Interstudy reproducibility of SSFP cine magnetic resonance: Impact of magnetic field strength and parallel imaging

Normative ranges of biventricular volumes and function in healthy term newborns

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used in newborns with congenital heart disease. However, reporting on ventricular volumes and mass is hindered by an absence of normative data in this population.

DESIGN/METHODS

Healthy term (37-41 weeks gestation) newborns underwent non-sedated, free-breathing CMR within the first week of life using the 'feed and wrap' technique. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated for both left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV). Papillary muscles were separately contoured and included in the myocardial volume. Myocardial mass was calculated by multiplying myocardial volume by 1.05 g/ml. All data were indexed to weight and body surface area (BSA). Inter-observer variability (IOV) was performed on data from 10 randomly chosen infants.

RESULTS

Twenty healthy newborns (65% male) with a mean (SD) birth weight of 3.54 (0.46) kg and BSA of 0.23 (0.02) m2 were included. Normative LV parameters were indexed EDV 39.0 (4.1) ml/m2, ESV 14.5 (2.5) ml/m2 and ejection fraction (EF) 63.2 (3.4)%. Normative RV indexed EDV, ESV and EF were 47.4 (4.5) ml/m2, 22.6 (2.9) ml/m2 and 52.5 (3.3)% respectively. Mean LV and RV indexed mass were 26.4 (2.8) g/m2 and 12.5 (2.0) g/m2, respectively. There was no difference in ventricular volumes by gender. IOV was excellent with an intra-class coefficient > 0.95 except for RV mass (0.94).

CONCLUSION

This study provides normative data on LV and RV parameters in healthy newborns, providing a novel resource for comparison with newborns with structural and functional heart disease.

Cardiac index: A superior parameter of cardiac function than left ventricular ejection fraction in risk stratification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

An appropriate indicator of cardiac function in the risk stratification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients is urgently needed. Cardiac index that reflects cardiac pumping function may be suitable.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of reduced cardiac index in HCM patients.

METHODS

A total of 927 HCM patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death. The secondary endpoints were sudden cardiac death (SCD) and all-cause death. Combination models were constructed by adding reduced cardiac index and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to the HCM risk-SCD model. Predictive accuracy was determined by C-statistics.

RESULTS

Reduced cardiac index was defined as cardiac index ≤2.42 L/min/m². During median follow-up of 4.3 years, 51 patients reached the endpoint. Reduced cardiac index independently increased the risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.976; P = .007), SCD (aHR 6.385; P = .001), and all-cause death (aHR 2.428; P = .010). By adding reduced cardiac index to the HCM risk-SCD model, the model C-statistic increased from 0.691 to 0.762, with an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.021 (P = .018) and a net reclassification improvement of 0.560 (P = .007). The addition of reduced LVEF failed to improve the original model. Better predictive accuracy for all endpoints was also indicated in reduced cardiac index than in reduced LVEF.

CONCLUSION

Reduced cardiac index is an independent predictor of poor prognoses in HCM patients. Combining reduced cardiac index rather than reduced LVEF improved the HCM risk-SCD stratification strategy. The reduced cardiac index showed better predictive accuracy than reduced LVEF for all endpoints.

Impact of Field Strength in Clinical Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ABSTRACT

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely applied for the noninvasive assessment of cardiac structure and function, and for tissue characterization. For more than 2 decades, 1.5 T has been considered the field strength of choice for cardiac MRI. Although the number of 3-T systems significantly increased in the past 10 years and numerous new developments were made, challenges seem to remain that hamper a widespread clinical use of 3-T MR systems for cardiac applications. As the number of clinical cardiac applications is increasing, with each having their own benefits at both field strengths, no "holy grail" field strength exists for cardiac MRI that one should ideally use. This review describes the physical differences between 1.5 and 3 T, as well as the effect of these differences on major (routine) cardiac MRI applications, including functional imaging, edema imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, first-pass stress perfusion, myocardial mapping, and phase contrast flow imaging. For each application, the advantages and limitations at both 1.5 and 3 T are discussed. Solutions and alternatives are provided to overcome potential limitations. Finally, we briefly elaborate on the potential use of alternative field strengths (ie, below 1.5 T and above 3 T) for cardiac MRI and conclude with field strength recommendations for the future of cardiac MRI.

Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) enables assessment and quantification of morphological and functional parameters of the heart, including chamber size and function, diameters of the aorta and pulmonary arteries, flow and myocardial relaxation times. Knowledge of reference ranges ("normal values") for quantitative CMR is crucial to interpretation of results and to distinguish normal from disease. Compared to the previous version of this review published in 2015, we present updated and expanded reference values for morphological and functional CMR parameters of the cardiovascular system based on the peer-reviewed literature and current CMR techniques. Further, databases and references for deep learning methods are included.

Assessment of cardiac function, blood flow and myocardial tissue relaxation parameters at 0.35 T

A low field strength (B0) system could increase cardiac MRI availability for patients otherwise contraindicated at higher field. Lower equipment costs could also broaden cardiac MR accessibility. The current study investigated the feasibility of cardiac function with steady-state free precession and flow assessment with phase contrast (PC) cine images at 0.35 T, and evaluated differences in myocardial relaxation times using quantitative T1, T2 and T2* maps by comparison with 1.5 and 3 T results in a small cohort of six healthy volunteers. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) differences across systems were characterized with proton density-weighted spin echo phantom data. SNR at 0.35 T was lower by factors of 5.5 and 15.0 compared with the 1.5 and 3 T systems used in this study. All cine images at 0.35 T scored 3 or greater on a five-point image quality scale. Normalized blood-myocardium contrast in cine images, left ventricular volumes (end diastolic volume, end systolic volume) and function (ejection fraction and stroke volume) measures at 0.35 T matched 1.5 and 3 T results. Phase-to-noise ratio in 0.35 T PC images (11.7 ± 1.9) was lower than 1.5 T (18.7 ± 5.2) and 3 T (44.9 ± 16.5). Peak velocity and stroke volume determined from PC images were similar across systems. Myocardial T1 increased (564 ± 13 ms at 0.35 T, 955 ± 19 ms at 1.5 T and 1200 ± 35 ms at 3 T) while T2 (59 ± 4 ms at 0.35 T, 49 ± 3 ms at 1.5 T and 40 ± 2 ms at 3 T) and T2* (42 ± 8 ms at 0.35 T, 33 ± 6 ms at 1.5 T and 24 ± 3 ms at 3 T) decreased with increasing B0. Despite SNR deficits, cardiovascular function, flow assessment and myocardial relaxation parameter mapping is feasible at 0.35 T using standard cardiovascular imaging sequences.

A comparison of cine CMR imaging at 0.55 T and 1.5 T

BACKGROUND

There is a renewed interest in lower field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), due to their favorable physical properties, reduced costs, and increased accessibility to patients with implants. We sought to assess the diagnostic capabilities of high-performance low-field (0.55 T) CMR imaging for quantification of right and left ventricular volumes and systolic function in both healthy subjects and patients referred for clinical CMR.

METHODS

Sixty-five subjects underwent paired exams at 1.5 T using a clinical CMR scanner and using an identical CMR system modified to operate at 0.55 T. Volumetric coverage of the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricles (LV) was obtained using either a breath-held cine balanced steady-state free-precession acquisition or a motion-corrected free-breathing re-binned cine acquisition. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare LV and RV end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), ejection fraction (EF), and LV mass. Diagnostic confidence was scored on a Likert-type ordinal scale by blinded readers.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in LV and RV EDV between the two scanners (e.g., LVEDV: p = 0.77, bias = 0.40 mL, correlation coefficient = 0.99; RVEDV: p = 0.17, bias = - 1.6 mL, correlation coefficient = 0.98), and regional wall motion abnormality scoring was similar (kappa 0.99). Blood-myocardium contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at 0.55 T was 48 ± 7% of the 1.5 T CNR, and contrast was sufficient for endocardial segmentation in all cases. Diagnostic confidence of images was scored as "good" to "excellent" for the two field strengths in the majority of studies.

CONCLUSION

A high-performance 0.55 T system offers good bSSFP CMR image quality, and quantification of biventricular volumes and systolic function that is comparable to 1.5 T in patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03331380, NCT03581318.

Dynamic Relation of Changes in Weight and Indices of Fat Distribution With Cardiac Structure and Function: The Dallas Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Obesity may increase heart failure risk through cardiac remodeling. Cross-sectional associations between adiposity and cardiac structure and function have been elucidated, but the impact of longitudinal changes in adiposity on cardiac remodeling is less well understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Participants in the Dallas Heart Study without cardiovascular disease or left ventricular dysfunction underwent assessment of body weight, anthropometrics, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and 7 years later. Associations between changes in indices of generalized and central adiposity with changes in left ventricular mass, volume, mass/volume ratio (concentricity), wall thickness, and ejection fraction were assessed using multivariable linear regression. The study cohort (n=1262) mean age was 44 years with 57% women, 44% black, and 36% obese participants. At follow-up, 41% had ≥5% weight gain, and 15% had ≥5% weight loss. Greater weight gain was associated with younger age, lower risk factor burden, and lower body mass index at baseline. In multivariable models adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbid conditions at baseline and follow-up, baseline adiposity, and cardiac measurement, increasing weight was associated with increases in left ventricular mass (β=0.10, P<0.0001), wall thickness (β=0.10, P<0.0001), and concentricity (β=0.06, P=0.002), with modest effects on end-diastolic volume (β=0.04, P=0.044) and ejection fraction (β=0.05, P=0.046). Similar results were seen with other adiposity indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Concentric left ventricular remodeling is the predominant phenotype linked to increasing adiposity in middle age. Our findings support the importance of weight management to prevent secular changes in adiposity, concentric remodeling, and eventual heart failure over time.

Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Recently, 1.5-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was reported to provide a reliable alternative to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for the quantification of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Few data are available using higher magnetic field strength MRI systems in this context.

AIMS

To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of the assessment of aortic valve area (AVA) using 3-Tesla CMR in routine clinical practice, and to assess concordance between TTE and CMR for the estimation of AS severity.

METHODS

Ninety-one consecutive patients (60 men; mean age 74±10years) with known AS documented by TTE were included prospectively in the study.

RESULTS

All patients underwent comprehensive TTE and CMR examination, including AVA estimation using the TTE continuity equation (0.81±0.18cm²), direct CMR planimetry (CMRp) (0.90±0.22cm²) and CMR using Hakki's formula (CMRhk), a simplified Gorlin formula (0.70±0.19cm²). Although significant agreement with TTE was found for CMRp (r=0.72) and CMRhk (r=0.66), CMRp slightly overestimated (bias=0.11±0.18cm²) and CMRhk slightly underestimated (bias=-0.11±0.17cm²) AVA compared with TTE. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibilities of CMR measurements were excellent (r=0.72 and r=0.74 for CMRp and r=0.88 and r=0.92 for peak aortic velocity, respectively).

CONCLUSION

3-Tesla CMR is a feasible, radiation-free, reproducible imaging modality for the estimation of severity of AS in routine practice, knowing that CMRp tends to overestimate AVA and CMRhk to underestimate AVA compared with TTE.

Accelerated MRI for the assessment of cardiac function

Heart disease is a worldwide public health problem; assessment of cardiac function is an important part of the diagnosis and management of heart disease. MRI of the heart can provide clinically useful information on cardiac function, although it is still not routinely used in clinical practice, in part because of limited imaging speed. New accelerated methods for performing cardiovascular MRI (CMR) have the potential to provide both increased imaging speed and robustness to CMR, as well as access to increased functional information. In this review, we will briefly discuss the main methods currently employed to accelerate CMR methods, such as parallel imaging, k-t undersampling and compressed sensing, as well as new approaches that extend the idea of compressed sensing and exploit sparsity to provide richer information of potential use in clinical practice.

Quantification of left ventricular functional parameter values using 3D spiral bSSFP and through-time non-Cartesian GRAPPA

BACKGROUND

The standard clinical acquisition for left ventricular functional parameter analysis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) uses a multi-breathhold multi-slice segmented balanced SSFP sequence. Performing multiple long breathholds in quick succession for ventricular coverage in the short-axis orientation can lead to fatigue and is challenging in patients with severe cardiac or respiratory disorders. This study combines the encoding efficiency of a six-fold undersampled 3D stack of spirals balanced SSFP sequence with 3D through-time spiral GRAPPA parallel imaging reconstruction. This 3D spiral method requires only one breathhold to collect the dynamic data.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers were recruited for imaging at 3 T. The 3D spiral technique was compared against 2D imaging in terms of systolic left ventricular functional parameter values (Bland-Altman plots), total scan time (Welch's t-test) and qualitative image rating scores (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

RESULTS

Systolic left ventricular functional values were not significantly different (i.e. 3D-2D) between the methods. The 95% confidence interval for ejection fraction was -0.1 ± 1.6% (mean ± 1.96*SD). The total scan time for the 3D spiral technique was 48 s, which included one breathhold with an average duration of 14 s for the dynamic scan, plus 34 s to collect the calibration data under free-breathing conditions. The 2D method required an average of 5 min 40s for the same coverage of the left ventricle. The difference between 3D and 2D image rating scores was significantly different from zero (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.05); however, the scores were at least 3 (i.e. average) or higher for 3D spiral imaging.

CONCLUSION

The 3D through-time spiral GRAPPA method demonstrated equivalent systolic left ventricular functional parameter values, required significantly less total scan time and yielded acceptable image quality with respect to the 2D segmented multi-breathhold standard in this study. Moreover, the 3D spiral technique used just one breathhold for dynamic imaging, which is anticipated to reduce patient fatigue as part of the complete cardiac examination in future studies that include patients.

[Cardiac functional analysis with MRI]

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are among the leading causes of death worldwide. Even in the 21(st) century CVD will still be the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. Precise evaluation of cardiac function is therefore mandatory for therapy planning and monitoring. In this article the contribution of MRI-based analysis of cardiac function will be addressed. Nowadays cine-MRI is considered as the standard of reference (SOR) in cardiac functional analysis. ECG-triggered steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences are mainly used as they stand out due to short acquisition times and excellent contrast between the myocardium and the ventricular cavity. An indispensible requirement for cardiac functional analysis is an exact planning of the examination and based on that the coverage of the whole ventricle in short axial slices. By means of dedicated post-processing software, manual or semi-automatic segmentation of the endocardial and epicardial contours is necessary for functional analysis. In this way end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and the ejection fraction (EF) are defined and regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) can be detected.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 T: current state of the art

There are advantages to conducting cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies at a field strength of 3.0 Telsa, including the increase in bulk magnetization, the increase in frequency separation of off-resonance spins, and the increase in T1 of many tissues. However, there are significant challenges to routinely performing CMR at 3.0 T, including the reduction in main magnetic field homogeneity, the increase in RF power deposition, and the increase in susceptibility-based artifacts.In this review, we outline the underlying physical effects that occur when imaging at higher fields, examine the practical results these effects have on the CMR applications, and examine methods used to compensate for these effects. Specifically, we will review cine imaging, MR coronary angiography, myocardial perfusion imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and vascular wall imaging.