Contrast-enhanced, K-space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta

Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis

Background and purpose

As a non-invasive, side effect-free and cost-effective method, ultrasonography represents the method of choice for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Four different criteria in total, including two direct criteria in peak systolic velocity (PSV) and renal aortic ratio (RAR) and two indirect criteria in resistance index (RI) and acceleration time (AT) for the measurement of relevant renal artery stenosis are described, each demonstrating highly variable accuracy in studies. Furthermore, there is controversy over the degree beyond which stenosis becomes therapeutically relevant and which ultrasound PSV is diagnostically relevant in terms of stenosis grading.

Material and methods

This article gives a critical review based on a selective literature search on measurement methodology and the validity of ultrasound in renal artery stenosis. A critical evaluation of methods and a presentation of measurement principles to establish the most precise measurement method possible compared with the gold standard angiography, as well as an evaluation of the importance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

Results and conclusions

The PSV provides high sensitivity and specificity as a direct measurement method in stenosis detection and grading. Most studies found sensitivities and specificities of 85–90 % for > 50 % stenosis at a PSV > 180–200 cm/s in ROC curve analysis. Other methods, such as the ratio of the PSV in the aorta to the PSV in the renal artery (RAR) or indirect criteria, such as side to side differences in RI (dRI) or AT can be additionally used to improve accuracy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves accuracy by means of echo contrast enhancement. Although in the past only high-grade stenosis was considered relevant for treatment, a drop in pressure of > 20 mmHg in > 50 % stenosis (PSV 180 cm/s) is classified as relevant for increased renin secretion. Stenosis in fibromuscular dysplasia can be reliably graded according to the continuity equation. Although the available studies on the grading of in-stent restenosis are the subject of controversy, there is a tendency to assume higher cut-off values for PSV and RAR. Whilst MRA and CTA demonstrate an accuracy of > 90 %, this is at the cost of possible side effects for patients, particularly in the case of pre-existing renal parenchymal damage.

Additional online material

This article includes two additional video sequences on visualizing renal artery stenosis. This supplemental material can be found under: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00772-015-0060-3

Role of multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of living kidney donors

Background

Kidney transplantation from living donors has been increased recently. Preoperative evaluation of living donor is important to select the appropriate kidney for transplantation and to decrease donor surgical complications.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the use of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to evaluate vascular anatomy in living kidney donors with traditional angiography.

Patients and Methods

A total number of 60 living kidney donors who underwent open surgical approach for transplantation were selected: Kidney anatomy of donors evaluated by CT angiography (group 1) or traditional angiographic examination (group 2). Renal vessels anatomy was compared with surgical findings in both groups.

Results

The accuracy for detecting number of main renal arteries were not different in both groups which were 96.7% in CT angiography group and 90% in traditional angiography group (P = 0.15). The accuracy for detection of main renal veins were 100% in group 1 and 96.7% in group 2 (P = 0.31).

Conclusions

MDCT has the same accuracy as traditional angiography to detect renal abnormalities in living kidney donors.

Direct comparison of sensitivity encoding (SENSE) accelerated and conventional 3D contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of renal arteries: effect of increasing spatial resolution

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of attaining higher spatial resolution in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of renal arteries using parallel imaging, sensitivity encoding (SENSE), by comparing the SENSE contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA against a conventional CE-MRA protocol with identical scan times, injection protocol, and other acquisition parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Numerical simulations and a direct comparison of SENSE-accelerated versus conventional acquisitions were performed. A total of 41 patients (18 male) were imaged using both protocols for a direct comparison. Both protocols used fluoroscopic triggering, centric encoding, breath-holding, equivalent injection protocol, and lasted approximately 30 seconds.

RESULTS

Simulated point-spread functions were narrower for the SENSE protocol compared to the conventional protocol. In the patient study, although the SENSE protocol produced images with lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), image quality was better for all segments of the renal arteries. In addition, ringing of kidney parenchyma and renal artery blurring were significantly reduced in the SENSE protocol. Finally, reader confidence improved with the SENSE protocol.

CONCLUSION

Despite a reduction in SNR, the higher-resolution SENSE CE-MRA provided improved image quality, reduced artifacts, and increased reader confidence compared to the conventional protocol.

Bolus shaping of contrast medium to adapt k-space sampling: adjusting injection protocol of magnetic resonance angiography for optimal images in a 3-T system

PURPOSE

To explore the possibility of shaping bolus of contrast medium to adapt k-space sampling to improve image quality in a 3-T system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty patients suspected of having renal arterial disease or atherosclerosis were divided into four groups and underwent imaging with different high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) scanning and injection protocol combinations. A group of 20 patients were injected single-dose contrast medium with a centric view ordering for k-space filling. Another group of 20 patients underwent MRA with double-dose and centric-view ordering. The bolus of contrast medium was shaped by adjusting injection protocol to adapt centric and sequential view ordering of sampling k-space, respectively, for other two groups. Then, the quality of image got with different protocols combination was compared, and the dose of contrast medium used in latter two groups was compared with single- and double-dose prescription basing on body weight.

RESULT

Bolus shaped adapting to centric view ordering and sequential view ordering brings more homogeneous vessel signal. Individualized dose is lower than the double dose but higher than the single dose. Dose does not necessarily correlate with body weight.

CONCLUSION

Under certain scanning protocol, appropriate shape of contrast medium passing through target vessel leads to higher-quality image and save contrast medium.

Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine diagnostic performance and safety of contrast material-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight gadobenate dimeglumine for depiction of significant steno-occlusive disease (> or =51% stenosis) of renal arteries, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter study was approved by local institutional review boards; all patients provided written informed consent. Patient enrollment and examination at centers in the United States complied with HIPAA. Two hundred ninety-three patients (154 men, 139 women; mean age, 61.0 years) with severe hypertension (82.2%), progressive renal failure (11.3%), and suspected renal artery stenosis (6.5%) underwent CE MR angiography with three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequences after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine at 2 mL/sec. Anteroposterior and oblique DSA was performed in 268 (91.5%) patients. Three independent blinded reviewers evaluated CE MR angiographic images. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE MR angiography for detection of significant steno-occlusive disease (> or =51% vessel lumen narrowing) were determined at segment (main renal artery) and patient levels. Positive and negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios were determined. Interobserver agreement was analyzed with generalized kappa statistics. A safety evaluation (clinical examination, electrocardiogram, blood and urine analysis, monitoring for adverse events) was performed.

RESULTS

Of 268 patients, 178 who were evaluated with MR angiography and DSA had significant steno-occlusive disease of renal arteries at DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE MR angiography for detection of 51% or greater stenosis or occlusion were 60.1%-84.1%, 89.4%-94.7%, and 80.4%-86.9%, respectively, at segment level. Similar values were obtained for predictive values and for patient-level analyses. Few CE MR angiographic examinations (1.9%-2.8%) were technically inadequate. Interobserver agreement for detection of significant steno-occlusive disease was good (79.9% agreement; kappa = 0.69). No safety concerns were noted.

CONCLUSION

CE MR angiography performed with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine, compared with DSA, is safe and provides good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of significant renal artery steno-occlusive disease.

Can magnetic resonance angiogram be a reliable alternative for donor evaluation for laparoscopic nephrectomy?

BACKGROUND

While hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HLDN) is less invasive, which can encourage kidney donation, it requires more exact information about the renal vascular anatomy because of its limited visual field during nephrectomy. MRA is also an attractive choice because of its minimal invasiveness; further, it is an outpatient-based procedure, it uses non-nephrotoxic contrast material and it has no radiation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of gadolinium enhanced three-dimensional MRA (GdE-3D MRA) in a group of potential live donors who were candidates for HLDN.

METHODS

From September 2002 to December 2004, 40 potential live renal donors were evaluated prospectively with GdE-3D MRA, and this imaging modality was performed before the gold standard, the intra-arterial digital subtraction angiogram (IA-DSA), was carried out. All the images were reviewed in a blinded manner by the attending vascular radiologist. The MRA findings were compared with the DSA findings and the surgical findings as the reference methods. We evaluated the accuracy of MRA for imaging the renal architectures, and especially for imaging the renal accessory arteries and the early branching arteries that are important determinants for selection of the donor kidney.

RESULTS

Both the MRA and DSA images showed consistent findings with the surgical findings in 92.5% of the 40 donors. There were no discrepant cases in depicting the main renal artery. MRA showed 100% specificity for imaging both the renal accessory arteries and the early branching arteries, when compared with the surgical findings. The kappa values for the MRA and DSA for the accessory arteries were all 0.66 compared with the intraoperative findings. MRA also depicted one huge renal cyst in one donor and many small renal cysts in the other donors that could not be imaged by DSA. There were no adverse events during the MRA procedure. None of the findings missed by MRA resulted in deleterious consequences at laparoscopic nephrectomy for the donor and graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Our limited experience with GdE-3D MRA for imaging the renal structures in kidney donor evaluation for HLDN has been quite satisfactory.

Utilizing SENSE to reduce scan duration in high-resolution contrast-enhanced renal MR angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of sensitivity encoding (SENSE) to reduce scan time and decrease detrimental artifacts arising from motion and bolus profile effects during contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) of the renal arteries (RAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A direct comparison of conventional and SENSE (acceleration factor 2) CE-MRA protocols was performed on 20 patients. Each patient underwent both scans. Both protocols achieved the same resolution, but the SENSE protocol was 50% faster and utilized a faster injection than the conventional scan. Three radiologists graded the images for image quality, artifact levels, and reader confidence.

RESULTS

While the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decreased (26+/-5 vs. 30+/-10; P=0.04) with the SENSE protocol, the image-quality scores for four identified segments of the RAs increased or were unchanged. The largest improvements in image quality occurred in the more distal segments of the RAs. Parenchymal ringing (P=0.005) and RA blurring (P=0.006) were significantly reduced, and there was a trend toward improvement of RA ringing despite the increased injection rate.

CONCLUSION

The faster SENSE scan maintained nearly the same SNR (due to faster injection of Gd-chelate), reduced artifact levels, and improved image quality ratings for the distal renal vessels.

The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: Comparative analysis with conventional arteriography

PURPOSE

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is commonly used as a screening modality for the detection of renal artery stenosis. However, evidence supporting its utility in clinical practice is lacking; few rigorous studies have compared MRA with contrast arteriography (CA). After making anecdotal clinical observations that MRA sometimes overestimated the degree of renal artery stenosis, we decided to determine the interobserver variability, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of MRA compared with CA.

METHODS

From September 1999 to April 2003, we evaluated 68 renal arteries in 34 patients with clinically suspected renal artery stenosis using both MRA and CA. All studies were independently reviewed by four blinded observers. Renal arteries were categorized by MRA as normal, <50%, and >50% stenosis/occlusion. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRA detection of renal artery stenosis were compared to CA as the gold standard. Interobserver variability (kappa) was also calculated.

RESULTS

MRA demonstrated 87% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 85% accuracy, 95% negative predictive value, and 51% positive predictive value for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Interobserver agreement was moderate for MRA (kappa = 0.53) and good for CA (kappa = 0.76). In 21 arteries (31%), MRA was falsely positive.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a high clinical suspicion of renal artery stenosis, MRA is 87% sensitive in the detection of >50% stenosis. However, MRA is relatively nonspecific compared with CA and results in significant overestimation of renal artery stenosis in nearly one third of patients. To reduce unnecessary CA, clinicians should consider supplemental studies.

Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine

PURPOSE

To prospectively and intraindividually compare 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine with 0.2 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval was granted by each of three participating centers. The study accorded with international standards for good clinical practice and Declaration of Helsinki and subsequent amendments. Patients gave written informed consent before enrollment. Patients (n = 34) underwent two MR angiographic examinations more than 48 hours but less than 12 days apart. Gadobenate dimeglumine followed by gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered in 18 patients; the order of administration was reversed in 16 patients. A 1.5-T MR imager was used with a phase-encoded three-dimensional spoiled breath-hold pulse sequence. Two blinded independent readers qualitatively assessed randomized subtracted maximum intensity projection images. A three-point scale for diagnostic quality (0, poor; 1a or 1p, moderate; and 2a or 2p, adequate [a and p refer, respectively, to absence and presence of vascular lesions]) was used to score each of nine segments of the abdominal aorta and both renal arteries (possible overall score, 18). Quantitative assessment (vessel signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], vessel-muscle contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) of source images was performed for regions of interest in supra-, juxta-, and infrarenal aorta segments and psoas muscle. Data were tested with analysis of variance for two-period crossover design. Interreader agreement was evaluated with Cohen kappa statistics.

RESULTS

No difference in mean image quality between the two contrast agents was observed; scores for gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine were 15.15 and 15.23 for reader 1 and 16.77 and 17.01 for reader 2. The order of contrast material administration likewise produced no quality differences: readers 1 and 2 reported scores of 14.4 +/- 4.2 (standard deviation) and 16.7 +/- 2.3, respectively, when gadobenate dimeglumine was given first, and 15.2 +/- 1.8 and 16.6 +/- 1.6, respectively, when gadopentetate dimeglumine was given first. Results of quantitative evaluation showed increasing SNR and CNR with gadobenate dimeglumine in segments at progressively lower levels of the aorta, but increases in SNR and CNR at the infrarenal aorta (48.3 vs 40.6 and 44.2 vs 36.4, respectively) were not significant (P = .05 for both).

CONCLUSION

Gadobenate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg is comparable to gadopentetate dimeglumine at 0.2 mmol/kg for contrast-enhanced renal MR angiography.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: evaluation of renal arteries in living renal transplant donors

One of the most important steps before living-donor nephrectomy is assessment of renal vascular anatomy. The number, origins and lengths of the renal arteries and variations of renal veins must be determined in order to identify the kidney that is most suitable for transplantation. Digital subtraction angiography was long considered the standard procedure for this purpose, but this method has been replaced by non-invasive techniques. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate, safe and reliable method for imaging vasculature. This article reviews the technique and the clinical features of this method in the evaluation of living renal transplant donors.

Renal MR angiography

The high accuracy of renal MR angiography makes it well suited for diagnosing renal vascular disease. A comprehensive examination includes three-dimensional gadolinium MR angiography to assess lumenal anatomy and functional techniques to assess the hemodynamic significance of any stenosis identified. Postprocessing is critical to provide reformations, maximum intensity projections, and optional volume-rendered images to display arteries in an angiographic format for optimal demonstration of any vascular lesions. It is important to review source images to avoid missing pathologic findings. As MR imaging continues to develop, the renal MR angiography examination will likely expand to include extensive functional information about creatinine clearance, flow, and response to pharmacologic agents as well as spectroscopy, diffusion, perfusion, phase contrast, and other techniques.

Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced three-dimensional MR-angiography: dosing, safety, and efficacy

Noninvasiveness, inherent three-dimensionality allowing reformations in any desired plane, and safe contrast agents, coupled with high diagnostic accuracy have driven the rise in popularity of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) within the medical community. Reflecting its dominant market share as a paramagnetic contrast agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) has been used for the majority of clinically-performed MRA exams. Over the period January 1994 to February 2002, a total of 172 original studies describing the use of gadolinium-enhanced MRA in more than three human subjects were identified. Of these, 117 described the use of Gd-DTPA as the contrast agent for MRA. A total of 4046 subjects who received Gd-DTPA for MRA are described in these studies. Analysis of these data demonstrate Gd-DTPA to be a safe contrast agent for MRA when applied in a dose ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 mmol/kg of bodyweight. The documented clinical results show Gd-DTPA to be efficacious in the assessment of the arterial system. The effectiveness of Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRA extends beyond the detection, localization, and characterization of arterial disease, and encompasses choice and planning of appropriate therapy, as well as evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness.

Parallel Imaging in MR Angiography

The recently developed techniques of parallel imaging with phased array coils are rapidly becoming accepted for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) applications. This article reviews the various current parallel imaging techniques and their application to MRA. The increased scan efficiency provided by parallel imaging allows increased temporal or spatial resolution, and reduction of artifacts in contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA). Increased temporal resolution in CE-MRA can be used to reduce the need for bolus timing and to provide hemodynamic information helpful for diagnosis. In addition, increased spatial resolution (or volume coverage) can be acquired in a breathhold (eg, in renal CE-MRA), or in otherwise limited clinically acceptable scan durations. The increased scan efficiency provided by parallel imaging has been successfully applied to CE-MRA as well as other MRA techniques such as inflow and phase contrast imaging. The large signal-to-noise ratio available in many MRA techniques lends these acquisitions to increased scan efficiency through parallel imaging.

Guidelines for the Reporting of Renal Artery Revascularization in Clinical Trials

Although the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis with use of percutaneous angioplasty, stent placement, and surgical revascularization has gained widespread use, there exist few prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these techniques to each other or against the standard of medical management alone. To facilitate this process as well as help answer many important questions regarding the appropriate application of renal revascularization, well-designed and rigorously conducted trials are needed. These trials must have clearly defined goals and must be sufficiently sized and performed so as to withstand intensive outcomes assessment. Toward this end, this document provides guidelines and definitions for the design, conduct, evaluation, and reporting of renal artery revascularization RCTs. In addition, areas of critically necessary renal artery revascularization investigation are identified. It is hoped that this information will be valuable to the investigator wishing to conduct research in this important area.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: development and optimization of techniques for paramagnetic and hyperpolarized contrast media

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is a diagnostic method for imaging of vascular structures based on nuclear magnetic resonance. Vascular enhancement is achieved by injection of a contrast medium (CM). Studies were performed using two different types of CM: conventional paramagnetic CM, and a new type of CM based on hyperpolarized (HP) nuclei. The effects of varying CM concentration with time during image acquisition were studied by means of computer simulations using two different models. It was shown that a rapid concentration variation during encoding of the central parts of k-space could result in signal loss and severe image artifacts. The results were confirmed qualitatively with phantom experiments. A postprocessing method was developed to address problems with simultaneous enhancement of arteries and veins in CE-MRA of the lower extremities. The method was based on the difference in flow-induced phase in the two vessel types. Evaluation of the method was performed with flow phantom measurements and with CE-MRA in two volunteers using standard pulse sequences. The flow-induced phase in the vessels of interest was sufficient to distinguish arteries from veins in the superior-inferior direction. Using this method, the venous enhancement could be extinguished. The possibility of using HP nuclei as CM for CE-MRA was evaluated. Signal expressions for a flow of HP CM imaged with a gradient echo sequence were derived. These signal expressions were confirmed in phantom experiments using HP 129Xe dissolved in ethanol. Studies were also performed with a new CM based on HP 13C. The CM had very long relaxation times (T1, in vivo/T2, in vivo approximately 38/1.3 s). The long relaxation times were utilized in imaging with a fully balanced steady-state free precession pulse sequence (trueFISP), where the optimal flip angle was found to be 180 degrees. CE-MRA with the 13C-based CM in rats resulted in images with high vascular SNR (approximately 500). CE-MRA is a useful clinical tool for diagnosing vascular disease. With the development of new contrast media, based on hyperpolarized nuclei for example, there is a potential for further improvement in the signal levels that can be achieved, enabling a standard of imaging of vessels that is not possible today.

Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model

PURPOSE

To investigate pharmacokinetic and physiologic factors that determine the time to peak intravenous contrast medium enhancement in computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the porcine mid-abdominal aorta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four pigs were imaged repeatedly in seven to eight sets: For each set, 20 dynamic CT scans were obtained at a fixed aortic level after intravenous injection of contrast medium. From a physiologically based compartment model, aortic contrast enhancement curves were generated by varying contrast medium injection duration from 1 to 40 seconds. Contrast enhancement curves and times to peak aortic enhancement from the experiment and model were compared. Time to peak aortic enhancement obtained from the injection with the shortest duration was considered the time to peak test bolus contrast enhancement. Mathematic and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to investigate factors that determine peak enhancement.

RESULTS

Empiric and compartmental model times to peak aortic enhancement were in good agreement. Time to peak aortic enhancement corresponded to the weighted sum of injection duration and time to peak test bolus enhancement. With increasing injection duration, the relative contribution of injection duration to peak aortic enhancement time increased. When injection duration was longer than time to peak test bolus enhancement, time to peak aortic enhancement increased linearly with injection duration and occurred shortly after completion of injection. However, when injection duration was shorter than time to peak test bolus enhancement, time to peak aortic enhancement was determined predominantly by time to peak test bolus enhancement and only gradually increased with injection duration.

CONCLUSION

Time to peak aortic enhancement is determined by the relative contributions of injection duration and contrast medium traveling time and may well be explained by contrast medium volumetric inflow and recirculation physiology.

MR angiography of the carotid arteries: parameters affecting image quality

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to evaluate the relationship between dose levels of contrast medium and image quality in magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the carotid arteries with fluoroscopically monitored, manually triggered, elliptically ordered image acquisitions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with clinical indications for angiography of the carotid arteries were examined with MR at 1.5 T by using a fluoroscopically monitored, manually triggered, elliptically ordered pulse sequence with the administration of one of three different volumes of gadolinium-based contrast medium. The signal intensities of the vessel lumen and the surrounding tissues were measured in single partitions at the origin of the common carotid artery, the carotid bifurcation, and the intracranial internal carotid arteries. The contrast-to-noise ratio in these regions of interest also was measured. Maximum intensity projection image quality was appraised for blurring, artifacts, venous enhancement, background suppression, and contrast medium distribution.

RESULTS

No artifacts or venous enhancement was observed. The position of the fluoroscopic section affected the distribution of contrast medium along the vessel, as evidenced by the difference between the contrast-to-noise ratio at the origin of the common carotid artery and the ratio at the carotid bifurcation and the intracranial internal carotid arteries (P < .01). The contrast medium dose administered was strongly correlated with image quality (r = 0.90).

CONCLUSION

Contrast medium dose is related to image quality in MR angiography of the carotid arteries performed with elliptical ordering, fluoroscopic monitoring, and manual triggering.

Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice

Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) uses multiple MRI receive coil elements to encode spatial information in addition to traditional gradient encoding. Requiring less gradient encodings translates into shorter scan times, which is extremely beneficial in many clinical applications. SENSE is available to routine diagnostic imaging for the past 2 years. This paper highlights the use of SENSE with scan time reduction factors up to 6 in contrast-enhanced MRA, routine abdominal imaging, mammography, cardiac and neuro imaging. It is shown that SENSE has opened new horizons in both routine and advanced MR imaging.

Prospective blinded evaluation of Gd-DOTA- versus Gd-BOPTA-enhanced peripheral MR angiography, as compared with digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced versus gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients underwent MR angiography enhanced with either Gd-DOTA (28 patients) or Gd-BOPTA (28 patients). All arterial segments from the renal arteries to the distal run-off vessels were evaluated for disease severity. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR angiography enhanced with both agents separately were evaluated with a paired t test; digital subtraction angiography was the reference standard. Interobserver variability was assessed by using the Cohen test.

RESULTS

Diagnostic MR angiograms were obtained in all 56 patients. Overall, sensitivity and specificity of Gd-DOTA-enhanced MR angiography were 96% and 93%, respectively, for observer 1 and 96% and 85%, respectively, for observer 2 (kappa = 0.82). Corresponding values for Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR angiography were 94% and 93%, respectively, for observer 1 and 94% and 89%, respectively, for observer 2 (kappa = 0.78). No consistent differences between the two contrast materials in assessment of PAOD in the renal to popliteal arteries were observed. For assessment below the knee, specificity was slightly higher in the Gd-BOPTA group-91% and 84% for observers 1 and 2, respectively-than in the Gd-DOTA group-89% and 77%, respectively (P <.01). The number of nonassessable below-the-knee segments was significantly lower in the Gd-BOPTA group: nine of 299 segments versus 25 of 312 segments in the Gd-DOTA group (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

At MR angiography of the distal run-off vessels, Gd-BOPTA yielded higher specificity and a significantly smaller number of nonassessable segments than Gd-DOTA. The diagnostic accuracy of the two gadolinium chelates at peripheral MR angiography was comparable in the renal to popliteal arteries.

MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and peripheral vessels

Contrast-enhanced MRA can be an accurate and reliable method for the arterial evaluation of the abdominal aorta and peripheral vessels. This technique can be adapted for a variety of anatomic regions. The basic issues relate to proper synchronization of imaging with peak arterial enhancement and to optimization of voxel dimensions for adequate depiction of the arterial structures.

Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR angiography technique with elliptical centric view order and no prolonged breath-holding time

PURPOSE

To determine the appropriate rate of fat-suppression pulses (using spec IR-spectral selective inversion recovery) for fat-suppressed 3D magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with an elliptical centric view order.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In abdominal 3D fast spoiled gradient echo (fast SPGR) with an elliptical centric view order, the spec IR pulse rate was changed from zero to one every 15 repetitions (in nine steps) in eight volunteers. In the equilibrium phase, abdominal contrast-enhanced 3D MRA was obtained by 3D fast SPGR using an elliptical centric view order without fat-suppression and with two spec IR, and by fat-suppressed 3D fast SPGR with a sequential-centric view order (efgre3D) in 18 cases. Fat and vascular signals were estimated.

RESULTS

Although 3D fast SPGR using an elliptical centric view order with spec IR placed every 15 TR and efgre3D effectively decreased fat signals, these sequences lengthened the breath-hold by 4-6 seconds compared with non-fat-suppressed sequence. 3D fast SPGR using an elliptical centric view order and two spec IR reduced the fat signal by 30% and provided good 3D MR angiography without substantial prolongation of breath-hold.

CONCLUSION

Two spec IR can be used for generation of partially fat-suppressed abdominal 3D MRA without prolongation of the breath-hold when performing 3D fast SPGR using an elliptical centric view order.

Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials

Although the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis with use of percutaneous angioplasty, stent placement, and surgical revascularization has gained widespread use, there exist few prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these techniques to each other or against the standard of medical management alone. To facilitate this process as well as help answer many important questions regarding the appropriate application of renal revascularization, well-designed and rigorously conducted trials are needed. These trials must have clearly defined goals and must be sufficiently sized and performed so as to withstand intensive outcomes assessment. Toward this end, this document provides guidelines and definitions for the design, conduct, evaluation, and reporting of renal artery revascularization RCTs. In addition, areas of critically necessary renal artery revascularization investigation are identified. It is hoped that this information will be valuable to the investigator wishing to conduct research in this important area.

MR angiography of the renal arteries

During, the past decade. MRA has evolved from an cxperimental technique into the modality of choice for the noninvasive evaluation of renovascular disease. The recent widespread application of MRA for these indications has been driven primarily by the advent of 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. which provides a fast, reliable technique for imaging large vascular territories and generates images, after postprocessing, similar in appearance to digital subtraction angiography. The cross-sectional volumetric nature of contrast-enhanced MRA affords some advantages over conventional catheter angiography. Although 3D contrast-enhanced MRA forms the backbone of vascular MR studies, several adjunctive sequences are employed to maximize the diagnostic yield of the examination. For example. flow-dependant imaging is used to complement the morphologic images of contrast-enhanced MRA by providing hemodynamic information. As such, MRA is unique among noninvasive imaging modalities in that it offers a comprehensive evaluation of anatomy and function. The availability and reliability of MRA extend renal artery screening to a wider spectrum of patients. Current applications of renal MRA range from detection of renal artery stenosis to evaluation for renal transplant donors.

Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis

AIM

To review the published literature comparing the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with and without gadolinium in diagnosing renal artery stenosis, using catheter angiography as reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed of English language articles identified by computer search using PubMed/MEDLINE, followed by extensive bibliography review from 1985 to May 2001. Inclusion criteria were: (1) blinded comparison with catheter angiography; (2)indication for MRA stated; (3) clear descriptions of imaging techniques; and (4) interval between MRA and catheter angiography < 3 months and only the largest of all studies from one centre was selected in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were identified, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria. The number of patients included in the meta-analysis was 998: 499 with non-enhanced MRA and 499 with gadolinium-enhanced MRA. The sensitivity and specificity of non-enhanced MRA were 94% (95% CI: 90-97%) and 85% (95% CI: 82-87%), respectively. For gadolinium-enhanced MRA sensitivity was 97% (95% CI: 93-98%) and specificity was 93% (95% CI: 91-95%). Thus, specificity and positive predictive value were significantly better for gadolinium-enhanced MRA (P < 0.001). Accessory renal arteries were depicted better by gadolinium-enhanced MRA (82%; 95% CI: 75-87%) than non-gadolinium MRA (49%; 95% CI: 42-60%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadolinium-enhanced MRA may replace arteriography in most patients with suspected renal artery stenosis, and has major advantages in that it is non-invasive, avoids ionizing radiation and uses a non-nephrotoxic contrast agent.

Evaluation of arterial bypass grafts of the pelvic and lower extremities with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the assessment of patency and stenoses in bypass grafts.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were examined with both CE MRA and DSA. Fifteen bypass grafts were evaluated by four readers for potential stenosis in five locations. The stenoses were classified in five types: 1 (0% to 24% stenosis), 2 (25% to 49%), 3 (50% to 74%), 4 (75% to 99%), and 5 (occlusion).

RESULTS

Using both techniques, 70 of 75 evaluated locations (93.3%) were classified identically. This included six stenoses < 50% and six stenoses > 50%, respectively. Four of five overestimations of stenoses were scaled in DSA as stenoses type 1. One stenosis was categorized as type 3 in DSA. Sensitivity for CE MRA for detecting stenoses >or= 25% was 100% and the specificity 90%. Interobserver agreement for all evaluations was 0.77 (Spearman rank correlation test).

CONCLUSION

In the assessment of low-grade stenosis in bypass grafts, CE MRA overestimates stenoses slightly but yields good results in comparison with DSA.

Contrast-enhanced MR perfusion imaging and MR angiography: utility for management of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations for embolotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the capability of MR perfusion imaging and angiography (MRA) for management of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM).

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Eight patients, having 15 PAVMs underwent pulmonary angiography (PAG), CT, MR perfusion imaging and MRA. For the pretherapeutic management, MRA was compared with PAG and CT regarding detectability and diameter of vasculature. For post-therapeutic management, the change in size of aneurysmal sac, any residual contrast-enhancement and the blood supply within the sac were evaluated.

RESULTS

All PAVMs with aneurysmal sac, feeding artery and draining vein diameters of equal to or more than 3 mm, were identified and measured with similar results by all modalities. On follow-up studies, 7 (58.4%) out of 12 treated PAVMs showed a decrease in size and residual contrast-enhancement. The residual contrast-enhancement was considered as bronchial artery-to-pulmonary artery collateral flow by MR perfusion imaging.

CONCLUSION

MR perfusion imaging and MRangiography are useful for management of PAVMs over 3 mm in diameter.

Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study

The effect of combined morphologic and functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the interobserver and intermodality variability for the grading of renal artery stenosis is assessed. In a randomized, blinded tricenter analysis, seven readers evaluated 43 renal arteries on x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA), 3D-Gadolinium MR angiography (3D-Gd-MRA), cine phase-contrast flow measurement (PC-flow), and a combined analysis of the last two. Interobserver variability was assessed for the grading of renal artery stenosis as well as regional vessel visibility. Intermodality variability for stenosis grading was analyzed in cases in which the readers agreed on the degree of stenosis in DSA. DSA had a substantial interobserver variability for the grading of stenosis (mean kappa kappa 0.64). 3D-Gd-MRA revealed a slightly improved interobserver variability but incorrectly graded 6 of 34 stenoses on a two-point scale (<50%, > or =50%). The combined approach of 3D-Gd-MRA and PC-flow revealed the best (P = 0.0003) interobserver variability (median kappa = 0.75) and almost perfect intermodality agreement with DSA (97% of cases). These findings were confirmed in a prospective analysis of 97 renal arteries. The vessel visibility of the renal artery ostium was significantly better in 3D-Gd-MRA than in DSA, whereas the visibility of the hilar and intrarenal vessels was significantly worse (P = 0.0001). A combined morphologic and functional MR examination significantly reduces interobserver variability and offers reliable and reproducible grading of renal artery stenosis based on stenosis morphology and hemodynamic changes. It can be considered a safe and noninvasive alternative for diagnostic DSA in cases that do not require assessment of intrarenal vessels.

Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: a pilot comparison of maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reformatting, and 3D volume-rendering postprocessing algorithms

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors compared diagnostic accuracy of maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reformatting (MPR), and three-dimensional (3D) volume rendering (VR) in the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries. They hypothesized that VR is as accurate as or more accurate than MIP and MPR at depicting renal artery stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group comprised 28 consecutive patients who underwent gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the renal arteries. Studies were postprocessed to display images in MIP, MPR, and VR formats. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), when performed (nine of 28 patients), was the standard for comparison. For each main renal artery, an estimate of percentage stenosis was made for any stenoses detected by three independent radiologists. For calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, MR angiographic stenosis estimates were categorized as mild (0%-39%), moderate (40%-69%), or severe (> or = 70%). DSA stenosis estimates of 70% or greater were considered hemodynamically significant.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance demonstrated MIP estimates of stenosis were statistically greater than VR estimates in two readers and greater than MPR estimates in all readers for all patients. MIP images also showed the largest mean difference from DSA stenosis estimates for all three readers. For both VR and MPR, mean differences between MR angiographic stenoses estimates and DSA estimates reached significance for only one reader, whereas, for MIP versus DSA, mean differences reached significance for all three readers. Although not statistically significant compared with DSA, accuracies of VR (87%) and MPR (89%) were greater than that of MIP (81%).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, MIP was the least accurate of the three image display algorithms tested. VR and MPR yielded similar values for each method of comparison.

Separation of arteries and veins using flow-induced phase effects in contrast-enhanced MRA of the lower extremities

In 3-D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the lower extremities the goal is most often to enhance arterial structures while keeping veins and surrounding tissue unenhanced. Imaging during steady-state concentration of a blood pool agent or during poor timing of an extra-cellular contrast medium may result in simultaneous venous enhancement, making interpretation of the angiogram difficult. The aim of this study was to develop a post-processing method to separate the arteries from the veins in standard contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. The method was based on the different accumulation of flow-induced phase in the arteries and veins of the lower extremities. The method was tested in both phantom experiments and volunteers undergoing 3-D contrast-enhanced MR angiography using both an extra-cellular contrast medium and a blood pool agent. In the phantom studies, opposite directional flow was successfully separated at mean flow velocities as low as 9 cm/s. In the volunteer studies, the larger veins were successfully extinguished while the larger arteries were left unaffected. In smaller vessels with low flow velocities the separation was less successful. This was most apparent in vessels not oriented superior-inferior. The method developed here is promising for separating arteries from veins in contrast-enhanced MR angiography although the results could be further improved by either a different pulse sequence design or combining this method with other segmentation methods.

An evidence-based approach to diagnosing renovascular hypertension

Making the diagnosis of potentially reversible renovascular hypertension can be problematic. Although there are a number of noninvasive screening tests available, no one study is appropriate for every patient. In general, the available tests can be divided into those that identify the functional consequences of a renal artery obstruction (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-augmented renography) and those that identify the anatomic presence of stenosis (duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and contrast tomography angiography). The most appropriate diagnostic approach is based largely on the clinical index of suspicion, the potential etiology of the renal artery lesion (fibromuscular dysplasia or atherosclerosis), and the individual patient's physiology and presentation. A potential treatment algorithm is presented.

Detection of renal artery stenosis: prospective comparison of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced scintigraphy, and MR angiography

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to compare the value of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for detecting renal artery stenosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with suspected renovascular hypertension were prospectively examined with captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and catheter angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of each technique for detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater and 70% or greater were compared using the McNemar test. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated for populations with 5% and 30% prevalence of renal artery stenosis. Kappa values for interobserver agreement were assessed for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and catheter angiography.

RESULTS

For detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, the sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (96.6%) was greater than that of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography (69%, p = 0.005) and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy (41.4%, p = 0.001). No significant difference in specificity was observed among modalities. For renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 62% and 86% for captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, 49% and 76% for captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and 53% and 98% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Interobserver agreement was high for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (kappa = 0.829) and catheter angiography (kappa = 0.729).

CONCLUSION

Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is the most accurate noninvasive modality for detecting renal artery stenosis greater than or equal to 50%. The use of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography in combination with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for identifying renal artery stenosis needs to be evaluated with a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Noninvasive imaging of living related kidney donors: evaluation with CT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to determine whether noninvasive imaging with CT angiography and MR angiography in the preoperative investigation of living, related kidney donors provides sufficient information for the surgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty consecutive potential living kidney donors were investigated. Fifty patients underwent CT angiography and 30 underwent MR angiography before donor nephrectomy. CT was performed using 3-mm collimation with a pitch of 1.6 after the injection of 150 mL of nonionic contrast medium. The axial data, multiplanar reconstructions, and maximum intensity projections were reviewed. MR angiography was performed on a 1-T magnet using a contrast-enhanced three-dimensional gradient echo technique. Maximum intensity projections and axial reformations were reviewed. Imaging findings were compared with the surgical results in 54 patients.

RESULTS

CT angiography and MR angiography were 100% sensitive in identifying the main renal arteries and renal veins. CT angiography visualized 37 of the 40 arteries identified at surgery, for a detection rate of 93%. MR angiography visualized 18 of the 20 arteries identified at surgery, a detection rate of 90%.

CONCLUSION

CT angiography and MR angiography are suitable for the noninvasive investigation of living kidney donors and provide all the information required by the surgeon. Both methods may miss small accessory renal arteries. MR angiography does not use potentially toxic contrast material or radiation and is the preferred investigation, with CT angiography reserved for patients unable to tolerate MR imaging.

Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography--clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls

Gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography (MRA) is becoming a widely accepted technique for imaging the vascular system. We set out to evaluate its accuracy and reliability in visualization of renal arteries in the clinical setting. Gadolinium enhanced MRA was performed in 15 potential live renal donors and 26 patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis who were referred for digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MRA was performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner in a single breath hold. Images from each study were prospectively analysed for demonstration of number of main and accessory renal arteries and degree of renal artery stenosis in a double blind fashion. All the main and accessory arteries were visualized on MRA in the renal donor group, but in one case a branch was not identified owing to breathing artefact. In one case, an extrarenal vascular anomaly was not demonstrated on MRA. In the renal artery stenosis group, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values of 96%, 93% and 96% were obtained for clinically significant stenosis (>50%). Gadolinium enhanced MRA proved to be a useful technique in demonstration of renal arterial anatomy and grading of renal artery stenosis. However, we encountered some pitfalls and limitations of the technique during the process. It is important to be aware of these before accepting it as the sole technique in clinical practice.

Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography and to evaluate its accuracy in revealing renal artery stenosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients underwent MR angiography using an ultrafast 3D Fourier transform spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (TR/TE range, 2.6/0.7--0.8). Five seconds after administration of 15--20 mL gadodiamide hydrate, four or five consecutive data sets with imaging times of 7.0--7.6 sec were acquired during a single breath-hold. A timing examination was not performed. Image quality was assessed using quantitative analysis (signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, and venous-to-arterial enhancement ratios) and qualitative analysis (presence of venous overlap, presence of artifacts, and degree of renal arterial enhancement). MR angiography depiction of the renal artery stenosis was evaluated using conventional angiography as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

On the best arterial phase, average aortic signal-to-noise ratio (+/-SD) was 74.5 +/- 24.4, aorta-to--inferior vena cava contrast-to-noise ratio was 70.8 +/- 23.4, and inferior vena cava--to-aorta venous-to-arterial enhancement ratio was 0.03 +/- 0.04. No venous overlap was seen in 38 of 39 patients. Substantial enhancement of renal arteries was seen in all patients without any noticeable artifacts. MR angiography correctly depicted the degree of stenosis in 44 of 47 normal arteries, 13 of 16 mildly stenotic arteries, five of five moderately stenotic arteries, three of four severely stenotic arteries, and one of one occluded artery. Sensitivity and specificity for revealing greater than 50% stenosis was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Time-resolved 3D MR angiography can provide high-quality arteriograms. Its performance in revealing renal artery stenosis is comparable with that of conventional angiography.

Safety and effectiveness of single- versus triple-dose gadodiamide injection- enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen: a phase III double-blind multicenter study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gadodiamide-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with single and triple doses in the assessment of abdominal arterial stenoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred five patients were included in the randomized, double-blind, phase III multicenter trial. Results of MR angiography with 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.3 mmol/kg doses of gadodiamide were compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and according to dose.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events were observed. The mean contrast index at the region proximal to the primary stenosis was significantly higher in the triple-dose group (P =.03). Mean 95% CI values for the difference in depicted degree of stenosis between DSA and postcontrast MR angiography improved from -3.4% +/- 4.7 (SD) in the single-dose group to -1.2% +/- 4.7 in the triple-dose group. Mean values for overall image quality on the visual analogue scale improved with the triple dose (P =.02). Confidence in diagnosis was high at postcontrast MR angiography in 88% and 96% of cases in the single- and triple-dose groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography performed with single and triple doses is safe and effective for assessing major abdominal arterial stenoses. Although high agreement between MR angiography and DSA was achieved with both doses, triple-dose MR angiography was superior in the evaluations of image quality, degree of arterial stenoses, and confidence in diagnosis.

Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: applications for abdominal imaging

Three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is a versatile technique that combines speed, superb contrast, and relative simplicity. It has a wide range of applications, particularly in the abdomen and pelvis, where superb images of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries are routinely obtained. Aneurysms, atherosclerotic lesions, and occlusions of the major mesenteric arteries are also well depicted. In addition, 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is ideal for noninvasive evaluation of the systemic and mesenteric veins and can be used to demonstrate parenchymal lesions in the liver, pancreas, kidneys, and other organs. It is also useful in staging genitourinary neoplasms: Parenchymal lesions, venous extension, and adenopathy are all clearly depicted. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography can be useful in the preoperative evaluation of potential transplant donors and recipients and in the evaluation of vascular complications following transplantation. Delayed 3D acquisitions of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder can be performed routinely to generate gadolinium-enhanced urograms and demonstrate obstruction, delayed function, filling defects, and masses. A variety of methods for increasing the speed and improving the resolution of 3D acquisition are currently under investigation. These include novel imaging and reformatting techniques and the use of intravascular contrast agents with much longer vascular half-lives.

Multiphase ECG-triggered 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography: utility for evaluation of hilar and mediastinal invasion of bronchogenic carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of cardiac synchronized magnetic resonance angiography [electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered MRA] for improving image quality and detection of hilar and mediastinal invasion of bronchogenic carcinoma. Fifty patients, suspected of having hilar or mediastinal invasion of bronchogenic carcinoma, underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography and MR imaging including conventional and ECG-triggered MRA. Twenty patients subsequently also underwent surgical resection. Vascular enhancement-to-background ratio (VBR), vascular enhancement-to-tumor ratio (VTR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image quality scores of thoracic vessels obtained with both MRA techniques were determined and compared. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of tumor invasion of pulmonary vessels was compared. VBRs and VTRs of both MRA techniques were not significantly different. ECG-triggered MRA significantly improved SNRs and CNRs (P < 0.05). Two readers judged that overall image quality of ECG-triggered MRA was better than that of conventional MRA (kappa > or = 0.41). In conclusion, ECG-triggered MRA improves the image quality and the detection of hilar and mediastinal invasion of bronchogenic carcinoma.

High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate a high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional (3D) contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic technique for detecting proximal and distal renal arterial stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent high-spatial-resolution small-field-of-view (FOV) 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries, which was followed several minutes later by more standard, large-FOV 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography that included the distal aorta and iliac arteries. For both acquisitions, MR fluoroscopic triggering and an elliptic centric view order were used. Two readers evaluated the MR angiograms for grade and hemodynamic significance of renal arterial stenosis, diagnostic quality, and presence of artifacts. MR imaging results for each patient were compared with those of digital subtraction angiograms.

RESULTS

The high-spatial-resolution small-FOV technique provided high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (92%) for the detection of renal arterial stenosis, including all four distal stenoses encountered. The portrayal of the segmental renal arteries was adequate for diagnosis in 19 (76%) of 25 patients. In 12% of the patients, impaired depiction of the segmental arteries was linked to motion.

CONCLUSION

The combined high-spatial-resolution small-FOV and large-FOV MR angiographic examination provides improved spatial resolution in the region of the renal arteries while maintaining coverage of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries.

Contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: optimization of technique and pitfalls

The authors describe the optimization of a contrast-enhanced, breath-held, three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (CE-BH-3DMRA) technique in the assessment of the renal arteries and compare its utility with conventional x-ray angiography (XRA). Signal optimization using specific pulse sequence parameters was based on the patient's circulatory conditions, injection rate, and pulse sequence timing. Fifty-one patients (27 M, 24 F; mean age 69.7 years) were evaluated with CE-BH-3DMRA and XRA. All patients had an MR angiogram 3 months either before or after XRA. A test bolus study was performed for accurate assessment of transit time in each patient. A total of 51 patients (115 vessels) were studied in which the sensitivity and specificity for all renal artery stenoses including the proximal and mid-renal arterial segments were 96% and 92%, respectively. In-stent stenosis could only be diagnosed by quantifying flow beyond the stent using an additional triggered phase contrast cine pulse sequence. A total of 11 accessory renal arteries were correctly identified. In addition, fibromuscular dysplasia in two patients and stents in three patients were correctly identified on MRA. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:912-923.

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 +/- 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25 degrees flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated.

RESULTS

Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography.

CONCLUSION

Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.