Subdural hematoma in glutaric aciduria type 1: High excreters are prone to incidental SDH despite newborn screening

Acute presentation of abusive head trauma

Child abuse is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The leading cause of child physical abuse related deaths is abusive head trauma, formerly known as shaken baby syndrome, making the rapid identification and assessment of these children critical. The clinical presentation of cases of abusive head trauma ranges from neurological complaints, such as seizures, to vague or subtle symptoms, such as vomiting. This results in frequent missed diagnoses of abusive head trauma. The identification of abusive head trauma relies on a thorough medical history and physical examination, followed by lab evaluation and imaging. The goal of the evaluation is to discover further injury and identify possible underlying non-traumatic etiologies of the patient's symptoms. In this article we present a framework for the assessment of abusive head trauma and provide information on common presentations and injuries, as well as differential diagnoses. A strong foundational knowledge of abusive head trauma will lead to greater recognition and improved safety planning for victims of this unfortunate diagnosis.

Biochemical and molecular features of chinese patients with glutaric acidemia type 1 from Fujian Province, southeastern China

BACKGROUND

Glutaric acidemia type 1 (GA1) is a rare autosomal recessive inherited metabolic disorder caused by variants in the gene encoding the enzyme glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (GCDH). The estimated prevalence of GA1 and the mutational spectrum of the GCDH gene vary widely according to race and region. The aim of this study was to assess the acylcarnitine profiles and genetic characteristics of patients with GA1 in Fujian Province, southeastern China.

RESULTS

From January 2014 to December 2022, a total of 1,151,069 newborns (631,016 males and 520,053 females) were screened using MS/MS in six newborn screening (NBS) centers in Fujian Province and recruited for this study. Through NBS, 18 newborns (13 females and 5 males) were diagnosed with GA1. Thus, the estimated incidence of GA1 was 1 in 63,948 newborns in Fujian province. In addition, 17 patients with GA1 were recruited after clinical diagnosis. All but one patient with GA1 had a remarkable increase in glutarylcarnitine (C5DC) concentrations. The results of urinary organic acid analyses in 33 patients showed that the concentration of glutaric acid (GA) increased in all patients. The levels of C5DC and GA in patients identified via NBS were higher than those in patients identified via clinical diagnosis (P < 0.05). A total of 71 variants of 70 alleles were detected in patients with GA1, with 19 different pathogenic variants identified. The three most prevalent variants represented 73.23% of the total and were c.1244-2 A > C, p.(?) (63.38%), c.1261G > A, p.Ala421Thr (5.63%), and c.406G > T, p.Gly136Cys (4.22%). The most abundant genotype observed was c.[1244-2 A > C]; [1244-2 A > C] (18/35, 52.43%) and its phenotype corresponded to high excretors (HE, GA > 100 mmol/mol Cr).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we investigated the biochemical and molecular features of 35 unrelated patients with GA1. C5DC concentrations in dried blood spots and urinary GA are effective indicators for a GA1 diagnosis. Our study also identified a GCDH variant spectrum in patients with GA1 from Fujian Province, southeastern China. Correlation analysis between genotypes and phenotypes provides preliminary and valuable information for genetic counseling and management.

How guideline development has informed clinical research for organic acidurias (et vice versa)

Organic acidurias, such as glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1), methylmalonic (MMA), and propionic aciduria (PA) are a prominent group of inherited metabolic diseases involving accumulation of eponymous metabolites causing endogenous intoxication. For all three conditions, guidelines for diagnosis and management have been developed and revised over the last years, resulting in three revisions for GA1 and one revision for MMA/PA. The process of clinical guideline development in rare metabolic disorders is challenged by the scarcity and limited quality of evidence available. The body of literature is often fragmentary and where information is present, it is usually derived from small sample sizes. Therefore, the development of guidelines for GA1 and MMA/PA was initially confronted with a poor evidence foundation that hindered formulation of concrete recommendations in certain contexts, triggering specific research projects and initiation of longitudinal, prospective observational studies using patient registries. Reversely, these observational studies contributed to evaluate the value of newborn screening, phenotypic diversities, and treatment effects, thus significantly improving the quality of evidence and directly influencing formulation and evidence levels of guideline recommendations. Here, we present insights into interactions between guideline development and (pre)clinical research for GA1 and MMA/PA, and demonstrate how guidelines gradually improved from revision to revision. We describe how clinical studies help to unravel the relative impact of therapeutic interventions on outcome and conclude that despite new and better quality of research data over the last decades, significant shortcomings of evidence regarding prognosis and treatment remain. It appears that development of clinical guidelines can directly help to guide research, and vice versa.

Recommendations for diagnosing and managing individuals with glutaric aciduria type 1: Third revision

Glutaric aciduria type 1 is a rare inherited neurometabolic disorder of lysine metabolism caused by pathogenic gene variations in GCDH (cytogenic location: 19p13.13), resulting in deficiency of mitochondrial glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (GCDH) and, consequently, accumulation of glutaric acid, 3-hydroxyglutaric acid, glutaconic acid and glutarylcarnitine detectable by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (organic acids) and tandem mass spectrometry (acylcarnitines). Depending on residual GCDH activity, biochemical high and low excreting phenotypes have been defined. Most untreated individuals present with acute onset of striatal damage before age 3 (to 6) years, precipitated by infectious diseases, fever or surgery, resulting in irreversible, mostly dystonic movement disorder with limited life expectancy. In some patients, striatal damage develops insidiously. In recent years, the clinical phenotype has been extended by the finding of extrastriatal abnormalities and cognitive dysfunction, preferably in the high excreter group, as well as chronic kidney failure. Newborn screening is the prerequisite for pre-symptomatic start of metabolic treatment with low lysine diet, carnitine supplementation and intensified emergency treatment during catabolic episodes, which, in combination, have substantially improved neurologic outcome. In contrast, start of treatment after onset of symptoms cannot reverse existing motor dysfunction caused by striatal damage. Dietary treatment can be relaxed after the vulnerable period for striatal damage, that is, age 6 years. However, impact of dietary relaxation on long-term outcomes is still unclear. This third revision of evidence-based recommendations aims to re-evaluate previous recommendations (Boy et al., J Inherit Metab Dis, 2017;40(1):75-101; Kolker et al., J Inherit Metab Dis 2011;34(3):677-694; Kolker et al., J Inherit Metab Dis, 2007;30(1):5-22) and to implement new research findings on the evolving phenotypic diversity as well as the impact of non-interventional variables and treatment quality on clinical outcomes.

Rare Disease Registries Are Key to Evidence-Based Personalized Medicine: Highlighting the European Experience

Rare diseases, such as inherited metabolic diseases, have been identified as a health priority within the European Union more than 20 years ago and have become an integral part of EU health programs and European Reference Networks. Having the potential to pool data, to achieve sufficient sample size, to overcome the knowledge gap on rare diseases and to foster epidemiological and clinical research, patient registries are recognized as key instruments to evidence-based medicine for individuals with rare diseases. Patient registries can be used for multiple purposes, such as (1) describing the natural history and phenotypic diversity of rare diseases, (2) improving case definition and indication to treat, (3) identifying strategies for risk stratification and early prediction of disease severity (4), evaluating the impact of preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies on individual health, health economics, and the society, and (5) informing guideline development and policy makers. In contrast to clinical trials, patient registries aim to gather real-world evidence and to achieve generalizable results based on patient cohorts with a broad phenotypic spectrum. In order to develop a consistent and sustained framework for rare disease registries, uniform core principles have been formulated and have been formalized through the European Rare Disease Registration Infrastructure. Adherence to these core principles and compliance with the European general data protection regulations ensures that data collected and stored in patient registries can be exchanged and pooled in a protected environment. To illustrate the benefits and limitations of patient registries on rare disease research this review focuses on inherited metabolic diseases.