The interactions between chiral analytes and chitosan-based chiral stationary phases during enantioseparation

The goal of the present study was to disclose the interactions between chitosan-type chiral selectors (CSs) and chiral analytes during enantioseparation. Hence, six chitosan 3,6-bis(phenylcarbamate)-2-(cyclohexylmethylurea)s were synthesized and characterized. These chitosan derivatives were employed as CSs with which the corresponding coated-type chiral stationary phases (CSPs) were prepared. According to the nature and position of the substituents on the phenyl group, the CSs and CSPs were divided into three sets. The counterparts of the three sets were 3,5-diMe versus 3,5-diCl, 4-Me versus 4-Cl and 3-Me versus 3-Cl. The enantioseparation capability of the CSPs was evaluated with high-performance liquid chromatography. The CSPs demonstrated a good enantioseparation capability to the tested chiral analytes. In enantioselectivity, the CSs with 3,5-diCl and with 4-Me roughly were better than the counterparts with 3,5-diMe and with 4-Cl respectively. The CS with 3-Me enantiomerically recognized more analytes than the one with 3-Cl, but showed lower separation factors in more enantioseparations. The acidity of the amide hydrogen in the phenylcarbamates was investigated with density functional theory calculations and ¹H NMR measurements. The trend of the acidity variation with different substituents on the phenyl group was confirmed by the retention factors of acetone on the CSPs. Compared the retention factors of analytes on every set of the counterparts, the formation of hydrogen bond (HB) in enantioseparation could be outlined as follows: when the CSs interacted with chiral analytes without reactive hydrogen but with lone paired electrons, the carbamate N‒Hs in the CSs were HB donors and the analytes were HB acceptors; if the CSs interacted with analytes with a reactive hydrogen, the role of the CSs in HB formation was related to the acidity of the reactive hydrogen; the patterns of HB formation between the CSs and analytes were also impacted by compositions of mobile phases, in addition to the nature, number and position of substituents on the phenyl group. Based on the discussion, chiral recognition mechanism could be understood in more detail. Besides, the strategy to improve enantioseparation capability of a CSP by introducing a substituent onto phenyl group was clarified and further comprehended.

Comparison in enantioseparation performance of chiral stationary phases prepared from chitosans of different sources and molecular weights

The aim of the present study was to compare the enantioseparation performance of chiral stationary phases (CSPs) which were derived from chitosans of different sources and molecular weights. Therefore, chitosans of shrimp and crab shells were prepared. The viscosity-average molecular weights of the chitosans both prepared from shrimp and crab shells were 2.8 × 10⁵ and 1.4 × 10⁵. The chitosans were isobutyrylated yielding isopropylcarbonyl chitosans which were then derivatized with 4-methylphenyl isocyanate to provide chitosan 3,6-bis(4-methylphenylcarbamate)-2-(isobutyrylamide)s. The chitosan 3,6-bis(4-methylphenylcarbamate)-2-(isobutyrylamide)s were used as chiral selectors (CSs) with which the corresponding CSPs were prepared. With the same chiral analytes and under the same mobile phase conditions, the enantioseparation capability of the CSPs was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography. In two CSs prepared from the same source, the one with higher molecular weight showed better enantioseparation capability; in two CSs prepared with the chitosans of the same molecular weight, the one derived from shrimp shell exhibited better performance. With regard to the two shrimp chitosan CSs, most of chiral analytes interacted more strongly with the one with lower molecular weight, and an opposite trend was found for the two crab chitosan CSs. Based on the results observed in the present study and in previous work, we believe that the influence of molecular weight on CSP enantioseparation performance is related to the substituent introduced in the CS molecule.

Chiral recognition by enantioselective liquid chromatography: mechanisms and modern chiral stationary phases

An overview of the state-of-the-art in LC enantiomer separation is presented. This tutorial review is mainly focused on mechanisms of chiral recognition and enantiomer distinction of popular chiral selectors and corresponding chiral stationary phases including discussions of thermodynamics, additivity principle of binding increments, site-selective thermodynamics, extrathermodynamic approaches, methods employed for the investigation of dominating intermolecular interactions and complex structures such as spectroscopic methods (IR, NMR), X-ray diffraction and computational methods. Modern chiral stationary phases are discussed with particular focus on those that are commercially available and broadly used. It is attempted to provide the reader with vivid images of molecular recognition mechanisms of selected chiral selector-selectand pairs on basis of solid-state X-ray crystal structures and simulated computer models, respectively. Such snapshot images illustrated in this communication unfortunately cannot account for the molecular dynamics of the real world, but are supposed to be helpful for the understanding. The exploding number of papers about applications of various chiral stationary phases in numerous fields of enantiomer separations is not covered systematically.

Comparative enantioseparation of seven triazole fungicides on (S,S)-Whelk O1 and four different cellulose derivative columns

The comparative enantioseparation of seven chiral triazole fungicides on a Pirkle type (S,S)-Whelk O1 chiral column and four different cellulose derivative columns, namely cellulose tribenzoate (CTB), cellulose tris(4-methylbenzoate) (CTMB), cellulose triphenylcarbamate (CTPC), and cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenyl carbamate) (CDMPC), in normal phase mode is described. The seven triazole fungicides investigated were tebuconazole, hexaconazole, myclobutanil, diniconazole, uniconazole, paclobutrazol, and triadimenol. The chiral separation of each solute was investigated with ethanol, n-propanol, iso-propanol, and n-butanol, respectively, as polar modifier in the hexane mobile phase. The results revealed that (S,S)-Whelk O1 was less than universal and only hexaconazole and triadimenol underwent enantioseparation. Among the self-prepared cellulose derivative columns used, the enantiomeric resolution capacities for the studied analytes generally decreased in the order CDMPC > CTPC > CTMB > CTB. The best enantioseparation of the analytes was mostly obtained on CDMPC and none of them were enantioseparated on CTB. The chiral recognition mechanisms between the analytes and the chiral selectors are discussed.

Covalently bonded polysaccharide derivatives as chiral stationary phases in high-performance liquid chromatography

Polysaccharide derivatives have been extensively used as chromatographic chiral selectors in chiral stationary phases (CSPs) for the separation of enantiomers by HPLC. When coated onto a silica matrix, they represent nowadays one of the most popular type of CSPs. However, they are only compatible with a limited choice of solvents. The main drawback of these CSPs is related to the solubility of the chiral selector in a number of solvents, which limits their applicability. The different attempts which have been described up to now to overcome this problem by covalently fixing the chiral selector to a matrix are reviewed in this paper.

Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation of enantiomers on polysaccharide type chiral stationary phases

The direct chiral separation by chiral stationary phases (CSPs) is one of the most important techniques to analyze enantiomeric purity as well as to get enantiomerically pure material quickly. Among various types of CSPs, polysaccharide type CSPs are well known by their versatility and durability. They are not only effective under normal-phase conditions, but also under reversed-phase conditions. In order to get a good separation under the reversed-phase conditions, it is the key to choose an appropriate mobile phase. For example, a simple mixture of water/acetonitrile or water/methanol are sufficient for a neutral analyte, while it is necessary to use an acidic solution instead of water for an acidic analyte and a solution of a chaotropic salt (or a basic solution) for a basic analyte, respectively. The paper also presents lists of more than 350 separation examples that include 22 validated methods for drug analyses from serum, plasma, or urine samples on polysaccharide type CSPs under reversed-phase conditions.

Preparative chromatographic separation of enantiomers

The potential of the chromatographic separation of enantiomers on a preparative scale as a tool for the isolation of optically pure compounds is gaining increasing recognition. This review surveys the different chiral stationary phases (CSPs) used for preparative chromatography, emphasizing the advantages and drawbacks of each. The strategy to be followed for preparative separations is discussed and tables summarizing separations reported in the literature give an overview of practical applications. Cellulose triacetate has been used most frequently, probably because of its broad application range and its low production costs in comparison with more recently introduced CSPs. Nevertheless, the high efficiency of some of the novel CSPs is likely to contribute to the further development and expansion of the method.