1
|
Ramai D, Clement B, Maida M, Previtera M, Brooks OW, Wang Y, Chandan S, Dhindsa B, Deliwala S, Facciorusso A, Khashab M, Ofosu A. Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (c-EMR) of Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps ≥20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 58:661-667. [PMID: 38227846 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence that cold endoscopic mucosal resection (c-EMR) can effectively treat large colorectal polyps. We aim to appraise the current literature and evaluate outcomes following c-EMR for nonpedunculated colonic polyps ≥20 mm. METHODS Major databases were searched. Primary outcomes included recurrence rate and adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS Nine articles were included in the final analysis, which included 817 patients and 1077 colorectal polyps. Average polyp size was 28.8 (±5.1) mm. The pooled recurrence rate of polyps of any histology at 4 to 6 months was 21.0% (95% CI: 9.0%-32.0%, P <0.001, I2 =97.3, P <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that recurrence was 10% for proximal lesions (95% CI: 0.0%-20.0%, P =0.054, I2 =93.7%, P =0.054) and 9% for distal lesions (95% CI: 2.0%-21.0%, P =0.114, I2 =95.8%, P =0.114). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that recurrence was 12% for adenoma (95% CI: 4.0%-19.0%, P =0.003, I2 =98.0%, P =0.003), and 3% for sessile serrated polyps (95% CI: 1.0%-5.0%, P =0.002, I2 =34.4%, P =0.002). Post-polypectomy bleeding occurred in 1% (n=8/817) of patients, whereas abdominal pain occurred in 0.2% (n=2/817) of patients. CONCLUSIONS C-EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm shows an excellent safety profile with a very low rate of delayed bleeding as well as significantly less recurrence for sessile serrated polyps than adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta
| | - Melissa Previtera
- University of Cincinnati Libraries, Donald C. Harrison Health Sciences Library, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Olivia W Brooks
- Internal Medicine Residency, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT
| | - Yichen Wang
- Mercy Internal Medicine Service, Trinity Health of New England, Springfield, MA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Smit Deliwala
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Mouen Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Faculty of Medicine, "Kore" University of Enna, Enna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, Paspatis GA, Moss A, Libânio D, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Voiosu AM, Rutter MD, Pellisé M, Moons LMG, Probst A, Awadie H, Amato A, Takeuchi Y, Repici A, Rahmi G, Koecklin HU, Albéniz E, Rockenbauer LM, Waldmann E, Messmann H, Triantafyllou K, Jover R, Gralnek IM, Dekker E, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy 2024; 56:516-545. [PMID: 38670139 DOI: 10.1055/a-2304-3219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP), to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends against the use of cold biopsy forceps excision because of its high rate of incomplete resection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends CSP, to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of small polyps (6-9 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 4: ESGE recommends hot snare polypectomy for the removal of nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps of 10-19 mm in size.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends conventional (diathermy-based) endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (≥ 20 mm) nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps (LNPCPs).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE suggests that underwater EMR can be considered an alternative to conventional hot EMR for the treatment of adenomatous LNPCPs.Weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may also be suggested as an alternative for removal of LNPCPs of ≥ 20 mm in selected cases and in high-volume centers.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that, after piecemeal EMR of LNPCPs by hot snare, the resection margins should be treated by thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation to prevent adenoma recurrence.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends (piecemeal) cold snare polypectomy or cold EMR for SSLs of all sizes without suspected dysplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends prophylactic endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of LNPCPs in the right colon to reduce to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 11: ESGE recommends that en bloc resection techniques, such as en bloc EMR, ESD, endoscopic intermuscular dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, or surgery should be the techniques of choice in cases with suspected superficial invasive carcinoma, which otherwise cannot be removed en bloc by standard polypectomy or EMR.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Ferlitsch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelical Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Mauro Risio
- Department of Pathology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Gregorios A Paspatis
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Vincente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Endoscopy Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital / IISLaFe, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leon M G Moons
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Probst
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Halim Awadie
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Department, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Hepatogastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Recherches Biochirurgicales, APHP-Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hugo U Koecklin
- Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN); Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Waldmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodastrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria ISABIAL, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ali S, Khetpal N, Fatima M, Hussain S, Ali A, Khan MA, Childs C, Hasan MK. The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e58462. [PMID: 38765346 PMCID: PMC11100549 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy remains the primary method for preventing colorectal cancer. Traditionally, hot snare polypectomy (HSP) was the method of choice for removing polyps larger than 5 mm. Yet, for polyps smaller than 10 mm, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become the favored approach. Lately, the use of CSP has expanded to include the removal of sessile polyps that are between 10 and 20 mm in size. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared to hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting polyps measuring 10-20 mm. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2020 to find studies that directly compared CSP to HSP for polyps larger than 10 mm. Our main focus was on assessing the risk of delayed bleeding after polypectomy; a secondary focus was the incidence of any adverse events that required medical intervention post procedure. Our search yielded three comparative studies, two observational studies, and one randomized controlled trial (RCT), together encompassing 1,193 polypectomy procedures. Of these, 485 were performed using CSP and 708 with HSP. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) was 0.36 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02, 7.13), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.11 and an I2 of 53%. For the risk of any adverse events necessitating medical care, the pooled OR was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.29), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.21 and an I2 of 35%. The quality of the two observational studies was deemed moderate, and the RCT was only available in abstract form, preventing quality assessment. Our analysis suggests that there is no significant difference in the incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding or other adverse events requiring medical attention between CSP and HSP for polyps measuring 10-20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Neelam Khetpal
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA
| | - Munazza Fatima
- Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Sana Hussain
- Department of Medicine, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Asad Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Christopher Childs
- Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wehbe H, Gutta A, Gromski MA. Updates on the Prevention and Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in the Colon. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2024; 34:363-381. [PMID: 38395489 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) remains a significant procedure-related complication, with multiple risk factors determining the risk including patient demographics, polyp characteristics, endoscopist expertise, and techniques of polypectomy. Immediate PPB is usually treated promptly, but management of delayed PPB can be challenging. Cold snare polypectomy is the optimal technique for small sessile polyps with hot snare polypectomy for pedunculated and large sessile polyps. Topical hemostatic powders and gels are being investigated for the prevention and management of PPB. Further studies are needed to compare these topical agents with conventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisham Wehbe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 University Boulevard, UH 3533, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Aditya Gutta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100 Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Mark A Gromski
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100 Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elsabaawy M, Elbahr O, Edrees A, Badr R, Kamal A, Afify S. Endoscopic band ligation versus hot snare resection for hyperplastic gastric polyps in cirrhotic patients. Clin Exp Hepatol 2024; 10:14-19. [PMID: 38765908 PMCID: PMC11100341 DOI: 10.5114/ceh.2024.136216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Managing patients with liver cirrhosis and gastric hyperplastic polyps (GHPs) is challenging. Despite being the standard technique for resection of GHPs, hot snare polypectomy (HSP) is risky in the setting of coagulation disorders associated with liver cirrhosis. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic band ligation (EBL), compared to HSP in resecting GHPs in cirrhotic patients. One hundred consecutive adults with liver cirrhosis and sessile or pedunculated GHPs were enrolled from December 2018 to December 2020. Cases were non-blindly randomized (1 : 1) to two groups to have GHPs managed by either EBL (group I) or HSP (group II). Data of demographic, clinical, and pathological factors, hospitalization expenses and outcomes of both treatment maneuvers were collected and statistically analyzed. Upper endoscopy was repeated for all patients at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment for recurrence detection. Between the two procedures, the mean operational time was significantly shorter in the EBL than the HSP group (15.1 ±3.80 min vs. 36.6 ±6.72 min, p < 0.001). Concerning complications, 94% of EBL cases had reported no complications compared to 78% with HSP. Bleeding occurred only with HSP (20%) with urgent need for adrenaline and/or argon plasma coagulation (p = 0.003). Regarding cost, it was significantly lower in EBL than HSP (280 ±2.02 EGP vs. 390 ±181.8 EGP, p < 0.001). However, the recurrence rate of GHPs and number of needed sessions were not significantly different. EBL proved to be a safer, more rapid, and economic maneuver when compared to HSP on resecting GHPs in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Elsabaawy
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Osama Elbahr
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Edrees
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Reda Badr
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Kamal
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Sameh Afify
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebeen El-Koum, Menoufia, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Niu C, Bapaye J, Zhang J, Liu H, Zhu K, Farooq U, Zahid S, Chathuranga D, Okolo PI. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cold snare polypectomy and hot snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:1458-1467. [PMID: 37539860 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become increasingly utilized to resect colorectal polyps, given its efficacy and safety. This study aims to compare CSP and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small (< 10 mm) and large (10-20 mm) colorectal lesions. METHODS Relevant publications were obtained from Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. The publication search was limited by English-language and human studies. Pooled mean difference and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for outcomes of interest. RESULTS Twenty-three studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled OR of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) in the CSP group versus the HSP group was 0.29 (P = 0.0001, I2 = 29%). Subgroup analysis according to lesion size showed a significant reduction in the DPPB rate in lesion sizes 10-20 mm (pooled OR 0.08, P = 0.003, I2 = 0%) and < 10 mm (pooled OR 0.35, P = 0.001, I2 = 27%). Pooled OR of major bleeding in the CSP group was 0.23 (P = 0.0004, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis by lesion size revealed a significant decrease in the rate of major bleeding in the CSP group for both lesion sizes 10-20 mm (pooled OR 0.11, P = 0.04) and < 10 mm (pooled OR 0.26, P = 0.003). Complete resection, en bloc resection, and recurrence rate were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Cold snare polypectomy was associated with a lower rate of DPPB and lower risk of major bleeding compared with HSP in both small and large polyps. CSP should be considered as the polypectomy technique of choice for colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengu Niu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jay Bapaye
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jing Zhang
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Hongli Liu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kaiwen Zhu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Umer Farooq
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Salman Zahid
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Dileepa Chathuranga
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Patrick I Okolo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minakata N, Murano T, Wakabayashi M, Sasabe M, Watanabe T, Mitsui T, Yamashita H, Inaba A, Sunakawa H, Nakajo K, Kadota T, Shinmura K, Ikematsu H, Yano T. Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:3668-3677. [PMID: 37398881 PMCID: PMC10311618 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection (ER) with bipolar snare, in which the electric current only passes through the tissue between the device’s two electrodes, is a prominent method used to prevent perforation due to electricity potentially. ER using bipolar snare with or without submucosal injection enabled safe resection of colorectal lesions measuring 10–15 mm in an ex vivo porcine model. ER with bipolar snare is expected to have good treatment outcomes in 10–15 mm colorectal lesions, with high safety even without submucosal injection. However, no clinical reports have compared treatment outcomes with and without submucosal injection.
AIM To compare the treatment outcomes of bipolar polypectomy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) to those with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).
METHODS In this single-centre retrospective study, we enrolled 10–15 mm nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (565 Lesions in 463 patients) diagnosed as type 2A based on the Japan Narrow-band Imaging Expert Team classification, resected by either HSP or EMR between January 2018 and June 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Lesions were divided into HSP and EMR groups, and propensity score matching was performed. In the matched cohort, en bloc and R0 resection rates and adverse events were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS Of the 565 lesions in 463 patients, 117 lesions each in the HSP and EMR groups were selected after propensity score matching. In the original cohort, there was a significant difference in antithrombotic drug use (P < 0.05), lesion size (P < 0.01), location (P < 0.01), and macroscopic type (P < 0.05) between the HSP and EMR groups. In the matched cohort, the en bloc resection rates were comparable between both groups [93.2% (109/117) vs 92.3% (108/117), P = 0.81], and there was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate [77.8% (91/117) vs 80.3% (94/117), P = 0.64]. The incidence of delayed bleeding was similar in both groups [1.7% (2/117)]. Perforation occurred in the EMR group [0.9% (1/117)] but not in the HSP group.
CONCLUSION Using bipolar snare, ER of nonpedunculated 10–15 mm colorectal lesions may be performed safely and effectively, even without submucosal injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhisa Minakata
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Murano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masashi Wakabayashi
- Department of Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Maasa Sasabe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Mitsui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Inaba
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hironori Sunakawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Nakajo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Kadota
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kensuke Shinmura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomonori Yano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 2778577, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ulrich JD, Rechberger P, Bachmann J, Herner A, V Figura G, Lahmer T, Phillip V, Mayr U, Haller B, Jesinghaus M, Schmid RM, Abdelhafez M, Schlag C. Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm with a Hybrid Snare: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study. Digestion 2023; 104:391-399. [PMID: 37331350 DOI: 10.1159/000530642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe and effective procedure for small colorectal polyps ≤9 mm. There are only limited data regarding CSP of larger neoplastic lesions. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CSP for polyps between 10 and 15 mm in size. METHODS In this prospective single-arm observational pilot study, patients with a least one polyp 10-15 mm were included. These polyps were preferably removed by CSP using a dedicated hybrid snare. The primary outcome was the histological complete resection rate (CRR) determined by pathologically negative margins of the specimen and no neoplastic tissue obtained from biopsies of the resection site margin. Secondary outcomes were en bloc resection rate, failure of CSP, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS A total of 61 neoplastic polyps were removed from 39 patients. Overall CRR was 80.3% (49/61). CSP was feasible in 78.7% (48/61) of polyps and the CRR in this group was 85.4% (41/48). When CSP failed (13/61; 21.3%), lesions were successfully resected by immediate HSP using the same snare with a CRR of 61.5% (8/13) in this group. One patient presented delayed hemorrhage after HSP of a polyp but successful hemostasis was achieved with two hemoclips. No other adverse events occurred. No recurrence was seen on follow-up colonoscopy in cases with incomplete resected polyps. CONCLUSION CSP seems to be efficient and safe in removing colorectal polyps up to 15 mm. A hybrid snare seems to be particularly advantageous for these polyps as it allows immediate conversion to HSP if CSP might fail in larger polyps. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04464837).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg D Ulrich
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany,
| | - Paul Rechberger
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jeannine Bachmann
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Herner
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guido V Figura
- Private Practice for Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Lahmer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Veit Phillip
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mayr
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Mohamed Abdelhafez
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schlag
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Winston K, Maulahela H, Raharjo DE, Tjoa K, Jonlean R. A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Hot Snare Polypectomy and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing Small Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e38713. [PMID: 37292560 PMCID: PMC10246601 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Both cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) have been shown to be effective methods for removing small colorectal polyps, but the optimal method for achieving complete resection remains unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic search of relevant articles using databases such as PubMed, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost. The search criteria included randomized controlled trials that compared CSP and HSP for small colorectal polyps ≤10 mm and the articles were screened based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using RevMan software (version 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom), and meta-analysis was performed with outcomes measured using pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Mantel-Haenszel random effect model was used to calculate the OR. We selected a total of 14 randomized controlled trials involving 11601 polyps for analysis. Pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the incomplete resection rate between CSP and HSP (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.88-1.73, p-value: 0.27; I2: 51%), en bloc resection rate (OR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.38-1.13; p: 0.13; I2: 60%), and polyp retrieval rate (OR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.59-1.57; p: 0.89; I2: 17%). For safety endpoints, there is no statistically significant difference in intraprocedural bleeding rate between CSP and HSP per patient analysis (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 0.74-7.54; p: 0.95; I2: 74%) and per polyp basis (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.72-4.72; p: 0.20; I2: 85%). CSP had lower OR for the delayed bleeding outcome when compared with the HSP group per patient basis (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.2-0.86; p: 0.02; I2: 25%), but not in the per polyp analysis (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.12-3; p: 0.53; I2: 0%). Total polypectomy time was significantly shorter in the CSP group (mean difference: -0.81 minutes; 95% CI: -0.96, -0.66; p:<0.00001; I2: 0%). Thus, CSP is both an efficacious and safe method for removing small colorectal polyps. Therefore, it can be recommended as a suitable alternative to HSP for the removal of small colorectal polyps. However, more studies are necessary to evaluate any long-term differences between the two methods such as polyp recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Winston
- Hospital Medicine, Bhakti Medicare Hospital, Sukabumi, IDN
| | - Hasan Maulahela
- Gastroenterology, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
| | | | - Kevin Tjoa
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IDN
| | - Reganedgary Jonlean
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IDN
- Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Tzu Chi Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Motchum L, Djinbachian R, Rahme E, Taghiakbari M, Bouchard S, Bouin M, Sidani S, Deslandres É, Takla M, Frija-Gruman NM, Barkun A, von Renteln D. Incomplete resection rates of 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps when using wide-field cold snare resection with routine submucosal injection. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E480-E489. [PMID: 37206693 PMCID: PMC10191736 DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-2392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Incomplete resection of 4- to 20-mm colorectal polyps occur frequently (> 10 %), putting patients at risk for post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that routine use of wide-field cold snare resection with submucosal injection (CSP-SI) might reduce incomplete resection rates (IRRs). Patients and methods Patients aged 45 to 80 years undergoing elective colonoscopies were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. All 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated polyps were resected using CSP-SI. Post-polypectomy margin biopsies were obtained to determine IRRs through histopathology assessment. The primary outcome was IRR, defined as remnant polyp tissue found on margin biopsies. Secondary outcomes included technical success and complication rates. Results A total of 429 patients (median age 65 years, 47.1 % female, adenoma detection rate 40 %) with 204 non-pedunculated colorectal polyps 4 to 20 mm removed using CSP-SI were included in the final analysis. CSP-SI was technical successful in 97.5 % (199/204) of cases (5 conversion to hot snare polypectomy). IRR for CSP-SI was 3.8 % (7/183) (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.7 %-5.5 %). IRR was 1.6 % (2/129), 16 % (4/25), and 3.4 % (1/29) for adenomas, serrated lesions, and hyperplastic polyps respectively. IRR was 2.3 % (2/87), 6.3 % (4/64), 4.0 % (6/151), and 3.1 % (1/32) for polyps 4 to 5 mm, 6 to 9 mm, < 10 mm, and 10 to 20 mm, respectively. There were no CSP-SI-related serious adverse events. Conclusions Use of CSP-SI results in lower IRRs compared to what has previously been reported in the literature for hot or cold snare polypectomy when not using wide-field cold snare resection with submucosal injection. CSP-SI showed an excellent safety and efficacy profile, however comparative studies to CSP without SI are required to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Motchum
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roupen Djinbachian
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Elham Rahme
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Simon Bouchard
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mickaël Bouin
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Sacha Sidani
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Érik Deslandres
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mark Takla
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Alan Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Trivedi M, Klapheke R, Youssef F, Wolfe S, Jih L, Chang MA, Fehmi SA, Krinsky ML, Kwong W, Savides T, Anand GS. Comparison of cold snare and hot snare polypectomy for the resection of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:657-664.e2. [PMID: 35618029 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Nonampullary duodenal adenomas can undergo malignant transformation, making endoscopic resection, often by hot snare (HSP) or cold snare polypectomy (CSP), necessary. Although CSP has been shown to be safer for removal of colon polyps, data comparing these techniques for the resection of duodenal adenomas are limited. Our aim was to compare the safety and efficacy of CSP and HSP for the removal of nonampullary duodenal adenomas. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to 2 academic medical centers with a histologically confirmed sporadic, nonampullary duodenal adenoma who underwent endoscopic snare polypectomy between January 1, 2007 and March 1, 2021. Patients with underlying polyposis syndromes were excluded. Outcomes included postprocedural adverse events and polyp recurrence. RESULTS Of 110 total patients, 69 underwent HSP and 41 underwent CSP. Intraprocedural bleeding was similar between both groups, but 7 patients in the HSP group experienced delayed adverse events versus none in the CSP group (P = .04). Fifty-four patients had complete polyp resection and subsequent surveillance endoscopies. Multivariate analysis showed polyp size to be associated with recurrence (per mm; odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.20; P < .01). Endoscopic resection technique (HSP vs CSP) was not a predictor of recurrence (P = .18). CONCLUSIONS HSP led to more delayed adverse events compared with CSP, whereas no significant differences on outcomes were noted, suggesting that CSP is equally effective and potentially safer for the removal of duodenal adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehul Trivedi
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Robert Klapheke
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, USA, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Fady Youssef
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, USA, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Scott Wolfe
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, USA, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Lily Jih
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, USA, San Diego, California, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Michael A Chang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, USA, San Diego, California, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Syed Abbas Fehmi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Mary L Krinsky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, USA, San Diego, California, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Wilson Kwong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Thomas Savides
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Gobind S Anand
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, USA, San Diego, California, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ket S, Tjandra D, Hewett DG, Kheir AO, Metz AJ, Moss A, Ogra R, Tam W, Raftopoulos S, Reynolds J, Secomb R, Cavalieri L, Urquhart P, Gibson PR, Brown G. Cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm on clopidogrel: Australian and New Zealand randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E745-E752. [PMID: 35692915 PMCID: PMC9187418 DOI: 10.1055/a-1813-1019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background and study aims Optimal peri-colonoscopic management of clopidogrel remains unclear. Cold snare polypectomy is safe and effective for removing polyps ≤ 10 mm and clips can control intraprocedural bleeding. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare continuation of clopidogrel versus temporary replacement of clopidogrel with aspirin for routine colonoscopy using cold snare polypectomy for polyps ≤ 10 mm.
Patients and methods Between August 2016 and August 2019, consenting participants at 12 centers were randomized to continuation of clopidogrel as a single or dual antiplatelet agent, or to temporarily take aspirin alone from 7 days prior to 2 days after routine colonoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to group allocation. Cold snare polypectomy was used to remove polyps ≤ 10 mm, with endoscopic clips applied if intraprocedural bleeding continued for > 2 minutes. Follow-up was performed on Day 30. The trial was stopped early due to delayed patient enrollment.
Results Two hundred seventy-six consecutive polyps ≤ 10 mm were removed from 107 patients. Of the patients, 61.7 % were male with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63 to 76.75). Fifty-nine patients continued on clopidogrel and 48 temporarily took aspirin instead. One hundred thirty-four polyps were removed from 49 patients who continued on clopidogrel vs 142 from 43 patients temporarily took aspirin instead (P = 0.33). Intraprocedural bleeding requiring clips occurred in 11 of 49 patients who continued on clopidogrel and in two of 43 patients who temporarily took replacing with aspirin instead (P = 0.02). More post-procedural minor bleeding was seen in the aspirin arm (six of 43 vs one of 49; P = 0.03). One patient in each arm had acute coronary syndrome, which was medically managed. None of the patients had clinically significant post-procedural bleeding.
Conclusions Continuation of clopidogrel in patients undergoing cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm does not appear to increase the rate of clinically significant postpolypectomy bleeding. It is associated with an increase in intraprocedural bleeding, which can be successfully treated with clips.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shara Ket
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Monash University, Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Douglas Tjandra
- Department of Gastroenterology, Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - David G. Hewett
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Queensland
| | - Ammar O. Kheir
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Queensland,Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew J. Metz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Department of Medicine – Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - William Tam
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia,University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia,Calvary North Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| | - Spiro Raftopoulos
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia,Peel Health Campus, Western Australia
| | - John Reynolds
- Biostatistics Consulting Platform, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robyn Secomb
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Peter R. Gibson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Monash University, Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gregor Brown
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Monash University, Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mehta D, Loutfy AH, Kushnir VM, Faulx AL, Smith ZL. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Endoscopy 2022; 54:367-375. [PMID: 33782926 DOI: 10.1055/a-1469-2644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : For large sessile colorectal polyps (LSCPs), endoscopic mucosal resection without diathermy ("cold endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR]") is gaining popularity because of its safety advantages over conventional EMR ("hot EMR"). Polyp recurrence rates have been reported to be higher with cold EMR. Considering these differences, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of these two techniques. METHODS : A decision analysis model was constructed for EMR of an LSCP. The decision tree incorporated the EMR method, clip use, procedural mortality, adverse events and their management, and polyp recurrence. Outcomes included days of lost productivity and marginal cost difference. Adverse event and recurrence rates were extracted from the existing literature, giving emphasis to recent systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. RESULTS : Through 30 months of follow-up, the average cost of removing an LSCP by cold EMR was US$5213, as compared to $6168 by hot EMR, yielding a $955 cost difference (95 % confidence interval $903-$1006). Average days of lost productivity were 6.2 days for cold EMR and 6.3 days for hot EMR. This cost advantage remained over several analyses accounting for variations in recurrence rates and clip closure strategies. Clip cost and LSCP recurrence rate had the greatest and the least impacts on the marginal cost difference, respectively. CONCLUSION : Cold EMR is the dominant strategy over hot EMR, with lower cost and fewer days of lost productivity. In theory, a complete transition to cold EMR for LSCPs in the USA could result in an annual cost saving approaching US$7 million to Medicare beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhairya Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Adam H Loutfy
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Vladimir M Kushnir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Ashley L Faulx
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Zachary L Smith
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bendall O, James J, Pawlak KM, Ishaq S, Tau JA, Suzuki N, Bollipo S, Siau K. Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2022; 14:477-492. [PMID: 34992406 PMCID: PMC8714413 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s282699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is a potentially severe complication of therapeutic colonoscopy which can result in hospital readmission and re-intervention. Over the last decade, rates of DPPB reported in the literature have fallen from over 2% to 0.3–1.2%, largely due to improvements in resection technique, a shift towards cold snare polypectomy, better training, adherence to guidelines on periprocedural antithrombotic management, and the use of antithrombotics with more favourable bleeding profiles. However, as the complexity of polypectomy undertaken worldwide increases, so does the importance of identifying patients at increased risk of DPPB. Risk factors can be categorised according to patient, polyp and personnel related factors, and their integration together to provide an individualised risk score is an evolving field. Strategies to reduce DPPB include safe practices relevant to all patients undergoing colonoscopy, as well as specific considerations for patients identified to be high risk. This narrative review sets out an evidence-based summary of factors that contribute to the risk of DPPB before discussing pragmatic interventions to mitigate their risk and improve patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Bendall
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Joel James
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Katarzyna M Pawlak
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Sauid Ishaq
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.,Medicine, Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Andy Tau
- Austin Gastroenterology, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Noriko Suzuki
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Steven Bollipo
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Keith Siau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Takeuchi Y, Shichijo S, Uedo N, Kawakami Y, Okubo Y, Tani Y, Sakurai H, Nakamura T, Miyake M, Matsueda K, Ishihara R. Safety and efficacy of cold versus hot snare polypectomy including colorectal polyps ≥1 cm in size. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:274-283. [PMID: 34324730 DOI: 10.1111/den.14096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Cold snare polypectomy (CSP; polypectomy without electrocautery) has spread rapidly worldwide during the past decade in what has been called "Cold Revolution". We performed a PubMed literature search for studies investigating CSP outcomes for colorectal polyps. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the complete resection rates (CRRs). The CRRs were similar regardless of the presence or absence of electrocautery, and the efficacy of submucosal injection for better CRRs is still controversial. Eight RCTs assessed the adverse events. The incidence of intraprocedural bleeding with cold procedures was comparable to or higher than that of hot procedures. The incidences of delayed bleeding were comparable to or lower with cold procedures, especially in patients taking anticoagulants. Fifteen studies have been reported on CSP for large (≥1 cm) colorectal polyps (10 retrospective studies, four prospective single-arm studies, and one prospective RCT). These studies reported that the safe cold procedures (a low intra- and post-procedural bleeding rate without perforation) could be implemented for lesions ≥1 cm. However, considering the incision depth of CSP and the local recurrence rate based on the current evidence, only large sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) can be candidates for cold procedures, and large adenomas should not be candidates for this procedure. Based on the current evidence, CSP seems to be the appropriate standard procedure for sub-centimeter colorectal low-grade adenomas due to its safety and simplicity. Thus, large SSLs can be candidates for cold procedures; however, careful inspection and further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the procedure's clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoki Shichijo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Noriya Uedo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yushi Kawakami
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuki Okubo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Tani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hirohisa Sakurai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiko Nakamura
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Muneaki Miyake
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Katsunori Matsueda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryu Ishihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yuan X, Gao H, Liu C, Cui H, Zhang Z, Xie J, Lu H, Xu L. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:331-341. [PMID: 34643573 PMCID: PMC8656331 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_180_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. METHODS Articles in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library related to the common endoscopic treatment of 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated polyps published as of April 2020 were searched. Primary outcomes were the R0 resection rate and en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcomes were safety and the recurrence rate. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were also performed. RESULTS A total of 36 studies involving 3212 polyps were included in the final analysis. Overall, the effectiveness of resection methods with a submucosal uplifting effect, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cold EMR and underwater EMR (UEMR), was better than that of methods without a nonsubmucosal uplifting effect [R0 resection rate, 90% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.94, I2 = 84%) vs 82% (95% CI 0.78-0.85, I2 = 0%); en bloc resection rate 85% (95% CI 0.79-0.91, I2 = 83%) vs 74% (95% CI 0.47-0.94, I2 = 94%)]. Regarding safety, the pooled data showed that hot resection [hot snare polypectomy, UEMR and EMR] had a higher risk of intraprocedural bleeding than cold resection [3% (95% CI 0.01-0.05, I2 = 68%) vs 0% (95% CI 0-0.01, I2 = 0%)], while the incidences of delayed bleeding, perforation and post-polypectomy syndrome were all low. CONCLUSIONS Methods with submucosal uplifting effects are more effective than those without for resecting 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps, and cold EMR is associated with a lower risk of intraprocedural bleeding than other methods. Additional research is needed to verify the advantages of these methods, especially cold EMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yuan
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hui Gao
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cenqin Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongyao Cui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haishu Second Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhixin Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiarong Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongpeng Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China,Address for correspondence: Dr. Lei Xu, Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital. No. 59 Liuting Street, Ningbo - 315010, China. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ortigão R, Weigt J, Afifi A, Libânio D. Cold versus hot polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection-A review of current evidence. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9:938-946. [PMID: 34355525 PMCID: PMC8498395 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colonoscopy with polypectomy substantially reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) but interval cancers still account for 9% of all CRCs, some of which are due to incomplete resection. Aim The aim of this review is to compare the outcomes of cold and hot endoscopic resection and provide technical tips and tricks for optimizing cold snare polypectomy. Results Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is the standard technique for small (≤10 mm) colorectal polyps. For large colonic polyps (>10 mm), hot resection techniques with use of electrocautery (polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection) were recommended until recently. However, the use of electrocoagulation brings serious adverse effects in up to 9% of the patients, such as delayed bleeding, post‐polypectomy syndrome and perforation. In recent years, efforts have been made to improve the polypectomy with cold snare in order to avoid these adverse effects of electrocoagulation without compromising the efficacy of the resection. Several authors have recently shown that the complication rates of CSP of polyps >10 mm is close to zero and recurrence rates varies between 5‐18%. Lower recurrence rates are found in serrated lesions (<8%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Ortigão
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
| | - Jochen Weigt
- Gastroenterology Department, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v.-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Afifi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v.-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Navas CM, Pohl H. Turn down the heat on large serrated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:660-661. [PMID: 33583522 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Navas
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Department of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chan A, Philpott H, Lim AH, Au M, Tee D, Harding D, Chinnaratha MA, George B, Singh R. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet management in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review of current evidence. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12:408-450. [PMID: 33269053 PMCID: PMC7677885 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i11.408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of endoscopic procedures, in both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes is continually expanding and evolving rapidly. In this context, endoscopists will encounter patients prescribed on anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications frequently. This poses an increased risk of intraprocedural and delayed gastrointestinal bleeding. Thus, there is now greater importance on optimal pre, peri and post-operative management of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy to minimise the risk of post-procedural bleeding, without increasing the risk of a thromboembolic event as a consequence of therapy interruption. Currently, there are position statements and guidelines from the major gastroenterology societies. These are available to assist endoscopists with an evidenced-based systematic approach to anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet management in endoscopic procedures, to ensure optimal patient safety. However, since the publication of these guidelines, there is emerging evidence not previously considered in the recommendations that may warrant changes to our current clinical practices. Most notably and divergent from current position statements, is a growing concern regarding the use of heparin bridging therapy during warfarin cessation and its associated risk of increased bleeding, suggestive that this practice should be avoided. In addition, there is emerging evidence that anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy may be safe to be continued in cold snare polypectomy for small polyps (< 10 mm).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Chan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hamish Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | - Amanda H Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
| | - Minnie Au
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
| | - Derrick Tee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | - Damian Harding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | - Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | - Biju George
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide 5112, South Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|