Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver: comparison between Gd-BOPTA and Mangafodipir

Metal-Based Complexes as Pharmaceuticals for Molecular Imaging of the Liver

This article reviews the use of metal complexes as contrast agents (CA) and radiopharmaceuticals for the anatomical and functional imaging of the liver. The main focus was on two established imaging modalities: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine, the latter including scintigraphy and positron emission tomography (PET). The review provides an overview on approved pharmaceuticals like Gd-based CA and ^99mTc-based radiometal complexes, and also on novel agents such as ⁶⁸Ga-based PET tracers. Metal complexes are presented by their imaging modality, with subsections focusing on their structure and mode of action. Uptake mechanisms, metabolism, and specificity are presented, in context with advantages and limitations of the diagnostic application and taking into account the respective imaging technique.

Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Overview and Central Nervous System Applications With a Focus on Neurodegeneration

Manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) rose to prominence in the 1990s as a sensitive approach to high contrast imaging. Following the discovery of manganese conductance through calcium-permeable channels, MEMRI applications expanded to include functional imaging in the central nervous system (CNS) and other body systems. MEMRI has since been employed in the investigation of physiology in many animal models and in humans. Here, we review historical perspectives that follow the evolution of applied MRI research into MEMRI with particular focus on its potential toxicity. Furthermore, we discuss the more current in vivo investigative uses of MEMRI in CNS investigations and the brief but decorated clinical usage of chelated manganese compound mangafodipir in humans.

Optimized high-resolution contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary imaging at 3 tesla: a cross-over comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid

PURPOSE

To evaluate the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) performance of 0.05 mmol/kg gadoxetic acid and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine for dynamic and hepatobiliary phase imaging. In addition, flip angles (FA) that maximize relative contrast-to-noise performance for hepatobiliary phase imaging were determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-over study in 10 volunteers was performed using each agent. Imaging was performed at 3 Tesla (T) with a 32-channel phased-array coil using breathheld 3D spoiled gradient echo sequences for SNR and CNR analysis, and for FA optimization of hepatobiliary phase imaging.

RESULTS

Gadobenate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg) had superior SNR performance during the dynamic phase, statistically significant for portal vein and hepatic vein in the portal venous and venous phase (for all, P < 0.05) despite twice the approved dose of gadoxetic acid (0.05 mmol/kg), while gadoxetic acid had superior SNR performance during the hepatobiliary phase. Optimal FAs for hepatobiliary phase imaging using gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine were 25-30° and 20-30° for relative contrast liver versus muscle (surrogate for nonhepatocellular tissues), and 45° and 20° (relative contrast liver versus biliary structures), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gadobenate dimeglumine may be preferable for applications that require dynamic phase imaging only, while gadoxetic acid may be preferable when the hepatobiliary phase is clinically important. Hepatobiliary phase imaging with both agents benefits from flip angle optimization.

Enhancement of liver parenchyma after injection of hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast media: a comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine

PURPOSE

To compare enhancement of liver parenchyma in MR imaging after injection of hepatocyte-specific contrast media.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 295) with known/suspected focal liver lesions randomly received 0.025 mmol gadoxetic acid/kg body weight or 0.05 mmol gadobenate dimeglumine/kg body weight by means of bolus injection. MR imaging was performed before and immediately after injection, and in the delayed phase at approved time points (20 min after injection of gadoxetic acid and 40 min after injection of gadobenate dimeglumine). The relative liver enhancement for the overall population and a cirrhotic subgroup was compared in T1-weighted GRE sequences. An independent radiologist performed signal intensity measurements. Enhancement ratios were compared using confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The relative liver enhancement in the overall population was superior with gadoxetic acid (57.24%) versus gadobenate dimeglumine (32.77%) in the delayed-imaging phase. The enhancement ratio between the contrast media was statistically significant at 1.75 (95% CI: 1.46-2.13). In the delayed phase, the enhancement of cirrhotic liver with gadoxetic acid (57.00%) was comparable to that in the overall population. Enhancement with gadobenate dimeglumine was inferior in cirrhotic liver parenchyma (26.85%).

CONCLUSION

In the delayed, hepatocyte-specific phase, liver enhancement after injection of gadoxetic acid was superior to that obtained with gadobenate dimeglumine.

Evaluation of a Novel Time-Efficient Protocol for Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions in the unenhanced and already pre-enhanced liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were evaluated prospectively. Unenhanced T1-weighted gradient echo (T1wGRE) and T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2wTSE) images were acquired followed by contrast-enhanced T1wGRE images during the dynamic, equilibrium, and delayed phases after the bolus injection of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. An identical series of dynamic images was then acquired after the delayed scan following a second 0.05 mmol/kg bolus of gadobenate dimeglumine. Images were evaluated randomly in 2 sessions by 3 independent blinded readers. Evaluated images in the first session comprised the unenhanced images, the first or second set of dynamic images, and the delayed images. The second session included the unenhanced images, the dynamic images not yet evaluated in the first session, and the delayed images. The 2 reading sessions were compared for lesion characterization and diagnosis, and kappa (kappa) values for interobserver agreement were determined. Quantitative evaluation of lesion contrast enhancement was also performed.

RESULTS

The enhancement behavior in the second dynamic series was similar to that in the first series, although pre-enhancement of the normal liver resulted in reduced lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratios and the visualization of some lesions only on arterial phase images. Typical imaging features for the lesions included in the study were visualized clearly in both series. Strong agreement (kappa=0.56-0.89; all evaluations) between the 2 images sets was noted by all readers for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions and for definition of specific diagnosis, and between readers for diagnoses established based on images acquired in the unenhanced and pre-enhanced liver.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic imaging in the hepatobiliary phase gives similar information as dynamic imaging of the unenhanced liver. This might prove advantageous for screening protocols involving same session imaging of primary extrahepatic tumors and liver.

Comparison of mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for detection and characterization of hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the validity of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced versus ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI in the detection and characterization of hepatic lesions in colorectal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients who were known to have or suspected of having hepatic metastasis from colorectal carcinoma underwent mangafodipir trisodium- or ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI in block randomization methods. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MR images to determine the number of hepatic lesions and to characterize the lesions as malignant or benign. Each lesion was assessed according to its size (small, <or= 2 cm; large, > 2 cm in diameter) on both mangafodipir trisodium- or ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI. The data were correlated with the reference diagnosis: histopathology and intraoperative sonography (n = 16); intraoperative sonography (n = 4); and imaging and clinical diagnosis with follow-up (> 3 months; n = 21). The detection rates and diagnostic accuracies of hepatic lesions on both sets of MR images were assessed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Eighty-two hepatic lesions (53 metastatic and 29 benign) were identified in 41 patients. No significant differences were seen between mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for detecting all hepatic lesions (p = 0.183), small hepatic lesions (p = 0.299), all metastases (p = 0.695), and small metastases (p = 0.689). The diagnostic accuracies of mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI showed no significant differences in all hepatic lesions (p = 0.624) and small hepatic lesions (p = 0.641).

CONCLUSION

Mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI are similar in hepatic lesion detection and characterization in colorectal cancer patients.

Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver

Imaging of the liver is performed most often to detect and characterize focal liver lesions. MR imaging has been the method of choice to assess focal liver lesions accurately. Nonspecific intravenous contrast agents have been used for routine abdominal MR imaging protocols including liver imaging. Over the last 10 to 15 years new contrast agents have been developed that combine the excellent contrast resolution of MR imaging with improved tissue specificity. This article reviews various contrast agents that are in clinical use for liver MR imaging and discusses their potential clinical role.

MRT der Leber

The liver is a common site for various benign and malignant focal lesions. The initial modality for assessing liver lesions is ultrasound or CT. MRI with its superior soft tissue contrast offers multiple advantages over other imaging modalities. Contrast agents have been developed that increase the detection rate and provide more specific information in comparison to unenhanced techniques. In the mean time three classes are available for MR imaging of the liver: extracellular gadolinium chelates, hepatobiliary and reticulo-endothelia, superparamagnetic agents. We describe in this review the most common focal lesions, their diagnostic possibilities, and the imaging protocols. Clinical use of these contrast agents facilitates detection and differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions that may help to avoid invasive procedures such as biopsy for lesion characterization.

Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications

Hepatobiliary contrast agents with uptake into hepatocytes followed by variable biliary excretion represent a unique class of cell-specific MR contrast agents. Two hepatobiliary contrast agents, mangafodipir trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine, are already clinically approved. A third hepatobiliary contrast agent, Gd-EOB-DTPA, is under consideration. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview on the properties, clinical development and application of these three hepatobiliary contrast agents. Bolus injectable paramagnetic hepatobiliary contrast agents combine established features of extracellular agents with the advantages of hepatocyte specificity. The detection and characterisation of focal liver disease appears to be improved compared to unenhanced MRI, MRI with unspecific contrast agents and contrast-enhanced CT. To decrease the total time spent by a patient in the MR scanner, it is advisable to administer the agent immediately after acquisition of unenhanced T1-w MRI. After infusion or bolus injection (with dynamic FS-T1-w 2D or 3D GRE) of the contrast agent, moderately and heavily T2w images are acquired. Post-contrast T1-w MRI is started upon completion of T2-w MRI for mangafodipir trisodium and Gd-EOB-DTPA as early as 20 min following injection, while gadobenate dimeglumine scans are obtained >60 min following injection. Post-contrast acquisition techniques with near isotropic 3D pulse sequences with fat saturation parallel the technical progress made by MSCT combined with an unparalleled improvement in tumour-liver contrast. The individual decision that hepatobiliary contrast agent one uses is partly based on personal preferences. No comparative studies have been conducted comparing the advantages or disadvantages of all three agents directly against each other.

Detection of liver metastases: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging examinations

PURPOSE

To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging for detection of liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients known to have malignancy and suspected of having focal liver lesions at ultrasonography (US) underwent 1.0-T MR imaging with gradient-recalled-echo T1-weighted breath-hold sequences before, immediately after, and 60 minutes after Gd-BOPTA injection. Subsequently, MR imaging was performed with turbo spin-echo short inversion time inversion-recovery T2-weighted sequences before and 60 minutes after ferumoxides administration. All patients subsequently underwent intraoperative US within 15 days, and histopathologic analysis of their resected lesion-containing specimens was performed. Separate qualitative analyses were performed to assess lesion detection with each contrast agent. Quantitative analyses were performed by measuring signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) on pre- and postcontrast Gd-BOPTA and ferumoxides MR images. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank and Monte Carlo tests.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging was superior to that of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection (P <.05). Ferumoxides MR images depicted 36 (97%) of 37 metastases detected at intraoperative US, whereas Gd-BOPTA MR images depicted 30 (81%) metastases during delayed phase and 20 (54%) during dynamic phase. All six metastases identified only at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging were 5-10 mm in diameter. There was a significant increase in CNR between the lesion and liver before and after ferumoxides administration (from 3.8 to 6.8, P <.001) but not before or after Gd-BOPTA injection (from -4.8 to -5.5, P >.05).

CONCLUSION

Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging seems to be superior to Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection.

MR contrast agents in hepatic cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis

Chronic liver disease alters the gross architecture of the liver and its arterial and portal blood supply. The relative proportion of regenerative hepatocytes, necrosis, extracellular interstitial space, and fibrosis is responsible for liver enhancement after the administration of a contrast agent. Because contrast agents can be directed toward either the extracellular or the intracellular spaces, knowledge of the different parenchymal enhancement alterations seen after the administration of these agents is necessary to understand how chronic liver disease pathologic changes influence contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images. This article reviews the effect of chronic liver disease on MR contrast enhancement, as well as the effect of altered enhancement on lesion detection and characterization. Both extracellular and intracellular contrast agents are considered.

Safety of approved MR contrast media for intravenous injection

In the last 10 years, the use of intravenous contrast media in magnetic resonance (MR) has become well-established clinical practice. Contrast media provide critical additional diagnostic information in many instances. The gadolinium chelates constitute the largest group of MR contrast media and are considered to be very safe. These agents are thought to be safer than nonionic iodinated contrast agents. Unlike x-ray agents, the gadolinium chelates are not nephrotoxic. Minor adverse reactions, including nausea (1%-2% for all agents) and hives (<1% for all agents), occur in a very low percent of cases. Health care personnel should be aware of the (extremely uncommon) potential for severe anaphylactoid reactions in association with the use of MR contrast media and be prepared should complications arise. The four gadolinium chelates currently available worldwide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadoteridol, gadodiamide, and gadoterate meglumine, cannot be differentiated on the basis of adverse reactions. Far fewer patients have been examined to date with the two other agents that have widespread approval, mangafodipir trisodium and ferumoxides. These latter two agents are considered to be very safe but have a higher percentage of associated adverse reactions (7%-17% with mangafodipir trisodium and 15% with ferumoxides). This review discusses the safety issues involved with administration of intravenous contrast media in MR imaging, focusing on the six agents (four gadolinium chelates, one manganese chelate, and the last a large iron particle) with widespread use world-wide.

Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging--a multicenter phase III clinical study

PURPOSE

To evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for dynamic and delayed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of focal liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 126 of 214 patients, MR imaging was performed before Gd-BOPTA administration, immediately after bolus administration of a 0.05- mmol/kg dose of Gd-BOPTA, and 60-120 minutes after an additional intravenously infused 0.05-mmol/kg dose. In 88 patients, imaging was performed before and 60-120 minutes after a single, intravenously infused 0.1-mmol/kg dose. T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo and T1-weighted gradient-echo images were acquired. On-site and blinded off-site reviewers prospectively evaluated all images. Intraoperative ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) during arterial portography, and/or CT with iodized oil served as the reference methods in 110 patients.

RESULTS

Significantly more lesions were detected on combined pre- and postcontrast images compared with on precontrast images alone (P <. 01). All reviewers reported a decreased mean size of the smallest detected lesion and improved lesion conspicuity on postcontrast images. All on-site reviewers and two off-site reviewers reported increased overall diagnostic confidence (P <.01). Additional lesion characterization information was provided on up to 109 (59%) of 184 delayed images and for up to 50 (42%) of 118 patients in whom dynamic images were assessed. Gd-BOPTA would have helped change the diagnosis in 99 (47%) of 209 cases and affected patient treatment in 408 (23%) of 209 cases.

CONCLUSION

Gd-BOPTA increases liver lesion conspicuity and detectability and aids in the characterization of lesions.

A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA

PURPOSE

Two gadolinium chelates with partial hepatobiliary excretion, Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA, and one gadolinium chelate with exclusively renal excretion, Gd-HP-DO3A, were compared on MRI at 1.5 T. The time course of enhancement for normal liver, gallbladder, spleen, kidney, and muscle was specifically examined in the rhesus monkey.

METHOD

Four animals were evaluated with each agent for a total of 12 MR studies. Breath-hold and non-breath-hold T1 weighted scans were acquired prior to and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min after intravenous contrast medium injection. The same contrast dose, 0.1 mmol/kg, was used for all studies. Images were analyzed by region-of interest measurements.

RESULTS

Both hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates achieved sustained enhancement of normal liver parenchyma, superior in magnitude to that following Gd-HP-DO3A injection. On sans 45-90 min following injection, liver enhancement with Gd-BOPTA was superior to that with Gd-EOB-DTPA. This difference was, however, not statistically significant. Liver enhancement decreased more rapidly on delayed scans with Gd-EOB-DTPA than with Gd-Bopta, a result that was statistically significant. Excretion of contrast agent into the gallbladder was noted with both hepatobiliary agents but not with Gd-HP-DO3A.

CONCLUSION

Enhancement of normal liver parenchyma peaks at a later time after injection with Gd-BOPTA than with Gd-EOB-DTPA. However, the maximum percent enhancement is comparable when (as in the current evaluation) the two agents are compared at the same dose (0.1 mmol/kg). This finding supports the choice of optimal imaging time post contrast agent administration (for delayed scans) in clinical trials of 20-45 min post injection with Gd-EOB-DTPA and 60-120 min post injection with Gd-BOPTA.