1
|
McInnes-Dean H, Mellis R, Daniel M, Walton H, Baple EL, Bertoli M, Fisher J, Gajewska-Knapik K, Holder-Espinasse M, Lafarge C, Leeson-Beevers K, McEwan A, Pandya P, Parker M, Peet S, Roberts L, Sankaran S, Smith A, Tapon D, Wu WH, Wynn SL, Chitty LS, Hill M, Peter M. 'Something that helped the whole picture': Experiences of parents offered rapid prenatal exome sequencing in routine clinical care in the English National Health Service. Prenat Diagn 2024; 44:465-479. [PMID: 38441167 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In October 2020, rapid prenatal exome sequencing (pES) was introduced into routine National Health Service (NHS) care in England. This study aimed to explore parent experiences and their information and support needs from the perspective of parents offered pES and of health professionals involved in its delivery. METHODS In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 42 women and 6 male partners and 63 fetal medicine and genetic health professionals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Overall views about pES were positive and parents were grateful to be offered the test. Highlighted benefits of pES included the value of the additional information for pregnancy management and planning for future pregnancies. An anxious wait for results was common, often associated with the need to make decisions near to 24 weeks in pregnancy when there are legal restrictions for late termination. Descriptions of dealing with uncertainty were also common, even when results had been returned. Many parents described pES results as informing decision-making around whether or not to terminate pregnancy. Some professionals were concerned that a non-informative result could be overly reassuring and highlighted that careful counselling was needed to ensure parents have a good understanding of what the result means for their pregnancy. Emotional support from professionals was valued; however, some parents felt that post-test support was lacking. CONCLUSION Parents and professionals welcomed the introduction of pES. Results inform parents' decision-making around the termination of pregnancy. When there are no diagnostic findings or uncertain findings from pES, personalised counselling that considers scans and other tests are crucial. Directing parents to reliable online sources of information and providing emotional support throughout could improve their experiences of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah McInnes-Dean
- Antenatal Results and Choices, London, UK
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon Mellis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Morgan Daniel
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Holly Walton
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma L Baple
- RILD Wellcome Wolfson Centre, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Clinical Genetics Service, School, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | - Katarzyna Gajewska-Knapik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Muriel Holder-Espinasse
- Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline Lafarge
- School of Human and Social Sciences, University of West London, London, UK
| | | | - Alec McEwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pranav Pandya
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Srividhya Sankaran
- School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Kings College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Women and Children Health, Evelina Women & Children's Hospital Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Audrey Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Dagmar Tapon
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Wing Han Wu
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sarah L Wynn
- Unique - Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group, Oxted, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Michelle Peter
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Middleton A, Costa A, Milne R, Patch C, Robarts L, Tomlin B, Danson M, Henriques S, Atutornu J, Aidid U, Boraschi D, Galloway C, Yazmir K, Pettit S, Harcourt T, Connolly A, Li A, Cala J, Lake S, Borra J, Parry V. The legacy of language: What we say, and what people hear, when we talk about genomics. HGG ADVANCES 2023; 4:100231. [PMID: 37869565 PMCID: PMC10589723 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The way we "talk" about genetics plays a vital role in whether public audiences feel at ease in having conversations about it. Our research explored whether there was any difference between "what we say" and "what people hear" when providing information about genetics to community groups who are known to be missing from genomics datasets. We conducted 16 focus groups with 100 members of the British public who had limited familiarity with genomics and self-identified as belonging to communities with Black African, Black Caribbean, and Pakistani ancestry as well as people of various ancestral heritage who came from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds. Participants were presented with spoken messages explaining genomics and their responses to these were analyzed. Results indicated that starting conversations that framed genomics through its potential benefits were met with cynicism and skepticism. Participants cited historical and present injustices as reasons for this as well as mistrust of private companies and the government. Instead, more productive conversations led with an acknowledgment that some people have questions-and valid concerns-about genomics, before introducing any of the details about the science. To diversify genomic datasets, we need to linguistically meet public audiences where they are at. Our research has demonstrated that everyday talk about genomics, used by researchers and clinicians alike, is received differently than it is likely intended. We may inadvertently be further disengaging the very audiences that diversity programs aim to reach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Middleton
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB4 8PQ, UK
| | - Alessia Costa
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Richard Milne
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB4 8PQ, UK
| | - Christine Patch
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Lauren Robarts
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Ben Tomlin
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Mark Danson
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Sasha Henriques
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB4 8PQ, UK
| | - Jerome Atutornu
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB4 8PQ, UK
| | - Ugbaad Aidid
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB4 8PQ, UK
| | - Daniela Boraschi
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB4 8PQ, UK
| | - Catherine Galloway
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB4 8PQ, UK
| | - Keith Yazmir
- Maslansky and Partners, 200 Varick Street, Suite 601, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Sachi Pettit
- Maslansky and Partners, 200 Varick Street, Suite 601, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Tegan Harcourt
- Maslansky and Partners, 200 Varick Street, Suite 601, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Alannah Connolly
- Maslansky and Partners, 200 Varick Street, Suite 601, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Amanda Li
- Maslansky and Partners, 200 Varick Street, Suite 601, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Jacob Cala
- Maslansky and Partners, 200 Varick Street, Suite 601, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Shelby Lake
- Maslansky and Partners, 200 Varick Street, Suite 601, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Julian Borra
- The Thin Air Factory Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ, UK
| | - Vivienne Parry
- Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, Dawson Hall, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Middleton A, Adams A, Aidid H, Atutornu J, Boraschi D, Borra J, Bircan T, Burch C, Costa A, Dickinson A, Enticknap A, Galloway C, Gale F, Garlick E, Haydon E, Henriques S, Mitchell M, Milne R, Monaghan J, Morley KI, Muella Santos M, Olivares Boldu L, Olumogba F, Orviss K, Parry V, Patch C, Robarts L, Shingles S, Smidt C, Tomlin B, Parkinson S. Public engagement with genomics. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 8:310. [PMID: 37928209 PMCID: PMC10624956 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19473.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
As detailed in its flagship report, Genome UK, the UK government recognises the vital role that broad public engagement across whole populations plays in the field of genomics. However, there is limited evidence about how to do this at scale. Most public audiences do not feel actively connected to science, are oftenunsure of the relevance to their lives and rarely talk to their family and friends about; we term this dis-connection a 'disengaged public audience'. We use a narrative review to explore: (i) UK attitudes towards genetics and genomics and what may influence reluctance to engage with these topics; (ii) innovative public engagement approaches that have been used to bring diverse public audiences into conversations about the technology. Whilst we have found some novel engagement methods that have used participatory arts, film, social media and deliberative methods, there is no clear agreement on best practice. We did not find a consistently used, evidence-based strategy for delivering public engagement about genomics across diverse and broad populations, nor a specific method that is known to encourage engagement from groups that have historically felt (in terms of perception) and been (in reality) excluded from genomic research. We argue there is a need for well-defined, tailor-made engagement strategies that clearly articulate the audience, the purpose and the proposed impact of the engagement intervention. This needs to be coupled with robust evaluation frameworks to build the evidence-base for population-level engagement strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Middleton
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | | | - Hugbaad Aidid
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | - Jerome Atutornu
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
- School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, England, UK
| | - Daniela Boraschi
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | | | - Tuba Bircan
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | - Claudette Burch
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | | | | | | | - Catherine Galloway
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | | | - Emma Garlick
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
| | - Em Haydon
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
| | - Sasha Henriques
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
- Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England, UK
| | - Marion Mitchell
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | - Richard Milne
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
- Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | | | - Katherine I Morley
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, England, UK
- Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Vivienne Parry
- Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UK
| | | | | | - Sam Shingles
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
| | - Cindy Smidt
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
| | - Ben Tomlin
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lang M, Zawati MH. Returning individual research results in international direct-to-participant genomic research: results from a 31-country study. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1132-1137. [PMID: 35478220 PMCID: PMC9553878 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01103-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper summarizes the results of a 31-country qualitative study of expert perspectives on the regulation of international "direct-to-participant" (DTP) genomic research. We outline how the practice of directly recruiting participants for genomic studies online complicates ethics and regulatory considerations for the return of individual research results. As part of a larger project supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, we prepared and distributed to 31 global legal experts a questionnaire intended to ascertain opinions and perspectives on the way international DTP genomic research is likely to be regulated. We found significant disagreement across jurisdictions on the most favorable approach to managing such results, with some countries favoring return by default and others preferring to return only with the express consent of research participants. We conclude by outlining policy considerations that should guide researcher practices in this context. As international DTP genomic research evolves, jurists and ethicists should be attentive to the ways novel approaches to subject recruitment align with existing ethical and regulatory norms in research with human participants. This paper is a preliminary step toward documenting such alignment in the context of the return of individual research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ma'n H Zawati
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huerne K, Palmour N, Wu AR, Beck S, Berner A, Siebert R, Joly Y. Auditing the Editor: A Review of Key Translational Issues in Epigenetic Editing. CRISPR J 2022; 5:203-212. [PMID: 35325565 DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2021.0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, most advances in site-specific epigenetic editing for human use are concentrated in basic research, yet, there is considerable interest to translate this technology beyond the bench. This review highlights recent developments with epigenetic editing technology in comparison with the canonical CRISPR-Cas genome editing, as well as the epistemic and ethical considerations with preemptive translation of epigenetic editing into clinical or commercial use in humans. Key considerations in safety, equity, and access to epigenetic editing are highlighted, with a spotlight on the ethical, legal, and social issues of this technology in the context of global health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Huerne
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Nicole Palmour
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Angela Ruohao Wu
- Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong S.A.R, China.,Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong S.A.R, China
| | - Stephan Beck
- University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Berner
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), London, United Kingdom
| | - Reiner Siebert
- Institute of Human Genetics, Ulm University and Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yann Joly
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Atutornu J, Milne R, Costa A, Patch C, Middleton A. Towards equitable and trustworthy genomics research. EBioMedicine 2022; 76:103879. [PMID: 35158310 PMCID: PMC8850759 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The representation of traditionally scientifically underserved groups in genomic research continues to be low despite concerns about equity and social justice and the scientific and clinical need. Among the factors that account for this are a lack of trust in the research community and limited diversity in this community. The success of the multiple initiatives that aim to improve representation relies on the willingness of underrepresented populations to make data and samples available for research and clinical use. In this narrative review, we propose that this requires building trust, and set out four approaches to demonstrating trustworthiness, including increasing diversity in the research workforce, and meaningful engagement with underrepresented communities in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner. Capacity building globally will ensure that actual and perceived exploitation and ‘helicopter’ research could be eliminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Atutornu
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; School of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, IP4 1QJ
| | - Richard Milne
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, CB2 8PQ
| | - Alesia Costa
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Christine Patch
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Anna Middleton
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, CB2 8PQ.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Arciero E, Dogra SA, Malawsky DS, Mezzavilla M, Tsismentzoglou T, Huang QQ, Hunt KA, Mason D, Sharif SM, van Heel DA, Sheridan E, Wright J, Small N, Carmi S, Iles MM, Martin HC. Fine-scale population structure and demographic history of British Pakistanis. Nat Commun 2021; 12:7189. [PMID: 34893604 PMCID: PMC8664933 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27394-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous genetic and public health research in the Pakistani population has focused on the role of consanguinity in increasing recessive disease risk, but little is known about its recent population history or the effects of endogamy. Here, we investigate fine-scale population structure, history and consanguinity patterns using genotype chip data from 2,200 British Pakistanis. We reveal strong recent population structure driven by the biraderi social stratification system. We find that all subgroups have had low recent effective population sizes (Ne), with some showing a decrease 15‒20 generations ago that has resulted in extensive identity-by-descent sharing and homozygosity, increasing the risk of recessive disorders. Our results from two orthogonal methods (one using machine learning and the other coalescent-based) suggest that the detailed reporting of parental relatedness for mothers in the cohort under-represents the true levels of consanguinity. These results demonstrate the impact of cultural practices on population structure and genomic diversity in Pakistanis, and have important implications for medical genetic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Arciero
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
| | - Sufyan A Dogra
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | | | | | - Theofanis Tsismentzoglou
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Qin Qin Huang
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Karen A Hunt
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Dan Mason
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Saghira Malik Sharif
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - David A van Heel
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Eamonn Sheridan
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John Wright
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Neil Small
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, UK
| | - Shai Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Mark M Iles
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hilary C Martin
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|