbs are the last ossifying phalanges. Such late ossification may precede the evolutionary loss of this phalanx. If this is correct, the autopodia of Tarentola would be an interesting example of both the hyperphalangy in digit I and the process of phalanx loss in digit IV. Delay in ossification of the miniaturised phalanx probably represents an example of paedomorphosis.

General aspects on skin development in vertebrates with emphasis on sauropsids epidermis

General cellular aspects of skin development in vertebrates are presented with emphasis on the epidermis of sauropsids. Anamniote skin develops into a multilayered mucogenic and soft keratinized epidermis made of Intermediate Filament Keratins (IFKs) that is reinforced in most fish and few anurans by dermal bony and fibrous scales. In amniotes, the developing epidermis in contact with the amniotic fluid initially transits through a mucogenic phase recalling that of their anamniotes progenitors. A new gene cluster termed EDC (Epidermal Differentiation Complex) evolved in amniotes contributing to the origin of the stratum corneum. The EDC contains numerous genes coding for over 100 types of corneous proteins (CPs). In sauropsids 2-8 layers of embryonic epidermis accumulate soft keratins (IFKs) but do not form a compact corneous layer. The embryonic epidermis of reptiles and birds produces small amount of other, poorly known proteins in addition to IFKs and mucins. In the following development, a resistant corneous layer is formed underneath the embryonic epidermis that is shed before hatching. The definitive corneous epidermis of sauropsids is mainly composed of CBPs (Corneous beta proteins, formerly indicated as beta-keratins) derived from the EDC. CBPs belong to a gene sub-family of CPs unique for sauropsids, contain an inner amino acid region formed by beta-sheets, are rich in cysteine and glycine, and make most of the protein composition of scales, claws, beaks and feathers. In mammalian epidermis CPs missing the beta-sheet region are instead produced, and include loricrin, involucrin, filaggrin and various cornulins. Small amount of CPs accumulate in the 2-3 layers of mammalian embryonic epidermis and their appendages, that is replaced with the definitive corneous layers before birth. Differently from sauropsids, mammals utilize KAPs (keratin associated proteins) rich in cysteine and glycine for making the hard corneous material of hairs, claws, hooves, horns, and occasionally also scales.

Cell adhesion and junctional proteins in the developing skin of snakes indicate they coordinate the differentiation of the epidermis

The development of scales and the sequence of epidermal layers during snake embryogenesis has been studied by immunofluorescence for the localization of cell adhesion, adherens, and communicating cell junctional proteins. At about 2nd/3rd of embryonic development in snakes the epidermis forms symmetric bumps at the beginning of scale formation, and they rapidly become asymmetric and elongate forming outer and inner surfaces of the very overlapped scales seen at hatching. The dermis separates a superficial loose from a deeper dense part; the latter is joined to segmental muscles and nerves, likely acting on scale orientation during snake movements. N-cam is present in the differentiating epidermis and mesenchyme of forming scales while L-cam is only/mainly detected in the periderm and epidermis. Mesenchymal N-cam is associated with the epidermis of the elongating dorsal scale surface and with the beta-differentiation that occurs in the overlapping outer surface of scales. Beta-catenin and Connexin-43 show a similar distribution, and they are mainly present in the periderm and differentiating suprabasal keratinocytes likely forming an intense connectivity during epidermal differentiation. Beta-catenin also shows nuclear localization in differentiating cells of the shedding and beta-layers at late stages of scale morphogenesis, before hatching. The study suggests that intensification of adhesion and gap junctions allows synchronization of the differentiation of suprabasal cells to produce the ordered sequence of epidermal layers of snake scales, starting from the shedding complex and the beta-layer.

Comprehensive molecular and cellular studies suggest avian scutate scales are secondarily derived from feathers, and more distant from reptilian scales

Amniote skin appendages such as feathers, hairs and scales, provide thermoregulation, physical protection and display different color patterns to attract a mate or frighten an adversary. A long-standing question is whether "reptile scale" and "avian leg scales" are of the same origin. Understanding the relation between avian feathers, avian scales and reptilian scales will enhance our understanding of skin appendage evolution. We compared the molecular and cellular profiles in chicken feather, chicken scales and alligator scales and found that chicken scutate scales are similar to chicken feathers in morphogenesis at the early placode stage. When we compared the expression of the recently identified feather-specific genes and scale-specific genes in these skin appendages, we found that at the molecular level alligator scales are significantly different from both chicken feathers and chicken scales. Furthermore, we identified a similarly diffuse putative stem cell niche in morphologically similar chicken and alligator scales. These putative stem cells participate in alligator scale regeneration. In contrast, avian feathers have a more condensed stem cell niche, which may be responsible for cycling. Thus, our results suggest that chicken and alligator scales formed independently through convergent evolution.

Transmission electron microscopic and immunohistochemical observations of resting follicles of feathers in chicken show massive cell degeneration

The molting cycle of feathers includes an anagen (growth) stage, a likely catagen stage where the feather follicles degenerate, and a resting stage where fully grown feathers remain in their follicles and are functional before molting. However, the cytological changes involved in the resting and molting stages are poorly known, so the results of an ultrastructural analysis of these processes in adult chick feathers are presented here. The study showed that the dermal papilla shrinks, and numerous cells present increased heterochromatin and free collagen fibrils in the extracellular matrix. Degeneration of the germinal epithelium of the follicle-the papillary collar-occurs with an initial substantial contraction of cells followed by an increase in heterochromatin, vesicle and lipid accumulation, and membrane and organelle degeneration. Desmosomes are still present between degenerating epithelial cells, but ribosomes and tonofilaments disappear. This suggests that cell necrosis initially proceeds as a major contraction resembling apoptosis-a process termed necroptosis, which was previously also shown to occur during the formation of barbs and barbules in mature down and pennaceous feathers. This study suggests that, aside from apoptosis, the collar epithelium degenerates due to external factors, in particular the retraction of blood vessels supplying the dermal papilla. In contrast, revascularization of the dermal papilla triggers a new phase of feather growth (anagen).

Review: cornification, morphogenesis and evolution of feathers

Feathers are corneous microramifications of variable complexity derived from the morphogenesis of barb ridges. Histological and ultrastructural analyses on developing and regenerating feathers clarify the three-dimensional organization of cells in barb ridges. Feather cells derive from folds of the embryonic epithelium of feather germs from which barb/barbule cells and supportive cells organize in a branching structure. The following degeneration of supportive cells allows the separation of barbule cells which are made of corneous beta-proteins and of lower amounts of intermediate filament (IF)(alpha) keratins, histidine-rich proteins, and corneous proteins of the epidermal differentiation complex. The specific protein association gives rise to a corneous material with specific biomechanic properties in barbules, rami, rachis, or calamus. During the evolution of different feather types, a large expansion of the genome coding for corneous feather beta-proteins occurred and formed 3-4-nm-thick filaments through a different mechanism from that of 8-10 nm IF keratins. In the chick, over 130 genes mainly localized in chromosomes 27 and 25 encode feather corneous beta-proteins of 10-12 kDa containing 97-105 amino acids. About 35 genes localized in chromosome 25 code for scale proteins (14-16 kDa made of 122-146 amino acids), claws and beak proteins (14-17 kDa proteins of 134-164 amino acids). Feather morphogenesis is periodically re-activated to produce replacement feathers, and multiple feather types can result from the interactions of epidermal and dermal tissues. The review shows schematic models explaining the translation of the morphogenesis of barb ridges present in the follicle into the three-dimensional shape of the main types of branched or un-branched feathers such as plumulaceous, pennaceous, filoplumes, and bristles. The temporal pattern of formation of barb ridges in different feather types and the molecular control from the dermal papilla through signaling molecules are poorly known. The evolution and diversification of the process of morphogenesis of barb ridges and patterns of their formation within feathers follicle allowed the origin and diversification of numerous types of feathers, including the asymmetric planar feathers for flight.

Making maxillary barbels with a proximal-distal gradient of Wnt signals in matrix-bound mesenchymal cells

The evolution of specific appendages is made possible by the ontogenetic deployment of general cell signaling pathways. Many fishes, amphibians and reptiles have unique skin appendages known as barbels, which are poorly understood at the cellular and molecular level. In this study, we examine the cell arrangements, cell division patterns, and gene expression profiles associated with the zebrafish maxillary barbel, or ZMB. The earliest cellular organization of the ZMB is an internal whorl of mesenchymal cells in the dermis of the maxilla; there is no epithelial placode, nor any axially-elongated epithelial cells as expected of an apical ectodermal ridge (AER). As the ZMB develops, cells in S-phase are at first distributed randomly throughout the appendage, gradually transitioning to a proliferative population concentrated at the distal end. By observing ZMB ontogenetic stages in a Wnt-responsive transgenic reporter line, TCFsiam, we identified a strongly fluorescent mesenchymal cell layer within these developing appendages. Using an in vitro explant culture technique on developing barbel tissues, we co-localized the fluorescent label in these cells with the mitotic marker EdU. Surprisingly, the labeled cells showed little proliferation, indicating a slow-cycling subpopulation. Transmission electron microscopy of the ZMB located these cells in a single, circumferential layer within the barbel's matrix core. Morphologically, these cells resemble fibroblasts or osteoblasts; in addition to their matrix-bound location, they are identified by their pancake-shaped nuclei, abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum, and cytoplasmic extensions into the surrounding extracellular matrix. Taken together, these features define a novel mesenchymal cell population in zebrafish, the "TCF(+) core cells." A working model of barbel development is proposed, in which these minimally mitotic mesodermal cells produce collagenous matrix in response to ectodermally-derived Wnt signals deployed in a proximal-distal gradient along the appendage. This documents a novel mechanism of vertebrate appendage outgrowth. Similar genetic signals and cell behaviors may be responsible for the independent and repeated evolution of barbel structures in other fish species.

Immunolocalization of FGF7 (KGF) in the regenerating tail of lizard suggests it is involved in the differentiation of the epidermis

Previous studies showed that Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGF) 1 and 2 are localized in the tissues of the regenerating tail in lizards. In the present immunofluorescence and immunoblotting study we have specifically analyzed the presence and distribution of FGF7 (keratinocyte growth factor) in the regenerating tissues of the tail. FGF7 immunoreactivity is mainly detected in the regenerating epidermis and in sparse fibroblasts of the underlying dermis of the regenerating scales while it is weaker in the other tissues such as the apical ependymal cells and early regenerating muscles. Immunolabeled mesenchymal fibroblasts are frequently present under the epidermis of the forming outer scale surface, a localization that might be connected to beta-cell differentiation in this region of the scale. FGF7 immunolabeling is also seen in differentiating beta-keratinocytes of the beta-layer in the regenerating scales. The present immunofluorescent observations suggest that FGF7 is specifically utilized as a paracrine factor during the process of differentiation of the epidermal layers in the regenerating scales and in particular for beta-cells differentiation.

An evaluation of the use of reptile dermal scutes as a non-invasive method to monitor mercury concentrations in the environment

Reptiles are ideal organisms for the non-invasive monitoring of mercury (Hg) contamination. We have investigated Hg bioaccumulation in tissue layers of reptile dermis as a basis for establishing a standardized collection method for Hg analysis. Tissue samples from freshwater turtle species Podocnemis unifilis and Podocnemis expansa and caiman species Melanosuchus niger and Caiman crocodilus, all from the Amazonian region, were analysed in this study. We first tested the relationships between Hg concentrations in keratin and bone to Hg concentrations in muscle to determine the best predictor of Hg concentration in muscle tissue. We then investigated the potential for measuring Hg concentrations across turtle carapace growth rings as an indicator of longer term changes in Hg concentration in the environment. Hg concentrations were significantly lower in bone (120 ng g(-1) caimans and 1 ng g(-1) turtles) than keratin (3600 ng g(-1) caimans and 2200 ng g(-1) turtles). Keratin was found to be a better predictor of exposure to Hg than muscle and bone tissues for both turtles and caimans and also to be a reliable non-invasive tissue for Hg analysis in turtles. Measurement of Hg in carapace growth rings has significant potential for estimating Hg bioaccumulation by turtles over time, but full quantification awaits development and use of a matrix-matched reference material for laser ablation ICPMS analysis of Hg concentrations in keratin. Realising this potential would make a valuable advance to the study of the history of contamination in mining and industrial sites, which have until now relied on the analysis of Hg concentrations in sediments.

Increased rate of hair keratin gene loss in the cetacean lineage

BACKGROUND

Hair represents an evolutionary innovation that appeared early on mammalian evolutionary history, and presumably contributed significantly to the rapid radiation of the group. An interesting event in hair evolution has been its secondary loss in some mammalian groups, such as cetaceans, whose hairless phenotype appears to be an adaptive response to better meet the environmental conditions. To determine whether different repertoire of keratin genes among mammals can potentially explain the phenotypic hair features of different lineages, we characterized the type I and II clusters of alpha keratins from eight mammalian species, including the hairless dolphin and minke whale representing the order Cetacea.

RESULTS

We combined the available genomic information with phylogenetic analysis to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the evolutionary patterns of keratin gene clusters. We found that both type I and II gene clusters are fairly conserved among the terrestrial mammals included in this study, with lineage specific gene duplication and gene loss. Nevertheless, there is also evidence for an increased rate of pseudogenization in the cetacean lineage when compared to their terrestrial relatives, especially among the hair type keratins.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we present a comprehensive characterization of alpha-keratin genes among mammals and elucidate the mechanisms involved in the evolution of this gene family. We identified lineage-specific gene duplications and gene loss among the Laurasiatherian and Euarchontoglires species included in the study. Interestingly, cetaceans present an increased loss of hair-type keratin genes when compared to other terrestrial mammals. As suggested by the 'less-is-more' hypothesis, we do not rule out the possibility that the gene loss of hair-type keratin genes in these species might be associated to the hairless phenotype and could have been adaptive in response to new selective pressures imposed by the colonization of a new habitat. Our study provides support for the idea that pseudogenes are not simply 'genomic fossils' but instead have adaptive roles during the evolutionary process.

Regeneration of reptilian scales after wounding: neogenesis, regional difference, and molecular modules

Lizard skin can produce scales during embryonic development, tail regeneration, and wound healing; however, underlying molecular signaling and extracellular matrix protein expression remains unknown. We mapped cell proliferation, signaling and extracellular matrix proteins in regenerating and developing lizard scales in different body regions with different wound severity. Following lizard tail autotomy (self‐amputation), de novo scales regenerate from regenerating tail blastema. Despite topological differences between embryonic and adult scale formation, asymmetric cell proliferation produces the newly formed outer scale surface. Regionally different responses to wounding were observed; open wounds induced better scale regeneration from tail skin than trunk skin. Molecular studies suggest that neural cell adhesion molecule enriched dermal regions exhibit higher cell proliferation associated with scale growth. β‐catenin may be involved in epidermal scale differentiation. Dynamic tenascin‐C expression suggests its involvement in regeneration. We conclude that different skin regions exhibit different competence for de novo scale formation. While cellular and morphogenetic paths differ during development and regeneration of lizard scale formation, they share general proliferation patterns, epithelial−mesenchymal interactions and similar molecular modules composed of adhesion and extracellular matrix molecules.

The power of the claw

Scratches on bones have routinely been attributed to tooth marks (a predominantly untested speculation), ignoring the effects of claws, perhaps because of the general assumption that claws are too soft to damage bone. However, some pathologies appears to be more compatible with claw rather than tooth impacts. Therefore, it is critical to determine if the claws of any animal are capable of scratching into the surface of any bone – a test and proof of concept. A tiger enrichment program was used to document actual bone damage unequivocally caused by claws, by assuring that the tiger had access to bones only by using its paws (claws). The spectrum of mechanisms causing bone damage was expanded by evidentiary analysis of claw-induced pathology. While static studies suggested that nails/claws could not disrupt bone, specific tiger enrichment activities documented that bones were susceptible to damage from the kinetic energy effect of the striking claw. This documents an expanded differential consideration for scratch marks on bone and evidences the power of the claw.

Cross-immunoreactivity between the LH1 antibody and cytokeratin epitopes in the differentiating epidermis of embryos of the grass snake Natrix natrix L. during the end stages of embryogenesis

The monoclonal anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody recognizing K1/K10 keratin epitopes that characterizes a keratinized epidermis of mammals cross-reacts with the beta and Oberhäutchen layers covering the scales and gastrosteges of grass snake embryos during the final period of epidermis differentiation. The immunolocalization of the anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody appears in the beta layer of the epidermis, covering the outer surface of the gastrosteges at the beginning of developmental stage XI, and in the beta layer of the epidermis, covering the outer surface of the scales at the end of developmental stage XI. This antibody cross-reacts with the Oberhäutchen layers in the epidermis covering the outer surface of both scales and gastrosteges at developmental stages XI and XII just before its fusion with the beta layers. After fusion of the Oberhäutchen and beta layers, LH1 immunolabeling is weaker than before. This might suggest that alpha-keratins in these layers of the epidermis are masked by beta-keratins, modified, or degraded. The anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody stains the Oberhäutchen layer in the epidermis covering the inner surface of the gastrosteges and the hinge regions between gastrosteges at the end of developmental stage XI. However, the Oberhäutchen of the epidermis covering the inner surfaces of the scales and the hinge regions between scales does not show cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) immunolabeling until hatching. This cross-reactivity suggests that the beta and Oberhäutchen layers probably contain some alpha-keratins that react with the LH1 antibody. It is possible that these alpha-keratins create specific scaffolding for the latest beta-keratin deposition. It is also possible that the LH1 antibody cross-reacts with other epidermal proteins such as filament-associated proteins, i.e., filaggrin-like. The anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody does not stain the alpha and mesos layers until hatching. We suppose that the differentiation of these layers will begin just after the first postnatal sloughing.

Evolution of hard proteins in the sauropsid integument in relation to the cornification of skin derivatives in amniotes

Hard skin appendages in amniotes comprise scales, feathers and hairs. The cell organization of these appendages probably derived from the localization of specialized areas of dermal-epidermal interaction in the integument. The horny scales and the other derivatives were formed from large areas of dermal-epidermal interaction. The evolution of these skin appendages was characterized by the production of specific coiled-coil keratins and associated proteins in the inter-filament matrix. Unlike mammalian keratin-associated proteins, those of sauropsids contain a double beta-folded sequence of about 20 amino acids, known as the core-box. The core-box shows 60%-95% sequence identity with known reptilian and avian proteins. The core-box determines the polymerization of these proteins into filaments indicated as beta-keratin filaments. The nucleotide and derived amino acid sequences for these sauropsid keratin-associated proteins are presented in conjunction with a hypothesis about their evolution in reptiles-birds compared to mammalian keratin-associated proteins. It is suggested that genes coding for ancestral glycine-serine-rich sequences of alpha-keratins produced a new class of small matrix proteins. In sauropsids, matrix proteins may have originated after mutation and enrichment in proline, probably in a central region of the ancestral protein. This mutation gave rise to the core-box, and other regions of the original protein evolved differently in the various reptilians orders. In lepidosaurians, two main groups, the high glycine proline and the high cysteine proline proteins, were formed. In archosaurians and chelonians two main groups later diversified into the high glycine proline tyrosine, non-feather proteins, and into the glycine-tyrosine-poor group of feather proteins, which evolved in birds. The latter proteins were particularly suited for making the elongated barb/barbule cells of feathers. In therapsids-mammals, mutations of the ancestral proteins formed the high glycine-tyrosine or the high cysteine proteins but no core-box was produced in the matrix proteins of the hard corneous material of mammalian derivatives.

Reptile scale paradigm: Evo-Devo, pattern formation and regeneration

The purpose of this perspective is to highlight the merit of the reptile integument as an experimental model. Reptiles represent the first amniotes. From stem reptiles, extant reptiles, birds and mammals have evolved. Mammal hairs and feathers evolved from Therapsid and Sauropsid reptiles, respectively. The early reptilian integument had to adapt to the challenges of terrestrial life, developing a multi-layered stratum corneum capable of barrier function and ultraviolet protection. For better mechanical protection, diverse reptilian scale types have evolved. The evolution of endothermy has driven the convergent evolution of hair and feather follicles: both form multiple localized growth units with stem cells and transient amplifying cells protected in the proximal follicle. This topological arrangement allows them to elongate, molt and regenerate without structural constraints. Another unique feature of reptile skin is the exquisite arrangement of scales and pigment patterns, making them testable models for mechanisms of pattern formation. Since they face the constant threat of damage on land, different strategies were developed to accommodate skin homeostasis and regeneration. Temporally, they can be under continuous renewal or sloughing cycles. Spatially, they can be diffuse or form discrete localized growth units (follicles). To understand how gene regulatory networks evolved to produce increasingly complex ectodermal organs, we have to study how prototypic scale-forming pathways in reptiles are modulated to produce appendage novelties. Despite the fact that there are numerous studies of reptile scales, molecular analyses have lagged behind. Here, we underscore how further development of this novel experimental model will be valuable in filling the gaps of our understanding of the Evo-Devo of amniote integuments.

Identification of reptilian genes encoding hair keratin-like proteins suggests a new scenario for the evolutionary origin of hair

The appearance of hair is one of the main evolutionary innovations in the amniote lineage leading to mammals. The main components of mammalian hair are cysteine-rich type I and type II keratins, also known as hard alpha-keratins or "hair keratins." To determine the evolutionary history of these important structural proteins, we compared the genomic loci of the human hair keratin genes with the homologous loci of the chicken and of the green anole lizard Anolis carolinenis. The genome of the chicken contained one type II hair keratin-like gene, and the lizard genome contained two type I and four type II hair keratin-like genes. Orthology of the latter genes and mammalian hair keratins was supported by gene locus synteny, conserved exon-intron organization, and amino acid sequence similarity of the encoded proteins. The lizard hair keratin-like genes were expressed most strongly in the digits, indicating a role in claw formation. In addition, we identified a novel group of reptilian cysteine-rich type I keratins that lack homologues in mammals. Our data show that cysteine-rich alpha-keratins are not restricted to mammals and suggest that the evolution of mammalian hair involved the co-option of pre-existing structural proteins.

Hard cornification in reptilian epidermis in comparison to cornification in mammalian epidermis

The structure of reptilian hard (beta)-keratins, their nucleotide and amino acid sequence, and the organization of their genes are presented. These 13-19 kDa proteins are basic, rich in glycine, proline and serine, and different from cytokeratins. Their mRNAs are expressed in beta-cells. The central part of beta-keratins (this region has been previously termed 'core-box' and is peculiar of all sauropsid proteins) is composed of two beta-folded regions and shows a high identity with avian beta-keratins. This central part present in all beta-keratins, including feather keratins, is the site of polymerization to build the framework of beta-keratin filaments. Beta-keratins appear cytokeratin-associated proteins. Their central region might have originated in an ancestral glycine-rich protein present in stem reptiles from which beta-keratins evolved and diversified into reptiles and birds. Stem reptiles of the Carboniferous period might have possessed glycine-rich proteins derived from exons/domains corresponding to the variable, glycine-rich region of cytokeratins. Beta-keratins might have derived from a gene coding for small glycine-rich keratin-associated proteins. The glycine-rich regions evolved differently in the lineage leading to modern reptiles and birds versus that leading to mammals. In the reptilian lineage some amino acid regions produced by point mutations and amino acid changes might have given rise to originate the central beta-pleated region. The latter allowed the formation of filamentous proteins (beta-keratins) associated with intermediate filament keratins and replaced them in beta-keratin cells. In the mammalian lineage no beta-pleated region was generated in their matrix proteins, the glycine-rich keratin-associated proteins. The latter evolved as glycine-tyrosine-rich, sulphur-rich, and ultra-sulphur-rich proteins that are used for building hairs, horns and nails.

Structural and Immunocytochemical Characterization of Keratinization in Vertebrate Epidermis and Epidermal Derivatives

This review presents comparative aspects of epidermal keratinization in vertebrates, with emphasis on the evolution of the stratum corneum in land vertebrates. The epidermis of fish does not contain proteins connected with interkeratin matrix and corneous cell envelope formation. Mucus-like material glues loose keratin filaments. In amphibians a cell corneous envelope forms but matrix proteins, aside from mucus/glycoproteins, are scarce or absent. In reptiles, birds, and mammals specific proteins associated with keratin become relevant for the production of a resistant corneous layer. In reptiles some matrix, histidine-rich and sulfur-rich corneous cell envelope proteins are produced in the soft epidermis. In avian soft epidermis low levels of matrix and cornified proteins are present while lipids become abundant. In mammalian keratinocytes, interkeratin proteins, cornified cell envelope proteins, and transglutaminase are present. Topographically localized areas of dermal-epidermal interactions in amniote skin determine the formation of skin derivatives such as scales, feathers, and hairs. New types of keratin and associated proteins are produced in these derivatives. In reptiles and birds beta-keratins form the hard corneous material of scales, claws, beaks, and feathers. In mammals, small sulfur-rich and glycine-tyrosine-rich proteins form the corneous material of hairs, horns, hooves, and claws. Molecular studies on reptilian beta-keratins show they are glycine-rich proteins. They have C- and N-terminal amino acid regions homologous to those of mammalian proteins and a central core with homology to avian scale/feather keratins. These findings suggest that ancient reptiles already possessed some common genes that later diversified to produce some keratin-associated protein in extant reptiles and birds, and others in mammals. The evolution of these small proteins represents the more recent variation of the process of cornification in vertebrates.