3D velocity quantification in the heart: improvements by 3D PC-SSFP

K-t PCA accelerated in-plane balanced steady-state free precession phase-contrast (PC-SSFP) for all-in-one diastolic function evaluation

PURPOSE

Diastolic function evaluation requires estimates of early and late diastolic mitral filling velocities (E and A) and of mitral annulus tissue velocity (e'). We aimed to develop an MRI method for simultaneous all-in-one diastolic function evaluation in a single scan by generating a 2D phase-contrast (PC) sequence with balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) contrast (PC-SSFP). E and A could then be measured with PC, and e' estimated by valve tracking on the magnitude images, using an established deep learning framework.

METHODS

Our PC-SSFP used in-plane flow-encoding, with zeroth and first moment nulling over each TR. For further acceleration, different k-t principal component analysis (PCA) methods were investigated with both retrospective and prospective undersampling. PC-SSFP was compared to separate balanced SSFP cine and PC-gradient echo acquisitions in phantoms and in 10 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

Phantom experiments showed that PC-SSFP measured accurate velocities compared to PC-gradient echo (r = 0.98 for a range of pixel-wise velocities -80 cm/s to 80 cm/s). In subjects, PC-SSFP generated high SNR and myocardium-blood contrast, and excellent agreement for E (limits of agreement [LOA] 0.8 ± 2.4 cm/s, r = 0.98), A (LOA 2.5 ± 4.1 cm/s, r = 0.97), and e' (LOA 0.3 ± 2.6 cm/s, r = 1.00), versus the standard methods. The best k-t PCA approach processed the complex difference data and substituted in raw k-space data. With prospective k-t PCA acceleration, higher frame rates were achieved (50 vs. 25 frames per second without k-t PCA), yielding a 13% higher e'.

CONCLUSION

The proposed PC-SSFP method achieved all-in-one diastolic function evaluation.

4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement

Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 - 3×3×3 mm(3), typical temporal resolution of 30-40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations.