Gp41 and Gag amino acids linked to HIV-1 protease inhibitor-based second-line failure in HIV-1 subtype A from Western Kenya

Acquired Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in Rhode Island, USA, 2004-2021

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquired drug resistance (ADR) compromises antiretroviral therapy (ART).

METHODS

We aggregated all HIV-1 protease-reverse transcriptase-integrase sequences over 2004-2021 at the largest HIV center in Rhode Island and evaluated ADR extent, trends, and impact using Stanford Database tools. Trends were measured with Mann-Kendall statistic, and multivariable regressions evaluated resistance predictors.

RESULTS

Sequences were available for 914 ART-experienced persons. Overall ADR to any drug decreased from 77% to 49% (-0.66 Mann-Kendall statistic); nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 65% to 32%, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 53% to 43%, and protease inhibitors 28% to 7% (2004-2021), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors 16% to 13% (2017-2021). Multiclass resistance decreased from 44% to 12% (2-class) and 12% to 6% (3-class). In 2021, 94% had at least one 3-drug or 2-drug one-pill-once-daily (OPOD) option. Males and those exposed to more ART regimens were more likely to have ≥2-class resistance, and higher regimen exposure was also associated with fewer OPOD options.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive analyses within a densely-sampled HIV epidemic over 2004-2021 demonstrated decreasing ADR. Continued ADR monitoring is important to maintain ART success, particularly with rising INSTI use in all lines of therapy and 2-drug and long-acting formulations.

HIV-1 envelope facilitates the development of protease inhibitor resistance through acquiring mutations associated with viral entry and immune escape

Introduction

There is increasing evidence supporting a role for HIV-1 envelope in the development of Protease Inhibitor drug resistance, and a recent report from our group suggested that Env mutations co-evolve with Gag-Protease mutations in the pathway to Lopinavir resistance. In this study, we investigated the effect of co-evolving Env mutations on virus function and structure.

Methods

Co-receptor usage and n-linked glycosylation were investigated using Geno2Pheno as well as tools available at the Los Alamos sequence database. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed using Amber 18 and analyzed using Cpptraj, and molecular interactions were calculated using the Ring server.

Results

The results showed that under Protease Inhibitor drug selection pressure, the envelope gene modulates viral entry by protecting the virus from antibody recognition through the increased length and number of N-glycosylation sites observed in V1/V2 and to some extent V5. Furthermore, gp120 mutations appear to modulate viral entry through a switch to the CXCR4 coreceptor, induced by higher charge in the V3 region and specific mutations at the coreceptor binding sites. In gp41, S534A formed a hydrogen bond with L602 found in the disulfide loop region between the Heptad Repeat 1 and Heptad Repeat 2 domains and could negatively affect the association of gp120-gp41 during viral entry. Lastly, P724Q/S formed both intermolecular and intramolecular interactions with residues within the Kennedy loop, a known epitope.

Discussion

In conclusion, the results suggest that mutations in envelope during Protease Inhibitor treatment failure are related to immune escape and that S534A mutants could preferentially use the cell-to-cell route of infection.

Epistatic pathways can drive HIV-1 escape from integrase strand transfer inhibitors

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have been reported to experience virological failure in the absence of resistance mutations in integrase. To elucidate INSTI resistance mechanisms, we propagated HIV-1 in the presence of escalating concentrations of the INSTI dolutegravir. HIV-1 became resistant to dolutegravir by sequentially acquiring mutations in the envelope glycoprotein (Env) and the nucleocapsid protein. The selected Env mutations enhance the ability of the virus to spread via cell-cell transfer, thereby increasing the multiplicity of infection (MOI). While the selected Env mutations confer broad resistance to multiple classes of antiretrovirals, the fold resistance is ~2 logs higher for INSTIs than for other classes of drugs. We demonstrate that INSTIs are more readily overwhelmed by high MOI than other classes of antiretrovirals. Our findings advance the understanding of how HIV-1 can evolve resistance to antiretrovirals, including the potent INSTIs, in the absence of drug-target gene mutations.

Potential Associations of Mutations within the HIV-1 Env and Gag Genes Conferring Protease Inhibitor (PI) Drug Resistance

An increasing number of patients in Africa are experiencing virological failure on a second-line antiretroviral protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen, even without resistance-associated mutations in the protease region, suggesting a potential role of other genes in PI resistance. Here, we investigated the prevalence of mutations associated with Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) failure in the Envelope gene and the possible coevolution with mutations within the Gag-protease (gag-PR) region. Env and Gag-PR sequences generated from 24 HIV-1 subtype C infected patients failing an LPV/r inclusive treatment regimen and 344 subtype C drug-naïve isolates downloaded from the Los Alamos Database were analyzed. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine the differences in mutation frequency. Bayesian network probability was applied to determine the relationship between mutations occurring within the env and gag-PR regions and LPV/r treatment. Thirty-five mutations in the env region had significantly higher frequencies in LPV/r-treated patients. A combination of Env and Gag-PR mutations was associated with a potential pathway to LPV/r resistance. While Env mutations were not directly associated with LPV/r resistance, they may exert pressure through the Gag and minor PR mutation pathways. Further investigations using site-directed mutagenesis are needed to determine the impact of Env mutations alone and in combination with Gag-PR mutations on viral fitness and LPV/r efficacy.

Mechanistic Analysis of the Broad Antiretroviral Resistance Conferred by HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Mutations

Despite the effectiveness of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, virological failure can occur in some HIV-1-infected patients in the absence of mutations in drug target genes. We previously reported that, in vitro, the lab-adapted HIV-1 NL4-3 strain can acquire resistance to the integrase inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) by acquiring mutations in the envelope glycoprotein (Env) that enhance viral cell-cell transmission. In this study, we investigated whether Env-mediated drug resistance extends to ARVs other than DTG and whether it occurs in other HIV-1 isolates. We demonstrate that Env mutations can reduce susceptibility to multiple classes of ARVs and also increase resistance to ARVs when coupled with target-gene mutations. We observe that the NL4-3 Env mutants display a more stable and closed Env conformation and lower rates of gp120 shedding than the WT virus. We also selected for Env mutations in clinically relevant HIV-1 isolates in the presence of ARVs. These Env mutants exhibit reduced susceptibility to DTG, with effects on replication and Env structure that are HIV-1 strain dependent. Finally, to examine a possible in vivo relevance of Env-mediated drug resistance, we performed single-genome sequencing of plasma-derived virus from five patients failing an integrase inhibitor-containing regimen. This analysis revealed the presence of several mutations in the highly conserved gp120-gp41 interface despite low frequency of resistance mutations in integrase. These results suggest that mutations in Env that enhance the ability of HIV-1 to spread via a cell-cell route may increase the opportunity for the virus to acquire high-level drug resistance mutations in ARV target genes.IMPORTANCE Although combination antiretroviral (ARV) therapy is highly effective in controlling the progression of HIV disease, drug resistance can be a major obstacle. Recent findings suggest that resistance can develop without ARV target gene mutations. We previously reported that mutations in the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) confer resistance to an integrase inhibitor. Here, we investigated the mechanism of Env-mediated drug resistance and the possible contribution of Env to virological failure in vivo We demonstrate that Env mutations can reduce sensitivity to major classes of ARVs in multiple viral isolates and define the effect of the Env mutations on Env subunit interactions. We observed that many Env mutations accumulated in individuals failing integrase inhibitor therapy despite a low frequency of resistance mutations in integrase. Our findings suggest that broad-based Env-mediated drug resistance may impact therapeutic strategies and provide clues toward understanding how ARV-treated individuals fail therapy without acquiring mutations in drug target genes.

In Vivo Emergence of a Novel Protease Inhibitor Resistance Signature in HIV-1 Matrix

Protease inhibitors (PIs) are the second- and last-line therapy for the majority of HIV-infected patients worldwide. Only around 20% of individuals who fail PI regimens develop major resistance mutations in protease. We sought to explore the role of mutations in gag-pro genotypic and phenotypic changes in viruses from six Nigerian patients who failed PI-based regimens without known drug resistance-associated protease mutations in order to identify novel determinants of PI resistance. Target enrichment and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with the Illumina MiSeq system were followed by haplotype reconstruction. Full-length Gag-protease gene regions were amplified from baseline (pre-PI) and virologic failure (VF) samples, sequenced, and used to construct gag-pro-pseudotyped viruses. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using maximum-likelihood methods. Susceptibility to lopinavir (LPV) and darunavir (DRV) was measured using a single-cycle replication assay. Western blotting was used to analyze Gag cleavage. In one of six participants (subtype CRF02_AG), we found 4-fold-lower LPV susceptibility in viral clones during failure of second-line treatment. A combination of four mutations (S126del, H127del, T122A, and G123E) in the p17 matrix of baseline virus generated a similar 4-fold decrease in susceptibility to LPV but not darunavir. These four amino acid changes were also able to confer LPV resistance to a subtype B Gag-protease backbone. Western blotting demonstrated significant Gag cleavage differences between sensitive and resistant isolates in the presence of drug. Resistant viruses had around 2-fold-lower infectivity than sensitive clones in the absence of drug. NGS combined with haplotype reconstruction revealed that resistant, less fit clones emerged from a minority population at baseline and thereafter persisted alongside sensitive fitter viruses. We used a multipronged genotypic and phenotypic approach to document emergence and temporal dynamics of a novel protease inhibitor resistance signature in HIV-1 matrix, revealing the interplay between Gag-associated resistance and fitness.

Baseline PI susceptibility by HIV-1 Gag-protease phenotyping and subsequent virological suppression with PI-based second-line ART in Nigeria

Objectives

Previous work showed that gag-protease-derived phenotypic susceptibility to PIs differed between HIV-1 subtype CRF02_AG/subtype G-infected patients who went on to successfully suppress viral replication versus those who experienced virological failure of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy as first-line treatment in a clinical trial. We analysed the relationship between PI susceptibility and outcome of second-line ART in Nigeria, where subtypes CRF02_AG/G dominate the epidemic.

Methods

Individuals who experienced second-line failure with ritonavir-boosted PI-based ART were matched (by subtype, sex, age, viral load, duration of treatment and baseline CD4 count) to those who achieved virological response (‘successes’). Successes were defined by viral load <400 copies of HIV-1 RNA/mL by week 48. Full-length Gag-protease was amplified from patient samples for in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing, with PI susceptibility expressed as IC₅₀ fold change (FC) relative to a subtype B reference strain.

Results

The median (IQR) lopinavir IC₅₀ FC was 4.04 (2.49–7.89) for virological failures and 4.13 (3.14–8.17) for virological successes (P = 0.94). One patient had an FC >10 for lopinavir at baseline and experienced subsequent virological failure with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir as the PI. There was no statistically significant difference in single-round replication efficiency between the two groups (P = 0.93). There was a moderate correlation between single-round replication efficiency and FC for lopinavir (correlation coefficient 0.32).

Conclusions

We found no impact of baseline HIV-1 Gag-protease-derived phenotypic susceptibility on outcomes of PI-based second-line ART in Nigeria.

HIV-1 protease, Gag and gp41 baseline substitutions associated with virological response to a PI-based regimen

OBJECTIVES

To assess, at ART initiation, the impact of baseline substitutions in protease, Gag and gp41 regions on the virological response to a first-line PI-based regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four HIV-infected ART-naive patients initiating a PI-based regimen including darunavir (n = 129) or atazanavir (n = 25) were assessed, including 36 experiencing virological failure (VF). Whole pol, gag and gp41 genes were sequenced at ART baseline by ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) using Illumina® technology. Supervised data-mining analyses were performed to identify mutations associated with virological response. Structural analyses were performed to assess the impact of mutations on protease conformation.

RESULTS

UDS was successful in 127, 138 and 134 samples for protease, Gag and gp41, respectively (31% subtype B and 38% CRF02_AG). Overall, T4A and S37T mutations in protease were identified as being associated with VF (P = 0.02 and P = 0.005, respectively). Among CRF02_AG sequences, I72M and E21D mutations were associated with VF (P = 0.03 for both). They all induced some conformational changes of some protease side-chain residues located near mutated residues. In Gag, mutations associated with VF were G62D, N315H and Y441S (P = 0.005, P = 0.007 and P = 0.0003, respectively). All were localized outside Gag cleavage sites (G62D, matrix; N315H, capsid; and Y441S, p1). In gp41, the I270T mutation, localized in the cytoplasmic tail, was associated with VF (P = 0.003), and the I4L mutation, in the fusion peptide, was associated with virological success (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, new baseline substitutions in Gag, protease and g41, potentially impacting PI-based regimen outcome, were evidenced. Phenotypic analyses are required to confirm their role in the PI-resistance mechanism.

Evolution of Protease Inhibitor Resistance in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Patients Failing Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy as Second-line Therapy in Low-income Countries: An Observational Analysis Within the EARNEST Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Limited viral load (VL) testing in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment programs in low-income countries often delays detection of treatment failure. The impact of remaining on failing protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimens is unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively tested VL in 2164 stored plasma samples from 386 patients randomized to receive lopinavir monotherapy (after initial raltegravir induction) in the Europe-Africa Research Network for Evaluation of Second-line Therapy (EARNEST) trial. Protease genotypic resistance testing was performed when VL >1000 copies/mL. We assessed evolution of PI resistance mutations from virological failure (confirmed VL >1000 copies/mL) until PI monotherapy discontinuation and examined associations using mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Median post-failure follow-up (in 118 patients) was 68 (interquartile range, 48-88) weeks. At failure, 20% had intermediate/high-level resistance to lopinavir. At 40-48 weeks post-failure, 68% and 51% had intermediate/high-level resistance to lopinavir and atazanavir; 17% had intermediate-level resistance (none high) to darunavir. Common PI mutations were M46I, I54V, and V82A. On average, 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.5-2.0) PI mutations developed per year; increasing after the first mutation; decreasing with subsequent mutations (P < .0001). VL changes were modest, mainly driven by nonadherence (P = .006) and PI mutation development (P = .0002); I47A was associated with a larger increase in VL than other mutations (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients develop intermediate/high-level lopinavir resistance within 1 year of ongoing viral replication on monotherapy but retain susceptibility to darunavir. Viral load increased slowly after failure, driven by non-adherence and PI mutation development.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00988039.

Pretreatment HIV drug resistance in low- and middle-income countries

Pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) has been increasing with scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries. Delay in responding to rising levels of PDR is projected to fuel a worldwide increase in mortality, HIV incidence and ART costs. Strategies to curb the rise in PDR include using antiretrovirals (ARVs) with high-genetic barrier to resistance in first-line therapy and for prophylaxis in HIV exposed infants, enhancing HIV drug resistance surveillance in populations initiating, receiving ART, and in those on pre-exposure prophylaxis, universal access and effective use of viral-load tests, improving adherence and retention and minimizing ART programmatic quality gaps. In this review, we assess the drivers of PDR, and potential strategies to mitigate its rise in prevalence and impact in low- and middle-income countries.

HIV-1 second-line failure and drug resistance at high-level and low-level viremia in Western Kenya

OBJECTIVE

Characterize failure and resistance above and below guidelines-recommended 1000 copies/ml virologic threshold, upon second-line failure.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Kenyan adults on lopinavir/ritonavir-based second-line were enrolled at AMPATH (Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare). Charts were reviewed for demographic/clinical characteristics and CD4/viral load were obtained. Participants with detectable viral load had a second visit and pol genotyping was attempted in both visits. Accumulated resistance was defined as mutations in the second, not the first visit. Low-level viremia (LLV) was detectable viral load less than 1000 copies/ml. Failure and resistance associations were evaluated using logistic and Poisson regression, Fisher Exact and t-tests.

RESULTS

Of 394 participants (median age 42, 60% women, median 1.9 years on second-line) 48% had detectable viral load; 21% had viral load more than 1000 copies/ml, associated with younger age, tuberculosis treatment, shorter time on second-line, lower CD4count/percentage, longer first-line treatment interruption and pregnancy. In 105 sequences from the first visit (35 with LLV), 79% had resistance (57% dual-class, 7% triple-class; 46% with intermediate-to-high-level resistance to ≥1 future drug option). LLV was associated with more overall and NRTI-associated mutations and with predicted resistance to more next-regimen drugs. In 48 second-visit sequences (after median 55 days; IQR 28-33), 40% accumulated resistance and LLV was associated with more mutation accumulation.

CONCLUSION

High resistance upon second-line failure exists at levels above and below guideline-recommended virologic-failure threshold, impacting future treatment options. Optimization of care should include increased viral load monitoring, resistance testing and third-line ART access, and consideration of lowering the virologic failure threshold, though this demands further investigation.

Gp41 and Gag amino acids linked to HIV-1 protease inhibitor-based second-line failure in HIV-1 subtype A from Western Kenya

Introduction

Failure of protease‐inhibitor (PI)‐based second‐line antiretroviral therapy (ART) with medication adherence but no protease drug resistance mutations (DRMs) is not well understood. This study investigated the involvement of gp41 and gag as alternative mechanisms, not captured by conventional resistance testing and particularly relevant in resource‐limited settings where third‐line ART is limited.

Methods

We evaluated gp41 and gag for unique amino acids in seven subtype A infected Kenyans failing second‐line therapy with no PI resistance yet detectable lopinavir (query dataset), compared to seven similar‐setting patients with PI resistance or undetectable lopinavir and 69 publically available subtype A Kenyan whole‐genomes sequences.

Results

Three gp41 (607T, 641L, 721I) and four gag (124S, 143V, 339P, 357S) amino acids were significantly more frequent in the query dataset compared to the other datasets, with significantly high co‐occurrence.

Conclusion

The genotypic analysis of a unique group of HIV‐1 subtype A infected patients, identified seven amino acids that could potentially contribute to a multi‐gene mechanism of PI‐based ART failure in the absence of PI DR mutations.