Role of surgical resection in the era of FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer

Important Radiologic and Clinical Factors for Predicting Overall Survival in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients Who Underwent FOLFIRINOX

BACKGROUND

To predict poor overall survival (OS) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) who underwent FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin) using clinical and computed tomography (CT) findings.

METHODS

A total of 189 patients with PAC who received FOLFIRINOX were retrospectively included. Two reviewers assessed CT findings and resectability based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. They determined tumor size changes according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Delta measurements were performed. Clinical results, such as whether to perform surgery, were also investigated. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify significant predictors for OS. A CT-based nomogram was constructed to predict OS.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients (39.2%) underwent surgery. For OS, rim enhancement of PAC on baseline CT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.77; P = 0.018), high delta tumor on baseline CT (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.55-3.91; P < 0.001), progressive disease at follow-up CT (HR, 8.89; 95% CI, 2.94-26.87; P < 0.001), and without surgery (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.49-5.30; P = 0.001) were important features related to poor prognosis. The nomogram showed good predictive ability for the survival.

CONCLUSION

Both clinical and CT findings were useful for predicting OS after FOLFIRINOX in PAC.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines

For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.

FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-institutional, Patient-Level, Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is currently unclear what chemotherapy should be preferred for patients with BRPC or LAPC.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and multi-institutional meta-analysis of patient-level data regarding the use of initial systemic therapy for BRPC and LAPC. Outcomes were reported separately for tumor entity and by chemotherapy regimen including FOLFIRINOX (FIO) or gemcitabine-based.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies comprising 2930 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS) calculated from the beginning of systemic treatment. OS for patients with BRPC was 22.0 months with FIO, 16.9 months with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab), 21.6 months with gemcitabine/cisplatin or oxaliplatin or docetaxel or capecitabine (GemX), and 10 months with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem-mono) (p < 0.0001). In patients with LAPC, OS also was higher with FIO (17.1 months) compared with Gem/nab (12.5 months), GemX (12.3 months), and Gem-mono (9.4 months; p < 0.0001). This difference was driven by the patients who did not undergo surgery, where FIO was superior to other regimens. The resection rates for patients with BRPC were 0.55 for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and 0.53 with FIO. In patients with LAPC, resection rates were 0.19 with Gemcitabine and 0.28 with FIO. In resected patients, OS for patients with BRPC was 32.9 months with FIO and not different compared to Gem/nab, (28.6 months, p = 0.285), GemX (38.8 months, p = 0.1), or Gem-mono (23.1 months, p = 0.083). A similar trend was observed in resected patients converted from LAPC.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BRPC or LAPC, primary treatment with FOLFIRINOX compared with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to provide a survival benefit for patients that are ultimately unresectable. For patients that undergo surgical resection, outcomes are similar between GEM+ and FOLFIRINOX when delivered in the neoadjuvant setting.

Induction Chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Simple Scoring System to Predict Effect and Prognosis

BACKGROUND

Effective chemotherapy (CTx) protocols as induction treatment provide increasing opportunities for surgical resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although improved survival after resection of LAPC with CTx has been reported for selected patients, reliable recommendations on the indication for conversion surgery after induction treatment are currently lacking. We investigated the factors predictive of prognosis in resected LAPC after FOLFIRINOX.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with LAPC undergoing curative resection after FOLFIRINOX between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Relevant clinical parameters and CT findings were examined. A scoring system was developed based on the ratio of hazard ratios for overall survival of all significant predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients with LAPC who underwent oncologic resection after FOLFIRINOX were analyzed. Tumor shrinkage, tumor density, and postchemotherapy CA19-9 serum levels were independently associated with overall survival (multivariate analysis: HR = 0.31, 0.17, and 0.18, respectively). One, two, and two points were allocated to these three factors in the proposed scoring system, respectively. The median overall survival of patients with a score from 0 to 2 was significantly shorter than that of patients with a score from 3 to 5 (22.1 months vs. 53.2 months, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor density is a novel predictive marker for the prognosis of patients with resected LAPC after FOLFIRINOX. A simple scoring model incorporating tumor density, the tumor shrinkage rate, and CA 19-9 levels identifies patients with a low score, who may be candidates for additional treatment.

Impact of conversion surgery on survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced (unresectable) pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is surgically unresectable and often treated with chemotherapy. Most previous studies, that have evaluated conversion surgery after chemotherapy, included heterogeneous patients and chemotherapy regimens, making it challenging to determine the impact of FOLFIRINOX. The present study evaluated the survival benefit of conversion surgery in patients with LAPC who received FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, and analyzed the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Patients with LAPC who received FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy for at least four cycles were included. During chemotherapy, surgical eligibility was determined based on radiologic and metabolic response to the treatment. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between the curative-intent surgery and non-resection groups, and the prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 279 patients were included. The rates of partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) were 34.1% and 51.4%, respectively, and 16.8% patients underwent curative-intent surgery. The median survival was significantly longer in the resection group than in the non-resection group (56 vs 21 months, P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, curative-intent surgery (HR 0.260; P < .001) was the most important factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion surgery after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy effectively rescues patients with LAPC. Patients without progression after FOLFIRINOX could be considered as potential candidates for conversion surgery.

Predictive factors for early recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients diagnosed with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma often experience early recurrence even after upfront R0 resection. This study aimed to define early recurrence and identify preoperative risk factors for early recurrence after upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study involved 500 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head at 10 institutions between 2007 and 2016. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological results were compared between early and non-early recurrence groups. Predictors of early recurrence were determined using statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Log-rank tests revealed a significant difference (P < .001) between recurrence within 3 to 6 months and 6 to 9 months. Early recurrence was subsequently defined as recurrence within 6 months. Patients were categorized into early recurrence (n = 104) and non-early recurrence groups (n = 389). The median overall survival of the early and non-early recurrence groups was 8.6 months and 42.6 months (P < .001), respectively. Preoperatively, high carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels ≥120 U/mL, retroperitoneal invasion, and diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictive risk factors for early recurrence according to multivariate analysis. Comparing survival rates among patients with 3, 2, 1, or none of these factors, the median overall survival was 17.6 (n = 90), 21.2 (n = 184), 47 (n = 141), and 61.5 (n = 73) months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal period that defines the early recurrence for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head is 6 months. Tumor size ≥20 mm, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels ≥120 U/mL, retroperitoneal invasion of the tumor, and the presence of diabetes mellitus are independently associated with early recurrence.

Outcomes of 5000 pancreatectomies in Korean single referral center and literature reviews

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic resection has higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates than other abdominal operations. Some centers have reported remarkable postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery. This study investigated the chronological trends of pancreatectomies by analyzing a large-scale database.

METHODS

The medical records of 5175 patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 1961 and 2019 at a single institution were reviewed. To investigate the chronological change in survival outcomes of periampullary cancer, the survival data of 3,108 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient age and the proportion with pancreatic cancer have increased over time. From 2015 to 2019, pancreatic cancer was the most common cause for resection (35.9%), followed by pancreatic cysts (24.8%) and common bile duct cancer (13.4%). The incidence of postoperative complications tended to decrease over time (26.0% from 2000 to 2004; 20.8% from 2015 to 2019). A comparison of survival outcomes of periampullary malignancies by period revealed that patients with pancreatic cancer significantly improved (5-year survival rate: 14.4% before 2000% vs 15.2% from 2000 to 2009% vs 29.0% after 2009, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative outcomes of pancreatic resection have improved over the past few decades. To improve outcomes in the future, an active multidisciplinary approach and postoperative management are required.

Prognostic Factors After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer Initially Metastatic to the Liver

Background

Resection of initially oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following response to first-line chemotherapy is controversial. We herein updated a previous case series to investigate the oncologic outcomes and preoperative factors that could drive the decision-making process.

Methods

This retrospective analysis was limited to patients with liver-only synchronous metastases who experienced complete regression of the metastatic component and underwent pancreatectomy between October 2008 and July 2020 at two high-volume institutions. Clinical-pathologic variables were captured, and inflammation-based prognostic scores were calculated. Recurrence and survival analyses were performed using standard statistical methods.

Results

Overall, 52 patients were included. FOLFIRINOX was the most employed chemotherapy regimen (63.5%). Post-treatment tumor size, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significantly decreased relative to baseline evaluation. The median time from diagnosis to pancreatectomy was 10.2 months, while the median time from chemotherapy completion to pancreatectomy was 2 months. Major postoperative complications occurred in 26.9% of patients, while postoperative mortality was nil. The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from pancreatectomy were 16.5 and 23.0 months, respectively, and the median OS from diagnosis was 37.2 months. At multivariable analysis, vascular resection, operative time, prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with OS. Operative time, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte count (SII), and PNI were associated with DFS.

Conclusions

We confirm promising outcomes of selected patients who underwent pancreatectomy following downstaging of liver metastases. The absence of vascular involvement of the primary tumor, good nutritional status, and low inflammatory index scores could be useful to select candidates for resection.

Can Surgical Resection of Metastatic Lesions Be Beneficial to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients with Isolated Lung Metastasis?

In the era of effective chemotherapy on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with distant metastasis, data on the effects of metastatectomy are lacking. So, we investigated the effect of metastatectomy on survival after metastasis in PDAC patients with isolated lung metastasis. This retrospective study analyzed 1342 patients who were histologically diagnosed with PDAC with distant metastasis from January 2007 to December 2018, of which 83 patients had isolated pulmonary metastasis. Additionally, 4263 patients were extracted from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and analyzed. Log-rank test and Kaplan−Meier survival analysis were used to analyze survival after metastasis. The five-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent pulmonary metastatectomy than in those who received only chemotherapy or supportive treatment (60.6% vs. 6.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed in the NCDB (two-year survival rate, 27.4% vs. 15.8% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, lung lesion multiplicity (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.004, p = 0.017), metastatectomy (HR = 0.278, p = 0.036), chemotherapy (HR = 0.434, p = 0.024), and chemotherapy cycles (HR = 0.300, p < 0.001) had significant effects on survival. Metastatectomy with primary pancreatic lesions is recommended with effective chemotherapy in PDAC patients with isolated lung metastasis.

Paradigm shift for defining the resectability of pancreatic cancer

Supported by the expanding indications for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), the concept of resectability has evolved from being mostly based on the anatomical tumor extent to considering the biological and conditional factors relevant to prognosis. Therefore, it is more reasonable to define the “criteria for surgical resection” instead of using the “(technical) resectability criteria.” NAT has been used in resectable PCs (RPC) with a high risk of early systemic recurrence, as predicted by various biological or anatomical markers. Moreover, the indications for NAT followed by conversion surgery or adjuvant surgery for borderline resectable or locally advanced PC (LAPC) are gradually expanding. Therefore, it is important to define the RPC group that will benefit from NAT and the LAPC group that will benefit from post-NAT surgery. At diagnosis, population-based approaches, such as prognostic stratification and staging systems and personalized outcome-based approaches using prognostic prediction models can be used to determine the criteria for treatment options. Standardized indications for conversion surgery are needed for patients who are initially treated with NAT. In addition to imaging-based morphological criteria, biological criteria, including CA19-9, and various metabolic criteria can be used to establish predicted outcome-based criteria. Multicenter collaboration is required to develop a large database with standardized data collection for various biomarkers and response data after NAT to establish more accurate outcome prediction models to define the new resectability criteria.

Selecting surgical candidates with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a review for modern pancreatology

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is likely to become the second leading cause of malignancy-associated mortality within the next 10 years and surgery remains the best hope for cure. The introduction of effective neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has increased the resection rate of PC in the era of contemporary pancreatology. This review summarizes the surgical selection criteria for locally advanced PC (LAPC), by focusing on the commonly used predictors for resectability and better overall survival outcome. Based on the currently available evidence, the role of change in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and patient's tumor response to NAT are critical in surgical candidacy selection. Although, consensus on surgical candidacy selection for LAPC still needs to be made, several data have shown that surgery provides the most optimistic chance of cure for PC. Surgery is, therefore, recommended whenever the benefits of pancreatectomy outweigh surgical complications, and the chance of local or distant metastases in the postoperative setting is low. This review also provided our insight for and experience in selecting surgical candidates by focusing on optimizing the overall survival of LAPC patients. Nevertheless, a collaborative approach to formulating standardized criteria for surgical candidate selection and treatment guidelines for LAPC is a common goal that pancreatologists worldwide should focus on.

Surgery for pancreatic cancer: current controversies and challenges

Two areas that remain the focus of improvement in pancreatic cancer include high post-operative morbidity and inability to uniformly translate surgical success into long-term survival. This narrative review addresses specific aspects of pancreatic cancer surgery, including neoadjuvant therapy, vascular resections, extended pancreatectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy and current status of minimally invasive surgery. R0 resection confers longer disease-free survival and overall survival. Vascular and adjacent organ resections should be undertaken after neoadjuvant therapy, only if R0 resection can be ensured based on high-quality preoperative imaging, and that too, with acceptable post-operative morbidity. Extended lymphadenectomy does not offer any advantage over standard lymphadenectomy. Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies offers some short-term benefits over open distal pancreatectomy, safety remains a concern with minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. Strict adherence to principles and judicious utilization of surgery within a multimodality framework is the way forward.

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF PANCREATIC CANCER TREATMENT WITH CANCER STEM CELLS

Of all cancers, pancreatic cancer has a significantly low rate of survival, mostly due to lack of early screening. Thus, once detected, pancreatic cancer is usually in later stages, reducing the likelihood of full recovery. The most common treatment strategy is chemotherapy, although several immunotherapeutic drugs show promising results in extending the patient’s lifespan. In this paper, we provide a validated mathematical model for the pancreatic cancer after fitting the parameter values, such as tumor growth rate, inverse carrying capacity, activation and decay rate of pancreatic stellate cells, with the use of the experimental data presented by Cioffi et al. cioffi2015inhibition For treatments with the chemotherapeutic drugs, Abraxane and Gemcitabine, and the immunotherapeutic drug, Anti-CD47, we modified the model accurately and compared the simulation results with the experimental data not only to model pancreatic cancer treatment correctly but also to move forward with other drug trials. Then, we include the cancer stem cells, which are known to initiate tumors and cause a relapse post-chemotherapy, per cancer stem cell hypothesis so that cancer progression can be assessed based on this phenomenon. In addition, we investigate optimal drug protocols. We find out that the most effective treatment is dual therapy due to extending survival time when compared to other drugs. Moreover, this study reveals that drug dose is more effectual than frequency of drug injection on account of different treatment scheduling with the same dose over a week. The model could be a starting point to investigate pancreatic cancer progression based on cancer stem cell hypothesis and shed light on novel drug discoveries.

A personalized approach to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its application in surgical practice

Pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma is an aggressive tumor which constitutes the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA. Despite the fact that surgery is an integral part of treatment, 5-year survival rates remain unfavorable, partly because of the complex genetic background, delayed diagnosis and also the absence of effective therapeutic approaches. To optimize surgery's results in recent years, the use of patients' genetic profile has been implemented through classification into subtypes; subtypes based on mutations which could efficiently lead oncologists to the path of targeted novel neoadjuvant regimens. This approach aims to achieve the most effective selection of patients undergoing surgery, to increase the number of potentially resectable tumors and also control micro-metastases, aiming to extend overall survival.

Predictors of conversion surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant or palliative FOLFIRINOX treatment using baseline and follow-up CT

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the predictive factors of conversion surgery in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) after neoadjuvant or palliative FOLFIRINOX using baseline and follow-up CT.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 189 patients who had undergone more than 4 cycles of FOLFIRINOX. We reviewed baseline CT (B-CT), 1st follow-up CT (1st-CT), and the preoperative or last follow-up CT (L-CT) and determined tumor size changes according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Extra-pancreatic perineural invasion (EPNI) and resectability using NCCN 2019 guideline were evaluated. Subgroup analysis by baseline resectability was performed.

RESULTS

B-CT included resectable (n = 25, 23.2%), borderline (n = 55, 29.1%), locally advanced (n = 44, 23.3%), and metastatic (n = 65, 34.4%) PAC. Seventy-four patients had undergone surgery (39.2%) with an 83.8% (62/74) R0 resection. For operability, resectable status at L-CT (hazard ratio (HR) 65.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-865; P = 0.002), RECIST (partial response) at 1st-CT (HR 3.6; 95% CI 1.1-11.7; P = 0.032), and baseline borderline resectability (HR 8.6; 95% CI 1.6-46.4; P = 0.013) were important predictors. Based on a size reduction cut-off of 22.2%, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Az) was 0.761 (sensitivity = 70.3%, specificity = 74.8%). In subgroup analysis, RECIST (partial response) at 1st-CT was a significant predictor of locally advanced PAC (HR 32; 95% CI 4.5-227, P 0.001), and the optimal cut-off was 22.2% (Az = 0.914; sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 75%). Baseline tumor size ([Formula: see text] 4 cm) (HR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3-24.3, P = 0.022) and unresectable status at 1st-CT (HR 4.8, 95% CI 1.1-20.6, P = 0.035) were significantly associated with margin-positive resection.

CONCLUSION

Both baseline and follow-up CT findings are useful to predict conversion surgery for PAC after FOLFIRINOX.

Usefulness of Imaging Response Assessment after Irreversible Electroporation of Localized Pancreatic Cancer-Results from a Prospective Cohort

Simple Summary

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel therapy that is being studied for the treatment of nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer. The current methods for evaluating the treatment response after IRE have been adapted from the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). However, it is uncertain whether these methods are appropriate, because the methods have not been validated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the correlation between survival time and the most commonly used imaging assessment methods on FDG-PET/CT scans. We confirmed that the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are correlated with survival, when applied as intended. However, no correlation was found when the often-used lesion-level method was used. FDG-PET-derived data did not provide any benefit over conventional CT data. Several novel methods for lesion-level analysis were explored.

Abstract

(1) Background: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablation technique that is being studied in nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Most published studies use imaging outcomes as an efficacy endpoint, but imaging interpretation can be difficult and has yet to be correlated with survival. The aim of this study was to examine the correlation of imaging endpoints with survival in a cohort of IRE-treated PC patients. (2) Methods: Several imaging endpoints were examined before and after IRE on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography. Separate analyses were performed at the patient and lesion levels. Mortality rate (MR) ratios for imaging endpoints after IRE were estimated. (3) Results: Forty-one patients were included. Patient-level analysis revealed that progressive disease (PD), as defined by RECIST 1.1, is correlated with a higher MR at all time intervals, but PD, as defined by EORTC PET response criteria, is only correlated with the MR in the longest interval. No correlation was found between PD, as defined by RECIST, and the MR in the lesion-level analysis. (4) Conclusions: Patient-level PD, as defined by RECIST, was correlated with poorer survival after IRE ablation, whereas no correlations were observed in the lesion-level analyses. Several promising lesion-level outcomes were identified.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following induction therapy: a systematic review of the published literature

Patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-PDAC) are traditionally treated with palliative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion surgery for initially UR-PDAC following induction therapy. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published between January 2000 and October 2020. Thirty-two series involving 1270 patients with 1056 locally advanced (LA) disease and 214 distant metastases were reviewed. The median mortality and morbidity was 0% (range 0-10%) and 47.1% (range 8.6-93.3%), respectively. Lymph-node negativity, negative resection margin and pathological complete response were observed in a median of 62.9% (38.5-90.9%), 84.4% (32.8-100%) and 6.7% (0-45.8%) of the specimens. The median survival was 32 (16.4-63.9) months with a 3-year survival rate of 47% (22-80%). Meta-analysis demonstrated that conversion surgery of initially UR-PDAC was associated with a significantly improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.45-0.66, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between the group with LA disease and that with distant metastases after conversion surgery (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.28, P = 0.790). Conversion surgery improved long-term survival of patients with initially UR-PDAC who had favorable response to induction therapy.

Essential updates 2019/2020: Multimodal treatment of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Current topics and updates in survival outcomes and prognostic factors

Overall survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is extremely poor. Therefore, the establishment of multimodal treatment strategies is indispensable for PDAC patients because surgical treatment alone could not contribute to the improvement of survival. In this review article, we focus on the current topics and advancement of the treatments for localized PDAC including resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC in accordance with the articles mainly published from 2019 to 2020. Reviewing the articles, the recent progress of multimodal treatments notably improves the prognosis of patients with localized PDAC. For resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemo or chemoradiation therapy, rather than upfront surgery, plays a key role, especially in patients with a large tumor, poor performance status, high tumor marker levels, peripancreatic lymph nodes metastasis, or neural invasion suspected on preoperative imaging. For borderline resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant treatments followed by surgery is a desirable approach, and maintenance of immunonutritional status during the treatments are also important. For locally advanced disease, conversion surgery has a central role in improving a survival outcome; however, its indication should be standardized.

Essential updates 2018/2019: Current topics in the surgical treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly malignant. While cancers in other organs have shown clear improvements in 5-year survival, the 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is approximately 10%. Early relapse and metastasis are not uncommon, making it difficult to achieve an acceptable prognosis even after complete surgical resection of the pancreas. Studies have been performed on various treatments to improve the prognosis of PDAC, and multidisciplinary approaches including non-surgical treatments have led to gradual improvement. In the present literature review, we have described the significance of anatomical and biological resectability criteria, the concept of R0 resection in surgical treatment, the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery, the remarkable development of perioperative chemotherapy, the effectiveness of conversion surgery for unresectable PDAC, and ongoing challenges in PDAC treatment. We also provide an essential update on these subjects by focusing on recent trends and topics.

Changes and prognostic impact of inflammatory nutritional factors during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Background

Inflammatory nutritional factors, such as the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS), and C-reactive protein/albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio, have prognostic values in many types of cancer. In this study, the prognostic values of inflammatory nutritional scores were evaluated in the patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).

Methods

A total of 49 patients who underwent pancreatectomy after NACRT from September 2009 to May 2016 were enrolled. The NACRT consisted of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions) with concurrent S-1 (60 mg/m²) delivered 5 days/week for 2 weeks before pancreatectomy. Inflammatory nutritional scores were determined before and after NACRT in this series.

Results

The median NLR increased after NACRT (from 2.067 to 3.302), with statistical difference (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, high pre-NACRT mGPS (2 or 1; p = 0.0478) and significant increase in CRP/Alb ratio after NACRT (≧ 0.077; p = 0.0036) were associated with shorter overall survival. All patients were divided into two groups according to the ΔCRP/Alb ratio after NACRT: the group with high ΔCRP/Alb ratio (≧ 0.077) and the group with low ΔCRP/Alb ratio (< 0.077). The group with high ΔCRP/Alb ratio after NACRT (n = 13) not only had higher post-NACRT CRP levels (p < 0.001) but also had lower post-NACRT Alb levels (p = 0.002). Patients in the group with high ΔCRP/Alb ratio lost more body weight during NACRT (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

In addition to pre-NACRT mGPS, ΔCRP/Alb after NACRT could provide prognostic value in the patients with PDAC treated by NACRT.

Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer to the Liver in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Which Role for Conversion Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The development of new polychemotherapy regimens in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC) have demonstrated significant improvement in clinical outcome, but evidence of the role of surgery following a favorable response to initial chemotherapy (IC) is still poor. The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of surgery following IC on survival in mPDAC, focusing on oligometastatic disease to the liver. Data retrieved from available literature confirm increased survival in selected oligometastatic patients treated with surgery + IC compared to IC alone (23–56 months vs. 11–16.4 months), suggesting a potential role for conversion surgery in a tailored and multimodality approach to pancreatic cancer patients. Better knowledge of tumor biology and a wide consensus on diagnostic criteria could lead to the consideration of oligometastatic disease as a particular and different stage of disease.

Abstract

Background: the improved survival rates achieved using new polychemotherapy regimens in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC) have suggested a potential role for surgery following a favorable response to initial chemotherapy (IC). The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the available evidence on the role of surgery following IC in mPDAC, focusing on oligometastatic disease to the liver (lmPDAC). Methods: studies reporting on patients with lmPDAC undergoing surgery after IC were included. The main outcome was overall survival (OS). Results: six observational retrospective studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Data were retrieved on 2087 patients. The most common IC regimen in patients undergoing surgery was FOLFIRINOX (N 84, 73%). Only three studies reported survival comparison among patients treated with IC+surgery vs. IC alone. Median OS varied from 23 to 56 months after conversion surgery vs. 11 to 16.4 months after IC alone. Conclusions: despite wide heterogeneity of chemotherapy regimens, different downstaging criteria and potential selection biases, patients with oligometastatic lmPDAC undergoing surgery after IC have significantly higher survival rates compared to patients treated with IC alone. Future trials are needed for definition of univocal criteria of downstaging, oligometastatic definition and indications for surgery.

Treatment Strategies for the Optimal Management of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With Curative Intent: A Systematic Review

Historically, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPDAC) was considered a palliative condition. Advances in treatment have resulted in studies reporting survival after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery similar to earlier disease stages. However, there is no consensus on optimal LAPDAC management. Our aim was a systematic review of published evidence on LAPDAC treatment strategies with curative intent. Twenty-eight studies defining LAPDAC as per established criteria and reporting outcomes after neoadjuvant treatment with a view to resection were included. Primary outcomes were resection rate and proportion of curative resections. Secondary outcomes were postoperative mortality, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Neoadjuvant treatment varied significantly, most common being the combination of folinic acid, fluorouracil, irontecan, and oxaliplatin. Median percentage of patients proceeding to surgery after completion of neoadjuvant pathway was 33.5%. Median resection rate was 25%. Median R0 resection was 80% of resected patients. These outcomes ranged 0% to 100% across studies. Ninety-day postoperative mortality ranged from 0% to 5%. Median progression-free and overall survival for resected patients were 12.9 and 30 months, respectively, versus 13.2 months overall survival for unresected patients. In conclusion, although there is wide variability in reported LAPDAC resection rates post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, retrospective data suggest that neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery results in improved survival.

The prognostic value of CA19-9 response after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly aggressive and refractory disease, with disappointing 5-year survival rates. Regarding the wide application of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with PC, how the post-neoadjuvant Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response could translate into a survival benefit is not clearly understood. We aimed to evaluate the correlation of the CA19-9 response with overall survival (OS) in patients with PC receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

An extensive electronic search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant articles, from which data relevant to independent correlations of the CA19-9 response with overall survival (OS) were extracted for analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Altogether, 17 eligible studies were identified in the systematic review. Pooled analysis showed that CA19-9 response > 50% (HR, 0.43; 95% CI 0.29-0.56; P < 0.001) and normalization of CA19-9 (HR, 0.52; 95% CI 0.42-0.63; P < 0.001) after neoadjuvant treatment are significantly associated with promising overall survival. The results also showed that optimal CA19-9 response after neoadjuvant treatment was significantly related to a favorable prognosis (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.55, P < 0.001; I2 = 45.1%, P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis revealed there were no prognostic difference between CA19-9 > 50% and normalization of CA19-9 after neoadjuvant treatment (P = 0.338), but the duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy over 4 months was significantly associated with expanded postoperative survival (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum CA19‑9 is valuable in determining the effect of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with PC. Post-neoadjuvant CA19-9 response > 50% or CA19-9 normalization was related to a more promising overall survival, suggesting that optimal CA19-9 response may be a suitable prognostic index to guide treatment decisions.

A Single-Institution Experience of Induction 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Surgery Versus Consolidative Radiation for Borderline and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

In the 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) era, the benefit of surgery versus definitive radiation for borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is not well defined. Our primary objective was to identify the survival impact of surgery for BR and LA unresectable PDAC treated with induction FOLFIRINOX.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective review of BR and LA PDAC treated with FOLFIRINOX from 2010 to 2018. The overall survival of surgery and consolidative radiotherapy was estimated in the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via the log-rank test. Subgroup analyses were conducted for BR and LA patients.

RESULTS

We identified 101 BR and LA PDAC patients treated with induction FOLFIRINOX (41 surgeries and 60 consolidative radiotherapies). Surgery patients were 68.3% (28/41) BR and 31.7% (13/41) LA, whereas consolidative radiotherapy patients were 30% (18/60) BR and 70% (42/60) LA. The R0 resection rate was 100%, and 46.3% (19/41) received preoperative radiation. Median overall survival of surgery versus consolidative radiotherapy was 42.3 versus 19.6 months, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, surgery associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery after induction FOLFIRINOX is feasible and has a clinically meaningful survival benefit in BR and LA PDAC.

Tumor marker recovery rather than major pathological response is a preferable prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with preoperative therapy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A pathological response of the primary tumor by preoperative therapy is a prognostic factor in various malignancies, and several histologic grading systems have been proposed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the prognostic value remains unclear. We explored the clinical implication of a major pathological response following preoperative therapy in patients with PDAC.

METHODS

Of 415 patients with resected PDAC, 137 who had undergone preoperative therapy were examined. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the predictors of a major pathological response, and survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients exhibited a major pathological response (≥90% tumor reduction). Significant associations were observed between a major pathological response and resectability (P = .001), the period of preoperative therapy (P < .001), RECIST best response (P < .001), the tumor size after preoperative therapy (P = .02), and tumor marker recovery (P < .001). Multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) revealed that both body mass index (≥20 kg/m2 ) (P = .035) and tumor marker recovery (P = .046) were independent prognostic factors. The median survival time (MST) of PFS for a ≥90% pathological response was better than that of a <90% response (P = .25); however, the MST for tumor marker recovery was significantly better than that without tumor marker recovery (P = .0054).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, a major pathological response was not extracted as a prognostic factor. Rather, tumor marker recovery was a preferable prognostic factor in patients with PDAC who had undergone preoperative therapy.

Von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie konsentierte Operationsindikationen beim duktalen Pankreasadenokarzinom

Hintergrund Die Zahl der Operationen für Pankreaskarzinome in Deutschland nimmt kontinuierlich zu. Das entspricht der steigenden Inzidenz dieser Erkrankung in der Bevölkerung. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die evidenzbasierten aktuellen Operationsindikationen bei Patienten mit Pankreaskarzinom zusammen.

Methode Als DGAV-Initiative wurde eine Arbeitsgruppe von Pankreasexperten eingerichtet. Diese formulierte konkrete Schlüsselfragen nach dem PICO-Schema, führte eine systematische Literatursuche in Medline und Cochrane Library (1989 – 2019) zu Studien und Leitlinien mit Aussagen zu Operationsindikationen bei Pankreaskarzinom durch und erstellte daraus resultierende evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen. Diese wurden innerhalb der CALGP im Rahmen eines Delphi-Verfahrens abgestimmt.

Ergebnisse Die Operationsindikation bei Pankreaskarzinom soll im Tumorboard von erfahrenen Pankreaschirurgen leitliniengerecht und unter Berücksichtigung der individuellen Besonderheiten der Patienten gestellt werden. Fortgeschrittene Infiltration der großen Viszeralgefäße, multiple Fernmetastasen und schwere Komorbiditäten, die einen Eingriff in Vollnarkose verbieten, stellen die häufigsten Kontraindikationen zur Operation dar. Die Therapie von Borderline-resektablen und primär resektablen oligometastatischen Patienten sowie solchen mit sekundärer Resektabilität nach neoadjuvanter Behandlung soll bevorzugt an Zentren und im Rahmen von Studien erfolgen. Die Behandlung an Pankreaszentren reduziert die Mortalität und verbessert das Überleben. Die palliative Bypasschirurgie kann bei endoskopisch nicht therapierbaren Gallenwegs- und Duodenalobstruktionen indiziert sein. Bei diagnostischen Schwierigkeiten kann die Staging-Laparoskopie mit histologischer Sicherung eingesetzt werden.

Schlussfolgerung Unabhängig von der Entwicklung erfolgversprechender multimodaler Behandlungskonzepte bleibt die chirurgische Resektion weiterhin der einzig kurative Therapieeinsatz. Wegen des hohen Anteils von primär fortgeschrittenen und metastasierten Pankreaskarzinomen spielt auch die palliative Chirurgie weiterhin eine wichtige Rolle in der komplexen Versorgung dieses Patientenkollektivs.

Immunohistological evaluation of mismatch repair deficiency in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with surgical resection

BACKGROUND

The frequency and prognosis of resected deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain unclear. This study was designed to assess the frequency of dMMR and its clinicopathological relevance in Japanese patients with PDAC treated with surgical resection.

METHODS

A total of 400 consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent surgical resection at Hiroshima University were enrolled. Immunohistochemical staining with four antibodies including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 was used to determine the presence of dMMR in PDAC specimens. Statistical analyses were applied to evaluate the frequency and clinical outcomes of these patients.

RESULTS

Of these 400 patients, five (1.3%) had dMMR (two had MLH1 deficiency, two had PMS2 deficiency, and one had MSH2 deficiency). We found a significantly different histological differentiation pattern between patients with dMMR and those with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) (P = .03). Univariate survival analysis revealed no significant differences between dMMR and pMMR in recurrence-free survival (P = .268) or overall survival (P = .173).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of dMMR in Japanese patients with resected PDAC is low, and we found no ethnic-specific differences when comparing the incidence to that in Caucasian patients. In the current study, no significant difference was found in recurrence-free and overall survival between patients with dMMR and pMMR.

Neoadjuvant Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer

Thanks to the development of modern chemotherapeutic regimens, survival after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has improved and pancreatologists worldwide agree that the treatment of PDAC demands a multidisciplinary approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) plays a major role in the treatment of PDAC since only about 20% of patients are considered resectable at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, increasing data demonstrating the benefits of NAT for borderline resectable/locally advanced PDAC are driving a shift from up-front surgery to NAT in the multidisciplinary treatment of even resectable PDAC. Our understanding of the role of NAT in PDAC has evolved from tumor shrinkage to controlling potential micrometastases and selecting patients who may benefit from radical resection. The present review gives an overview on the current literature of NAT concepts for BR/LA PDAC and resectable PDAC.

Surgical indication for and desirable outcomes of conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Aim of this review is to propose an acceptable surgical indication for conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable (UR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by considering desirable outcomes, including resectability, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). A comprehensive literature search of PubMed was conducted through July 15, 2019. Eligible studies were those reporting on patients with UR-PDAC who underwent surgery. We excluded case reports with fewer than 10 patients, insufficient descriptions of survival data, and palliative surgery. When patients with UR-PDAC with no progression after chemo(radiation) therapy were offered surgical exploration, resectability and median survival time (MST) of those who underwent conversion surgery ranged from 20% to 69% (median, 52%) and from 19.5 to 33 months (median, 21.9 months), respectively. When conversion surgery was carried out in patients with expected margin-negative resection or with clinical response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), resectability and MST ranged from 18% to 27% (median, 20%) and from 21 to 35.3 months (median, 30 months), respectively. Among patients who underwent conversion surgery based on clinical response and decreased CA19-9 level after multimodal treatment, resectability and MST ranged from 2% to 24% (median, 4.1%) and from 24.1 to 64 months (median, 36 months), respectively. Decreased CA19-9 level was a predictor of resectability, OS and DFS by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, decision-making for conversion surgery based on clinical response and decreased CA19-9 level after multimodal treatment may be appropriate. With regard to desirable outcomes of OS and DFS, conversion surgery may provide improved survival for patients with initial UR-PDAC.